resident-driven curriculum development and ultrasound curriculum needs assessment lynnea mills, md...

32
Resident-Driven Curriculum Development and Ultrasound Curriculum Needs Assessment Lynnea Mills, MD April 9, 2013

Upload: cedric-hensell

Post on 14-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Resident-Driven Curriculum Development

andUltrasound Curriculum Needs

Assessment

Lynnea Mills, MDApril 9, 2013

Overview, part I

• Review of literature on housestaff-led curricula• Novel approach to curriculum

development, designed to facilitate resident involvement

Overview, part II

• Description of our assessment of residents’ needs for future instruction on bedside ultrasound• Selected results from needs

assessment

Part I

Lit Review: Housestaff involvement in peer curricula

Residents teach faculty-

developed curricula

Peds residents teach mock code

sessions

EM senior residents teach interns bedside skills

IM residents teach med students on

wards

Sweeney A, et al. Senior pediatric residents as teachers for an innovative multidisciplinary mock code curriculum. J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Jun;3(2):188-95.

Boehm KM. Commentary on medical student education improvement using a resident-driven student rotation. South Med J. 2012 Feb;105(2):71.

Adler AC, Homayounrooz FF. Medical student education improvement using a resident-driven student rotation. South Med J. 2012 Feb;105(2):68-70.

Lit Review: Housestaff involvement in peer curricula

Residents design and teach

courses for peers

Psych residents teach a course on major depression

Psych residents teach a review course for ITE

Deligiannidis KM, et al. Psychiatry resident/fellow-initiated and -designed multi-modal psychopharmacology curriculum for major depression. Acad Psychiatry. 2012 Sep 1;36(5):414-8.

Vautrot VJ, Festin FE, Bauer MS. The feasibility and effectiveness of a pilot resident-organized and -led knowledge base review. Acad Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;34(4):258-62.

Lit Review: Housestaff involvement in peer curricula

Educators design programs to facilitate

residents’ involvement in curriculum development

Barriers to resident participation in curriculum development

• Lack of knowledge about curricular opportunities

• Inadequate understanding of the curriculum development process (lack of standardization of the process)

• Relative lack of good models in literature• Lack of mentors• Lack of time to commit to a long-term project

with inflexible scheduling

A common model for curriculum development

Proficiency

Lesson on skillset 4

Lesson on skillset 3

Lesson on skillset 2

Lesson on skillset 1

Curriculum Designer

An alternative model for curriculum development

Conceptual

Understanding

Curriculum Designer #1

An alternative model for curriculum development

Curriculum Designer #2

Curriculum Designer #3

Curriculum Designer #4

Curriculum Designer #5

Conceptual

Understanding

Curriculum Designer #1

An alternative model for curriculum development

Curriculum Designer #2

Curriculum Designer #3

Curriculum Designer #4

Curriculum Designer #5

Conceptual

Understanding

Our model

Individual or group identifies multi-faceted curriculum need

Develops infrastructure and sustainable layout

Writes a large bank of research questions

Our model, cont’d

Future educators choose sub-topics and develop discrete courses using existing structure

Use existing question bank to study course efficacy

Conclusions

• There’s little documented resident involvement in curriculum development, and no documented planning to engage residents in curriculum development.

• Our approach of standardizing and “modularizing” a curriculum development process may serve as a model for facilitating resident participation in curriculum development by eliminating several barriers to involvement.

Part II

Needs assessment

Internet survey sent spring 2012 to all new matches and current residents (R1-R4)

34-37 forced-choice questions + free text

• 55 new match respondents (85%)• 81 current resident respondents (~60%)

• Perceived importance of ultrasound• Confidence/experience with ultrasound for basic IM

procedures• Areas of desired instruction

Not all residents know how to use ultrasound for required procedures

CVC Arterial line Paracentesis Thoracentesis0

20

40

60

80

100New Matches

Residents

Perc

enta

ge o

f res

pond

ents

who

“kn

ow”

how

to u

se u

ltras

ound

for p

roce

dure

Many respondents “would like more training” on ultrasound use for procedures

CVC Arterial line Paracentesis Thoracentesis0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

New MatchesResidents

Some residents are uncomfortable supervising interns who are not trained on US

Comfortable82%

Not com-fort-able18%

Nearly all residents prefer interns receive more training on US

Agree93%

Disagree7%

Respondents willing to spend own time on further US training

New matches Residents0

20

40

60

80

100

Pe

rcen

t of r

espo

nden

ts

will

ing

to c

omm

it ow

n tim

e

Respondents willing to spend own time on further US training

New matches Residents0

20

40

60

80

100

Pe

rcen

t of r

espo

nden

ts

will

ing

to c

omm

it ow

n tim

e

Conclusions

• New matches are less comfortable and skilled with ultrasound, but even current residents still feel inadequately trained in multiple areas of bedside ultrasound use.

• All participants are interested in obtaining further formal training.

Many thanks to…

Tom DeCato, MD

Sirisha Narayana, MD

Nina Saxena, MD

Amy Morris, MD

Jennifer Best, MD

Ken Steinberg, MD

Renata Thronson, MD

Curriculum Designer #1

An alternate model for curriculum development

Curriculum Designer #2

Curriculum Designer #3

Curriculum Designer #4

Curriculum Designer #5

Conceptual

Understanding

BibliographyAdler AC, Homayounrooz FF. Medical student education improvement using a resident-driven student rotation. South Med J. 2012 Feb;105(2):68-70.

Backes CH, et al. Fellows as teachers: a model to enhance pediatric resident education. Med Educ Online. 2011;16.

Boehm KM. Commentary on medical student education improvement using a resident-driven student rotation. South Med J. 2012 Feb;105(2):71.

Deligiannidis KM, et al. Psychiatry resident/fellow-initiated and -designed multi-modal psychopharmacology curriculum for major depression. Acad Psychiatry. 2012 Sep 1;36(5):414-8.

Keating EM, O'donnell EP, Starr SR. How we created a peer-designed specialty-specific selective for medical student career exploration. Med Teach. 2013;35(2):91-4.

Laiteerapong N, et al. A resident-led quality improvement initiative to improve obesity screening. Am J Med Qual. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):315-22.

Sweeney A, et al. Senior pediatric residents as teachers for an innovative multidisciplinary mock code curriculum. J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Jun;3(2):188-95.

Vautrot VJ, Festin FE, Bauer MS. The feasibility and effectiveness of a pilot resident-organized and -led knowledge base review. Acad Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;34(4):258-62.