resisting the “war on obesity” technologies of the gendered body (week 8)
TRANSCRIPT
OutlineWhat is the “war on obesity”?Resisting the “war on obesity”:
AdvertisingFeminismCritical obesity studiesFat activism
FeminismThe body as a site of patriarchal oppressionCompulsory heterosexualityThe evaluation of women by appearanceDieting as a form of physical and emotional
harmDieting as a time-consuming distractionDieting as a form of control
Critical obesity studiesGard and Wright 2005: 136“…when the prevailing conditions are
described as an “epidemic”, hyperbole no longer looks like hyperbole, ideology can look like common sense and moralising can even look like science”.
Critical obesity studiesQuestioning weight gain stats (Campos et
al, 2006: 55)“…what we have seen in the US in a relatively
modest rightward skewing of average weight on the distribution curve, with people of lower weights gaining little or no weight, and the majority of people weighing 3-5kg more than they did a generation ago. The average American’s weight gain can be explained by 10 extra calories a day, or the equivalent of a Big Mac once every 2 months. […] This is hardly the orgy of fast food binging and inactivity widely thought to be to blame for the supposed fat explosion.”
Critical obesity studiesQuestioning the health crisis:
BMI is very weak predictor of mortality (especially in “overweight” category (BMI 25-29.9); closer correlation in high 30’s)
Extremes of thinness are overlookedLittle account taken of confounding factors –
fitness / exercise / weight cycling / economic status etc
Being overweight can have a protective effect
Critical obesity studiesQuestioning the practicality / ethics of
advocating weight loss:Most diets end in regain (plus more) (see Mann
et al)Weight cycling is very unhealthyMany weight loss interventions have serious
side-effects and complicationsMany health problems (e.g. heart disease /
diabetes) can be treated successfully without weight loss
Critical obesity studies“Obesity epidemic” as a moral panic:
“Gluttony or sloth” (House of Commons Health Select Committee, 2004)
Obesity as a “moral” failure to care for the selfAlarmist language (time bombs)
Critical obesity studies“Obesity epidemic” as a moral panic:
“Gluttony or sloth” (House of Commons Health Select Committee, 2004)
Obesity as a “moral” failure to care for the selfAlarmist language (time bombs)Intense media coverageUnderlying rhetoric around gender / race /
class (see Herndon 2005)
Fat ActivismRe-claiming the fat body; “Flabulous”
(Marilyn Wann)Resisting dieting as harmfulResisting anti-fat discriminationCampaigning for better health careGender – encouraging women to take up
spaceNational Association to Advance Fat
Acceptance; International Size Acceptance Association
BBW events; see also, Monaghan (Big Handsome Men, Bears…)