respanal.doc

7/26/2019 respanal.doc

1/28

S.NO Statements Fully

(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

1 Performance Appraisalprovides anopportunity for each

employees to have

understanding of his

reporting officersexpectation from him.

26

17.33 %

92

61.33 %

2

16 %

7

.67 %

1

!.67 %

ASSESSMEN OF !E"FO"MANCE A!!"A#SAL S$SEM #N

#N%#AN A#"L#NES

A&LE '.

12


2/28

CHART 4.1

Performance Appraisal provides an

opportunity for each employees to have

understanding of his reporting officers

expectation from him.

26

92

247 1

Fully

Considerable

Extent

Some Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

A majority of the respondents (61%) responded that present Performance

Appraisal ystem provided an opportunity for each employees to have

understanding of his reporting officers expectation from him to a considera!le

extent .

A&LE '.2


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

2 Performance Appraisal

helps the employees toidentify their strength

and "ea#ness.

21

1%

9'

62.67%

27

1$%

2.67

2.67

13


3/28

CHART 4.2

Performance Appraisal helps the

employees to identify their strength

and "ea#ness.

21

94

27

4 4 Fully

Considerable

Extent

Some Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

A majority of the respondents (6$%) responded that the Performance Appraisal

helps the employees to identify their strengths and "ea#nesses to a

considera!le extent.

1


4/28

A&LE '.


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)


helps provides anopportunity for self

revie"&assessment

1'

1! %

9*

*' +

2$

1$.67 %

(

6 %

2

1.33 %

CHART 4.3

Performance Appraisal helps

provides an opportunity for self%

revie"&assessment

15

96

289

20

20

40

60

80100

120

A majority of the respondents (6'%) responded that the Performance Appraisal

helps provides an opportunity for self&revie" and assessment to a

considera!le extent.

1'


5/28

A&LE '.'

S.NO Statements Fully(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent(No.emp)

Some

Extent(No.emp)

Little

Extent(No.emp)

Not at all(No.emp)

Performance Appraisal

assessment of each

employee focuses onthe personality factors

and attri)utes re*uired

for current +o).

$

'.33 %

9,

*-. +

31

2!.67 %

(

6 %

2.67 %

CHART 4.4

Performance Appraisal assessment

of each employee focuses on the

personality factors and attri!utes

re(uired for current jo!.

898

1

9

4

Fully

Considerable

Extent

Some Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

A majority of the respondents (6%) responded that Performance Appraisal

assessment of each employee focuses on the personality factors and attri!utes

reuired for current jo!.

16


6/28

A&LE '.-

S.NO Statements

Fully

(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent(No.emp)

Some

Extent(No.emp)

Little

Extent(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

' Performance Appraisalensures feed)ac# to the

employees

1$

12 %

2'

16.67 %

9

* +

1

(.33 %

3

2 %

18 25

90

14

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

CHART 4.5

PA *+,-*

**/0A2

34 35*

*6P748**

A majority of the respondents (69%) feel that Performance Appraisal ensuresfeed!ac# to the employees to some extent!

17


7/28

A&LE '.*


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

6 Appraisal system

provides anopportunity for a

discussion )et"een the

appraiser and appraiseon the expectations

achievement, failure,

constraint andimprovements

re*uired.

1

(.33 %

9'

*2.*/ +

23

1'.33 %

13

$.67 %

6

%

CHART 4.6

Appraisal system provides an opportunity

for a discussion !et"een the appraiser and

appraise on the expectations

achievem ent: failure: constraint and

improvements re(uired.

14

94

2

1 6

Fully

Considerable

Extent

Some Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

ost of the respondents (6$%) responded that to a considera!le extent they are

in favour to the a!ove hypothesis!

1$


8/28

A&LE './


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)


system encouragesopen communication

)et"een each

appraiserappraise pairthrough performance

revie" discussion.

$

'.33 %

9

* +

2'

16.67 %

1(

12.67 %

$

'.33 %

hart '.;

Performance Appraisal system encourages open

communication !et"een each appraiser%appraise pair

through performance revie" discussion.

8

90

25

198

1

2

4

5

(69%) respondents responded that Performance appraisal system encourages

open communication !et"een appraiser&appraise through performance revie"

discussion to a considera!le extent "hich exhi!its a good picture a!out


9/28

A&LE '.,


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

$ -he appraisal system

has scope for correcting the )iases of

reporting officer

thorough revie"process.

1'

1! %

21

1 %

,,

-,.*/ +

17

11.33 %

(

6 %

CHART 4.8

3he appraisal system has scope for

correcting the !iases of reporting

officer thorough revie" process.

15 21

88

17 90

20

40

6080

100

Fully

Considerable

Extent

SomeExtent

LittleExtent

Notatall

A majority of the respondents (=%) responded that the appraisal system has

scope for correcting the !iases of reporting officer through revie" process to

some extent only .

2!


10/28

A&LE '.9


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

( Periodic orientation

programmes areconducted to explain

the details of the

appraisal system.

11

7.33 %

1

(.33 %

13

$.67 %

,/

-, +

2'

16.67 %

hart '.>

Periodic orientation programme s are conducted to

explain the details of the appraisal system.

1114

1

87

251

2

4

5

(=%) no of respondents responded that only to little extent periodic orientation

programmes are conducted to explain the details of the appraisal system.

21


11/28

A&LE '.


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

1! Performance revie"

discussion areconducted in a

satisfactory manner.

$

'.33 %

21

1 %

9*

*' +

2!

13.33 %

'

3.33 %

S1

821

96

205

0

20

40

60

80

100

5A-3 '.19

Performance revie" discussion are

conducted in a satisfactory manner.

ajority of the respondents (6'%)responded that only to some extent

performance revie" discussions are conducted in a satisfactory manner.

22


12/28

A&LE '.


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)11 /0 0epartment

follo"s up seriously

the training needs

identified during theappraisal process.

(

6 %

11

7.33 %

9'

*2.*/ +

12

$ %

2

16 %

CHART 4.11

5-/ /epartment follo"s up seriously

the training needs identified during

the appraisal process.9

11

94

12

24 Fully

Considerable

Extent

Some Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

ajority of the respondents(6$%) responded that 5-/ /epartment follo"s up

seriously the training needs identified during the appraisal process to some

extent.

23


13/28

A&LE '.2


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)12 fforts are made )y

appraiser to )e

o)+ective in the

appraisal.

3

2 %

2$

1$.67 %

92

*. +

23

1',33 %

2.67 %

CHART 4.12

*fforts are made !y appraiser to !e

o!jective in the appraisal.

28

92

2 4

Fully

Considerable

Extent

Some Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

ajority of the respondents(61%) responded that only to some extent efforts

are made !y appraiser to !e o!jective in the appraisal. 3hey feel that the

present PA "as ?(a)


14/28

A&LE '.


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

13a Appraisal data is used )y

/0 0epartment forother

+udgmental&developmental

decision li#e!ay

'

3.33 %

1$

12 %

*9

'* +

13

$.67 %

'

3! %

CHART 4.13

Pay

5

18

69

1

45

010

20040

5060

7080

Fully

Considerable

Extent

SomeEx

tent

Littl

eEx

tent

Nota

tall

PA8? ajority of the respondents('6%) feel that appraisal data is used !y 5-/

department for @udgmental&developmental decisions li#e pay only to some

extent.

2'


15/28

A&LE '.'


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)13) Appraisal data is used )y

/0 0epartment for

other

+udgmental&developmentaldecision li#e!romotion

1'

1! %

17

11.33 %

,*

-/. +

1(

12.67 %

13

$.67 %

CHART 4.14

Promotion

15 17

86

19 1010

200405060708090

100

ajority of the respondents(;%) feel that appraisal data is used !y 5-/

department for @udgmental&developmental decisions li#e promotion only to

some extent.

26


16/28

A&LE '.-


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

13c Appraisal data is used )y



decisionli#eermination

(

6 %

11

7.33 %

/*

-.*/ +

27

1$ %

27

1$ %

911

76

27 27

0102004050607080

CHART 4.15

3ermination

ajority of the respondents (9%) feel that appraisal data is used !y 5-/

department for @udgmental&developmental decisions li#e termination only to

some extent.

27


17/28

A&LE '.*


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

13d Appraisal data is used )y



decision li#e0uman

"esour1e !lannin

3

2 %

/-

- +

23

1'.33 %

27

1$ %

22

1.67 %

CHART 4.16

5uman -esource Planning

75

2

27

22Fully

Considerable

ExtentSome Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

ajority of the respondents (9%) feel that appraisal data is used !y 5-/

department for @udgmental&developmental decisions li#e 5uman -esource

Planning to a considera!le extent.

2$


18/28

A&LE './


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)13e Appraisal data is used )y

/0 0epartment for

other

+udgmental&developmentaldecision li#eCareer

!lannin

7

.67

12

$ %

,*

-/. +

21

1 %

2

16 %

hart '.1;

areer planning

712

86

21

24

1

2

4

5

ajority of the respondents(;.%) feel that appraisal data is used !y 5-/

department for @udgmental&developmental decisions li#e areer Planning only

to some extent .

2(


19/28

A&LE '.,


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

13f Appraisal data is used )y



decisionli#e!er3orman1e

#mpro4ement

(

6 %

27

1$ %

,

-' +

1'

1! %

1$

12 %

9

27

81

15 18

0

20

40

60

80

100

CHART 4.18

Performance


20/28

A&LE '.9


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

1 -he appraisal data is used

as inputs for recognitionand encouragement of

high performers and

desira)le )ehaviour.

(

6 %

1(

12.67 %

9-

*. +

17

11.33 %

1!

6.67 %

CHART 4.19

3he appraisal data is used as inputs for

recognition and encouragement of high

performers and desira!le !ehaviour.

9 19

95

17 10

Fully

Considerable

Extent

Some Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

3he majority of the respondents(6%) responded that the appraisal data is used

as inputs for recognition and encouragement of high performers and desira!le

!ehaviour only to some extent.

31


21/28

A&LE '.2


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

1' -he performance

revie" committee do athorough +o) of

revie"ing and using

the appraisal data.

2.67 %

2

16 %

9

* +

23

1'.33 %

(

6 %

hart '.$9

3he performance revie" committee do thorough jo!

of revie"ing and using the appraisal data.

424

90

29

1

2

4

5

3he findings say that the performance revie" committee do thorough jo! of

revie"ing and using the appraisal data only to some extent.

32


22/28

A&LE '.2


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)16 Appraisal facilitates

gro"th and learning in

this organiation.

$

'.33 %

21

1 %

,9

-9. +

22

1.67 %

1!

6.67 %

hart '.$1

Appraisal facilitates gro"th and learning in the

organiBation.

821

89

2210

1

2

4

5

3he majority of the respondents(>%)responded that appraisal facilitates

gro"th and learning in this organiBation to some extent only.

33


23/28

A&LE '.22


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)17 4ncreasing the

fre*uency of

appraising your

performance "ill helpin ma#ing the overall

appraisal exercise

more

o)+ective&accurate.

(

6 %

33

22 %

,'

'6 %

1'

1! %

(

6 %

CHART 4.22


24/28

A&LE '.2


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

1$ Performance appraisal

record is made #no"nto the employees.

9

* +

26

17.33 %

1(

12.67 %

1!

6.67 %

'

3.33 %

Performance appraisal record is made

#no"n to the employees.

9026

19

105

1

2

4

5

A!out (69%) respondents responded that the performance appraisal record is

made #no"n to the employees.

3'


25/28

A&LE '.2'


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)1( -he performance is

assessed on the )asis

of #ey performance

area.

16

1!.67 %

21

1 %

,9

-9. +

1

(.33 %

1!

6.67 %

3he performance is assessed on the !asis

of #ey performance area.

16

21

89

1410

1

2

4

5

3he majority of the respondents (=>%) responded that the performance is

assessed on the !asis of #ey performance area only to some extent.

36


26/28

A&LE '.2-


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

2!a -o "hat extent the

interaction of performance appraisal

exist "ith the

follo"ing humanresource development

process /ole analysis

6

%

12

$ %

9/

*'.*/ +

2

16 %

11

7.33 %

CHART 4.25

-ole analysis

6 12

97

24

11

Fully

Considerable

Extent

Some Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

3he majority of the respondents (6'%) expressed that only to some extent the

performance appraisal process interacts "ith the human resource development

process? -ole Analysis.

37


27/28

A&LE '.2*


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

2!) -o "hat extent the


exist "ith the


process Performance

Planning

2

1.33 %

1'

1! %

,9

-9. +

3'

23.33 %

(

6 %

CHART 4.26

Performance Planning

2 15

89

5

9

Fully

Considerable

Extent

Some Extent

Little Extent

Not at all

A!out (>%) of employees responded that only to some extent the performance

appraisal process interacts "ith the human resource development process?

Performance Planning.

3$


28/28

A&LE '.2/


(No.emp)

Considerable

Extent

(No.emp)

Some

Extent

(No.emp)

Little

Extent

(No.emp)

Not at all

(No.emp)

2!c -o "hat extent the


exist "ith the


process Performance

Analysis and /evie"

7

.67 %

13

$.67 %

9

*.*/ +

3!

2! %

(

6 %

Fully

ConsiderableExtent

SomeExtent

LittleExtent

Notatall

71

91

0

9

0

10

20

0

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

CHART 4.27

Performance Analysis and -evie"

3he majority of the respondents (69%) responded that only to some extent the

performance appraisal process interacts the 5-/ process? Performance

Analysis And -evie".

3(

respanal.doc

Documents