respiratory support and respiratory outcome in preterm infants pd dr. med. ulrich thome division of...
TRANSCRIPT
Respiratory support and respiratory outcome
in preterm infants
PD Dr. med. Ulrich Thome
Division of Neonatolgy and Pediatric Critical Care
University Children’s Hospital
Ulm, Germany
Topics
• Sequelae of lung injury
• Conventional ventilation strategies
• Synchronized ventilation
• Volume-controlled ventilation
• High frequency ventilation
• Permissive hypercapnia
• Non-invasive ventilation
• Sequelae of lung injury– Acute lung injury (air leaks)– Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
• Conventional ventilation strategies
• Synchronized ventilation
• Volume-controlled ventilation
• High frequency ventilation
• Permissive hypercapnia
• Non-invasive ventilation
Topics
• Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (Northway 1967)– Epithelial metaplasia– Fibrosis– Smooth muscle hypertrophy– Heterogenous inflation
• “New BPD“ (Jobe 1999)– Extremely immature preterm infants, surfactant-treated– Arrested lung development
• Reduced alveolar formation • Reduced gas exchange area• Reduced microvascular development
• Definition: Oxygen or ventilator support needed at 36 weeks PMA
BPD
• Sequelae of lung injury
• Conventional ventilation strategies– Avoiding volutrauma– Avoiding atelectotrauma
• Synchronised ventilation
• Volume controlled ventilation
• High frequency ventilation
• Permissive hypercapnia
• Non-invasive ventilation
Topics
• ventilator-induced lung injury• Volutrauma rather than barotrauma
(Dreyfuss D et al. AJRCCM 1998)
• Multicenter trial in adults: Lower VT reduced mortality, lung injury and multi-organ failure (N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1301-8)
=>↓ Tidal volume:• Decreases lung injury• May result in “permissive hypercapnia”
Operator
Mechanical ventilation is harmful!
B Normal VT, high PEEP
A High VT
low PEEPD Optimal
A BTime →
Volutrauma Zone
C
Volutrauma Zone atelectasis
overdistention
D
C Normal VT
low PEEPW. A. Carlo
Which volumes cause lung injury?
Effect of 6 inadequately large breaths
MV = VT * f
Reduced tidal volume can be compensated by increase of rate
Respiratory minute ventilation
NNT Pneu: 11 NNT PIE: 5Trend towards reduced mortalityHowever: no reduction in BPD
B Normal VT, high PEEP
A High VT
low PEEPD Optimal
A BTime →
Volutrauma Zone
C
Volutrauma Zone atelectasis
overdistention
D
C Normal VT
low PEEPW. A. Carlo
Which volumes cause lung injury?
• Animal studies indicate increased lung injury at too low or too high PEEP levels
• Multicenter trial of two PEEP levels in adults with ARDS: no difference
(N Engl J Med 2004; 351:327-336)
• No randomized studies on preterm infants available
Optimal PEEP level
• Sequelae of lung injury
• Conventional ventilation strategies
• Synchronised ventilation
• Volume controlled ventilation
• High frequency ventilation
• Permissive hypercapnia
• Non-invasive ventilation
Topics
Possible advantages:
• higher patient comfort
• more stable gas exchange because of the patients’ own regulatory mechanisms
Possible disadvantage: increased volutrauma
• Flow sensors used for triggering: – 1 ml of dead space = 33% of VT in 500g infant
• More frequent occurrence of Head’s reflex Pediatr Pulmonol. 1997, 24:195-203
Why synchronize?
BPD at 28 days postnatal age
BPD at 36 weeks postmenstrual age
Synchronized Ventilation
Air leaks
Death
• Sequelae of lung injury
• Conventional ventilation strategies
• Synchronized ventilation
• Volume controlled ventilation
• High frequency ventilation
• Permissive hypercapnia
• Non-invasive ventilation
Topics
• Two forms– Volume controlled– Volume guarantee
• Automatically adjusts peak pressure to ensure correct tidal volume– Immediately responds to inadvertent changes in
lung mechanics
• Requires a flow sensor– Increased deadspace may lead to increased
volutrauma in extremely small infants (< 1000g)
Volume controlled ventilation
0.1 1 10
Volume controlled
Mortality
Pneumothorax
BPD 28d
BPD 36w
Volume guarantee
Mortality
Pneumothorax
BPD 28d
BPD 36w
volume ctrl better | conventional better
Volume controlled ventilation
• Sequelae of lung injury
• Conventional ventilation strategies
• Synchronized ventilation
• Volume controlled ventilation
• High frequency ventilation
• Permissive hypercapnia
• Non-invasive ventilation
Topics
• High frequency (300-1200/min = 5-20 Hz)
• Very small tidal volumes
• Incomplete inspiration and expiration
• Dampening of oscillations in the airways
=> Very small intra-alveolar pressure amplitude
Features of HFV
0,5 1 1,5
#Stud.| #Pts
Mortality 17 3776
BPD28 12 2104
BPD28/D 12 2305
BPD36 14 2869
BPD36/D 14 2969
Air leaks 16 3721
IVH°3-4 17 3733
PVL 14 3570
HFV better | conventional better
NNH = 28
Thome U et al.: ADC F&N ed., in press
0.5 1 1.5
BPD36/D
all 14 2969
HFV / HLVS 12 2771
SM3100 7 1270
CMV / LPVS 7 2232
HFPPV 3 1381
IVH°3-4
all 17 3733
HFV / HLVS 13 2822
SM3100 7 1252
CMV / LPVS 7 2217
HFPPV 3 1366
#Stud.| #Pts
HFV better | conventional better
NNT = 16
NNT = 26
Thome U et al.: ADC F&N ed., in press
• Sequelae of lung injury
• Conventional ventilation strategies
• Synchronised ventilation
• Volume controlled ventilation
• High frequency ventilation
• Permissive hypercapnia
• Non-invasive ventilation
Topics
• Less than normal PaCO2 requires higher work of breathing.
• Higher than normal PaCO2 impairs oxygenation
Mechanical ventilation - normal PaCO2 not needed:
• Impaired oxygenation can be easily compensated by ↑FiO2
• Increased PACO2 improves CO2 removal
• Higher PaCO2 goal provides a greater margin of safety against hypocapnia
Why maintain a PaCO2 of 40 mmHg?
0.1 1 10
BPD36w/death
Mariani 1999
Carlo 2002
Thome 2005
Total
IVH °3-4
Mariani 1999
Carlo 2002
Thome 2005
Total
hypercapnia better | normocapnia better
Randomised trials
• Sequelae of lung injury
• Conventional ventilation strategies
• Synchronised ventilation
• Volume controlled ventilation
• High frequency ventilation
• Permissive hypercapnia
• Non-invasive ventilation– Nasal CPAP– Nasal IMV
Topics
NNT Failure: 4.0; NNT Mortality: 4.5; NNH Pneumotx. : 8
CDP n=71, standard care n=74
nCPAP or CNP for RDS
NNT Failure: 6 nCPAP n=239, headbox n=240
nCPAP after Extubation
0.1 1 10
Post extubation failure
short prongs
Barrington 2001
Khalaf 2000
long prongs
Friedlich 1999
Total
BPD at 36 weeks PMA
Barrington 2001
Khalaf 2000
Total
nIPPV better | nCPAP better
nIPPV vs nCPAP after Extubation
• High rate (60/min) low tidal volume ventilation: – better short-term results than low rate ventilation
• Synchronized and volume controlled ventilation: – not shown to improve long-term outcome– need dead space increasing flow sensors– may be associated with increased VT
• High frequency ventilation:– no better outcome than high rate low tidal volume ventilation
• Permissive hypercapnia:– not shown to improve long-term outcome – moderately high PaCO2 goals safe
• Non-invasive ventilation:– reduces the need for intubation and invasive ventilation– increases success rate after extubation: nIMV > nCPAP– increased incidence of air leaks compared to no ventilation
Summary
• Use only when absolutely necessary• Machine: any• Rate: high (>60/min)• PEEP: sufficient (3-6 mbar)• Tidal volume: as small as possible (don’t measure)• Synchronization, volume-controlled, volume-
guarantee: use under special circumstances, flow sensor contraindicated <1000g
• HFOV: not necessary for usual infants• Permissive hypercapnia: moderately high PaCO2 g • Non-invasive ventilation: use instead of invasive vent.
whenever possible, don’t use in too healthy pts
Recommendation for ventilation