respiratory viruses in pediatric age
DESCRIPTION
Slide Set by Professor Susanna Esposito, president WAidid, and specialist pediatrician and infectivologistTRANSCRIPT
RESPIRATORY VIRUSES IN PEDIATRIC AGE
Susanna EspositoPediatric Highly Intensive Care Unit
Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano
Milan, Italy
AGENDA
• Morbillo
• Influenza
• Other emerging viruses
• Genetics and viral infections
• New vaccines
Measles Case Distribution by Month and WHO Regions, 2008-2014
This is surveillance data, hence for the last month, the data may be incomplete. SEAR India is not included in this graph.As of 27 May 2013, South Sudan has reassigned to the Africa region (AFR) from the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR).Data source: surveillance DEF file
Data in HQ as of 4 August 2014
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
gen2008
Apr Jul Oct gen2009
Apr Jul Oct gen2010
Apr Jul Oct gen2011
Apr Jul Oct gen2012
Apr Jul Oct gen2013
Apr Jul Oct gen2014
Apr
AFR SEAR AMR EMR EUR WPR
Number of Reported Measles Cases with onset date from Jan 2014 to Jun 2014 (6M period)
Data source: surveillance DEF fileData in HQ as of 4 August 2014
The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. ©WHO 2014. All rights reserved.
0 (64 countries or 33%)1 - 9 (24 countries or 12%)
10 - 99 (32 countries or 16%)
100 - 999 (40 countries or 21%)
≥1000 (15 countries or 8%)No data reported to WHO HQ
(19 countries or 10%)
Not applicable
! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !
! !! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !! !
! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !! ! ! !
! !! !! !! !! !
! ! !! ! ! !
! ! ! !! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
!! !
!! !! !! !! !! !
! ! !! ! !! ! !! !
! !! !
!!
! !! ! !
! ! ! !! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !! ! !
! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! ! !
! ! !! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! !
! !! ! !
! !! !
!! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!
!! ! ! !! ! !! !
!
! !! !
! ! ! !! ! ! !! ! !! ! !
!
! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !! ! !! ! !
ECDC measles monitoring 2013
ECDC measles monitoring 2013
Population immunity
Epidemiology and genotype data
Surveillance performance
Sustainability of immunization programme
Supplementary evidence
WHO requests - Status by country…
8
Status of measles and rubella elimination
39established National Verification Committee 14 pending
35 Annual Status Reports (2010-2012)
MEASLES 16 interrupted transmission RUBELLA 19 interrupted transmission
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Israel, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Israel, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Republic of Moldova, Portugal, Slovakia
10
Data challenges
quality
completenessconsistency
Completeness of reports
Component (%)NVC statement 33 (100%)Immunization coverage (2010-12 + historic) 25 (76%)*Measles incidence 33 (100%)Rubella incidence 32 (97%)Lab performance 33 (100%)Genotype information 22 (67%)Sustainability of NIP 33 (100%)Public acceptance 24 (73%)
* Various methods
Available at: http://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/Influenza_Summary_IRA_HA_interface_03July13.pdf
H7N9 infections in people and poultry in China in April-MaySporadic infections in humans; many with poultry exposureNo sustained or community transmission
H7N9 OUTBREAK CHARACTERIZATION
Distribution of Respiratory Viruses during the Winter Season 2003–2004
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Influenza RSV hMPV Coronaviruses Rhinovirus Adenovirus
Weeks2003 2004
N=2060 children aged under 15 years
Esposito S, et al. J Med Virol 2006;78:1609–15 and author’s own data.
Perc
enta
ge o
f cas
es
Effect of Age on Healthcare Burden
<6 months 6–12 months 1–<3 years 3 –<5 years 5 –<15 years
Exce
ss e
vent
s pe
r 100
chi
ldre
nOutpatient visits16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Courses of antibiotics
Excess treatment events in otherwise healthy children under 15 years of age; data over 19 consecutive seasons (US)
Neuzil KM, et al. N Engl J Med 2000;342:225–31. Age
Hospitalisation during Influenza Season according to Age and Presence of Underlying Chronic Disease
YEARS AGEHOSPIT./
100,000 HR SUBJECTS
HOSPIT./100,000 HEALTHY
SUBJECTS
1973 − 19930 − 11 mos
12 − 24 mos3 – 4 yrs
5 – 14 yrs
190080032092
496 – 10381868641
1992 – 19970 − 23 mos
2 – 4 yrs5 – 17 yrs
−−−
144 – 1870 – 258 – 12
1968 − 197315 – 44 yrs45 – 64 yrs≥65 yrs
56 – 110392 – 635399 – 518
23 – 2513 – 23
−1969 – 1995 < 65 yrs
≥65 yrs−−
20 – 42 (*)125 − 228 (*)
(*) without a separation between high-risk (HR) and healthy subjects.Izurieta HS, et al. N Engl J Med 2000;342:232–9.
0
5
10
15
20
25
<6 months
6–11months
1 year
2 years
3 years
4 years
5–10 years
11–17years
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0
Influenza-Associated Deaths among Children in the United States 2003–2004
Distribution of cases and mortality rates by age group among 153 children with fatal influenza, USA, 2003–2004 season.
Age group
Chi
ldre
n w
ith fa
tal i
nflu
enza
(%)
Deaths per 100,000 children
Fatal influenza cases Mortality rate
Bhat N, et al. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2559–67.
Role of Children in the Transmission of Influenza inHouseholds and Schools
Children are the major pathway of
influenza transmission within communities and
households2
SchoolHousehold &
family members
Influenza attack rates are highest in children, average rate 20.3% (7.5–25.8%)1
Influenza virustransmission
1. Molinari NAM, et al. Vaccine 2007; 25:5086–96.2. Weycker D, et al. Vaccine 2005;23:1284–93.
Influenza B Virus Circulation from 2001 to 2011 Influenza Seasons in the USA and Europe
USA Europe
Ambrose CS, et al. Human Vaccin Immunother 2012;8:81−8.
Influenza B Circulation by Lineages in the USA and Europe between 2001 and 2011
USA
23
100
7
74
19
77
217
8494
7793
2,8
81
23
9883
166
0102030405060708090
100
% In
fluen
za B
str
ains
by
linea
ge
Influenza season and vaccine lineage
EuropeRecommended-Lineage Influenza B Opposite-Lineage Influenza B
Data notavailable
Ambrose CS, et al. Human Vaccin Immunother 2012;8:81−8.
Evolution of Two Antigenically Distinct Lineages of Influenza B (1970-2006)
The pattern of varying dominance of the two influenza B lineages is likely driven by lineage-specific immunity in the population
One lineage predominates until accumulated immunity to that lineage results in increased relative susceptibility to and spread of the other lineage
Chen R, et al. J Mol Evol 2008;66:655−63.
Influenza B Strains: is there a Need of a Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine?
In 5/10 influenza seasons between 2001–2002 and 2010–2011, the predominant circulating influenza B lineage was different from that chosen for the vaccine
Influenza vaccination campaigns have had limited effectiveness against influenza B epidemics during seasons in which a significant proportion of the disease was caused by opposite-lineage influenza B strains
This reduced effectiveness in such seasons could be avoided if seasonal influenza vaccines included four strains, one strain from each B lineage in addition to A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains
It is recommended that vaccines for use in the 2013-2014 influenza season (northern hemisphere winter) contain the following: – an A/California/7/2009 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus – an A(H3N2) virus antigenically like the cell-propagated prototype virus A/Victoria/361/2011 – a B/Massachusetts/2/2012-like virus
It is recommended that quadrivalent vaccines containing two influenza B viruses contain the above three viruses and - a B/Brisbane/60/2008-like virus
2013-2014 WHO RECOMMENDATION FOR INFLUENZA VACCINE COMPOSITION
IMMUNE RESPONSE OF CHILDREN >3 YEARSTO QUADRIVALENT INFLUENZA VACCINE
(From Domachowske JB et al., J Infect Dis 2013)
Jain et al., N Engl J Med 2013
UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINATION STRATEGIES
M2e-based vaccines
Hemagglutinin-based vaccines
Neuraminidase-based vaccines
T Cell-based vaccines
Ebola Outbreaks
1976- First Major Outbreak (ZEBOV)
1976- Sudan (SEBOV)
Occur Sporadically www.cdc.gov for more
information
Diagnosis of Ebola
Timeline of Infection Diagnostic tests available
Within a few days after symptoms begin
•Antigen‐capture enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) testing•IgM ELISA•Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)•Virus isolation
Later in disease course or after recovery •IgM and IgG antibodies
Retrospectively in deceased patients•Immunohistochemistry testing•PCR•Virus isolation
• Diagnosing Ebola can be difficult at first since early symptoms, such as fever, are nonspecific to Ebola infection.
• However, if a person has the early symptoms and has had contact with Ebola they should be isolated and public health professionals notified.
• Samples from the patient can then be collected and tested to confirm infection.
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/diagnosis/index.html Accessed Oct. 14, 2014
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/pdf/checklist‐patients‐evaluated‐us‐evd.pdf Accessed Oct. 14, 2014
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/pdf/ppe‐poster.pdf Accessed Oct. 14, 2014
For more detail on PPE for Health Care Workers, please visit: http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/hcp/infection‐prevention‐and‐control‐recommendations.html
Hospital Preparedness Checklist
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;. Accessed October 15, 2014http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/pdf/hospital‐checklist‐ebola‐preparedness.pdf
• Every hospital should ensure that it can detect a patient with Ebola, protect health care workers, and respond in a coordinated fashion.
• Many signs and symptoms of Ebola are non‐specific and similar to common diseases.
• Transmission can be prevented with appropriate infection control measures.
• Checklist highlights key areas for hospital emergency management officers, infection control practitioners, and clinicians to detect possible Ebola cases, protect employees, and respond appropriately.
• Hospitals should review infection control procedures and incorporate plans for administrative, environmental, and communication measures, as well as personal protective equipment (PPE) training and education.
• Hospitals should also define the individual work practices that will be required to detect the introduction of a patient with Ebola, prevent spread, and manage the impact on patients, the hospital, and staff.
CHARACTERI-SATION OF
NOVELENTEROVIRUSES
(From Piralla A et al., PLoS One 2013)
MERS-CoV
• Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus• Formerly called novel coronavirus
• Not the same coronovirus that caused SARS• Newly identified virus, causes severe acute respiratory
illness – first seen in April 2012• 54 cases, including 30 deaths (55.6%) to date• 8 countries, with 72% in Saudi Arabia• No cases in U.S.• Can spread from person to person during close contact
• Families• Healthcare
Countries Cases (Deaths)
France 2 (1)
Italy 3 (0)
Jordan 2 (2)
Qatar 2 (0)
Saudi Arabia 39 (24)
Tunisia 2 (0)
United Kingdom (UK) 3 (2)
United Arab Emirates (UAE) 1 (1)
Total 54 (30)
MERS Cases and Deaths, April 2012 - June 2013 Current as of June 4, 2013
Euro Surveill. 2013 Aug 22;18(34). pii: 20564.Investigation of an imported case of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection in Florence, Italy, May to June 2013.Puzelli S, Azzi A, Santini M, Di Martino A, Facchini M, Castrucci M, Meola M, Arvia R, Corcioli F, Pierucci F, Baretti S, Bartoloni A, Bartolozzi D, de Martino M, Galli L, Pompa M, Rezza G, Balocchini E, Donatelli I.
CORONAVIRUS HKU1 IDENTIFIED IN AN ITALIAN INFANT WITH
BRONCHIOLITIS
N P It a ly H K U 1 A Y 5 9 7 0 1 1 H K U 1 N C 0 0 6 5 7 7 O C 4 3
S A R S N L 6 3 A m s te r d a m
2 2 9 E1 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
0 .0 5
H K U 1 A Y 5 9 7 0 1 1 H K U 1 N C 0 0 6 5 7 7 S g e n e It a ly
O C 4 3 S A R S
N L 6 3 A m s t e r d a m 2 2 9 E1 0 0
1 0 0
7 41 0 0
0 . 1
Bosis S et al. J Clin Virol 2006
THE RESPECTIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF HOST AND MICROBE GENETICS ON THE CLINICAL OUTCOME OF
INFECTIOUS DISEASES(From Casanova JL and Abel L. Ann Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013)
A PROPOSED AGE-DEPENDENT GENETICARCHITECTURE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
(From Casanova JL and Abel L. Ann Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013)
MAIN STUDIES DEMONSTRATING ASSOCIATION BETWEEN TLR4 POLYMORPHISMS AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES
GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS AND RISK OF INFECTIOUS WHEEZING IN
PEDIATRIC AGE(Esposito et al., BMC Infect Dis 2014)
This study has been planned to evaluate whethermodifications of some genes involved in the regulationof innate or adaptive immunity can favor repeated
viral infections that induce persistent airwaymodifications and chronic severe respiratory disease
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studypopulation at the time of the first wheezing episode
Characteristics Control group
(n=119)
Childrenwith
wheezing(n=119)
P-value
Childrenwith non-recurrentwheezing(=45)
Childrenwith
recurrentwheezing(n=74)
P-value
Females, n (%) 43 (36.1) 43 (36.1) 1.00 16 (35.6) 27 (36.5) 0.92
Median age (range), months 6 (0.3-12) 6 (0.3-12) 1.00 6 (0.3-12) 6 (0.3-12) 1.00
Caucasian, n (%) 113 (95.0) 113 (95.0) 1.00 42 (93.3) 71 (95.5) 0.67
Median gestational age (range), weeks
38.3 (37-41) 38.1 (37-41) 0.97 38.2 (37-41)
37.6 (37-40) 0.94
Subjects breastfed ≥3 months, n (%)
82 (68.9) 73 (61.3) 0.27 29 (64.4) 44 (59.5) 0.72
Subjects regularly using pacifier, n (%)
30 (25.2) 31 (26.1) 1.00 10 (22.2) 21 (28.4) 0.59
Subjects with at least one oldersibling, n (%)
28 (23.5) 33 (27.7) 0.55 12 (26.7) 21 (28.4) 0.99
Subjects exposed to cigarettesmoke, n (%)
55 (46.2) 79 (66.4) 0.002 26 (57.8) 53 (71.6) 0.17
Subjects with high IgE level, n (%)
11 (9.2) 76 (63.9) <0.001 24 (53.3) 52 (70.3) 0.09
Subjects with family history of atopy, n (%)
24 (20.2) 85 (71.4) <0.001 24 (53.3) 61 (82.4) 0.001
Genotype frequencies of selected SNPs in controlsand in children with wheezing (I)
Gene and polymorphic alleles
Control group
(n=119)
N %
Childrenwith
wheezing(n=119)N %
Control group
(n=119)
N %
Childrenwith
wheezing(n= 119)
N %
HWE, Χ2
ControlsP-value
HWE, Χ2
WheezingP-value
ORb 95% CI P-value
IL8‐rs4073AA/TT
28 23.747 39.843 36.4
21 17.857 48.340 33.9
22.5 19.058.0 49.237.5 31.8
20.8 17.657.5 48.739.8 33.7 0.04 0.93
1.002.501.57
(reference)(1.15‐5.44)(0.71‐3.45)
‐0.020.27
VEGFA‐rs833058CC/TT
32 27.160 50.926 22.0
22 18.572 60.5 25 21.0
32.6 27.658.8 49.926.6 22.5
28.3 23.859.5 50.031.3 26.3 0.83 0.02
1.002.221.96
(reference)(1.09‐4.55)(0.83‐4.65)
‐0.03O.13
MBL2‐rs1800450CC/TT
87 73.729 24.62 1.7
76 63.940 33.63 2.5
87.3 74.028.4 24.12.3 2.0
77.4 65.137.1 31.24.4 3.7 0.81 0.40
1.001.901.03
(reference)(1.01‐3.58)(0.15‐7.239
‐0.050.97
IKBKB‐rs3747811AA/TT
36 31.342 36.537 32.2
20 17.167 57.330 25.6
28.3 24.657.5 50.029.3 25.4
24.5 20.958.1 49.634.5 29.5 0.004 0.10
1.003.262.01
(reference)(1.55‐6.85)(0.89‐4.53)
‐0.00180.09
Genotype frequencies of selected SNPs in controlsand in children with bronchospasm (II)
Gene and polymorphicalleles
Control group
(n=119)
N %
Childrenwith
wheezing(n=119)N %
Control group
(n=119)
N %
Childrenwith
wheezing(n= 119)
N %
HWE, Χ2
ControlsP-value
HWE, Χ2
WheezingP-value
ORb 95% CI P-value
CTLA4‐rs3087243AA/GG
25 21.273 61.920 17.0
35 29.760 50.923 19.5
32.1 27.258.9 49.927.1 22.9
35.8 30.358.4 49.523.8 20.2 0.009 0.76
1.000.500.65
(reference)(0.25‐0.99)(0.27‐1.56)
‐0.050.34
NFKBIB‐rs3136642CC/TT
64 54.240 33.914 11.9
72 61.039 33.1 7 5.9
59.8 50.748.4 41.09.8 8.3
71.0 60.141.1 34.86.0 5.0 0.06 0.58
1.000.900.33
(reference)(0.49‐0.66)(0.11‐0.94)
‐0.730.04
Genotype frequencies of selected SNPs with significant differences in children with recurrent
or non-recurrent wheezingGene and
polymorphic alleles
Non-recurrent (n=74)
N %
Recurrentwheezing(n=119)
N %
Non recurrent(n=74)
N %
Recurrentwheezing(n= 119)
N %
HWE, Χ2
ControlsP-value
HWE, Χ2
WheezingP-value
ORb 95% CI P-value
IL8‐rs4073AA/TT
17 23.326 35.630 41.1
4 8.931 68.910 22.2
12.3 16.935.3 48.425.3 34.7
8.5 18.822.1 49.115.5 32.1 0.02 0.007
1.003.601.18
(reference)(1.03‐12.57)
(0.31‐4.51)
‐0.040.81
VEGFA‐rs2146323AA/CC
4 5.437 50.033 44.6
8 17.819 42.2 18 40.0
6.8 9.231.3 42.335.8 48.4
6.8 15.121.4 47.516.8 37.3 0.12 0.45
4.321.081.96
(1.06‐17.64)
(0.46‐2.54)(reference)
0.040.85‐
TLR3‐rs3775291TT/CC
10 13.731 42.532 43.8
4 8.913 28.928 62.2
8.9 12.233.2 45.130.9 42.3
2.5 5.4 16.1 35.826.5 58.8 0.57 0.20
0.750.361.00
(0.20‐2.75)(0.14‐0.90)(reference)
0.660.031.00
NFKBIA‐rs2233419AA/GG
5 6.814 18.955 74.3
2 4.416 35.627 60.0
1.9 2.620.1 27.251.9 70.2
2.2 4.915.6 34.627.2 60.5 0.009 0.85
0.822.791.00
(0.13‐5.05)(1.12‐6.99)(reference)
0.830.03‐
Frequency distribution of viral infections in children with recurrent or non-recurrent wheezing
Viral infection N % N % P-valueRSVNoYes
2153
28.471.6
2223
48.951.1 0.02
RV (any type)No Yes
5915
79.720.3
3312
73.326.7 0.42
EnterovirusNoYes
704
94.65.4
378
82.217.8 0.055
Coronavirus (any type)NoYes
713
96.04.0
432
95.64.4 1.00
MetapneumovirusNoYes
686
91.98.1
432
95.64.4 0.71
BocavirusNoYes
722
97.32.7
432
95.64.4 0.63
Influenza (any type)NoYes
722
97.32.7
441
97.82.2 1.00
Parainfluenza (any type)NoYes
722
97.32.7
450
100.00.0 0.53
Any viral infectionNoYes
767
9.590.5
837
17.882.2 0.18
Non-recurrent wheezing (n=74) Recurrent wheezing (n=45)
GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION
• Rhinovirus significantly associated with recurrent wheezing in the presence of IL4Ra-rs1801275GG and G (OR 6.03, 95% CI: 1.21-30.10, p=0.03) and MAP3K1-rs702689AA (OR 4.09, 95% CI: 1.14-14.61, p=0.03)
• No significant difference observed in the distribution of genetic polymorphisms among the children with RSV or other viral infections and non-recurrent or recurrent wheezing
CONCLUSIONS
• This study shows a relationship between the riskof wheezing and polymorphisms of some of the genes involved in the immune response
• Susceptibility to the development of wheezing seems to be greater in children with SNPs of the IL8 (rs4073AT), VEGFA (rs833058CT), MBL2 (rs1800450CT) and IKBKB genes (rs3747811AT)
• Despite not conclusive, these results indicate thatgenetics play an important role in conditioningwheezing development
• Further studies are needed in order to establishwhich are the real association between wheezingdevelopment and genetic variations
2003 pre-clinical trials 2010
New species of Ebola - Bundibugyo - emerged in 2007 Experimental vaccines being developed against other
lethal Ebola species found to totally protected against it did not stimulate antibodies against the new species protection depended entirely on cellular immunity
"The dogma is that viruses require an antibody response to prevent the virus from entering the cell," Sullivan says. "This is truly the first time that cell-mediated immunity alone has been shown to be protective against virus infection.“
Vaccine Trials in the News… Ebola
Study Design 8 macaques – 4 vaccinated / 4 unvaccinated All inoculated with lethal doses of Ebola Vaccinated animals survived, Unvaccinated animals died
Vaccine pieces of the Zaire & Sudan viruses’ protein-sugar coat
(glycoprotein) inserted into a type of common cold virus The cold virus carries the Ebola glycoprotein into cells of
the vaccine recipients 4 "priming" shots, followed a year later with a booster
“There's no way to do trials of Ebola vaccines in humans. Unlike, say, a vaccine for HIV, there's no identifiable group of people at risk for Ebola...”
Vaccine Trials in the News… Ebola
2009: 3rd largest AIDS vaccine trial to date Cost the US government $105 M Largest done in humans: >16,000 participants
Controversy: Combination of 2 vaccines that each failed
when tested for use individually 2004 editorial in Science signed by 22 top
AIDS researchers: Suggested trial was a waste of $$
Vaccine Trials in the News… HIV
NPR: AIDS Vaccine Prevents Some HIV Infections
HIV Vaccine
Vaccines Tested: Sanofi-Aventis Alvac-HIV
Carrier vaccine Canarypox virus with 3 AIDS virus genes grafted
onto it Stimulate cell mediated immunity
Genentech Aidsvax Non-infectious sub-unit vaccine Contains two recombinant gp120 proteins found
on surface of different strains of HIV virus Stimulate anti-body mediated immunity
Dangers of Vaccine Trials
Most researchers feel first HIV vaccines will not be more than 40-50% effective Will vaccinated individuals engage in higher
risk behaviors? Vaccine could cause as much harm as it
prevents http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?s
toryId=113177004
Future vaccines cannot be tested against placebo, would be unethical
RSV AS CAUSE OF ACUTE
RESPIRATORYILLNESS AND BRONCHIO-LITIS IN HOSPITAL
AND EMERGENCY
DEPARTMENTS
(From Borchers AT et al., Clin Rev Allergol
Immunol 2013)
TESTED APPROACHES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF RSV VACCINES
Production of live attenuated cold-passaged and temperature sensitive mutants
Creation of recombinant RSV virus with deletionsof one or more virus proteins or expressing hostcytokines in order to boost vaccine response
Vectored vaccines Use of adjuvants, including TLR9 and NOD2 ligands
REVIEW OF STUDIES EXAMINING PREVALENCEOF NOROVIRUS AMONG OUTBREAKS OF
GASTROENTERITIS FROM ALL ETIOLOGIES(From Patel MM et al., J Clin Virol 2009)
EFFICACY OF AN INTRANASALLY DELIVEREDNOROVIRUS VIRUS-LIKE PARTICLE VACCINE (I)
(From Atmar RL at al., N Engl J Med 2011)
EFFICACY OF AN INTRANASALLY DELIVEREDNOROVIRUS VIRUS-LIKE PARTICLE VACCINE
(II)(From Atmar RL at al., N Engl J Med 2011)
CONCLUSIONS• Viral infectious diseases have an important burden
on childhood health
• Old and new viruses have a significant role ascause of disease
• Genetics seem to have an important role in conditioning susceptibility and/or severity to specific infections
• Interesting new vaccines are in development
BOARDSusanna Esposito (Milan, Italy), President
Francesco Blasi (Milan, Italy)Kathryn Edwards (Vanderbilt, USA)
Ivan Hung (Hong Kong, China)Irja Lutsar (Tallin, Estonia)
Shabir Madhi (Johannesburg, South Africa)Miguel O’Ryan (Santiago, Chile)
Albert Osterhaus (Rotterdam, The Netherlands)Yehuda Shoenfeld (Tel-Hashomer, Israel)
Tina Tan (Chicago, USA)www.waidid.org