responding to chaos: a brief history of sociology
DESCRIPTION
A tradition of skepticism…. Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology. In early history, people focused their efforts on gaining an understanding of the physical world. Inquiries into the physical world. Ptolemy, 2 nd century BCE Copernicus, 1500s CE Galileo, 1600s Newton, 1600s - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
RESPONDING TO CHAOS: A BRIEF HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY
A tradition of skepticism…
![Page 2: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
In early history, people focused their efforts on gaining an understanding of the physical world.
![Page 3: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Inquiries into the physical world
Ptolemy, 2nd century BCE
Copernicus, 1500s CE Galileo, 1600s Newton, 1600s
His laws explained the movement of everything visible in the universe
But the church maintained that it was God who controlled the social world
![Page 4: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
But then people started to speculate that maybe the mysteries of the social world could also be examined in a scientific way!
![Page 5: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
First attempt: Auguste Comte, 1798-1857
1842- coined the term sociology
Argued people no longer understood the way things ought to be
Believed human greed and selfishness resulted in social chaos
Humans suffered from “intellectual anarchy”
![Page 6: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
First attempt: Auguste Comte, 1798-1857
Believed social chaos would be overcome when people accepted that knowledge should be based on scientific principles.
Sociologists would use the scientific method and advise people about how to live.
![Page 7: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Origins of Modern Sociology: France’s Emile Durkheim
Even a society filled with selfish people would together because we need each other to survive.
“Collective conscience” Worked for pre-modern
societies Modern society was
different
![Page 8: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Origins of Modern Sociology: France’s Emile Durkheim, 1858-1917
In pre-modern society, people had been held together because of their likeness, but in modern society, held together by differences.
![Page 9: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Origins of Modern Sociology: France’s Emile Durkheim
Paradox: In modern society
we want to be free but have no choice but to keep social ties
Society’s structure forces us to interact
![Page 10: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Origins of Modern Sociology: France’s Emile Durkheim
Must focus on the nature of society itself! Social phenomena do
exist! Social patterns do
exist! Social facts do exist! Thus, his definition of
sociology: the scientific study of social facts.
Durkheim’s definition of “social facts”- manners of acting, thinking, and feeling, external to the individual, which are invested with a coercive power by virtue which they exercise control over him.
![Page 11: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
“social facts”- manners of acting, thinking, and feeling, external to the individual, which are invested with a coercive power by virtue which they exercise control over him.Test this definition!
Partner up and discuss:
Are norms truly social facts? Test this for yourself. Does the rule or norm that one must wear clothing to class qualify as a social fact according to Durkheim’s definition? Explain why or why not.
![Page 12: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Origins of Modern Sociology: Germany
Ferdinand Tonnies, 1855-1936 Agreed with
Durkheim but with a twist: he wanted to understand how social relationships between people differed in pre-modern and modern societies
![Page 13: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Tonnies concluded there are two categories of social relationships:“Gemeinschaft” “Gesellschaft” Communal relationships Social relationships that
people enter into as ends in and of themselves
For emotional reasons He thought pre-modern
society was more like this.
Goal-driven relationships Social relationships that
people enter into as means to specific ends
For the purpose of achieving a goal
He thought modern society was more like this.
Thus, the type of the relationship determines the rules of the relationship!
![Page 14: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Test these definitions!Partner up and discuss: Which of the following types of relationships are most likely to be gemeinschaft? What about gesellschaft?a. Friend-friendb. Wife-husbandc. Doctor-patientd. Retailer- customere. Minister- parishionerf. Parent-childg. Worker-boss
![Page 15: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Challenge question:Generally, the banker-client relationship in modern society is gesellschaft. Yet, from watching television advertisements for banks, one might conclude that the banker-client relationship is supposed to be gemeinschaft. For example, many banks seem to make a big deal of claiming to be “friendly bankers” or “good neighbors.”Why would banks promote their services as gemeinschaft rather than gesellschaft?What, if any, danger is there in thinking of your relationship with your banker as gemeinschaft when it is really gesellschaft?
![Page 16: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Origins of Modern Sociology: Germany
Max Weber, 1864-1920 Liked Tonnies ideas
about motives “Rational behavior:”
seeing each other as means to an end; rational as “calculating”
![Page 17: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Individual think time:
Think about two things you do for what Weber would call rational reasons? In what respect are your motives rational?
Consider the flip side. Think about two things you do for what Weber might consider non-rational reasons? In what respect are your motives non-rational?
![Page 18: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Weber observed that people choose efficient, rational behaviors in modern society.
Also observed that “society” looks down upon those who simply do things for enjoyment (non-rational).
Weber wanted to know why society seemed to drive us toward “rational” behaviors
![Page 19: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Origins of Modern Sociology: Germany
Karl Marx Did not see himself
as a sociologist! But, sociologists
rank him as completely influential Economics mattered Class distinctions
mattered Economics was the
driving force behind social decisions
Hence, a sociologist!
![Page 20: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Origins of Modern Sociology: England
Herbert Spencer, 1820-1903 Believed societies
evolved His work published six
years BEFORE Darwin’s
“Social Darwinism” Survival of the fittest
Can be deadly premise
His bottom line: the competition to survive will be won by “the best”
![Page 21: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Sociology in the United States
US role in the field came later than Europe 1st course at Yale 1st sociology dept.
at University of Chicago, 1892
American Sociological Association, 1905
![Page 22: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Sociology in the United States
Different approach Not focused on
theories Focused on solving
specific social problems Jane Addams
Social welfare reform (Hull House)
W.E.B. DuBois Racial inequalities &
ethnic differences Wrote to expose injustices
in order to remedy them
![Page 23: Responding to Chaos: A Brief History of Sociology](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816712550346895ddb7d0c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The Place of Sociology in Modern Society
Evolved to prominence by the end of the 19th century
Social world viewed as worthy of study
By using scientific tools we could make sense of the social world.
Skepticism continues today…