responding to floods in pakistan 2011 - 2012
TRANSCRIPT
DFID – Pakistan:
How we respond to major floods in Pakistan
2011 to 2013
What is resilience in this context?
Can we help these people to become resilient to future floods?
2,27
3,72
3
3,75
0,00
0
3,00
0,00
0
4,20
0,00
0
5,60
0,00
0
3,20
0,00
0
Scale and comparisons
Recent FLOODS In Pakistan:
2010: 20m 2011: 8m 2012: 5m
Challenges and priorities
• The problem of design (= vulnerability)
• Social fabric strong (happy people)
• Pre-existing poverty
• Do no Harm!
• Build on lessons from 2010, etc.
• Livelihoods: deeper into debt. What to do?
• Deal with emergency first
Often destruction starts from the roof-down
Both katcha (mud) and pukka (brick) houses collapsed These were built with international donor funds, and will all have to be taken down and rebuilt.
Large tent, £130 - £180 range. Limited adaptability – can’t be used to reconstruct the home.
And expensive!
An overview of “conventional” response
£18 / Unit
Cheap but not very good (not much protection and dignity)
Cheaper tent (£100)
Pretty useless though…
In contrast – a DFID / IOM designed family shelter
£60 / family – including a solar light
Whole families: better protection, enhanced dignity
The “Roofing Kit” idea
• £58 per unit
• Used as temporary shelter
• Later to build a roof
• Double the value of a tent
• And half the price
Roofing kit as seen from outside
Double value kit = good VfM
Hasheema is home and dry
Keila, mother of four, built walls by herself Says “this is so much better than a tent”
Mustafa, project manager for HANDS, discussing options to further reinforce the walls so this house will be more flood resistant.
Overall Results Emergency shelter:
• 300,000 people reached
• (45,000 families)
• At cost of £3.4m
• or £11 per person.
Solar lights
OK but what does it mean? Research: Protection for women? Economic savings? Potential for small businesses? Ref. Grameen Shahkti - Bangladesh
Next phase:
Flood Resistant Shelters
Criteria:
• Low cost – replicable
• Respect local vernacular
• Must be flood resistant
Design improvement # 1:
• Extended roof eaves
Thick walls with LIME
Lime is the key
• Flood resistant for 5,000 years
• Good local production
• Cheap
• Sukkur Barrage & Rome
– as evidence
• Leading experts as advisors
Hydraulic lime goes hard underwater. So let’s use it in the foundations and walls!
People build their own homes: bring training to them
Raise the level of the house
Keep what works well
Offer training on range of different designs
Engage whole communities:
• CBOs • Conditional cash transfers • The ability to listen
Before and after
If we do nothing – what really happens?
Key results – durable shelters
• 45,000 families (c.300,000 people) in durable homes
• £11m invested
• Equals £260 per family (all costs)
• Compares with £3,500 per family in Aceh
• Or £1,800 per family Punjab / Sindh Govt.
Livelihoods:
41,000 families helped to
avoid debt for wheat crop
87,000 families are helped
to start kitchen gardens
WHAT IMPACT?
Household economy
Cash helped
But cash can’t build
resilience
80 to 100% spend on
FOOD
Huge food price
increases!
“We don’t grow our own
vegetables”
“Of course we’d like to
learn”
Kitchen gardens – introducing for the first time, focusing on women.
The rationale for “joined-up programmes” – Shelter, WASH, Livelihoods – to build resilience
What next?
• Bring the Government on board
• Research and building evidence – 2010 to now
• Engage academia
• Validate the best strategy (VfM, technical)
• Link into the broader resilience strategy
• Innovate, test, research, validate
Poorly designed
overflow from septic
tanks
A common sight all over
Pakistan
A serious public health
problem has been
created, not resolved.
This series of pictures portrays normal village life in many villages in Pakistan and how, with community mobilisation and low-cost, appropriate design, the transformation that could be achieved. This need cost no more than conventional WASH and early recovery projects.
Slide 1: A normal village in Sindh: little shade in the extreme heat, no kitchen gardens, high malnutrition, poor health and hygiene, deforestation, denuded environment, etc.
Residual water from hand-pump
lying stagnant
Overflow from septic tanks creating disease
With lack of fodder, goats roam free and eat
emerging trees and plants
Slide 2: Hand-pump residual water directed to sunken “sponge” gardens, planted with bananas or other species; septic tanks linked to constructed wetlands; key tree species planted, rainwater collection initiated.
Slide 3: Goats enclosed and controlled. Sunken beds below hand-pumps planted. Kitchen gardens have started; constructed wetland for septic tank operational; specific native trees planted around the compound, including mango / other fruits, neem and moringa species for multiple nutritional and health benefits.
Concept: DFID Illustration and artwork: UNHABITAT
3 to 5 years on, Moringa trees providing fodder for animals,
increasing milk production by up to 50% and weight gain < 35% While providing multiple nutritional and health benefits for people
Kitchen gardens saving 30 – 50% people’s income on food while improving nutrition
Constructed wetland system provides complete treatment for sewage waste while providing habitat for bamboo and other useful species
Increased shade, wind and flood protection, better hygiene, sanitation and nutrition, household income boosted. Overall resilience enhanced.