response spectrum by egyptian code seismic load

Upload: asmasm123

Post on 14-Apr-2018

273 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    1/21

    ASSIGNMENT NO. 2

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Date : 24-Nov-2010

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    2/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 2 of 21

    Q2. Draw the following curves in [Sae-T] and [Sae-Sde ] formats for both

    response spectrum and Design Spectrum (Steel Frame with Welded

    Connections)

    Curve 1: All Soil Classes for ag=0.15g

    Curve 2: All Soil Classes for ag=0.3g

    Curve 3: All Design Ground Accelerations for Soil Class C

    Curve 4: All Design Ground Accelerations for Soil Class B

    Q3. Solve Question-of Exam-2009

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    3/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 3 of 21

    Solution

    Q2. Show below figures

    Curve 1: All Soil Classes for ag=0.15g

    Figure: Elastic Spectral Acc. VS. Period T for all type of soil

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1.1

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2

    Elastic

    SpectralAcc.

    Sed

    (g)

    Period T (Sec.)

    Acc. Spectrum (Elastic)

    ag =0.15g , =1.2

    Soil Class A

    Soil Class B

    Soil Class C

    Soil Class D

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    4/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 4 of 21

    Figure: Design Spectral Acc. VS. Period T for all type of soil

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2

    Design

    SpectralAcc.

    Sad

    (g)

    Period T (Sec.)

    Acc. Spectrum (Design)

    ag =0.15g , =1.2

    Soil Class A

    Soil Class B

    Soil Class C

    Soil Class D

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    5/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 5 of 21

    Figure: Elastic Spectral Acc. VS. Elastic Spectral Disp. for all

    type of soil

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1.1

    0.0000 0.0010 0.0020 0.0030 0.0040 0.0050 0.0060 0.0070 0.0080 0.0090 0.0100

    ElasticSpectralA

    cc.

    Sae

    (g)

    Elastic Spectral Disp. Sde (m)

    Acc. Spectrum (Elastic)

    ag =0.15g , =1.2

    Soil Class A

    Soil Class B

    Soil Class C

    Soil Class D

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    6/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 6 of 21

    Figure: Design Spectral Acc. VS. Design Spectral Disp. for all

    type of soil

    Curve 2: All Soil Classes for ag=0.3g

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.0000 0.0020 0.0040 0.0060 0.0080 0.0100 0.0120 0.0140 0.0160

    Design

    Spec

    tralAcc.

    Sad

    (g)

    Design Spectral Disp. Sdd (m)

    Acc. Spectrum (Design)

    ag =0.15g , =1.2

    Soil Class A

    Soil Class B

    Soil Class C

    Soil Class D

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    7/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 7 of 21

    Figure: Elastic Spectral Acc. VS. Period T for all type of soil

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2

    2.2

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2

    ElasticSpectralAcc.

    Sed

    (g)

    Period T (Sec.)

    Acc. Spectrum (Elastic)

    ag =0.3g , =1.2

    Soil Class A

    Soil Class B

    Soil Class C

    Soil Class D

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    8/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 8 of 21

    Figure: Design Spectral Acc. VS. Period T for all type of soil

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2

    Design

    Spectr

    alAcc.

    Sad

    (g)

    Period T (Sec.)

    Acc. Spectrum (Design)ag =0.3g , =1.2

    Soil Class A

    Soil Class B

    Soil Class C

    Soil Class D

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    9/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 9 of 21

    Figure: Elastic Spectral Acc. VS. Elastic Spectral Disp. for all

    type of soil

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2

    2.2

    0.0000 0.0050 0.0100 0.0150 0.0200

    ElasticSpectralAcc.

    Sae

    (g)

    Elastic Spectral Disp. Sde (m)

    Acc. Spectrum (Elastic)ag =0.3g , =1.2

    Soil Class A

    Soil Class B

    Soil Class C

    Soil Class D

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    10/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 10 of 21

    Figure: Design Spectral Acc. VS. Design Spectral Disp. for all

    type of soil

    Curve 3: All Design Ground Accelerations for Soil Class C

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.0000 0.0050 0.0100 0.0150 0.0200 0.0250 0.0300 0.0350

    Design

    Spec

    tralAcc.

    Sad

    (g)

    Design Spectral Disp. Sdd (m)

    Acc. Spectrum (Design)

    ag =0.3g , =1.2

    Soil Class A

    Soil Class B

    Soil Class C

    Soil Class D

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    11/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 11 of 21

    Figure: Elastic Spectral Acc. VS. Period T for all ground acc.

    type of soil C

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2

    Elastic

    SpectralAcc.

    Sed

    (g)

    Period T (Sec.)

    Acc. Spectrum (Elastic)

    Soil Class C , =1.2

    Region 1

    Region 2

    Region 3

    Region 4

    Region 5.a

    Region 5.b

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    12/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 12 of 21

    Figure: Design Spectral Acc. VS. Period T for all ground acc.type of soil C

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2

    Design

    Sp

    ectralAcc.

    Sad

    (g)

    Period T (Sec.)

    Acc. Spectrum (Design)

    Soil Class C , =1.2

    Region 1

    Region 2

    Region 3

    Region 4

    Region 5.a

    Region 5.b

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    13/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 13 of 21

    Figure: Elastic Spectral Acc. VS. Elastic Spectral Disp. for all

    ground acc. type of soil C

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    0.0000 0.0020 0.0040 0.0060 0.0080 0.0100 0.0120 0.0140

    ElasticSp

    ectralAcc.

    Sae

    (g)

    Elastic Spectral Disp. Sde (m)

    Acc. Spectrum (Elastic)

    Soil Class C , =1.2

    Region 1

    Region 2

    Region 3

    Region 4

    Region 5.a

    Region 5.b

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    14/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 14 of 21

    Figure: Design Spectral Acc. VS. Design Spectral Disp. for all

    ground acc. type of soil C

    Curve 4: All Design Ground Accelerations for Soil Class B

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.0000 0.0050 0.0100 0.0150 0.0200 0.0250 0.0300 0.0350

    Design

    Sp

    ectralAcc.

    Sad

    (g)

    Design Spectral Disp. Sdd (m)

    Acc. Spectrum (Design)

    Soil Class C , =1.2

    Region 1

    Region 2

    Region 3

    Region 4

    Region 5.a

    Region 5.b

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    15/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 15 of 21

    Figure: Elastic Spectral Acc. VS. Period T for all ground acc.

    type of soil B

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2

    Elastic

    SpectralAcc.

    Sed

    (g)

    Period T (Sec.)

    Acc. Spectrum (Elastic)

    Soil Class B , =1.2

    Region 1

    Region 2

    Region 3

    Region 4

    Region 5.a

    Region 5.b

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    16/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 16 of 21

    Figure: Design Spectral Acc. VS. Period T for all ground acc.

    type of soil B

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3 3.3 3.6 3.9 4.2

    Design

    SpectralAcc.

    Sad

    (g)

    Period T (Sec.)

    Acc. Spectrum (Design)

    Soil Class B , =1.2

    Region 1

    Region 2

    Region 3

    Region 4

    Region 5.a

    Region 5.b

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    17/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 17 of 21

    Figure: Elastic Spectral Acc. VS. Elastic Spectral Disp. for all

    ground acc. type of soil B

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    0.0000 0.0020 0.0040 0.0060 0.0080 0.0100 0.0120

    ElasticSpectralAcc.

    Sae

    (g)

    Elastic Spectral Disp. Sde (m)

    Acc. Spectrum (Elastic)

    Soil Class B , =1.2

    Region 1

    Region 2

    Region 3

    Region 4

    Region 5.a

    Region 5.b

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    18/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 18 of 21

    Figure: Design Spectral Acc. VS. Design Spectral Disp. for all

    ground acc. type of soil B

    Q3.1-Estimation Wind Force F4 according to ANSI

    Basic wind speed (3-sec gust speed) = 100 mph = 44.704 m/s

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.0000 0.0050 0.0100 0.0150 0.0200 0.0250 0.0300 0.0350

    DesignS

    pectralAcc.

    Sad

    (g)

    Design Spectral Disp. Sdd (m)

    Acc. Spectrum (Design)

    Soil Class B , =1.2

    Region 1

    Region 2

    Region 3

    Region 4

    Region 5.a

    Region 5.b

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    19/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 19 of 21

    Important factor (Structure category) I = 1.07

    Terrain exposure constant : for terrain exposure B

    = 4.5 Zg = 1200 ft = 365.76 m Do = 0.01

    Kz = 2.58 ( Z / Zg )1/

    qz = 0.613 Kz ( V I )2 ( N/m2 )

    = 0.613 Kz * ( 1.07 * 44.704 )2 ( N/m2 )

    Guest Factor G is calculated accord. ANSI as shown below.

    B = 15m building width

    h = 75m building height

    H / B =75 / 15 = 5.0 So,building is rigid

    Tz =. ( )

    .

    (

    .)

    . ( . ).

    (

    .)

    = 0.1472

    G = 0.65 + 3.65 Tz

    = 1.18736

    L / B = 25 / 25 = 1.0

    Cp = 0.8 for windward wall

    Cp = -0.5 for leeward wall

    Wind On building :-

    Floor

    NO.

    Z

    ( m )KZ I

    qz( N/m2 )

    Cp

    (front+rear)Gh

    Pz( N/m2 )

    5TH

    75 1.81 1.07 2544.6 1.3 1.1874 3928

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    20/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 20 of 21

    4th

    60 1.73 1.07 2421.5 1.3 1.1874 3738

    3rd

    45 1.62 1.07 2271.5 1.3 1.1874 3506

    AVG. 3724

    Wind Force F4 = ( 3928+2*3738+3506 ) /4 * 25 * 15 /1000 = 1398 KN

    Q3.2-Distributing Wind Force F4 = 1396 KN

    By Upper Limit ( Rigid Diaphram )

    Distribution is according to stiffness

    Force in bracing at axis 1 or 3 = 8 / (8+1+8) * 1398 = 657.9 KN

    Force in frame at axis 2 = 1 / (8+1+8) * 1398 = 82.2 KN

    By Lower Limit ( NO-Diaphram )

    Distribution is according to served area

    Force in bracing at axis 1 or 3 = 1 / 4 * 1398 = 350 KN

    Force in frame at axis 2 = 1 / 2 * 1398 = 699 KN

    Q3.3-a. Seismic force according to Egypt code for loads

    Check time period 0.8 sec 2.0 sec & 4 Tc (Tc atleast 0.25 ),and regular horizontal plan with regular vertical elevations.

    So, Use simplified modal response spectrum method

    Fb = Sd ( T1 ) . W / g

    Where :-Sd ( T1 ) is design spectrum acceleration calculated for time period =0.8 sec- = 1.0 for T1 > 2.0 Tc

  • 7/29/2019 Response Spectrum by Egyptian Code Seismic Load

    21/21

    Numerical Analysis Assignment NO.2 24-NOV-2010

    Prepared By: Ahmed Shaban Mahmoud

    Page 21 of 21

    -W/g is total mass of building

    Distribution of force Fb may based first mode shape and may be by assuminglinear displacement over hight.

    Fi =(

    ,

    ) * Fb

    F4 =(

    ( )) * Fb = 0.267 * Fb

    Q3.3-b. Distribution Seismic force F4 = 1396 KN

    -By Upper Limit ( Rigid Diaphram )

    Force applied at centre of mass (almost centre of plan) which is

    same of centre of area

    So, No changes in distribution than in item 2 above

    -By Lower Limit ( NO-Diaphram )

    Distribution is according to served mass

    Each system served mass as same ratio of served wind area.

    So, No changes in distribution than in item 2 above