response to recommendation on magnet · 2018. 3. 24. · draft recommendation based on scientific...
TRANSCRIPT
ResponsetoRecommendationonMagnet
Sergio Bertolucci University of Bologna and INFN
Basedontheworkof:P.Bernardini,S.Biagi,C.Distefano,N.Mauri,M.Pozzato,P.Sala,A.Surdo,M.Tenti,F.Terranova,s.b.
Draft Recommendation
Basedonscientificconsiderations,theDUNENearDetectorConceptStudyrecommendtoanew-builddipolemagnetforthemulti-purposespectrometerdownstreamoftheLiquid-argonTPC(LArTPC).
24/03/18 2
ArgonCube Fiducial Volume
X(mm)
Z(mm) Z(mm)
Y(mm)
24/03/18 3
The destiny of a muon
24/03/18 4
6m
5m
ArgonCube
6m
5mArgonCube
z
x
z
y
Δy=0.5mcontained
contained
sideexitsideexit
enteringtrackingvolume
enteringtrackingvolumefrontlargeangle
frontlargeangle
ν
ν
Muon acceptance
24/03/18 5Muonmomentum(GeV/c) Muonmomentum(GeV/c)
acceptance
Similar conclusion in the draft recommendation
24/03/18 6
Internal tracker
• Additionaltrackerinthespacebetweenyokeandcryostatstt
24/03/18 7
A very crude muon ranger
Measurekineticenergyofescapingmuonsthroughrange• 10ironslabs(10cmthick)aroundACwithinterleavedtrackers(5cm)toconnectthetracksemergingfromAC
24/03/18 8µ ArgonCube
Ironslabs&tracker
Acceptance
24/03/18 9
AllµfromACfiducialvol.StopinACStopinMuonRangerStopinYokeStopinCryoStopinCaloSTT
zoom
Kineticenergy(GeV)Kineticenergy(GeV)
} Stop+STT
Acceptance (Monte Carlo truth)
24/03/18 10
Acceptance=(Stop+STT)/(allµfromACfiducialvol.)
Truekineticenergy(GeV)
Acceptance
Muon momentum reconstruction: µ stopping in AC (∼ 21%)
24/03/18 11
Truekineticenergy(GeV) Truekineticenergy(GeV)
Recokineticene
rgy(GeV
)
µ stopping in the muon ranger (∼ 47%)
24/03/18 12Truekineticenergy(GeV)Truekineticenergy(GeV)
Recokineticene
rgy(GeV
)
Stopping in Yoke (∼ 5%)
24/03/18 13
Truekineticenergy(GeV)Truekineticenergy(GeV)
Recokineticene
rgy(GeV
)
Stopping in the cryostat (∼ 0.7%)
24/03/18 14Truekineticenergy(GeV)Truekineticenergy(GeV)
Recokineticene
rgy(GeV
)
24/03/18 15Truekineticenergy(GeV)Truekineticenergy(GeV)
Recokineticene
rgy(GeV
)
Stopping in the Calorimeter (∼ 1.2%)
Going through the STT (∼ 10%)
24/03/18 16
Truekineticenergy(GeV)Truekineticenergy(GeV)
Recokineticene
rgy(GeV
)
All together (∼ 85%)
24/03/18 17
kineticenergy(GeV)Truekineticenergy(GeV)
Recokineticene
rgy(GeV
)
Acceptance
• Acceptance=(Stop+Stt)/(ACfiducialvol.)
• Truekineticenergy• Recokineticenergy
24/03/18 18kineticenergy(GeV)
Acceptance
Overall resolution
24/03/18 19
σE/E∼5.5%
Truekineticenergy/Recokineticenergy
… as a consequence
• Westronglydisagreewiththerecommendation• WeproposetocontinuethestudyoftheKLOEoption,untilproveninsufficientforthephysicsrequirementsofaHybridNearDetector
24/03/18 20
Tothisextent,quotingAlfons:
24/03/18 21
weintendtoprogressinthestudyofKLOE+STTintroducing:• athin(≤1X0)LArtargetinsidethemagneticvolume• thedigitizationofenergyandtimeresponseofthecalorimeter• morerefinedreconstructionalgorithms• …….
ν
LAr
CCeventsintheKLOEvolume,muons
Electrons: momentum resolution
24
GaussianFit:Mean ≅3.8%Sigma ≅ 5%
p:totalmomentum GENIE+Edep-Sim
𝜂= 𝑤𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑠/𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑠 =0.18 %
Electrons: angular resolution
25
GaussianFitonθ:Mean ≅0mradSigma ≅0.8mrad
dip-angle
GENIE+Edep-Sim
π0Invariantmass
Δx<20cmandΔφ<5deg. Δx<30cmandΔφ<10deg.
Resolution stays to about 15% but we have a low energy tailThe tail is due to either ü collinear gamma with a isolated hit from the debris of the photon shower picked up as a
shower or ü gamma in calo with another gamma converted and either e- or e- rangeout
Resolution: 14.5% Resolution: 15.1%
5% below 50 MeV
ε(%)
Comparison with our scintillator normalized to the same active material thickness
)th.(calor.)th.(scint.
ε(scint.)ε(calor.)
⋅
Neutron efficiency
• Stable for different run conditions
• Very high efficiency w.r.t. the naive expectation ( ~ 10% @ 2 MeV thr.)
• Epeak = 180 MeV
THANK YOU