Was this traffic analyzed in the DEIR? Including traffic that skips this intersection and goes into Potrero Hill (e.g., ia !rkansas, Pennsylania" to use other onra#ps?The assessment in the EIR did review this on-ramp intersection and dont project it would be gridlocked to the point of failure. I attach some key figures and tables that show how the ramps look for !outhbound "#$ at %ariposa& were assessed as e'isting conditions and as future condition with a basketball game.This is not meant to be a pro'y for reviewing the documents summaries in more detail( so I also attach this link to help) http)**www.gsweventcenter.com*+raft,!EIR,and,-ppendices*.ol,/,0!1,%2,+!EIR.pdf $an %e restripe this intersection of &ariposa and the '() onra#p to #ake it #ore clear and efficient for driers? -dam and I observed and photographed the way this odd intersection is controlled and striped after the meeting.1e would like to hear more from 2ooster member 1alker 2ass about what he e'plicitly suggests 3 I sent an email to him about follow ups.I dont see why !4%T- couldnt support improvements that would make this work better.$an you proide the operating cost figures for the changes to &uni lines '' and **, and ho% #uch the proposed &uni line ++ %ould ,e? %y colleagues at !4%T- can do that 3 I cc -ean .ennedy of %uni 4orward to elaborate if needed3 but these %uni lines changes along with about 5$ others& were proposed independently from the 1arriors -rena changes. 6ike 7entral !ubway and the 2RT line on /8th !treet( the "" and the 99 changes were already proposed and cleared before the 1arriors :roject( so they are already assu#ed.They dont figure into the agreements we +; have with the 1arriors e.g.( the