results from the 2012 alumni attitude study · csu system alumni attitude study participation •...
TRANSCRIPT
Presented by:
Results from the 2012 Alumni Attitude Study©
Presented by: The slides in this handout are part of a more
complete and comprehensive oral presentation. For an in-depth understanding of the
information provided herein, you should view these slides in combination with that
presentation. For questions contact Rob Shoss at PEG, Ltd.
© PEG, Ltd. 2013
Alumni Attitude Study©
About the Study©
Slide 2
• CSU System Alumni Attitude Study participation
• Prior study conducted with CSU System in 2008
• 18 participants in 2008 and 19 in 2012
• 16K responses in 2008 and 21K responses in 2012
• About the Study
• Cooperative development of the instrument (11 founding institutions)
• Survey completed by over 500,000 alumni at 200 universities and colleges over the last 12 years
• Instrument 85% the same as originally developed
• Instrument was branded to reflect The California State University
About the Alumni Attitude Study©
Slide 3
Participants CSU 2008 Project CSU 2012 Project
Slide 4
Cal Poly Pomona
Cal Poly SLO
CSU, Channel Islands
Chico State
CSU, Dominguez Hills
CSU, East Bay
Fresno State
Cal State Fullerton
Humboldt State University
CSU, Long Beach
CSU, Los Angeles
CSU, Northridge
CSU, Monterey Bay
Sacramento State University
CSU, San Bernardino
San Diego State University
San Jose State University
CSU, San Marcos
CSU, Stanislaus
CSU, Bakersfield
Cal Poly Pomona
Cal Poly SLO
Chico State
CSU, Dominguez Hills
CSU, East Bay
Fresno State
Cal State Fullerton
Humboldt State University
CSU, Long Beach
CSU, Northridge
Sacramento State University
CSU, San Bernardino
San Diego State University
San Jose State University
CSU, San Marcos
Sonoma State University
CSU Stanislaus
* Source: “The Ever-Shifting Internet Population”, The Pew Internet & American Life Project, April 16, 2003.
2012 Participants by group
Slide 5
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3
Dominguez Hills Chico Cal Poly SLO San Bernardino Cal Poly Pomona San Diego
East Bay Fullerton Long Beach Humboldt San Jose Fresno State
Channel Islands Northridge San Marcos Sacramento Los Angeles
Monterey Bay Stanislaus
Slide 6
2,161 2,120 2,000
1,745 1,706 1,630 1,442 1,380
1,082 1,047 1,046
777 773
548 506 347 323
166 87
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Distribution and Response Number of Responses
Distribution and Response
2012 Response Rate
Surveys Presumed Delivered
Number of responses
Slide 7
2.88%
724,597
20,886
2008 Response Rate
Presumed Delivered
Number of responses
10.75%
152,195
16,367
* Source: “The Ever-Shifting Internet Population”, The Pew Internet & American Life Project, April 16, 2003.
Bias is inherent in all research studies. It must be understood and minimized where possible.
Confidence Interval • Computation based on number of responses and variation of responses • Assumes random distribution and ability to respond • Response percentage is not part of the consideration for this calculation Non-Response Bias • A low survey response rate and corresponding high non-response rate causes concern about
differences between respondents and non-respondents • Exists in both internet and phone surveys as well as mail • Consistency of ranking for question groups helps alleviate concern • Distribution across membership status, age, and gender also helps reduce concern
Selection Bias • A survey will be more representative of the entire population if sample selection is truly random
and each member of the population has an equal opportunity to be selected • Possibly more of an internet issue currently for some schools • Approximately 82% of college graduates have access to the internet and email*
Slide 8
Slide 9
11%
3%
9%
7%
5% 5% 4% 4%
4% 3% 3%
2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1%
0% 0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
Distribution and Response Response Rate
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Participants All School Comparables
Slide 10
American University CSU - San Diego National-Louis University University of Arkansas
Auburn University CSU - San Marcos New York University University of Baltimore
Barry University CSU - Stanislaus Oakland University University of Central Florida
Berea College Culver-Stockton College Ohio State University University of Cincinnati
Brandeis University East Carolina University Ohio University University of Florida
Bryant University Emporia State University Plymouth State University University of Kansas
Buffalo State University Florida International University Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute University of Nevada - Las Vegas
Cal Poly Pomona Fresno State University Rochester Institute of Technology University of Northern Iowa
Cal Poly SLO George Mason University Salem State College University of Oregon
Cedarville University Georgia Institute of Technology San Jose State University University of Southern California
Chico State University Grambling State University Santa Clara University School of Law University of Tennessee - Chattanooga
Clemson University Hope College Seton Hall University University of Tennessee - HSC
Cornell University Humboldt State University Sonoma State University University of Tennessee - Knoxville
CSU - Bakersfield Illinois State University Southern Illinois University University of Tennessee - Martin
CSU - Dominguez Hills Ithaca College Southern Methodist University University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire
CSU - East Bay Jacksonville State University Southern Polytechnic State University University of Wisconsin - LaCrosse
CSU - Fullerton John Carroll University Southwest Minnesota State University Virginia Institute of Technology
CSU - Long Beach Lehigh University St John's University Western Michigan University
CSU - Northridge Mercer University Syracuse University Whitworth University
CSU - Sacramento Metro State College of Denver Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Widener University
CSU - San Bernardino Montana State University - Billings University of Alaska - Fairbanks Winthrop University
Era of Graduation
WWII/Post-WWII (graduated before
1964)
• Traditional • Mature/greatest
generation
Yuppie/End of Cold War (graduated
1981–1993)
• Reagan boom to dot-com IPOs
• Good economy and optimistic time
Woodstock/ Vietnam
(graduated 1964–1973)
• Tumultuous ‘60s • Civil Rights Act • Tonkin resolution to Nixon
resignation • Good economy
Electronic Revolution/
Dot-Com (graduated 1994–
2000)
• Dot-com IPOs to 9/11 • Peace and fall of Berlin Wall • Big booming economy focused
on youth
Post-Watergate (graduated 1974–1980)
• Nixon resignation to Reagan boom
• Younger brothers and sisters of Woodstock/Vietnam
• Bad economy and pessimistic time
Post-9/11 (graduated 2000 or
after)
• Economic bust • Focus away from youth • War in our time
Population Demographics
Study Results
Slide 12
Response By Degree Obtained
Perc
enta
ge o
f Par
ticip
ants
Slide 13
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Undergraduate Graduate Both undergraduateand graduate
No degree obtained
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Response By Location of Current Residence
Perc
enta
ge o
f Par
ticip
ants
Slide 14
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Within 10miles
11-50 miles 51-100 miles 101-250 miles Over 250within the US
Over 250outside the US
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Response By Location of Current Residence
Slide 15
Perc
enta
ge o
f Par
ticip
ants
- 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Residence in-state Residence out-of-state Resident of another country
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Response By Ethnicity
Perc
enta
ge o
f Par
ticip
ants
Slide 16
- 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Caucasian AfricanAmerican
Hispanic Asian orPacific
Islander
AmericanIndian orAlaskan
Other Prefer not toanswer
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Response By Age
Perc
enta
ge o
f Par
ticip
ants
Slide 17
- 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Less than 25 26 to 30 31 to 44 45 to 62 63 and older
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Response By Era
Slide 18
Perc
enta
ge o
f Par
ticip
ants
05
101520253035404550
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\Vietnam Post Watergate Yuppie\End of Cold War ElectronicRevolution\Dot-Com
Post 9/11
All Schools 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Response Post 911 Percentage By University
Slide 19
Perc
enta
ge o
f Par
ticip
ants
30 44
99 89
82 75
62 58 51 50 46 46 45 45 42 40 39 33 31 27 25
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Response By Gender
Slide 20
Perc
enta
ge o
f Par
ticip
ants
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
Male Female
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Response By Gender Across Generations
Slide 21
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Male Female
WWII Boomers Gen X Gen Y
Perc
enta
ge o
f Par
ticip
ants
- 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Never-do not planto in future
Have-do not planto in future
Never-plan to infuture
Currently-plan tocontinue
Currently-plan toincrease
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Distribution and Response By Q23 Intent to Participate Financially
Non-contributors Contributors Might
contribute in the future
Slide 22
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Never-do not plan toin future
Have-do not plan toin future
Never-plan to infuture
Currently-plan tocontinue
Currently-plan toincrease
Never Occasionally Regularly All the time
Response By Q23 Intent to Participate Financially vs. Q02
Non-contributors Contributors Might contribute in the future
Slide 23
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
46% 31%
How often do you promote the your university to others?
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
Never-do not plan toin future
Have-do not plan toin future
Never-plan to infuture
Currently-plan tocontinue
Currently-plan toincrease
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\Vietnam Post Watergate
Yuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Response By Q23 Intent to Participate Financially vs. Era
Non-contributors Contributors Might contribute in the future
Slide 24
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
Implications: Highlighted Issues & Areas of Focus
• Equity of Degree Matters
• Enhanced opportunities to branding association on campus
• More effective communications
High value talking points
High value communication topics
Segmentation opportunities
• Underlying issues regarding alumni events
Slide 25
Loyalty
Study Results
Slide 26
Q07. How well did the highest degree from the University prepare you for each of the following?
Poor preparation
Fair preparation
Good preparation
Excellent preparation
Slide 27
Current work status
Commitment to continuous learning
Deepening my understanding and commitmentto personal development
Further graduate education
Contributing to my community
Responding to new career opportunities
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Poor preparation
Fair preparation
Good preparation
Excellent preparation
Q07. How well did the highest degree from the University prepare you for each of the following? By Era
Slide 28
Current work status
Commitment to continuous learning
Deepening my understanding andcommitment to personal development
Further graduate education
Contributing to my community
Responding to new careeropportunities
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\ Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Q07. How well did the highest degree from the University prepare you for each of the following? Current Work Status
Poor preparation
Fair preparation
Good preparation
Excellent preparation
Slide 29
Cal Poly SLOChico
Ind. CSUInd. CSUInd. CSU
Dominguez HillsInd. CSUInd. CSUInd. CSUInd. CSUInd. CSUInd. CSU
* Ind. CSU* Ind. CSU
Ind. CSUInd. CSU
* Ind. CSUInd. CSU
* Ind. CSU
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Q01. How would you rate your decision to attend the University?
Slide 30
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Bad decision Fair decision Good decision Great decision
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q01. How would you rate your decision to attend the University? Percentage of respondents who chose top two choices
Slide 31
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
99 95 95 95 95 94 93 93 92 92 91 90 89 89 88 86 86 85 84
-
25
50
75
100Ca
l Pol
y SL
O
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Chic
o
Hum
bold
t
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
* In
d. C
SU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Q04. Which of the following best describes your experience as a student?
Slide 32
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
-
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
Poor Fair Good Excellent
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q04. Which of the following best describes your experience as a student? Percentage of respondents who chose top two choices
Slide 33
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
98 95 94 94 93 93 92 91 91 90 90 89 89 88 87 86 85
-
25
50
75
100Ca
l Pol
y SL
O
Chic
o
Ind.
CSU
Hum
bold
t
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU N/A
N/A
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Q02. How often do you promote the University to others?
Slide 34
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
- 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Never Occasionally Regularly All the time
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q02. How often do you promote the University to others? Percentage of respondents who chose top two choices
Slide 35
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
79
61 60 60 54 53 53 52 52 51 50 49 49 49 47 46 42 39
33
-
25
50
75
100Ca
l Pol
y SL
O
San
Mar
cos
Chic
o
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Q06. Which of the following best describes your overall current opinion of the University?
Slide 36
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
Poor Fair Good Excellent
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q06. Which of the following best describes your overall current opinion of the University? Percentage of respondents who chose top two choices
Slide 37
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
98 94 94 93 91 91 90 90 89 89 88 87 86 84 84 83 82 81
-
25
50
75
100Ca
l Pol
y SL
O
San
Mar
cos
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Cal P
oly
Pom
ona
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
* In
d. C
SU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Q05. Which of the following best describes your experience as an alumnus/a?
Slide 38
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
Poor Fair Good Excellent
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
76 72 72 67 65 64 60 60 59 58 57 57 56 56 55 53 52 51 47
-
25
50
75
100Ca
l Pol
y SL
O
Ind.
CSU
Chan
nel I
sland
s
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Chic
o
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Q05. Which of the following best describes your experience as an alumnus/a? Percentage of respondents who chose top two choices
Slide 39
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Q20. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
Strongly disagree
Generally disagree
Generally agree
Strongly agree
Slide 40
It is important to me that the CSU has aneffective lobby effort in support of higher
education issues such as state funding and accessfor students
It is important to me that my degree is from oneof the 23 campuses of the California State
University system
I feel the CSU keeps me informed about ways Ican support the university and its students
2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q09. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements: By Era
Slide 41
It is important to me that the CSU hasan effective lobby effort in support ofhigher education issues such as state
funding and access for students
It is important to me that my degree isfrom one of the 23 campuses of theCalifornia State University system
I feel the CSU keeps me informedabout ways I can support the
university and its students
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\ Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Strongly disagree
Generally disagree
Generally agree
Strongly agree
Q11. How do you currently rate the California State University system in terms of:
Poor Fair Good Excellent
Slide 42
the quality of education?
Achieving its mission of preparing significantnumbers of educated, responsible people tocontribute to California schools, economy,
culture, and future
Providing opportunity for qualified students toattend
preparing students for the workforce?
2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q11 How do you currently rate the California State University system in terms of: By Era
Slide 43
The quality of education
Achieving its mission of preparingsignificant numbers of educated,
responsible people to contribute toCalifornia schools, economy, culture,…
Providing opportunity for qualifiedstudents to attend
Preparing students for the workforce
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\ Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Critically important
Q16. Are you interested in supporting the university through the following types of activities
Slide 44
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Attending alumniactivities and events
Volunteering Advocacy relatedactivities (sharing your
story, speaking to agroup, writing a letter)
Being a donor
2012 CSU System
Q16. Are you interested in supporting the university through the following types of activities By Era
Slide 45
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Attending alumniactivities and events
Volunteering Advocacy relatedactivities (sharing your
story, speaking to agroup, writing a letter)
Being a donor
WWII\ Post WWII Woodstock\ Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Communication
Study Results
Slide 46
Q20. Please indicate how much each of the following impacts your overall current opinion of the University: Percentage of respondents who chose top two choices
Slide 47
85
73
73
69
69
66
66
66
62
56
31
- 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Value and respect for degree
Accomplishments of faculty
Accomplishments of students
Campus aesthetics (e.g. buildings, grounds, etc.)
School rankings (e.g. U.S. News & World Report)
Providing scholarships
Accomplishments of alumni
Outreach to community
History and tradition
Media visibility (e.g. newspaper, magazine articles, etc.)
Success of athletic teams
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
No Impact
Significant Impact
Critical Impact
Some Impact
Q20. Please indicate how much each of the following impacts your overall current opinion of the University: By Era
Slide 48
Value and respect for degree
Accomplishments of faculty
Accomplishments of students
Campus aesthetics
School rankings (e.g. U.S. News & World…
Providing scholarships
Accomplishments of alumni
Outreach to community
History and tradition
Media visibility
Success of athletic teams
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Q20. Please indicate how much each of the following impacts your overall current opinion of the University: Percentage of respondents who chose top two choices
Slide 49
98 89 87 87 86 86 86 85 85 84 84 84 84 83 83 82 80 79 78
-
25
50
75
100Ca
l Pol
y SL
O
Cal P
oly
Pom
ona
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Stan
islau
s
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Perc
ent
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
Value and respect for degree
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Academics and classesSkills and training for career
Relationship with facultyExposure to new things
Admissions processLessons about life
Relationship with other studentsStudent employment opportunities
Orientation for new studentsRelationship with admin and staff
Traditions or values learned on campusStudent leadership opportunities
Opportunity to interact with alumniAttending cultural events like films, lectures, etc.
Attending athletic eventsOpportunity to participate in fraternity or sorority
Importance Performance
Q13. How important was each of the following to your experience as a student, and how well did the University do at providing them?
Not Important
Poor
Somewhat Important
Fair
Very Important
Good
Critically Important Excellent
Slide 50
Importance exceeds Performance
Performance exceeds Importance
Q13. How important was each of the following to your experience as a student, and how well did the University do at providing them? Gap Analysis
Slide 51
Academics and classesSkills and training for career
Relationship with facultyExposure to new things
Admissions processLessons about life
Relationship with other studentsStudent employment opportunities
Orientation for new studentsRelationship with admin and staff
Traditions or values learned on campusStudent leadership opportunities
Opportunity to interact with alumniAttending cultural events like films, lectures, etc.
Attending athletic eventsOpportunity to participate in fraternity or sorority
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Importance exceeds Performance
Performance exceeds Importance
Q13. How important was each of the following to your experience as a student, and how well did the University do at providing them? Gap Analysis by Era
Slide 52
Academics and classesSkills and training for career
Relationship with facultyExposure to new things
Admissions processLessons about life
Relationship with other studentsStudent employment opportunities
Orientation for new studentsRelationship with admin and staff
Traditions or values learned on campusStudent leadership opportunities
Opportunity to interact with alumniAttending cultural events like films, lectures, etc.
Attending athletic eventsOpportunity to participate in fraternity or sorority
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Correlation Analysis Highest correlation to “loyalty” across all questions
Slide 53
.00 .05.10.15.20.25.30.35.40.45.50.55
q07c Responding to new career…q07a Current work status
q07b Commitment to continuous…q07f Further graduate education
q07e Deepening my understanding and…c3c Preparing students for the workforce
q07d Contributing to my communityc3b The quality of education
c3d Achieving its mission of preparing…q10op Traditions or values learned on…
q10lp Skills and training for careerq10cp Academics and classes
q08ep Serving as ambassadors or…q10mp Lessons about life
q10np Exposure to new thingsq08ap Mentoring students
Read alumni email
Read alumni magazine
Visit campus
Visit campus web site
Get in touch with other alumni
Use Facebook
Use Linked-in
Attend your university sporting events
Attend local alumni association or club events
Use Twitter
Volunteer to work on campus or at event
Use electronic alumni directory
Attend class reunions
Use printed alumni directory
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q18. In your relationship with the University, please describe how often you do or have done the following.
Never One time A few times Frequently
Slide 54
Read alumni email
Read alumni magazine
Visit campus
Visit campus web site
Get in touch with other alumni
Use Facebook
Use Linked-in
Attend your university sporting events
Attend local alumni association or club…
Use Twitter
Volunteer to work on campus or at…
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\ Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Q18. In your relationship with the University, please describe how often you do or have done the following. By Era
Never One time A few times Frequently
Slide 55
Q19. For each of the communication methods listed below, please tell us how important that method is to you and also rate the University’s effectiveness in utilizing that method.
Not Important
Poor
Somewhat Important
Fair
Very Important
Good
Critically Important Excellent
Slide 56
University web site
Electronic newsletter
The alumni magazine (printed)
Communication regarding your services or benefits
Invitations to University activities
Invitations to alumni activities
Periodic informational communications
Alumni web site
Social media_online community
Reunion mailings
Viral Video_YouTube
Importance Performance
University web site
Electronic newsletter
The alumni magazine (printed)
Communication regarding your services or benefits
Invitations to University activities
Invitations to alumni activities
Periodic informational communications
Alumni web site
Social media_online community
Reunion mailings
Viral Video_YouTube
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q19. For each of the communication methods listed below, please tell us how important that method is to you and also rate the University’s effectiveness in utilizing that method.
Importance exceeds Performance
Performance exceeds Importance
Slide 57
Q19. For each of the communication methods listed below, please tell us how important that method is to you and also rate the University’s effectiveness in utilizing that method. Gap Analysis By Era
Importance exceeds Performance
Performance exceeds Importance
Slide 58
University web site
Electronic newsletter
The alumni magazine (printed)
Communication regarding your services or benefits
Invitations to University activities
Invitations to alumni activities
Periodic informational communications
Alumni web site
Social media_online community
Reunion mailings
Viral Video_YouTube
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Q19. For each of the communication methods listed below, please tell us how important that method is to you and also rate the University’s effectiveness in utilizing that method. Gap Analysis By Era
Importance exceeds Performance
Performance exceeds Importance
Slide 59
University web site
Electronic newsletter
The alumni magazine (printed)
Alumni web site
Communication regarding your services or benefits
Invitations to University activities
Invitations to alumni activities
Periodic informational communications
The alumni magazine (online)
Reunion mailings
Viral videos/YouTube/Online Networking (MySpace, Facebook, etc.)
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
2008 Responses
*Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
*Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
*Ind. CSU
*Ind. CSU
Chico
Fresno State
*Ind. CSU
Ind. CSU
Humboldt
Q19. For each of the communication methods listed below, please tell us how important that method is to you and also rate the University’s effectiveness in utilizing that method.
Importance exceeds Performance
Performance exceeds Importance
Slide 60
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
Communication regarding your services or benefits
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Q24. Please indicate your feeling regarding the frequency of the following.
Slide 61
51
69
70
45
59
- 20 40 60 80 100
Invitations to alumni activities
Printed materials from CSU (magazines, newsletters, etc.)
Email correspondence from CSU (newsletters, newsflashes, etc.)
Information regarding programs such as credit cards,insurance services, long distance services, etc.
Solicitations for donations (annual fund, support forathletics, etc.)
Way too much A little too much About right Would welcome more Not nearly enough
Invitations to alumni activities
Printed materials from CSU (magazines,newsletters, etc.)
Email correspondence from CSU(newsletters, news flashes, etc.)
Information regarding programs such ascredit cards, insurance services, long
distance services, etc.
Solicitations for donations (annual fund,support for athletics, etc.)
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\ Vietnam Post Watergate
Yuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Way too much
About right Would
welcome more
Not nearly enough
A little too much
Q24. Please indicate your feeling regarding the frequency of the following. By Era
Slide 62
Invitations to alumni activities
Printed materials from CSU (magazines,newsletters, etc.)
Email correspondence from CSU(newsletters, news flashes, etc.)
Information regarding programs such ascredit cards, insurance services, long
distance services, etc.
Solicitations for donations (annual fund,support for athletics, etc.)
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Way too much
About right Would
welcome more
Not nearly enough
A little too much
Q24. Please indicate your feeling regarding the frequency of the following. By Era
Slide 63
Current and Future Alumni Programs
Study Results
Slide 64
Identifying job opportunities for graduates
Serving as legislative advocates
Mentoring students
Networking with other alumni
Recruiting students
Providing leadership by serving on boards, etc.
Providing financial support for your CSU University
Volunteering for your CSU University
Attending general alumni and University events
Providing feedback to your CSU University about…
Participating in University online activities (Social…
Attending athletic events
Importance Performance
Q08. How important is it for you and alumni in general to do the following and how well the University does at supporting alumni in doing them?
Not Important
Poor
Somewhat Important
Fair
Very Important
Good
Critically Important Excellent
Slide 65
Importance exceeds Performance
Performance exceeds Importance
Q08. How important is it for you and alumni in general to do the following and how well the University does at supporting alumni in doing them? Gap Analysis
Slide 66
Identifying job opportunities for graduates
Serving as legislative advocates
Mentoring students
Networking with other alumni
Recruiting students
Providing leadership by serving on boards, etc.
Providing financial support for your CSU University
Volunteering for your CSU University
Attending general alumni and University events
Providing feedback to your CSU University about how it is…
Participating in University online activities (Social Media)
Attending athletic events
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Importance exceeds Performance
Performance exceeds Importance
Q08. How important is it for you and alumni in general to do the following and how well the University does at supporting alumni in doing them? Gap Analysis by Era
Slide 67
Identifying job opportunities for graduates
Serving as legislative advocates
Mentoring students
Networking with other alumni
Recruiting students
Providing leadership by serving on boards, etc.
Providing financial support for your CSU University
Volunteering for your CSU University
Attending general alumni and University events
Providing feedback to your CSU University about how it is…
Participating in University online activities (Social Media)
Attending athletic events
WWII\Post WWII Woodstock\Vietnam Post WatergateYuppie\End of Cold War Electronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Q08. How important is it for you and alumni in general to do the following? Percentage of respondents who chose top two choices
Slide 68
84% 84% 82% 81% 80% 80% 80% 80% 78% 78% 78% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 75% 74% 69%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
San
Mar
cos
*Ind
. CSU
*Ind
. CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Cal P
oly
SLO
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Nor
thrid
ge
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
*Ind
. CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Percent
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
Identifying job opportunities for graduates
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Q08. How well does the University support alumni in the following (Performance)? Percentage of respondents who chose top two choices
Slide 69
54% 53% 50% 50% 48% 47% 44% 44% 44% 43% 43% 41% 41% 41% 38% 37% 36% 32%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Cal P
oly
SLO
Dom
ingu
ez H
ills
Chic
o
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
* In
d. C
SU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Ind.
CSU
Percent
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
Identifying job opportunities for graduates
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Q17. How would you most like to be contacted by the University?
Slide 70
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
- 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
100
Email Mail Telephone Direct face to face Not at all
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q16. What are barriers to your participation in alumni activities?
Slide 71
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
All School 2008 CSU System 2012 CSU System
Q16. What are barriers to your participation in alumni activities? By Location of Current Residence
Slide 72
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
In-state Out-of-state Abroad
Q12. In which of the following organizations/activities did you participate as a student?
Slide 73
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%All School
2008 CSU System
2012 CSU System
Q12. In which of the following organizations/activities did you participate as a student? By Era
Slide 74
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
WWII\ Post WWII Woodstock\ VietnamPost Watergate Yuppie\End of Cold WarElectronic Revolution\Dot-Com Post 9/11
Q12. In which of the following organizations/activities did you participate as a student? By Campus
Slide 75
Perc
enta
ge o
f Res
pond
ents
60%
46% 45% 44% 43% 38% 37% 36% 36% 35%
31% 28% 27% 25% 23% 22% 21%
0% 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
= Group 1
= Group 2
= Group 3
Professional or career related organizations
*Individual survey is not yet closed. Results are as of 3/11/13.
Implications
Study Findings
Slide 76
Top level Action Items
• Feedback to the alumni • Programs and communications targeted to the minus-two/plus-three
– Increase brand of Alumni Association and Alumni on campus • Professional and career related programs • Intramurals • Community Service • Honors programs
– Invite young alumni to as many events as reasonable and follow-up after the event with stories about what happened at the event
– Create a sense of “event” for virtual activities including the survey process and follow-up (watch response rate in the next survey to determine if this was successful)
• Increase understanding of the benefits of being an Alumnus/a • Targeted communications focusing on successful outcomes from events • Build campus coalitions around alumni by sharing and discussing data
Slide 77
Foundation Concepts Alumni Partnership Model
©
Show you care – use a high-quality
process
Let them know that you heard what
was said
Take action in a way that demonstrates
you care about their opinion
Solidify and institutionalize by checking back to
see what changed
Initiate the process by asking their
opinion
Alumni feedback is not a one-time event, but rather an ongoing
process of measurement, action, and re-measurement.
Slide 78
Robert Shoss Tel: (713) 527-0078 Fax: (713) 524-4324 [email protected] www.pegltd.com
Contact Information
Slide 79