results from the 2017-18 north carolina water and...

34
www.efc.sog.unc.edu Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and Wastewater Utility Management Survey Webinar August 30, 3018 Carol Rosenfeld Environmental Finance Center at the UNC School of Government Chris Nida North Carolina League of Municipalities

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

www.efc.sog.unc.edu

Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and Wastewater Utility

Management Survey

WebinarAugust 30, 3018

Carol RosenfeldEnvironmental Finance Center at the UNC School of Government

Chris NidaNorth Carolina League of Municipalities

Page 2: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Using the control panel

Audio: please choose between computer audio or phone call

If you do not hear audio right now, please check your speaker volume or enter #[your Audio PIN]# if using phone

Submit questions in the Questions box at any time, and press [Send]

Click to open in separate box and resize

Click to open in Control Panel

Opening the control panelShow your control panel

Toggle between full screen/window screen view

All phones/microphones are muted for the duration of the webinar

Page 3: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Dedicated to enhancing the ability ofgovernments and other organizations toprovide environmental programs and servicesin fair, effective, and financially sustainableways through:

Applied Research Teaching and Outreach

Program Design and Evaluation

How you pay for it matters

Page 4: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities
Page 5: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Poll

Who do we have in attendance?

Page 6: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

OV E R V I E W O F T H E S U R V E Y

Page 7: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

2017-18 Survey and Study Funded by the North Carolina Policy Collaboratory

ObjectiveEnhance North Carolina water and wastewater

utilities’ resiliency to changes that could impair their financial resources and ability to effectively provide

services by evaluating long-term planning at utilities and sharing best practices.

Project Partner Funder

Page 8: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Utilities that undertake more or earlier long-term planning efforts

benefit from more resilient finances and

improved system performance relative to other utilities.

Hypothesis

Page 9: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities
Page 10: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Planning EffortsFinancial plan: a plan to ensure that the performance of the utility fund meets or exceeds identified financial targets and goals.

Asset management plan: a long-range plan identifying how the existing assets will be managed, and when they will be replaced or rehabilitated.

Capital improvement plan: a plan that identifies capital projects to be completed in the next few years.

Disaster / emergency / resiliency plan: identification of risks and vulnerabilities to the utility's functions, and a course of action to mitigate the risks.

Long-range water resources plan: an assessment of water supply needs and/or wastewater demands long in the future (more than 10 years) and the ability of the utility to meet those needs.

Page 11: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Survey Distribution

• Electronic (Qualtrics)• Distributed to 511 drinking water and

wastewater utilities in North Carolina • Input from State and local officials• Pre-tested the survey• Offered incentives• 3+ month collection period

Page 12: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

https://efc.sog.unc.edu/resource/results-2017-2018-north-carolina-water-and-wastewater-utility-management-survey, under “Resources”

Page 13: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Poll

Who has taken a look at the results report?

Page 14: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Response Rate by Type

Out of 511 utilities invited to participate in the survey, 227 (44%) participated.

Response rate was highest for municipal utilities.

Page 15: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Response Rate by Size

Utilities of all sizes participated in the survey.Response rate was higher for larger utilities, but was significant

even for small utilities.

Page 16: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Primary Respondents

Over one-third of primary survey respondents are the manager of their utility (n = 215).

Page 17: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

R E S U L T S : F O C U S O N P L A N N I N G E F F O R T S

Page 18: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Which Colour to Look At?

Blue• Strengths• Glass half-full• Opportunities to learn

from/mentorship• Best management

practices

Orange• Challenges• Glass half-empty• Opportunities to

improve• Focused assistance

Page 19: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Financial Planning

Over 62 percent of utilities set specific financial targets and goals. Most have the targets and goals approved by the governing body (n = 216).

Page 20: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Financial Self-Assessment

The great majority of utilities monitor their finances against the budget at least monthly.

Page 21: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Asset Management

Eighty-seven percent of utilities have or are currently developing an inventory of their key assets (such as pipes and pumps) (n = 215).

Location is the most likely to be tracked, followed by asset age, operations and maintenance plan, and maintenance history.

Page 22: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Capital Planning

The majority of utilities (53%) comfortably cover more than half of their planned capital improvements and unplanned/emergency

capital improvements during the year. 51% of responding utilities have a fund designated for capital reserves (n = 195).

Page 23: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Capital Planning

Most (81%) responding utilities have a list of potential future capital projects (n = 208).

Most of these are published in official documents such as Capital Improvement Plans.

Page 24: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Disaster / Emergency / Resiliency Planning

72% of utilities have or are currently developing documentation of at least one type of system vulnerability. System vulnerabilities utilities have documented include natural disasters (62%), drought / water shortage

(48%), and man-made disasters (29%).

Page 25: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Long Range Water and Wastewater Resources Planning

Approximately half of all utilities engage in long-term supply or demand forecasting (n = 205). Demand and supply forecasts go out 10 to

20 years for half of all utilities.

Page 26: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Quantity (years) of Planning

Utilities began 3 types of plans 15 to 20 years ago, while they began the 2 other types of plans in the past 5 to 10 years.

Page 27: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Frequency of Planning

Utilities are most likely to update plans of all types every year.

Page 28: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Integration With Other Local Plans

Utilities sometimes play a role in the broader (non-utility) planning efforts of the local governments served by the utility (n = 173).

Page 29: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Poll

Anything that surprised you today?

Page 30: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Reviewing Rates

Of utilities who reported a need to raise rates, 66% approved a rate increase greater than or equal to the amount recommended in the

rates review (n = 152).

Page 31: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Current Revenues

Nearly half of utilities anticipate generating enough revenue for some capital needs (n = 192).

Page 32: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Poll

Would you like to sign up to receive EFC blog post content?

Page 33: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

www.efc.sog.unc.edu

Environmental Finance Center at the University of North CarolinaSchool of Government, Knapp-Sanders BuildingCB #3330Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330USA

Q & ACarol [email protected]

Chris [email protected]

Page 34: Results from the 2017-18 North Carolina Water and ...efc.sog.unc.edu/sites/default/files/2018/PPT-2017-2018 North Carolina Water and...: identification of risks and vulnerabilities

Next Webinar:Setting Financial Targets For Water

Utilities – Beyond the Budget

A brief overview of setting financial targets (e.g. minimum reserve levels, specific debt service coverage ratios, etc.) and measuring utility’s financial performance against those metrics. Speakers from North Carolina utilities with outstanding financial performance will discuss their utilities' targets, how they measure performance, and how they make decisions as a result of adopting this practice.

Date: mid- September.

Stay tuned for details at https://efc.sog.unc.edu/event/setting-financial-targets-water-utilities-beyond-budget