results - indian etd repository @ inflibnet: home
TRANSCRIPT
RESULTS
Exposure of Cynopterus sphinx to the selected stressors have
induced physiological responses as evidenced by changes in the
parameters investigated.
Glycogen levels in the various tissues of C. sphznx exposed to
heat stress and light stress are given in the Tables 1 & 2 and Figs. 1, 2,
& 3. The data revealed no significant change in the levels of glycogen
in the two muscles (pectoralis major and biceps) during the heat and
light stress periods. However, in liver, there was a significant depletion
from the 3O& day onwards of exposure to heat stress. No prominent change
was discernible in the glycogen concentration during light stress.
Similar pattern of change was found in the total lipid content
of the tissues subjected to heat and light stress (Tables 3 & 4 and Figs.
4, 5 & 6). No marked change occurred in the total lipid levels in the two
muscles, pectorals major and biceps, during both heat and light stress
periods. However, the total lipid content of the liver depleted
significantly from the 1 5Lh day onwards during heat stress, whereas light
stress did not impart a prominent change.
The blood glucose levels showed interesting variations during
stress periods (Tables 5 & 6 and Fig.7). There was an initial shoot up in
the blood glucose level during both the heat stress and light stress conditions
and the elevated level is maintained upto the 1 51h day. Thereafter, it exhibited
a downward trend reaching to a highly significant low level by the 60th
day of heat exposure, whereas during light stress no prominent decrease
in glucose level was observed with respect to the control animals.
Ascorbic acid content in the liver and kidney of the heat stressed
bats decreased significantly from the 10"' day and 15'" day of exposure
respectively, showing highly significant decreased levels (Table 7 and
Fig 8). But under light stress significant reduction was noted only in
liver and that too from the 45& day onwards, while in kidney no marked
variation occurred (Table 8 and Figs. 98~10).
Alkaline phosphatase activity in biceps muscles and liver of
heat and light stressed animals are given in the Tables 9 & 10 and Figs.
11 & 12. In liver, during heat stress, the enzyme activity was accelerated
signficantly from the 1 0"' day. On the other hand, the alkaline phosphatase
activity was not altered during heat stress period in the biceps. In light
stress, significant enhancement in the alkaline phosphatase activity was
noted only from the 45* day onwards in liver, whereas no significant
alteration of the enzyme activity was observed i n the muscle (biceps)
(Fig. 13).
Acid phosphatase activity during heat and light stress in
biceps muscles and liver of C. sphinx are presented in the Tables
11 & 12 and Figs. 14 & 15. During heat stress the hepatic acid phosphatase
activity was significantly increased from the 30* day onwards (P<0.01).
However, heat stress could not produce any significant change in the
enzyme activity in biceps. Regarding light stress, no significant alternation
in the activity of the enzyme was observed in either muscle or liver during
the entire stress period (Fig. 16).
Haemoglobin levels of C. sphinx exposed to heat and light stress
are shown in the Tables 13 & 14 and Fig. 17. The study showed that both
heat and light stress induced significant decline in haemoglobin level
from 45th day onwards (P < 0.01).
Data on myoglobin levels in the various muscles during heat
and light stress (Tables 15 & 16 and Figs. IS & 19) revealed that heat
stress could produce a significant increase in the myoglobin level of the
heart ventricle from 30Lh day on wards. Whereas, no marked alteration
was observed in other muscles during the same stress period. But in the
case of light stress no significant variation was noted in any of the
samples (Fig. 20).
The RBC count, WBC count and Packed Cell Volume (PCV)
are shown in the Tables 17 & 18 and Figs 21, 22 & 23. The data show
that during heat stress, RBC count exhibited a significant elevation
between 5& and 15* days of exposure followed by a gradual decrease
reaching a significant low level by the 60&day. In the case of light stressed
animals also a gradual increase in the count with a significant change by
the 1 51h day followed by a gradual decrease was seen.
Regarding WBC count the heat stress could effect a significant
reduction in the count from 1 5& day of exposure onwards. However, during
light stress, though a s~milar pattern of reduction is observed, the change
is significant only by 45& day.
Packed cell volume (PCV) was also elevated in a significant
level between 5* and 1 5& days of exposure followed by a gradual reduction
reaching a significant low level by the 60& day during heat stress. However,
light stress could not effect any marked change in the PCV during the
entire exposure period. Mean Cell Haemoglobin concentration (MCHC)
(Table 19 and Fig. 24) exhibited a significant reduction from the 30Lhday ,
of light exposure while no significant change was observed during heat
stress period.
WBC differential count of the bats subjected to heat and light
stress are presented in the Tables 20 & 21. A significant increase is
observed in neutrophil count from 30th day onwards, whereas the
lymphocyte count was found to be decreased by 151h day during heat
stress. With respect to other leukocytes no significant change was noted.
During light stress also the neutrophil count ~ncreased significantly from
45"' day onwards and the lymphocyte count showed a prominent decrease
during the same period. The eosinophil count also exhibited a significant
decrease from 45"' day of light exposure. However, basophil and monocyte
counts were not altered during the light stress. Fig. 25 shows the comparative
levels of neutrophil, eosinophil and lymphocyte counts of heat and light
stressed C. sphinx.
Relative adrenal and spleen weights of C. sphinx during heat
and light stress are given the Tables 22 & 23 and Fig. 26. Adrenal weight
has been enhanced significantly by the 10" day onwards during heat
stress. Light stress, on the other hand, imparted a significant increase
in the relative adrenal weight from the 1 5"' day of exposure. In the case
of spleen, there observed significant reduction in the relative weights
from 4"' and 10" day of heat and light stress respectively.
Histological responses of the adrenal gland to the two
stressors are indicated by the changes in the shape of cells and increase
in sinusoidal blood spaces (Plate I - Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5) .
Definite changes are noticed in the histology of the testis of
C . sphinx subjected to prolonged heat stress above 45 days (Plates I1 - Figs. 6, 7, 8, 9 and Plate 111 - Figs. 10 & I I). However, the changes are
not so prominent in the case of light stressed bats (Plate 111 - Figs. 12 & 13).
Table 1
Glycogen levels ( mg1100 mg wet tissue ) in the various tissues of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to heat stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE CD = Critical Dilference VR = Variance Ratio
**Si&cance at P<0.01 (one way analysis ofvariance)
Day 5
0.42
f 0.042
0.67
f0.0623
4.51
+ 0.304
Day 10
0.40
f 0.037
0.66
f 0.044
4.31
f 0.290
Tissue
Pectoralis
major
Biceps
Liver
Day 30
0.40
f 0.032
0.60
f 0.068
3.52
f 0.271
Day 15
0.41
f 0.031
0.62
f 0.057
4.21
_+ 0.398
Day 2
0.42
f 0.035
0.67
f 0.052
4.56
f 0.349
Control
0.4 1
t 0.033
0.67
f 0.058
1.65
f 0.354
Day 45
0.39
f 0.037
0.55
f 0.058
3.27
_+ 0.280
Day 3
0.41
f 0.040
0.69
f 0.067
4.51
f 0.386
Day 1
0.43
f 0.031
0.66
f 0.044
4.69
f 0.339
Day 4
0.43
f 0.037
0.68
f 0.061
4.49
f 0.449
Day 60
037
f 0.034
0'51
f 0,062
2'40
f 0.162
CD
010
0.17
0.95
VR
0.24
- 0.96
4.80"
Table 2
Glycogen levels ( mgI100 mg wet tissue ) in the various tissues of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to light sbess
Values are the mean (n = 5) + SE
CD = Critical Difference V R = Variance Ratio
Day 30
0.39
+ 0.045
0.62
+ 0.055
4.16
f 0.405
Day 4
0.41
f 0 022
0.65
f 0.041
4.50
+ 0.408
Day 3
0.43
t 0.044
0.68
+ 0.066
4.51
3z 0.323
Day 45
0.38
+ 0.034
0.58
f 0.059
3.81
f 0.234
Day 2
0.4 1
f 0.027
0.67
f 0.053
4.60
k 0.363
Day 5
0.42
+ 0.037
0.66
t 0.052
4.42
f 0.350
Day I
0.42
f 0.039
0.68
f 0.063
4.58
f 0.430
%sue
Pectoralis major
Biceps
Liver
Day 60
03 '
+ 0.028
O S 2
f 0.047
3'67
f 0.268
Control
0.4 1
C 0.033
0.67
+ 0.058
4.65
f 0.354
Day 10
0.41
f 0.042
0.64
f 0.057
4.38
+ 0.439
Day 15
0.40
f 0.0280
0 65
f 0 041
4.25
f 0.334
CD
0 1 0
0.16
1.03
- VR
0.23
0 78
0.95
Fig .1 Glycogen levels in the various tissues of Cynopte rus sphinz subjected to heat stress
Days
m Pectorolis major A Biceps A Liver
4.0
al
U)
al 3
3.5 . - * + 3.0
m 7.5
E g 2.0 7 '. (r 1 . 5 - E
I
Fig. 2 Glycogen levels in the various tissues of Cynopterus sphinz subjected to light stress
Pectorolis major A Biceps
1
Fig. 3 Glycogen level in the liver of Cynopterus sphinx subjected t o heat stress and light stress
Table 3
Total lipid (mg1100 mg wet tissue) in the various tissues of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to heat stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD =Critical Difference
VR = Vaiance Ratio
**Sigruficance at P<0.01 (one way analysis ofvariance)
VR
0.47
1.57
4.87**
CD
2.05
0.55
1.09
Day 60
7.09 k0.635
1.80
fl.178
3.01
M.254
Tissue
Pectoralis major
Biceps
Liver
Day 30
7.83 9 . 6 3 2
1.93
M I 8 9
3.61
M.261
Day 45
7.40 kO553
1.82
H 153
3.35
M.270
Control
8.47 L0.567
2.30
k0.215
518
k0.365
Day 1
8.39 M.808
2.47
k0.203
5.24
M.411
Day 15
8.20 M.750
2.09
M.170
4.07
M.332
Day2
8.52 M.783
2.41
f 0.162
5.14
33.374
Day3
8.61 M.899
2.26
f 0.221
5.07
M.498
Day 4
8.43 Mi505
2.42
M.199
5.20
M.417
Day 5
8.30 M.814
2.31
M.222
5.04
M.426
Day 10
8.09 M.742
2.15
M.183
4.48
M.480
Table 4
Total lipid (mg1100 mg wet weight) in the various tissues of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to light stress
Values are the mean (n = 5 ) + SE CD = Critical Difference
V R = Variance Ratio
CD
192
191
12.2
Day 60
7 7 7 + O 616
2 0 2 0 7
1 0 2
f O 3 1 6
Tissue
Pectoralis major
Biceps
Liver
VR
0 1 6
0 5 1
1 1 3
Control
8 47 + O 567
2 30
f 0 2 1 5
5 18
f O 3 6 5
Day 45
7 92 + O 709
Day 1
8 64 f 0 5 3 5
235
f O 2 3 3
5 06
t o 3 8 5
Day 2
8 42 k0.641
2 4 8
f . 0221
5 27
f 0 4 4 2
Day 3
8 55 k O 693
2 20
2 0 1 7 1
5 25
f O 5 0 2
Day 30
8 20 + o 540
Day 4
8 51 + O 558
2 44
kO151
5 02
f O 3 7 5
Day 5
8 45 + O 767
2 2 7 1 2 ' 3 fO23G fO16.l
? 39
+O185
5 10
+O449
Day 10
8 39 + o 794
4 52
+O473
Day 15
8 28 f o 804
421
i O 4 7 5
2 32 f O 1 6 4
5 01
k 0 5 1 2
2 28
f O 1 5 5
1 75
2 0 1 1 3
Fig 4 Total lipid in the various tissues of C y n o p t a r u s sphinz subjected to heat stress
10 I Pectoralis major A Biceps A Liver
- - - - 7 -
D a y s
Fig. 5 Total lipid in the various tissues of Cynoptesus sphinz subjected t o light stress
Pectorolis major A Biceps A Liver
Fig. 6 Total lipid levels in the liver of Cynopterus sphinx subjected to heat stress and light stress
Heat stress v Light stress
Table 5
Blood glucose levels (mg/l00ml) of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to heat stress
Values are the mean [n = 5) f SE CD = Critical Ditrerence V R = Variance Ratio **S~gruficance at P<O 01 (one way analysls of vanance)
7
VR
12.90**
CD
27.55
Day45
64.83
f 4.729
Control
84.97
f 6.180
Day60
5369
f 3.689
Day 3
126.87
f 11.172
Day 1
138.04
+ 11.234
Day 4
138.91
f 11.154
Day 2
132.11
f 10.035
Day 5
144.33
f 13.035
Day 10
139.90
f 10.494
Day 15
134.80
f 12.883
Day 30
76.31
+ 5.150
Table 6
Blood glucose levels (mg11 Wml) of Cynopterus sphinx subjected to light stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE CD = Critical Difference VR = Variance Ratio "Significance at P<O.Ol (one way analysis of variance)
VR
9.38**
CD
26.88
Day 60
74.65
f 5.74
Day 30
109.47
f 8.192
Day 45
80.14
T 7,188
Day 3
142.00
i 10,594
Day 2 Control Day I Day 4
129.95
f ll.Odl
84.97
k6.180
14010 134.19
t I033 i 11.846
Day 5
143.81
t 11,827
Day 10
137.31
& 9,256
Day 15
128.19
t 10,762
Fig. 7 Blood glucose levels of Cynopterus sphinz subjected to heat stress and light stress
Heat stress v Light stress
40 ' I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Days
Table 7
Ascorbic acid levels (mg1100gm) in Liver and Kidney of Cynopterus sphinx subjected to heat Stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD = Critical Merence
VR = Variance Ratio
**Significance at P<0.01 (one way analysis of variance)
VR
8 . 6 9 ~ ~
3.79**
Day 60
20.35 + 1.5025
I2'O3 k 0.755
Tissue
Liver
Kidney
CD
5.98
2.71
Day 30
24.87
+ 1.9209
13.02 i 0 . 8 0 3
Day 45
23.22
f 1.5727
11.96 f 0.851
Control
38.03
f 2.0680
17.28
f 0.857
Day 1
37.09
+ 2.7631
17.02
i 1.212
Day 2
36.96
+ 2.2139
16.26
f 1.004
Day 3
35.07
f 2.4640
15.91
f 1.100
Day 4
34.92
_+ 2.2512
14.96 f 0.809
Day 5
34.31
+ 2.4595
15.19
f 1.082
Day 10
31.19
f 1.5575
15.03 k0.815
Day 15
28.95
+ 1.8294
13.98
k 1.033
Fig. 8 Ascorbic acid levels in t h e liver and kidney of Cynopterus sph inx subjectetl t o h e a t s t r e s s
Liver v Kidney
I I I I I I I ! 10 1 ' I 1 1 1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5 0 55 60
Days
Table 8
Ascorbic acid levels (mg1100gm) in Liver and Kidney of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to light stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD = Critical DifTerence
VR = Variance Ratio
*Significance at P<0.05 (one way analysis of variance)
Fig. 9 Ascorbic acid levels in the liver and kidney of C y n o p t e r u s sphinz subjected to light s tress
Liver v Kidney
Fig.10 Ascorbic acid levels in liver and kidney of C y n o p t e r u s s p h i n z subjected to
heat stress and light stress
Days
0 1-iver (hea t s t ress ) K idney (heat s t ress )
v Liver ( l igh t s t r e s s ) r Kidney ( l i gh t s t ress )
Table 9
Alkaline phosphatase activity (mg phenolllhrlgm tissue) in muscle (Biceps) and Liver of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to heat stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) t SE CD = Critical Ditference
VR = Variance Ratio
"Significance at P<0.01 (one way analysis of variance)
Tissue
Muscle (Biceps)
Liver
Day 5
4.82 + 0.259
13 6 3 + 0.835
Control
5.21 t 0.192
12.79
I t 0.407
Day 1
5.06 t 0.210
12.71
Day 10
5.23 + 0.310
15.44 + 0.536 f 0.566
Day 15
4.76 + 0.283
15.51
f 0.492
Day 2
4.98 f 0.346
12.59
Day 30
5.40 + 0.187
16.19
f 0.567 c 0.503
Day 45
4.65 + 0.302
17.14 t 0.956
Day60
4.77 + 0.272
I7.O7
f 0.711
Day3
5.26 f 0.305
13.09
Day4
5.30 f 0.239
12.90 f 0.749
CD
0.77
1.87 + 0.661
VR
0.95
7.79**
Table 10
Alkaline phosphatase activity (mg phenolllhrlgm tissue) in muscle (Biceps)
and Liver of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to light stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD = Critical Difference
VR = Variance Ratio
*Sigmficance at P<0.05 (one way analysis ofvariance)
V'R
0.41
2.07'
-
CD
0.73
2.00
Day 60
5.08 f 0.284
15.22 f 0.667
Day 30
4.76 if. 0.323
14.62
+ 0.731
Tissue Control Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 45
4.98 f 0.181
15.10
+ 0.579
Day 4
5.11 f 0.264
13.40
f 0.656
Muscle (Biceps)
Liver
5.21 f 0.192
12.79 f 0.407
Day 15
- - - - 5.24
f 0.214
14.52
f 0.987
Day 5
4.90 f 0.343
13.31
f 0.510
Day 10
5.03 f 0.255
13.80
f 0.847
5.05 f 0163
12.82
f 0.514
5.32 + 0.320
12.75
f 0.547
5.20 f 0.165
13.12
f 0.968
Fig. 1 1 Alkaline Phosphatese activity in muscle (biceps) and liver of Cynopterus s p h i n z subjected t o heat s tress
v Liver Muscle
20
1 8
W 16 3 in in .-
E + rn 1 2 \ L
r 10
~
T T
fl 14:d'
Fig. 12 Alkaline Phosphatase activity in muscle (biceps) and liver of C y o p t e r u s sphinz subjected to light s tress
Days
2 0
18
0, 1 6 2 V)
(0 .-
E m 12 \ L r
10 r
\ - 0 8 C a,
v Liver Muscle
-
F-f I T
l4;&Y -
-
E 4 --
Fig 13 Alkaline Phosphatase activity in muscle (biceps) and liver of Cynopterus sphinx subjected to
heat s tress and light stress
Days
o Muscle-biceps (heat stress) Liver (heot stress)
v Muscle-biceps ( l ight s t ress) r Liver ( l ight stress)
Table 11
Acid phosphatase activity (mg phenol11 hrlgm tissue) in muscle (Biceps) and Liver of Cynopterussphinxsubjected to heat stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD = Critical Difference
VR = Variance Ratio
**Significance at P<O.OI (cne way analysis of variance)
Day4
3.97 f 0.240
13.91 + 0.852
Day 30
3.96 f 0.206
17.31
t 0.719
T~ssue
Musde (Biceps)
Liver
CD
0.67
2.2
Control
4.09 f 0.206
14.23
k0.536
VR
0.20
5.48**
Day 5
4.05 f 0.219
14.06
f 0.741
Day 45
3.99 f 0176
17.92 k 0.863
Day3
4.22 + 0.189
13.70
f 0.602
D3p I
3.97 + 0.282
13.81
c0.656
Day 60
3.90 f 0.272
18.51
f 1.026
Day 2
4.10 f 0.229
14.04
f 0.928
Day 10
3.82 k 0.222
15.02
k 0.604
Day 15
4.02 + 0.308
1612
f 0.8451
Table 12
Acid phosphatase activity (mg phenolllhrlgm tissue) in muscle (Biceps) and Liver of Cynopterus sphinx subjected to light stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD = Critical Difference VR = Variance Ratio
\rR - 0.30
0.69
CD
0.70
2 36
Tissue
Muscle ( B i c ~ s )
Liver
Day 45
4.21 f 0 187
1512
f 1,0974
Day 60
4 2 4 +_ 0.275
16.08
?r 0.8079
Control
4.09 + 0.206
14.23
f 0.5365
Day 30
4.19 f 0175
14.98
f 0.54%
Day 1
4.25 + 0.221
14 00
i 0.8654
Day 15
4 08 f 0 311
14.57
f 1.0661
Day 2
4 1 8 + 0. 203
13.78
it 0.6733
Day 3
3.97 + 0.270
13.92
f 0.9488
Day 4
4.15 f 0.346
14.13
f0.5733
Day 5
3 91 + 0.212
13.97
+ 1.0322
Day 10
3 8 6 f 0,241
14.43
+ 0.6651
Fig. 14 Acid Phosphatase activity in muscle (biceps) and liver of Cynoptervs sphinz subjected to heat stress
v Liver
Fig. 15 Acid Phosphatase activity in muscle (biceps) and liver of C y n o p t e r u s sphinz subjected to light stress
v Liver Muscle
Fig. 16 Acid Phosphatase acivity in muscle(biceps) and liver of Cynoptetus sphinz subjected to
heat stress and light stress
Days
0 Muscle-b iceps ( h e a t s t ress ) L iver (heat s t ress )
v Musc le -b i ceps ( l i g h t s t ress ) r Liver ( l igh t s t r e s s )
Table 13
Haemoglobin (Hb) levels (gm11Wml) o f Cynopterus sphinx subjected to heat stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE CD = Critical Difference
VR = Variance Ratio
**Sigruficance at PcO.0 1 (one way analysis of variance)
Day 10
12.47
+ 0.341
Day 5
12.25
f 0.559
Control
11.80
f0.431
Day 15
12.62
f 0.403
Day 3
12.26
f 0.472
Day 4
12.02
k 0.401
Day 1
1 1 9 3
f 0.329
Day 30
10.79
f 0.412
Day 2
12.16
f 0.274
Day 45
1001
+ 0.441
Day 60
9.08
f 0.285
CD
1.20
VR
8.22;'
Table 14
Haemoglobin (Hb) levels (gm/IOOml)
of Cynopterus sphinx subjected to light sbess
Values are the mean (11 5) f SE
CD = Critical Difference VR = Variance Ratio
**Sipficance at P<0.01 (one way analysis of variance)
Day 5
12.32 + 0.313
Day 4
12.21 + 0.263
Day 3
12.40 + 0.553
Control
11.80 f 0.431
Day 10
1 1 4 5 + 0.502
Day 1
12.25 + 0.499
Day 15
11.84 + 0.337
Day 2
12.44 + 0.360
Day 30
10.24 f 0.334
Day 45
9 1 8 + 0.414
Day 60
8 71 f 0.325
CD
1.91
- VR
7 02**
Fig. 17 Haemoglobin ( ~ b ) levels of Cynopterus s p h i n z subjected t o h e a t s t r e s s and light s t r e s s
Heat stress v Light stress
Days
Table I S
Myoglobin levels (mglgm wet tissue) in the various muscles of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to heat stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
C D = Critical Difference
V R = Variance Ratio
lissue
Pectoralis major
Biceps
Heart (Ventricle)
*Sigmficance at PC? 05 (one way analysis of variance)
Control
6.67
LO153
4.02
f 01313
712 f 0 320
Day 1
6.78
f0.288
3.89
k0.1958
7.21 + 0.268
Day 2
6.65
f 0 . 1 7 8
3.98
k 0.1898
7.20 + 0.293
Day 3
6.77
k0.217
4.09
f0 .1348
7.03 f 0.306
Day 4
6.61
k0.232
4.11
k O2OlO
7.15 f 0 348
Day 5
6.71
f0 .226
4.16
kO.1605
7.25 f 0.287
Day 10
6.75
f 0 . 2 1 5
4 1 8
k0.1063
7.74 f 0.356
Day 15
6 79
f 0.243
3.90
kO 1615
7.63 f 0.297
Day 30
6.69
k 0.231
4 1 4
kO.1014
8.69 f 0.249
Day 45
6.59
f 0.259
4 03
kO0830
8.60 f 0.265
Day 60
34
f 0 266
3 8 7
+O 1890
857 f 0.305
CD
0.67
0.44
1.43
VR
0.31
0.52
269*
Table 46
Myoglobin levels (rnglgrn wet tissue) in the various muscles of Cynoprerus sphinxsubjected to light stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD = Critical Difference
VR = Variance Ratio
Day 5
6.65 f 0.278
4.03
f 0.135
7.22
f 0.269
Day 3
6.57 f 0.299
4.19
f 0.146
7.17
f 0.294
Tissue
Pectoralis major
Biceps
Heart
(V&cle)
Day 4
6.73 f 0.170
3.92
fO.138
7.06
f 0.366
Day 1
6.63 f 0.208
3.90 f 0.184
7.04
f 0.298
Control
6.67 5 0 183
3.02
f 0.131
7.12
f 0.320
Day 10
6.70 f 0.225
4.10
f 0.310
7.48
it 0.239
Day 2
6.77 f 0.303
3.84
f 0.173
7.14
f 0.325
Day 30
6.70 5 0.220
3.87
f 0.199
7.55
f 0.250
Day 15
6.66 f 0.165
4.18
f0.298
7.60
f 0.277
Day 45
6.50 f 0.201
3.94
f 0.190
7.62 '
f 0.31 1
Day 60
6 4 0 f 0.234
3 7 4
f0.169
7.46 f 0.273
CD
0.66
0.57
0,84
VR
0.22
0.52
o.58
Fig. 18 Myoglobin levels in the various muscles of Cynopterus sphinx subjected t o heat stress
Pectorolis major A Biceps A Heart (ventricle)
Fig. 19 Myoglobin levels in the various muscles of
Cynoptarus sphinz subjected to light stress
Pectora l is m a j o r A Biceps A Heart (ventr ic le)
Fig. 20 Myoglobin levels in the heart muscle (ventricular myocardium) of Cynopterus sphinz
subjected to heat stress and light stress
Heat stress v Light stress
Days
Table 17
RBC Count (RBCx104/rnrn'), WBC Count (VVBCxlO-'lmm')
and PCV (YO) of Cynopierus sphinxsubjected to heat stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE CD = Critical Difference VR = Variance Ratio
**Significance at P<0.01 (one way analysis ofvariance)
VR
4.608*
6.22.'
5.28**
Day 60
"01
f 0.512
4 2 3
f 0.282
36.08
f 1.176
CD
2.35
1.12
5.00
Day 30
10.46
f 0.913
5.10
f 0.319
44.71
f 2.038
Paramaer
RBC
WBC
PCV
Day 45
7.39
f 0.758
4.76
f 0.225
39.20
f 1.478
Day 2
9.13
f 0.901
6.87
+ 0.443
43.33
f1 .577
Control
8.66
+ 0.781
6.73
f 0.452
42.47 k1.822
Day 3
10.3
f 0.883
6.93
f 0.335
44.57
f1.912
Day 1
9.02
k0.783
6.95
+ 0.488
43.01
11.802
Day 4
10.87
f 0.882
6.78
f 0.486
45.90
f1.548
Day 5
11 2 3
+ 0.760
6.50
f 0.405
48.30
f1 .837
Day 10
11.39
f 0.832
5.89
f 0.366
48.53
f 2 . 2 3 6
Day 15
11.78
+ 0.936
5.61
f 0.414
50.53
f2.447
Table 18
RBC Count (RBCx104/mm*), WBC Count (WBCx104/mm')
and PCV (%) of Cynopierus sphinxsubjected to light stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD = Critical Difference
V R = Variance Ratio
'Sigificauce at P<O.O5 (oue way analysis ofvariance)
Day 10
10.93
k0.972
6.65
+ 0.443
44.69
+ 1.881
Day 1
10.20
f0.831
6.77
k 0.576
44.29
f 2105
Parameter
RBC
WBC
PCV
Day 2
11.12
f1 .141
7.01
f 0.529
44.80
k 1.826
Control
8.66
f0 .781
6.73
k 0.452
42.47
k 1.822
Day 4
11.10
f 1 1 4 8
6.67
f 0.376
44.50
f 1.963
Day 15
11 9 2
f 1 . 1 8 3
6.41
+ 0.361
44.64
f 1.452
Day 3
10.93
k0.934
7.15
+ 0.525
44.60
f 1.613
Day 5
11.19
f1 .046
6.71
f 0.560
44.79
f 1.518
Day 30
10.70
f 0 . 9 1 5
5.81
f 0.402
43.82
f 1.937
Day 45
8 1 7
k0.745
5.39
f 0.377
43.10
f 1.810
Day 60
7 0 1
kO661
'.05
f 0.309
44.40
f 1.472
CD
2.73
1.30
5,07
VR
2 56'
2.22'
o.19
Fig. 21 RBC count of Cynopterus sphinx subjected to heat stress and light stress
Heat stress v Light stress
4 l I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Days
Fig. 22 WBC count of Cynopterus sph inx subjected to heat stress and light stress
Heat stress v Light stress
Fig. 23 PCV of Cynopterus sphinx
subjected to heat stress and light stress
Heat stress v Light stress
Days
Table 19
Mean cell haemogolobin concentration (MCHC) of Cynopterus sphinx
subjected to stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE CD = Critical Difference VR = Variance Ratio **Significance at P<0.01 (one way analysis of variance)
VR
0,95
4.93**
Stress
Heat stress
Light stress
Control
28.09
1.903
28.09
1.903
Day 2
28.18
1.012
28.02
1.649
Day 60
25.18 0.359
1960
0.879
Day 1
28.02 1.979
27.82
1.369
CD
4,38
3.84
Day 3
27.86
2.259
28.03
1.843
Day 4
26.32 1.376
27.70
0.821
Day 15
25.23 1.525
26.05
0.899
Day 5
25.47 1.269
27.62
1119
Day 30 .
23.70
1.595
23.52
1.074
Day 10
27.08
0.787
26.86
1.385
Day 45
25.76
1.833
21.43
1.368
Fig. 24 Mean Cell Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) of Cynopterus sphinz subjected to heat stress
and light stress
Heat stress v Light stress
Days
Table 20
WBC differential count of Cynopterussphinx subjected to heat stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD = Critical Difference
VR = Variance Ratio **Significance at P<0.01 (one way analysis of variance)
-
VR
9.00**
1.08
1.48
1674**
0.76
WBC
Neutraphil
Basophil
Eosioophil
Lymphocyte
Monocyte
Day 1
42.8
f 1.562
0.8 f 0.374
3.2 f 0.374
50.6 f 1.600
2.6
f 0.678
Control
43.8
f 1.655
0.6 ir0.244
3.4 f 0.509
50.8 f 1.714
1.4
f 0.509
7
Day 60
6 3 6
f 2.712
+ 0.244
2 2 f 0.489
30'2 f0.860
2 4
? 0.678
Day 45
58.2
f 2.853
1.8 f 0,583
2.00 f0 .447
35.00 f 1.414
3.00
f 0.632
Day 2
44.6
ir 1.964
1.4 f0 .600
3.8 f 0.860
48.4 f 1.630
1.8
f 0.374
CD
6.78
1.35
1.67
4.93
1.78
Day 3
45.4
ir 1.805
1 .00 f 0.447
3.6 f 0.400
48.6 f 2158
1.4
f 0.509
Day 4
44.8
ir 2.497
0.6 + 0.244
3.2 f 0.374
49.2 f 2.200
2.2
f 0.489
Day 5
45.6
f 2.249
0.6 f 0.400
3.6 f 0.509
47 8 f 1.655
2.4
f 0.509
Day 10
47.4
f 2.357
1.4 f 0,509
2.6 f 0.748
46 f 1.949
2.6
f 0.678
Day I5
49.8
f 2.746
1.8 f 0,663
2.4 f 0.509
43.4 + 1 326
2.6
f 0.509
Day 30
55.4
it 2.249
1.00 f 0.447
2.00 f 0.707
39.00 f 1.483
2 6
f 0.871
Table 21
WBC differential count of Cynopterussphinx subjected to light s tress
Values are the mean (n = 5) f SE
CD = Critical Difference
VR = Variance Ratio Significance at P<0.05 (one way analysis of variance)
**Significance at P<O.O1 (one way analysis of variance)
WBC
Neutrophil
Basophil
Eosinophil
Lymphocyte
Monocyte
Control
43.8
f 1.655
0.6 f 0.244
3.4
f 0.509
50.8
f1.714
1.4 f 0.509
Day 2
42.4
f 1.630
1.2 f 0.374
3.2
+ 0.663
51.4
t 1 . 9 3 9
1.8 f 0.800
Day I
43.2
f 1.392
1 .OO f 0.316
3.6
+ 0.400
50.2
t1 .240
2.00 f 0.707
Day 3
44.2
f 1.240
0.4 f 0.244
2.8
f 0.447
50.6
f 1 . 2 0 8
2.00 f 0.374
Day 4
43.8
f 1.959
0.8 f 0.374
3.2 f0.374
50.4
22.249
1.8 f 0.663
Day5
44.4
f 1.503
0.4 f 0.244
2.8
f 0.374
50.2
f 1 . 3 1 9
2.2 f 0.374
Day15
44.6
f 1.503
1.2 f 0.200
3 4
f 0.678
48.4
f 1 . 8 8 6
2.4 + 0.509
Day10
44.6
f 1.630
1.2 f 0.489
3.6
f 0.509
48.00
f1 .923
2.6 f 0.678
Day30
48.2
f 1529
0.8 f 0.374
2.6
f0 .509
46.4
f1 .503
2.00 f 0.547
Day60
5 3 2 _+ 2154
O 6 + 0.244
l 6
_+ 0.509
42
+ I 4 6 2
' + 0.583
Day45
51.8
f 2517
0.6 f 0.400
1.2
f 0.583
45.2
f1 .496
1.2 f 0.374
CD
4 %
1.78
0.98
4.94
1.53
VR
5.25"
0 SS
2.39'
273*
0 5 0
Fig. 25 Neutrophil , Lymphocyte and Eosinophil count of Cynopterus sphinz subjected t o h e a t
stress and light s t r e s s
Days
Neutrophi l (heat stress) o Neutrophi l ( l ight stress) r Lymphocyte ( h r o t stress) A Lyrnphocytr ( I ,ht stress)
v Eosinophil (heat stress) Eosinophil ( l iqht s t ress)
Table 22
Relative adrenal and spleen weights (gm1100gm body weight)
of Cynopterus sphinxsubjected to heat stress
Values are the mean (n = 5) i SE
CD = Critical Dierence
VR = Variance Ratio
**Sigruficance at P<0.01 (one way analysis of variance)
Organ
Adrenal glands
Spleen
Control
00235
fOC031*7
0283
&OW352
Day1
00228 kOCC061
0 280
* O m %
\' R
2505**
1062**
Day2
00238
f00r)88
0 278
k O 0 1
b y 4
00239 &OK1357
0 260
&OW33
Day3
00241
k O W 6
0 273
k O W
CD
00322
00146
Day5
0 0246
k003392
0 257
fOC0120
Day 10
00273
k00X)6g
0 249
foal352
Daq 15
00285
k003360
0 242
+OW528
Day30
0 0321
kOQXIS9
0 235
kOUH31
Day45
00318
kOCC068
0 232
k003519
Day60
00327
iOC0103
0233
iOC0321
Table 23
Relative adrenal and spleen weights (gm1100grn body weight) of Cynopterus sphinx subjected to light stress
Values are the mean (n = i I + SE
CD = Critical DiEerence VR = Variauce Ratio **Sigruficance at P<0.01 (one way analysis of variance)
VR -
7 563**
2 90"
CD
00022
0 02
organ
Adrenal glands
Spleen
Contrd
0 0235
f O W
0 283
i 0 0 3 5 2
Day 1
0 0241
+OW55
0 281
f0K653
Day 2
0 0240 f000083
0 277 *OW33
Day 3
0 0239
fOCK67
0 278
+000928
Day60
0 0298
f 0 0 1 0 3
Day 4
00245
k00037)
0 259 248
Day45
0 0284
+OW375
Day 5
0 0242
+00C095
Day 10
00256
f003083
Day 15
0 0262
+OW57
Dav 30
0 0278
f003387
Fig. 26 Relative adrerlal and spleen weights of Cynoptetus sphinz subjected to
heat stress and light stress
D a y s
0 Adrenal glands (heat stress) 0 Spleen (heat stress) v Adrenal glands ( l ight stress) r Spleen (l ight stress)
Table 24
Correlation analysis between heat stress and light stress o f different parameters
Parameters Correlation coefficient
Glycogen in liver
Total lipid in liver
Blood glucose
Ascorbic acid
Alkaline phosphatase
Acid phosphatase
Haemoglobin
Myoglobin
RBC count
WBC count
PCV
Neutrophil count
Lymphocyte count
PLATE I
Fig. 1. Cross section of the adrenal gland of the control C. sphinx showing
G- Zona glomerulosa, F. Zona fasciculata. R- Zona reticularis. M. medulla (X 140)
Fig. 2 Magnified view of zona fasciculata of Fig. 1 (X 400)
Fig. 3. Cross section of adrenal gland of C. sphinx exposed to 60 days of heat stress (X 80)
Fig. 4. Magnified view of the zona fasciculata of Fig. 3 (X 400). Note the change in shape of cells and the enlarged sinusoidal blood space.
Fig. 5. Cross section of zona fasciculata of the adrenal gland of C. sphinx exposed to 60 days light stress (X 260). Note that the changes are of lesser magnitude than that of heat stress.
PLA" '
PLATE II
Fig. 6. Cross section of the testis of control C. sphinx, showing seminiferous tubules (X 60)
Fig. 7. Magnified view of the seminiferous tubules of Fig. 6 (X 220)
Fig. 8. Cross section of the testis of C. sphinx exposed to 45 days of heat stress (X 60). Note the shrinkage and disruption of the seminiferous tubules.
Fig. 9. Magnified view of Fig. 8 (X 220)
PLATE II
PLATE Ill
Fig. 10 Cross section of the testis of C. sphinx exposed to 60 days of heat stress (x 60). Note that the changes are more intense than that
exposed to 45 days of heat stress (Fig. 8)
Fig. 11 Magnified view of Fig. 10 (X 220). Note the disruption of the
spermatogonial cells.
Fig. 12 Cross section of the testis of C. sphinx exposed to 60 days of light stress (X 40). Note that the histological changes are not prominent.
Fig. 13 Magnified view of Fig. 12 (X 220)
PLATE Ill