results of student evaluation of instruction (seoi)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ed531751.pdfspring...

85
Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) Spring 2011 Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research July 29, 2011 2

Upload: others

Post on 07-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction

(SEOI)

Spring 2011

Prepared by: Office of Institutional ResearchJuly 29, 2011

24, 2009

Page 2: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

GB: ToC.doc Prepared 7/29/11

Spring 2011

Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction

Table of Contents

Executive Summary Overview Analysis of SEOI Questions Full-Time/Part-Time Academic Instructors ……………… Tab 1 Full-Time/Part-Time Workforce Instructors ……………... Tab 2 Learning Resources Results………………………………………... Tab 3 Means Reports Academic ………………………………………………………. Tab 4 Workforce ……………………………………………………… Tab 5 Appendices ……………………………………………………………. Tab 6 Instructor and Student Proctor Directions SEOI Survey How to Read the Individual Instructor Report Please assist us by sharing all or parts of this document with colleagues who might find it useful. You may contact Mario Heredia, Director, Research Support Services (713) 718-8627, or Ray Golitko (713) 718-8629, if you have any questions or comments on this material.

Page 3: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Executive Summary Spring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and part-time faculty. Approximately 121,184 surveys were sent out in (5,346) envelopes; 78,310 surveys were returned to the Office of Institutional Research. The return rate for the SEOI packet envelopes was 96%. The response rate for the survey was 65%. The Instructors’ reports were provided to academic, workforce deans and to the respective executive secretaries on May 20, 2011 on a CD. Methods Used: The optical-scan survey instrument was created using ScanTools for Windows, by National Computer Systems. The scanned data were analyzed by OIR using SPSS 18.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students with the questionnaires were student comment sheets, which were later returned in their original hand-written form to the instructors via their respective deans’ offices. Library data were analyzed by subject and location and provided to library chairs for their use.

Page 4: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Overview of SEOI Responses, Spring 2011

In the responses discussed below, respondents who neither agreed nor disagreed, indicated that they were ‘neutral’, ‘had no basis for judgment’ or simply did not respond to the question. In Part I, Evaluation of Instruction:

• The course requirements in the syllabus were clearly stated; 91.5% of students agreed and 1.6% disagreed.

• The textbook used for this course is suitable; 86.8% of respondents agreed while 2.4% disagreed.

• Other instructional materials (tapes, handouts, web sites, etc.) used in this course enhanced my learning of the subject matter; 83.2% of respondents agreed, and 3.4% disagreed.

In Part II, Evaluation of Instructor:

• The instructor asks test questions that deal with material that is covered in the course; 92.2% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.3% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor communicates clearly; 88.4% agreed or strongly agreed, and 4.1% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The assignments were relevant to the course; 92.9% agreed or strongly agreed, and 1.7% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• My grades are an indication of learning; 85.7% agreed or strongly agreed, and 4.0% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor treats students with respect; 93.2% agreed or strongly agreed, and 1.9% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor is available for student consultation; 88.9% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.3% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor grades impartially; 80.1% agreed or strongly agreed, and 8.0% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor gives me timely feedback on graded work; 86.8% agreed or strongly agreed, and 3.7% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

In Part III, Lab Evaluation: In the section below, students who indicated an opinion are calculated in the agreement/disagreement percentages; those who indicated ‘no basis for judgment’ or did not respond were assumed not to be enrolled in laboratory or clinical courses.

• The instructor explains appropriate safety procedures for this laboratory/clinical; 85.9% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.2% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor links the laboratory exercises to lecture; 84.6% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.6% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

In Part IV, Overall Evaluation:

• The instructor encourages me to become actively engaged in the learning process; 88.7% agreed or strongly agreed and 3.0% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• I would recommend this instructor to other students; 85.7% agreed or strongly agreed, and 5.3% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

Page 5: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q1&2.xls Prepared:7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

91.8

6.7 1.5

91.3

7.2 1.50.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Yes (n=58216) Neutral (n=4451) No (n=958)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 63,625)

Question 1: The Course Requirements in the Syllabus Were Clearly Stated

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

86.7

10.7 2.5

86.8

10.9 2.30.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=53230) Neutral (n=6660) No (n=1455)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 61,345 )

Question 2: The Textbook Used For This Course is Suitable

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 6: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q3.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

83.7

13.23.1

82.3

14.13.6

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=49914) Neutral (n=8333) No (n=2075)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 60,322 )

Question 3: Other Instructional Materials (Tapes, Handouts, Web Sites, etc.) Used in This Course Enhanced My Learning of the Subject Matter

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 7: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q4&5.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

66.2

26.2

5.4 1.5 0.8

66.3

26.0

5.5 1.5 0.80.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=42577)

Agree (n=16745)

Neutral (n=3508)

Disagree (n=947)

Strongly Disagree (n=519)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 64,296 )

Question 4: The Instructor Asks Test Questions That Deal With Material That is Covered in the Course

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

64.6

24.3

7.1 2.7 1.3

64.2

23.7

7.9 2.8 1.50.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=41665)

Agree (n=15483)

Neutral (n=4956)

Disagree (n=1784)

Strongly Disagree (n=912)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 64,800 )

Question 5: The Instructor Communicates Clearly

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 8: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q6&7.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

66.9

25.8

5.6 1.0 0.7

66.7

26.0

5.6 1.0 0.70.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=43078)

Agree (n=16728)

Neutral (n=3631)

Disagree (n=641)

Strongly Disagree (n=437)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 64,515 )

Question 6: The Assignments Were Relevant to the Course

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

57.3

27.9 10.6

3.0 1.2

58.3

27.3 10.42.7 1.3

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=37264)

Agree (n=17677)

Neutral (n=6717)

Disagree (n=1822)

Strongly Disagree (n=804)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 64,284 )

Question 7: My Grades Are an Indication of My Learning

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 9: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q8&9.xls Prepared:7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

63.3

25.6

8.7 1.6 0.8

63.9

24.5

9.3 1.5 0.80.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=40040)

Agree (n=15647)

Neutral (n=5715)

Disagree (n=944)

Strongly Disagree (n=516)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 62,862)

Question 9: The Instructor is Available For Student Consultation

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

70.4

22.2

5.3 1.2 0.9

72.4

21.0

4.8 1.0 0.80.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=46321)

Agree (n=13806)

Neutral (n=3221)

Disagree (n=703)

Strongly Disagree (n=524)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 64,575)

Question 8: The Instructor Treats Students With Respect

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 10: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q10&11.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

60.4

26.19.5

2.7 1.3

60.8

25.79.8

2.4 1.30.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=38595)

Agree (n=16447)

Neutral (n=6158)

Disagree (n=1599)

Strongly Disagree (n=804)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total=63,603)

Question 11: The Instructor Gives Me Timely Feedback on Graded Work

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

56.5

23.5 12.15.0 2.9

56.1

23.1 12.45.1 3.3

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=34821)

Agree (n=14409)

Neutral (n=7637)

Disagree (n=3130)

Strongly Disagree (n=1954)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 61,951)

Question 10: The Instructor Grades Impartially

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 11: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q12&13.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 3: Lab Evaluation

59.4

24.9 13.2

1.7 0.8

58.9

26.0 12.7

1.7 0.80.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=17988)

Agree (n=7802) Neutral (n=3919)

Disagree (n=512)

Strongly Disagree (n=236)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 30,457)

Question 12: The Instructor Explains Appropriate Safety Procedures For This Laboratory/Clinical

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

58.2

25.2 13.9

1.9 0.9

57.9

25.4 13.92.0 0.9

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=17436)

Agree (n=7619)

Neutral (n=4171)

Disagree (n=580)

Strongly Disagree (n=274)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 30,080)

Question 13: The Instructor Links the Laboratory Exercises to Lecture

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 12: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad.xls, Acad_FTPT_Q14&15.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 4: Overall Evaluation

62.8

25.3 8.7

2.1 1.1

63.0

25.4 8.52.0 1.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=40461)

Agree (n=16297)Neutral (n=5538) Disagree (n=1319)

Strongly Disagree (n=699)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 64,314)

Question 14: The Instructor Encourages Me to Become Actively Engaged in the Learning Process

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

63.6

21.7 9.22.8 2.7

64.1

21.0 9.42.9 2.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=40835)

Agree (n=13584)

Neutral (n=5950)

Disagree (n=1825)

Strongly Disagree (n=1709)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 63,903)

Question 15: I Would Recommend This Instructor to Other Students

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 13: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q1&2.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

90.6

7.0 2.3

92.7

6.0 1.30.0

20.040.060.080.0

100.0120.0

Yes (n=13469) Neutral (n=952) No (n=265)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,686)

Question 1: The Course Requirements in the Syllabus Were Clearly Stated

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

86.8

10.6

2.6

87.1

10.3

2.60.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=11991) Neutral (n=1443) No (n=356)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 13,790)

Question 2: The Textbook Used For This Course is Suitable

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 14: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q3.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

84.6

12.3

3.2

85.4

11.6

2.90.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=11840) Neutral (n=1661) No (n=425)

Perc

enta

ge

Reponses (Total = 13,926)

Question 3: Other Instructional Materials (Tapes, Handouts, Web Sites, etc.) Used in This Course Enhanced My Learning of the Subject Matter

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 15: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q4&5.xls Prepared:7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

63.8

26.9

6.1 2.2 1.0

67.4

25.9

4.9 1.1 0.70.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=9549)

Agree (n=3834)

Neutral (n=789)

Disagree (n=236)

Strongly Disagree (n=122)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,530)

Question 4: The Instructor Asks Test Questions That Deal With Material That is Covered in the Course

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

63.5

24.7 7.42.9 1.6

65.5

24.7 6.22.7 0.9

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree

(n=9652)

Agree (n=3690)

Neutral (n=1011)

Disagree (n=416)

Strongly Disagree (n=187)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,956)

Question 5: The Instructor Communicates Clearly

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 16: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q6&7.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

66.4

26.1

5.5 1.4 0.7

69.4

25.2

4.0 0.8 0.50.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=10088)

Agree (n=3802)

Neutral (n=700)

Disagree (n=162)

Strongly Disagree (n=89)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,841 )

Question 6: The Assignments Were Relevant to the Course

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

56.8

27.910.7

3.2 1.4

61.3

27.58.3

2.0 0.90.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=8687)

Agree (n=4070)

Neutral (n=1382)

Disagree (n=376)

Strongly Disagree (n=171)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,686)

Question 7: My Grades Are an Indication of My Learning

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 17: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q8&9.xls Prepared:7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

64.4

24.9

8.0 1.6 1.0

66.8

24.6

6.7 1.2 0.70.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=9587)

Agree (n=3611) Neutral (n=1074)

Disagree (n=206)

Strongly Disagree (n=123)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,601

Question 9: The Instructor is Available For Student Consultation

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

69.9

22.95.2 1.2 0.8

73.3

20.9

4.2 1.0 0.60.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=10706)

Agree (n=3266)

Neutral (n=693)

Disagree (n=159)

Strongly Disagree (n=107)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,931 )

Question 8: The Instructor Treats Students With Respect

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 18: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q10&11.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

61.0

25.9

9.42.5 1.3

63.3

26.0

7.71.9 1.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=9050)

Agree (n=3775) Neutral (n=1240)

Disagree (n=314)

Strongly Disagree (n=170)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,549 )

Question 11: The Instructor Gives Me Timely Feedback on Graded Work

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

58.2

23.7 10.94.1 3.1

60.6

23.2 9.24.0 3.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=8467)

Agree (n=3338)

Neutral (n=1423)

Disagree (n=579)

Strongly Disagree (n=439)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,246 )

Question 10: The Instructor Grades Impartially

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 19: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q12&13.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 3: Lab Evaluation

65.0

24.1 9.3

1.0 0.6

65.6

24.2 8.7

1.0 0.40.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=6393)

Agree (n=2364)

Neutral (n=880)

Disagree (n=98)

Strongly Disagree (n=49)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 9,784)

Question 12: The Instructor Explains Appropriate Safety Procedures For This Laboratory/Clinical

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

63.0

24.8 9.91.6 0.7

64.4

24.9 8.91.3 0.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=6228)

Agree (n=2432)

Neutral (n=917)

Disagree (n=141)

Strongly Disagree (n=60)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 9,778)

Question 13: The Instructor Links the Laboratory Exercises to Lecture

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 20: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

Spring11_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC.xls, WFC_FTPT_Q14&15.xls Prepared: 7/29/11

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Spring 2011Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 4: Overall Evaluation

65.0

25.0

7.4 1.8 0.8

67.7

23.96.5 1.2 0.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=9871)

Agree (n=3627)

Neutral (n=1026)

Disagree (n=219)

Strongly Disagree (n=111)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,854)

Question 14: The Instructor Encourages Me to Become Actively Engaged in the Learning Process

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

65.1

21.9 8.52.2 2.2

67.8

21.0 7.32.1 1.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree (n=9809)

Agree (n=3161)

Neutral (n=1158)

Disagree (n=321)

Strongly Disagree (n=299)

Perc

enta

ge

Responses (Total = 14,748)

Question 15: I Would Recommend This Instructor to Other Students

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Page 21: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

Spring2011_library_means.xls 1 07-29-2011

College campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

DisagreeNo Basis for Judgement Total

Central Distance Ed.-CE Count 1 2 2 5Row % 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 100.0%

South Campus - CE Count 431 238 172 23 19 170 1053Row % 40.9% 22.6% 16.3% 2.2% 1.8% 16.1% 100.0%

Central Count 5451 3087 2139 274 133 3280 14364Row % 37.9% 21.5% 14.9% 1.9% 0.9% 22.8% 100.0%

Automotive Tech. Ctr Count 2 3 1 1 1 8Row % 25.0% 37.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 100.0%

Main Ctr - CE Count 184 68 36 8 1 163 460Row % 40.0% 14.8% 7.8% 1.7% 0.2% 35.4% 100.0%

Coleman Count 4 2 6 11 23Row % 17.4% 8.7% 26.1% 47.8% 100.0%

HS-Off Campus Count 317 180 103 12 6 133 751Row % 42.2% 24.0% 13.7% 1.6% 0.8% 17.7% 100.0%

Health Sci Ctr Count 831 530 614 109 52 1020 3156Row % 26.3% 16.8% 19.5% 3.5% 1.6% 32.3% 100.0%

SE College Opt Count 73 36 43 1 9 35 197Row % 37.1% 18.3% 21.8% 0.5% 4.6% 17.8% 100.0%

Northeast NEC-Off Campus Count 22 10 4 2 9 47Row % 46.8% 21.3% 8.5% 4.3% 19.1% 100.0%

Automotive Tech. Ctr Count 217 104 48 11 3 4 387Row % 56.1% 26.9% 12.4% 2.8% 0.8% 1.0% 100.0%

Northline Ctr Count 2135 1092 662 102 46 949 4986Row % 42.8% 21.9% 13.3% 2.0% 0.9% 19.0% 100.0%

Northeast Campus Count 613 289 175 30 9 277 1393Row % 44.0% 20.7% 12.6% 2.2% 0.6% 19.9% 100.0%

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Spring 2011

Page 22: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

Spring2011_library_means.xls 2 07-29-2011

College campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

DisagreeNo Basis for Judgement Total

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Spring 2011

SW College Opt Count 78 24 19 2 3 31 157Row % 49.7% 15.3% 12.1% 1.3% 1.9% 19.7% 100.0%

Pinemont Ctr Count 562 273 182 20 12 237 1286Row % 43.7% 21.2% 14.2% 1.6% 0.9% 18.4% 100.0%

Northwest NW Dual Credit Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Spring Branch Campus Count 3653 2131 1635 196 101 2343 10059Row % 36.3% 21.2% 16.3% 1.9% 1.0% 23.3% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NW Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Katy Campus Count 2120 1201 951 126 60 1519 5977Row % 35.5% 20.1% 15.9% 2.1% 1.0% 25.4% 100.0%

Southeast Distance Ed.-SE Count 7 2 2 1 2 14Row % 50.0% 14.3% 14.3% 7.1% 14.3% 100.0%

Eastside Ctr Count 2421 1559 901 98 47 1065 6091Row % 39.7% 25.6% 14.8% 1.6% 0.8% 17.5% 100.0%

Office City SE Count 111 56 62 8 6 14 257Row % 43.2% 21.8% 24.1% 3.1% 2.3% 5.4% 100.0%

Felix Fraga Campus Count 418 277 196 25 13 217 1146Row % 36.5% 24.2% 17.1% 2.2% 1.1% 18.9% 100.0%

SE Dual Credit Count 5 5 2 12Row % 41.7% 41.7% 16.7% 100.0%

Southwest Gulfton Ctr Count 349 287 103 23 12 111 885Row % 39.4% 32.4% 11.6% 2.6% 1.4% 12.5% 100.0%

Alief Ctr Count 1571 885 679 108 72 606 3921Row % 40.1% 22.6% 17.3% 2.8% 1.8% 15.5% 100.0%

Page 23: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

Spring2011_library_means.xls 3 07-29-2011

College campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

DisagreeNo Basis for Judgement Total

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Spring 2011

Alief Cont. Ed. Count 92 131 73 25 8 31 360Row % 25.6% 36.4% 20.3% 6.9% 2.2% 8.6% 100.0%

Karate Studio Count 7 1 2 7 17Row % 41.2% 5.9% 11.8% 41.2% 100.0%

Stafford Ctr Count 4048 2370 1618 208 82 1901 10227Row % 39.6% 23.2% 15.8% 2.0% 0.8% 18.6% 100.0%

Missouri City Ctr Count 484 237 132 15 4 202 1074Row % 45.1% 22.1% 12.3% 1.4% 0.4% 18.8% 100.0%

West Loop Ctr Count 2684 1605 985 114 44 1567 6999Row % 38.3% 22.9% 14.1% 1.6% 0.6% 22.4% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-SW Count 1 1 2Row % 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Page 24: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

Spring2011_library_means.xls 1 07-29-2011

College campusStrongly

AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Basis for Judgement

Total

Central Distance Ed.-CE Count 1 2 2 5Row % 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 100.0%

South Campus - CE Count 411 238 174 12 15 200 1050Row % 39.1% 22.7% 16.6% 1.1% 1.4% 19.0% 100.0%

Central Count 5209 2873 2194 179 123 3693 14271Row % 36.5% 20.1% 15.4% 1.3% 0.9% 25.9% 100.0%

Automotive Tech. Ctr Count 2 3 1 1 1 8Row % 25.0% 37.5% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5% 100.0%

Main Ctr - CE Count 178 69 41 3 169 460Row % 38.7% 15.0% 8.9% 0.7% 36.7% 100.0%

Coleman Count 4 4 6 9 23Row % 17.4% 17.4% 26.1% 39.1% 100.0%

HS-Off Campus Count 303 174 100 11 2 157 747Row % 40.6% 23.3% 13.4% 1.5% 0.3% 21.0% 100.0%

Health Sci Ctr Count 798 509 613 78 36 1116 3150Row % 25.3% 16.2% 19.5% 2.5% 1.1% 35.4% 100.0%

SE College Opt Count 81 30 41 1 2 43 198Row % 40.9% 15.2% 20.7% 0.5% 1.0% 21.7% 100.0%

Northeast NEC-Off Campus Count 22 9 4 1 11 47Row % 46.8% 19.1% 8.5% 2.1% 23.4% 100.0%

Automotive Tech. Ctr Count 194 107 73 4 1 8 387Row % 50.1% 27.6% 18.9% 1.0% 0.3% 2.1% 100.0%

Northline Ctr Count 2038 1051 689 65 35 1081 4959Row % 41.1% 21.2% 13.9% 1.3% 0.7% 21.8% 100.0%

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Spring 2011

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

Page 25: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

Spring2011_library_means.xls 2 07-29-2011

College campusStrongly

AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Basis for Judgement

Total

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Spring 2011

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

Northeast Campus Count 578 264 200 19 3 321 1385Row % 41.7% 19.1% 14.4% 1.4% 0.2% 23.2% 100.0%

SW College Opt Count 80 22 16 2 2 34 156Row % 51.3% 14.1% 10.3% 1.3% 1.3% 21.8% 100.0%

Pinemont Ctr Count 530 267 183 17 12 273 1282Row % 41.3% 20.8% 14.3% 1.3% 0.9% 21.3% 100.0%

Northwest NW Dual Credit Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Spring Branch Campus Count 3519 1978 1674 141 77 2601 9990Row % 35.2% 19.8% 16.8% 1.4% 0.8% 26.0% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NW Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Katy Campus Count 2030 1114 961 92 57 1693 5947Row % 34.1% 18.7% 16.2% 1.5% 1.0% 28.5% 100.0%

Southeast Distance Ed.-SE Count 8 1 1 1 1 2 14Row % 57.1% 7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 7.1% 14.3% 100.0%

Eastside Ctr Count 2316 1498 943 63 43 1195 6058Row % 38.2% 24.7% 15.6% 1.0% 0.7% 19.7% 100.0%

Office City SE Count 112 55 59 7 12 12 257Row % 43.6% 21.4% 23.0% 2.7% 4.7% 4.7% 100.0%

Felix Fraga Campus Count 387 270 211 15 11 245 1139Row % 34.0% 23.7% 18.5% 1.3% 1.0% 21.5% 100.0%

Page 26: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

Spring2011_library_means.xls 3 07-29-2011

College campusStrongly

AgreeAgree Neutral Disagree

Strongly Disagree

No Basis for Judgement

Total

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Spring 2011

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

SE Dual Credit Count 4 6 2 12Row % 33.3% 50.0% 16.7% 100.0%

Southwest Gulfton Ctr Count 348 273 100 11 11 112 855Row % 40.7% 31.9% 11.7% 1.3% 1.3% 13.1% 100.0%

Alief Ctr Count 1504 877 683 76 61 693 3894Row % 38.6% 22.5% 17.5% 2.0% 1.6% 17.8% 100.0%

Alief Cont. Ed. Count 91 146 70 15 5 32 359Row % 25.3% 40.7% 19.5% 4.2% 1.4% 8.9% 100.0%

Karate Studio Count 7 1 2 7 17Row % 41.2% 5.9% 11.8% 41.2% 100.0%

Stafford Ctr Count 3857 2254 1657 146 74 2171 10159Row % 38.0% 22.2% 16.3% 1.4% 0.7% 21.4% 100.0%

Missouri City Ctr Count 467 218 140 11 5 231 1072Row % 43.6% 20.3% 13.1% 1.0% 0.5% 21.5% 100.0%

West Loop Ctr Count 2513 1518 1006 75 42 1797 6951Row % 36.2% 21.8% 14.5% 1.1% 0.6% 25.9% 100.0%

Missouri City Ctr Count 467 218 140 11 5 231 1072Row % 43.6% 20.3% 13.1% 1.0% 0.5% 21.5% 100.0%

Page 27: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

AGRI Northwest

N 9 5 8 9 9 9 9 9 7 7 8 6 6 9 9 Mean 1.33 1.00 1.25 1.67 1.78 2.00 1.89 1.11 1.43 2.14 2.38 1.50 1.67 1.89 1.78

N 9 5 8 9 9 9 9 9 7 7 8 6 6 9 9 Mean 1.33 1.00 1.25 1.67 1.78 2.00 1.89 1.11 1.43 2.14 2.38 1.50 1.67 1.89 1.78

ANTH Central

N 137 136 129 142 142 141 140 142 132 135 139 36 36 141 141 Mean 1.23 1.20 1.22 1.48 1.54 1.47 1.59 1.34 1.38 1.50 1.54 1.58 1.61 1.48 1.59

Northeast

N 28 24 27 28 28 28 27 28 26 27 28 2 2 28 28 Mean 1.04 1.38 1.07 1.14 1.32 1.25 1.67 1.29 1.27 2.07 1.46 1.50 1.50 1.32 1.14

Northwest

N 53 53 51 53 53 53 53 53 49 49 53 10 9 53 53 Mean 1.08 1.06 1.08 1.34 1.55 1.32 1.83 1.32 1.49 1.61 1.45 1.80 1.78 1.42 1.64

Southeast

N 25 25 23 26 26 26 26 26 25 23 26 6 5 26 26 Mean 1.04 1.08 1.30 1.15 1.23 1.27 1.54 1.19 1.60 2.39 1.46 2.00 2.20 1.62 1.42

Southwest

N 92 80 87 95 95 95 95 95 92 93 93 28 27 93 93 Mean 1.07 1.23 1.13 1.37 1.45 1.33 1.60 1.26 1.38 1.61 1.43 1.43 1.44 1.40 1.40

N 335 318 317 344 344 343 341 344 324 327 339 82 79 341 341 Mean 1.13 1.19 1.16 1.38 1.47 1.37 1.63 1.30 1.40 1.66 1.48 1.59 1.61 1.44 1.50

ARAB Central

N 15 15 15 15 15 14 15 14 15 11 14 7 7 15 15 Mean 1.20 1.00 1.07 1.20 1.60 1.14 1.40 1.00 1.33 1.64 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.13 1.20

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 1 07/29/2011

Page 28: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ARAB Northwest

N 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 10 5 4 10 10 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.40 1.90 1.30 1.50 1.30 1.56 2.30 1.80 1.20 1.50 1.60 1.90

N 24 24 24 25 25 24 25 24 24 21 24 12 11 25 25 Mean 1.13 1.00 1.21 1.28 1.72 1.21 1.44 1.13 1.42 1.95 1.50 1.25 1.36 1.32 1.48

ARTS Central

N 750 598 714 711 770 766 758 763 742 731 751 435 423 762 758 Mean 1.05 1.17 1.12 1.33 1.34 1.30 1.42 1.29 1.37 1.60 1.40 1.33 1.36 1.38 1.41

Northeast

N 362 320 343 360 369 369 364 368 355 343 364 143 140 369 361 Mean 1.10 1.13 1.18 1.47 1.46 1.40 1.65 1.41 1.58 2.02 1.61 1.58 1.66 1.52 1.61

Northwest

N 334 286 320 327 340 341 340 338 330 335 336 94 92 339 339 Mean 1.03 1.08 1.08 1.28 1.34 1.29 1.42 1.21 1.29 1.64 1.41 1.30 1.36 1.37 1.35

Southeast

N 257 218 247 252 261 259 260 261 254 242 260 95 93 257 261 Mean 1.19 1.31 1.25 1.62 1.59 1.59 1.72 1.38 1.61 1.98 1.73 1.83 1.83 1.61 1.71

Southwest

N 686 580 663 667 700 698 697 697 680 660 686 298 288 693 691 Mean 1.07 1.16 1.16 1.40 1.44 1.33 1.49 1.30 1.46 1.65 1.49 1.58 1.58 1.48 1.51

N 2389 2002 2287 2317 2440 2433 2419 2427 2361 2311 2397 1065 1036 2420 2410 Mean 1.08 1.16 1.15 1.40 1.41 1.36 1.51 1.31 1.44 1.72 1.49 1.48 1.50 1.45 1.49

ASTR Central

N 15 14 15 15 15 15 15 14 14 15 14 5 5 15 15 Mean 1.13 1.50 1.13 1.47 1.73 1.53 1.40 1.29 1.71 2.20 2.00 1.60 2.00 2.07 1.80

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 2 07/29/2011

Page 29: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ASTR Northwest

N 41 41 40 41 41 40 40 40 39 37 39 13 13 41 41 Mean 1.15 1.10 1.08 1.68 1.63 1.40 1.48 1.35 1.54 1.59 1.87 1.31 1.46 1.51 1.49

Southeast

N 25 24 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 15 15 24 24 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.04 1.15 1.12 1.15 1.27 1.04 1.08 1.35 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.21 1.08

Southwest

N 25 24 23 25 25 25 25 25 24 24 24 19 21 25 25 Mean 1.04 1.13 1.26 1.44 1.88 1.52 1.68 1.36 1.63 1.83 1.75 1.84 1.71 1.44 1.72

N 106 103 103 107 107 106 106 105 103 102 103 52 54 105 105 Mean 1.08 1.16 1.12 1.47 1.58 1.39 1.46 1.27 1.47 1.68 1.69 1.50 1.54 1.50 1.50

BCIS Central

N 119 117 117 118 118 120 120 119 115 114 114 79 83 119 118 Mean 1.12 1.21 1.26 1.50 1.53 1.42 1.56 1.39 1.52 1.70 1.51 1.61 1.51 1.49 1.63

Northeast

N 31 30 29 32 31 32 32 31 32 28 29 20 20 32 31 Mean 1.06 1.17 1.17 1.28 1.35 1.34 1.34 1.32 1.53 1.57 1.52 1.70 1.55 1.38 1.39

Northwest

N 150 148 150 152 154 153 152 154 149 149 149 83 85 152 151 Mean 1.13 1.14 1.13 1.33 1.58 1.31 1.46 1.32 1.42 1.50 1.48 1.52 1.44 1.47 1.51

Southwest

N 182 179 176 188 188 187 187 188 185 178 181 112 113 187 186 Mean 1.11 1.18 1.10 1.35 1.40 1.32 1.45 1.28 1.40 1.56 1.46 1.44 1.45 1.36 1.44

N 482 474 472 490 491 492 491 492 481 469 473 294 301 490 486 Mean 1.12 1.17 1.15 1.37 1.48 1.34 1.47 1.32 1.44 1.58 1.48 1.52 1.47 1.43 1.50

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 3 07/29/2011

Page 30: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

BIOL Central

N 763 756 722 782 781 769 775 778 751 753 772 654 653 775 769 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.17 1.45 1.66 1.49 1.69 1.36 1.50 1.71 1.53 1.42 1.46 1.58 1.71

Coleman

N 272 270 264 273 272 269 270 268 257 264 270 260 266 271 272 Mean 1.06 1.10 1.15 1.50 1.65 1.37 1.70 1.26 1.51 1.64 1.45 1.48 1.54 1.46 1.53

Northeast

N 817 807 776 838 835 829 834 829 817 795 830 772 775 835 832 Mean 1.07 1.08 1.13 1.34 1.40 1.33 1.46 1.27 1.40 1.69 1.46 1.32 1.38 1.40 1.41

Northwest

N 1125 1101 1075 1145 1146 1129 1130 1139 1091 1104 1125 1038 1039 1142 1135 Mean 1.11 1.15 1.20 1.53 1.74 1.47 1.74 1.43 1.61 1.78 1.68 1.44 1.51 1.60 1.72

Southeast

N 700 689 669 716 716 710 715 711 693 685 710 639 633 714 712 Mean 1.10 1.10 1.20 1.53 1.62 1.45 1.70 1.33 1.54 1.84 1.59 1.46 1.47 1.57 1.68

Southwest

N 1341 1339 1304 1355 1351 1348 1349 1353 1301 1305 1338 1212 1219 1357 1345 Mean 1.16 1.14 1.25 1.67 1.90 1.64 1.97 1.53 1.69 1.94 1.81 1.63 1.69 1.75 1.94

N 5018 4962 4810 5109 5101 5054 5073 5078 4910 4906 5045 4575 4585 5094 5065 Mean 1.11 1.12 1.20 1.52 1.69 1.49 1.74 1.40 1.56 1.80 1.63 1.47 1.52 1.59 1.71

CHEM Central

N 563 549 529 574 572 570 571 572 553 557 566 563 560 573 566 Mean 1.08 1.14 1.24 1.42 1.81 1.47 1.63 1.34 1.54 1.65 1.55 1.37 1.56 1.64 1.67

Northeast

N 83 82 75 85 84 85 84 85 84 77 83 84 84 84 85 Mean 1.02 1.02 1.07 1.31 1.54 1.36 1.67 1.33 1.36 1.90 1.58 1.30 1.38 1.38 1.48

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 4 07/29/2011

Page 31: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CHEM Northwest

N 569 554 546 577 576 572 572 573 550 556 562 551 547 572 572 Mean 1.07 1.12 1.18 1.48 1.73 1.44 1.68 1.39 1.44 1.68 1.53 1.40 1.56 1.61 1.73

Southeast

N 202 201 198 206 206 205 206 204 199 203 205 205 203 204 201 Mean 1.11 1.14 1.31 1.60 1.92 1.48 1.76 1.62 1.70 1.87 1.75 1.41 1.67 1.66 1.81

Southwest

N 752 722 711 764 767 763 765 761 736 730 757 722 718 763 759 Mean 1.10 1.21 1.22 1.48 1.74 1.51 1.83 1.44 1.60 1.78 1.66 1.38 1.49 1.69 1.77

N 2169 2108 2059 2206 2205 2195 2198 2195 2122 2123 2173 2125 2112 2196 2183 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.22 1.47 1.77 1.47 1.72 1.41 1.54 1.73 1.60 1.38 1.54 1.64 1.73

CHIN Central

N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 3 3 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.20 1.33 1.47 1.67 1.40 1.47 1.33 1.60 1.33 1.53 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.40

Southeast

N 9 8 7 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 8 5 5 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.11 1.22 1.33 1.33 1.22 1.13 1.63 1.25 1.40 1.20 1.22 1.78

Southwest

N 25 25 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 23 25 5 2 25 24 Mean 1.16 1.44 1.33 1.40 1.60 1.44 1.40 1.28 1.44 1.74 1.60 1.60 1.50 1.36 1.58

N 49 48 46 49 49 49 49 49 48 46 48 13 10 49 48 Mean 1.08 1.29 1.30 1.37 1.55 1.41 1.41 1.29 1.44 1.59 1.52 1.38 1.30 1.33 1.56

COMM Central

N 70 68 68 69 70 70 69 70 66 66 66 24 26 70 70 Mean 1.14 1.13 1.19 1.43 1.59 1.44 1.75 1.40 1.53 1.88 1.58 1.75 1.69 1.40 1.61

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 5 07/29/2011

Page 32: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

COMM Northwest

N 32 32 30 32 32 32 31 32 31 28 30 15 15 32 32 Mean 1.06 1.00 1.10 1.38 1.84 1.34 1.42 1.38 1.39 1.21 1.50 1.33 1.33 1.31 1.41

Southwest

N 69 69 66 71 71 70 71 71 69 67 69 30 29 71 69 Mean 1.07 1.13 1.11 1.17 1.21 1.21 1.25 1.13 1.28 1.54 1.20 1.57 1.59 1.32 1.23

N 171 169 164 172 173 172 171 173 166 161 165 69 70 173 171 Mean 1.10 1.11 1.14 1.31 1.48 1.33 1.49 1.28 1.40 1.62 1.41 1.58 1.57 1.35 1.42

COSC Central

N 36 35 35 36 36 36 36 36 36 34 36 19 21 36 36 Mean 1.11 1.17 1.09 1.22 1.44 1.17 1.39 1.11 1.31 1.41 1.50 1.47 1.38 1.36 1.22

Northwest

N 57 59 54 60 60 60 60 60 54 58 59 15 18 60 60 Mean 1.11 1.31 1.44 1.68 1.87 1.58 1.78 1.60 1.65 1.76 1.92 1.67 1.67 1.85 1.90

Southwest

N 84 82 79 80 84 84 80 85 81 75 84 39 45 82 82 Mean 1.15 1.09 1.19 1.44 1.61 1.44 1.65 1.26 1.47 1.59 1.83 1.54 1.38 1.62 1.52

N 177 176 168 176 180 180 176 181 171 167 179 73 84 178 178 Mean 1.13 1.18 1.25 1.48 1.66 1.43 1.64 1.34 1.49 1.61 1.79 1.55 1.44 1.65 1.59

CRIJ Central

N 42 40 38 44 44 44 43 44 42 42 43 19 19 42 42 Mean 1.05 1.03 1.16 1.18 1.23 1.23 1.37 1.30 1.40 2.36 1.30 1.37 1.42 1.31 1.29

Northeast

N 88 88 78 89 89 88 88 89 88 86 87 27 25 87 87 Mean 1.00 1.01 1.23 1.13 1.12 1.13 1.25 1.08 1.16 1.99 1.24 1.63 1.64 1.20 1.13

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 6 07/29/2011

Page 33: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CRIJ Northwest

N 66 63 64 70 70 70 68 69 69 66 69 22 20 70 70 Mean 1.03 1.24 1.14 1.23 1.27 1.26 1.28 1.19 1.25 1.26 1.23 1.45 1.50 1.36 1.20

Southeast

N 72 72 69 73 73 72 73 73 71 68 72 26 26 72 71 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.07 1.11 1.17 1.21 1.11 1.14 1.76 1.28 1.35 1.31 1.14 1.14

Southwest

N 121 120 112 121 121 120 119 120 114 111 116 42 39 121 119 Mean 1.04 1.03 1.15 1.35 1.39 1.37 1.68 1.33 1.46 1.68 1.85 1.64 1.69 1.55 1.45

N 389 383 361 397 397 394 391 395 384 373 387 136 129 392 389 Mean 1.02 1.05 1.16 1.21 1.24 1.24 1.39 1.21 1.29 1.77 1.44 1.51 1.53 1.33 1.26

DANC Central

N 176 99 162 178 184 184 184 184 181 172 181 89 87 184 184 Mean 1.06 1.22 1.09 1.25 1.29 1.26 1.35 1.23 1.34 1.63 1.38 1.42 1.47 1.26 1.28

Northwest

N 112 57 104 102 115 113 110 114 111 111 111 46 43 115 113 Mean 1.04 1.25 1.15 1.37 1.25 1.26 1.31 1.20 1.31 1.64 1.46 1.54 1.51 1.23 1.29

N 288 156 266 280 299 297 294 298 292 283 292 135 130 299 297 Mean 1.05 1.23 1.12 1.30 1.28 1.26 1.33 1.22 1.33 1.63 1.41 1.46 1.48 1.25 1.29

DRAM Central

N 69 59 65 64 72 70 67 73 66 66 65 35 34 71 70 Mean 1.22 1.41 1.23 1.56 1.64 1.50 1.63 1.55 1.79 1.71 1.60 1.57 1.59 1.45 1.84

Northeast

N 46 38 45 46 46 46 44 46 46 44 46 17 16 45 46 Mean 1.04 1.24 1.18 1.26 1.37 1.37 1.45 1.37 1.43 1.61 1.48 1.47 1.44 1.58 1.59

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 7 07/29/2011

Page 34: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

DRAM Northwest

N 65 54 56 56 64 65 60 64 63 55 58 27 26 65 65 Mean 1.11 1.20 1.16 1.29 1.25 1.20 1.35 1.27 1.33 1.33 1.40 1.44 1.54 1.26 1.23

Southeast

N 25 25 23 24 25 25 25 25 25 23 25 5 5 25 24 Mean 1.12 1.16 1.26 1.75 1.80 1.56 1.80 1.44 1.56 2.04 1.68 1.80 2.00 1.76 1.71

Southwest

N 98 94 95 100 102 101 100 101 100 98 100 39 35 100 101 Mean 1.07 1.23 1.11 1.31 1.34 1.34 1.42 1.26 1.33 1.69 1.47 1.51 1.49 1.27 1.30

N 303 270 284 290 309 307 296 309 300 286 294 123 116 306 306 Mean 1.11 1.26 1.17 1.39 1.43 1.37 1.49 1.36 1.47 1.64 1.50 1.52 1.54 1.40 1.48

ECON Central

N 187 167 180 189 189 184 185 188 177 183 184 71 73 186 186 Mean 1.19 1.30 1.29 1.75 1.91 1.80 2.31 1.61 1.73 2.14 1.85 1.92 1.90 1.85 2.24

Northeast

N 89 88 81 89 89 87 89 88 85 84 88 27 25 86 87 Mean 1.07 1.17 1.32 1.46 1.70 1.49 1.66 1.67 1.67 1.73 1.59 2.00 2.12 1.45 1.46

Northwest

N 304 301 281 307 307 300 304 304 289 294 305 78 74 305 304 Mean 1.13 1.25 1.37 1.76 1.89 1.69 1.93 1.56 1.66 1.78 1.67 1.79 1.80 1.73 1.94

Southeast

N 113 107 105 115 115 115 115 115 111 108 113 45 44 114 112 Mean 1.19 1.27 1.33 1.59 1.73 1.62 1.77 1.52 1.73 1.89 1.85 1.87 1.82 1.68 1.63

Southwest

N 518 498 481 530 531 526 529 529 509 509 515 171 167 524 516 Mean 1.23 1.38 1.38 1.70 1.76 1.68 1.94 1.61 1.79 1.89 1.82 1.87 1.90 1.75 1.89

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 8 07/29/2011

Page 35: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 1211 1161 1128 1230 1231 1212 1222 1224 1171 1178 1205 392 383 1215 1205 Mean 1.18 1.31 1.35 1.69 1.81 1.68 1.96 1.59 1.74 1.89 1.77 1.87 1.89 1.73 1.90

EDUC Central

N 66 64 65 66 66 66 65 66 65 65 65 32 32 66 65 Mean 1.06 1.03 1.06 1.21 1.27 1.17 1.38 1.30 1.26 1.60 1.29 1.44 1.53 1.29 1.40

Northeast

N 79 78 71 80 80 80 79 79 75 75 79 33 31 79 78 Mean 1.20 1.13 1.21 1.54 1.58 1.46 1.61 1.46 1.57 1.72 1.63 1.61 1.55 1.46 1.59

Northwest

N 73 72 71 73 75 73 74 75 73 73 75 21 21 75 75 Mean 1.08 1.08 1.15 1.30 1.15 1.18 1.36 1.19 1.25 1.56 1.31 1.29 1.29 1.19 1.21

Southeast

N 44 43 42 44 44 44 44 44 44 43 44 20 21 43 43 Mean 1.05 1.02 1.07 1.25 1.23 1.20 1.25 1.23 1.25 1.56 1.27 1.40 1.29 1.28 1.21

Southwest

N 105 105 101 97 106 106 103 106 102 103 104 33 32 105 105 Mean 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.27 1.16 1.21 1.44 1.12 1.18 1.74 1.38 1.33 1.28 1.21 1.13

N 367 362 350 360 371 369 365 370 359 359 367 139 137 368 366 Mean 1.08 1.06 1.11 1.32 1.27 1.25 1.43 1.25 1.30 1.65 1.39 1.42 1.40 1.28 1.30

ENGD Central

N 513 502 483 526 532 529 524 529 524 513 524 339 336 524 518 Mean 1.08 1.09 1.20 1.39 1.37 1.39 1.51 1.32 1.44 1.77 1.45 1.55 1.56 1.38 1.43

Northeast

N 246 239 232 249 248 247 247 246 246 243 242 116 116 249 245 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.30 1.53 1.54 1.47 1.63 1.32 1.46 1.91 1.50 1.71 1.73 1.40 1.60

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 9 07/29/2011

Page 36: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ENGD Northwest

N 255 251 240 261 262 260 259 259 258 251 261 149 142 260 256 Mean 1.13 1.20 1.20 1.48 1.52 1.45 1.60 1.39 1.48 1.66 1.56 1.70 1.68 1.49 1.52

Southeast

N 320 314 308 319 324 323 321 323 317 313 317 197 192 321 322 Mean 1.11 1.14 1.22 1.49 1.48 1.42 1.58 1.41 1.53 1.74 1.51 1.62 1.68 1.49 1.48

Southwest

N 527 515 509 540 543 542 542 538 542 525 533 373 371 541 533 Mean 1.14 1.15 1.24 1.52 1.51 1.48 1.61 1.42 1.57 1.83 1.64 1.68 1.64 1.59 1.61

N 1861 1821 1772 1895 1909 1901 1893 1895 1887 1845 1877 1174 1157 1895 1874 Mean 1.11 1.14 1.23 1.47 1.47 1.44 1.58 1.37 1.50 1.79 1.54 1.64 1.64 1.48 1.52

ENGF Central

N 300 294 288 309 307 306 304 308 301 302 304 231 231 307 305 Mean 1.37 1.33 1.45 1.90 1.93 1.89 1.98 1.82 1.89 2.07 2.02 1.95 2.01 2.02 2.15

Northeast

N 15 15 12 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 9 8 15 15 Mean 1.07 1.20 1.08 1.20 1.13 1.27 1.53 1.20 1.20 1.53 1.20 1.44 1.50 1.13 1.13

Northwest

N 28 25 27 27 29 28 27 29 29 28 29 20 19 29 29 Mean 1.29 1.40 1.48 1.78 1.76 2.11 1.81 1.69 1.59 1.86 1.62 1.80 1.89 1.86 2.31

Southeast

N 35 32 29 35 35 35 35 35 35 33 34 25 25 35 35 Mean 1.23 1.28 1.48 1.66 1.49 1.63 1.80 1.86 1.89 1.64 1.82 1.96 1.96 1.89 1.80

Southwest

N 461 455 439 486 485 486 482 484 479 475 479 229 225 484 477 Mean 1.22 1.25 1.29 1.60 1.64 1.68 1.70 1.62 1.65 1.83 1.74 1.78 1.82 1.68 1.83

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 10 07/29/2011

Page 37: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 839 821 795 872 871 870 863 871 859 853 861 514 508 870 861 Mean 1.28 1.29 1.36 1.71 1.73 1.76 1.80 1.70 1.73 1.90 1.83 1.86 1.91 1.81 1.95

ENGL Central

N 1208 1167 1133 1183 1230 1228 1219 1230 1202 1170 1208 463 453 1228 1220 Mean 1.13 1.15 1.21 1.53 1.51 1.43 1.62 1.40 1.51 1.79 1.66 1.70 1.70 1.50 1.59

Northeast

N 746 728 719 748 765 763 757 762 744 735 755 282 268 759 752 Mean 1.09 1.11 1.16 1.38 1.39 1.31 1.49 1.33 1.41 1.74 1.50 1.60 1.61 1.41 1.43

Northwest

N 1325 1294 1276 1310 1342 1342 1322 1336 1301 1272 1319 397 385 1331 1327 Mean 1.11 1.14 1.18 1.50 1.56 1.47 1.75 1.42 1.56 1.85 1.69 1.69 1.71 1.55 1.69

Southeast

N 577 544 549 570 588 588 582 586 575 558 577 206 201 583 583 Mean 1.11 1.19 1.15 1.52 1.55 1.44 1.59 1.40 1.50 1.98 1.67 1.67 1.66 1.53 1.64

Southwest

N 1997 1907 1909 1941 2034 2032 2008 2028 1990 1916 1999 749 725 2024 2007 Mean 1.11 1.15 1.20 1.53 1.56 1.46 1.71 1.42 1.55 1.89 1.72 1.77 1.74 1.60 1.71

N 5853 5640 5586 5752 5959 5953 5888 5942 5812 5651 5858 2097 2032 5925 5889 Mean 1.11 1.15 1.19 1.50 1.53 1.44 1.66 1.40 1.52 1.85 1.67 1.71 1.70 1.54 1.63

ENGR Central

N 28 27 24 28 27 28 28 27 28 25 28 9 10 28 28 Mean 1.04 1.07 1.29 1.46 1.30 1.32 1.71 1.19 1.43 1.52 1.71 1.44 1.70 1.36 1.43

Northeast

N 33 33 31 33 33 33 32 33 33 32 33 12 12 33 33 Mean 1.06 1.09 1.19 1.45 1.27 1.52 1.56 1.15 1.21 1.31 1.36 1.42 1.42 1.09 1.12

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 11 07/29/2011

Page 38: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ENGR Northwest

N 73 73 68 74 73 74 74 74 67 72 74 23 22 74 72 Mean 1.16 1.18 1.28 1.53 2.26 1.76 1.89 1.46 1.81 1.94 1.86 1.91 1.86 1.84 2.10

Southeast

N 30 31 28 31 31 31 31 31 29 30 31 17 15 31 31 Mean 1.10 1.16 1.14 1.45 1.29 1.45 1.52 1.26 1.34 1.57 1.35 1.53 1.53 1.42 1.39

Southwest

N 96 94 87 97 98 98 98 98 96 93 97 35 32 97 97 Mean 1.05 1.11 1.14 1.38 1.62 1.38 1.64 1.29 1.56 1.58 1.57 1.71 1.66 1.34 1.56

N 260 258 238 263 262 264 263 263 253 252 263 96 91 263 261 Mean 1.09 1.13 1.20 1.45 1.68 1.50 1.70 1.30 1.54 1.64 1.62 1.67 1.66 1.46 1.62

ENVR Central

N 73 73 72 74 74 74 74 74 70 70 73 36 37 74 74 Mean 1.16 1.32 1.22 1.65 1.85 1.66 1.88 1.42 1.57 1.90 1.64 1.61 1.70 1.50 1.65

Northwest

N 67 60 66 67 66 67 67 67 61 61 66 28 27 66 67 Mean 1.19 1.17 1.27 1.64 1.91 1.48 1.69 1.52 1.69 1.69 1.61 1.82 1.89 1.76 1.87

Southeast

N 29 30 29 30 30 30 29 30 30 29 30 7 6 30 29 Mean 1.07 1.30 1.10 1.40 1.33 1.37 1.45 1.27 1.57 1.69 1.43 1.14 1.17 1.47 1.52

Southwest

N 169 159 159 170 168 166 165 167 155 157 162 57 55 169 169 Mean 1.11 1.18 1.26 1.52 1.79 1.43 1.66 1.37 1.57 1.98 1.68 1.74 1.75 1.76 1.80

N 338 322 326 341 338 337 335 338 316 317 331 128 125 339 339 Mean 1.13 1.22 1.24 1.56 1.78 1.49 1.70 1.40 1.59 1.88 1.63 1.69 1.74 1.68 1.76

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 12 07/29/2011

Page 39: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ESOL Central

N 864 867 833 904 904 899 896 900 906 901 890 480 472 890 889 Mean 1.15 1.17 1.29 1.51 1.50 1.56 1.58 1.44 1.50 1.58 1.56 1.87 1.97 1.59 1.65

Northeast

N 307 309 280 330 329 327 322 326 326 317 312 188 193 302 301 Mean 1.14 1.19 1.25 1.33 1.33 1.40 1.45 1.29 1.34 1.43 1.40 1.55 1.62 1.48 1.50

Northwest

N 461 452 452 474 470 465 469 470 471 468 461 419 413 471 469 Mean 1.32 1.31 1.42 1.78 1.76 1.78 1.90 1.69 1.77 1.80 1.85 1.84 1.90 1.82 1.92

Southeast

N 587 584 580 620 620 617 617 616 618 609 608 395 425 611 604 Mean 1.13 1.21 1.17 1.44 1.43 1.53 1.51 1.42 1.43 1.58 1.46 1.52 1.52 1.51 1.54

Southwest

N 2353 2315 2306 2400 2396 2381 2381 2397 2387 2385 2359 857 825 2330 2317 Mean 1.16 1.18 1.24 1.49 1.50 1.53 1.57 1.46 1.49 1.55 1.53 1.62 1.63 1.52 1.59

N 4572 4527 4451 4728 4719 4689 4685 4709 4708 4680 4630 2339 2328 4604 4580 Mean 1.17 1.20 1.26 1.51 1.50 1.55 1.59 1.46 1.50 1.58 1.55 1.69 1.73 1.56 1.62

FREN Central

N 74 74 73 74 74 74 73 74 73 71 74 35 37 73 74 Mean 1.03 1.20 1.12 1.22 1.30 1.16 1.52 1.14 1.44 1.46 1.35 1.54 1.49 1.23 1.27

Northeast

N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 14 4 4 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.07 1.00 1.27 1.13 1.27 1.60 1.20 1.27 1.64 1.64 2.00 2.25 1.40 1.33

Northwest

N 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 18 1 1 18 18 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.22 1.11 1.22 1.17 1.28 1.17 1.11 1.59 1.39 3.00 3.00 1.17 1.22

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 13 07/29/2011

Page 40: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

FREN Southwest

N 50 50 49 51 51 51 51 51 48 48 50 7 8 48 48 Mean 1.02 1.06 1.04 1.18 1.45 1.24 1.35 1.61 1.44 1.65 1.38 1.57 1.75 1.44 1.69

N 157 157 155 158 158 158 157 158 154 150 156 47 50 154 155 Mean 1.02 1.12 1.10 1.20 1.32 1.20 1.45 1.30 1.38 1.55 1.39 1.62 1.62 1.31 1.40

GEOG Central

N 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 13 12 13 13 2 2 13 13 Mean 1.00 1.69 1.54 2.08 1.62 1.85 1.92 1.23 1.67 1.92 1.92 1.50 1.50 1.77 2.08

Northeast

N 11 10 12 14 14 14 14 13 14 13 14 3 3 14 14 Mean 1.00 1.50 1.25 1.71 1.50 1.71 1.93 1.54 1.50 1.62 1.64 2.00 2.33 1.50 1.93

Northwest

N 82 82 81 82 82 82 82 82 82 77 82 18 18 82 81 Mean 1.01 1.07 1.11 1.30 1.26 1.23 1.60 1.17 1.32 1.57 1.34 1.83 1.89 1.39 1.31

Southeast

N 55 55 51 56 56 55 55 56 55 53 55 13 13 54 55 Mean 1.07 1.07 1.24 1.48 1.96 1.47 1.65 1.36 1.58 2.25 1.71 1.62 2.15 1.72 1.75

Southwest

N 57 55 55 57 58 58 57 57 55 53 55 20 20 58 58 Mean 1.07 1.09 1.07 1.28 1.40 1.29 1.47 1.26 1.38 1.68 1.45 1.60 1.70 1.36 1.29

N 218 215 212 222 223 222 220 221 218 209 219 56 56 221 221 Mean 1.04 1.13 1.17 1.41 1.51 1.37 1.62 1.27 1.43 1.79 1.52 1.70 1.89 1.49 1.50

GEOL Central

N 84 83 84 85 85 85 85 85 82 84 85 79 80 85 85 Mean 1.15 1.16 1.12 1.33 1.44 1.35 1.55 1.26 1.37 1.64 1.45 1.46 1.39 1.51 1.45

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 14 07/29/2011

Page 41: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

GEOL Northwest

N 164 146 153 166 166 165 166 166 157 164 165 138 142 164 165 Mean 1.01 1.15 1.04 1.19 1.18 1.20 1.31 1.16 1.27 1.37 1.28 1.22 1.18 1.29 1.17

Southeast

N 36 35 36 36 36 36 36 36 35 36 35 23 23 36 36 Mean 1.00 1.03 1.03 1.25 1.25 1.31 1.33 1.17 1.26 1.56 1.29 1.22 1.39 1.14 1.17

Southwest

N 211 208 202 213 213 211 212 213 208 204 209 187 189 210 209 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.11 1.41 1.59 1.32 1.60 1.35 1.46 1.79 1.59 1.42 1.28 1.52 1.61

N 495 472 475 500 500 497 499 500 482 488 494 427 434 495 495 Mean 1.06 1.12 1.08 1.31 1.40 1.28 1.47 1.26 1.37 1.61 1.44 1.35 1.27 1.41 1.40

GERM Central

N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 4 4 10 10 Mean 1.00 1.40 1.10 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.33 1.30 1.50 1.50 1.10 1.20

N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 4 4 10 10 Mean 1.00 1.40 1.10 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.33 1.30 1.50 1.50 1.10 1.20

GOVT Central

N 715 704 644 729 727 708 720 723 683 695 708 230 225 719 724 Mean 1.13 1.21 1.32 1.67 1.76 1.62 1.88 1.50 1.68 1.87 1.67 1.72 1.79 1.77 1.88

Northeast

N 524 500 488 529 529 525 524 530 511 500 527 167 163 526 518 Mean 1.15 1.18 1.21 1.47 1.54 1.49 1.64 1.52 1.61 1.86 1.62 1.80 1.86 1.53 1.60

Northwest

N 953 940 883 967 964 955 955 963 925 911 951 223 210 958 953 Mean 1.08 1.19 1.24 1.56 1.57 1.52 1.83 1.43 1.52 1.83 1.74 1.78 1.76 1.62 1.74

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 15 07/29/2011

Page 42: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

GOVT Southeast

N 400 397 373 410 409 406 407 405 392 379 398 124 118 407 403 Mean 1.05 1.09 1.14 1.31 1.38 1.32 1.48 1.33 1.47 1.74 1.53 1.62 1.69 1.39 1.39

Southwest

N 1653 1589 1527 1674 1673 1663 1655 1666 1604 1580 1635 495 481 1665 1655 Mean 1.09 1.17 1.23 1.47 1.48 1.44 1.62 1.38 1.53 1.77 1.59 1.74 1.78 1.55 1.58

N 4245 4130 3915 4309 4302 4257 4261 4287 4115 4065 4219 1239 1197 4275 4253 Mean 1.10 1.18 1.24 1.51 1.55 1.48 1.70 1.42 1.56 1.81 1.64 1.74 1.78 1.59 1.65

GUST Central

N 772 763 739 794 792 791 792 784 784 765 776 430 425 777 771 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.25 1.36 1.33 1.40 1.47 1.25 1.40 1.69 1.48 1.59 1.63 1.40 1.39

Northeast

N 543 538 525 548 548 548 542 544 545 526 538 365 363 550 543 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.27 1.46 1.53 1.46 1.68 1.49 1.58 1.83 1.67 1.68 1.71 1.45 1.60

Northwest

N 810 805 770 838 839 838 837 831 826 805 829 397 386 833 829 Mean 1.08 1.09 1.18 1.33 1.34 1.34 1.43 1.28 1.39 1.65 1.49 1.45 1.47 1.33 1.37

Southeast

N 403 390 392 406 407 409 401 409 404 386 402 265 262 407 401 Mean 1.10 1.15 1.23 1.37 1.31 1.40 1.44 1.26 1.42 1.75 1.48 1.58 1.63 1.35 1.35

Southwest

N 1557 1538 1486 1584 1588 1591 1585 1588 1562 1535 1556 1102 1097 1585 1563 Mean 1.10 1.08 1.20 1.41 1.44 1.42 1.56 1.38 1.48 1.75 1.58 1.58 1.58 1.45 1.50

N 4085 4034 3912 4170 4174 4177 4157 4156 4121 4017 4101 2559 2533 4152 4107 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.22 1.38 1.40 1.40 1.52 1.34 1.46 1.73 1.54 1.58 1.60 1.41 1.45

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 16 07/29/2011

Page 43: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

HIST Central

N 921 887 866 945 944 943 936 941 902 898 924 336 317 926 931 Mean 1.12 1.30 1.23 1.45 1.51 1.45 1.60 1.37 1.49 1.73 1.57 1.67 1.70 1.60 1.59

Northeast

N 454 448 431 459 458 459 455 454 442 434 447 120 117 456 453 Mean 1.05 1.12 1.15 1.37 1.45 1.35 1.56 1.26 1.43 1.85 1.49 1.52 1.53 1.51 1.52

Northwest

N 1430 1393 1354 1452 1445 1436 1434 1447 1395 1391 1420 404 382 1435 1429 Mean 1.10 1.30 1.25 1.52 1.49 1.48 1.84 1.39 1.55 1.80 1.68 1.75 1.76 1.59 1.67

Southeast

N 569 562 546 570 572 572 568 567 558 541 552 152 149 567 569 Mean 1.08 1.20 1.17 1.39 1.35 1.34 1.57 1.26 1.41 1.87 1.49 1.70 1.67 1.53 1.49

Southwest

N 1403 1294 1333 1426 1421 1409 1406 1412 1363 1346 1390 439 415 1415 1400 Mean 1.06 1.25 1.17 1.43 1.43 1.40 1.64 1.36 1.49 1.79 1.60 1.66 1.72 1.57 1.62

N 4777 4584 4530 4852 4840 4819 4799 4821 4660 4610 4733 1451 1380 4799 4782 Mean 1.09 1.26 1.20 1.45 1.46 1.42 1.68 1.35 1.49 1.80 1.60 1.68 1.71 1.57 1.60

HUMA Central

N 63 60 60 65 64 64 63 65 63 60 63 17 17 65 64 Mean 1.10 1.08 1.17 1.45 1.45 1.64 1.60 1.48 1.60 1.95 1.78 1.53 1.65 1.52 1.66

Northeast

N 23 22 22 20 23 23 23 22 23 23 23 12 10 23 22 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.45 1.43 1.39 1.35 1.36 1.26 1.87 1.26 1.33 1.20 1.26 1.41

Northwest

N 54 52 51 54 54 54 53 53 54 51 53 20 18 54 52 Mean 1.19 1.27 1.37 1.69 1.87 1.80 1.70 1.68 1.85 2.02 2.08 2.05 2.06 1.81 1.98

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 17 07/29/2011

Page 44: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

HUMA Southeast

N 41 40 40 42 42 42 40 42 42 39 41 13 13 42 42 Mean 1.32 1.28 1.28 1.98 2.31 1.83 2.23 1.74 1.90 2.26 2.24 2.00 1.85 1.74 2.29

Southwest

N 58 49 58 52 59 58 58 58 57 57 55 21 21 59 57 Mean 1.12 1.31 1.14 1.62 1.68 1.66 1.72 1.48 1.65 1.95 1.80 1.90 1.90 1.61 1.63

N 239 223 231 233 242 241 237 240 239 230 235 83 79 243 237 Mean 1.16 1.21 1.22 1.64 1.75 1.69 1.73 1.56 1.69 2.01 1.88 1.80 1.78 1.62 1.81

JAPN Central

N 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 33 34 36 12 13 36 36 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.06 1.17 1.28 1.17 1.28 1.17 1.27 1.50 1.31 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.14

Northwest

N 13 13 12 13 13 13 13 13 11 10 12 4 5 13 13 Mean 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.23 1.15 1.23 1.15 1.23 1.18 1.20 1.17 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.15

N 49 49 48 49 49 49 49 49 44 44 48 16 18 49 49 Mean 1.02 1.08 1.06 1.18 1.24 1.18 1.24 1.18 1.25 1.43 1.27 1.13 1.11 1.10 1.14

KORE Central

N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 9 9 Mean 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.22 1.11 1.44 1.44 1.33 1.44 1.00 1.50 1.17 1.22 1.33

N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 9 9 Mean 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.22 1.11 1.44 1.44 1.33 1.44 1.00 1.50 1.17 1.22 1.33

MATD Central

N 884 870 832 907 897 896 893 894 872 862 888 573 587 895 884 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.31 1.54 1.78 1.51 1.70 1.53 1.72 1.92 1.74 1.81 1.82 1.72 1.83

Northeast

N 892 866 819 901 895 898 892 897 874 837 877 438 450 892 884

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 18 07/29/2011

Page 45: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.07 1.12 1.22 1.32 1.57 1.33 1.60 1.30 1.49 1.86 1.55 1.67 1.64 1.47 1.52

MATD Northwest

N 1323 1293 1238 1342 1338 1338 1335 1331 1308 1269 1322 583 591 1325 1318 Mean 1.07 1.14 1.20 1.34 1.51 1.34 1.59 1.33 1.44 1.67 1.54 1.56 1.57 1.53 1.57

Southeast

N 629 604 610 634 636 636 633 636 622 611 624 309 300 632 626 Mean 1.06 1.16 1.23 1.43 1.57 1.38 1.59 1.41 1.58 1.91 1.66 1.67 1.63 1.56 1.64

Southwest

N 2038 1970 1936 2082 2078 2066 2061 2072 2010 1957 2014 1034 1047 2059 2042 Mean 1.07 1.14 1.19 1.34 1.54 1.33 1.51 1.33 1.52 1.78 1.58 1.59 1.60 1.53 1.58

N 5766 5603 5435 5866 5844 5834 5814 5830 5686 5536 5725 2937 2975 5803 5754 Mean 1.08 1.14 1.22 1.38 1.58 1.37 1.58 1.37 1.53 1.80 1.60 1.65 1.65 1.55 1.61

MATH Central

N 615 611 523 634 631 631 627 631 597 602 620 230 226 625 619 Mean 1.14 1.18 1.42 1.65 2.02 1.60 1.94 1.65 1.87 1.91 1.86 1.97 1.99 1.96 2.12

Northeast

N 469 461 444 476 475 472 470 473 457 448 463 131 124 472 468 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.19 1.30 1.43 1.27 1.44 1.33 1.47 1.75 1.51 1.76 1.75 1.40 1.43

Northwest

N 1265 1238 1140 1271 1270 1258 1265 1267 1205 1226 1241 344 340 1259 1252 Mean 1.09 1.15 1.24 1.45 1.76 1.46 1.72 1.48 1.64 1.76 1.63 1.73 1.74 1.76 1.82

Southeast

N 519 514 480 528 526 522 526 523 519 504 517 150 150 528 522 Mean 1.04 1.09 1.18 1.36 1.55 1.36 1.59 1.27 1.47 1.80 1.50 1.62 1.63 1.58 1.59

Southwest

N 1891 1860 1751 1923 1923 1909 1913 1915 1840 1839 1890 647 628 1895 1894

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 19 07/29/2011

Page 46: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.09 1.14 1.20 1.39 1.58 1.39 1.60 1.38 1.55 1.71 1.52 1.74 1.78 1.59 1.60

N 4759 4684 4338 4832 4825 4792 4801 4809 4618 4619 4731 1502 1468 4779 4755 Mean 1.09 1.14 1.24 1.43 1.67 1.42 1.66 1.42 1.60 1.76 1.59 1.76 1.78 1.66 1.71

MUAP Central

N 57 45 60 58 66 66 62 66 65 57 60 22 22 65 65 Mean 1.00 1.02 1.03 1.07 1.09 1.09 1.11 1.09 1.12 1.37 1.15 1.18 1.32 1.06 1.05

Northwest

N 46 34 45 39 47 47 36 46 45 35 39 14 15 46 46 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.11 1.15 1.06 1.06 1.19 1.13 1.13 1.23 1.13 1.36 1.33 1.04 1.02

Southeast

N 8 6 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.25 1.13 1.25 1.13 1.13 1.38 1.38 1.00 1.00

Southwest

N 23 18 22 21 24 23 23 24 24 22 21 7 8 24 24 Mean 1.04 1.17 1.00 1.33 1.08 1.09 1.22 1.08 1.13 1.18 1.10 1.14 1.13 1.08 1.04

N 134 103 135 126 145 144 129 144 142 122 128 51 53 143 143 Mean 1.04 1.08 1.05 1.14 1.08 1.08 1.16 1.10 1.13 1.28 1.13 1.25 1.30 1.06 1.03

MUSI Central

N 226 211 214 230 235 233 230 233 227 223 227 91 88 233 232 Mean 1.02 1.10 1.13 1.28 1.30 1.27 1.42 1.22 1.37 1.53 1.33 1.47 1.43 1.35 1.40

Northeast

N 21 20 19 20 20 20 20 19 19 17 20 8 8 21 19 Mean 1.05 1.15 1.00 1.60 1.65 1.65 1.90 1.47 1.53 1.88 1.45 1.63 1.63 1.62 1.79

Northwest

N 275 237 262 261 290 287 277 292 275 265 272 142 143 289 288 Mean 1.06 1.15 1.13 1.23 1.33 1.22 1.39 1.28 1.38 1.60 1.29 1.41 1.38 1.26 1.35

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 20 07/29/2011

Page 47: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

MUSI Southeast

N 91 72 88 90 93 92 92 93 88 82 92 36 36 93 91 Mean 1.12 1.15 1.15 1.43 1.56 1.45 1.70 1.38 1.51 2.05 1.66 1.58 1.58 1.40 1.51

Southwest

N 192 178 184 182 194 195 189 194 192 191 184 77 77 193 191 Mean 1.06 1.15 1.14 1.35 1.41 1.36 1.43 1.30 1.44 1.72 1.43 1.62 1.62 1.40 1.41

N 805 718 767 783 832 827 808 831 801 778 795 354 352 829 821 Mean 1.06 1.14 1.13 1.30 1.37 1.30 1.46 1.28 1.41 1.66 1.38 1.49 1.47 1.34 1.40

PHED Central

N 152 98 137 132 154 153 150 154 148 139 138 73 68 153 151 Mean 1.08 1.21 1.15 1.40 1.25 1.39 1.54 1.32 1.45 1.65 1.57 1.41 1.53 1.32 1.34

Northwest

N 45 38 43 43 46 46 44 45 45 43 41 32 32 46 46 Mean 1.00 1.18 1.05 1.21 1.07 1.11 1.11 1.04 1.09 1.40 1.24 1.06 1.22 1.11 1.09

Southwest

N 78 48 71 73 80 80 77 80 78 76 75 39 37 80 80 Mean 1.05 1.27 1.08 1.29 1.06 1.15 1.14 1.08 1.08 1.41 1.11 1.28 1.35 1.10 1.10

N 275 184 251 248 280 279 271 279 271 258 254 144 137 279 277 Mean 1.06 1.22 1.12 1.33 1.17 1.27 1.36 1.20 1.28 1.54 1.38 1.30 1.41 1.22 1.23

PHIL Central

N 309 302 294 314 315 316 314 315 309 307 310 96 89 313 314 Mean 1.06 1.16 1.15 1.39 1.49 1.39 1.60 1.34 1.44 1.69 1.48 1.61 1.62 1.54 1.54

Northeast

N 111 92 109 115 115 115 115 115 109 113 115 41 37 113 113 Mean 1.05 1.17 1.09 1.26 1.35 1.23 1.34 1.23 1.33 1.57 1.31 1.66 1.68 1.29 1.27

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 21 07/29/2011

Page 48: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

PHIL Northwest

N 342 331 330 351 353 352 350 352 342 336 350 94 89 353 349 Mean 1.10 1.13 1.14 1.40 1.46 1.36 1.55 1.27 1.40 1.63 1.47 1.69 1.69 1.46 1.42

Southeast

N 79 75 76 78 80 78 80 80 76 79 79 17 17 78 77 Mean 1.15 1.21 1.17 1.51 1.85 1.55 1.69 1.38 1.64 2.18 1.67 1.53 1.53 1.58 1.73

Southwest

N 183 169 164 186 186 186 185 186 178 179 184 45 42 185 182 Mean 1.08 1.14 1.15 1.32 1.40 1.32 1.52 1.25 1.41 1.70 1.45 1.47 1.48 1.50 1.48

N 1024 969 973 1044 1049 1047 1044 1048 1014 1014 1038 293 274 1042 1035 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.14 1.38 1.47 1.36 1.55 1.29 1.43 1.70 1.47 1.62 1.62 1.48 1.48

PHYS Central

N 171 161 141 176 175 175 173 175 166 168 175 102 102 174 173 Mean 1.17 1.18 1.43 1.68 2.20 1.64 1.92 1.66 1.88 1.96 1.92 1.73 1.86 2.05 2.23

Northwest

N 156 145 140 154 160 160 160 159 154 157 157 119 120 161 160 Mean 1.14 1.12 1.26 1.53 1.80 1.49 1.79 1.57 1.71 1.73 1.73 1.60 1.66 1.73 1.85

Southeast

N 45 44 44 45 45 45 45 45 43 45 45 37 37 45 45 Mean 1.20 1.07 1.20 1.47 1.67 1.53 1.69 1.20 1.40 1.80 1.71 1.68 1.51 1.51 1.60

Southwest

N 284 261 265 287 286 283 285 284 270 280 282 223 219 285 281 Mean 1.12 1.31 1.40 1.58 2.00 1.58 2.00 1.58 1.72 1.81 1.70 1.64 1.67 1.75 1.95

N 656 611 590 662 666 663 663 663 633 650 659 481 478 665 659 Mean 1.14 1.21 1.36 1.58 1.98 1.57 1.91 1.57 1.74 1.83 1.77 1.65 1.70 1.81 1.98

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 22 07/29/2011

Page 49: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

PSYC Central

N 573 568 553 584 583 582 584 584 566 558 577 236 228 581 575 Mean 1.03 1.05 1.14 1.26 1.27 1.28 1.50 1.17 1.34 1.65 1.41 1.51 1.51 1.36 1.30

Northeast

N 380 368 366 387 388 389 384 383 372 359 381 127 124 389 383 Mean 1.11 1.13 1.21 1.42 1.47 1.41 1.52 1.24 1.44 1.75 1.53 1.61 1.61 1.45 1.48

Northwest

N 888 877 860 899 898 895 896 898 858 858 885 255 238 892 889 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.16 1.46 1.52 1.42 1.65 1.37 1.51 1.77 1.59 1.64 1.69 1.55 1.61

Southeast

N 477 467 457 482 483 479 481 482 475 462 478 197 189 482 480 Mean 1.02 1.06 1.12 1.22 1.20 1.19 1.38 1.18 1.27 1.80 1.36 1.56 1.56 1.29 1.24

Southwest

N 1200 1184 1154 1228 1226 1221 1215 1217 1190 1170 1204 454 437 1212 1201 Mean 1.06 1.08 1.15 1.39 1.39 1.36 1.61 1.37 1.49 1.76 1.51 1.63 1.64 1.46 1.47

N 3518 3464 3390 3580 3578 3566 3560 3564 3461 3407 3525 1269 1216 3556 3528 Mean 1.06 1.09 1.16 1.37 1.39 1.34 1.56 1.30 1.44 1.75 1.50 1.60 1.61 1.44 1.44

SGNL Central

N 65 64 65 66 66 65 66 65 63 64 66 16 15 66 64 Mean 1.14 1.41 1.31 1.70 1.86 1.57 1.85 1.80 1.78 2.02 2.08 1.50 1.73 1.62 1.97

N 65 64 65 66 66 65 66 65 63 64 66 16 15 66 64 Mean 1.14 1.41 1.31 1.70 1.86 1.57 1.85 1.80 1.78 2.02 2.08 1.50 1.73 1.62 1.97

SOCI Central

N 290 290 278 298 297 296 296 296 289 286 293 135 132 298 298 Mean 1.18 1.11 1.23 1.48 1.56 1.47 1.56 1.27 1.47 1.70 1.62 1.59 1.61 1.52 1.54

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 23 07/29/2011

Page 50: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

SOCI Northeast

N 215 208 205 220 219 219 215 219 214 204 212 89 88 215 214 Mean 1.06 1.13 1.12 1.28 1.26 1.22 1.34 1.19 1.28 1.69 1.40 1.43 1.48 1.24 1.29

Northwest

N 526 517 493 531 531 526 528 526 513 505 523 189 182 529 529 Mean 1.09 1.14 1.21 1.43 1.63 1.52 1.68 1.40 1.60 1.78 1.61 1.70 1.74 1.47 1.52

Southeast

N 202 197 189 203 204 203 203 204 198 197 199 65 62 203 202 Mean 1.09 1.08 1.13 1.43 1.49 1.40 1.54 1.34 1.51 1.94 1.58 1.78 1.81 1.43 1.47

Southwest

N 813 802 777 827 825 824 821 827 798 780 816 259 254 817 816 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.20 1.46 1.50 1.46 1.62 1.33 1.52 1.81 1.62 1.70 1.72 1.53 1.51

N 2046 2014 1942 2079 2076 2068 2063 2072 2012 1972 2043 737 718 2062 2059 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.19 1.43 1.52 1.45 1.59 1.33 1.51 1.79 1.59 1.65 1.69 1.48 1.49

SPAN Central

N 220 219 212 228 228 227 228 225 213 214 222 117 123 225 224 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.26 1.36 1.57 1.36 1.52 1.29 1.51 1.66 1.54 1.47 1.50 1.44 1.60

Northeast

N 38 38 37 39 39 38 39 39 38 37 39 24 25 39 38 Mean 1.03 1.08 1.16 1.36 1.62 1.37 1.49 1.33 1.50 1.59 1.46 1.54 1.44 1.28 1.61

Northwest

N 205 204 198 209 208 209 209 208 204 197 208 77 88 209 208 Mean 1.11 1.09 1.13 1.24 1.37 1.21 1.43 1.17 1.34 1.51 1.37 1.49 1.45 1.25 1.33

Southeast

N 130 130 129 131 131 131 129 132 124 124 130 60 62 130 126 Mean 1.15 1.15 1.32 1.49 1.68 1.47 1.53 1.55 1.66 2.23 1.68 1.82 1.85 1.65 1.63

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 24 07/29/2011

Page 51: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

SPAN Southwest

N 190 184 183 192 192 191 190 190 182 182 188 47 52 191 189 Mean 1.04 1.22 1.20 1.38 1.51 1.34 1.64 1.54 1.47 1.79 1.41 1.72 1.79 1.34 1.61

N 783 775 759 799 798 796 795 794 761 754 787 325 350 794 785 Mean 1.09 1.14 1.22 1.36 1.52 1.33 1.52 1.36 1.48 1.74 1.48 1.58 1.59 1.39 1.54

SPCH Central

N 321 318 299 315 325 324 321 321 311 304 319 98 96 325 321 Mean 1.15 1.16 1.26 1.43 1.49 1.40 1.62 1.55 1.53 1.85 1.60 1.73 1.78 1.49 1.59

Northeast

N 418 381 399 413 424 424 421 420 413 403 418 160 159 424 419 Mean 1.08 1.22 1.13 1.39 1.34 1.32 1.39 1.32 1.37 1.70 1.41 1.54 1.53 1.34 1.37

Northwest

N 354 272 321 334 361 362 351 361 353 342 352 105 105 360 356 Mean 1.05 1.22 1.12 1.26 1.19 1.19 1.25 1.18 1.24 1.54 1.31 1.46 1.49 1.23 1.21

Southeast

N 356 352 342 362 365 365 363 365 361 353 364 145 141 358 356 Mean 1.07 1.08 1.12 1.35 1.28 1.31 1.41 1.22 1.37 1.87 1.40 1.47 1.45 1.35 1.32

Southwest

N 387 384 359 398 400 401 399 400 390 382 394 144 133 399 398 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.16 1.39 1.36 1.35 1.51 1.28 1.41 1.61 1.39 1.51 1.54 1.35 1.40

N 1836 1707 1720 1822 1875 1876 1855 1867 1828 1784 1847 652 634 1866 1850 Mean 1.08 1.16 1.16 1.37 1.33 1.31 1.43 1.30 1.38 1.71 1.42 1.53 1.54 1.35 1.37

TECA Central

N 109 107 104 110 110 110 110 110 105 105 110 44 44 109 108 Mean 1.05 1.06 1.10 1.39 1.31 1.35 1.48 1.22 1.28 1.55 1.33 1.52 1.48 1.44 1.51

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 25 07/29/2011

Page 52: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

TECA Northeast

N 48 46 44 48 48 48 47 48 48 44 46 16 16 48 48 Mean 1.06 1.07 1.07 1.42 1.48 1.42 1.51 1.44 1.54 1.73 1.65 1.44 1.44 1.50 1.56

Northwest

N 100 100 99 101 101 101 100 101 99 94 99 25 24 100 101 Mean 1.05 1.05 1.11 1.49 1.24 1.26 1.38 1.19 1.30 1.57 1.32 1.36 1.46 1.27 1.22

Southeast

N 29 29 28 30 30 30 29 29 30 27 30 11 11 30 30 Mean 1.10 1.10 1.14 1.20 1.27 1.17 1.34 1.07 1.27 1.26 1.37 1.82 1.91 1.33 1.33

Southwest

N 178 174 170 176 181 180 178 179 180 175 177 73 74 180 180 Mean 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.16 1.12 1.11 1.26 1.08 1.09 1.49 1.18 1.33 1.42 1.17 1.16

N 464 456 445 465 470 469 464 467 462 445 462 169 169 467 467 Mean 1.04 1.05 1.08 1.31 1.24 1.23 1.37 1.17 1.24 1.53 1.30 1.43 1.47 1.30 1.30

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_ACAD.pdf 26 07/29/2011

Page 53: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ABDR Northeast

N 73 72 69 77 77 76 77 75 77 77 73 77 75 76 76 Mean 1.10 1.19 1.22 1.42 1.47 1.49 1.69 1.47 1.55 1.74 1.59 1.42 1.63 1.46 1.54

N 73 72 69 77 77 76 77 75 77 77 73 77 75 76 76 Mean 1.10 1.19 1.22 1.42 1.47 1.49 1.69 1.47 1.55 1.74 1.59 1.42 1.63 1.46 1.54

ACCT Central

N 179 174 164 181 182 179 178 180 172 175 178 80 79 178 176 Mean 1.07 1.16 1.30 1.59 1.62 1.54 1.80 1.54 1.69 1.77 1.72 1.93 1.95 1.74 1.73

Northeast

N 58 58 52 61 61 61 60 60 61 57 59 20 19 58 58 Mean 1.16 1.02 1.31 1.72 1.80 1.59 1.78 1.48 1.64 1.88 1.63 1.85 2.11 1.64 1.72

Northwest

N 241 240 223 243 241 239 241 243 234 236 234 83 80 235 236 Mean 1.11 1.11 1.30 1.59 1.79 1.48 1.73 1.44 1.69 1.72 1.66 1.77 1.80 1.75 1.82

Southeast

N 22 22 19 22 22 21 21 22 22 19 21 9 9 22 22 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.16 1.36 1.36 1.38 2.00 1.09 1.05 1.53 1.38 1.78 1.78 1.36 1.45

Southwest

N 477 473 451 496 497 494 497 493 475 480 485 208 209 493 490 Mean 1.11 1.15 1.22 1.48 1.63 1.44 1.64 1.34 1.53 1.64 1.57 1.62 1.62 1.56 1.65

N 977 967 909 1003 1003 994 997 998 964 967 977 400 396 986 982 Mean 1.10 1.13 1.26 1.54 1.67 1.48 1.71 1.41 1.59 1.70 1.62 1.73 1.75 1.64 1.70

ACNT Central

N 99 92 87 98 100 97 99 100 94 96 99 30 30 100 99 Mean 1.05 1.12 1.24 1.35 1.48 1.37 1.47 1.26 1.46 1.57 1.40 1.40 1.47 1.53 1.44

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 1 07/29/2011

Page 54: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ACNT Northeast

N 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 1 2 8 8 Mean 1.44 1.00 1.50 1.89 2.67 2.22 2.11 2.56 3.22 2.63 3.33 2.00 2.00 3.13 3.38

Northwest

N 159 159 147 159 164 165 164 165 151 157 160 51 51 163 162 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.14 1.46 1.69 1.44 1.76 1.41 1.62 1.74 1.55 1.63 1.59 1.51 1.60

Southeast

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 4 4 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.25 1.13 1.13 1.14 1.13 1.25 1.25 1.38 1.25

Southwest

N 355 341 322 359 361 360 358 360 350 345 351 137 135 359 358 Mean 1.08 1.11 1.23 1.50 1.68 1.44 1.61 1.37 1.54 1.69 1.58 1.63 1.70 1.57 1.66

N 630 609 572 633 642 639 638 642 612 613 627 223 222 638 635 Mean 1.08 1.11 1.21 1.47 1.66 1.44 1.63 1.38 1.56 1.69 1.56 1.59 1.64 1.57 1.63

ARCE Northwest

N 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 8 8 12 12 Mean 1.25 1.25 1.27 1.83 2.00 1.75 1.92 1.92 2.08 1.75 1.83 2.00 1.88 2.00 1.92

Southwest

N 13 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 10 10 13 13 Mean 1.08 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.46 1.15 1.31 1.15 1.23 1.54 1.38 1.50 1.40 1.38 1.54

N 25 24 23 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 18 18 25 25 Mean 1.16 1.17 1.13 1.40 1.72 1.44 1.60 1.52 1.64 1.64 1.60 1.72 1.61 1.68 1.72

ARTC Southwest

N 396 255 375 344 393 394 383 395 376 362 384 190 196 396 387 Mean 1.05 1.34 1.17 1.52 1.52 1.34 1.56 1.43 1.49 1.71 1.55 1.59 1.54 1.43 1.58

N 396 255 375 344 393 394 383 395 376 362 384 190 196 396 387

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 2 07/29/2011

Page 55: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.05 1.34 1.17 1.52 1.52 1.34 1.56 1.43 1.49 1.71 1.55 1.59 1.54 1.43 1.58

ARTV Southwest

N 55 47 50 46 55 55 54 55 52 53 53 28 30 55 54 Mean 1.09 1.21 1.14 1.78 1.60 1.40 1.74 1.35 1.63 1.60 1.81 1.79 1.60 1.53 1.44

N 55 47 50 46 55 55 54 55 52 53 53 28 30 55 54 Mean 1.09 1.21 1.14 1.78 1.60 1.40 1.74 1.35 1.63 1.60 1.81 1.79 1.60 1.53 1.44

AUMT Northeast

N 283 281 278 296 295 296 296 297 297 290 287 292 291 297 292 Mean 1.08 1.10 1.19 1.34 1.39 1.36 1.43 1.26 1.34 1.76 1.48 1.24 1.35 1.33 1.39

N 283 281 278 296 295 296 296 297 297 290 287 292 291 297 292 Mean 1.08 1.10 1.19 1.34 1.39 1.36 1.43 1.26 1.34 1.76 1.48 1.24 1.35 1.33 1.39

BARB Southeast

N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 31 31 26 26 32 32 Mean 1.00 1.03 1.03 1.19 1.19 1.16 1.16 1.22 1.13 1.16 1.16 1.15 1.15 1.19 1.16

N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 31 31 26 26 32 32 Mean 1.00 1.03 1.03 1.19 1.19 1.16 1.16 1.22 1.13 1.16 1.16 1.15 1.15 1.19 1.16

BIOM Northeast

N 15 14 13 14 15 14 14 15 15 14 13 8 7 14 15 Mean 1.00 1.36 1.62 1.64 1.53 1.50 1.64 1.33 1.67 1.57 1.54 2.00 1.86 1.71 1.67

N 15 14 13 14 15 14 14 15 15 14 13 8 7 14 15 Mean 1.00 1.36 1.62 1.64 1.53 1.50 1.64 1.33 1.67 1.57 1.54 2.00 1.86 1.71 1.67

BMGT Central

N 53 52 48 53 53 53 53 53 51 49 52 19 16 53 53 Mean 1.02 1.00 1.10 1.25 1.30 1.25 1.38 1.19 1.39 1.88 1.31 1.68 1.94 1.40 1.32

Northeast

N 29 28 25 30 30 30 30 30 29 29 29 7 8 30 30 Mean 1.00 1.07 1.12 1.13 1.33 1.17 1.33 1.27 1.34 1.45 1.34 1.86 1.75 1.33 1.13

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 3 07/29/2011

Page 56: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

BMGT Northwest

N 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 28 28 15 14 29 29 Mean 1.10 1.07 1.17 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.48 1.28 1.41 1.64 1.46 1.33 1.36 1.34 1.34

Southwest

N 61 61 61 62 64 64 64 64 63 63 64 26 26 64 64 Mean 1.07 1.03 1.07 1.24 1.20 1.14 1.36 1.19 1.19 1.40 1.30 1.27 1.46 1.20 1.20

N 172 170 163 174 176 176 176 176 172 169 173 67 64 176 176 Mean 1.05 1.04 1.10 1.24 1.28 1.21 1.38 1.22 1.31 1.59 1.34 1.46 1.59 1.31 1.25

BNKG Central

N 11 6 8 7 11 10 9 11 11 9 8 7 7 10 11 Mean 1.00 1.50 1.13 1.29 1.36 1.20 1.33 1.27 1.27 1.56 1.38 1.71 1.86 1.20 1.27

N 11 6 8 7 11 10 9 11 11 9 8 7 7 10 11 Mean 1.00 1.50 1.13 1.29 1.36 1.20 1.33 1.27 1.27 1.56 1.38 1.71 1.86 1.20 1.27

BUSG Central

N 88 82 80 87 89 89 86 88 87 87 87 43 41 89 89 Mean 1.03 1.07 1.10 1.15 1.19 1.21 1.40 1.14 1.22 1.56 1.32 1.40 1.37 1.24 1.19

Northeast

N 33 33 29 33 33 33 32 32 33 31 33 10 10 33 32 Mean 1.03 1.00 1.10 1.18 1.21 1.21 1.56 1.19 1.30 1.77 1.42 1.40 1.60 1.21 1.22

Northwest

N 97 92 93 96 101 100 99 101 98 97 98 27 26 101 100 Mean 1.04 1.14 1.15 1.27 1.27 1.35 1.51 1.26 1.37 1.37 1.30 1.37 1.46 1.24 1.18

Southeast

N 20 17 19 18 20 20 17 20 20 16 16 2 2 20 20 Mean 1.05 1.00 1.11 1.44 1.35 1.50 1.35 1.20 1.50 1.81 1.63 2.00 2.00 1.25 1.30

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 4 07/29/2011

Page 57: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

BUSG Southwest

N 146 139 140 140 147 144 144 144 139 133 141 62 60 146 145 Mean 1.07 1.12 1.19 1.49 1.32 1.35 1.57 1.33 1.49 1.68 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.40 1.41

N 384 363 361 374 390 386 378 385 377 364 375 144 139 389 386 Mean 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.33 1.27 1.31 1.50 1.25 1.38 1.58 1.40 1.49 1.55 1.30 1.28

CDEC Central

N 160 149 153 159 161 161 159 160 153 153 159 116 116 163 158 Mean 1.13 1.05 1.14 1.39 1.43 1.33 1.51 1.32 1.35 1.52 1.50 1.42 1.50 1.47 1.62

N 160 149 153 159 161 161 159 160 153 153 159 116 116 163 158 Mean 1.13 1.05 1.14 1.39 1.43 1.33 1.51 1.32 1.35 1.52 1.50 1.42 1.50 1.47 1.62

CETT Northeast

N 74 69 65 76 76 76 76 76 74 73 76 74 74 76 76 Mean 1.07 1.32 1.26 1.45 1.41 1.37 1.57 1.29 1.30 1.52 1.47 1.43 1.39 1.43 1.58

N 74 69 65 76 76 76 76 76 74 73 76 74 74 76 76 Mean 1.07 1.32 1.26 1.45 1.41 1.37 1.57 1.29 1.30 1.52 1.47 1.43 1.39 1.43 1.58

CHEF Central

N 313 273 295 316 322 321 320 318 314 308 317 270 269 318 318 Mean 1.03 1.06 1.08 1.27 1.26 1.23 1.37 1.24 1.24 1.46 1.32 1.29 1.28 1.26 1.28

N 313 273 295 316 322 321 320 318 314 308 317 270 269 318 318 Mean 1.03 1.06 1.08 1.27 1.26 1.23 1.37 1.24 1.24 1.46 1.32 1.29 1.28 1.26 1.28

CHLT Coleman

N 44 13 44 34 44 43 36 44 44 34 44 16 17 43 43 Mean 1.09 1.77 1.05 1.44 1.30 1.44 1.53 1.16 1.30 1.53 1.34 1.56 1.47 1.26 1.26

N 44 13 44 34 44 43 36 44 44 34 44 16 17 43 43 Mean 1.09 1.77 1.05 1.44 1.30 1.44 1.53 1.16 1.30 1.53 1.34 1.56 1.47 1.26 1.26

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 5 07/29/2011

Page 58: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CJLE Northeast

N 7 6 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 2 2 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.86 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 7 6 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 2 2 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.86 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

CJSA Northeast

N 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

CMSW Coleman

N 50 49 45 48 49 50 49 50 48 47 47 22 23 50 50 Mean 1.04 1.41 1.16 1.52 1.47 1.44 1.61 1.24 1.33 1.51 1.60 1.55 1.43 1.52 1.62

N 50 49 45 48 49 50 49 50 48 47 47 22 23 50 50 Mean 1.04 1.41 1.16 1.52 1.47 1.44 1.61 1.24 1.33 1.51 1.60 1.55 1.43 1.52 1.62

CNBT Central

N 34 31 29 35 34 34 34 34 33 34 34 19 19 28 27 Mean 1.41 1.48 1.52 1.91 2.06 2.06 2.15 1.97 2.12 2.09 2.00 1.68 1.74 1.43 1.41

N 34 31 29 35 34 34 34 34 33 34 34 19 19 28 27 Mean 1.41 1.48 1.52 1.91 2.06 2.06 2.15 1.97 2.12 2.09 2.00 1.68 1.74 1.43 1.41

CPMT Northeast

N 64 60 61 63 64 63 64 64 56 56 59 42 44 64 58 Mean 1.14 1.17 1.20 1.35 2.25 1.49 1.83 1.38 1.59 2.21 1.90 1.55 1.52 1.77 1.67

Northwest

N 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 13 11 11 14 14 Mean 1.23 1.00 1.08 1.14 1.64 1.21 1.43 1.36 1.36 1.57 1.38 1.36 1.45 1.57 1.71

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 6 07/29/2011

Page 59: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 77 73 74 77 78 77 78 78 70 70 72 53 55 78 72 Mean 1.16 1.14 1.18 1.31 2.14 1.44 1.76 1.37 1.54 2.09 1.81 1.51 1.51 1.73 1.68

CSME Northeast

N 144 141 137 147 148 148 147 148 147 140 147 144 143 148 148 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.12 1.22 1.31 1.28 1.47 1.29 1.28 1.71 1.29 1.20 1.22 1.26 1.34

Northwest

N 240 240 237 250 249 248 246 246 246 232 248 239 237 248 247 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.18 1.52 1.73 1.50 1.55 1.54 1.50 1.93 1.54 1.56 1.59 1.57 1.64

Southeast

N 219 216 214 225 225 223 224 225 225 212 226 216 215 225 221 Mean 1.08 1.19 1.21 1.43 1.51 1.40 1.49 1.49 1.60 1.79 1.63 1.52 1.60 1.57 1.61

N 603 597 588 622 622 619 617 619 618 584 621 599 595 621 616 Mean 1.08 1.16 1.17 1.42 1.55 1.41 1.51 1.46 1.48 1.82 1.52 1.46 1.50 1.50 1.56

CTEC Northeast

N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.13 1.07 1.20 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.13 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.00

N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.13 1.07 1.20 1.07 1.07 1.20 1.13 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.00

CTMT Coleman

N 47 40 40 41 46 45 44 46 46 46 46 34 32 46 46 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.13 1.51 1.52 1.38 1.64 1.35 1.46 1.76 1.46 1.32 1.41 1.48 1.59

N 47 40 40 41 46 45 44 46 46 46 46 34 32 46 46 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.13 1.51 1.52 1.38 1.64 1.35 1.46 1.76 1.46 1.32 1.41 1.48 1.59

DAAC Coleman

N 82 82 81 79 82 82 81 81 79 77 80 39 39 82 82 Mean 1.13 1.06 1.14 1.57 1.60 1.41 1.67 1.33 1.42 1.66 1.46 1.54 1.51 1.34 1.51

N 82 82 81 79 82 82 81 81 79 77 80 39 39 82 82

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 7 07/29/2011

Page 60: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.13 1.06 1.14 1.57 1.60 1.41 1.67 1.33 1.42 1.66 1.46 1.54 1.51 1.34 1.51

DEMR Northeast

N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00

N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00

DFTG Northeast

N 67 59 62 61 70 68 62 70 69 62 61 51 56 69 67 Mean 1.22 1.29 1.21 1.52 1.66 1.46 1.58 1.40 1.49 1.66 1.36 1.65 1.55 1.55 1.64

Northwest

N 146 140 136 145 148 148 148 148 144 143 146 87 97 147 147 Mean 1.08 1.12 1.19 1.43 1.68 1.41 1.58 1.35 1.48 1.49 1.46 1.60 1.58 1.59 1.65

Southeast

N 80 75 74 75 78 79 76 79 79 76 79 43 45 79 79 Mean 1.14 1.24 1.22 1.59 1.74 1.59 1.64 1.58 1.71 1.71 1.80 1.74 1.73 1.66 1.76

Southwest

N 173 169 166 169 179 180 172 180 173 171 170 108 116 173 172 Mean 1.18 1.21 1.25 1.70 1.77 1.53 1.49 1.43 1.62 1.68 1.62 1.72 1.65 1.63 1.82

N 466 443 438 450 475 475 458 477 465 452 456 289 314 468 465 Mean 1.15 1.20 1.22 1.57 1.72 1.49 1.56 1.43 1.57 1.62 1.57 1.67 1.62 1.61 1.73

DHYG Coleman

N 84 83 82 82 84 82 85 86 85 86 85 66 61 84 84 Mean 1.13 1.18 1.40 1.93 2.06 1.84 2.25 1.87 1.87 1.95 1.88 1.71 1.85 1.79 1.79

N 84 83 82 82 84 82 85 86 85 86 85 66 61 84 84 Mean 1.13 1.18 1.40 1.93 2.06 1.84 2.25 1.87 1.87 1.95 1.88 1.71 1.85 1.79 1.79

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 8 07/29/2011

Page 61: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

DMSO Coleman

N 53 53 50 52 53 51 53 53 52 53 52 41 41 53 53 Mean 1.21 1.23 1.24 2.08 2.11 1.67 2.17 1.34 1.33 1.66 1.98 1.66 1.61 1.57 1.66

N 53 53 50 52 53 51 53 53 52 53 52 41 41 53 53 Mean 1.21 1.23 1.24 2.08 2.11 1.67 2.17 1.34 1.33 1.66 1.98 1.66 1.61 1.57 1.66

DNTA Coleman

N 107 107 107 107 107 108 108 108 108 108 107 95 95 107 106 Mean 1.09 1.05 1.11 1.48 1.51 1.49 1.77 1.46 1.69 1.77 1.71 1.48 1.52 1.72 1.58

N 107 107 107 107 107 108 108 108 108 108 107 95 95 107 106 Mean 1.09 1.05 1.11 1.48 1.51 1.49 1.77 1.46 1.69 1.77 1.71 1.48 1.52 1.72 1.58

ECRD Coleman

N 30 30 30 29 30 30 30 30 29 29 30 29 28 30 30 Mean 1.13 1.07 1.07 1.52 1.50 1.40 1.60 1.30 1.31 1.83 1.50 1.28 1.32 1.50 1.30

N 30 30 30 29 30 30 30 30 29 29 30 29 28 30 30 Mean 1.13 1.07 1.07 1.52 1.50 1.40 1.60 1.30 1.31 1.83 1.50 1.28 1.32 1.50 1.30

ELMT Central

N 23 22 24 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 25 24 24 25 25 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.04 1.38 1.27 1.27 1.58 1.31 1.35 1.77 1.60 1.38 1.42 1.32 1.28

N 23 22 24 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 25 24 24 25 25 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.04 1.38 1.27 1.27 1.58 1.31 1.35 1.77 1.60 1.38 1.42 1.32 1.28

ELPT Central

N 120 118 118 121 121 119 120 121 121 121 119 113 113 117 117 Mean 1.13 1.14 1.12 1.40 1.42 1.33 1.38 1.36 1.36 1.47 1.46 1.35 1.38 1.27 1.26

N 120 118 118 121 121 119 120 121 121 121 119 113 113 117 117 Mean 1.13 1.14 1.12 1.40 1.42 1.33 1.38 1.36 1.36 1.47 1.46 1.35 1.38 1.27 1.26

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 9 07/29/2011

Page 62: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

EMSP Northeast

N 18 15 17 13 18 16 18 18 18 18 18 16 15 17 18 Mean 1.33 1.27 1.18 1.54 1.33 1.38 2.67 1.28 1.61 1.67 2.17 1.56 1.80 1.53 1.72

Northwest

N 16 16 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 15 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.27 1.38 1.19 1.31 2.63 1.25 1.19 1.81 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.33

Southwest

N 31 31 30 31 31 30 31 29 31 30 31 20 20 30 30 Mean 1.03 1.03 1.30 1.68 1.97 1.47 1.84 1.41 1.68 1.90 2.03 1.45 1.50 1.53 1.50

N 65 62 62 60 65 62 65 63 65 64 65 52 51 63 63 Mean 1.11 1.08 1.26 1.57 1.60 1.40 2.26 1.33 1.54 1.81 1.94 1.42 1.51 1.46 1.52

ENTC Central

N 6 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 Mean 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.17 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.33 1.50

N 6 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 Mean 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.17 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.33 1.50

ETWR Southwest

N 19 19 18 12 19 17 11 19 16 9 13 6 7 18 18 Mean 2.05 1.47 2.00 2.25 3.11 2.71 2.27 1.79 2.19 1.89 2.85 1.83 1.86 2.39 3.22

N 19 19 18 12 19 17 11 19 16 9 13 6 7 18 18 Mean 2.05 1.47 2.00 2.25 3.11 2.71 2.27 1.79 2.19 1.89 2.85 1.83 1.86 2.39 3.22

FITT Central

N 34 29 34 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 35 25 27 36 36 Mean 1.15 1.31 1.06 1.42 1.42 1.31 1.53 1.31 1.58 1.53 1.63 1.44 1.44 1.36 1.44

N 34 29 34 36 36 36 36 36 36 36 35 25 27 36 36 Mean 1.15 1.31 1.06 1.42 1.42 1.31 1.53 1.31 1.58 1.53 1.63 1.44 1.44 1.36 1.44

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 10 07/29/2011

Page 63: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

FLMC Central

N 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 4 4 11 10 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.82 1.64 1.64 2.00 1.64 1.91 1.82 2.09 1.25 1.25 1.64 1.70

Northwest

N 128 124 121 128 128 125 123 126 120 122 120 76 78 129 128 Mean 1.13 1.23 1.17 1.42 1.48 1.44 1.57 1.46 1.33 1.43 1.53 1.49 1.56 1.38 1.54

Southwest

N 45 43 43 43 44 42 43 44 43 42 43 34 36 43 43 Mean 1.24 1.19 1.14 1.67 1.68 1.60 1.67 1.82 1.86 1.79 1.95 1.79 1.83 1.88 1.86

N 184 178 175 182 183 178 177 181 174 175 174 114 118 183 181 Mean 1.16 1.21 1.16 1.51 1.54 1.49 1.62 1.56 1.50 1.54 1.67 1.57 1.64 1.51 1.62

FSHD Central

N 345 271 330 316 352 352 329 352 346 315 337 231 235 351 350 Mean 1.04 1.16 1.11 1.28 1.23 1.18 1.24 1.14 1.24 1.51 1.32 1.28 1.23 1.20 1.22

N 345 271 330 316 352 352 329 352 346 315 337 231 235 351 350 Mean 1.04 1.16 1.11 1.28 1.23 1.18 1.24 1.14 1.24 1.51 1.32 1.28 1.23 1.20 1.22

FSHN Central

N 93 81 82 82 95 95 92 94 93 90 87 51 50 95 95 Mean 1.17 1.21 1.30 1.48 1.56 1.33 1.45 1.37 1.44 1.76 1.56 1.69 1.74 1.38 1.48

N 93 81 82 82 95 95 92 94 93 90 87 51 50 95 95 Mean 1.17 1.21 1.30 1.48 1.56 1.33 1.45 1.37 1.44 1.76 1.56 1.69 1.74 1.38 1.48

GAME Southwest

N 306 210 284 292 312 313 310 313 295 304 305 129 134 309 309 Mean 1.13 1.30 1.15 1.46 1.48 1.41 1.59 1.41 1.50 1.54 1.62 1.71 1.68 1.52 1.51

N 306 210 284 292 312 313 310 313 295 304 305 129 134 309 309 Mean 1.13 1.30 1.15 1.46 1.48 1.41 1.59 1.41 1.50 1.54 1.62 1.71 1.68 1.52 1.51

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 11 07/29/2011

Page 64: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

GISC Southwest

N 41 31 41 35 41 41 40 41 39 39 39 19 28 41 41 Mean 1.34 1.16 1.17 1.83 2.34 1.54 2.20 1.95 1.87 1.79 2.23 2.00 1.86 1.80 2.27

N 41 31 41 35 41 41 40 41 39 39 39 19 28 41 41 Mean 1.34 1.16 1.17 1.83 2.34 1.54 2.20 1.95 1.87 1.79 2.23 2.00 1.86 1.80 2.27

HALT Northwest

N 77 71 74 79 79 79 79 78 77 77 77 65 64 79 79 Mean 1.12 1.17 1.14 1.38 1.46 1.46 1.53 1.31 1.47 1.77 1.60 1.55 1.58 1.46 1.47

N 77 71 74 79 79 79 79 78 77 77 77 65 64 79 79 Mean 1.12 1.17 1.14 1.38 1.46 1.46 1.53 1.31 1.47 1.77 1.60 1.55 1.58 1.46 1.47

HAMG Central

N 64 57 55 63 65 65 65 65 65 64 64 29 27 65 65 Mean 1.05 1.16 1.29 1.29 1.45 1.26 1.35 1.25 1.32 1.64 1.42 1.41 1.48 1.37 1.34

N 64 57 55 63 65 65 65 65 65 64 64 29 27 65 65 Mean 1.05 1.16 1.29 1.29 1.45 1.26 1.35 1.25 1.32 1.64 1.42 1.41 1.48 1.37 1.34

HART Central

N 214 225 216 232 237 236 229 238 233 224 226 219 217 234 234 Mean 1.14 1.17 1.16 1.44 1.56 1.47 1.52 1.49 1.45 1.73 1.51 1.46 1.49 1.44 1.56

Southeast

N 28 26 27 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 27 28 28 Mean 1.11 1.27 1.11 1.54 1.57 1.57 1.68 1.36 1.50 1.64 1.68 1.25 1.48 1.50 1.39

N 242 251 243 260 265 264 257 266 261 252 254 247 244 262 262 Mean 1.14 1.18 1.15 1.45 1.56 1.48 1.54 1.48 1.46 1.72 1.53 1.43 1.49 1.44 1.54

HITT Coleman

N 30 30 29 30 30 30 28 29 27 27 27 21 21 29 29 Mean 1.00 1.10 1.21 1.60 1.60 1.57 1.68 1.41 1.48 1.44 1.78 1.33 1.33 1.52 1.62

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 12 07/29/2011

Page 65: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 30 30 29 30 30 30 28 29 27 27 27 21 21 29 29 Mean 1.00 1.10 1.21 1.60 1.60 1.57 1.68 1.41 1.48 1.44 1.78 1.33 1.33 1.52 1.62

HLAB Coleman

N 70 67 68 70 71 71 71 71 69 68 71 67 66 71 71 Mean 1.03 1.12 1.09 1.27 1.41 1.30 1.48 1.23 1.43 1.46 1.35 1.24 1.24 1.35 1.39

N 70 67 68 70 71 71 71 71 69 68 71 67 66 71 71 Mean 1.03 1.12 1.09 1.27 1.41 1.30 1.48 1.23 1.43 1.46 1.35 1.24 1.24 1.35 1.39

HPRS Coleman

N 667 657 650 675 680 680 673 678 670 647 666 388 388 675 671 Mean 1.05 1.14 1.13 1.31 1.30 1.33 1.46 1.22 1.36 1.73 1.44 1.50 1.53 1.31 1.30

N 667 657 650 675 680 680 673 678 670 647 666 388 388 675 671 Mean 1.05 1.14 1.13 1.31 1.30 1.33 1.46 1.22 1.36 1.73 1.44 1.50 1.53 1.31 1.30

HRPO Central

N 23 24 21 24 24 23 24 24 22 21 23 4 5 24 25 Mean 1.30 1.21 1.57 2.13 2.17 1.78 1.92 2.17 2.18 2.05 1.78 2.50 2.80 1.92 2.12

Northeast

N 22 21 19 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 3 3 22 22 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.18 1.27 1.36 1.55 1.23 1.45 1.68 1.45 1.33 1.00 1.45 1.36

Northwest

N 16 16 15 16 16 16 16 16 14 15 16 4 3 16 16 Mean 1.00 1.06 1.07 1.38 1.13 1.31 1.25 1.13 1.29 1.33 1.19 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.31

Southwest

N 42 42 40 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 22 21 43 42 Mean 1.05 1.10 1.18 1.37 1.19 1.26 1.63 1.30 1.35 1.88 1.56 1.68 1.81 1.33 1.45

N 103 103 95 105 105 104 105 105 101 101 104 33 32 105 105 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.22 1.50 1.42 1.40 1.62 1.46 1.54 1.79 1.53 1.67 1.81 1.48 1.57

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 13 07/29/2011

Page 66: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

IBUS Central

N 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 6 6 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.36 1.09 1.09 1.30 1.09 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.00

Northwest

N 28 27 25 28 28 28 28 28 28 26 28 10 10 28 28 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.04 1.14 1.11 1.11 1.18 1.11 1.29 1.08 1.29 1.10 1.30 1.11 1.11

Southwest

N 10 9 10 10 10 10 9 10 10 10 10 4 4 10 9 Mean 1.70 1.22 2.00 2.60 2.80 2.00 2.89 2.60 2.90 2.70 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.89

N 49 47 46 49 49 49 48 49 49 46 49 20 20 49 48 Mean 1.18 1.13 1.24 1.41 1.43 1.29 1.54 1.41 1.57 1.48 1.49 1.40 1.45 1.47 1.60

IMED Southwest

N 81 67 75 63 82 80 76 81 81 77 78 38 44 82 82 Mean 1.05 1.22 1.20 1.70 1.67 1.43 1.68 1.28 1.57 1.60 1.73 1.71 1.73 1.51 1.51

N 81 67 75 63 82 80 76 81 81 77 78 38 44 82 82 Mean 1.05 1.22 1.20 1.70 1.67 1.43 1.68 1.28 1.57 1.60 1.73 1.71 1.73 1.51 1.51

INDS Central

N 133 130 124 117 132 132 133 133 132 132 131 83 86 135 132 Mean 1.02 1.12 1.02 1.39 1.44 1.34 1.47 1.43 1.40 1.48 1.50 1.53 1.50 1.34 1.39

N 133 130 124 117 132 132 133 133 132 132 131 83 86 135 132 Mean 1.02 1.12 1.02 1.39 1.44 1.34 1.47 1.43 1.40 1.48 1.50 1.53 1.50 1.34 1.39

INEW Southwest

N 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.22 1.22 1.11 1.22 1.11 1.11 1.22 1.22 1.17 1.00 1.33 1.22

N 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 6 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.22 1.22 1.11 1.22 1.11 1.11 1.22 1.22 1.17 1.00 1.33 1.22

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 14 07/29/2011

Page 67: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

INMT Central

N 19 19 20 19 20 20 19 20 20 20 19 17 17 20 20 Mean 1.11 1.16 1.10 1.42 1.45 1.40 1.32 1.25 1.40 1.65 1.42 1.35 1.59 1.70 1.50

N 19 19 20 19 20 20 19 20 20 20 19 17 17 20 20 Mean 1.11 1.16 1.10 1.42 1.45 1.40 1.32 1.25 1.40 1.65 1.42 1.35 1.59 1.70 1.50

INTC Northeast

N 20 20 19 21 21 21 21 20 20 21 21 20 20 20 20 Mean 1.05 1.20 1.21 1.48 2.00 1.76 1.95 1.35 1.65 2.05 1.52 1.75 1.65 1.50 1.90

N 20 20 19 21 21 21 21 20 20 21 21 20 20 20 20 Mean 1.05 1.20 1.21 1.48 2.00 1.76 1.95 1.35 1.65 2.05 1.52 1.75 1.65 1.50 1.90

ITCC Northwest

N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.33 1.17 1.17 1.50 1.17 1.33 1.33 1.17 1.33

Southwest

N 17 15 17 17 17 17 17 17 16 16 16 12 12 17 17 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.12 1.18 1.12 1.24 1.12 1.06 1.38 1.25 1.25 1.17 1.18 1.24

N 23 21 23 23 23 23 23 23 22 22 22 18 18 23 23 Mean 1.00 1.10 1.04 1.13 1.17 1.13 1.26 1.13 1.09 1.41 1.23 1.28 1.22 1.17 1.26

ITMT Central

N 25 25 25 27 27 26 26 27 26 27 27 23 24 27 27 Mean 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.41 1.30 1.23 1.42 1.26 1.27 1.30 1.48 1.48 1.63 1.41 1.48

Southwest

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.20 1.60 1.40 1.20 2.00 1.40 1.67 1.50 1.40 1.20

N 30 30 30 32 32 31 31 32 31 32 32 26 28 32 32 Mean 1.03 1.07 1.03 1.38 1.31 1.23 1.45 1.28 1.26 1.41 1.47 1.50 1.61 1.41 1.44

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 15 07/29/2011

Page 68: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ITNW Central

N 23 21 18 23 23 22 22 23 21 22 22 9 9 22 21 Mean 1.04 1.33 1.17 1.35 1.61 1.55 1.73 1.26 1.33 1.82 1.68 1.56 1.67 1.68 1.57

Northwest

N 12 11 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 4 4 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.45 1.10 1.58 1.75 1.42 1.67 1.42 1.50 1.64 1.42 2.75 2.50 1.75 1.58

Southwest

N 14 14 15 15 16 16 16 16 13 13 15 10 11 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.63 1.50 1.31 1.46 1.40 1.30 1.18 1.27 1.33

N 49 46 43 50 51 50 50 51 46 46 49 23 24 49 48 Mean 1.02 1.26 1.14 1.36 1.51 1.40 1.68 1.37 1.37 1.67 1.53 1.65 1.58 1.57 1.50

ITSC Central

N 75 73 69 76 74 73 73 74 74 73 67 55 54 76 72 Mean 1.24 1.22 1.26 1.76 2.00 1.78 1.84 1.76 1.85 1.86 1.79 1.98 2.06 1.92 2.07

Northeast

N 37 36 33 37 37 37 37 37 36 36 36 17 18 37 37 Mean 1.19 1.14 1.21 1.46 1.70 1.49 1.62 1.32 1.47 1.72 1.75 1.88 1.94 1.68 1.73

Northwest

N 96 96 94 98 97 98 98 98 95 96 97 63 67 98 98 Mean 1.15 1.29 1.23 1.47 1.70 1.49 1.56 1.41 1.53 1.68 1.48 1.59 1.60 1.51 1.66

Southeast

N 31 31 30 29 31 31 31 31 31 28 30 22 22 31 31 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.24 1.32 1.23 1.35 1.29 1.39 1.68 1.40 1.18 1.18 1.23 1.19

Southwest

N 101 97 99 103 103 102 102 101 102 100 103 78 80 102 102 Mean 1.04 1.10 1.17 1.23 1.37 1.24 1.36 1.19 1.31 1.43 1.29 1.37 1.40 1.38 1.35

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 16 07/29/2011

Page 69: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 340 333 325 343 342 341 341 341 338 333 333 235 241 344 340 Mean 1.13 1.18 1.21 1.44 1.63 1.45 1.55 1.40 1.51 1.65 1.51 1.59 1.62 1.56 1.62

ITSE Central

N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 6 5 3 3 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.00 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.17

Southwest

N 27 27 27 28 28 27 28 28 27 25 27 18 22 28 28 Mean 1.26 1.19 1.22 1.39 1.75 1.52 1.68 1.25 1.41 1.68 1.44 1.39 1.45 1.50 1.71

N 33 33 33 34 34 33 34 34 31 31 32 21 25 34 34 Mean 1.21 1.15 1.18 1.32 1.65 1.42 1.68 1.21 1.35 1.65 1.38 1.33 1.40 1.53 1.62

ITSY Central

N 11 11 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 8 8 12 12 Mean 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.58 1.67 1.42 1.58 1.25 1.42 1.73 1.64 1.50 1.38 1.42 1.83

Northwest

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.25 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.17 1.17 1.25 1.25

N 19 19 18 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 19 14 14 20 20 Mean 1.11 1.11 1.17 1.45 1.55 1.40 1.50 1.20 1.30 1.47 1.42 1.36 1.29 1.35 1.60

LBRA Southeast

N 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 3 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 3 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

LEAD Central

N 124 124 121 130 131 132 130 132 128 126 128 62 59 116 112 Mean 1.12 1.14 1.23 1.43 1.35 1.35 1.45 1.30 1.40 1.54 1.51 1.65 1.63 1.34 1.36

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 17 07/29/2011

Page 70: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

LEAD Northeast

N 52 47 47 52 52 51 51 52 52 51 52 29 29 52 50 Mean 1.06 1.13 1.30 1.33 1.31 1.39 1.45 1.17 1.25 1.80 1.44 1.69 1.83 1.13 1.36

Northwest

N 110 96 105 109 111 111 109 110 108 103 110 51 52 111 110 Mean 1.09 1.36 1.10 1.32 1.41 1.34 1.51 1.17 1.31 1.52 1.35 1.41 1.50 1.30 1.30

Southeast

N 26 26 24 26 26 26 26 26 25 25 25 9 7 24 24 Mean 1.08 1.12 1.33 1.23 1.27 1.27 1.23 1.12 1.48 1.60 1.32 1.67 1.86 1.25 1.29

Southwest

N 157 155 146 159 163 163 153 162 157 148 156 62 63 159 156 Mean 1.15 1.14 1.27 1.50 1.41 1.39 1.59 1.20 1.46 1.76 1.63 1.56 1.57 1.41 1.49

N 469 448 443 476 483 483 469 482 470 453 471 213 210 462 452 Mean 1.11 1.18 1.23 1.41 1.37 1.36 1.50 1.21 1.39 1.64 1.49 1.57 1.61 1.33 1.38

LGLA Central

N 240 230 205 240 244 239 234 244 234 232 238 88 85 244 244 Mean 1.03 1.07 1.12 1.34 1.37 1.33 1.44 1.31 1.34 1.50 1.39 1.53 1.54 1.43 1.43

N 240 230 205 240 244 239 234 244 234 232 238 88 85 244 244 Mean 1.03 1.07 1.12 1.34 1.37 1.33 1.44 1.31 1.34 1.50 1.39 1.53 1.54 1.43 1.43

LMGT Central

N 14 14 9 14 14 13 14 14 13 13 13 2 2 14 13 Mean 1.00 1.14 1.22 1.21 1.29 1.15 1.21 1.14 1.15 1.15 1.38 2.00 2.00 1.36 1.31

Southwest

N 21 20 17 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 20 4 5 21 21 Mean 1.19 2.20 1.41 1.76 1.67 1.62 1.95 1.52 1.67 1.86 1.60 1.75 2.20 1.71 1.86

N 35 34 26 35 35 34 35 35 34 34 33 6 7 35 34

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 18 07/29/2011

Page 71: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.11 1.76 1.35 1.54 1.51 1.44 1.66 1.37 1.47 1.59 1.52 1.83 2.14 1.57 1.65

MCHN Central

N 38 38 38 38 38 37 37 37 37 37 38 29 29 38 38 Mean 1.03 1.11 1.05 1.26 1.29 1.16 1.11 1.16 1.22 1.57 1.34 1.17 1.24 1.24 1.08

N 38 38 38 38 38 37 37 37 37 37 38 29 29 38 38 Mean 1.03 1.11 1.05 1.26 1.29 1.16 1.11 1.16 1.22 1.57 1.34 1.17 1.24 1.24 1.08

MDCA Coleman

N 153 151 151 152 153 151 153 152 149 149 153 119 120 153 153 Mean 1.24 1.13 1.29 1.50 1.71 1.53 1.65 1.49 1.51 2.28 1.59 1.38 1.46 1.57 1.65

Southwest

N 37 37 37 37 37 37 36 36 37 37 36 21 19 37 37 Mean 1.03 1.03 1.11 1.27 1.24 1.19 1.39 1.25 1.35 1.73 1.31 1.57 1.47 1.32 1.35

N 190 188 188 189 190 188 189 188 186 186 189 140 139 190 190 Mean 1.19 1.11 1.26 1.46 1.62 1.46 1.60 1.44 1.48 2.17 1.53 1.41 1.46 1.52 1.59

MLAB Coleman

N 157 154 155 159 159 158 158 159 159 156 157 156 155 159 158 Mean 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.25 1.28 1.28 1.42 1.26 1.30 1.35 1.32 1.22 1.24 1.28 1.27

N 157 154 155 159 159 158 158 159 159 156 157 156 155 159 158 Mean 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.25 1.28 1.28 1.42 1.26 1.30 1.35 1.32 1.22 1.24 1.28 1.27

MRKG Central

N 60 56 55 63 64 64 63 64 60 58 62 33 33 62 62 Mean 1.08 1.20 1.09 1.32 1.22 1.31 1.75 1.13 1.28 1.47 1.52 1.73 1.76 1.34 1.39

Northwest

N 12 12 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 8 8 12 12 Mean 1.08 1.08 1.30 1.25 1.42 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.33 1.25 1.75 1.75 1.42 1.42

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 19 07/29/2011

Page 72: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

MRKG Southwest

N 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 11 6 6 11 11 Mean 1.30 1.80 1.30 1.64 1.73 1.45 1.91 1.73 1.70 1.91 1.73 1.50 1.50 1.55 1.64

N 82 78 75 86 87 87 86 87 82 81 85 47 47 85 85 Mean 1.11 1.26 1.15 1.35 1.31 1.32 1.70 1.22 1.33 1.51 1.51 1.70 1.72 1.38 1.42

MRMT Southeast

N 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.25 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00

Southwest

N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 5 5 9 9 Mean 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.70 1.90 1.80 1.90 1.80 1.70 1.89 2.00 2.40 2.40 2.11 2.11

N 14 14 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 13 14 8 8 13 13 Mean 1.14 1.14 1.31 1.64 1.64 1.64 1.71 1.57 1.50 1.77 1.79 1.88 2.00 1.77 1.77

MSSG Coleman

N 27 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 26 26 27 27 Mean 1.11 1.08 1.15 1.22 1.26 1.22 1.52 1.22 1.30 1.93 1.26 1.15 1.12 1.11 1.11

N 27 26 26 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 26 26 27 27 Mean 1.11 1.08 1.15 1.22 1.26 1.22 1.52 1.22 1.30 1.93 1.26 1.15 1.12 1.11 1.11

MUSB Central

N 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 2 2 16 16 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.20 1.53 1.31 1.50 1.00 1.13 1.13

Northeast

N 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 9 8 9 3 3 10 10 Mean 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.40 1.40 1.56 1.38 1.44 1.67 1.67 1.30 1.40

Northwest

N 34 34 31 37 37 37 37 37 37 35 36 14 15 37 37

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 20 07/29/2011

Page 73: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.03 1.00 1.13 1.16 1.32 1.16 1.30 1.08 1.14 1.37 1.28 1.14 1.27 1.11 1.19

N 58 58 55 63 63 63 63 63 61 58 61 19 20 63 63 Mean 1.03 1.02 1.09 1.16 1.25 1.16 1.25 1.13 1.21 1.41 1.31 1.26 1.30 1.14 1.21

MUSC Central

N 38 37 38 39 39 38 38 39 38 38 38 24 24 39 38 Mean 1.08 1.19 1.24 1.26 1.38 1.45 1.63 1.38 1.55 1.66 1.84 1.46 1.42 1.49 1.53

Northeast

N 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 2 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.33 1.17 1.50 1.33 1.50 1.33 1.67 1.50 1.50 1.33 1.67

Northwest

N 281 242 265 282 288 285 279 287 278 268 281 228 244 288 282 Mean 1.06 1.19 1.12 1.23 1.30 1.23 1.41 1.24 1.36 1.45 1.47 1.27 1.30 1.34 1.37

Southeast

N 20 16 16 20 20 20 19 20 20 18 20 15 17 20 20 Mean 1.00 1.19 1.13 1.15 1.15 1.25 1.53 1.25 1.45 1.50 1.75 1.40 1.29 1.30 1.45

N 345 300 324 346 353 349 342 352 342 330 345 269 287 353 346 Mean 1.06 1.19 1.14 1.23 1.30 1.26 1.44 1.26 1.39 1.47 1.53 1.29 1.31 1.35 1.40

MUSP Northeast

N 8 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 7 7 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.33 1.44 1.33 1.44 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.29 1.14 1.33 1.33

Northwest

N 54 34 53 43 61 59 53 61 58 52 48 24 23 61 61 Mean 1.11 1.18 1.09 1.26 1.21 1.17 1.23 1.18 1.21 1.42 1.23 1.21 1.22 1.16 1.26

N 62 43 61 52 70 68 62 70 67 61 57 31 30 70 70 Mean 1.10 1.16 1.08 1.27 1.24 1.19 1.26 1.20 1.22 1.41 1.25 1.23 1.20 1.19 1.27

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 21 07/29/2011

Page 74: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

NMTT Coleman

N 70 67 68 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 68 69 68 69 69 Mean 1.16 1.27 1.13 1.44 1.65 1.48 1.72 1.46 1.48 1.56 1.59 1.35 1.40 1.42 1.55

N 70 67 68 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 68 69 68 69 69 Mean 1.16 1.27 1.13 1.44 1.65 1.48 1.72 1.46 1.48 1.56 1.59 1.35 1.40 1.42 1.55

OTHA Coleman

N 40 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 41 42 42 24 24 43 42 Mean 1.50 1.19 1.40 1.88 2.19 1.93 2.42 1.49 2.32 2.57 2.38 1.33 1.21 1.77 2.24

N 40 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 41 42 42 24 24 43 42 Mean 1.50 1.19 1.40 1.88 2.19 1.93 2.42 1.49 2.32 2.57 2.38 1.33 1.21 1.77 2.24

PHRA Coleman

N 197 197 197 200 199 199 199 197 198 198 198 188 188 197 199 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.11 1.44 1.62 1.43 1.50 1.40 1.37 1.76 1.47 1.31 1.35 1.46 1.60

N 197 197 197 200 199 199 199 197 198 198 198 188 188 197 199 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.11 1.44 1.62 1.43 1.50 1.40 1.37 1.76 1.47 1.31 1.35 1.46 1.60

PHTC Southwest

N 48 42 48 44 49 48 44 49 47 38 47 26 27 50 50 Mean 1.27 1.43 1.35 1.39 1.69 1.33 1.66 1.37 1.30 1.66 1.53 1.38 1.41 1.54 1.72

N 48 42 48 44 49 48 44 49 47 38 47 26 27 50 50 Mean 1.27 1.43 1.35 1.39 1.69 1.33 1.66 1.37 1.30 1.66 1.53 1.38 1.41 1.54 1.72

PLAB Coleman

N 16 16 15 16 15 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 15 Mean 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.06 1.13 1.13 1.25 3.67 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13

N 16 16 15 16 15 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 16 16 15 Mean 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.06 1.13 1.13 1.25 3.67 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 22 07/29/2011

Page 75: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

POFI Central

N 106 104 96 103 105 106 105 105 102 104 102 72 71 105 103 Mean 1.10 1.07 1.26 1.50 1.66 1.46 1.50 1.50 1.60 1.94 1.63 1.56 1.59 1.62 1.73

Northeast

N 46 45 42 47 47 46 47 48 46 47 48 28 29 47 46 Mean 1.37 1.18 1.55 1.64 1.79 1.61 1.74 1.54 1.65 2.09 1.92 1.75 1.86 1.79 1.93

Northwest

N 53 52 49 55 54 54 53 54 54 53 54 40 38 54 51 Mean 1.04 1.12 1.10 1.31 1.41 1.30 1.38 1.26 1.31 1.66 1.41 1.30 1.34 1.31 1.35

Southeast

N 70 68 64 68 70 68 69 70 69 66 70 41 41 68 69 Mean 1.03 1.07 1.34 1.35 1.43 1.26 1.39 1.34 1.45 1.80 1.39 1.44 1.41 1.43 1.42

Southwest

N 245 245 224 250 250 252 250 248 246 248 249 161 155 248 247 Mean 1.06 1.06 1.19 1.47 1.42 1.39 1.48 1.30 1.43 1.72 1.50 1.57 1.68 1.52 1.45

N 520 514 475 523 526 526 524 525 517 518 523 342 334 522 516 Mean 1.09 1.08 1.25 1.46 1.50 1.40 1.48 1.36 1.47 1.80 1.54 1.53 1.60 1.53 1.54

POFM Southeast

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Southwest

N 17 17 16 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 8 9 18 17 Mean 1.12 1.00 1.06 1.17 1.11 1.11 1.22 1.17 1.22 1.28 1.35 1.25 1.33 1.22 1.18

N 18 18 17 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 9 10 19 18 Mean 1.11 1.00 1.06 1.16 1.11 1.11 1.21 1.16 1.21 1.37 1.39 1.22 1.30 1.21 1.17

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 23 07/29/2011

Page 76: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

POFT Central

N 38 33 35 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 38 33 32 39 40 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.17 1.38 1.43 1.30 1.38 1.30 1.43 1.40 1.34 1.45 1.34 1.41 1.33

Northeast

N 20 19 19 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 14 15 21 21 Mean 1.20 1.11 1.32 1.62 1.71 1.43 1.52 1.43 1.71 2.14 1.76 1.57 1.87 1.62 1.67

Northwest

N 12 12 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 10 10 8 7 12 11 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.27 1.82 1.80 1.82 2.00 2.36 2.18 1.90 2.00 2.25 2.43 2.08 2.45

Southeast

N 42 39 38 41 42 40 40 43 40 40 39 20 19 41 41 Mean 1.10 1.33 1.24 1.37 1.17 1.30 1.40 1.16 1.33 1.73 1.41 1.40 1.53 1.24 1.24

Southwest

N 101 100 93 104 104 103 104 103 102 100 104 51 52 103 104 Mean 1.08 1.08 1.19 1.33 1.40 1.32 1.40 1.24 1.34 1.69 1.39 1.59 1.58 1.34 1.34

N 213 203 196 216 217 215 216 218 214 211 212 126 125 216 217 Mean 1.09 1.14 1.21 1.40 1.41 1.35 1.44 1.31 1.43 1.70 1.45 1.56 1.59 1.40 1.41

PSTR Central

N 199 191 185 168 201 196 178 201 198 163 170 193 189 201 200 Mean 1.03 1.04 1.06 1.30 1.22 1.15 1.21 1.16 1.24 1.37 1.24 1.19 1.13 1.17 1.17

N 199 191 185 168 201 196 178 201 198 163 170 193 189 201 200 Mean 1.03 1.04 1.06 1.30 1.22 1.15 1.21 1.16 1.24 1.37 1.24 1.19 1.13 1.17 1.17

PTAC Northeast

N 71 68 69 73 73 73 73 73 72 69 72 51 50 72 71 Mean 1.08 1.29 1.19 1.44 1.47 1.32 1.53 1.33 1.51 1.68 1.58 1.47 1.50 1.29 1.42

N 71 68 69 73 73 73 73 73 72 69 72 51 50 72 71

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 24 07/29/2011

Page 77: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.08 1.29 1.19 1.44 1.47 1.32 1.53 1.33 1.51 1.68 1.58 1.47 1.50 1.29 1.42

PTHA Coleman

N 223 201 217 220 225 223 222 224 220 213 221 209 207 223 221 Mean 1.06 1.08 1.10 1.59 1.69 1.56 1.72 1.67 1.60 1.85 1.58 1.54 1.53 1.57 1.68

N 223 201 217 220 225 223 222 224 220 213 221 209 207 223 221 Mean 1.06 1.08 1.10 1.59 1.69 1.56 1.72 1.67 1.60 1.85 1.58 1.54 1.53 1.57 1.68

PTRT Northeast

N 75 72 70 76 76 75 75 76 75 73 75 40 40 76 76 Mean 1.15 1.33 1.24 1.54 1.47 1.47 1.77 1.25 1.49 1.68 1.53 1.38 1.43 1.46 1.46

N 75 72 70 76 76 75 75 76 75 73 75 40 40 76 76 Mean 1.15 1.33 1.24 1.54 1.47 1.47 1.77 1.25 1.49 1.68 1.53 1.38 1.43 1.46 1.46

RADR Coleman

N 120 100 110 113 119 110 118 119 118 111 116 102 89 119 116 Mean 1.04 1.09 1.11 1.35 1.50 1.25 1.42 1.50 1.49 1.45 1.48 1.31 1.30 1.36 1.53

N 120 100 110 113 119 110 118 119 118 111 116 102 89 119 116 Mean 1.04 1.09 1.11 1.35 1.50 1.25 1.42 1.50 1.49 1.45 1.48 1.31 1.30 1.36 1.53

RELE Southeast

N 6 2 5 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 2 2 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Southwest

N 28 11 27 22 29 28 26 29 29 25 25 14 14 29 29 Mean 1.00 1.27 1.04 1.09 1.03 1.07 1.12 1.03 1.14 1.24 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.03

N 34 13 32 25 35 34 32 35 35 31 30 16 16 35 35 Mean 1.00 1.23 1.03 1.08 1.03 1.09 1.13 1.03 1.11 1.29 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.03

RNSG Coleman

N 614 593 576 595 619 596 595 618 606 570 588 475 460 612 612 Mean 1.32 1.25 1.37 1.93 1.92 1.82 2.26 1.70 1.89 2.08 2.01 1.72 1.83 1.73 1.95

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 25 07/29/2011

Page 78: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 614 593 576 595 619 596 595 618 606 570 588 475 460 612 612 Mean 1.32 1.25 1.37 1.93 1.92 1.82 2.26 1.70 1.89 2.08 2.01 1.72 1.83 1.73 1.95

RSPT Coleman

N 180 177 177 181 181 181 181 181 180 180 179 165 157 179 179 Mean 1.06 1.23 1.11 1.44 1.36 1.34 1.59 1.20 1.21 1.48 1.23 1.27 1.34 1.26 1.28

N 180 177 177 181 181 181 181 181 180 180 179 165 157 179 179 Mean 1.06 1.23 1.11 1.44 1.36 1.34 1.59 1.20 1.21 1.48 1.23 1.27 1.34 1.26 1.28

RSTO Central

N 101 99 92 100 101 102 101 102 99 95 100 53 52 102 101 Mean 1.11 1.30 1.25 1.66 1.80 1.73 1.69 1.51 1.69 1.76 1.63 1.51 1.58 1.75 1.81

N 101 99 92 100 101 102 101 102 99 95 100 53 52 102 101 Mean 1.11 1.30 1.25 1.66 1.80 1.73 1.69 1.51 1.69 1.76 1.63 1.51 1.58 1.75 1.81

RTVB Central

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 4 4 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.50 1.25 1.50 1.38 1.50 1.75 1.38 1.38 1.71 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.25 1.63

Northwest

N 187 169 177 185 191 188 185 191 188 185 182 155 154 190 188 Mean 1.05 1.17 1.09 1.24 1.29 1.22 1.40 1.30 1.35 1.46 1.42 1.37 1.33 1.25 1.27

Southeast

N 7 4 4 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 Mean 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.29 1.29 1.14 1.57 1.57 1.43 2.00 1.29 1.57 1.14 1.29 1.71

Southwest

N 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 16 17 17 15 15 17 16 Mean 1.00 1.24 1.00 1.29 1.12 1.06 1.47 1.18 1.38 1.59 1.41 1.27 1.27 1.24 1.25

N 219 198 206 217 223 220 217 223 219 215 214 181 180 222 219 Mean 1.05 1.19 1.09 1.25 1.28 1.22 1.42 1.30 1.36 1.50 1.43 1.38 1.33 1.25 1.30

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 26 07/29/2011

Page 79: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

SCIT Coleman

N 39 38 38 38 39 39 39 39 38 38 39 25 23 39 39 Mean 1.03 1.18 1.16 1.45 1.56 1.41 1.64 1.36 1.39 1.63 1.51 1.40 1.43 1.41 1.54

Northeast

N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.50 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.00 1.33 2.20 1.17 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.00

N 45 44 44 44 45 45 45 45 44 43 45 31 29 45 45 Mean 1.02 1.23 1.16 1.41 1.51 1.38 1.58 1.31 1.39 1.70 1.47 1.32 1.38 1.38 1.47

SLNG Central

N 125 125 124 127 127 128 123 128 120 126 127 35 38 128 128 Mean 1.10 1.23 1.08 1.37 1.48 1.40 1.67 1.51 1.48 1.74 1.65 1.63 1.63 1.43 1.61

N 125 125 124 127 127 128 123 128 120 126 127 35 38 128 128 Mean 1.10 1.23 1.08 1.37 1.48 1.40 1.67 1.51 1.48 1.74 1.65 1.63 1.63 1.43 1.61

SOLR Northeast

N 17 13 18 18 18 18 16 18 18 17 17 16 16 18 18 Mean 1.18 1.38 1.06 1.44 1.22 1.17 1.38 1.00 1.06 1.18 1.35 1.13 1.31 1.28 1.11

N 17 13 18 18 18 18 16 18 18 17 17 16 16 18 18 Mean 1.18 1.38 1.06 1.44 1.22 1.17 1.38 1.00 1.06 1.18 1.35 1.13 1.31 1.28 1.11

SRGT Coleman

N 123 117 117 123 123 121 122 123 122 117 119 103 104 122 122 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.22 1.64 1.67 1.54 1.86 1.65 1.61 2.07 2.03 1.47 1.58 1.51 1.68

N 123 117 117 123 123 121 122 123 122 117 119 103 104 122 122 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.22 1.64 1.67 1.54 1.86 1.65 1.61 2.07 2.03 1.47 1.58 1.51 1.68

TECM Central

N 10 9 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 4 4 10 10 Mean 1.10 1.00 1.38 1.30 1.50 1.10 1.20 1.10 1.30 1.30 1.20 1.50 1.50 1.20 1.30

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 27 07/29/2011

Page 80: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : SPRING 2011 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 10 9 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 4 4 10 10 Mean 1.10 1.00 1.38 1.30 1.50 1.10 1.20 1.10 1.30 1.30 1.20 1.50 1.50 1.20 1.30

TRVM Central

N 47 47 42 48 49 48 46 49 48 45 48 32 31 49 49 Mean 1.06 1.04 1.10 1.35 1.33 1.19 1.28 1.10 1.21 1.42 1.50 1.53 1.58 1.39 1.24

N 47 47 42 48 49 48 46 49 48 45 48 32 31 49 49 Mean 1.06 1.04 1.10 1.35 1.33 1.19 1.28 1.10 1.21 1.42 1.50 1.53 1.58 1.39 1.24

VNSG Central

N 147 143 136 150 148 149 149 151 149 142 150 81 80 150 147 Mean 1.06 1.08 1.20 1.55 1.82 1.52 1.75 1.49 1.66 1.68 1.75 1.77 1.79 1.59 1.70

Coleman

N 662 640 647 649 663 654 659 661 644 640 644 556 549 656 650 Mean 1.13 1.20 1.21 1.65 1.63 1.55 1.91 1.53 1.61 1.83 1.66 1.50 1.55 1.57 1.68

N 809 783 783 799 811 803 808 812 793 782 794 637 629 806 797 Mean 1.11 1.18 1.21 1.63 1.66 1.55 1.88 1.52 1.62 1.80 1.68 1.53 1.58 1.57 1.68

VTHT Northwest

N 131 130 130 137 137 138 138 138 137 133 135 105 103 138 137 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.05 1.23 1.22 1.20 1.34 1.14 1.27 1.34 1.23 1.17 1.19 1.24 1.16

N 131 130 130 137 137 138 138 138 137 133 135 105 103 138 137 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.05 1.23 1.22 1.20 1.34 1.14 1.27 1.34 1.23 1.17 1.19 1.24 1.16

WLDG Central

N 102 103 101 106 107 107 106 106 107 106 107 102 102 107 107 Mean 1.07 1.05 1.10 1.27 1.25 1.31 1.25 1.19 1.26 1.39 1.25 1.15 1.24 1.22 1.29

N 102 103 101 106 107 107 106 106 107 106 107 102 102 107 107 Mean 1.07 1.05 1.10 1.27 1.25 1.31 1.25 1.19 1.26 1.39 1.25 1.15 1.24 1.22 1.29

Houston Community College Office Of Institutional Research

FinalReport_Spring2011_WFED.pdf 28 07/29/2011

Page 81: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College SEOI – Instructor Office of Institutional Research Updated on: 1/06/03

INSTRUCTOR’S DIRECTIONS

Enclosed are two sets of forms. All students are requested to complete an SEOI Questionnaire. The Written Comments form is optional. Please do not staple the forms together. 1. Specify an individual and location for the student proctor to return completed surveys, usually a department or campus office. 2. Recruit a student proctor to conduct the survey. Review with the student proctor their directions as the proctor (see Student Proctor's Directions). 3. Give the survey packet to the student proctor. Inform the student proctor about the return

of the surveys (name of individual and location). In order to ensure proper handling of SEOI forms, be sure to give the student proctor the envelope in which the survey materials were received. This is the return envelope.

4. Write your name and the Class number (not the course number) on the blackboard.

Explain to your students that the purpose of this survey is to improve certain aspects of the course and to help you improve the way you teach. Please be sure to explain that the survey is anonymous. Under no circumstances will the instructor know the student’s identity. Introduce the student proctor to the class.

5. Leave the room and do not return until the students have completed and turned in their surveys to the student proctor. The proctor is responsible for turning the materials in. Please make sure the student proctor understands where to turn in the survey packet.

If you have any questions regarding these directions please call 713-718-6259

Page 82: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College SEOI – Proctor Office of Institutional Research Updated on: 1/06/03

STUDENT PROCTOR’S DIRECTIONS

Enclosed are two sets of forms. All students are requested to complete an SEOI Questionnaire. The Written Comments form is optional. Please do not staple the forms together. 1. Make sure that the Class number that the instructor wrote on the board matches the class

number on the survey packet. After the instructor has left the room, pass out both sheets of the Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) survey. Keep any extra forms in your possession.

2. Read “Statement of Intent” to the students:

This survey instrument has been designed to identify strengths and weaknesses of your instructor and your perceptions of the effectiveness of the class instruction. Please give us your serious and fair evaluation of both your and class instruction.

3. Read the following instructions to the students:

• Use only a #2 pencil or a blue or black ink pen. • Write the instructor’s name and bubble in the Class number in the upper

right corner of the Questionnaire and the Written Comments sheet, if used. (Check to see that this is being done properly.)

• Fill out the Questionnaire independently, without consultation with other students. • Do not sign your name or leave any marks of identification on the answer sheet. • If this is a lecture class, you do not need to complete Section III. If this is a lab, clinical, workshop or practicum class complete all sections. • Written comments are optional but very much encouraged.

4. When students have completed the survey, collect the forms, place them face up in the

same direction, and place both completed and unused forms into the original envelope and close it.

5. Return the envelope (containing all forms) to the location and individual specified by

your instructor. (This is most likely the department or campus secretary) Do not return the forms to the instructor.

Page 83: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

CLASSNUMBER

Instructor's Name:

This survey instrument has been designed to identify strengths and weaknesses of your

instructor and your perceptions of the effectiveness of the class instruction.

Please give us your serious and fair evaluation of both your instructor and class instruction.

Statement of Intent:

MARKING INSTRUCTIONS

Part I. Evaluation of Instruction[To be completed by all students.]

The course requirements in the syllabus were clearly stated.The textbook used for this course is suitable.Other instructional materials (tapes, handouts, web sites, etc.) used in this course enhanced my learning of the subject matter.

1.2.3.

` ` ` `

` ` ` `

` ` ` `

Yes Neutral NoNo Basis forJudgement

OFFICE USE ONLY: ````````````

Use a No. 2 pencil or a blue or black ink pen only.

Erase cleanly any answer you wish to change.

Part II. Evaluation of Instructor[To be completed by all students.]

The instructor asks test questions that deal with material that is covered in the course.The instructor communicates clearly.The assignments were relevant to the course.My grades are an indication of my learning.The instructor treats students with respect.

4.

5.6.7.8.

CORRECT: ~

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

The instructor is available for student consultation.The instructor grades impartially.The instructor gives me timely feedback on graded work.

9.10.11.

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

Part III. Lab Evaluation [To be completed by students enrolled in a laboratory or clinical class.]

The instructor explains appropriate safety procedures for this laboratory/clinical.The instructor links the laboratory exercises to lecture.

12.

13.` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

Part IV. Overall Evaluation[To be completed by all students.]

The instructor encourages me to become actively engaged in the learning process.I would recommend this instructor to other students.

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

Part V. Library Resources[To be completed by all students.]

` ` `` ` `

` ` `` ` `

14.

15.

The HCCS library resources were adequate for the needs of this course.If provided, the library instruction received for this course was adequate.

LR1.

LR2.

DRC ScanDocs™ 9076-54321

Neutral DisagreeNo Basis forJudgementAgree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Neutral DisagreeNo Basis forJudgementAgree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Neutral DisagreeNo Basis forJudgementAgree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Neutral DisagreeNo Basis forJudgementAgree

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)

Houston Community CollegeOffice of Institutional Research

Page 84: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

INFORMATION SHEET - STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION (SEOI) PROGRAM

• TOTAL - The "TOTAL " row shown reflects the total number of students in a specific course who responded to each item. The numbers underneath "TOTAL" correspond to the items on the

HOW TO READ THE INDIVIDUAL INSTRUCTOR REPORT

Your individual evaluation report contains the following information: • Name, Class Number (CRN), Course Title, Course Number • Question identification numbers (Q01 – Q15) appear across the top of the evaluation report. The

numbers correspond with the items on the standard questionnaire forms.

answer scale for the standard questionnaire.

Values for the answer scale to Questions 01-03:

1 = YES 2 = NEUTRAL 3 = NO 4 = NO BASIS FOR JUDGMENT

Values for the answer scale to Questions 04-15

:

1 = STRONGLY AGREE 2 = AGREE 3 = NEUTRAL 4 = DISAGREE 5 = STRONGLY DISAGREE 6 = NO BASIS FOR JUDGMENT

• MEAN - Averaged scores for each questionnaire item per individual class. At the bottom of the last page for each report, you will find cumulative statistics which provide the following information: • TOT. FREQ (total frequency) - Indicates the cumulative sum of students from your combined classes who

responded to each item. • TOTAL MEAN - Indicates combined mean scores for each questionnaire item for all your classes. • SYST MEAN – Indicates the combined mean scores on each questionnaire item for your discipline across the

entire college system. NOTE: If you taught more than one course during the semester, the data for those courses appear on the printout under the respective course numbers. Now, turn to the other side of this sheet for an illustration of how to read your report.

Page 85: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531751.pdfSpring 2011 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM STUDENT EVALUATION REPORT - BY INSTRUCTOR

NAME CRN

MEAN 1.87 1.12 1.25 1.25 1.12 0 0 0

Q01 Q02 Q03 Q4 ……. Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 DOE, J. M. 54321 ABCD 2301 TOTAL 8 8 8 8 ……. 8 0 0 0 1 3 7 7 3 7 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

TOT. FREQ 8 8 8 8 ……. 8 0 0 0 1 3 7 7 3 7 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 TOTAL MEAN 1.87 1.12 1.12 1.87 ……. 1.12 0 0 0 SYST MEAN 1.85 1.20 1.19 1.85 1.17 0 0 0

FOR QUESTIONS 01 - 03: Look at the TOTAL Now look under the column Q01: • Eight students responded to questionnaire item

one. • Three students answered "Yes" to Question 1. • Three students answered "Neutral" to Question 1. • Two students answered "No" to Question 1. • None of the students answered "No Basis for

Judgement" to Question 1. There are four possible answers to Q1-Q3, but if a field is not populated, it does not appear on the report.

FOR QUESTIONS 04 - 15: Look at the TOTAL.

Now look under the column Q04: • Eight students responded to questionnaire item

four. • Three students answered "Strongly Agree" to

Question 4. • Three students answered "Agree" to Question 4. • Two students answered "Neutral" to Question 4 • None of the students answered "Disagree",

"Strongly Disagree", or "No Basis for Judgement" to Question 4. There are six possible answers to Q4-Q15, but if a field is not populated, it does not appear on the report.

Look at the TOT. FREQ row that (number of responses). Now look under column Q01: • The total number of responses for all classes taught by the instructor is eight. In the example, the number for the

cumulative statistic is the same because the instructor only taught one class. For an instructor who taught more than one class, the cumulative statistics would reflect the total responses received from all students taught during the semester.

The System mean is the cumulative average for all instructors from the appropriate teaching area who participated in the program during the semester. These figures provide comparative performance information.