results sectiondraftshm dec27

Upload: zine

Post on 06-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    1/12

    1 Results

    1.1 Demographic Characteristics

    Table 1: Age of Children under 2 (n=358)

    Age of children (n=300) Freq %

    0 to 5 months 107 30

    6 to 11 months 95 27

    12 to 23 months 156 43

    Total 358 100.0

    Table 2: Sex of Children under 2 (n=358)

    Sex of children (n=358) Freq %

    Female 137 45.7

    Male 163 54.3

    Total 358 100.0

    1.2 Maternal and newborn care:

    Table 5: Health Center/Home Delivery

    Freq %

    Health Center 213 59,7

    Home 144 40,3

    Total 357 100,0

    60% of deliveries take place in the Health centers. It is twice the baseline line (29%). Whilethere has been modest increase in the extension of Health facility coverage between 2007 (52

    Health post) and 2011 (60 Health post) in the Konni District in general. In the surveyed 60villages, the number of HP and Primary Health Care ( CSI) Centers has even remained

    unchanged. Improved Health care delivery and Community Mobilization in project area may

    have contributed .

    Table 6: Assistance during the Delivery (n=358)

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    2/12

    *within this group, 4 responses were categorized as auxiliaire and the cross check

    on where this staff exist shows that they are in Health Centers. This could be relatedto Health post workers ( HPw) who temporarily work in Integrated Health Centers (

    CSI) during the Frequent absence of the Chief CSI nurse in the majority of Healthcenters staffed by only one or 2 nurses.

    The Catch indicator includes Health post worker as qualified Personnel since they

    were trained by Project in Clean Delivery. Some of this HPW are nurses but may notbe known as such by respondents.

    There almost 40% of delivery still attended by TBA (Matrons) even though they are

    not considered as skilled personnel. The project has devoted considerable time in the

    sensitization to teach to TBA in their new role of companion to delivery .

    Table 6: Home delivery By TBA

    HomedeliveryTBA Frequency Percent Cum PercentYes 67 47,2% 47,2%

    No 75 52,8% 100,0%Total 142 100,0% 100,0%

    95% Conf Limits

    Yes 38,8% 55,7%

    No 44,3% 61,2%

    Comments:

    when we cross where do the Birth assisted by matrons took, we find that only half ofthem were at Home, 50% of these Births assisted by TBA( 75/142) occurred inHealth Centers. This is well know practices particularly in CSI and District Hospital

    where matrons are still used for night shift under Midwife supervision. Officiallymatrons are expected even in those centers to accompany Parturient to Maternity and

    help the women in post partum wards. But the reality is that matrons continue to assistdelivery when the Midwife actually went to rest during night guards.

    Person who assisted Freq %

    Doctor/ Nurse/Midwife 161 45

    HP worker 28 8

    Traditional birth attendant 140 40

    Other 25*

    Not assisted 2

    Total 358 100.0

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    3/12

    Table 7 : Use of Clean delivery Kits (n=358)

    76% of the deliveries benefited clean delivery kit. Project has provided a single usedelivery Kit in health centers. The Kit comprises a 2 Yards Cloth to wrap the baby, a

    razor blade for Cordon Section, a gloves and a soap. While 60% of the deliveryoccurred in health centers, approximately 16% of Kit used were either at home or

    elsewhere. This is a significant increase compared to 21% of Kit delivery use for at

    21%.

    Table 8: Post Natal check for Mother with first week

    Q27 Frequency Percent Cum Percent

    Heure1 159 79,1% 79,1%

    jour1 19 9,5% 88,6%

    NSP1 20 10,0% 98,5%Semaine1 3 1,5% 100,0%

    Total 201 100,0% 100,0%

    95% Conf Limits

    Heure172,8

    %84,5%

    jour1 5,8% 14,4%

    NSP1 6,2% 14,9%

    Semaine1 0,3% 4,3%

    Was a Clean Delivery Kit

    used during delivery?

    Freq %

    Yes 272 76

    No 84

    Do Not Know 2 1

    Total 358 100.0

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    4/12

    88% (178/201) of mothers who delivered had a post natal check with the first week and 80%

    of them had the week within the first day after delivery. The total number of the respondantsmatches with 213 who delivered in Health Center.

    Only 29 mothers were able to identify the Health personnel who performed the Check. Half ofthem ( 51%) were done by Health post Worker. 4 checks done by midwifes and 2 by Doctors.

    It appears clearly that Doctor and Midwife are most recognizable or may be more

    communicative (?) Than Nurses and Health Post worker, since the number of deliveriesassisted by Midwife and Doctors are the same for the post natal checks.

    Table 9: Post Natal Check for New born

    Freq Percent

    Yes 34 54,0%

    No 29 46,0%

    Total 63 100,0%

    36% (63/216) of mothers said that their baby was checked by the health personnel of thefacility where they delivered but only half of the Newborn (38) were checked within the week

    after birth.

    Breastfeeding

    Table10: Time of Breastfeeding after Birth (n=300)

    94% of the newborn were breastfed Immediately ( with 1 hour) and same proportionwere given colustrum during the first 3 days after birth and 84% of the new were not

    given any other feed during the same period. This is twice (42%) higher than baselinerates.

    Table11: Exclusive Breafeeding/ breastmilk and simple water (n= 107) pending

    analysis

    Time Freq %

    Within 1 hour (Initiation ) 339 94%

    After 1 hour 13 62.0

    Did not Know 6 2.7

    Total 358 100.0

    Type of feeding Freq %

    EBF

    Total 107 100.0

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    5/12

    Vitamin A Supplementation

    Table 12 : Children who received Vit A (n=251)

    74% of children aged 5-23month received at least once a dose of Vitamin A.

    Vaccination:

    Table 13: Health Card/vaccination possessionDo you have a card where your childs

    vaccinations are written down?Freq %

    Valide Yes,seen by theSurveyor

    273 76,3

    Do not Know 1 ,3

    Not availalbe 68 19,0

    Never had a Card 16 4,5

    Total 358 100,0

    73% of mothers possess Health or vaccination cards. Baseline line value is 61%. The major

    issue with Health/vaccination card is that they are not filled mostly by Health personnel.

    72% (258/358) of mother mentioned to have received vaccination that is not written in thebook.

    Tab 13: BCGFreq %

    Valide 89 24,9

    NON 32 8,9

    NSP 1 ,3

    Received Vit A (at least once) Freq %Yes 184 74

    No 62

    Did not know 4 1

    Blank 1 0

    Total 251 100.0

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    6/12

    OUI 236 65,9

    Total 358 100,0

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    7/12

    Detailed annexe: Q15-Q16

    Q15:Did you ever breastfeed your child?

    Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

    validePourcentage

    cumul

    Valide NON 4 1,1 1,1 1,1

    OUI 354 98,9 98,9 100,0

    Total 358 100,0 100,0

    Q16:How long after birth did you first put your child to the breast?

    Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

    validePourcentage

    cumul

    Valide HEURE 80 22,3 22,3 22,3

    IMMEDIATEMENT 259 72,3 72,3 94,7

    JOURS 13 3,6 3,6 98,3

    NSP 6 1,7 1,7 100,0

    Total 358 100,0 100,0

    Q17:During the first three or four days after delivery, before your regular milk began flowing, did you give your

    child the liquid (colostrum) that came from your breast?

    Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

    validePourcentage

    cumul

    Valide NON 18 5,0 5,0 5,0

    OUI 340 95,0 95,0 100,0

    Total 358 100,0 100,0

    Q18: In the first three days after delivery, was your child given anything to drink other than breast milk?

    Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

    validePourcentage

    cumul

    Valide NON 302 84,4 84,4 84,4

    OUI 56 15,6 15,6 100,0

    Total 358 100,0 100,0

    Q16:How long after birth did you first put your child to the breast?

    Effectifs PourcentagePourcentage

    validePourcentage

    cumul

    Valide HEURE 80 22,3 22,3 22,3

    IMMEDIATEMENT 259 72,3 72,3 94,7JOURS 13 3,6 3,6 98,3

    NSP 6 1,7 1,7 100,0

    Total 358 100,0 100,0

    Q44:

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    8/12

    tr_age Effec

    tifs

    Pourcen

    tage

    Pourcent

    age

    valide

    Pourcent

    age

    cumul

    1 Valide NON 25 23,4 23,4 23,4

    OUI 82 76,6 76,6 100,0

    Total 107 100,0 100,0

    2 Valide NON 63 25,1 25,1 25,1

    NSP 4 1,6 1,6 26,7

    OUI 184 73,3 73,3 100,0

    Total 251 100,0 100,0

    Forward

    VITAMINEA Frequency Percent Cum Percent

    40241 1 3,6% 3,6%

    40387 1 3,6% 7,1%

    40494 1 3,6% 10,7%

    40538 1 3,6% 14,3%

    40559 1 3,6% 17,9%

    40570 1 3,6% 21,4%

    40596 1 3,6% 25,0%

    40608 1 3,6% 28,6%

    40617 1 3,6% 32,1%

    40624 1 3,6% 35,7%

    40628 1 3,6% 39,3%

    40647 1 3,6% 42,9%

    40659 1 3,6% 46,4%

    40663 2 7,1% 53,6%

    40681 1 3,6% 57,1%

    40697 1 3,6% 60,7%

    40717 1 3,6% 64,3%

    40718 1 3,6% 67,9%

    40721 1 3,6% 71,4%

    40756 1 3,6% 75,0%

    40768 1 3,6% 78,6%

    40779 1 3,6% 82,1%

    40783 1 3,6% 85,7%

    47484 3 10,7% 96,4%

    146099 1 3,6% 100,0%

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    9/12

    Total 28 100,0% 100,0%

    95% Conf Limits

    40241 0,1% 18,3%

    40387 0,1% 18,3%40494 0,1% 18,3%

    40538 0,1% 18,3%

    40559 0,1% 18,3%

    40570 0,1% 18,3%

    40596 0,1% 18,3%

    40608 0,1% 18,3%

    40617 0,1% 18,3%

    40624 0,1% 18,3%

    40628 0,1% 18,3%

    40647 0,1% 18,3%

    40659 0,1% 18,3%

    40663 0,9% 23,5%

    40681 0,1% 18,3%

    40697 0,1% 18,3%

    40717 0,1% 18,3%

    40718 0,1% 18,3%

    40721 0,1% 18,3%

    40756 0,1% 18,3%

    40768 0,1% 18,3%40779 0,1% 18,3%

    40783 0,1% 18,3%

    47484 2,3% 28,2%

    146099 0,1% 18,3%

    Previous Dataset Results Library

    1.1.1.1FREQ Q44

    Next Procedure

    Forward

    Q44 Frequency Percent Cum Percent

    NON 62 24,8% 24,8%

    NSP 4 1,6% 26,4%

    OUI 184 73,6% 100,0%

    Total 250 100,0% 100,0%

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    10/12

    95% Conf Limits

    NON 19,6% 30,6%

    NSP 0,4% 4,0%

    OUI 67,7% 79,0%

    Previous Dataset Results Library

    1.1.1.2TABLES VITAMINEA Q44

    Next Procedure

    Forward

    Q44

    VITAMINEA NON OUI TOTAL

    40241Row %

    Col %

    00,0

    0,0

    1100,0

    3,8

    1100,0

    3,6

    40387

    Row %Col %

    0

    0,00,0

    1

    100,03,8

    1

    100,03,6

    40494

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40538

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40559Row %

    Col %

    00,0

    0,0

    1100,0

    3,8

    1100,0

    3,6

    40570

    Row %Col %

    0

    0,00,0

    1

    100,03,8

    1

    100,03,6

    40596

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40608Row %

    Col %

    1100,0

    50,0

    00,0

    0,0

    1100,0

    3,6

    40617

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40624

    Row %

    0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    1

    100,0

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    11/12

    Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6

    40628Row %

    Col %

    00,0

    0,0

    1100,0

    3,8

    1100,0

    3,6

    40647

    Row %Col %

    0

    0,00,0

    1

    100,03,8

    1

    100,03,6

    40659

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40663

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    2

    100,0

    7,7

    2

    100,0

    7,1

    40681Row %

    Col %

    00,0

    0,0

    1100,0

    3,8

    1100,0

    3,6

    40697

    Row %Col %

    0

    0,00,0

    1

    100,03,8

    1

    100,03,6

    40717

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40718

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40721Row %

    Col %

    1100,0

    50,0

    00,0

    0,0

    1100,0

    3,6

    40756

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40768

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40779

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    3,8

    1

    100,0

    3,6

    40783Row %

    Col %

    00,0

    0,0

    1100,0

    3,8

    1100,0

    3,6

    47484

    Row %

    Col %

    0

    0,0

    0,0

    3

    100,0

    11,5

    3

    100,0

    10,7

    146099

    Row %

    0

    0,0

    1

    100,0

    1

    100,0

  • 8/3/2019 Results SectiondraftsHM Dec27

    12/12

    1.1.1.3Single Table Analysis

    Chi-

    squaredf Probability

    28,0000 24 0,2600

    An expected value is < 5.

    Chi-square not valid.

    Tab: Exclusive

    Breastfeeding

    Exclusive Breasfeedingbf

    Total1 2 3 4 5

    tr_age 1 Effectif 92 0 9 6 0 107

    % comprisdanstr_age

    86,0% ,0% 8,4% 5,6% ,0% 100,0%

    % comprisdans bf

    29,5% ,0% 34,6% 40,0% ,0% 29,9%

    % du total 25,7% ,0% 2,5% 1,7% ,0% 29,9%

    2 Effectif 220 3 17 9 2 251

    % comprisdanstr_age

    87,6% 1,2% 6,8% 3,6% ,8% 100,0%

    % comprisdans bf

    70,5% 100,0% 65,4% 60,0% 100,0% 70,1%

    % du total 61,5% ,8% 4,7% 2,5% ,6% 70,1%

    Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6

    TOTALRow %

    Col %

    27,1

    100,0

    2692,9

    100,0

    28100,0

    100,0