resurrecting the role of the product market wedge - mark ...discussion dynamics of output and in...
TRANSCRIPT
Resurrecting the Role of the Product Market WedgeMark Bils, Peter Klenow, Benjamin Malin
Discussant: Raphael Schoenle, Brandeis University
FRBSF Conference on Macroeconomics and Monetary Policy
March 4, 2016
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 1 / 24
Overview
An excellent + really important paper.Why?
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 2 / 24
Overview
The effect of shocks depends on the frictions in the economy:
Shockstransmission−−−−−−−→frictions
real variables
Wedges:
quantify the “extent of our ignorance” in a given optimizingframework
guide our modeling efforts about these frictions
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 3 / 24
Overview
Among possible wedges, the labor wedge, is important:
RAWt = MPN −MRS
= MPN −W /P − (MRS −W /P)
= µP + µL
� 0
Conventionally, attributed to “labor market wedge,” or “wage markups”(Gali et al. 2007, Chari et al. 2007, Shimer 2009, Karabarbounis 2014)
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 4 / 24
Overview
BKM (2015):Better Measurement: Self-employed, intermediate input share
⇒ The Return of the Product Market Wedge (PMW)
“Labor Wedge”↗ ↖
50% Labor Market Wedge 50% Product Market Wedge
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 5 / 24
Overview
Product market frictions matter for business cycle.
A call to arms!Study not only labor market but pricing frictions.
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 6 / 24
Discussion
No major criticism - three comments:
1 Are wages allocative?
2 Evidence for importance of product market wedge
3 A few product market frictions
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 7 / 24
Discussion
1. Are wages allocative?Careful & clever work by the authors.
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 8 / 24
Discussion
Are wages allocative?
AHE not the marginal cost of labor.
Alternative measures: NH, UCL (Kudlyak 2014).
BKM convincingly focus on self-employed:
Absence of labor market frictions: µLt = 0
Labor wedge RAWt only measures µPt .
Since MRS = W /P, µPt = log(MPNt)− log(MRS)t . No wages.
Potential issue: Labor market frictions for the unemployed. Are wagesof self-employed allocative? Lumpiness of contracts: choose hours?
Not in aggregate hours.
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 9 / 24
Discussion
Are wages allocative?
Self-employed hours:
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 10 / 24
Discussion
Are wages allocative? An observation
Results on labor wedge conditional on labor market policy.Germany during the Euro Crisis: “Short-Term Work.”
Little distortion in consumption-leisure choice.Implies bigger statistical role for product market wedge but labormarket friction unimportant?
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 11 / 24
Discussion
2. Evidence for importance of product market wedgeRelated work consistent with countercyclical PMW.
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 12 / 24
Discussion
Evidence for importance of PMW:
Gali et al. (2007): robustness check, “Bils Adjustment,” allows fordifference of marginal and average wage & finds about 1/3 of laborwedge due to PMW (correlation with wedge: 0.45; ≈ 0 in baseline)
Basu and House (2015): estimate New-Keynesian DSGE model usingNH and UCL wage measures, conclude “price rigidity likely plays asubstantially more important role than wage rigidity in governingeconomic fluctuations.”
Bhattarai, Eggertsson and Schoenle (2013): estimateGali-Smets-Wouters with identified wage markup shocks. Effect ofincreased price/wage flexibility: Increase in output volatility is due toprice markup shocks, not wage markup shocks or labor supply shocks.Suggests importance of product market frictions.
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 13 / 24
Discussion
Evidence from financial crisis consistent with a countercyclical PMW:
Despite massive economic slack muted producer price dynamics.
Based on Gilchrist et al. (2014), Gilchrist et al. (2015) and Gilchristand Zakrajsek (2015) at Jackson Hole.
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 14 / 24
Discussion
Dynamics of output and inflation in the U.S.:
Exhibit 1: Introduction
• What accounts for the resilience of inflation in the face of significant and long-lasting economic slack?
•
The question
In particular, the absence of more substantial deflationary pressures during the "Great Recession" isdifficult to square with the Phillips curve common to most macroeconomic models.
Cyclical Dynamics of Producer Prices and Industrial Production
-24 -16 -8 0 8 16 24-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5Percentage points
Peak: Jan1980Peak: Jul1981Peak: Jul1990Peak: Mar2001Peak: Dec2007
Months to and from business cycle peaks
Core producer prices*
* Deviations from a linear trend estimated over the 24 monthspreceding the specified recession.
-24 -16 -8 0 8 16 24-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5Percentage points
Peak: Jan1980Peak: Jul1981Peak: Jul1990Peak: Mar2001Peak: Dec2007
Months to and from business cycle peaks
Industrial production*
* Deviations from a linear trend estimated over the 24 monthspreceding the specified recession.
• Economic forces that dampen the response of inflation to adverse demand or financial shocks reflect
-
-
Our answer
the interaction between customer markets and financial frictions:
Customer markets: markets in which customer base is "sticky" and an important determinant offirm’s assets and firm’s ability to generate profits
Financial frictions: systematic countercyclical wedge between the cost of external and internalfinance due to asymmetric information or moral hazard problems in financial markets
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 15 / 24
Discussion
Relatively mild disinflation in Eurozone since 2008:
1992–2008 2009–2014
Core GIIPS Core GIIPS
Avg. inflation (%) 1.58 3.34 1.22 0.66Avg. output gap (%) 0.32 0.81 −1.38 −4.48
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 16 / 24
Discussion
Countercyclical price markups in Eurozone periphery:
Price markups ∼ 1/labor share (Gali et al. 2007, Karabarbounis2014).
Eurozone 2005-2014:
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 17 / 24
Discussion
3. A call to arms ... next step: which pricing frictions?
Bring IO into macro.
Two candidates:
Financial frictions/customer markets.
Interactions of heterogeneous frictions with heterogeneous pricingfrictions.
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 18 / 24
Discussion
Financial frictions in customer markets
Gilchrist el al. (2014), Chevalier and Scharfstein (1996), Bils (1989)
Empirical evidence from matched Compustat firms to PPI data:
Financially weak (strong) firms increase (lower) prices during2008-2009 financial crisis
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012-6
-4
-2
0
2
4Percentage points
Low liquidity firmsHigh liquidity firms
3-month moving average
Similar finding for Euro zone financial frictions and Phillips curveresiduals (Gilchrist et al. 2015), also de Almeida (2015)
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 19 / 24
Discussion
Model generates countercyclical price markups
Labor wedge following financial shock:
real mechanism reinforces labor wedgelarge effect
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 20 / 24
Discussion
Heterogeneity:“. . . it is conceivable that the assumption of a representative householdand a representative firm neglects an important role for microeconomicheterogeneity. . . Although it is possible that some other non -representative agent model will deliver a countercyclical labor wedge, thisapproach currently does not seem promising.” (Shimer 2009)
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 21 / 24
Discussion
Interactions of heterogeneous frictions with heterogeneous pricingfrictions
Pasten, Schoenle, Weber (2015):
DSGE model with heterogeneity in price stickiness, interacted withheterogeneous I/O linkages and consumption weights“Acemoglu x Gabaix x NK model”
Interaction implies potentially massive amplification of shocks:
Sectoral price stickiness x sectoral connectedness x sectoral size
Calibration to U.S. micro data following monetary shock:Not so much I/O structure, but underlying heterogeneity in pricestickiness generates countercyclical product market wedge
Ongoing work for idiosyncratic shocks
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 22 / 24
Discussion
Representative vs. heterogeneous firm labor wedge
Period0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Perc
enta
ge
Devia
tion
from
SS
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5Markups, Case 2
1st Percentile5th Percentile25th PercentileMedian75th Percentile95th Percentile99th Percentile
Period0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Perc
enta
ge
Devia
tion
from
SS
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12Markups, Case 6
1st Percentile5th Percentile25th PercentileMedian75th Percentile95th Percentile99th Percentile
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 23 / 24
Discussion
Summary:
Very excited about BKM (2015). Super important paper
Will lead to lots of future work
Raphael Schoenle (Brandeis) Resurrecting the PMW March 4, 2016 24 / 24