€¦ · resutts of the ti{teri{ationai, trials witii stinflowbr cui,.tivars (the fif"th cycte...

11
RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har- vested. The recomrnended population under dry land conditions was 40,000 plants pe! heLtare, with variations concerning the local conditions up to 55,000 plants per hectare (under irrigaiion for instance). The other cul- iural practices were adapted to the local con- ditions. Certain trials were conducted under irrigation, but most of them in dry land. TÏe parti,clpants have adopted more or less thé same 'experimental technique, which has facilitated thè statistical interpr'etation of data. They sent field books of a F.A.O. type or ela- borated papers to Fundulea Liaison centre. The analysis - of variance was calculated for seed yie1d, oil content and oi1 fatty acids compo- sition. The reaction to diseases and unfavourable environmental conditions was estimated only in the field. The response to broomrape attack (Orobanche cl-Lrnana Wallr.) was Ïrowever eva- iuated both under controlled and natural in- festations, in three locations. Self-fertility degree was determirned at Novi Sad in 1985, as the ratio betw'een the mean number of filled seeds on the bagged heads and the me'an numben of filled ,seeds on the open pollinated heads, multiplied by- 100. - In Jome cases, 'incomplete or unreliable data were 'obtained, 'due to either unfavourable 'c1i- matic conditions or to certain accidental causes. Such data were not included in this paper. No results were received from B' ]oca- iions (Pisa Italy, ,sindos - Ç1ssce, J(aradj '- Iran, Be'it-Dagan - Israel, Islamabad - Pakistan, Cochabamba - Bolivia and La Pla- tina - Chile). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION As in the previous experimental cy'cles, the results obtained in the last biennial trial dis- piayed a large diversity of the response of sunÎlower génotypes to the environrnental variations. Certain hybrids exhibited however a relative constant good behaviour from lôca- tion to location and'from year to year. Authors.' see Annex 1. Data procèssing and interpretation: Liais^on Centre of Funihilea, P.omc-nia (A. V. VRÂNCEANU' Fl. M. STOENESCU ond GABRIELA SOARE) INTRODUCTION One of the most ,active and fruitful sub-' nietworks of the F.A.O. Research Network qn Sunflower has been the s-ubnetwork on the experimentation of sunflower hybrid cul: tivàrs in international trials. It started'this activitv in 19?6 and has already completed ten yéars of joint investigations divided in five biennial cycles. The results of the previous four cycles were published in the Scientific Bulletins lel,la, iVumbers 7/1978, 2/1979, 3/1980, 5/1982 and 7/1984. ': This paper presents the results of the fifth bienniàf ôycle 1984-1985 obtained by 2? governmenial research institutions from 19 éountries of Europe, North, Centr:al and South America, Asia and Africa. ' ,The names of the participants belonging to these institutions and who condu'cted the co-operative trials are listed in Annex 1. MATERIALS AND METHODS The hybrid genotypes under testing, listed in Annex 2, originate from the most impor- tant ,sunflower breeding centres of Europe and North and South America and they repre- sent the rnost recent achievements in this field. The investigated set of genotypes was mad,e up of 30 singie rtrybri:ds, 3 three-way hybrids and one open pollinated variety. Th" Argentine hybrids did not enter all trials due 1o -the delay in shipping the seed samples by the respective supplying'centres.' The trial instructions were improved in view of the simplification of data collection and interpretation. T,he experimental design was the randomi- zed blocki with 5 replications. Entry rando- mization for each location was established differently by each participating institution. 1.!he plot size was s'o 'estabilished that after 'discaiding the borders (the two margi- nal rows and two frontal plants in each row),

Upload: others

Post on 30-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALSWITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS

(THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985)

a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population underdry land conditions was 40,000 plants pe!heLtare, with variations concerning the localconditions up to 55,000 plants per hectare(under irrigaiion for instance). The other cul-iural practices were adapted to the local con-ditions. Certain trials were conducted underirrigation, but most of them in dry land.

TÏe parti,clpants have adopted more or lessthé same 'experimental technique, which hasfacilitated thè statistical interpr'etation of data.They sent field books of a F.A.O. type or ela-borated papers to Fundulea Liaison centre. Theanalysis

- of variance was calculated for seedyie1d, oil content and oi1 fatty acids compo-sition.

The reaction to diseases and unfavourableenvironmental conditions was estimated only inthe field. The response to broomrape attack(Orobanche cl-Lrnana Wallr.) was Ïrowever eva-iuated both under controlled and natural in-festations, in three locations.

Self-fertility degree was determirned at NoviSad in 1985, as the ratio betw'een the meannumber of filled seeds on the bagged headsand the me'an numben of filled ,seeds on theopen pollinated heads, multiplied by- 100.

- In Jome cases, 'incomplete or unreliable datawere 'obtained, 'due to either unfavourable 'c1i-matic conditions or to certain accidentalcauses. Such data were not included in thispaper. No results were received from B' ]oca-iions (Pisa Italy, ,sindos - Ç1ssce, J(aradj'- Iran, Be'it-Dagan - Israel, Islamabad -Pakistan, Cochabamba - Bolivia and La Pla-tina - Chile).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

As in the previous experimental cy'cles, theresults obtained in the last biennial trial dis-piayed a large diversity of the response ofsunÎlower génotypes to the environrnentalvariations. Certain hybrids exhibited howevera relative constant good behaviour from lôca-tion to location and'from year to year.

Authors.' see Annex 1.

Data procèssing and interpretation: Liais^on Centreof Funihilea, P.omc-nia (A. V. VRÂNCEANU'Fl. M. STOENESCU ond GABRIELA SOARE)

INTRODUCTION

One of the most ,active and fruitful sub-'nietworks of the F.A.O. Research Network qn

Sunflower has been the s-ubnetwork on theexperimentation of sunflower hybrid cul:tivàrs in international trials. It started'thisactivitv in 19?6 and has already completedten yéars of joint investigations divided infive biennial cycles.

The results of the previous four cycles werepublished in the Scientific Bulletins lel,la,iVumbers 7/1978, 2/1979, 3/1980, 5/1982 and7/1984. ':

This paper presents the results of the fifthbienniàf ôycle 1984-1985 obtained by 2?

governmenial research institutions from 19

éountries of Europe, North, Centr:al and SouthAmerica, Asia and Africa.' ,The names of the participants belonging tothese institutions and who condu'cted theco-operative trials are listed in Annex 1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The hybrid genotypes under testing, listedin Annex 2, originate from the most impor-tant ,sunflower breeding centres of Europeand North and South America and they repre-sent the rnost recent achievements in thisfield. The investigated set of genotypes wasmad,e up of 30 singie rtrybri:ds, 3 three-wayhybrids and one open pollinated variety. Th"Argentine hybrids did not enter all trials due

1o -the delay in shipping the seed samples by

the respective supplying'centres.'The trial instructions were improved in

view of the simplification of data collectionand interpretation.

T,he experimental design was the randomi-zed blocki with 5 replications. Entry rando-mization for each location was establisheddifferently by each participating institution.1.!he plot size was s'o 'estabilished that after'discaiding the borders (the two margi-nal rows and two frontal plants in each row),

Page 2: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

ANNEX ILIST.OF PARTICIP"ANT{I IN ÊA.o.

CO-OPERA|IIVE TRIALST(r9E4-1985)

d location Name

AustriaFuchsenbigl

BulgariaG. Toshevo

CzechoslovakiaRuzynè

CyprusMorocarnbos

GerrnanSr F. Rep.Gross-Gerau'

Hunga^ryIregszemcse

HungarySzeged

ItalyOsimo

PortugalElvas

RomaniaFundulea

D. WolffhardtBundesanstalt f.Alliiertenstrasse

Pflanzenbau und Samenprûfung,1. rffien II

1984-1985

1984

1984-1985

1984-1985

1984-1985

1984-1985

1984-1985

1985

1984-1985

1984-1985

1984:1985

1984i1985

1984

1984-1985

1984-1985

1984-1985

r985

I. V. IvanovInstitute for Wheat and Sunflower General Toshevo 9520, TolbuhinA. KovâèikResearch Institute for Crop Production, 161.06

A. HadjichristodoulouAgricultural Research Institute, Nicosia

W. SchusterInstitut fûr Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenzûchtung,Universitât Giessen, 23 I.udwigstrasse, 6300 Giesserl

Lajos PintèrResearch Institute for Forage Crops,Szentlôrinc, P.O. Box 805, H-7940, Irêgszerncse

Frank JézsefGabonatermestési Kutatô Intezet Cereal Research Institr.lte,Pf: 391. H-6701.

Istituto Sperimentale per -le Colture -Industriali,Via di S. Biagio 600 27 Osimo (Ancona)Maria I. VivasEstaçao Nacional de Melhoramento de Plantas, 7351 ElvasA. V. Vrânceanu and F. M. StoenescuResearch Institute for Cêreals and Industrial Crops,8264 Fundulea. Cà1àrasiElena AndreiAgricultural Experimental Station, Podu lloaie 6623, judetul Iaçi

RomaniaPodu Iloaie

SpainCôrdoba

TurkeyEdirne

TurkeyIstanbul

YugoslaviaNovi Sad

MexicoCiâno

EgvptSakha

ArgentinaMiramar

IndiaIore

PhilippinesMuËoz

Juan Dorninguez-GimenezNational Research Centre for Oil Crops,,lNIAiFinca Alameda del Obispo, Apartado 240, CôrdobaBùlent KiralAgricultural Reseârch lnstituEnver HûsemogluAgricultural Research Institu

P.O. Box 161 Edirne

P.K. 18 Sefak - IstanbulD.Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Maxima Gorkog 30, 21000

CENîRAL AND NOBTH AMERICALeo QuilantanINIA. Centro de Investigaciones Agricoias del Noroestre, CIANO,Valle del Yaqui, Calle Norman E. Borlaug, Apartado Postal 515,Ciudad Obregon, Son. MexicoJerry MillerU.S.D.A. Oilseeds Investigations, Walster Hall, Dept. of Agronomy,N.D.S.U. Fargo, North Dakota - 58105

AFRICABadr A. HlahmarOil Crops Research Section, Field Crops Institute, Orman-Giza

SOUTII AMERICAAna Lilia Gonzales de SchelottoChacra Experiuiental de Miramar,Casilla Correo 35, Miramar 76ti? (Buenos Aires)

K. GiririrajUnivprsity of Itural Sci Bangalore 5-60065

1984

1984-1985

Filomena F. CamposDirector, Research and Development;Central Luzon State University, Muftoz Nueva Ecija

EUBOPE

1985-1986

Page 3: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

c:È:û?9<io?

.?ee l:9

nr

rr

;

N;ôn

.i

n

s:pË38FfftttttÊiaaÀûû

=

gBi Ë Ë Ë n Ë Ë Ë e Ë ;;*Ë ; ËiË gË

Ëi ;, Ë Ë EE

HHRRHRHHHH.-,oouaeqqaeq!2e999 gÇUôUôU6ôôô-

É co (') o trl o É Êa m m É Êa m q Fq |Jl c.l Êq

ù0a,oF

sril rrê:kieq?q(?

dNddN.

"1i<:q I I

gqqq I t

'?|lll

eqeo? I t

iilill

e":ree INNdd

3riltl

ino?1ô:4

''11 | | r I

qê?er:..:c

:i| il 1

[il il r

eno: l.!!r

ettltc

ano??'1o?dNNdN

ot I t | |ir | | | |

cllllll

xil r l

no:n I I I

êN@tsONddÉs:oo'dÈÉilrÉ

qlltrt

qqlqa?<:

Sr ril

{iici!:êdo;

3il il 1

qo:9u?og I-ÈR8R'

o?qelt I

dd

;clllll

riÉiÉ | |

ô?jj<1 | |

a

F

s

E

.)

!Éoa)a

EgËEEËEËËÊEËË3ËË3Ë3Ë3TË:3883ËËôl

6

qrc)

;

o?

r.;

r

N

ht-

;

N

nr

N

n5N

r

N

'i

r

N

ôit

qN

;

6ôlN

h

rôN

r

di

r

n

rN

srJiN

N

N

\tl

N

N

;

\tl

NN

hN

/i

h

rô;

mN

rôr

ho;

OJ

riNN

ôn

N

N

m

h

m

+N.Nr

N

N

;

N

o

oU

IoÉr

o

H

oo:!x

à6I

u

o

u6

oo

ct

o

ÊÈ

Ox

<th

ôl

6

N

m

È.-

r

ô{

ôlôn

r

;

m

m

<.

rr

<.6â

ren

.Àôn

@ôâ

ôi

m

mcô

h

ôn

ôt

rl)

N

r+ôit

ôl

N

N

ôt

<r

m

ao

eN

c!co

cn

mrôcn

ôi

t-

t:

ôI

N

ôJ

mrm

nrim

r

Nm

mrôl

m

ôil

m

c!

N

$

ô!

coN

s-ôn

N6ô

om

6

hôl

N

rN

ô{

<l

6

ts-

r

ôl

r

N

Ë

N@

æ

oôrN

N

qoô

<.

cnN

t:N

<:rôô

c{æ

ôn

rN

m

<rm

F.ôl

cl

6

--Nrm

hm

m

N6ô

gJ

r

r

ts-ôt

h

6

.;6Yi

rôl

\tl

r

u?

Nh

hc{cô

m

ôl

{.N

cct

nN

^i

r

^i

hc.iN

6

$

\t

h

m

6

rc{

-qo:

N

mcrl

OJN

rco

6lF

<.

<l

t-

{:N

r<t{

ri

F<.

ri

rçi

ciN

ËN

.;

";

6

cn

N

t:

;d?

di

g!rÀl

rôaA

qN

om

s

mmm

6

h

N

N

$

m

:

co

m

rN

J(lm

N

r

r

mFN

N

r

6

o

lir ônÉ6NN

--Ài

h$ôiN

<héNc!N

hÈmr<iciddrÊÈÉ

-::t"6ôroo):ÊtÊ

edNÊ

o)bNÈ

NæC!d)

t'- CO OJ $ÉF-COÊ

^lÊÈc{

diN

nôt

N

N(0rcidN

sF-coÈôil ôl

nq?r6ôl cil

co :!i

NN

NôI

N

o

ô?ô!,1q€{:n$.d{NNNôI

d?ôcqô?Ot.-OrNÊdÊ

tt{

<t{;

qc!qq?o?oNoJosNMNNM

--j-:NC)ÊHNNNNôtrôI

m

ôthN

';

F-ê)oÊhæcilÊÊ

60:oio:ÊÊN

:tr

Nqqnm0rÈÈÊc-l

-t: q a?OJcO6rÊN

q?u?qôr ôl ôn

drcnôIÈN

ærrocohmôtrN

ônooôi di c"jôINN

-r.: {: I c!6h6hNNCnôi

o!qdl<idlgOHNÊNC.i

ol cr? rirôhloôtNôn

coNrdi c\i ciNôIÊ

ho:Êco

ôl coôJHNr

N6ô

-: .:t- O)ôl

s? ôT ô? q -i:o$orNNmæm6ô

a--*ÈNgiôôNNNÊê]N

diN

lôN

c:No

(?

r;N

<.C.r

NôI

qhô:

ôl

m

\ôn

oNôl

ônNN

ri

È:G

ærôtN

coFdNÀlN

rdt

ôtct

h

N

<roJoJ

!*l Ê {{c-hcodôlH

ôâ str

ôit ô!

ôn ôil

r€NN

F-ol

F

m(oÊ€NÊ

oiËÊ ô-l

d) oôNNNN

dlqqqd?qq?qO)$O$O@OOJÈN6-iÈNÊô-trÊ

**--aa-a"6)OâOCôOJOdæÊNNÊÈdNd

<tr

æc.riN

'.!

N

N

N

ôt

6!

ôt

(?

N

ÈN

NæCOd{N<{@dÊOmmôôæm

hæoJ<rÊd<{É<toô! ôl Àl ôt ôI

diN

h\tlôl

(1

N

nN

N

m

ÈmN

r

o)$N ô-l

m$^lN

NTc\È

<ta

OJ

^l

N

NN

ôl

\<t{cit

cit

m

nN

<.N

;

N

(?

ô

I

lÈo l.idt-6li,

tÈlEI

bl)k

sqolnô!ærNo)NNNN

d)t'-NS,i;;ÀmiÊ1ô

cl

m<.

-i: cg ul

R*RnqnmoôlcâcrJm

qricqôIÈ-OSNN

cg dl -tôimNÊNm

co È :ft;:;NôICN

rohÊo)o6ôNN

@rrNNM

qt:NM

orïqmmôn

^*oh<tmmæ

Yu?ololôiÈ-ÊrmNmôn

n -4 -,: cqN\ttSæd! m c'ô ô!

rN

;

ri

u?ônôô

";

m

rcn

<t{

nm

sN

c.j

@ts-

r

o?={eôtctd

t'- È O)mrcô

$m{læCONÊÊN

j

6;

di+ôiN

ço dr

rÈÈN

hm

N

N

N

\tN

m

:tt";

6N

m

r

ricil

\Y-gN-{ oq:ti cOH

ul d?o$NN

\Nôn

.i

.r:bcil

c!Nôit

È:

aôl

q

mr

cnN

Nôn

trs

q

rN

u?

É

cq

N

\tt Or

oJh

orNd

r:oodÈC\

\Yord{ÊÈNhoi.jÈN

<:

6{

die{

r N

.iN

rôiI

H

ôôh.À

n 6 h N (o co (o t: I: cq ôC q? q ô? q F- (o æ o) l- cô h Ê m m r N e r Ô

fi H N *ËEë N Peix ER K Ë 3N Ë K s Ë 3 NR R N 5R R R

rrO:Ê<rrmcômNÈmÊÊÈÊÈÊo)rÈæo)hoi cd cn cd di oiÊÈNÊÈÊ

lr)NN

i+r o$<{

cvl N

<1\È:nq\Nôô<tt<rmmÈÈÈÊÈÉt.:qqcqq?eq?@ææNNCOrÈÈNNÊ

Êoôærdi{rnNiÊHÊ

sccdrco

6!ÊÊÊ

nc!6m

rôsNÈ

.A

r:m

{{N

oo <, Ê r 6: r) q cg ol q 4 q q? ô! q q 4 È: 9: n :: : :! n cq ô! q q u? qË Èâ-Hx NR ËR Ë Ê R ËK RR R xR NR sNBBN * F R F

Èt!todoF

RRRRËRRRRRRËRR*RR R**HË RËRFHRRË

RR*ËËRRRËH**ËknËR kfr ËiËRiX:Fi*i

ERHfi *F ggËËHËË8fr R; E*Hfr FRË;Ëfr RER

l-;

6tt)

z

13o!0oN@

oq

oN

a0o

R E X R X fr RË fi Ë Ë * R R E k F R R * ËR i F* xi 3 Ë E fi R

\ n q ôc r: q q q <' o o q o! q q q ôl \ tl I I Î I "\ t? I Î c] \.tfr Hsss$$ç$$s$$çss$ 5Çs$5$s$$5s55

od

A

6o

h

Page 4: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

p

< H H Q E H E a g $I7 ââ+ ztFnsETH HË g F iÊi,s Ë i Ë g F $ A * p. Ë s F E,; cË a 5 i f E i s Ë É r É * ii-EËËÉ rË:=; ts-iË=Fï ;Ë*-;tg=

Ho

oo

\rrr v w wr

tlll19.r'H

-:J* 33tÈd-Bo-op

{

q

o

E

F ù û 5 5 5 È È È Ë F F F FË F ÈF s SË F Ë E $ B -$ s $ FI Ë Ë È È È 5 i o -r É æ q o F'. 6 i,' - 5 Û io i i i" !e in t'e èn \

'I:'È'À'È'È È lÈ'È rÈ È ùF È'È È È È È È 's È tÈ È È À È a À u u u-r ts o,È'È u q qi ëi 5 5 G & ên ô 6 5 5 5 5'ô :r so 90 I 9o p 9 f, !ea i" Ë ib \ Ë b b ;s' ;- ;- i., in'c' tn b ôo'u',s bo b q,' bo èr ô ic H -r ss c"

,È,à È,+. È À,È,s,r È'è''}.'È È È È È È â E g È Ë Ë È Ê p s F $90 Sp È :.r I p 90 9o êc -{ È 9c P !n PÈ È q æ { o * *''+'o iâ ;È bo

"È :c ;È'co in ;È''5 b Û b q'F c) æ æ 1o 1c

ûÈsâÈÈûsÈÈÈûûÈÈâ È&ùÈFÈ ÊÈËF5ÊFFâ 6 b' G i" at 5 Ë''+' tt b 5 à? G Lt

"tr b irt'o i \ ê" \'æ's êc io c q o

âûÈâÈÈEùÈâùÈàârùËËËÈFÈ FsÈË5ÈËËË Ë a' Ë 5 5 a Ë Ë Ë Ë Ë Ë Ë'j'o b'o b b'o b b'q'ô b b b b'c

È È,F,F,A È. È,+. È È È È È È È g È g E È S E ê È g E F F S F@qAqqOO)'ÈOO{æq{æi' Ë 5Ë Ë Ë Ë5 Ë Ë d Ë Ë b 5 =

- - a à à'o b b bbb b bb

A È È rÈ a a,È rÈ,È È È clt È È tD gr rÈ À,r s È cft !n À À q q q'r qr uçoo{(oæo<æ56êoè1ro(bdoë6I6s,rSoP f' o NtsHË Ë d';'; Ë e; Ë â I I io il - i à i a" ù èo io br \ bo''È'6i io io èn ên

rÈ È ra È rF rF È rF rf rÈ È È rF q u tÈ'È rr u u 9-t ql 54 a q q qr q u qtl

F F F F F F 5 5 b br 6 \ :r ë r F !b ib p F 1.' P !" P I i Y .1 ï È{ { o æ s, H æ co lc \

= b bo'c>'u'o \ bo'N ip ô ô co s { N or N co a

Èis3ÈÈùÈÈûÈâsôû\ÈttËËÈ5ÈÊ55ÈÊ5à tt 6 à S i. iro - io t t - i.n'c'sr'È b i ;È io is @' o N co u Ù æ tr È

È'r È'È rS rÈ rF rA'È rÈ È È rÈ q u u È S4 9'l 91 91 i{o F N { { A 6 e crJ S crj Cc) U O H ts € N f- - - j-in ;- b: ie'o irc'co b ;- ëo èn ïs'or'o'o'æ \ -'È o F Q N

r r J!o90l'

| | tË[g

1il ilË

I I tgiË

bbirbàb

For r r rleêt | | lo

r !'!'PJ!'

| | | I t:tttlt@

ÈP9!'l'le

rrrJPS"

:os!!o!içoftNdooêN

il il tË

Fl-F9!cl,

r t r P!ô!'

I ll I r:'

|| |l t3

llllli.

|ÈSri.lr:or

!-r r r rf'Èt | | lo

lÈ!e r FFI'

r r r r rlott ttto

il r rË

irb'È'€ kb

rtll tË

ipb;-bÂeb

'@bi-btiie

il r lx

;È' ir' 'Ê ;- â ês

I t"r I rË

D

o

o

o

0g

i-i;@

@

U

oso

c5

o

oloo 3ÈSSSilRS'À 'æ to i- bo 'tr i- irt

o

uoa

tr

(D

s

qÈcr(D

t9

t

gq

'-,'"NHHHHÈËHÈÈOwwwwwwwooooooooooooQOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUc]f{ fd trt fd H rt H trl trt F r-l È5 F 15 15tsrl H H H H Fd'Îl ol

= : F rd tt rT

oodooooaoÇ)q,e,'.,-HtsÎ|*EEHE*-HFFË-*

ag{c{c{H-XhXXX

À À À'5 tS's È rS È'È È È È È È È ùr È tÈ tÈ 's È È'È'È È !'r S4 cI S46 S F 5 5 5 5 ô

= = 5 < :J :{ { ëc ô cc cc æ cc St So € @ @ o o o o

Ë'; 5 Ë ù;'o: Ë'";'J i'; j i 6 d Ë Ë t"',5 bo'N'\r ie'c^' Ln br b in in èo

tlel I

ËlF I

lBlt@l''lr3l lâ'rl

6lF IEl: l.?-l

çll5

Ël? lâ*ld I

E6O-a.- E

I

nt.p

-;m

'o

!,

?c,a

@qI

o

=pp

rd!)ûc

È,tr,F È,s. È,s. È e',,5 È (,,,r È È B È s È t E F p F Ë Ë s F Ë F!o s! È sÉ 90 È sn !n !r 90 J :-- 90 p 9n sw o æ (c ts co o (o o ts o @ F @ { ; =

i Ë ip to'N'€'le b'c'@ ô cc {

ÊÈÈËsFFÈËÈÈÊFË5ÈF5SËËË ÈËxÈg*ÈiÈ N w co c o c> H o NJ a æ F N H o in'c'<o i9 i9 o H e c ts P u F -

u 'F |tr,F 'F s,,È q s ù, u u u q u,s u u u aa qr 9t g s $ H il B $ Ëp !b !5 ;: tt - !b - |, !e tr 1., !" S,, l, Sc s, l, r !e 9p S' Ieo ts o N @ o H æ o N æ o o o Q .i ; 5 b èo b'N io èo'N'F êo w o e

ssÈâKsE$$$sKsKs$ssKsss ÈsËFËFËËË a" Ë â'à i; èo Ë Ë l; É 5'.e''È =

âl \ ir.'*'o i'o b''È tp'ts io'6' o -

q'È rà È ctr A cjr o u q u q u c, cr u q u I u lar C'r ? q SI E !l E g HlU { @ (g N @ ts N e W w N N O È N -J w È w !' !' !- y' :' y' :" :" v' -ëp in ên tn èo ;- i- ;- b èD i- \'w bo in tù'æ'€ { èp èo'o co r o d N æ æ æ

'l:{q

!9

kCI

|F'q

rfq{rÈ<){

rS ttr

qrF

Hq

Éo)

c, lalNÈ

__rF ttro){ii ;n

'F

È

|A Ctl 'È{Éç0;È b-u

ÈtFrAèo ',F 'N

'5È'ÈÈ'A'F'5rtr(,r'ÈÈo{u(0(o@o(oFæ(ob'o'o:lntn',Èbin'ok;È

rÈ|.trÈrF|È|àÀ|FÈrFÈsnPÊ!.e.(oÈsDP9nP!nco o) oJ c0 c.n È o) w u { c.rl

'è 'F rtr 'SCOQ-J*:

f.r tn 'u b

'trrS|À|AOOFF€:-f,(rF

q È q rÈ u u a q qtr sr q q q u q u u cI 9l !{ !4 9l ? CJr etr qr q 9l q" ?N a a e o o æ w Ë Ë Ë N'È è N É ùi ô æ \' !') St È s u È'à 9p È l-

= È';

='* ù t û Ë 5 a, i" t Ë àl io à; b' b'u b io lF'Èe',È'.o'æ -N ie

rÈClqq

qHF9q

,È rS 'È

rFqqrfWb's'æ'o

qcn

ôi

|F{rcr o)

q{'uÈ:-

uuuÉqo'o\-o

-Jq{'€{tn

rÈq

ÈÈ. t.. :^w

UqUfJlqrÈqtgU|ÈrFCr!TVNNtsO{ONN(O@O

È .r :-.-9. {h 1H* È .|e -P*-S"l-+e_9.._qnæOçgÉ{@C,rqOJCDL9

|tr cp w rÈ rè'È rF rF lF w rF'È rÈ rÈ rs È,È rÈ )r'È È È È À a a rF È È È[e ô @ w iie iie ù ô Ë- 6 ile ;- is q Ë Ë æ F êJ e,, iù !9 9. w w'5 È È 9: SP

'; Ë Ë û G'iJ 5 5 i ù 5 k i; Ë k Ë i u' i u' i, \ k'o is'N b b'o :r

|F È lF È È |à rÈ q IF È 15 |È IÈ U IF È È è È È È S4 È q À O IS U'I\ È

F F F 5 F F F Ë F F !b F F F !b !b J È P J SN :. 9N P T T !' ? .* Pig"Èi'tto'oo i- -J'o)ëp'[J -J co ll9b oti\9 eo b'H cosr ts ts H co e F o cr' o)

,s

|5

('l

d

N

'È-l

q

,ÈÈ|SrÈ{oo(o{coFt9u_._--_.:*(nu'SqOO@tsèe 'H te '!o

-

ONWNrfoJ(oO

qucrl0NNIWrÈi.k\ip

(tl

{q

rÈÈcIdcrÈ

rÈ lÈ-N

bo

;+ ;-

uuH qrl

È

{

rS tà{q

_..:r5ÈærS'N'rS

HSË r,n

*-'^ :^

lÈ-l;F

'Èëo

'qJt

i-

-J

|5q

È

ui-

rÈ qI !È ùtrrÈOq@bie'Hb

ÀÈÀrÈqCorSlf't9 "'à ip \

*g9Qç0in 'Ot 't9 'q

-

,sÀlfUPgo9090€a{N

rÈ rÈoJ{

-*èD ''è

--_-C^t gO

JPuq,

rÈuÉ{

;À:rS ,È

{u

c, c^,

ie ''È

(tr rÈ

{

'F

rtrb.9

rF

{u:

{\

|A

T

È

N

q

|s

;^

t.

rF

il!N'rS

Èq;"

{irt

Èq{

È

rts'À lÈ rÈ rF rf ,È,f tÈ È È È t.È È È 'È È È È È'tr È È'È È }È'tr È È Èu a Nt N F q'r p's F tr F !" F ib' P F !t J Sn I J 9n J Sn I J 9o 90 90 9Ài,nboi-bo i,ù in ëe'Nt'o ô in'ts-æ-'F N t5o ô cr o \J q { u s o) o o N oo

A 's'È æ À rÈ lr È |5'S È È È È È a ù À ùtr È È È'F tÈ rÈ À À'5'À ÀF 5 ;- 6 F &? 9 sn F F F F F F F c" F iie q ô Ë' o æ a æ o { a Ô s5 I i" Ë ; .j Ë Ë o c.o c^, c.t w ts q'to'; \ \ ëe''5'F yN'te'N'w'co èo'F

Page 5: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

ANNÈX ,Llst of sunliowêr single (SH) and three--wav (TH)n"l"iAi. and open potiinateil'varieties;(OPV) in the

exPerimental cYcle 19E4 and 1985

'ltaking into account the generai seed yieldm.ans, -18 hybnids were statisticaly similar,yieldin$ from 24.9 to 28.0 q/ha (Table. 1). TheLvbridJ Select and Cargil 20? from this grouphâd signifioant seed yield differences from thegroup o,f the last 10 entries, in which the open

folliàated vari'ety Peredovik was included'' Sorne hybrids perfonmed very well in more

than four" locatioirs, : showing thus a good' en-'vironmental adaptability, as : Select (at Fun-dulea, Podu Iloaie, h'egszem'cse, Szeged; NoViSad, Édirne, Côrdoba,.Ruzyné and Sakha), Cgr-eill 207 (at Iregszemcse, Szeged, Ruzyné, Sakha'Fargo, iiano),-NS-Helios (at Fundulea, Szeged,Novî Sad; Edirne, Ruzyné), NS-Condor (at Iregs-zemcse, Szeged, Côrdoba, Ruzynè), Triumph 570(at Edirne, Côndoba, RuzYné, Ci'ano).

As seed yield, oil content in dried seeds alsovaried gteâtly fnom locati'on to location andfrom yàar tô year, but the classification ofhybrids has repeated al,most the sarne patterniri all environments, sho-Wing: the hereditarystability of this character in spite of its largephenotypical variability (table 2).

Tabte 3

seôo yielo and oil "",Ïfft;ï.rded at Fuchsenbigl

CultivarsGenetic-type SupplYing

country

ArgentinaArgentinaArgentinaArgentinaArgentinaAustriaAustriaBulgariaBulgarià

RomaniaRomaniaSpain'SpainU.S.A.U,S.A.U,S.A.U.S.A.YugoslaviaYugoslaviaYugoslaviaYugoslavia

P-?5P-?8P-BO

G-90G-100Hysun 32 'Paeific 308

H. No. 617

Peredovik}I-2rS/79 'H-13/80}l-L414/79Kollor 3

Citosol 4

Citosol F-lIBH-160IH-173IH-51SuPerSelectFelix

SHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHoPvSHTHTHSHSHSHSHSHSHTHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSH

,, sqSH

GermanY F.R.

GermanY F.R.

GermanY F.R.HungarYHungaryHungarYHungaryHungarYI:IungarYRomaniaRomâniaRomaniaRomaniaFundulea 55

Fundulea 56

Florom 305

Adalid B

Arbumg 353

Sigco, 448

Interstate 7111

Cargill 20?

Triumph 570

HS-FlowerHS-ShineNS:Qondôr'NS-Helio$

Seed yield (q/ha,0o/o moisture)

%oirin drymatterCultivars

Hysun 32

Pacitic 308

H. No. 617

PeredovikH-2rgt79H-13/80

}j-t414i79Koflor 3

Citosol, 4

Citosoi F-1

IIT.1?3

IH-51Super

Select

FelixFundulea 55

Fundulea, 56

Florom 305

Adalid 8

Arbumg 353

NS-Flowert

NS-shineNS-CondorNS-Helios

'Mean

15.4

51.5

47.2

51.1

16.7

24.4

19.8

18.5

20.6

19.4

18.3

21.5

20.2

20.2

19.1

t9.2

20.3

17.9

2L.5

20.7

20.8

18.0

1.9.4

79.4

31.4

32.5

31.0

32.6

33.1

31.5

30.9

32.8

32.4

27.0

25.1

28.4

29.3

33.7

36.6

31.0

30.0

35.3

30.4

51.8

the mean seed yield ranged greatly, from72.2 q/ha at blvas, in 1985 to 46.4 at Szeged,in thè same year (Table 1). Good yield levelswere reçorded not only ih zones with favour-abte conditions for sunflower cropping, as

South-East of Europe, but also in France, Fe-deral Republic of Germany,, C5r,prus, Czecho-slovakia,'Egypt and U.S.A. A major cause ofthe reiativs low yields in sorire locations couldÈ consride,red tlhe 'disease attack. So, Sclero-tini,a' sclerotiôrum :affected heavyly sunflowera't Novi Sad (198a; 1985), G. Toshevo (1984),

Çross-Gêrau .(1984,: 1g8p), Podu Iloaie (1984'1'985), Iregszemcse (1984, 1985) and Fundulea(1984) ; Phoma oléracea at G. Toshevo :(1984);Botrytts ctneîea at Iregszemcse -(1984; '1:9-85)

and Gros-s-Gerau (1984, 1985) ; Phomo0sis he-tianthi,& Novi Sad (1984, 19.85) and Fundulqq(1984) ; Scleroti,um bataticola at Szeged (198q)and Iregszemcse (1985) i Altetnaria sp. at G.ToshevJ(tg84), Iregszemôse (1985) ; Orobanchecurnana' at Novi Sâd (1984) and Edirne (1985). L.S.D. 5%

Page 6: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

iiigh.oil .raiues f"om, 55 to 58ô/6 were reéor-ded in Cyprus, .France, Yugoslavia and Roma-nia. The annual'trial means were higher than500/s in four cases (Select, Super, Funduleg b6and Adalid 8). Eleven hybrids were statisti-cally similar, with the general means rangingfrom 48.80/6 to 50.807'1;. There have been àlsôhybrids with a lower level of oil content, asfor instance IH-51, IBH-I60, Cargill207, Flo-rom 305 and H-1414/79 indicating the stillexisting low' selection pressure for this im-portant economic character in certain, ceses.

The data from Fuchsenbigl (Austria), whichprovlde usçful information for Central Eu-rope, are presented separately for seed yieldand oit content (Table 3), because a different

Table 4Seeil yiblil and some seed and plant traits recorded

at G. Toshevo ,(Bulgaria) in 1984

Tabte 5

Seed yield and sorne seedand plant tralts.recorded at Bangalore (Injlia)

in 1985

Cultivars1 000seed

weight(c)

Feedyield(q/ha,

.0%rnors-lUre)

o,b oilin dryrnatter

No. ofdaysfromemer-genceto flo-wert

64685665636B656459Jâ616260606259625l57606358606261

Plantheight(cm)

Ilysun 32Pacilic 30.8H. No. 617PeredovikKoflor 3Citosol, 4Citosol F-lIBH-I60IH-173IH-51SuperSelectFeIix.tl unoulea tDFundulea 36Florom 305Adalid IArbumg 353Sigco 448Cargill 20?:'NS-FlowerNS-ShineNS-CondorNS-HéliosMean

P-?5

P-78

Hysun 32

PaciÏic 308

H. No. 617

PeredovikIl-ztg/79H-13/80

}I-t4L4/79

Koflor 3

Citosol 4

Citosol F-1

IBH-160

IH-1T3

IH.51Super

SelectFelixFundulea 55

Fundulea 56

Florom 305

Adalid B

Arbumg 353

Sigco 448

Interstate ?111

Triumph 5?0

NS-FlorverNS-Shine

NS-CondorNS-Helios

, Mean

L.s.D. 5%

I

L.S.D. 5olo

Cultivârs

SelectSigco 448PeredovikNS-S[ineH-13igoFlorqm 305rH-173Felix'NS-HeliosNS-FlowerIBH.16OSuperCargill 207Interstate 7111H-L4t4/79IH-51H-2I9/79Fundulea 56ArbumgH. No. 617Adalid B

Fundulea 55Koflor S '

HS-ConôorTriumph r5?0.Citosol .4 , 1t 16

17.526.5L2.720.416.517.8L7.619.9L7.212.618.823.920.8t8.217.319.014.020.918.325.324.6r7.622.422.419.3

40.04L.436.737.339.939.539.236.634.333.538.542.138.137.986.t39.840.536.439.136.635.237.137.837.138.0

B674',

12379

10695B7

102113118108 .

106110',

01L2g92

116 i:

109110,

7910110896

119tzs

415445D/3433304240425454564l42:)tÀD

50404l484543511D

t41315t3161515131B

llr ,15"'1615'jL215it41516'151l16,t5t614-.r16. ,

168191132r97178t94174isot52137135t4L14?I45\62136166153135'r54186161r73'185r62

29.8

2B.B

30.9

29.8

20.9

23.3

2L.7

19.0

21.9

L9.2

20.2

29.3

20.0

2t.3

2L.6

26.3

2t.L

29.r,L4

25.4

2t.9

30.9

32.9

2t.l28.8

29.8

26.0

31.?

28.5

30.6

33.7

26.0

45.4

47.0

50.8

47.6.

48.9

,49.2

47.1

45.6

44.5

45.3

43.0

4t.6

40.3

44.9

45.1

50.0

49.9

51.8

48.0

52.5

44.7

51.3.

50.3

45.3

50.6

44.4

48.5

51.7

52.6

48.6

49.6

47.8

28.9

27.9

24.8

27.7

23.r

24.6

25.7

28.8

29.4

26.7

28.7

27.5

31.3

28.6

28.3

22.9

25.9

24.0

24.0

22.0

27.7

24.4

25.3

26.5

23.7

28.8

28.L

24.3

23.6

27.7

25.6

26.3

r25

123

124

t26rrz133

t23L2B

126

L26

rt7118

L25

tzïr20

133

t27

727

t20

L26

11?

126

r23774

118

t22130

131

118

728

L29

124

136

L4L

L46

166

151

183

166

139

138

138

146

L42

156

128

743

143

151

149

136

t26160

14q

148

74L

140

143

166

L73

136

166 ,

t67

L49

ct57

53

61

53

67

59

62

60

50

46

4B

55

59

62

60

60

74

61

51

65

82

64

49

60

58

51

65

54

66

62

5B

weight(e)

Table\ 6

Results obtained at Muftoz (Philippines)

18.30.?4,8

0006eed

INo. ofdaysfromemer-genceto ma-turity

.85'85B98487B585B6B9B7B688B687'85848BB5B7828888s6B78987

ola

u$-fiUeil

. seeds

207

20.420.319.819.5,18.7

18.718.618.518.3

, 1?.8,17.6'17.3

'L7.2,1?.û'16.616.616.516.5 "

16.316.115.615.3 ',

15.3L5.2,14,9 i

76.776.474.2

:73.070.2-70.469.569,368.466.864.764.964.464.162.462,462.061.961.159.058.5D7.+58.557.056.0.51.3

27.427.027.927.831.,1

25.382.B31.840,632.027.233.829.327.64L.627.42B.B

' 32.1, 31.6.31.636.236.540.64r.242.642.8

Is""al I I lN.o.orlI vield | .., .- I I r ooo I qays

I

curtivars | -q:?.: l'#:*T" I

"ï-' I "1","'Ëi', | Ë:l"i: | {':'H1

;turerl I I llitril

L.s.D. 5% 2:1 e.9 1.6

Page 7: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

hurnber of hybrids was tested each year. Se-par.ately also (Table 4) are presented the {e-sults obtained at General Toshevo'(Bulgaria)in one single year. An incour-p'lete set of ,cul-tivars was tested at Batgalore (India). Table 5gives interesting informa'tion not only, on seedyield and oil content, but also ,en some seedand plant traits.

As conce$s t[e ,experimentation at Mufloz(Philippines), we have been infonmed that thetrial of the' y,ear 1984-1985: was, depreciatedby certain unfavourable, envi.ronmental condi-tions. Table 6 comprises the,results obtainedin the year 1985-1986. Seed yield seems.tobe negatively ,correlated: with the, percentageof unfilled seeds. Two hybrids, , Select, andSigco 448, with ,the best seedsetting, yieldedover 20 q/ha.

No. of days frorn emergence to

The main morpho-phy,siological character-istics ,are ptesented in Table 7. A large varia-tion of tl-re growing period and piant heigft!has .,been noticed among cultivars and .loca-lities, indicating the influence of photoperiodon some genotypes. Generally, sunflower hy-brids tested iin network trials rang'ed fromm,edium-early to medium-llate as far as thenurnber of d4ys' from emergence to physiolo-gical maturity is concerned,and from medium-short to tali regarding plan-t height.

In comparison with the open pollinated va'qiety Perrdovik; certain hybnids had. superiorvalues of volumetric seed weight and seed size,but sorne of them had smailer s,eeds and lowerweight of 1,000 seeds. A better resistance, tolodging was noticed alrnost to ali hybrids. Plantuniformity of the single hybrids was very good

Table 7

Reslstanceto loal8tng

(mean appre-ciatlon)

flowering,Plant height

.(cm)

limits

t{usk6(%)

Cultivarsmaturity*T-

rlimits lmeanI

P-75

P-?8

P-80

Hysun 32 -

Pacific 308

H. No. 617

Peredovik}I-2t9/79H-13/80

H-t4t4/79Kôflor 3

Citosol 4

Citosol F-lIBH-160

IH-173

IH-51

Super

Select

FelixFunduleà 55

Fundulea 56

Florom 305

Adalid B,

Arbumg 353

Siêco 44s

Iiiterstate ?111

Cargiil 20?

Triumph 570

NS-Ftrolrier

NS-Shine

NS-Condor

NS-Helios

70-88?4-8987-9564-906B-9562-8767-9066-9560-8161-8665-9564-9563-9562-9060-9060-88,64-86

66-9065-8962-8760-9060-8961-8961-8661-9060-8661-8665-9263-9063-8?63-9065-90

BO

81

91

B1

82

,, ?6

'80

59

55

56

51

5B

D4t

60

62

61

62

52

50

4S

6l59

Dl

59

66

63

53

69

62

61

53

60

61

55

60

52

tt53

26

23

28

25

26

23

23

23

24

2t24

26

28

27

23

27

23

25

23

23

23

25

24

25

25

26

25

24

24

24

26

2t-3220-262t-3218-3917:3418-2520-2720-262t-272t-2816-3119-3222-382r-9518-2919-31'19-27

22-34t9-2720-28t5-282r-1922-762t-2723-3119-3120-n19-291B-3220-2620-28

very good

very good

very good

very good

good

feeblegood

good

good'

good

good

very good

very good

very good

very good

very good

very. good

very good

good

good

very good

very good

good

good

very good

good

very good

cgodvery goôd

good

verlt good

very good

80

?3

76

79

BO

78

78

..1'I

78

80

79

tt

78

78

67

78'la

76

lc

78

tl

80

80

Morpho-physiologleal characieristics

104-132 | 120

101-130 | 122

114-131 I 127

101-r31 | 121 '

112-133 | 125

99-139 I 118

101-151 | 125

L04-t431 124

9?*146 | 120

97-149. t2296-139 | 119

97-132 I 118

94-130 | 115

96-145 | 124

94-153 | 120

9B-126 | 116

101-139 I 123

r02-L451 r24[04-r32 I tzO

101-142 | 121

97-134 | 1rB

97-r4B | 120

101-146 | 123

99-135 I 11?

101-145 | 121

95-143 | 118

93)-1391 118

104-1511 126

101-152 | 123

95-129 | 1t5

104-150 | 12?

104-151 | 125

102-18611.0-172

t02-220117-189

tzt-2rr118-225130-226r2B-222110-177

105-178

112-180

99-180104-182

101-197

193-1Q2

92-18394-188

104-192

97-195

91-182106-191

1Q3-181

101-1?9103J1ql1oÇ132101:178

T4L

143

rB0

L57

165

150

173

169

136

149

134

t47

r44155

135

143

149

160

156

134

132

149

150

t4ôL47

l4L148

166

16?

L42

164

166

10?-198110-200

109-205

99*196108-219

t 07-205

33-4533-4532-4437-5035-4632-4532-4439-4835-4035-4534-4738-4937-4832-4735-4634-4437-44J T_AI

33-.18

35*5037-4633-4434-4632-4634-4635-4433-4635-4635-4629-4835-4535-.!6

40

40

37

43

4L

40

38

çJ

39

40

4T

42

42

4l40

38

40

4l40

40

44

39

4L

43

39

39

42

4L

4l40

42

42

45-8447-7944-7626-7134-7735-7738-7949-774B-7252-7725-7425-7025-713B-8147-7639-8049-8033-7641-8042-7542-8244-9432-8036-8231-6635-?734-7440-8139-8329-7A38-7936--68

Page 8: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

ând :gdod,' in',co4itràlst ,with.thê. threje-way: hy-bri'ds' an d' .: th e. open p oll,inat éd ; ùêriety i'Peredo'-vik'''wh,icH idisplayéd a satibfactory :ând' res'pêôtivelji poér 'iuniformity. ' Head dlarnetervaried wirthin traige lirriits;,but the rnèan va-ïués wer'e' re'latrively 'ilose r(Tab'Ie,.,8). Manyh5bridd exhi,bited * nigfr'"eù-fertility'd"gt"Ë,The high''percertt'age of 'male,","oi1u :ptrânts incertâin hybrlds'(.II-617, H-1414/79,r II.13/80)lridicàtes ftte hetero2y€o,Éity of the Rf :gênes'inthe male patênt or sôm,e defi,ciencies in hybridSeedproductlon. '1 :'

'TâbIe'9i shoWè The lr.dsponse to the', âttack ofthe ri,àih sunflower pathogehs'; The rnost re-sistant i to, Seterotlnia sclerotiorurn wefe ' thêhybrids: NS-Flowe'r, NS-Helios (root, attack);

. r li I

: ,' lr ,

Head and flower characteristics

male

Cultivars

Select,,,,f1iuinph.b70, 11s21977$ t(stem ettâelç),:CitosÔl.4r:'Sélêst;r,4nd ' IIL51 (head ,Attack)., :.",{

better ,rêsporise lo Pkorù,a oleraeêù displayedSigco.448 and'N$-Shine àîd to Botrgtls. cxmer6a'NS-Condor,',Ftrôrorn;805,-.Qi1o.5t F1 .and Cito-so14. The,Iùomanidn:-hybrlds $elect and Feli*dnd the Yugoslavian hybrids :rNS-Flower, i,NSi.Helios, NS-Condor and NS-Shinèr manifested-a,clear - cut r reslstaRce r to : the attack ;' o1, P h omao si sheli,anthi,i;'gr fl6fgn1 hairnf.ul fungus,.in' màii'yEunopean:i.:,cotl,ntries causing sunflorwer steTncanker. iCertain hyb'rids ,sho.rvr:d à good pesiS:tanee ,to Sclerotiarii bataticota. Puc6:ih,ia hëli:anthi'artd, Alternari,a sp. . i -.

' The "reactisn tô Pla:èm,obafe hëL,,tanëhi 'couldnot be:èvaluatèd undet"' hatùrrâ|. or,r artiticiUtfnf,ection,: because :mosf, .of:; gsgfl sarnples weretreated with metalaxyl before being ,mai-led tothe participants.

Fecause new, more virulent races of Oro-I brinchè ôu.rnana have spread in South=East Eu-u ..ropg,, ,a contro9.Ied infestation test with broom-

'rape seeds collected frorn, South-East Romaniaand West Turkey was pèrformed ,at.Funduleain,1985 (Tab1e l0).,'Adding to this test the ob-

Head diameter(cm)

limits

EIeadben-ding .

Bterile'plants(me-ans)

P-75

P-?8

P:80

L2:2Ll2-2Lt4-20t2-2811-30tL-2712-28t2:27L2-29L2-25t2-28l2:27t2-24

I

t2-2612-27t2-3212-29t2-29t2-27t3-27L2-26t2-29t2-27L2-25

.t2-29L2-2511-26IL_2JL2-2511-30

':.t2-29L2:29

29'o

;6tl

:):)

0

26

6

16

16

4

38

3?

35

45

27

15

I'

28

B

3

I33'29

t225

11

4B

59

:)

L7

t7IO

18

l918

1B

L7

16

18

1B

1B

1B

20

L7j

18

19

19

19

18

18

20

1B

18

19

18

18

18

1S

18

18

19

- " :' i r 'itr

Number of Orobanche cumana stemsTlower plant

Tablp.l0

Fundulea (1985) .

(artificial infestation):.." Naturâl' lnfettatioil

per one $un:Hvsun 32

Pacific 308l, 1l

H. No. 61?

PeredovikH-2L9/79

H-13/80

:F^-r4L4/79

Koflor 3 '

Citosol 4

Citosol

rPH-16q

IH-173

IH-51

99Per ..Select

FelixFundulea

FunduleaFiorom 305

Adalid B

Arbumg 353

Sigco 448

Interstate 7111

Triumphr 570

NS-FlowerNS-Shine

NS-Condor

NS-Helios

55

56

2 F medium tr-ended ;4: very bended

P-75. :P-78Ilysun 32Pacific 308 ,

H. No. 6L?Peiedovikt1-2LS/79 ' ,,H-13/80}I-t4t4/79Koflor-3Citosol 4Citosol F-1 '

IBH-160IH-173IH-51SuperSelectFeIix'Fundulea 55,Fundulea 56Florom 305Adalid IArbumg 353Sigco 448Interstgte.?111Cargill 207Triumph 570NS-Flower.NS-ShineNS-CondofNS-Helios: I '

AD-66 (checB)Boriisun 53(eheck) ;

0t2

22

23

3

0

o

0

0'0'0

I

3

I

0tt

6

'0

Cultivârs lumfrom

South-East-ern

Roma-nia

Inocu-lum

. from'westTur-;key

.iI0

29

c

0;;l

1'I

302.4

34291327101518252SL420233810I6

t92320132l1B26113616L!251a

-36

{)

663315

531

0n

340204

962

L7003

It420

1t20

i50

'2.4.9

_.

32t22

,L7,252l,10

.19 .

L+13t7

'' 11.43t423

,tr41'

''1'I

,13 ,

15,.22

,2110, i3:

,r12,9

,24..',8,t2t2til.

.;.-

.. 1010i::tB

10t2'14

:.,:8t2

I10

3

,, 13Id

10

'8',8131B16

8, '11

, ;10

:12

i3116

l.: B

2

2-3J

2

2-3t

3

3

3

3

3

2

2

3

2

3

,2

3-43

2:-33

3-43

'22..:

3-43

3-4

22203222444'2131À

2l162824352L303425t223T73436I

2r"11 ,

t732:12, ,

20t415,40.

,10

Page 9: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

saE

=,E!)!iogÉ

ëé(lâja)0{i()o€

oe)Adooc)Ê

Èq.FA

q

6oE I I I93XR I sKRSSNRËS:SBR3R:R5KB IN9S5

,!à I I I 95gK I :ËË3NHËSRNRSSRSRKHH I F"'CO6

È:sÈESFG

;>ro 5R I 9$-R33R599-S9SFB5 N999'3SNH'S3ooNû

| | | È o F (o Ê * 5 - ^ =tt 5 * H t N cô 6 <t{ 6ô 1ô m <tr d) o È cô ôI ôn Nttl

oI

tsaa4

(goH

r I I o o ca ôn r H t- @ o E .-.r I h È <{ ôl rQ !? È: tn N rô str r cc oJ m n o| | t 6â crJ m æ c! c'â N ôô ôn 6ô m cô ii iYj : ôi N câ È ôi âi N cô cô N ^l

i Ê

I

Dl)o , ! | imNt:çg55É33$Ë3X$B5F$È$$Èn33K*lllcnôâh<{m

o!0oNa

I I I R K333R3S=x3383<'= 3X-n'-'RS3*."=31æ 6 oo Eo 4 qa qt !ô <' N o d 60 h !e 3 - - * s É 3 35 3 Ë I F o F 6 <K <i 6 Ë p èô <r <t tà 6 rô t.o rô 6 N

-*- P^^-:***Fs ç 3383 S888R I I 5 I ôtr H Ê t 3 3 I 8ç RR 3 Ô Ô o od

Ê

a

a.o

o

6oI

oz

Érd =R8ç33SRS88p33R3Ro=:R33çH33goR93

ËÈqÈg

È

cl

o5 I I I SÉS*8ÈH3FRËSg3R8ËHX$$gRFHgsNH

oI I t m râ O: Ê n m o € f: f: =t !: I m F) r N H Q =r

N i æ 5) i i O) N N| | | <{ m.m <{ 6 i6 + m Àr ôr n .'t rS I ôi àô ô irj an n io rô ôr N @ (o m N r

<r. co o.n F Êr i @ o Ê <{ e! c or I d c s) m <, I 9" $ 3 s 3 s 3 F 3 F dè 6 6-ô b ô ô 6 6 ô ô ô æ É o æ o or o: 6) o) r'

oauoNo

' | | | o) N o @ æ æ otô 3t Ô cl o) b F (o o: æ o) <{ N Ê o F t'' æ cô 6o N NrtrÉÊiÊÊ

a-.NYûlauvoÈ

I I | =-'=S r3x =æ=-53rR X R'R3='"oô13(o.*'æ

3 g {. I = N 3 I Ë R Elô - <. R * 5 * : - * <' s s x :'- cô co Ê co co

5s | 55RRns3FN:RNxRFS a8sËN-99È$=R3FË'

ii>FOf!

I I I N=RæNXFN]3RN=NS:R=:XXRR3R333R

Lo

B

Èoga4

d@

6 cô <{ $ cô 6n Ê N Ê <r sn \tt (a co (n 6ô N ôl N N d) ti{ tfl \a ÉD ôI ôl d) 6i (i È côet>c

r | | d ôr cô qr ={ 6 !1 È co q? q e B fl $ B I R $ È* 3 3 E P 5 S

=BI I I iinààôiôtoN\nromæ$æ

à .ô d m Ê (o ctt h ôl O: 6 Q oJ q-n Ë æ <{ d? { qI (o ç! r: 6 ts ô! o) æ \tr (o N È''

;.ô ;i <, rô 6ô m o s ï 6 iô N F5 co n =

è 6ô + 15 h N'û + ôô to <i $ n <t{ @ È"

6o

ôçâË | | | + * .!| st Ê (o <i æ st' N @ ô? @ 6ô æ ôl <fi lô 6 F- æ tô str co Àl o Ê o o

I I I o - È d <> B: Êo o Ê È d) Ê Ho Ê o È e ôl ldi ÊN o É o o oo

o) i (o Ê ô! aq !1 N q O: o) I o) 9 cO lt! $ 6ô Ô o F oq r Ê m (c) m rtt 6) cO È @

-avriÊôi;--ÈÊÉôiÊÊÈÈr

d

o

q

oN

ul=

6o

z

l-t-I

l-

C)Ê | o O o o Q OO)OO O Ô O O O O Ô O O * I t- g)ê c) o 3 Oo Ô

i o'ê d o 1') d) O q o! i o o N N ôr c'J o fJ N d - - =

o co È Ê o (c) r o

a6

l-

I

t-

o æ r i a !a $ ri N Q çe ô !: c9 ç9 ss s ç êË9333 3 çâ$ s 3 3Ë[email protected]@!t{hhc

| | | d c-l h h h m or Q q !A q !o r r N <r N ta q? F 6 r I êr æ !t' rô 6 <{I I t @ Ër 6 h r € @ +'+ 6 s s àÀ ùr :i + ii ôi ."i @ r (o co cô r h 6 h 6

6 <{ 6 O O 6 F (€ o @ n o æ o ô{ o o o o o o o d m o o o'Â o rô cn d)rdÉof4d

o

ë

û

Er I I o È v 6ô o)æ ôl (o (o Q o: 'Q i(o co m o o o oô N 5 X 5 * I N 5

=| | l=;N; N;;=N;Êmd diNNH

g;UI

d d Ê H Ê N N d ôl È ôl Ê Ê Ê <) ô! ôl Ô È Ê o o d ôl È-o o cô ôl Àl i o

6@

q

| | t 6 (o s $ <F Ê rtr co N F I [: o: æ N 6.t q ô? E o ts di N F o ttr m :fl FI t I N c{ s o À i.j ob ;i ôi ôo æ a6 î 6 :i :i À iô h m ô i n i <{ ttr r(| N

9R - : 95É-S=S gS$RÈ9: g I3S9SÈ859* g- I

OY,tË

I t I O È cô m H rar d O c.r O O ca 6ô tt: .i N $ F @ lô F o: ôl rô d ôl lô ôl ôilrrt-

oo

Laa4

I

d

ol{

lsl6lolË| Ëqlûut-lùç| ,;ËI

lbF| Ëe

r I i {. cQ r: ri q! <. @ o) e9 n a,q ? R F R F * R R Ë Ë g g Ë =

R N 3lllNNNmNôrNNNmmô1{

I I I O O <F Ê i 6 m o o h c3 m ôr N € o) 6ô <{ o o r r ôr F o: (o o o: NIttÉé'-g;dsÊNÊÉio

| | | - ^ êô N ô! ç) {. o ôl ô! (o o o <' rô Ê (ô ôô N m 6 ô lô N d) H ôô ôr N

I I l:RË:"'= lR9=R=ÉRr::-^-:9S9':S* I

6o

a

æ @ | <r ro N ôr @ m ê! N o rr! co q! a <o q I cq -l ç g! @ æ r o o) o F F @6 6 | 6ô n r{{ @ s oà ùâï + + é l]i 6 Ë + 6 q :fl rlr d{ n <il 6â r Cc m sfl $ m

INmo6(oooc{o)coQçgeq!!om(9q{9(or.{:tF@@H6ôoo)Corhæ æ æ co 6 æ æ Ë Ë 6 6 ô o ô Ë ô é ô cb ; co è o æ Ê o 6) o $ o o €

trdÉalEË

o

?c o ê N rô o iQ co.r rô Q lô O O rô O O O O F rô |Q o N h 1r) o Ê (o co n o

HÊÊÈ---aÈÈÉdd

=

sHàËe ^Ë-*i - ;;i-i**l;Ë gë q

i i n ÊË i È n : i Ë e e g i E â# Ë Ë Ë g e â ËË gEaûgE

Page 10: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

Lino-leib/oleicratio

4.16

4.15

5.57

4.23

4.09

4.08

B.B5

3.87

4.69

4.05

8.85

3.58

4.03

8.97

4.09

4.t7

4.13

4.09

4.79

4.20

5.00

4.r5

4.65

4.81

3.70

4.06

4.78

4.24

1.28

4.53

4.57

8.77

l.r I

4.tg

.servations recordËd under natural infestationat, Edjmq] (19srf) ,gndi ,,Nb+i lpâq,. (f 9.s4); onq ..eahconc-lude :,th,at,,tne hybriâs Fèlix, NS-Flowerând Carsill-20? exhibited the best resistance.

I Table i t provides information on fatty acidscomposition based 'on seed samples receivêd,frory tlrree locations, situafed at diffeçent lati-tudes. TÈre,'analyses carried out at Fundulearevealed a great similitude amgng, hybrids

,'--, , j , ''''oil quatity expr€sseù by ,fatty acid composition;,7

-.mean valuegr (seed samlrles from : Funduleal Edirne,. Gross-Gèfau, 198{;1985)

' :',,i, ,

Cultivars

P-75P-78

P.B()

G-90

G-100

Hysun 32

Pacific 308

H. No. 617

PeredovikH-2t9/79H-13/80

H-r4l4t79KoflorCitosolCitosol

9.1

9.3

?.9

8.9

10.3

9.0

8.?

9.9

8.9

9.6

10.7

10.1,9.8

10.5

9.8

9.4

10.1

9.4

9.6

'9.19

10.5

10.3

9.5

9.3

9.7

10.3

10.3

10.8

10.7

8.7

9.2

10.2

9.5

9.6

17.6

17.6

14.0

17.4

t7.6

17.9

1B.B

18.5

16.0

L7.9

18.4

19.6

L7.S

18.0

t7.7.L-A

17.5

1?.8

r 5.6

17.3

14.9

t7.4

16.0

15.6

t9.2

17.7

15.5

17.0

16.9

16.5

16.3

IB'B

1?.5

r5.6

73.3

73.1

?8.1

73.7

12.r

?3.1172.5

7L.6

,t.r72.5

70.9

70.3

72.3

?1.5

72.5

?3.1

72.4

72.8

74.8

72.8

74.6

72.3

74.5

75.1

tr.r

72.0

74.2

72.2

74.8

t+-D

?1.0

73.0

74.8

3

4

IBH-160IH-173

IH-51Super

Select

Fundulea 55

Fundulea 56

Florom 305

Adalid-BArbumg 353

Sigco 448

Interstate 7111

CargiU 20?

Triumph 570

NS-FlowerNS-'Shine

trTS-Condor

NS-Helios

Iodinevalue

from this p-irint ôf vièW, ;but somd "fariationswere f,roticêd espêeiâilywith regafd to,the oleicand Ïi'nôIêi,d acids.

,, t ,.,,' ' ".:"' -'

CONCLUSIONS ':

The set of 34 sunflower cultivars testd inthe. ,fifth blennial cycle of international trialsdisplayed a great variation with respect : toenv-ironrnental qdaplability, yield genetic po-

"tential,'oil''content.'ànd quality, as' well as the

main rnoriiho-physiological trai{s" An importantnumber of hybrids exhibited .however a satis-factorytstability over a multitr-rde of locations,in ,both experimental years. Some hybridswere better dif'fererrtiated within limited arèasalloyi4.g farmers to id_entify the best locallya.dapted geriotypes. As compared to the pqe-vioùs biennial testing cycles, a significant ge-netic progress has been achieved in the im-provement of sunflower hybrids for resistanceto diseases, one of the main concern in sun-flower cultivation all over the world.

RÉSULTATS DU CNNQUIÈME CYCLED'ESSAIS INTERNATIONAUX

AVEC DES CULTIVARS DE TOURNESOL(1984-1985)

Résurné

Dans ce cycle expérimental biennal 30 hybridessimples et 3 hybrides à trois-voies aux provenanceset origines différentes ont été testés, à côté du cul-tivar à pollinisation libre Peredovik. Vingt institutsou stations de recherches d'Europe, ainsi que despays intéressés au développement de cette culture, deI'Amérique Centrale et du Nord, Amérique du Sud,Alrique et Asie, ont participé.

La diversité des conditions de milieu a déterminéune Iarge variation du rendement en graines, de lateneur en huile des graines et des autres caracté-ristiques agronomiques. Cependant, des génotypes au.comporternent supérieur en moyenne par localités etannées expérimentales peuvent être identifiés, ainsique des génotypes à réaction spécifique, significati-vement supérieure dans certaines zones géographi-ques.

Ayant en vue Ies performances des hybrides, parrapport au cultivar Peredovik, le témoin commun detous les cycles expérimentaux organisés jusqu'à pré-sent, on peut apprécier qu'une partie importante deshybrides étudiés dans ce cycle représentent des créa-tions supérieures à ceux antérieures, surtout à I'égardde la teneur en huile des graines, du degré d'auto-fertilité, de la résistance vis-à-vis de certaines mala-dies importantes et de Ia verse des plantes.

La variation similaire des valeurs enregistrées àIa plupart d'hybrides dans les différentes conditionsde milieu, suggère, toutefois, I'existence d'une diver-sité gététique assez limitée" et donc d'une vulnérabi-Iité génétique potentielle. Celle-ci est également in-désirable si I'on a en vue d'établir les structures d'hy-brides pour une certaine zone, ayant pour butd'assurer une meilleure stabilité de la récolte. Ainsi,il s'impose le développement continuel des travauxd'amélioration visant Ia diversification des bases gé-nétiques des hybrides de tournesol.

742.25

141.90

147.47

140,17

142.t6

141.90

l40r.0B

143.99

t4t.t2

140.?B

13s.47

140.95

140.60

141.56

143.13

141.13

l42.rB

140.34

142.95

143.65

139.81

140.08

142.00

139.83

140"09

143.90

143.21

139.30

141.64

143.13

11

Page 11: €¦ · RESUTTS OF THE TI{TERI{ATIONAI, TRIALS WITII STINFLOWBR CUI,.TIVARS (THE FIF"TH CYCTE 1e81,-1985) a minirmum of B0 plants per plot be har-vested. The recomrnended population

RESULTADOS DEL QT'INTO CICLO]. DE LAS CULTURAS COMPARATIVAS,

INTERNACIONALES CON CULTIVARESDE GIRASOIJ

(1984_1985)

Res{tmen

. Durante este ciclo experimental se testâron B0 hi-bridos simples y S hibridos trilineàriijs, de provênien-cia e origenes diferentes, junto a la variedad-pobla-ciôn de polinizaciôn libre Peredovik. Participaron 20institutos o estaciones de invesligaci.ones de Europa,asf como de los paises interesados en el desarrollo deèstâ culturâ de America Central y del Norte, Ame-rica del Sur, Africa y Asia.

La diversidad de las condiciones de medio deter-minô una variaci6n en limites muy amplias. de laproducciôn. de semillas y de los dernâs caracteristicasag,rônomicos. A.pesar. de esto, se pueden identificargenotipos con un comportamiento superior en lnediaFor localidades y aÉos experimentales, asf como ge-

notipos con una rsacci6n especffiea, significantementesuperior en ciertas zonas geogrâficas.

Teniendo eû cuenta las performancias de los hibri-dos comparando con la variedad Perèdovik, que fuetestigo comûn en todos los .ciclo$ experimentales or-ganizados hasta el presente, se puede apreciar queuna pârte notable de ldrs hibridos estudiados duranteeste ciclo representa creaciones superiores a los an-teriores, sobre todo en cuanto al contenido de aceitede las semillas, del grado de autofertilidad, de laresistencfa ,a ciertas enfermedades importantes y aIp caida de las plantas..

La variaciôn semejante de los valores registradosen la mayoria de los hibridos en diferentes condicio-nes de medio sugiere en cambio 1a existencia de unadiversidad genética bastante limitada y por lo con-siguientè , de

.una 'vulnerabilidad 'gehética potencial.Esta no es dèséable ni en. el caso.:cuando se. persigueestablecer las estrauturas de hjbridos para ciertazona, con la meta de asegurar una estabilidad mayorde la cosecha. Por Io consiguiente se va imponiendoa continuaciôn el desarrollo de los trabajos de mejoraque se refieren a la diversificaciôn de las bases gené-ticas de los hibridôs de girasol.

ri