retention of casnr undergraduate students brianna hitt, university of nebraska-lincoln

30
Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska- Lincoln

Upload: winfred-cameron

Post on 21-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students

Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Page 2: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Motivation Previous work

Enrollment predictions Model retention with financial data, all colleges

New Student Enrollment surveys Programming

How can CASNR better support students?

Page 3: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Data New Student Enrollment (NSE) survey Academic Management Information System

(AMIS) base_enrollment database Student demographics Academic information for each semester enrolled

Over 150 variables Linked by Student NUID through Microsoft®

Access®

Page 4: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

NSE variables Pre-professional programs Working on/off campus Weekly work hours Best subject Worst subject Concerns about college Number of activities Campus activities

Page 5: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Student Demographics Age Gender Ethnicity AP / CLEP credits ACT scores High school GPA High school class size High school class rank

Page 6: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Semester Academic Information Retention First-time freshman JD Edwards Honors program FERPA Resident status Veteran status Full-time

Total term credits High school

graduation Cumulative GPA Cumulative earned

hours Cumulative transfer

hours Transfer student Previous college

credits

Page 7: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Methods Means and proportions Kendall’s tau-b correlation Logistic regression

Stepwise selection Modeling semester retention Linear effects for all indicators

Scoring Used new students to check the model Predicted probabilities Confidence intervals Overall fit statistics

Page 8: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Fall 2013 Students

Page 9: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Retention from 2013 NSE to Fall 2013

Effect P-value Estimate Odds RatioIntercept .0001 3.8030Pre-health .0466 -1.5734 .207Planning to work off campus .0544 -1.2245 .294Best subject science .0275 1.4824 4.404Best subject writing .2038 1.0971 2.995Worst subject math .0204 -1.8362 .159Worst subject science .2633 1.2930 3.644Worst subject writing .1847 -1.0725 .342Worried about time management .1292 1.6874 5.405Worried about too large an environment .1901 1.0836 2.955Worried about making friends .0053 -1.8980 .150Planning to participate in Greek life .2962 0.8420 2.321Planning to participate in honors program .2451 -1.0816 .339

Page 10: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Retention from 2013 NSE to Fall 2013

Variables not included Pre-professional programs other than Pre-Health Planned weekly work hours

Page 11: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Retention from 2013 NSE to Spring 2014

Effect P-value Estimate Odds RatioIntercept .0001 2.2454Planning to work off campus .0057 -0.9832 .374

Variables included, then removed Full-time status

Variables not included Pre-professional

programs Planned weekly work

hours Best/worst subjects

Concerns about college

Activities Demographics Fall 2013 academic

information

Page 12: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Retention from 2013 NSE to Fall 2014

Effect P-value Estimate Odds RatioIntercept .0037 -6.0425Planning to work more than 15 hours .0057 -1.2398 0.289White ethnicity .0048 2.0606 7.850High school grad in the last 12 months (fall 2013) .0091 -2.0421 0.130

Previous college (fall 2013) .0015 1.3983 4.048Total term credit hours (spring 2014) .0051 0.3623 1.437Cumulative GPA (spring 2014) .0002 0.8522 2.345

Page 13: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Retention from 2013 NSE to Fall 2014 Variables included, then removed

Hawaiian/Pacific Islander ethnicity indicator

Variables not included Pre-professional

programs Planned location of

work Best/worst subjects Concerns about college Demographics Fall 2013 retention

Resident status Veteran status

Full-time status Cumulative GPA,

earned, and transfer hours from Fall 2013

All variables from Spring 2014 other than cumulative GPA

Page 14: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Fit Statistics for SCORE Data

Total Frequency

417 SC 210.3975

Log Likelihood

-65.9837 R-Square -0.07533

Error Rate 0.0312 Max-Rescaled R-Square

-0.34813

AIC 157.9673 AUC 0.517353

AICC 158.8706 Brier Score 0.032482

BIC 210.3975 Model built using Fall 2013 first-time freshman Used Fall 2014 first-time freshman to check the

model 3.12% error rate in predicting which students

retained

Retention from 2013 NSE to Fall 2013

Page 15: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for Student Not Retained

NR = Not Retained

Page 16: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for Majors

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388Agribusiness 0% 3.5% 3.4% 3.6% 3.1% 3.0% 10.3%Agricultural Journ. 6.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.8% 1.5% 1.5% 1.6%Animal Science 13.3% 8.6% 8.5% 8.2% 8.4% 8.3% 13.9%Biochemistry 13.3% 6.9% 6.8% 5.5% 5.3% 5.3% 4.4%

Less likely to major in Agribusiness or Animal Science

More likely to major in Agricultural Journalism or Biochemistry (first fall only)

Page 17: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for Majors

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388Env. Studies 6.7% 6.9% 6.8% 5.5% 4.6% 4.6% 3.1%Forensic Sci. 13.3% 17.2% 17.0

%14.6% 16.0% 15.9

%

9.3%

Fish & Wildlife 6.7% 12.1% 11.9%

10.9% 9.2% 9.1% 5.7%

Pre-Vet Med. 13.3% 17.2% 17.0%

15.5% 16.0% 15.9%

13.7%

Vet Science 6.7% 8.6% 8.5% 8.2% 8.4% 8.3% 5.7% More likely to major in Environmental Studies,

Forensic Science, Fisheries and Wildlife, Pre-Veterinary Medicine, or Veterinary Science

Page 18: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for NSE

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388Pre-health 20.0% 10.3% 10.1

%11.8% 11.5% 11.4

%

7.0%

Off-campus work 40.0% 34.5% 35.6%

30.0% 20.0% 28.8%

19.3%

On-campus work 20.0% 29.3% 28.8%

35.5% 35.1% 35.6% 35.8%

Future work 33.3% 27.6% 27.1%

25.5% 28.2% 28.0%

33.8% More likely to plan on Pre-Health More likely to plan to work off-campus Less likely to plan to work on-campus (first

year only) Less likely to plan to work in the future

Page 19: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for NSE

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 38815+ hours 20.0% 24.1% 23.7

%28.2% 27.5% 27.3

%

17.8%

Not working 6.7% 10.3% 10.2% 10.0% 8.4% 8.3% 11.1%Future work hours

26.7% 24.1% 23.7%

21.8% 24.4% 24.2%

31.2%

More likely to plan to work more than 15 hours Less likely to plan not to work (first fall only) Less likely to plan to work future hours

Page 20: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for NSE

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388Good math 46.7% 36.2% 37.3

%38.2% 40.5% 40.2

%

49.2%

Good science 53.3% 65.5% 64.6% 68.2% 67.9% 68.2% 68.0%Good writing 20.0% 29.3% 28.8% 28.2% 29.8% 29.5% 29.1%

Less likely to consider math their best subject Less likely to consider science or writing their

best subject (first fall only)

Page 21: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for NSE

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388Bad math 53.3% 53.4% 52.5

%53.6% 50.4% 50.8

%

44.3%

Bad science 6.7% 10.3% 10.2% 11.8% 11.5% 11.4% 14.9%Bad writing 53.3% 41.4% 42.4% 39.1% 39.7% 40.2% 43.8%

More likely to consider math their worst subject Less likely to consider science their worst subject More likely to consider writing their worst subject

(first fall only)

Page 22: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for NSE

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388Worried about doing well

33.3% 55.2% 54.2%

50.9% 50.4% 50.8%

44.8%

…paying for college

46.7% 43.1% 44.1%

47.3% 45.8% 45.5%

36.9%

Less likely to be worried about doing well (first fall only)

More likely to be worried about doing well (after first fall)

More likely to be worried about paying for college

Page 23: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for NSEQuestion NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388…managing time

6.7% 25.9% 25.4% 26.4% 24.4% 25.00% 24.5%

…finding help 33.3% 20.7% 20.3% 19.1% 21.4% 21.2% 25.8%…larger environment

13.3% 13.8%% 15.3%

15.5% 16.0% 15.9%

22.4%

…making friends

33.3% 12.1% 11.9% 9.1% 10.7% 10.6% 11.3%

Less likely to be worried about managing time (first fall only)

More likely to be worried about finding help, making friends (first fall only)

Less likely to be worried about college being too big

Page 24: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for NSE

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388Greek life 13.3% 29.3% 28.8% 26.4% 28.4% 28.0% 28.1%No activities 33.3% 36.2% 35.6

%32.7% 29.8% 30.0

%

24.5%

Athletics 6.7% 10.3% 10.2%

9.1% 8.4% 8.3% 4.6%

Less likely to plan to participate in Greek life (first fall only)

More likely to plan not to participate in activities

More likely to plan to participate in athletics

Page 25: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for Demographics

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388Black 6.8% 6.7% 6.2% 5.9% 5.9% 2.1%Hispanic 11.4% 13.3

%11.3% 9.3% 9.2% 7.0%

White 90.9% 88.9%

86.6% 88.1% 88.2%

94.1%

Multi-racial 13.6% 13.3%

11.3% 9.3% 9.2% 8.0%

More likely to be Black or Hispanic Less likely to be white/Caucasian More likely to be multi-racial (first year only)

Page 26: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for Demographics

Question NR Fall 1 NR Spring 1 NR FS 1 NR Fall 2 NR Spring 2 NR FS 2 OverallNumber 15 58 59 110 131 132 388High school class size

234.41 240.80

265.46

251.58 250.57

190.38

High school rank

83.64 87.16 87.39 85.06 85.13 56.54

Larger high school classes (by about 50 students)

Lower high school class rank (by about 30 students)

Page 27: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Shared Characteristics for Academics

Students NR after the first fall semester: Were less likely to be in the Honors program Were more likely to have graduated in the past

12 months Had fewer cumulative earned hours on average Had fewer cumulative transfer hours in the

second year Were less likely to have had previous college

experience

Page 28: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Future Work Enrollment predictions More and different data Checking accuracy of other models Trends in class size and majors Investigate students without NSE data

Did not attend Attended with different plans

Compare Fall 2013 and Fall 2014 students Combine to look at trends

Page 29: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Acknowledgements Dr. Erin Blankenship – MS Advisor

Dr. Stephen Kachman – MS Committee Member

Dr. Tiffany Heng-Moss - Associate Dean of CASNR, MS Committee Member

Dr. Steven Waller - Dean of CASNR

Vanessa Roof - Inst. Retention and Assessment Research Analyst, Academic Affairs

Judy Carter - Programmer Analyst, IANR Finance & Personnel

Traci Kaslon - Inst. Research Analyst, Office of Inst. Research and Planning

Dr. Pamela Fellers Section on Statistical Education

Page 30: Retention of CASNR Undergraduate Students Brianna Hitt, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Contact Information Brianna Hitt University of Nebraska-Lincoln [email protected]