~Jto Tel~phonG No. : +91~172..263e994 Fax No. : +91-172-2638135

!,,~ ~'" t1 qrli ~ \\lllf , 24 ~-31V.

3"l1'tl ..... 160030

qmi!f~OI, ~ d'm"l1I, qfl'et(l\;'i· "llllfq\l1 Northern R nalOfflco GOVEiRNMEiNTOFINOIA BaYlll No. 24 ­ 31 A,

MINISTRY OF EN.vI~ONMi~NT,FOFH!$T CLIMATECHANGli

& Dakshln Marg, Ch -160030 Iii-mall: chdmoefen all.com

aJay.mehrotra13@gov.ln

~: 4.8112004·RO (NZ)/ ( '10 i-­ ~: 13.11.2017

>ITa,

"fl~q,~, (~e;rur ~), qt4 ~ {OI, Cf'1' "Q;tt '*.'1 ClI9; qftCl tT"1 ti $1H?1 ~ ,

~ q'llfc:Hol "'TCff, ~ ifllT~, ~,

~ ~ - 110003

fcr1sr1:- 1. Expansion ofPanipat Refinery (from 12 MMTPA to 15 ]YlMTPA) by MIs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. at village - BaJjatan, Distt. ~ Panipat, Haryana.

2. Integrated Paraxylene and Purified Terephthalic Acid Projects at Pan ipa t by Mis Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. at village - Baljatan, Distt. ~ Panipat, Haryana ~ Certification of compliance reg.

*~f: 1. J-11011 /7/2004~IA 1I(l) dated 09.08.2004 2. J~11011/52/2000~IA It dated 30.04.2001 Amended dated 20.01.2003

'5q~\ICf('j ~fu ~ et *...f 'it -acRf QRlll'Jl"11 cnT qllfcHon~ 1ftiCOCfll oi "B ~

~ ~ ~ wit et a:t:Jql<1"1 "Q;tt certification of compliance et f9~~II:J~m,

~lij"UT l'lRl~~"1 (4OlTR2RJ I RtM) ~ IDU ~ ~ ~ ~ I

l'lRlf<:1N:- Sh. H.V. Farkya, DGM (HS&E), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Panipat Refinery, P.O.- Panipat Refiner, Panipat - 132 140, for information.

'8(1I~ChI{

48

Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change

Northern Regioni!HQfflce, Chandigarh.. 16QO~O

MON ITORI~G.REPORT

PART~.1 DATA SHEET

'T~"'*'- '.~p roJectfy'p'e~-""~'-"""~,*""'-""~""~'-"""-''-""1hd~q$"tFy'TR(;fln'ery) _"""~'~;~,*__'...•."._WA_'W" __,*'-:_ww,~_

2. ",*-,wNa'me'oTtl,eProje(i'--'~""-~"-'-'--"""'--',*"w, l~"ix'~ansrQn'--'oTw'PanTPit"Refrnery-'~'(fro'm~l r MMTPA to 15 MMTPA) byM/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. at village -Baljatan, Distt. ~ Panipat, Haryana.

2. Int~grated Paraxyleneand. Purified Terephthalic Acid Projects at Panlpa t byM/s Indian Oil CorporatiQnLtd•. at village ...

_._~~_.-.. .. ~,_._,_,-,.~-~... __.",._.. . _"_.._.",_,,_,§,iW~!!l,],istt.- ,panje~1H<!C4M~". "._'-_,~, 3. Clearance letter (5)/ O.M No. & dates J. J-llOll/7/2004-IA 11(1) datedQ9,08.20p4

2. J-l1011/52/2000-IA II dated30.04.2001and ...._._--I-_",,,,_,__~__,~,,,,_,_,,.,_..__,,_,__,~_~ ..j_~a;;,.,;,,;m~en:.:..:d=e~d,;;;..d~ted 20.0~.)OO~,_ ._~_,~_~__

4. I "

a) District (5) Panipat b) State (s) Haryana c) Latitudes/Longitudes 29°29'17" N / 76°52'3.2" E

AddFess1orcPrre's'pondence~~-~-'--"""-" -",,'---'-'--------.-.~~--"""_.. -.. -.--,-._.,-­5

a) Address of Concerned Project Chief Engineer (with Pin Code/ Tel No./ Telex/Fax NO./E-mail address)

b) Address of Executive Project Engineer/Manager (with Pin Code/ Tel

l__--t---:::-;-:-N.__o-c-./-;:-T;....:;,..elex/Fax No./E-mail address) 6. Salient features

a) of the project

b) of the environmental management plans

Shri H. V. Farkya, GM (HS&E) Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Project Building Panipat Refinery/ Panipat - 132140/ Haryana

Tel. No. 0180-2524525 Fax No. 0180-2578833 E-mail: farkyahv@indianoil.in

Same as above

This plant will refine 15MMT crude per annum. Also petrochemical complex for production of Paraxylene (350/000 TPA) and PTA (525/000 TPA). Submitted with EIA report.

7.

8.

Break-up of the project area a. Submergence area: Forest and

Non forest b, Others

Break-up of project affected population

In the existing complex.

NA

9, Financial details:

a) Project cost as originally planned and subsequent revised estimates and the year of price reference

Revised: Rs. 27958 Crore (FY 2015-16)

Panipat Refinery JOCL 29,6.17

- -

- -

- -

11

Around Rs. 225 Crore; b) Allocations made for environmel1tal managernent plans with item wise

and year wise breal< up

13.1% (Original)c) Benefit cost ratio/internal rate of returr\ and the year of assessment

Yesd) Whether (c) Includes the cost of envi, management as shown in b) above

Rs. 27958 Cronae) Actual expenditure incurred on the project 50 far

f) Actual expenditure incurred on the Included in the above environmental management plans so far

~;-~",,""'~~".:~ FOr'est'lal1rrequTrem ent-'·'---·~--~._",. NA10.

Th statu )f :1, I' felling il Ilull"for'e5t 'f\JA areas

--~~""= 12. Status of construction:

a) Date of commencement (actual and/or planned) to 15 MMTPA) construction activities

commenced in September 2004

b) Date of completion (actual and/or October 2006 planned)

"~===-..".,..~-

NA to start

Reaso'ns for thedefa"V,lf theprOjectls yet 13.

-"'''--~-- oates of site 'visits

a) Date of previous site visit (EC 2004):

14. 19.02.2013

Date of previous site visit (EC 2001): 23.02.2004, 12-13.09.2006 29.06.2017b) Date of present site visit:

List of participants:

a) From M/s IOCl, Panipat

15. Shri H. V. Farkya, GM (HS&E); Shri Ajay Kumar, DGM,

b) From NRO, MoEFCC, Chandigarh:- As below Authorities for obtaining act on plans/information on status of compliance to safeguards other than the routine letters for logistic support for site visits). (The first monitoring report may contain the details of all the letters issued so far, but the later reports may cover only the letter issued subsequently)

Date Letter from RO

Details of correspondence with project16.

Date

As per EC No. J-ll0ll/7/2004-IA 11(1) dated 09.08.2004 (hereafter, EC 2004)

26.07.13 Action taken report on observations (of the -last monitoring) was requested,

, - 22.07.13

22.01.14

14.01.15

Project (expansion of Refinery From 12 MMTPA

.-

Dr. Vimal Kumar Hatwal, Joint Director (S) ",- ­

Reply from PA

-

Compo without analytical data submitted.

Camp. without analytical data SUbmitted.

Compo without analytical data sUbmitte~

Panipot Refinery IOCL 29.6.17 2

05

1.11.12

21.07.05

25.02.11

Comp., Various consents,

Six mAht'hl\l compo report req.

point-wise

Six monthly compo report req.

compo

compo with ::lh~ll\/tlr:l1

compo with :>n".h/t'lr:>1

Panipat Refinery IOCL 29.6.17 3

PART-II STATUS OF COMPLIANCE

It PART-III

DETAILeD MONITORING RepORT .... . J-l1011/7/aq04..IA " (I) dated 09.08.2Q04

J..11011/S2/2000.. IA II dated 80.04.2001 and Amended dated 20.01.2008

The earlier report was submitted to the Ministry vide letter no 4-81/2004 ... RO (NZ)/291·292 dated 14.07.2017, In view of mInutes of the EAC (Industry) meeting held on .12-13,10.2017, committee has sought report on EC pertaining to Paraxylene and Purified Terephthalic Acid Project, which was not referred by PI' while seeking certification from RO, Chandlgarh,

Mis 10CL Panipat was granted ECs for Integrated Paraxylene and PUrlfi~d Terephthallc Acid Project and Expansion of Refinery (from 12 MMTPA to 1S MMTPA) in 2001 and 2004, respectively. In the following pages, compliance status of both the projects has been reviewed. The common conditions or conditions of similar nature are dealt together and references of ECs were provided simultaneously. Repetition of conditions has been avoided, Conditions which were not covered In joint reporting of compliance have been dealt under prevailing EC separately.

Specific Conditions (EC 2004)

(I) The company shall ensure strict implementation I compliance to the

Being Compiled. It was observed that the conditions laid down in EC dated 09.04.2001

stIpulations made by MOEF vide OM no. J~ are being compiled. ll001/6012000-IA-1I dated 9th April, 2001 for expansion of Panipat Refinery from 6 MMTPA to 12 MMTPA

(ii) The gaseous emissions (S02, NOx and HC, Being Compiled (ECs 2004 & 2001). Emission Benzene) from the various process units from the stacks is being monitored online and should conform to the standards prescribed also from Haryana Test House on quarterly under Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 basis. 45 nos. of stacks are online connected or norms stipulated by the SPCB whichever is with parameters such as SOx, NOx, CO, PM, more stringent. At no time, the emission Gaseous emission from various process units level should go beyond the stipulated meets the prescribed standards, standards. In the event of failure pollution control system(s) adopted by the unit, the respective unit should not be restarted until the control measures are rectified to achieve the desired efficiency.

(ill) Adequate ambient air quality monitoring Being Complied (ECs 2004 & 2001). It was stations, (SPM, S02, NOx and HC, Benzene) observed that total 8 nos. of Continuous should be set up in the refinery complex in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations ­consultation with SPCB, based on occurrence CAAQMS (2 in Panipat city, 1 in Refinery of maximum ground level concentration and township, 3 in Refinery and 2 in Panipat down-wind direction of wind. The monitoring Naphtha Cracker and polishing pond area) are network must be decided based on modeling in operation. These were set up in consultation exercise to represent short term GLCs with HSPCB. Also, one mobile van for ambient Continuous on-line stack monitoring air quality monitoring was in place. For all equipment should be installed for major stacks (45 nos.) S02, NOx analyzers are measurement of S02 and NOx. Data on VOC available and linked with CPCB server. Fugitive should be monitored and submitted to the emission monitoring for hydrocarbon and

Panipat Refinery 10eL 29.6.17 4

benzene is being done regularly through approved ry1oEF/HSPCB approved agency"I ..·

SPCS / Ministry,

~~._w...w."I w"_'~"'""W'"'''''''''''' WWWW''_''''''''' '_"""M",_",~"_--:,~",,,,,w,,_,_",_w,,,w'llwliU It!!y.gJ~_gw~~~_.w_.~",~ __~_." ..~._..

w(:')'_"'_ The comp-a;;ysha"a~';i~rethatthe total Being cohr6fie,r(iCS200i'& 200:l).I{was"

(iv) Fugitive emission of HC from ~'VUU~l storage Belhi Corn~ned (ECs 2004. &2001). Fugitiye tank yard/ crude oil tahl<s etc,must pe emissionll1onitoring for. hydrocarbonapd regularly monitored, Sensors for detecting benzene forproduct storage tankSl;lnd crude 011 He leakage should also be provided at storage tanks is being done through Hary~na

strategic locations. Test House on quarterly basis. Furthermore/

750 hydr(jcarbon detectors..• 'and 237H~$ detector havE) been provided at strategic

lOCations. w

S02 emissions from the Panipat Refinery submitted by the PA that total 502 emission of after expansion shall not exceed I.e. 1000 Pl;lnipat Refin~ry remains in the rangepf. 900­kg/hr. The company shall install an additional 1()00 kg/hr. Qnthe contrary/ as per sUPOOitted Sulphur Recovery Unit (225 MT/day capacity) data/ it was found marginally higher than the with 99.9% efficiency and th~ ~ntire gas 1000 kg/hrfo( March 2017. PA Wc;l$ directed to generated should be amine treated to reduce take corrective (lction to bring the em.i?sidM the S02 emissions level from the Refinery. level below the pr~scribed standard.Furth~r,

PA informed that 5th SHU having a cap~9}tyof

225 MT/daywith design efficiency of 99.9% has been installed recently and currently is in operation. With this/ Panipat Refinery hClS5 nos, Sulphur Recovery Units (SRU) as detailed below:

• 2x115 MT/day capacity (99 % efficiency)

~ ~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~·~3~X~5MT~ycapac~Y(99.9%efficien~ EC 2004: As per the commitment given/ there Being Complied (ECs 2004 & 2001). It was should be zero effluent discharge due to the submitted that there is no discharge of treated proposed expansion. The company should effluent from Refinery into Thirana drain. ETP-l ensure that there will be no discharge of & ETP-2 treated effluent meets Minimum treated effluent into Thirana Drain and the National Standards. These treated effluent are treated effluent from the refinery is not completely re-used as a feed to RO plant and as discharged along with the treated' effluent a makeup to cooling towers. Further/ a part of from PX-PTA plant. The entire treated waste PTA-ETP treated effluent re-used as a makeup water should be recycled for reuse in the to Cooling Towers. The balance is being used plant operation and greenbelt development for irrigation in greenbelts. The treated effluent so as to maintain zero discharge, Further/ quality of all above three ETPs meets the load the liquid effluent generated from the based standards and concentration limits. It Refinery should be treated comprehensively was informed by the PA that PTA-ETP has 5 to conform to the load based standards and stage treatment including Aerobic and concentration limits prescribed under Anaerobic systems for effluent treatment. Data Environment (Protection) Act/ 1986 Rules. (Years 2016-17) submitted to this office

indicates that BOD of treated effluent was EC 2001: liqUid effluent generated from the below 30 mg/litre. petrochemical complex should be treated comprehensively to conform to the load based standards and concentration limits prescribed under EPA rules (MINAS standards), The BOD of the treated effluent should not exceed 30 mg/I at any point of

(vi)

5 Panipat Refinery JOCL 29.6.17

time. The Company must undertake maximum recycling/ reusing of the treated effluent for process purposes in addition to green belt development and also adopt adequate water cohServation measures. As per the commitment Siven the total quahtity of treated effluent discharged into Thirana drain should not exceed 255 m3/hr. The effluent quality at the discharge poil'lt ml)st also be monitOred periodically by an independent agency authorized by CPCB and report of the independent agency should be submitted to Ministry's Regional office at Chandigarh/CPCB/ HSPCB. -rhe company shall fully abide by the Hon'ple Supreme Court orders on regulation of industrial discharge to River Yamuna andit's can('lls /drains.

~-(~ii')'~~~Th~·IOCC'M~~h'all-'en;ure~~ra~-;TBeingcompli~d. Flowmeters were In;talledar

continuous flow measurement devices so the tim.e Of setting up PTA~ETP. A part of PTA~

that only the permitted quantity of treated ETP treated effluent is b¢ing re~used as a effluent from PK·PTA plant (255 m3/hr) is makeup to cooling towers. Remaining is beihg discharged. Further, jOel shall make all used for irrigation in greenbelts. efforts to recycle and reuse the treated effluent from PX·PTA plant after commencing of the unit.

(viii) Additional water reqUirement shall not Being Complied. Discrepancy was noticed from exceed 400 m3/hr. The total quantity of the records in the quantity of fresh water effluent generation should not exceed 1280 consumption. It is submitted that presently m3/hr as indicated in the Environment fresh water consumption of the Refin~ry is Management Plan. The treated effluent 1800~1950 m3/hr and total effluent generation should be reused/ recycled to achieve zero remains less than 1100 m3/hr. On the contrary, discharge. as per submitted record, total 2545 m3/hr of

fresh water is being used. However, PA has submitted that total allowable withdrawal of fresh water as per previous EC was 3000 m3/hr, which was further added by 400 m3/hr. Overall total allowable water quantity is 3400 m3/hr. PA was directed to clarify the matter before EAC during presentation.

(Ix) EC 2004: Greenbelt of adequate width and Being Complied (EC 2004 & 2001). It was density should be provided to mitigate the observed that the greenbelt of adequate width effects of fugitive emissions all around the and density has been developed in consultation plant. The bio-sludge from the ETP should be with District Forest Department. Further, it was used as manure in the greenbelt submitted by the PA that: development. Company shall develop - As on March 2017, a Greenbelt having more greenbelt in consultation with DFO as per than 5 lacks surviving trees has been CPCB gUidelines. developed since 1998. Out of these, 1016

trees were planted in year FY 2016~17.

EC 2001: The company shall develop green . Total area under greenbelt is 395 Hectare belt in an area of 75 acres as per the original including area of Eco~park of 127.80 hectare plan in the PX/PTA project area. and other plantation zones in township,

Panipat Refinery IOCL 29.6.17 6

__

"~"~,'.=,..,v-~"""'="'".''m"'''''"~< .. ,,,w~'d,"='Xc>k''''=_~''"''~'=;''''' k.,;.c~>"""'-""''''"'''''" __'''''--~kk";. __ __ ·''''''~''''-'''~'wi''~~ _"", .. w,,,u,,=,_.~m="""""_'>*<"_'ff,,,,,,,,,,_ ,_.-- :·~~_~.7"''''''~'''''·_~·~"''"'''~,",-~"""".~,-,<,,,,,~v='''=''"'''''Ii.·.'Y~.'·#;,.h'''""'''''',~''·'';',,*''''''''~~k_~:==h.'''''''·'''~·'''''·''' ..·""WM>*,,,,=~_">,p"""de~,,_" -­

roadsldeg"plant areas. (x)-~~$~ ""Tr1'eToCL'"sh'a'f1'~nak;'"e'ffo'rtsto-;elrp'e'troreum'" c~i\;lng'com.P1Te<Clt'waslnfOrm'~d"bY~A th.at-'

coke (0.9 MMTPA) to organized inoustries having consent from the concerned State Pollution. Control Board. rlJrther, the Pet-coke from the Delayed Coker Unit should be conveyed to storage area by pipe conveyer system. The company should (~ncsure to prevent seepage in Pet~cok$ stockpile / storage area to prevent soli and ground

Petfflcoke.is being sold by the separate IOCL Division (Marketing). It was further/submitted that total .pet~cokediSP$tched .', through marketing diVision was 890989.450 MT against the 918889.000 MT produced by Panipat Refinery duril1g FY 2016~17.

I~~'~~_'~'~"'~~"!~ .PQ!L~,!L'?!L_'_"'_"~"~_i8AA'A"A"A'~A">W"A AA'~'Al'"A'%'_'_'W_" __W~A%A'_""'_'A_A A,A_··,·····_·····_·_IAAA_"A"AC_A'_'

(Xi) The oily sludge generated from the refinery operation should be subjected to melting pit treatment for recovery of oil. Arhe recovered oil should be recycled. The reSidual oily sludge should be disposed off in the HDPE lined pits.

~'"A"'_~__'-"A_"_AAA'_"'__'_~~'_ .. -',.._._.__..~.'. The company should adopt mounded storage for LPG. The project authorities shall also comply with all the environmental protection measures and safeguards recommended in the EIA/EMP and risk analysis report.

(xli)

Occupational Health Surveillance of the workers should done on a regular basis and records maintained as per the Factories Act.

(xiii)

Guard ponds of sufficient holding capacity should be provided to contain the effluent during process disturbances and or ETP failure. The concerned units must be shut down in cases of effluent quality exceeding the prescribed limits.

(v)

General Conditions (EC 2004)

lei Complied. It was submitted that the raw oily sludge generated from the Refinery is subjected to Melting Pit treatment for recovery of Oil. "the recovered oil is recycled back with crude oil for processing. Further, followih~

steps are being used for the treatment and disposal of the sludge:

A The residual sludge is disposed off through Bio-remediation.

- Part of the sludge is processed in Coker unit.

• There are 4 nos. lined pits available for

storing residua I oily sl~~ ',,"A_'~_ Being Complied. It was observed that 4 Mounted Bullets (total capacity of 11492 m 3)

for LPG are in operation. Thus/ condition is considered as Complied for the present visit.

Being Complied (EC 2004 & 2001). Around 2300 workers are currently working in the Refinery. It was observed that the Refinery has a full'-fledged Occupational Health Centre (OHC) in operation. The OHC carries out health surveillance of the workers on a regular basis and records are being maintained.

Specific Conditions (EC 2001)

Being Complied. It was observed that the conditions laid down in EC dated 09.04.2001 are being complied.

(i) The project authorities must strictly adhere to the stipulations made by the Haryana State Pollution Control Board and the State

l\Ioted and Agreed by the PA as submitted (ECs 2004 & 2001). Consent to Operate under Water and Air Act has been renewed, which is valid

Panipat Refinery IOCL 29.6.17 7

(il) In the by the PA as submitted (ECs

plant should be carried out without prior approval of the MinIstry of Elwlronment & Forests,

='"~,,~~",w==~ _~W~~~WW<""~~"""'"'~'''''~~~''''~ ~-=~~'''~''"'''''V~''''&4''~V'\>o; 'A""":~--'&l')I;<"*~W'N~:*,*:0Wp~~'~7~~'~'~'"0C.""~Y"'W~"~~~-~~~"\''"=W~i<e"~»~'$=_~~___ ;'Y0~*W4~*~~~~~'~"~~4MW-C~

(iii) At no time/ the emissions should go beyond Noted and Agreed by the PA as 5ubmitte.d. the prescribed stalldards, In the event of failure of any pOIlUt!Otl control system adopted by the units/the respective unit should be immediately put out of operation and should not be restarted until the desired

_..~~~~..~ ~~9ien cy h.~._~~ ~h ieveq:._._~.w •._._.w•.~..~_+ ~._w~..". ~__ ~w_'_" "_;"';"_~_' '.~I (Iv) The overall noise levels in and around plant Being (ECs 2004 & 2001). It was

area should be kept well withih the standards submitted that the Refinery has provided (85 dBA) by providing noise control meaSures silehcerS on compressor discharge, acoustic including acoustic hoods, Silencers, leggings on turbo generators & ejector and enclosures etc. on all sources of noise acoustic chambers at the burners. Ambient air generation, The ambient noise levels should and .noise level monitoring is being carri~dp!Jt

conform to the standards prescribed under at project sIte quarterly, Copy of latest reports EPA Rules, 1989 viz 75 dBA (day time) and 70 show para~eters within limitS. "rhus, condition

I--~"----l d13A (night time). . . .. . .~~ _is £.~nsid~_£fL~led}0~..!hepresentsY1~t_ (v) EC 2004: The project authorities must strictly Being Complied (~Cs 2004 & 2001). PA

comply with the provisions made in informed that they have developed a secured Manufacture, Storage and Import of land fill (SLF) site within the premises. Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989 as Approximately 200 MT HW sent to SLF in FY amended in 2000 for handling of hazardous 2016-2017, as submitted by the PA. PA was chemicals etc. Necessary approvals from directed to submit the details of the same along Chief Controller of Explosives must be with the compliance report from now on. obtained before commission of the project. Further, renewal of authorization for Hazardous

Wastes from HSPCB has been obtained, which EC 2001: Handling, manufacturing, storage is valid upto 30.09.2021. and transportation of hazardous chemicals should be carried out in accordance with the Manufacture, Storage & Import of Hazardous chemicals Rules, 1989, as amended in 1991. Permissions from State and Central nodal agencies in this regard must be obtained.

(Vi) EC 2004: The project authorities must strictly Being Complied. Authorization for operating a comply with the rules and regulations with facility for collection, reception, treatment, regard to handling and disposal of hazardous storage, transportation and disposal of wastes in accordance with the Hazardous hazardous wastes has been obtained from Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, HSPCB which is valid upto 30.09.2021. Copy of 2003. Authorization from the State Pollution the same has been submitted to the this office. Control Board must be obtained for collections I treatment I storage I disposal of hazardous waste.

EC 2001: Hazardous wastes, if any, must be handled and disposed as per Hazardous waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989. Authorization from State Pollution

8 Panipat Refinery IOCL 29.6.17

Control Board in this 'l::lStll U must be .' obtained.

Nil)""" #"Th e prdT;;i"au't'h orities'wll1prbvi(r~e<ruit(t' "iierni"c~m~PIled:-rrwa~or-nt~~.tT;at- ad~q Uate" funds both recurring ancl non~recurrlng to funds (arou~d Rs,225~rore) have been implement the. conditions stipulated bV the pr()vig~dtoimpletnent conclltIOnS$tlpulated~y Ministry of Environment ancl Forests as well the MoEFCC. However, detailsonre,currlngand as the State. Government along with the non-recurring funds Were notprovid~d, PA has implementation schedule for all the been asked to Inform the Physical and financial conditions stipulated herein. The. funds sO progtess~fthe implelTle~t<~tibJfofE~ylron~eht provided should not be diverted for any Management Plans in the following proforma:~

other purposes.

,-"-'r'~·'-~-';---'-·'4---~-'''-'-~''" ,---.. .,-,~._._.. ,S Items Expenditure Proposed N. details till budget

date (In Rs.) estimates for ne~ttwo years

____,~ o,.jln~~'":'":~__ Recur Non- Recur Non-ring recur rhlg Recurri

f-,--+"w_,-~",,"~~--,,-j,~,- -!lng ~_~.~. ~n8 _'"~_ a. Air Pollution

Control Measures

b. Water Pollution Control

c. Noise Pollution control

___lwmm~ea::.:.s~ur.:;.es~--jI__-i 11­ ~ _

I~ Monitoring e. Rain Water __barvesting ----._. ­

f. Greenbelt g. Fire

Management

h. Miscellaneous

__+- . Total _ __L__.L__.....L____Lj-j"J.._..L-__....:..::.~.L_

EC 2004: The stipulated conditions will be Being Complied (EC 2004). Six monthly monitored by the Regional of this Ministry at compliance report is being submitted regularly Chandigarh / Central Pollution Control Board. by the PA, however without Monitoring data. A six monthly compliance report and the PA was directed to submit the same along with monitored data should be submitted to them the six monthly compliance report from now regularly. on.

(viii)

EC 2001: The implementation of the project Not Complied (EC 2001). Six monthly vis-a-vis environmental action plans will be compliance status report for this specific monitored by Ministry's Regional Office at project are not being submitted regularly, as Chandigarh/ State Pollution Control Board/ evident from point no. 16 of data sheet for EC Central Pollution Control Board. A six 2001. PA was directed to submit the same from monthly compliance status report should be now on. submitted to monitoringagencies.

Panipat Refinery IOCL 29.6.17 9

Six monthly status reports on the project vis~ a-vis environmental measures should be submitted to this Ministry (Regional Office, Chandigarh/ CPCB/SpeS,

1'.'.('4i'x"')"""'·'4;j';IF"iool:'·"'Th;"'Y"proJ~'tt'~Prbp'o ne nt·Y's'h6'u'itf'i-e'T~i··.···compile'(r (Ec.'IOol):.·.• fi:;ey-ehvlron'm~nt inform the public that the project has oEi}eo clearance for the project namely Sutene~l has accorded envlrot1mental clearance by the bl;)en advertised in newspapers namely IThe Ministry and copies of the clearance letter Indian Expressl and ITheSunday Tribune' on are available with the State Pollution COlifrol 14th and 15th of August, res~ectIvely. The clause Board / Committee and may also be seen at of 'within the 7 days' is also followed. Website of the Ministry of Environment and Forests at !lttl2:LLwwwLenvfpr,nic,ih, This should be advertised within seven days from the date of issue of the clearance letter at least in two local newspapers that arawidely circulated in the region of which one shall be in the vernacular language of the locality concerned and a copy of the same should be forwarded to the Regional Office.

EC 2001: The project proponent should Being Complied (~C 2(01): ThePAhas advertise in at least two local newspaper submitted the copies of advertisements widely circulated in the region around the published in newspapers namely 'The Ihdian project, one of which shall be in the Express' and 13f<J1{ ~ on Stll of May, 2001. vernacular language of the locality concerned informing that the project has been accorded environmental clearances by the Ministry and copies of the clearance letter are available. with the State Pollution Control Board/ Committee and may also be seen at Website of the Ministry and Forests at http://www.envfor.nic.in

(x) The project authorities should inform the Being Complied (ECs 2004 & 2001). The date of Regional Office as well as the Ministry, the financial closure of the project is 31st March of date of financial closure and final approval of every year. the project by the concerned authorities and the date of commencing the land development work.

General Conditions (EC 2001)

7. Adequate ..

for infrastructu reprovIsions facilities such as water supply, fuel, sanitation etc. should be ensured for construction workers during the construction phase so as to avoid felling of trees and pollution of water and the surroundings.

Being Complied. Since the project is completed, condition is considered as complied.

10. The project proponent shall also comply with all the environmental protection measures and safeguards recommended in the EIA/EIVIP and risk analysis report.

Noted and Agreed by the PA as submitted.

Panipat Refinery IOCL 29.6.17 10

1

1'1. The PP should have a scheme social Being was that the upliftment in the surrounding villages with social upliftment and community development reference to contribution in road has been properlytaRen .•. care .as pet IOeL's construction, education of children festivals, CorpQrateSociaI Responsibility Poli,cy,PA was health centers, sanitation faCilities, drinking directed to submit the details of CSH activities water supply, commUnity awarMess aM to this office. employment to local people especially the displaced people whenever and Wherever possible both for technical and non~technical

12. A separate environmenta management cellddB'efniComplred~-Jr'-;~~pdadrateenVironmerrta(~ with full fledged laboratory facilities to carry management cell in place under the control of out various management and monitoring GM (HS&E), 10eL Panipat.

functions should be set up under the control of senior executive.

'_d~'d_'I_'_.. ,_',~, ' __ .. ~~"'_,,','_', ,--"~,--~"~"--~-,--"',',"--d-----,"'~,__d'd~_dd '__,_'_"_"d" ,~,~"_, "",j

The company must obtain 150·14000 Being Copy of certificate has been certification within a time frame of .5 years or submitted to this office.

____so after the commissionln~.:..-" ._.~.~-t-_

13.

14. The funds earmarked for the environmental Not Complied.f>A assured that this condition is protection measures should not be diverted being complied.. H,p~everl .copy year-0Ilse for any other purpose and yeat~wise expenditure has not JjElen submitted yet to this expenditure should be submitted to this office as per stipulated condition. Thus; Ministry (RO, Chandigarh/CPCB/SPCB). condition is considered as not complied for the

Conditions (Amendment EC No. J-ll011/52/2000~IA II (I) dated 20.01.2003)

iii. The project authorities shall also comply with Noted and Agreed by the PA as submitted. all the environmental protection measures and safeguards recommended in the EIA /EMP and risk analysis report submitted while seeking environmental clearance for the PREP and PX/PTA and PX/PTA/ PR project.

vi. As per the recommendations made in the Being Complied. It was submitted by the PA Risk assessment study for the composite that all the recommendations of Risk facility i.e. PX/PTA/PREP and associated Management Studies have been incorporated facilities carried out by M/s KLG-TNO Safety in the revised Disaster Management Plan. Technology Ltd., the various elements of safety management system should be reviewed and updated keeping in view the new facilities added to the Refinery Complex.

11 Panipat Refinery IOCL 29.6.17

These Included: Process and facilities informatiol1 and documentationi Onsite

,__,"_,"~_EmergencYf\t1anasement Plan, '",. _' ~ ',., '""'W~~'~_'_Th_,~W~Th __W~W"""""M~_~W_-_Th_W~-'-.' vii. Th~';;~oTe~t"~ThU:tKoritr;sP"m'~stW'~~d'here-to ~,ew, "Notecf'and Agreed by the PA as submitted.

stipulations made by the HSPCB for the PREP, PX/PTA projects and NOC gnmt£Hi for the

I,Th ~-4!,!l~!,a I~!!,on.ELC!Pti~!tfgw~Ei'_r_P_1a_n_t..,~,_, " __,,,L_<"~_' __" < Th'W"_"_'~"" ' .-, ,J

Concluding RemarJ<sl

1. Pr()ject Status;

IOeL is under expansion for BS~VI fuel quality up-gradation, capacity expansion of PX/PTA at Panipat Refinery. It was observed during the visit that construction work for the proposed expansion is in progress.

2. Ch ronology of events:

of the Ministry for issuance of certification.

11.04.2017 RO requested for additional information w.r.t. issuante of certification.

29.06.2017 Site Visit for the certified report of the status of the compliance of environmental safegvardsin view of further expansion proposed by the PA.

,w,,2.~,~.Z~~212,_,,_," __.,_,Re,9,~~~~!m ation was ~~,t,:mitt~9 ~l£~.:.~.~ __~_.

3. Implementation ofConditions: It is evident from the above review that:

• Consent to Operate under Water and Air Act has been obtained, which is valid upto 30/09/2021. • Majority of conditions of construction phase was complied whereas a few needs sincere efforts. • Monitoring data of noise, air and water quality were not being submitted with the six monthly

reports. • Discrepancy was noticed from the records in the quantity of fresh water consumption.

4. Housekeeping: Overall it was found satisfactory.

5, Review w.r.f. to MOEFs letter dated 30.5.2012: The report was prepared after site visit on 29.06.17 and submission of the requisite information on 05.07.17.

6. With regards to issuance of show cause/closure notices: None, as submitted by the PA.

7. It is inferred that implementation of environmental safeguards have been found fairly satisfactory.

Competent authority may like to consider the case for grant of extension of the existing EC.

,~ ~\? Jomt Director (5)

12 Panipat Refinery JOeL 29.6.17