review body on senior salaries - northern ireland...
TRANSCRIPT
Review Body on Senior Salaries
REPORT No. 75
Review of Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service pay 2010
July 2010
Chairman: Bill Cockburn, CBE TD
Foreword
Review Body on Senior Salaries The Review Body on Top Salaries (TSRB) was appointed in May 1971 and renamed the
Review Body on Senior Salaries (SSRB) in July 1993, with revised terms of reference.
The terms of reference were revised again in 1998 as a consequence of the
Government’s Comprehensive Spending Review, in 2001 to allow the devolved bodies
direct access to the Review Body’s advice and in 2007 to add certain NHS managers to
the remit.
Value of our independent process The SSRB consists of ten individuals from varying walks of life, including business,
human resources and economics, and including both public, third and private sector
experience. It has independent status and as such is required to be politically impartial.
Each member of the SSRB is recruited through an open process based on advertisement
in the national press and overseen by the independent Office of the Commissioner for
Public Appointments. The SSRB is supported by a secretariat based in the Office of
Manpower Economics (OME), an independent Non-Departmental Public Body which
does not report to Ministers.
In discharging our remit we insist on an open and transparent process to which
stakeholders are invited to contribute. This combination of independent support, a range
of professional experience and well-tried process allows us to study the evidence, receive
views from all parties and consider all sides of any particular argument. As a result we
can make balanced, evidence-based recommendations underpinned by sound rationale
and taking into account all relevant factors and information.
The terms of reference of the Review Body on Senior Salaries The terms of reference are:
The Review Body on Senior Salaries provides independent advice to the Prime
Minister, the Lord Chancellor, the Secretary of State for Defence and the Secretary
i
of State for Health on the remuneration of holders of judicial office; senior civil
servants; senior officers of the armed forces; very senior managers in the NHS1;and
other such public appointments as may from time to time be specified.
The Review Body also advises the Prime Minister from time to time on the pay and
pensions of Members of Parliament and their allowances; on Peers’ allowances; and
on the pay, pensions and allowances of Ministers and others whose pay is
determined by the Ministerial and Other Salaries Act 1975. If asked to do so by the
Presiding Officer and the First Minister of the Scottish Parliament jointly; or by the
Speaker of the Northern Ireland Assembly; or by the Presiding Officer of the
National Assembly for Wales; or by the Mayor of London and the Chair of the
Greater London Assembly jointly; the Review Body also from time to time advises
those bodies on the pay, pensions and allowances of their members and office
holders.
In reaching its recommendations, the Review Body is to have regard to the following
considerations:
the need to recruit, retain and motivate suitably able and qualified people to
exercise their different responsibilities;
regional/local variations in labour markets and their effects on the recruitment
and retention of staff;
Government policies for improving the public services including the
requirement on departments to meet the output targets for the delivery of
departmental services;
the funds available to departments as set out in the Government’s
departmental expenditure limits;
1 NHS Very Senior Managers in England are chief executives, executive directors (except medical directors), and other senior managers with board level responsibility who report directly to the chief executive, in: Strategic Health Authorities; Special Health Authorities, Primary Care Trusts; and Ambulance Trusts.
ii
the Government’s inflation target.
In making recommendations, the Review Body shall consider any factors that the
Government and other witnesses may draw to its attention. In particular it shall
have regard to:
differences in terms and conditions of employment between the public and
private sector and between the remit groups, taking account of relative job
security and the value of benefits in kind;
changes in national pay systems, including flexibility and the reward of
success; and job weight in differentiating the remuneration of particular posts;
the need to maintain broad linkage between the remuneration of the three
main remit groups, while allowing sufficient flexibility to take account of the
circumstances of each group; and
the relevant legal obligations, including anti-discrimination legislation regarding
age, gender, race, sexual orientation, religion and belief and disability.
The Review Body may make other recommendations as it sees fit:
to ensure that, as appropriate, the remuneration of the remit groups relates
coherently to that of their subordinates, encourages efficiency and
effectiveness, and takes account of the different management and
organisational structures that may be in place from time to time;
to relate reward to performance where appropriate;
to maintain the confidence of those covered by the Review Body’s remit that its
recommendations have been properly and fairly determined; and
to ensure that the remuneration of those covered by the remit is consistent
with the Government’s equal opportunities policy.
iii
The Review Body will take account of the evidence it receives about wider economic
considerations and the affordability of its recommendations.
Members of the Review Body are:
Bill Cockburn CBE TD, Chairman2
Professor Richard Disney
Martin Fish
Mike Langley
Professor David Metcalf CBE2
Sir Peter North CBE QC
Professor Alasdair Smith
Chris Stephens2
Bruce Warman2
Paul Williams2
The Secretariat is provided by the Office of Manpower Economics.
This report was submitted to the Minister for Finance and Personnel on 29 July 2010
2 Members of the Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service sub-committee, chaired by Bill Cockburn.
iv
Contents
Paragraph Page Foreword ……………………………………………... i Review Body on Senior Salaries …………………… i Value of our independent process …………………. i The terms of reference of the Review
Body on Senior Salaries …………………………….. i
Summary and recommendations ………………… ix Background to this review…………………….……... ix Current pay arrangements ………………………….. ix Levels of public sector pay in Northern Ireland …… x Our conclusions ………………………………………. x
Chapter 1 Introduction …………………..……………………… 1 Introduction and background to the review..... 1.1 1 Senior public sector pay in Northern
Ireland ………………………………………..
1.4 2
The comprehensive pay and grading review ……………………………………........
1.5
2
The Northern Ireland Office ………………… 1.6 2 The review process ……………………………. 1.7 3
Sources of evidence …………………………… 1.8 3
Our report on Public Sector Senior Remuneration …………………………………...
1.9 4
v
Chapter 2 The Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service ……… 5 The economic and labour market context in
Northern Ireland ……………………….……...
2.1 5
Output ……………………………………….. 2.2 5 Cost of living ………………………………... 2.3 5 Labour market ……………………………… 2.4 6 Role of the Northern Ireland Senior Civil
Service …………………………………………
2.7 9
Relationship between the SCS in Northern Ireland and Great Britain …….……………….
2.11
11
Chapter 3 Remuneration of the Senior Civil Service in Northern Ireland ……………………………..………..
15
Introduction ……………………………………. 3.1 15 History of the current pay arrangements …... 3.2 15 Bonus ………………………………………….. 3.6 18 Problems with the pay system ……………… 3.7 19 Specific Northern Ireland issues ……………. 3.8 21 Bonuses …………………………………….. 3.11 22 Pension ……………………………………... 3.15 24 Pay progression ………………………………. 3.18 24 Recruitment and retention …………………… 3.22 25 Overlap with Grade 6 ………………………… 3.26 27 Pay of comparators …………………………... 3.29 28 Diversity ……………………………………….. 3.39 33
vi
Chapter 4 Proposals for a new pay system …………………. 35 Our objectives for a new pay system …...….. 4.1 35 Performance-related pay ……………………. 4.2 36 Our proposals for a new system ……………. 4.5 37 Performance-related pay scales ……………. 4.6 38 Non-consolidated performance awards ……. 4.11 41 Assimilation to pay scales …………………… 4.12 42 Revalorisation of scales – determining SCS
pay ……………………………………………...
4.13
42 Recruitment and retention premia ………….. 4.16 45 Performance management ………………….. 4.17 46 Organisational performance ………………… 4.18 46
Age discrimination ……………………………. 4.19 47
Costs of our proposals ………………………. 4.20 47
Effect of our proposals on motivation ………. 4.22 48
Annexes
Annex A Letter from the Minister for Finance and Personnel: terms of reference for the review ……………………
51
Annex B List of those who gave evidence ……………………. 57
Annex C Code of Practice on top-level reward in the public sector …………………………………………………..
59
Annex D List of Northern Ireland civil service departments … 77
Annex E Median salaries of members of the Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service and wider public sector comparators 2008-09 ..……………………………….
79
Annex F Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service pay bands as at 1 April 2010 …………………………………………
83
Annex G Glossary of abbreviations …………………………… 85
vii
viii
Summary and recommendations Background to this review 1. The Northern Ireland Minister for Finance and Personnel asked us to
carry out this review of the pay arrangements for the Senior Civil Service in
Northern Ireland. Public sector employees constitute some 30 per cent of all
employees in Northern Ireland, compared with 25 per cent across the UK as a
whole. Some people have questioned whether senior public sector salaries
are too high in Northern Ireland and, if so, whether that adversely affects the
private sector.
2. There are some 220 members of the Senior Civil Service in Northern
Ireland. They provide leadership for departments and agencies, and advice to
the Ministers in the Northern Ireland Executive. They manage large budgets
and organisations providing public services to the population and they operate
in an unusual and challenging political environment.
Current pay arrangements
3. Although the Northern Ireland SCS are managed separately from the
SCS in Great Britain, their pay arrangements are based on the same model of
three broad pay bands within which progression is by performance-related
increases (there is no automatic pay progression) supplemented by
performance-related, non-consolidated bonuses. However, although the
system resembles that in Great Britain, median pay for each pay band in
Northern Ireland is significantly lower than in Great Britain. Moreover, the
Northern Ireland Executive has suspended the bonus arrangements in
Northern Ireland since 2009.
4. Since the current pay arrangements were introduced throughout the
United Kingdom in 2002, various problems have emerged, most notably the
failure of the system to deliver the expected rate of pay progression, but other
problems included the failure to take account of organisational performance
when awarding individual bonuses and lack of clarity about the different
ix
criteria for awarding base pay increases and bonuses. We conclude that the
current pay system is widely perceived, both within and outside the senior civil
service, as needing revision.
Levels of public sector pay in Northern Ireland
5. Although we heard anecdotal concerns about senior public sector pay
being higher than that in the private sector in Northern Ireland, we were
unable to find hard evidence of this. There are very few large private sector
employers in Northern Ireland and consequently very few senior managers
who can be compared with the SCS; groups at this level cannot be separately
identified in large-scale statistical surveys of the whole workforce. However,
the information available to us suggests that, looking at total remuneration,
the NI SCS are generally paid at or below levels of private sector comparators
and roughly on a par with wider public sector employees at equivalent levels
of seniority. Moreover, as noted above, median SCS pay in Northern Ireland
is below that of the SCS in Great Britain.
Our conclusions
6. We found no evidence of problems with recruitment and retention for
generalist NI SCS posts, but recognise there can be difficulties in recruiting to
some specialist posts at current pay levels. The bonus system is unpopular
with the NI SCS themselves and does not provide an incentive for good
performance. Moreover, the public perception is that it provides additional
payments to people who already have good salaries. The failure of the
current pay system to deliver pay progression, i.e. some reward for SCS
members who increase their skills and experience, is demotivating. The
existing pay ranges are much too long. They create unrealistic expectations
since most NI SCS members will progress only a short way through their
range. The pay of the NI SCS should be aligned to the local labour market
and economic circumstances. It should normally be set on the basis of
independent, evidence-based recommendations. Remuneration committees
x
with independent membership should play a stronger role in implementing
and moderating pay decisions for individual NI SCS members.
7. Our full recommendations are as follow:
Recommendation 1: We recommend the following pay scales to replace the
existing pay structure:
Pay Band 1 Pay Band 2 Pay Band 3
Minimum 57,300 81,600 98,059 59,320 84,100 101,000 61,340 86,600 104,000 63,360 89,100 107,000 65,380 91,600 110,000 67,400 94,100 113,000 69,420 96,600 116,000 71,440 99,100 119,000 73,460 101,600 122,000 75,480 104,100 125,000 Maximum 77,500 107,000 128,000
Recommendation 2: We recommend that, for those below the maximum of
the pay scale:
• the top 10 per cent of performers move up two steps on the scales (or
to the maximum if they are one step away); and
• the next 50 per cent of performers move up one step on the scale.
Recommendation 3: We recommend that the pay of any Northern Ireland
Senior Civil Service members whose performance merits the imposition of a
performance improvement plan or similar measure, should remain frozen,
even when the pay scale is revalorised, unless and until their performance
improves.
xi
Recommendation 4: We recommend that those promoted to or within the
Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service move to the lowest point of the scale to
which they have been promoted that is above their current salary.
Recommendation 5: We recommend that members of the Northern Ireland
Senior Civil Service who are paid above the maximum of the new pay scales
should have their pay increased by the same percentage as any revalorisation
of the relevant scale (or of the top point of that scale if the increase is not
uniform), provided that their performance in the year immediately preceding
the increase has been at least satisfactory.
Recommendation 6: We recommend that up to 25 per cent of the best
performers who are either at the top of their pay scales or paid above the new
maximum and therefore not eligible for pay progression steps be eligible for
non-consolidated and non-pensionable performance awards of up to 5 per
cent of their salary.
Recommendation 7: We recommend that assimilation to the new pay scales
take place on 1 April 2011 and that:
• those whose current pay corresponds exactly to a scale point continue
on that rate;
• those whose current pay is above the maximum scale point continue
on that rate; and
• all others move to the next scale point above their current rate.
Recommendation 8: We recommend that for 2010-11 there be no increase
in Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service pay.
Recommendation 9: We recommend that the current bonus scheme,
suspended by the Executive in 2009, be discontinued.
xii
Recommendation 10: We recommend that an independent body such as
the Review Body on Senior Salaries should review Northern Ireland Senior
Civil Service pay annually and that the Northern Ireland Executive undertake
to accept its independent recommendations in all but the most exceptional
circumstances.
Recommendation 11: We recommend that the new pay system be
monitored carefully to ensure that it is not creating unintended upward pay
drift and that it remains affordable.
Recommendation 12: We recommend that recruitment and retention premia
be available to remunerate specialist roles and that remuneration committees
determine the need for and correct level of any such premia.
Recommendation 13: We recommend that payment of a recruitment and
retention premium cease if the individual for whom the premium was originally
approved moves to another job in the Senior Civil Service that does not justify
a premium or if labour market conditions change, rendering it no longer
necessary. The remuneration committee should review any continuing
premia every three years.
Recommendation 14: We recommend that remuneration committees
consider whether, in specific circumstances, performance-related awards for
members of the Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service in under-performing
departments, agencies or parts of those organisations should be restricted or
suspended for a period.
xiii
Chapter 1
Introduction
Introduction and background to the review 1.1 The Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) has advised on the pay of
the Senior Civil Service (SCS) in Great Britain since 1971. Although the
Northern Ireland SCS have not been part of our remit group, our
recommendations for the SCS in Great Britain have largely been applied to
them until 2009. We were therefore pleased that the Minister for Finance and
Personnel invited us to carry out a review of the pay arrangements for the
SCS in Northern Ireland. We also advise on the pay of the judiciary and
senior military officers throughout the United Kingdom, on the pay of certain
senior health service managers in England and we reviewed the pay of senior
executives in Northern Ireland health and social care organisations in 2009.
1.2 As in Great Britain, the Northern Ireland civil service (NICS) is the body
of permanent officials who carry out the policies of, and provide advice to, the
government of the day. In Northern Ireland, under the terms of the Belfast
agreement, the government or Executive comprises the First Minister, the
deputy First Minister, 11 Departmental Ministers and the junior ministers in the
Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister. Ministers are nominated
according to a proportional system by political parties represented in the
Northern Ireland Legislative Assembly.
1.3 The Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service (NI SCS) are the 220 or so
most senior managers in the NICS who provide leadership for departments
and their associated executive agencies, and advise the Executive. We
describe the composition of the NI SCS in more detail in Chapter 2. The
nature of devolved government in Northern Ireland creates particular
challenges for the NI SCS. Unlike in other parts of the United Kingdom, the
Executive is not formed by a single party or two parties with a formal coalition.
1
Instead, Ministers are drawn from five different parties and they have drawn
up a Programme for Government3 setting out plans and priorities for the years
2008-11. The nature of government in Northern Ireland creates a greater
need for co-ordination and negotiation of priorities across departments, a role
which falls largely to the NI SCS.
Senior public sector pay in Northern Ireland
1.4 In recent years there has been increasing public and media focus on
the pay of those in the public sector and even more so at senior level. The
Committee for Finance and Personnel has debated the appropriateness of the
NI SCS pay arrangements, especially the bonus system, on several
occasions, and has called for an independent review of senior civil servants’
pay arrangements. In response to that request, the Minister for Finance and
Personnel announced on 11 June 2009 that an independent review on the NI
SCS pay structure would take place. On 23 March 2010 the Minister wrote to
the Chairman of the SSRB to ask us to review the pay arrangements of the NI
SCS. Copies of that letter and of the terms of reference for our review are at
Annex A.
The comprehensive pay and grading review
1.5 The NICS is currently conducting a comprehensive pay and grading
review for staff below SCS which will report in 2011. That review covers all
the civil service grades below the SCS, including Grades 7 and 6 from which
members can be promoted to the SCS. We are not involved in that review but
we believe those conducting it may find this report helpful, in particular our
conclusions about overall pay levels and the relationship between the pay for
Grade 6 and that for SCS Pay Band 1.
The Northern Ireland Office
1.6 The Northern Ireland Office (NIO) is a department of the UK civil
service responsible for supporting the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland
and overseeing the Northern Ireland devolution settlement, as well as 3 Northern Ireland Executive. Programme for Government and Budget. Available at: http://www.northernireland.gov.uk/pfgfinal.pdf
2
representing Northern Ireland issues at UK Government level. Although
responsibility for policing and criminal justice was transferred to the Northern
Ireland Assembly and Executive in April 2010, the NIO still has responsibility
for other areas of governance such as national security, human rights and
elections. The NIO has around 175 staff in Belfast and London. Since the
NIO is part of the British civil service, its SCS members are not covered by
this review.
The review process 1.7 In order to carry out this review we formed a sub-committee consisting
of the SSRB Chairman and four members – those on the sub-committee are
identified at the end of the Foreword and a short outline of their professional
backgrounds can be found on the Office of Manpower Economics (OME)
website4. This review began in March 2010 and concluded with the
submission of our report to the Minister for Finance and Personnel in July
2010. During that time the sub-committee met on seven occasions to
consider evidence, formulate recommendations and draft the report, which
was then approved by the whole SSRB membership.
Sources of evidence 1.8 As an independent body we are able to take evidence from any
relevant source and to make recommendations based on our judgement and
all of the evidence we have received. One of the most important ways of
gathering evidence is to meet members of our remit group – in this instance
the NI SCS. In April 2010 we visited Northern Ireland and held discussion
groups with members of the NI SCS, including Permanent Secretaries. We
also met the Minister for Finance and Personnel and the Head of the NICS.
We thank all those whom we met for their contributions, as well as those in
the Department of Finance and Personnel who arranged our visit and
obtained further written evidence for us. A list of those who provided evidence
for the review can be found at Annex B. We received written evidence from
the Northern Ireland Assembly Committee for Finance and Personnel, the 4 Review Body on Senior Salaries. Members’ biographies. Available at: http://www.ome.uk.com/members_biographies.cfm
3
Northern Ireland branch of the Confederation of British Industry and the
Northern Ireland Civil Service Commissioners. The FDA, the trade union
which represents the SCS, gave oral and written evidence. Our secretariat
also obtained data on the economic and labour market context in Northern
Ireland for us.
Our report on Public Sector Senior Remuneration 1.9 On 25 March 2010 the UK Government published our report on senior
pay in the public sector5. That report proposed a draft code of practice for
setting senior remuneration6 in public sector organisations, reproduced in
Annex C of this report. We believe the principles set out in the code are fully
applicable to the NI SCS and we explain this in more detail in our
recommendations in Chapter 4.
5 Review Body on Senior Salaries. Report No. 74, Initial report on Public Sector Senior Remuneration 2010. Cm 7848. Available at: http://www.ome.uk.com/Initial_Report_on_Public_Sector_Senior_Remuneration_2010_PSSR.aspx 6 Defined as those with pensionable pay in excess of £100K per year.
4
Chapter 2
The Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service The economic and labour market context in Northern Ireland 2.1 Evidence on the economy for Northern Ireland is difficult to separate
from that for the United Kingdom. Many economic indicators, such as
consumer price indices and gross domestic product, are not produced
separately for Northern Ireland. However, the measures that are available
indicate that the Northern Ireland economy has followed the same pattern as
the rest of the United Kingdom and is now beginning to recover from recession.
Output
2.2 The most recent regional gross value added7 (GVA) data, published in
December 2009 by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), showed that
Northern Ireland had GVA per head of £16,000 in 2008 which compared with a
United Kingdom GVA per head of £20,500 and was the third lowest in the
United Kingdom after Wales and the North East.
Cost of living
2.3 The most recent published ONS regional consumer price levels are for
2004 and these showed Northern Ireland price levels 4.2 per cent below the
United Kingdom average.8 More recent official regional housing prices are
available and these show that the average house price in Northern Ireland was
£163,000 compared with £208,000 for the United Kingdom in April 2010.
However, as Figure 2.1 shows, the trend for house prices in Northern Ireland
has been a steep decline from a high in 2007 compared with a much more
gentle decrease in the other countries of the United Kingdom, from which
7 Gross value added (GVA) measures the contribution to the economy of each individual producer, industry or sector in the United Kingdom. GVA is used in the estimation of gross domestic product (GDP): GVA + taxes on products - subsidies on products = GDP Regional GVA is published by the Office for National Statistics but regional GDP is not. 8 Wingfield D., Fenwick D. and Smith K. Relative regional consumer price levels in 2004. Economic Trends 615, February 2005. Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.United Kingdom/articles/economic_trends/ET615Wingfield.pdf
5
England, Wales and Scotland have now mostly recovered. Regional
comparisons by Croner Reward in March 2010 show that the income required
in Northern Ireland to maintain a given standard of living is less than for the
United Kingdom as a whole, one of the key factors being lower housing costs.9
Whilst this is not as complete a picture as we should like, all of these data
sources indicate that Northern Ireland has a lower cost of living than the
average in the United Kingdom.
Figure 2.1: House Price Indices for the countries of the United Kingdom, March 2002 – April 2010
100.0
125.0
150.0
175.0
200.0
225.0
250.0
275.0
300.0
Mar-02
Sep-02
Mar-03
Sep-03
Mar-04
Sep-04
Mar-05
Sep-05
Mar-06
Sep-06
Mar-07
Sep-07
Mar-08
Sep-08
Mar-09
Sep-09
Mar-10
Inde
x le
vel (
Feb
2002
=100
.0)
EnglandWalesScotlandNorthern Ireland
Source: Communities and Local Government
Labour market
2.4 Turning to the labour market, we have more sources of evidence.
Unemployment in Northern Ireland is currently lower on the International
Labour Organization (ILO) method but higher on the claimant count than in the
UK as a whole. The ILO Unemployment measure was 6.9 per cent in Northern
Ireland compared with 7.9 per cent for the whole of the United Kingdom for the
9 Housing costs include rent, council tax and water rates.
6
most recent quarter.10 The Northern Ireland claimant count was 55,500 (a rate
of 6.2 per cent) compared with 1,481,100 (a rate of 4.6 per cent) across the
United Kingdom.
2.5 In 2009 the ONS Labour Force Survey recorded 30 per cent of Northern
Ireland employees in the public sector compared with 25 per cent in the United
Kingdom as a whole. Sir David Varney noted the size of the public sector in
Northern Ireland and commented on the likely historical reasons in his Review
of the Competitiveness of Northern Ireland: 11
“The reasons for the present structure of the Northern Ireland economy, and in particular the ongoing significance of the public sector, are complex, but are likely to reflect historically low levels of private sector investment and development during the years of the Troubles, and the subsequent high level of public sector investment aimed at supporting economic recovery.”
Therefore, there is more public sector management of the infrastructure in
Northern Ireland12 than in any other area of the United Kingdom and, overall,
the public sector makes up a larger proportion of the Northern Ireland labour
market than it does across the United Kingdom as a whole. Figure 2.2 shows
the structure of the public sector with roughly two-thirds of public sector
employees working in health and education.
10 Office for National Statistics. Labour Force Survey. February – April 2010. 11 Sir David Varney. Review of the Competitiveness of Northern Ireland, April 2008. Available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/varney_review300408.pdf 12 For example, water and sewerage services are supplied by Northern Ireland Water, a Government-owned company, and the railways are operated by Northern Ireland Railways which are also state-owned.
7
Figure 2.2: Northern Ireland public sector employment by sector, 2009
Other NI Central
Government8%
Teaching staff, non-teaching sta ff &
education & library boards
31%
NHS Trusts32%
UK Central Government
2%
Public Corporations
5%
Northern Ireland Central
Government Civil Service
12%Local
Government5%Other bodies
under aegis of NI Centra l Government
5%
Source: NI Public Sector Employee Jobs, Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment NI
2.6 The broad distribution of earnings across the public and private sectors
is given in figure 2.3. This shows that the gap between public and private
sector earnings is larger in Northern Ireland than in the United Kingdom as a
whole. However, the Northern Ireland SCS are paid above the 90th percentile
of public sector pay and thus are not covered by these data which simply
provide broad background about relative public and private sector pay.
Moreover, it is important in looking at these figures to bear in mind that they
may be affected by compositional differences between the public and private
sector workforces, with the public sector workers having on average higher
levels of education or qualification than those in the private sector. There are
no published figures comparing earnings at the level of NI SCS members with
those of comparable workers in the private sector in Northern Ireland. This is
because the sample sizes for such workers in the Office for National Statistics
Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings are too small to be statistically reliable.
We have, however, obtained some figures from PricewaterhouseCoopers – see
in particular Table 3.6 in Chapter 3 – which suggest that the median total
remuneration of most private sector workers at levels comparable with the NI
SCS is higher than that of the SCS.
8
Figure 2.3: Distribution of full-time earnings in the public and private sectors, 2009
£0 £10,000 £20,000 £30,000 £40,000 £50,000 £60,000
UK - private sector
UK - public sector
NI - private sector
NI - public sector
£17,
500
£54,
678
£47,
171
£40,
000
£44,
794
£19,
223
£14,
588
£20,
081
lower quartile median upper quartile 90th percentile
Source: Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, ONS 2009 Note: SCS pay in Great Britain would be at the 95th percentile of the public sector and above and therefore beyond the range given here. Role of the Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service 2.7 As indicated earlier, the Northern Ireland civil service (NICS) is one of
the largest employers in Northern Ireland with around 25,000 permanent staff13
in a wide range of disciplines. It is administered separately from the rest of the
home civil service in the United Kingdom (the Diplomatic Service is also
separately managed), although the Head of the NICS is a member of the UK
Permanent Secretaries Management Group.
2.8 The Senior Civil Service (SCS) was established in 1996 following
recommendations in the Continuity and Change White Papers which stated that
the civil service should be:
“led by a highly professional group of senior advisers and managers working closely in support of Ministers both in the development and implementation of Government policy and in the management of
13 Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland Civil Service (NICS) Fact Sheet. Available at: http://www.careersserviceni.com/NR/rdonlyres/38DE1009-2261-40D2-97F3-6803C82B06B9/0/NICS.pdf
9
services”14
While decisions on reward arrangements for those below the SCS were
transferred to individual Departments in Great Britain, the SCS remained as a
single body across departments “whose focus and loyalty was wider than
simply one Department or agency”.15 The SCS have been treated as a single
entity for reward and performance management purposes.
2.9 Members of the SCS in the Northern Ireland civil service provide
leadership in the delivery of public services and the design of policy, as well as
advice and support for Ministers in the Northern Ireland Executive. More
specifically, they are tasked with supporting Ministers in the delivery of the
Executive’s Programme for Government, a programme aimed at building “a
peaceful, fair and prosperous society in Northern Ireland, with respect for the
rule of law and where everyone can enjoy a better quality of life now and in
years to come.”16
2.10 The Northern Ireland Executive consists of 12 departments17, 11 of
which were created, along with the Northern Ireland Assembly, by the Northern
Ireland Act 1998 and the Departments (Northern Ireland) Order 1999. The
remaining department, the Department of Justice, is a new Northern Ireland
department which came into existence on 12 April 2010 following the transfer of
responsibility for policing and justice functions from the Northern Ireland Office
(NIO).
14 The Civil Service. Continuity and Change. Cm 2627. July 1994 and the Civil Service. Taking Forward Continuity and Change. Cm 2748. January 1995: quoted in Senior Civil Service Workforce and Reward Strategy: Report of the Steering Group to the Cabinet Secretary. November 2008, paragraph 3.5. Available at: http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/Assets/Final%20Version%20of%20Sir%20David%20Normington's%20report%20for%20publication._tcm6-6542.doc 15 Ibid, paragraph 3.5. 16 Northern Ireland Executive, Programme for Government and Budget. Available at: http://www.northernireland.gov.uk/pfgfinal.pdf 17 Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister; Department of Agriculture and Rural Development; Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure; Department of Education; Department for Employment and Learning; Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment; Department of the Environment; Department of Finance and Personnel; Department of Health, Department of Justice; Social Services and Public Safety; Department for Regional Development; and the Department for Social Development.
10
Relationship between the SCS in Northern Ireland and Great Britain 2.11 SCS staff in Northern Ireland below the Head of the Civil Service are
divided into three pay bands. Permanent Secretaries in Northern Ireland are in
Pay Band 3, unlike those in Great Britain who are in a separate pay grouping
above Pay Band 3. The rationale for this is that government departments in
Northern Ireland are smaller and therefore the scale and span of control
exercised by Permanent Secretaries in Northern Ireland is less than their
mainland counterparts. Pay Band 2 contains Deputy Secretary (Grade 3) level
posts and Pay Band 1 contains Assistant Secretary (Grade 5) level posts.
There is flexibility to use a fourth pay band, Pay Band 1A, which overlaps the
top of the Pay Band 1 pay scale and bottom of Pay Band 2 but we are advised
that this pay band is not used in Northern Ireland. Table 2.1 below shows the
composition of the Northern Ireland and GB SCS.
Table 2.1: Senior Civil Service staff headcount by grade, as at 1 January 2009
NI grade GB equivalent NI SCS1 % GB SCS2 %Head of NICS Permanent Secretary 1 0.5 36 0.8Permanent Secretary (Grade 2a) Pay Band 3 14 6.7 171 4.0
Deputy Secretary (Grade 3) Pay Band 2 39 18.7 770 18.1
- Pay Band 1A 0 0 199 4.7Assistant Secretary (Grade 5) Pay Band 1 155 74.1 3,078 72.4
Total 209 100 4,254 100.0Sources: Northern Ireland Civil Service, Cabinet Office 1 The figures exclude the GB SCS members (in the Northern Ireland Office) who transferred to the NI SCS in April 2010. 2 This is a slightly lower figure than the total SCS as it excludes 17 SCS in non-standard pay bands.
11
2.12 As can be seen in Table 2.2 below, the headcount trend in the NI SCS is
very different to the GB SCS; while numbers in the NI SCS have fallen by just
over 6 per cent in the years 2004 – 2009, those in the rest of the UK have risen
by almost 10 per cent. However, despite this fall there is still a greater density
of SCS members in Northern Ireland, nearly twice that of the United Kingdom
as a whole.18
Table 2.2: Total Senior Civil Service headcount, 2004 - 2009
Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20091
NI SCS 223 233 224 225 207 209% change since previous year n/a 4.5 -3.9 0.4 -8.0 1.0% change since 2004 n/a 4.5 0.4 0.9 -7.2 -6.3GB SCS 3,893 3,906 4,031 4,075 4,212 4,271 % change since previous year n/a 0.3 3.2 1.1 3.4 1.4% change since 2004 n/a 0.3 3.5 4.7 8.2 9.7Sources: HRConnect, Northern Ireland Human Resource Management System (HMRS), Cabinet Office 1 The figures exclude the GB SCS members (in the Northern Ireland Office) who transferred to the NI SCS in April 2010. 2.13 A number of GB civil service departments employ staff in Northern
Ireland and their pay and performance arrangements are covered by Cabinet
Office guidance. The following departments have employees based in
Northern Ireland:
• Immigration and Nationality Directorate;
• HM Revenue and Customs;
• Maritime and Coastguard Agency;
• Ministry of Defence;
• Northern Ireland Office; and
• Identity and Passport Service.
2.14 The SCS in Northern Ireland are able to take up secondment
opportunities, including those in the GB civil service. These are of fixed
duration and although secondees retain their NICS status, their annual pay
award is determined by their employing Department. The presence in Northern
18 There is one NI SCS member per 7,500 Northern Ireland residents compared to one SCS member per 14,000 Great Britain residents.
12
Ireland of civil servants on GB pay rates means that NICS members are likely
to be aware of pay differences between the two groups.
13
14
Chapter 3
Remuneration of the Senior Civil Service in Northern Ireland Introduction 3.1 The current pay system for the SCS in Northern Ireland is essentially the
same as that for the SCS in Great Britain. The SCS in Northern Ireland below
the Head of the NI Civil Service19 are divided into three main pay bands.
Table 3.1: Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service pay bands as at 1 April 2009
Pay Band Minimum Maximum Median salary Number in band
1 £57,300 £116,000 £65,177 155 2 £81,600 £160,000 £92,752 36 3 £98,059 £205,000 £106,243 14
Source: Northern Ireland Civil Service Notes: 1 The figures exclude the GB SCS members (in the Northern Ireland Office) who transferred to the NI SCS in April 2010.
History of the current pay arrangements 3.2 The current pay arrangements were introduced in 2002 at the same time
as the introduction of new pay arrangements for the SCS in Great Britain. The
principal feature of the new system was a reduction from the previous nine pay
bands for senior staff below Permanent Secretary to three (or four, with Band
1A) very broad pay bands, where each band corresponded to a range of job
evaluation scores (according to Job Evaluation of Senior Posts – JESP). The
rationale for the Northern Ireland Civil Service (NICS) following the same pay
arrangements for the SCS as in Great Britain is that the NICS uses the same
grading structure based on a similar job evaluation methodology (although
Permanent Secretaries in Northern Ireland are in Pay Band 3). Moreover, as
mentioned in Chapter 2, there are members of the GB civil service in Northern
Ireland.
19 The Head of the NI Civil Service is paid as a Permanent Secretary in the same pay band (£141,836 - £277,349) as Permanent Secretaries in Great Britain.
15
Table 3.2: Structure of the GB pay system from 1 April 2002
3¹
2¹
1A1
Upper premium zone
Premium zone
Upper zone
Lower zone
RPC
HPTR
PTR
Midpt
Min
JESP 7-12 JESP19-22
JESP 13-18 JESP 11-14 Key: Midpt = Midpoint between minimum and PTR PTR = Progression Target Rate HPTR = Higher Performance Target Rate RPC = Recruitment and Performance Ceiling JESP = Job Evaluation of Senior Posts 1. The NI SCS system uses ranges of JESP 13-17 for staff in Pay Band 2 and 18-22 for Permanent Secretaries.
3.3 Under this system SCS members were expected to progress annually
towards the Progression Target Rate (PTR) at a speed determined by their
assessed performance each year against a number of agreed measures,
subject to a range for individual pay awards (in 2002-03, 0 to 10 per cent of
salary) and an overall ceiling on the increase in pay bill, both recommended
annually by the SSRB. Individuals were allocated to one of three performance
tranches, with a quarter in the top tranche, between five and ten per cent in the
bottom tranche, and the remainder in the middle tranche. The wholly
‘satisfactory’ performer should have progressed to the PTR in nine or so years,
whereas a consistently ‘top’ performer should have done so in three or four
years. Progression through the range was therefore determined by
performance, but also by the individual’s existing position in the pay band. The
system was intended to give larger increases and hence more rapid pay
progression for individuals in the top and middle performance tranches who
16
were paid towards the bottom of a pay band, compared with similar performers
already paid at higher levels. The performance tranches and associated rates
of progression that applied when the system was introduced are set out in
Table 3.3.
Table 3.3: Pay matrix with effect from 1 April 2002 Position in Pay Range
Performance Tranche
Lower Zone
Upper Zone
Premium Zone
Upper Premium
Zone
Top (1) (25%) 10.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0%
Middle (2) (65-70%) 6.0% 4.5% 2.5% 2.5%
Bottom (3) (5-10%) 0 to 2.5%
Midpoint
0 to 2.5%
PTR
0 to 2.5%
Higher PTR
0 to 2.5%
RPC
NB: Any pay awards for staff with salaries above the Recruitment and Performance Ceiling were paid as in the upper premium zone and were non-consolidated.
The PTR was intended to be the effective pay band maximum for most staff.
However, the consistently best performers could progress beyond this level to
the Higher Performance Target Rate (HPTR) and beyond. The area above the
PTR could also be used (supposedly exceptionally) when, in seeking to recruit
externally, departments considered that the PTR did not allow them to attract
candidates with the necessary skills. It appears that departments in Great
Britain made much more use of this facility than those in Northern Ireland,
because they recruited more external candidates, and this helps to explain why
median SCS pay is now significantly higher in Great Britain than in Northern
Ireland.
3.4 PTRs were dropped for Pay Bands 2 and 3 in Great Britain and Northern
Ireland in April 2006 and were also abolished for Pay Bands 1 and 1A two
years later. The PTRs were removed because the Government “envisage[d] a
more individualised approach to pay”. It noted the gap in pay levels between
the SCS and the external executive market was especially marked at these
levels and that a “more individualised approach for the most senior people
would closely reflect best practice in large organisations in both the private and
17
wider public sectors”.20
3.5 Pay bands in Great Britain and Northern Ireland were in line until 2009
when the Northern Ireland Government decided not to apply the increases in
the pay bands recommended for the SCS and applied in Great Britain. This
leaves the current pay bands in Great Britain and Northern Ireland as follows in
Table 3.4.
Table 3.4: Current SCS pay bands (as at 1 April 2010) Great Britain Northern Ireland Pay Band
Minimum £
Maximum £
Median1
£ Minimum
£ Maximum
£ Median1
£ 1 58,200 117,800 73,699 57,300 116,000 65,177
2 82,900 162,500 102,005 81,600 160,000 92,752
3 101,500 208,100 135,150 98,059 205,000 106,2431 As at 1 April 2009
Bonus
3.6 Base pay awards were intended to reflect growth in skills/experience
while in-year performance against objectives was rewarded, from 2002, by non-
consolidated bonuses, paid originally to 75 per cent of the SCS and more
recently to 65 per cent in Great Britain. Bonuses were subject to a minimum
and maximum cash amount for each Pay Band and the size of individual
awards was intended to reflect relative performance. The bonus system was
phased in. Originally the bonus pot was 3 per cent of pay bill and the
Government’s aim for Great Britain was to increase the pot gradually to 10 per
cent of pay bill, although this target was never reached and departments often
did not use the full amount available in a given year. For example, the
Government had proposed and SSRB agreed that the pot for the GB SCS in
2008-09 should be 8.6 per cent of pay bill but departments used only 7.6 per
cent of pay bill. Permanent Secretaries have now decided retrospectively to
reduce the pot for the SCS in Great Britain to a maximum of 5 per cent of pay
bill for bonuses paid in respect of performance in the year 2009-10. In addition,
the Prime Minister has announced that for 2010-11 only 25 per cent of the GB
20 Cabinet Office evidence to the SSRB – December 2005.
18
SCS will receive bonuses, and the Government announced a two-year public
sector pay freeze in Great Britain in the Emergency Budget on 22 June 2010.
Meanwhile, the Northern Ireland Executive decided in August 2009 not to pay
any bonuses to the SCS for 2008-09 and instead increased base pay by 3.5
per cent on average with effect from April 2009. The Executive has not yet
taken any decisions on SCS base pay and bonuses from 2010-11 but is
awaiting this report.
Problems with the pay system 3.7 We have documented problems with the pay system described above in
successive annual reports. Although those reports were concerned with Great
Britain, we understand that many of the problems also apply to Northern
Ireland. The most important failings put to us can be summarised as follows:
• pay progression proved to be much slower than expected, even
though the Government set the PTR significantly lower than
SSRB had recommended. This was essentially because annual
pay settlements were low, reflecting low inflation, which made it
impossible for departments to honour the pay matrix set out in
Table 3.3 above. According to that matrix, 90 to 95 per cent of
SCS members in the lower pay zone should have received
increases of between 6 and 10 per cent of salary. However,
most SCS members were in that zone and it was impossible for
them to receive increases of that magnitude when the overall
pay award had to be contained within an average annual pay bill
increase of 3.65 per cent between 2002 and 2009. If the pay
band minima and maxima were increased by the same
percentage as the increase in the pay bill, as was often the case,
then an SCS member receiving an average increase would stay
in roughly the same position relative to the pay band minimum
and would not progress towards the maximum;
• the distinction between base pay increases and bonuses was
19
always at best poorly understood by both departments and the
SCS themselves, with some departments conflating the two
decisions. Much of the rationale for the original system has now
been forgotten;
• although the Recruitment and Performance Ceiling (RPC) was
never intended to be attainable for most SCS members, it
created resentment and some risk of equal pay claims when
external recruits were appointed at pay levels well above those
of most existing SCS members and sometimes close to (or
exceptionally in a few cases even above) the RPC. This
appears to have been much rarer in Northern Ireland than in
Great Britain, partly because the thresholds above which central
approval of starting salaries is required are lower in Northern
Ireland;
• performance is very difficult to measure across the SCS and we
have heard complaints from SCS members that the process is
not objective, for example because policy work is hard to
measure, the degree of challenge is hard to predict and priorities
can change in year. In comparison, some delivery jobs have
measurable outputs which make performance easier to assess;
• another argument is that most SCS members work as part of
teams and the emphasis on individual and relative performance
is both divisive and runs counter to a co-operative approach;
• moreover, some argue that the application of forced distributions
in small units can be demotivating because it can oblige
managers to place some satisfactory performers in the bottom
performance tranche, with consequences for their pay and
morale. However, against this, many SCS members have told
us that the civil service does not deal sufficiently rigorously with
20
poor performers and that forced distribution is therefore a
necessary, albeit sometimes arbitrary, discipline;
• there is a strong view that bonuses do not act as incentives to
good performance, in part because they are too small (private
sector bonuses – excluding financial services – at the equivalent
level of seniority would typically average around 25 per cent of
salary21 compared to around 10 per cent for those SCS
members receiving one) and because in the SCS there is no
automatic link between achieving objectives and receiving a
bonus. Some SCS members could achieve all their objectives
but not receive a bonus because their immediate colleagues
were perceived to have performed relatively better, or to have
faced greater challenges during the year in question;
• although modelled on private sector practice, the SCS bonus
system takes no account of organisational performance.
Whereas in the private sector the size of bonuses (and indeed
whether bonuses are paid at all in a given period) depends
largely on the financial performance of the organisation as a
whole and its component cost centres, the SCS has a fixed
bonus pot each year. This leads to accusations that bonuses
are being paid in some parts of the civil service that are publicly
perceived to have performed badly.
Specific Northern Ireland issues 3.8 Following an investigation by the Assembly’s Committee for Finance and
Personnel with the Department of Finance and Personnel into the operation of
the pay and bonus system, the Committee raised concerns about whether the
system was meeting the objectives of the NI SCS pay strategy and questioned
whether the arrangements for the NI SCS should mirror those applying to the
21 Source: Hay Group. Median private sector bonuses in the past year ranged from 14 per cent of base salary at the equivalent of Grade 6 (i.e. immediately below SCS) to 35 per cent at the equivalent of Pay Band 3.
21
SCS in Great Britain. One outcome was that in 2009, the NI Executive decided
not to pay bonus awards to the NI SCS for that year while bonuses continued to
be paid to the SCS in Great Britain. In addition, there was no revalorisation of
minima and maxima of NI SCS pay bands and these remained frozen at their
2008 levels, although they were increased by 1.5 per cent for the GB SCS, in
accordance with our recommendation. However, while the GB SCS received
an overall base pay increase of 2.3 per cent (individual awards were again
varied according to performance), the pay bill for the SCS in Northern Ireland
was increased by 3.5 per cent. At the time, the Finance Minister announced
that the pay package “will cost £1.1 million less [in 2009-10] than if the Northern
Ireland Civil Service had applied the pay award made to senior civil servants in
Great Britain”22.
3.9 As explained in Chapter 2, Permanent Secretaries’ posts in the NI SCS
are in Pay Band 3 unlike those in Great Britain which are in a separate pay
grouping above Pay Band 3. The head of the NI Civil Service discusses the
performance of Permanent Secretaries with Ministers and presents pay
recommendations to the independently chaired Permanent Secretary
Remuneration Committee which then makes decisions.
3.10 During oral evidence sessions and in written evidence, we heard that a
significant number of the SCS are paid towards the bottom of their pay scales.
This can be seen in Table 3.4 above which shows that median salaries in
Northern Ireland are significantly lower than in Great Britain.
Bonuses
3.11 Bonuses were funded from a percentage of the pay bill, currently 8.6 per
cent, which was set aside for that purpose. They were taxable and non-
consolidated (i.e. they did not count towards the calculation of pension benefits
and were paid for one year only). The bonus pot was built up over eight years,
using money that could otherwise have been used for consolidated pay.
22 Northern Ireland Executive news release, 10 August 2009 No payments for Senior Civil Servants. Available at: http://www.northernireland.gov.uk/news/news-dfp/news-dfp-august-2009/news-dfp-090809-no-bonus-payments.htm
22
3.12 All NI SCS members were eligible to receive bonus awards and until
2008 75 per cent did so. This was part of the design of the original scheme:
bonuses were intended to be part of the pay of average performers. Only those
who fell below an acceptable level would not receive a bonus. Thus bonuses
were simply a form of performance-related pay. They were not restricted to the
very best performers because it was thought that would be divisive and
demotivating for those who were performing satisfactorily. Nevertheless,
bonuses were intended to be varied so that the best performers received
significantly larger amounts than those who performance was merely adequate.
As with base pay, there seems in practice to have been less differentiation
between outstanding and other performers in Northern Ireland compared to
Great Britain.
3.13 In 2008-09, the cost of bonus payments made to the NI SCS was £1.2
million out of a total pay bill of £15 million. As part of the 2008 pay award,
around 25 per cent of the Northern Ireland SCS in Pay bands 1 and 2 received
£10,500, another 25 per cent received £7,500 and 25 per cent received £5,000.
In the same year all Permanent Secretaries received individual bonuses of
between £5,000 and £13,000. In 2009, following intense media and public
interest in the payment of bonuses at a time of increasing economic difficulties,
the NI Executive decided not to pay bonus awards to the SCS for that year
while members of the SCS in other parts of the UK continued to have access to
bonus awards.
3.14 While many in the NI SCS recognised the advantages of an average
consolidated pay increase of 3.5 per cent, particularly when their mainland
counterparts were awarded an average pay increase of 2.3 per cent, some felt
let down and were concerned that in future years pay decisions could result in
no bonus as well as no, or little, increase in base pay. The Head of the NI Civil
Service told us that bonuses were not acceptable in the current economic
climate and that the SCS do not feel motivated by the current bonus
arrangements. However, he believed that there should be some mechanism
for rewarding good performance.
23
Pension
3.15 Pension arrangements for members of the NI SCS are provided through
the Principal Pension Scheme (Northern Ireland). The scheme is similar to that
in operation for civil servants in the rest of the UK. A final salary pension
scheme is available for all those who joined the NI civil service before 30 July
2007. For those joining after this date, pension provision is based on career
average earnings. The statutory arrangements are unfunded with the cost of
benefits met by monies voted by Parliament each year.
3.16 New joiners on or after 1 October 2002 may opt for a “Partnership”
account instead. This is a money purchase stakeholder arrangement with an
employer contribution. Retirement income is provided by an annuity bought
with the partnership pension account ‘pot’.
3.17 Members of the NI SCS we met valued their pension arrangements
which are generally considered more generous than those available to
employees in the private sector.
Pay progression 3.18 The terms of reference for this review require our recommendations to
inform decisions on future SCS pay arrangements so that they:
“provide appropriate arrangements for salary progression to ensure that competent employees meet target rates in a reasonable period of time”.
3.19 Individual pay uplifts can be in the range 0 to 9 per cent within the overall
base pay increase. However, awards among the SCS in Northern Ireland have
tended to be towards the bottom of the range, because of a reluctance to use a
wide range of awards to differentiate significantly between highest and lowest
performers, and consequently pay progression to reward NI SCS members’
growing skills and experience is slow, even for the highest performers. As
discussed above, a combination of successive low pay uplifts and increases to
pay band minima and maxima has resulted in most NI SCS members still being
paid towards the bottom of their pay scales. Median pay levels are relatively
close to the minima of pay bands.
24
3.20 In an attempt to address some of the structural issues in the pay
structure, namely poor progression for those at the bottom of the pay bands
and overlap with the maximum of the Grade 6 pay scales which was resulting in
the lowest paid in the NI SCS being overtaken in pay terms by their
subordinates, an increase in base pay of £1,000 was awarded in 2008 to
members of Pay Band 1 with 5 years plus service and who were earning less
than £62,407. The increase was funded from a reduction in the bonus pot and
benefited around 20 staff. However, several members of the SCS told us they
are still close to the bottom of their pay scales despite being in the SCS for a
number of years. We also heard of those transferring from the Northern Ireland
Office this year being doubly disadvantaged by not being able to benefit from
the £1,000 consolidated increase, nor the 3.5 per cent base pay increase
awarded to NI SCS for 2008-09. However, we understand that this group had
access to bonus awards in 2009 and 2010, the latter having been agreed
before the devolution of policing and justice.
3.21 The length of the pay bands creates an expectation that the SCS will
move steadily towards the maximum but the reality is that progression within a
pay band is slow. We heard from one member of the SCS who said that his
salary was around £3,300 above the minimum of his pay scale despite being in
his current grade for five years and receiving good performance ratings. The
majority of those to whom we spoke discussed the demotivational effect of this:
poor pay progression is seen by many as their biggest complaint about their
pay and performance arrangements. The differentiated awards described in
the preceding paragraph were a first step towards addressing slow pay
progression. More needs to be done, though as noted above, the purpose of
the current broad bands is not understood and the high maxima can create
unrealistic expectations.
Recruitment and retention 3.22 At 1 January 2010 there were 25 vacancies in the Northern Ireland SCS,
18 of which were being covered by temporary promotion. The most recent
Annual Report of the Civil Service Commissioners for Northern Ireland noted
25
that 21 appointments were made in 2008-09, 19 filled by internal candidates
and two by external candidates.
3.23 The Civil Service Commissioners for Northern Ireland chair all external
competitions for appointments to the Senior Civil Service. In evidence to us
they reported that the quality of successful candidates for advertised posts is
good and that there appear to be sufficient numbers of appointable candidates
for the more generic posts involving policy roles. However, recruiting for some
specific professional posts has proved more difficult, with the higher salaries
available in the private and wider public sectors cited as the main reason. This
evidence is corroborated by Department of Finance and Personnel officials who
reported that, while in the main there are sufficient applications for SCS posts,
difficulties exist in recruiting for some specialist posts, such as legislative
draftsmen where the level of starting salary appears to be the barrier to
recruitment. We also heard evidence of difficulties in recruiting other
specialists, in particular finance staff and, increasingly, HR specialists.
3.24 As shown in Table 3.5 below, the main reason for leaving the Northern
Ireland SCS is retirement (including early retirement) while the number of
resignations has remained in single figures for several years. Leavers
represent on average 7.8 per cent of the NI SCS workforce over each of the
last five years, a lower percentage than for the SCS in Great Britain (9.7 per
cent on average). However, the Head of the Civil Service in Northern Ireland
informed us that four members of the civil service in the finance specialism had
recently left to join organisations in the wider public sector.
26
Table 3.5: Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service exits by reasons for departure, 2004-05 – 2008-09
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-091 Totals Resignation 2 1 0 7 2 12 Retirement 7 6 4 5 10 32 Early Retirement 3 9 8 8 3 31 Health 1 2 0 0 1 4 Other 1 0 3 2 0 6 Total 14 18 15 22 16 85 Sources: HRConnect, Northern Ireland Human Resource Management System Notes: 1 2009 data sourced from HRConnect, previous years’ data sourced from HRMS. 2 The figures exclude the GB SCS members (in the Northern Ireland Office) who transferred to the NI SCS in April 2010.
3.25 Apart from some specialist posts, there appears to be little problem with
recruitment and retention. However, the picture could be starting to change.
One Permanent Secretary reported that the quality of the field to fill a Pay Band
1 vacancy had been poor. He also said that graduates were leaving the civil
service to join the private sector. He believed this was because of the lack of
promotion prospects, but the figures in Table 3.5 do not appear to show a
problem for the SCS, with resignations averaging fewer than two per year
between 2004 and 2009. There appears to have been no particular reason for
the higher figure in 2007-08 but we understand that five of the seven leavers
that year went to the wider public sector and only one joined the private sector.
Overlap with Grade 6 3.26 The civil service feeder grades for the SCS are Grades 6 and 7. There
is no overlap in Northern Ireland between the maximum of the Grade 7 pay
scale and the minimum of the Pay Band 1 pay scale but the Grade 6 maximum
is more than £5,000 higher than the Pay Band 1 minimum. As described
above, an attempt was made in 2008 to tackle the issue of overlap with a
financial adjustment awarded to the lowest paid members of Pay Band 1.
3.27 We have discussed the issue of overlap in pay between members of our
remit group and their feeder grades in our annual reports on senior pay. While
it is common for pay ranges to overlap, it can raise issues which need careful
27
management. For example, we heard of a person recently promoted from
Grade 6 to the SCS who is being paid at a higher rate than longer serving
members of the SCS. Also, we were told that women tend to be promoted to
the SCS from Grade 7 rather than from Grade 6 and so start their SCS careers
on lower salaries than many male colleagues, a potentially discriminatory effect
of the current pay structure. In the past we have recommended and the
Government has accepted that SCS members should receive at least 10 per
cent increase in pay on promotion. This was intended to reflect the increase in
responsibility. However, we must now reconsider whether that
recommendation should continue to apply since it may have the effect of
reinforcing indirectly discriminatory differences between individuals’ pay.
3.28 Another reason for the lower pay of some women joining the SCS is that
they are more likely to have taken time out of the workplace for caring
responsibilities and hence to be lower in their pay scales when they join the
SCS. Again, the 10 per cent increase on promotion rule could have the effect
of perpetuating lower levels of pay for such people.
Pay of comparators 3.29 During this review, we considered the pay of comparators in the SCS in
Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland. We also sought information on pay in
the wider public and private sectors in Northern Ireland although it was difficult
to find reliable figures on pay for people at levels comparable to the SCS.
Better evidence in this area is needed for future reviews of NI SCS pay.
3.30 For the NICS, the proposal to link public sector pay to that of the local
pay market challenges the long-held principle of pay parity with the GB Civil
Service. However, in its evidence to us, the Northern Ireland Committee for
Finance and Personnel said:
“The Committee was also concerned that the pay and bonus arrangements for SCS staff in the NICS simply mirrored those of Whitehall departments, and did not take account of local economic conditions.”
28
3.31 The Department of Finance and Personnel produces regular updates to
the technical annex of its Pay and Workforce Plan23 in which it draws on the
Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE) to report on the public and
private sector pay differentials of key occupational groups. However, the
picture is not clear. For example, data for Corporate Managers (who include
the SCS) in Northern Ireland show that the public sector differential “declined
considerably” from the period 2005–2007 to 2006–200824 but “increased
considerably” over the period 2006–2008 to 2007-200925. Another difficulty is
that the public and private sectors differ from each other in their workforce
profile (employees in each sector differ in terms of age, experience,
qualifications and levels of education) and when considering some SCS roles,
such as policy development, it is difficult to find equivalent private sector roles.
The difficulty is illustrated by figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies26
which show that raw public-private sector pay differentials in Northern Ireland in
2006 to 2009 are 24 per cent for men and 31 per cent for women but when
differences in the employee characteristics listed above are taken into
consideration, the figures drop to 5 per cent for men and 12 per cent for
women.
3.32 Most private sector companies in Northern Ireland are small and often
family-owned. A representative of the CBI pointed out to us that it is likely that
only the largest companies will be in competition with the civil service for senior
staff and that there is very little interchange of staff at that level between the
civil service and the private sector. He was aware of only one individual from
the private sector moving to the public sector before returning some five years
later.
23 Department of Finance and Personnel. Pay and Workforce Plan 2007-08. Available at: http://www.dfpni.gov.uk/pay_and_workforce_strategy_07.pdf 24 Department of Finance and Personnel. 2009-10 Northern Ireland Public Sector Pay and Workforce Technical Annex. Available at: http://www.dfpni.gov.uk/2009-10_pay_and_workforce_technical_annex.pdf 25 Department of Finance and Personnel. 2010-11 Northern Ireland Public Sector Pay and Workforce Technical Annex. Available at: http://www.dfpni.gov.uk/2010-11-pay-and-workforce-technical-annex.pdf 26 The Institute for Fiscal Studies. The IFS Green Budget February 2010, Section 9, Table 9.4. Available at: http://www.ifs.org.uk/budgets/gb2010/gb2010.pdf
29
3.33 PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) have previously benchmarked pay at
Pay Band 1 and Pay Band 2 levels and we asked them to provide benchmark
data on these grades to inform our review. Table 3.6 below shows median
salary data for Pay Bands 1 and 2 and comparators in private sector
organisations in 2009.
Table 3.6: Comparison of NI SCS and private sector base pay and total remuneration 2009
Sources: PwC, DFPNI, OME
Pay Band 1
Comparator in “holistic”¹ NI private sector organisation
Comparator in large² NI private sector organisation
Pay Band 2
Comparator in “holistic”¹ NI private sector organisation
Comparator in large² NI private sector organisation
Median base salary
£65,177 £60,000 £90,000 £92,752 £73,500 £115,000
Median total remuneration³
£79,516 £85,500 £130,500 £113,157 £106,725 £170,000
Notes 1. PwC use the term “holistic” to refer to organisations of all sizes and degrees of complexity. 2. Large companies are complex organisations with more than 1,000 employees. 3. Includes basic salary, pension, bonus, and car allowance but not ‘sundries’ such as medical insurance, nor share options – PwC comment that the latter are not as common in NI as elsewhere in the UK. The SCS received no bonus awards in 2009. The assumed average value of the SCS pension is 22% of salary – the actual value will depend on age and the scheme to which each SCS member belongs but the Towers Watson report of February 2010 assumed an average age of 50 to arrive at the 22% figure.
3.34 The table above indicates that median base pay of the NI SCS is higher
than that of comparators in all private sector organisations in PwC’s survey but
lower when considering the pay of comparators in large organisations (complex
private sector organisations with more than 1,000 employees). When total
remuneration is considered, the pay of the NI SCS Pay Band 1 is lower than
comparators in all surveyed organisations and markedly lower than private
sector comparators in large organisations. Total remuneration for Pay Band 2
is only slightly higher than for comparators in all surveyed private organisations
and markedly lower than those in large organisations.
3.35 The Civil Service Commissioners also reported that SCS salaries for the
most senior posts are generally perceived to be lower than those for
comparative jobs in the private sector and elsewhere, and, as reported earlier,
30
they have had difficulties in attracting applicants for some professional or
specialist posts which attract higher salaries in the private sector.
3.36 This evidence tends to contradict that in Sir David Varney’s report27,
although Sir David was looking at pay across the whole of the public sector. Sir
David found that:
“the public sector in Northern Ireland still pays on average 19 per cent more than the private sector – in contrast the public sector pays on average 1 per cent less in the UK as a whole. Further, … there is a particularly high wage differential at more senior civil service levels. The difference is largely due to the fact that private sector wages in Northern Ireland are below UK levels, while public sector pay tends to follow UK public sector average. 7.19 This implies that the public sector is paying a wage much higher than is necessary to get the workers it needs, especially given the geographical constraints which make it unlikely that most public sector workers would switch to jobs outside Northern Ireland if the wage differential were reduced over time. While the precise dynamics of the relationship between private and public sector pay are complex, it is clearly inefficient for the public sector to pay wages that are higher than necessary. 7.20 Such a high differential has serious consequences for the private sector, reducing its attractiveness to workers, and particularly to the most talented and highest skilled in senior level jobs. Ultimately, workers will, to a large extent, choose jobs on the basis of the wages offered, and a differential of the size that exists in Northern Ireland, combined with other public sector benefits such as flexible hours and pensions, make it more difficult for the private sector to compete for the most highly skilled workers.”
We have not been able to find any evidence to bear out Sir David’s assertion
that “there is a particularly high wage differential at more senior civil service
levels”. We have found no data to suggest that SCS pay levels are higher than
those in the private sector for comparable jobs. The evidence from PwC cited
above rather suggests the opposite. Moreover, SCS pay levels (as measured
by median salaries) are significantly lower in Northern Ireland than in Great
Britain: the difference is approximately -12 per cent at Pay Band 1, -9 per cent
at Pay Band 2 and -21 per cent at Pay Band 3.
3.37 Data supplied to us by the Department of Finance and Personnel and
summarised at Annex E indicate that the median base salaries of each NI SCS
pay band are broadly in line with those of comparators in the wider public
27 Sir David Varney. Review of the Competitiveness of Northern Ireland, April 2008. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/ varney_review300408.pdf
31
sector.
3.38 In 2010, the pay of senior civil servants in the Republic of Ireland was
reduced following recommendations made by the Review Body on Higher
Remuneration in the Public Sector28 which also recommended freezing pay
until 2012 “at the earliest” for groups within its remit and a suspension, until
2012, of performance–related awards. As can be seen from Table 3.7 below,
salary levels available to senior civil servants and the feeder grade in the
Republic of Ireland tend to be higher than those available to those in similar
posts in the senior civil service in Northern Ireland.
Table 3.7: Salaries of Senior Civil Servants in the Republic of Ireland
Salary wef 1 September 2008 Salary wef 1 January 2010 Grade
€
Equivalent in £ using Purchasing Power Parity at 1.491
€
Equivalent in £ using Purchasing Power Parity at 1.422
Secretary General €221,929 £148,946 €188,640 £132,845
Deputy Secretary €177,547 £119,159 €168,000 £118,310
Assistant Secretary
€131,748 - €150,712
£88,421 - £101,149
€127,796 - €146,191
£89,997 - £102,951
Principal3 (Higher)
€92,730 - €114,366
£62,235 - £76,756
€85,957 - €105,429
£60,533 - £74,246
Sources: Department of Finance, Republic of Ireland; OECD Notes: 1. PPP in 2008. 2. PPP in 2009 (estimate). 3. The post of Principal is the Republic of Ireland Senior Civil Service feeder grade.
On the assumption that Secretary General broadly equates to NI Permanent
Secretary, Deputy Secretary to Pay Band 2 and Assistant Secretary to Pay
Band 1, these figures suggest that Irish senior civil servants are still paid
significantly more, even after the recent pay cuts, than those in Northern
Ireland, after allowing for differences in the cost of living. (The difference is
even greater if salaries are converted using the current exchange rate rather 28 Review Body On Higher Remuneration In The Public Sector. Report No. 44 to the Minister for Finance on the levels of remuneration currently appropriate to certain posts covered by the Review Body. September 2009. Available at: http://www.reviewbody.gov.ie/Documents/Report%2044.pdf
32
than Purchasing Power Parities which take account of differences in the cost of
living in different countries.)
Diversity 3.39 The NI Civil Service’s employment equality and diversity plan29 and its
progress report30 provide the following diversity figures for the NI SCS
workforce:
Table 3.8: Composition of the Northern Ireland SCS1
1 January 2008 1 January 2009
% %
Protestant: 56.0 51.0
Roman Catholic 37.5 37.0
Male 72.6 69.6
Female 27.4 30.4
Disability2 3.6 3.5
Ethnic Minority2 1.2 1.2 1 This includes staff at Grade 5 and above in general service grades and analogous grades in other occupational groups 2 The figures for disability and ethnic minority relate to those staff who have chosen to declare this information for equal opportunities monitoring purposes.
3.40 Under Article 55 of the Fair Employment and Treatment (NI) Order
199831, all registered employers in Northern Ireland are required to review the
workforce composition of Protestants and Roman Catholics and ensure that
there is fair participation of both communities in the workplace. The NI Civil
Service’s progress report says that although there has been under-
representation in the past of Roman Catholics at senior levels in the SCS, there
is now fair participation and evidence suggests that recent SCS appointments
closely match the community background of the 2001 census. 29 Department of Finance and Personnel. Northern Ireland Civil Service Employment Equality and Diversity Plan 2008 to 2011. Available at: http://www.dfpni.gov.uk/nics_employment_equality_and_diversity_plan_-_september_2008.pdf 30 Department of Finance and Personnel. Northern Ireland Civil Service Employment Equality and Diversity Plan 2008 to 2011 Progress Report October 2009. Available at: http://www.dfpni.gov.uk/nics-employment-equality-and-diversity-plan-progress-report-october-2009.pdf 31 The Fair Employment and Treatment (Northern Ireland) Order. SI 1998/3162 (NI 21). Available at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1998/98316206.htm#55
33
3.41 During oral evidence sessions we heard that the balance in religions in
the SCS reflects that of the population and although women are
underrepresented in the SCS, we are told that the picture is healthier in the
SCS’s feeder grades.
3.42 The SCS has a leadership role in promoting diversity in the culture of the
civil service. We therefore welcome and support the work being carried out to
improve diversity in the NI Civil Service including training events and the
current review on gender composition in the NI Civil Service compared with the
labour market.
34
Chapter 4 Proposals for a new pay system Our objectives for a new pay system 4.1 In drawing up our proposals for a new pay system for the Northern
Ireland Senior Civil Service (NI SCS) we have paid careful attention to our
terms of reference, and in particular the request to us to bring forward
recommendations so that future SCS pay arrangements:
“(i) meet the needs of the NICS in terms of attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding SCS staff; (ii) provide transparency and robustness in SCS pay and reward decisions, with due regard to the reward and remuneration arrangements elsewhere in the public sector and in the private sector; (iii) address any potential vulnerabilities in the current SCS pay system in respect of equal pay or age discrimination legislation; (iv) promote strong performance management arrangements, ensuring that appropriate incentives are in place to promote and reward high performance and the delivery of business objectives, as well as ensuring that ineffective performance is identified and dealt with appropriately; (v) provide for appropriate arrangements for salary progression to ensure that competent employees meet target rates in a reasonable period of time; and (vi) appropriately reflect both administrative and professional/specialist roles in the SCS.”
We have also had in mind the points made to us both orally and in writing by
members of the NI SCS, notably:
• their desire for an independent, stable system of pay determination, not
subject to arbitrary interference;
• their desire for real pay progression.
Finally we were concerned to design a system which, in addition to meeting the
above criteria, achieves the best value for money for the taxpayer and avoids
35
distorting effects on the wider labour market, both public and private, in
Northern Ireland.
Performance-related pay 4.2 The current pay system, described in Chapter 3, contains two distinct
elements of performance-related pay: base pay increases and bonuses, both
of which are in principle differentiated according to performance. We consider
that the attempt to distinguish between two types of performance – long-term
improvement in skills which justified a base pay increase and short-term
achievement of objectives which justified a non-consolidated bonus – has failed
because it was poorly understood and difficult to operate.
4.3 Nevertheless, we think any SCS pay system should contain a significant
element of performance-related pay for the following reasons:
• it is right in principle that those who perform better than their colleagues
should be paid more;
• performance-related pay is an essential part of a performance
management system: it enables management to send signals about an
organisation’s priorities and the sort of behaviour and leadership it
expects from senior managers, to reward those who best respond to
those signals and warn those who fail to do so; and
• performance-related pay can have an incentive effect, helping
organisations to perform better, although we accept that this effect may
be weaker in the SCS, where people tend to be motivated more by a
public service ethos than by money.
4.4 The bonus element of the current NI SCS pay system had some
advantages, not least that the reward for good performance during the previous
year was a one-off, non-consolidated and non-pensionable payment which had
to be earned anew each year. This helped to reduce the cost of final salary
36
pensions. It also sent signals to higher performers that their departments
recognised and valued their contributions. However, the system suffered from
various disadvantages, perhaps the most serious of which was the fact that, at
least initially, 75 per cent of NI SCS members were eligible for bonuses. It was
hard to explain why half of the below-average performers should receive a
bonus in addition to basic salary. Although the bonus pot had been built up
using money that could otherwise have been used for base pay increases, it
appeared to the public that most NI SCS members were receiving additional
payments, over and above their salaries, simply for doing the job. The reality
was more complicated than that: as explained in Chapter 3, the bonus scheme
had to be seen in the context of the whole system. In the system from 2002
automatic pay increments had been abolished and all pay increases and
bonuses were dependent on, and graduated according to, relative
performance. This meant that the top performers received most but the solid
middle tranche also received something, since these are the people who deliver
much of the work. Nevertheless, the SCS bonus scheme has fallen into
disrepute in both Great Britain and Northern Ireland, partly because of largely
unfounded comparisons with bonus systems in the financial services sector, but
partly, too, because it was very difficult to justify payment of bonuses to
managers of organisations which were perceived as performing poorly. We
understand why the Executive decided to suspend bonuses for the NI SCS in
2009 and we do not believe it would be realistic to propose restoring them. We
need to find another way of providing an incentive and reward for high
performance.
Our proposals for a new system 4.5 We therefore propose a new system in which members of the SCS will
not receive bonuses. These are the main features of the new scheme we
propose:
• replacement of the three existing very broad pay bands (see Table 3.4
above) with much shorter, ten point pay scales, where a consistently
top performer can receive an increase of two pay progression steps
each year and thus reach the top of the scale in five years, and an
37
average performer receiving one progression step each year may do so
in 10 years. The bottom 40 per cent in any one year will not move up
the scale at the end of that year although they could receive a pay
increase if the scale is revalorised as a result of the annual pay review;
• the opportunity to earn non-consolidated, performance-related
payments for exceptional performers who have reached the top of the
scale; and
• recruitment and retention premia to be available for posts in
specialisms which could not otherwise be filled at normal rates. The
use of such premia should be subject to the approval of a remuneration
committee in line with the recommendations in our Initial report on
public sector senior remuneration32.
Performance-related pay scales 4.6 We recommend that in future, for those paid below the maxima of the
new scales, there should be performance-related annual pay progression. The
top 10 per cent of performers should move up two steps on the scale (or to the
top if they are only one step away). The next 50 per cent of performers should
move up a single pay progression step. Thus a consistently top performer
could move from the minimum of the scale to the maximum in five years, while
a consistently average performer (i.e. those from the 11th to the 60th percentile
of the performance distribution) would do so in 10 years. The balance of NI
SCS members in any given year would not move up the scale though they
could receive pay increases if the scales were revalorised (see below).
However, we believe that any NI SCS members those whose performance
merits the imposition of a performance improvement plan or similar measure,
should receive no pay increase at all, even if the scale is revalorised, unless
and until their performance improves.
32 Review Body on Senior Salaries. Report no. 74, Initial Report on Public Sector Senior Remuneration 2010. Cm 7848
38
4.7 Our recommended pay scales are as follows:
Recommendation 1: We recommend the following pay scales to replace the existing pay structure:
Pay Band 1 Pay Band 2 Pay Band 3
Minimum 57,300 81,600 98,059 59,320 84,100 101,000 61,340 86,600 104,000 63,360 89,100 107,000 65,380 91,600 110,000 67,400 94,100 113,000 69,420 96,600 116,000 71,440 99,100 119,000 73,460 101,600 122,000 75,480 104,100 125,000 Maximum 77,500 107,000 128,000
As shown by Table 4.1 below, most members of each pay band are currently
paid well below the proposed new maxima and will thus have the opportunity to
benefit from the new progression system.
Table 4.1: NI SCS lower quartile, median and upper quartile pay, 2010
Pay Band 1 £
Pay Band 2 £
Pay Band 3 £
Lower quartile 61,274 87,559 103,441
Median 65,126 91,819 105,033
Upper quartile 69,445 97,459 111,485
Recommendation 2: We recommend that, for those below the maximum of the pay scale:
• the top 10 per cent of performers move up two steps on the scales (or to the maximum if they are one step away); and
• the next 50 per cent of performers move up one step on the scale.
39
Recommendation 3: We recommend that the pay of any Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service members whose performance merits the imposition of a performance improvement plan or similar measure, should remain frozen, even when the pay scale is revalorised, unless and until their performance improves.
4.8 We have set the bottom of the scales at the same level as the current
minima. All the evidence that we have seen points to there being no problem
with recruiting or retaining members of the SCS in Northern Ireland, with the
exception of a few specialist posts. We therefore see no need to increase the
pay band minima at this time. However, we are aware that the Grade 6 scale
substantially overlaps the Pay Band 1 scale we have proposed and this may
cause problems because those promoted to the SCS from Grade 6 may
leapfrog those who have been in the SCS for some time. This is undesirable
and could lead to equal pay claims. The problem could become worse if the
Grade 6 scale were to be increased by the current pay and grading review of
the NICS below SCS level. We therefore suggest that any review of pay for
grades below pay band 1 should seek to avoid exacerbating the problem.
4.9 In Northern Ireland those promoted to or within the SCS currently
receive a pay increase of at least 10 per cent. We now consider that this rule
should no longer apply in Northern Ireland because of the distortions and legal
problems it may cause. Instead we recommend that those promoted should
move to the lowest point of the scale to which they have been promoted that is
above their current salary. This may be the scale minimum in some cases.
Recommendation 4: We recommend that those promoted to or within the Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service move to the lowest point of the scale to which they have been promoted that is above their current salary.
4.10 Approximately a tenth of the NI SCS are currently paid above the
maxima of our proposed new scales. We recommend that those people should
40
have their base pay increased by the same percentage as any revalorisation of
the relevant scale (or of the top point of that scale if the increase is not uniform)
provided that their performance in the year immediately preceding the increase
has been at least satisfactory. They would also be eligible for non-consolidated
performance awards in the same way as those at the top of their scale (see
below).
Recommendation 5: We recommend that members of the Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service who are paid above the maximum of the new pay scales should have their base pay increased by the same percentage as any revalorisation of the relevant scale (or of the top point of that scale if the increase is not uniform), provided that their performance in the year immediately preceding the increase has been at least satisfactory.
Non-consolidated performance awards 4.11 Under our proposed new system, many more people will reach the top of
their pay scale. There must be some incentive for these people to maintain
their levels of performance. We therefore recommend that those at the top of
their scale or already paid above the new maximum should be eligible for non-
consolidated performance awards. These should be limited to the best
performers. We recommend that up to 25 per cent of those not eligible for pay
progression steps should be able to receive non-consolidated performance
awards of up to 5 per cent of the individual’s salary. These awards would not
be pensionable.
Recommendation 6: We recommend that up to 25 per cent of the best performers who are either at the top of their pay scales or paid above the new maximum and therefore not eligible for pay progression steps be eligible for non-consolidated and non-pensionable performance awards of up to 5 per cent of their salary.
41
Assimilation to pay scales 4.12 We recommend that assimilation to the new scales should take place on
1 April 2011. Anyone whose current pay corresponds exactly to a scale point
on the new scale should continue on that rate while all others will move to the
next scale point above their current rate. (As noted above, those currently paid
above the new scale maxima will mark time.) We estimate that this will cost 1.3
per cent of the current pay bill. However, this is more than offset by the saving
from no longer paying bonuses. When bonuses were last paid in 2008, the
cost was 8.6 per cent of the pay bill. Even taking account of the 3.5 per cent
increase in base pay in 2009, the NI SCS have effectively had an average pay
cut of around 5 per cent since then because of the abolition of bonuses and the
pay bill on a like-for-like basis will still be significantly lower in cash terms after
assimilation than if bonuses had continued to be paid.
Recommendation 7: We recommend that assimilation to the new pay scales take place on 1 April 2011 and that:
• those whose current pay corresponds exactly to a scale point continue on that rate;
• those whose current pay is above the maximum scale point continue on that rate; and
• all others move to the next scale point above their current rate.
Revalorisation of scales – determining SCS pay 4.13 We strongly believe that the pay of the SCS in Northern Ireland should
be set on the basis of objective, evidence-based procedures. Inevitably, SCS
pay is highly visible to the media and is a matter of political concern. In
previous reports on our remit groups we have discussed the difficulties in taking
corrective action on pay, even when justified by evidence, and pointed out that
given the small numbers in our remit groups, and particularly the number of
SCS in Northern Ireland, the level of settlements has little effect on the public
sector pay bill and wider economy. But while pay should be set taking account
42
of the wider political and economic environment, it is only in the most
exceptional circumstances that political considerations should be allowed to
override all others.33 We accept that those circumstances obtained in 2009-10,
while the recession was at its worst, when the Northern Ireland Executive
suspended the SCS bonus scheme but awarded an increase of 3.5 per cent in
base pay34. For 2010-11 we recommend no increase in SCS pay and no
payment of bonuses. We realise that this will be a disappointment to SCS
members but, as noted above, we have seen no evidence to suggest that an
increase is currently necessary for recruitment, retention or motivation. SCS
salaries are well within the top 10 per cent of earnings in Northern Ireland.
Hitherto employment in the SCS has been much more secure than in the
private sector and most SCS members have had final salary pensions. Inflation
as measured by the Retail Prices Index was negative during much of 2009
although it has spiked up recently, in part because of the return of the VAT rate
to 17.5 per cent.
Recommendation 8: We recommend that for 2010-11 there be no increase in Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service pay.
Recommendation 9: We recommend that the current bonus scheme, suspended by the Executive in 2009, be discontinued.
4.14 In future years there could be pay increases for the SCS. We believe
there should be an annual review carried out by an independent body such as
ourselves, taking evidence from the Executive, trade unions and the NI SCS
themselves and looking particularly at recruitment, retention and motivation, as
well as at affordability and the broader economic context. We already have
some experience of the Northern Ireland labour market through regularly
recommending on the pay of the judiciary and we also carried out a one-off
33 The UK Government gave such an undertaking in 1971 when it set up the first independent pay review bodies. 34 This was the average increase. Since increases were modulated by performance, some will have received more and others less than this but we understand most increases were close to this figure.
43
study of senior health service managers in Northern Ireland. There may be
another body suitable to carry out this task, but whoever does it, the Northern
Ireland Executive should undertake to accept its independent recommendations
in all but the most exceptional circumstances. This is necessary to ensure that
the SCS have confidence that their pay will be set fairly and objectively and not
for political expedience.
Recommendation 10: We recommend that an independent body such as the Review Body on Senior Salaries should review Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service pay annually and that the Northern Ireland Executive undertake to accept its independent recommendations in all but the most exceptional circumstances.
4.15 The new pay system will need to be monitored carefully to ensure that it
is not creating unintended upward pay drift (i.e. that the pay bill is not
increasing year on year simply because of people moving up the pay scale).
Our estimates below suggest that this will not be the case, but it will depend to
some extent on the pattern of leavers and joiners. If highly paid leavers are
replaced by people paid at the bottom of the scale while others progress
through the scales at the rates we have suggested, then the system should be
cost neutral, at least after a few years, but this will need to be monitored. If
problems in recruitment or retention emerge, then the scales could be
revalorised, either by applying a uniform percentage increase or possibly more
targeted adjustments. If, on the other hand and against our expectations,
progression through the pay scales generated a net cost, and there was no
new money available, this would need to be dealt with by reducing the
proportion of people receiving performance-related increases or non-
consolidated awards.
Recommendation 11: We recommend that the new pay system be monitored carefully to ensure that it is not creating unintended upward pay drift and that it remains affordable.
44
Recruitment and retention premia 4.16 The evidence suggests that the above scales will be sufficient to recruit
and retain well-qualified people for most NI SCS posts, but there may be
difficulties in a few specialist areas. For such posts there should be flexibility to
pay a recruitment and retention premium. The need for and level of such a
premium should be authorised by an independent remuneration committee, as
recommended in our draft code of practice on top-level reward in the public
sector35. We have considered whether to recommend limits for such
payments, but on balance we think this should be left to remuneration
committees to determine, subject to the provisos that the premium should be no
higher than is necessary to recruit and retain suitably qualified individuals
that the premium should cease if the individual moves to another job in the SCS
which does not justify a premium, or if labour market conditions mean it is no
longer necessary. The remuneration committee should therefore revie
continuing recruitment and retention premia every three years. Our
understanding is that where similar allowances are paid to NICS members
below SCS level, they are almost invariably pensionable and we think that
recruitment and retention premia at SCS level should also be pensionable
unless, in specific circumstances, the remuneration committee judges that this
is not necessary or appropriate.
, and
w any
Recommendation 12: We recommend that recruitment and retention premia be available to remunerate specialist roles and that remuneration committees determine the need for and correct level of any such premia.
35 Review Body on Senior Salaries. Report no. 74, Initial Report on Public Sector Senior Remuneration 2010. Cm 7848
45
Recommendation 13: We recommend that payment of a recruitment and retention premium cease if the individual for whom the premium was originally approved moves to another job in the Senior Civil Service that does not justify a premium or if labour market conditions change, rendering it no longer necessary. The remuneration committee should review any continuing premia every three years.
Performance management 4.17 The pay system we have recommended is predicated on a performance
management system that is capable of distinguishing different levels of
performance fairly and objectively, so that decisions on the award of pay
progression steps are well-founded and defensible. We have been assured by
senior managers that the Northern Ireland SCS performance management
system does meet these criteria.
Organisational performance 4.18 One of the criticisms of the system of SCS bonuses was that the same
proportion of SCS members received bonuses across the whole of the SCS,
regardless of the relative performance of different organisations or parts of
organisations. This is a difficult issue to address because there is, at present,
no satisfactory method of measuring the performance of different bodies within
the civil service. Moreover, even where a body is clearly underperforming, that
may be due to factors outside the control of the current SCS managers. We
therefore make no general recommendation on this subject but leave it to
remuneration committees to consider whether, in specific circumstances,
performance-related awards for the NI SCS in under-performing departments,
agencies or parts of those organisations should be restricted or suspended for
a period.
46
Recommendation 14: We recommend that remuneration committees consider whether, in specific circumstances, performance–related awards for members of the Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service in under-performing departments, agencies or parts of those organisations should be restricted or suspended for a period.
Age discrimination 4.19 We have taken legal advice on whether our proposed pay scales are
compatible with equality legislation and in particular law against age
discrimination. We believe our proposed system can be justified as meeting
business needs. The differential award of pay progression steps (two, one or
none each year) provides an incentive to better performance and helps to retain
the best performers who will have progressed most quickly through the scales.
This system is clearly very different to one in which progression is wholly
dependent on length of service in the grade.
Costs of our proposals 4.20 The effects (positive and negative) on pay bill of moving to the new pay
system come from four causes. The costs and savings can be roughly
estimated from the existing pay structure:
• as described above, the cost of adjusting all the salaries within the scale to
the next scale point is estimated at 1.3 per cent of the existing pay bill;
• the cost of awarding seven performance pay progression steps per ten
people who are below the maximum (i.e.10 per cent receiving two pay
progression steps and 50 per cent receiving one pay progression step) each
year is estimated at 1.6 per cent of pay bill;
• the cost of paying non-consolidated performance awards for the top 25 per
cent of those who have reached the new maximum on the pay scale or are
paid above the maximum (capped at 5 per cent of each individual’s salary)
is estimated at 0.2 per cent of pay bill; and
• the saving from the replacement of higher paid SCS members who retire or
resign with lower paid new entrants to the pay bands: this has averaged
47
around 1.8 per cent of pay bill in recent years, although this figure is volatile
because of the very small numbers (less than 10 per cent of the SCS –
fewer than 20 people a year on average – see Table 3.5 above).
4.21 Therefore, the total effect on pay bill is estimated as 1.3 per cent in the
first year and 0 per cent per year afterwards assuming that the number of posts
remains constant and that turnover follows the same pattern as for the last few
years. In other words, the new system should become roughly cost neutral
from the second year. This calculation of course excludes any revalorisation of
the new salary scales, but it does suggest that the new system is unlikely to
result in pay drift after the first year, and that small amount of drift is offset
several times over by the saving from ending the current bonus system.
Effect of our proposals on motivation 4.22 We have considered how our proposals may affect the motivation of NI
SCS members. We recognise that there is likely to be some disappointment
with aspects of our proposals, notably the recommendations to reduce the
maxima of the current pay bands, to freeze pay this year and reduce the
proportion of the SCS who can receive performance-related increases.
However, we believe that this should be balanced by recognition that there will
be more certain pay progression for the top 60 per cent of performers through
annual, consolidated, performance-related increases to base pay, and that all
but the very lowest performers whose performance merits the imposition of a
performance improvement plan or similar measure will receive increases when
the pay scales are revalorised. Our recommendation for an independent pay
review mechanism will, if accepted, help to take SCS pay out of the political
arena.
4.23 We acknowledge that our proposals will formalise lower pay rates for NI
SCS compared to those of SCS employed by GB departments (including their
staff based in Northern Ireland) although they will also provide faster and more
certain pay progression for consistently good performers. However, we think
that the economic circumstances in Northern Ireland, including the lower cost of
48
living and the relatively self-contained labour market, justify that somewhat
lower pay.
4.24 Finally, it goes without saying that the effects of our recommendations
should be closely monitored so that any problems or unintended consequences
can quickly be brought to the attention of the independent body that we
propose should advise the Executive on NI SCS pay, and it can then identify
any necessary corrections to the system.
49
50
Annex A Letter from the Minister for Finance and Personnel: terms of reference for the review
51
52
NORTHERN IRELAND CIVIL SERVICE - A REVIEW OF THE PAY SYSTEM FOR SENIOR CIVIL SERVANTS Terms of Reference Background 1. The Northern Ireland Civil Service (NICS) comprises 11 Government
departments and their associated executive agencies. The most senior
officials in the NICS belong to a cadre of staff known as the Senior Civil
Service (SCS). There are approximately 220 members of staff in this
cadre across three distinct grades and pay bands - Grade 5 (Assistant
Secretary), Grade 3 (Deputy Secretary) and Grade 2 (Permanent
Secretary). The staff in this cadre comprise both general administrative
staff (about 75% of the total) and a number of professional staff such as
medical doctors, lawyers, engineers and veterinary professionals.
2. Annual pay strategies and pay awards for all SCS staff in the NICS have
for a number of years been based on the parameters for pay bill growth
and non-consolidated bonus levels recommended for SCS pay in the
civil service in Great Britain by the Independent Senior Salaries Review
Body (SSRB) and agreed/modified by the Government in Westminster.
Within the overall framework for SCS pay recommended by the SSRB
and agreed/modified by the Government, the NICS has determined more
detailed features of its own annual SCS pay strategy and pay award.
Annual strategies and pay awards for SCS staff in the NICS are subject
to the approval of the Minister for Finance and Personnel. In 2009 the
Minister for Finance and Personnel decided that the pay award for SCS
staff should not contain any non-consolidated bonus payments. In 2009
the total pay bill for SCS staffing the NICS was approximately £14m.
Review 3. The Minister for Finance and Personnel, who has responsibility for
issues concerning the management of the NICS, wishes to undertake a
53
review of pay arrangements for SCS staff in the NICS. For the purposes
of this review the NICS comprises the 11 Northern Ireland Government
Departments and their Executive Agencies. The purpose of the review is
to examine the current SCS pay and reward system, making
comparisons with similar jobs in the wider public and private sectors with
a view to bringing forward recommendations to inform decisions on
future SCS pay arrangements so that they:
(i) meet the needs of the NICS in terms of attracting, retaining,
motivating and rewarding SCS staff;
(ii) provide transparency and robustness in SCS pay and reward
decisions, with due regard to the reward and remuneration
arrangements elsewhere in the public sector and in the private
sector;
(iii) address any potential vulnerabilities in the current SCS pay system
in respect of equal pay or age discrimination legislation;
(iv) promote strong performance management arrangements, ensuring
that appropriate incentives are in place to promote and reward high
performance and the delivery of business objectives, as well as ensuring
that ineffective performance is identified and dealt with appropriately;
(v) provide for appropriate arrangements for salary progression to
ensure that competent employees meet target rates in a reasonable
period of time; and
(vi) appropriately reflect both administrative and professional/specialist
roles in the SCS.
54
Outputs 4. The review will be a time-bound piece of work with its main output a final
report to be delivered to the Minister for Finance and Personnel. The
final report should cover the main review outputs:
(i) a review and assessment of the current arrangements for
determining SCS pay and reward in the NICS;
(ii) a review and report of key stakeholders' views, which will include
amongst others the Northern Ireland Assembly's Committee for
Finance and Personnel, the Cabinet Office in Whitehall, the Senior
Salaries Review Body and SCS staff representatives;
(iii) a proportionate review of the arrangements in place for pay and
reward systems for senior civil servants in comparable jobs in Great
Britain, including the other devolved administrations, and the
Republic of Ireland, including the role of the Senior Salaries Review
Body and its possible remit in relation to the NICS;
(iv) consideration of pay and reward systems in comparable jobs in the
wider public sector and the private sector in Northern Ireland and
their comparison with pay and reward systems for the NICS; and
(v) proposals for how the quantum of annual pay awards for SCS staff
in the NICS should be determined.
55
56
Annex B
List of those who gave evidence
Minister for Finance and Personnel
Head of the Northern Ireland Civil Service
Permanent Secretaries (X 3)
Northern Ireland SCS (X 7)
FDA
Roy E Bailie OBE, Chairman, The Baird Group
We also received written evidence from the Committee for Finance and
Personnel, the NI Civil Service Commissioners, the FDA, the Northern Ireland
branch of the Confederation of British Industry and two members of the
Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service.
57
58
Annex C
Code of Practice on top-level reward in the public sector
Preamble It is in the public interest that people of the right ability and experience can be recruited and retained by the public sector to lead and deliver the services and functions that are essential to the nation. They should be motivated to perform at the highest level and should be rewarded appropriately for their achievements. Their rewards should properly reflect the taxpayer’s interest in value for money, high standards of governance and transparency. This Code of Practice is to provide guidance to those responsible for setting senior pay on appointment and subsequently. The Code applies to chief executives and senior executive teams of public sector organisations, regardless of their level of pay, and to other employees receiving more than £100,000 a year in pensionable pay. The principles, if applied properly and proportionately, will ensure that decisions are taken at the right level, are open to scrutiny, and can be publicly justified. The Code is to apply widely across the public sector. Organisations vary greatly in terms of their size, governance and structure. For governance in particular, there are significant differences in the arrangements applying to public corporations, local authorities, Non-Departmental Public Bodies and others – some, for example, do not have external sponsors. Many will readily fit with the Code; others may need to adapt some of the specific provisions to their circumstances. But it is essential that the broad principles underlying the Code are embraced on a mandatory basis to ensure public confidence.
59
60
Glossary Code: refers to this Code of Practice on top-level reward in the public sector Governing body: is the body of elected or appointed persons at the top of an organisation that oversees its activities. Often this is a board (and can be variously named, for example council, board of trustees, board of governors, board of managers, or executive board). For local authorities it may be the Council itself, its cabinet or a senior committee. Some organisations may not have a formal governing body, either because they are too small or because of the manner in which they are constituted. In these cases, references to the governing body shall be taken as referring to whoever at the top of the organisation is charged with its policy and strategic oversight. Independent representative: usually a member of the organisation’s governing body who is independent of or external to its line management structure. Organisations that do not have such membership of their governing body may need to make alternative arrangements for external involvement in their senior remuneration processes. Organisation: refers to any public sector organisation of any size or however constituted. People earning more than £100,000: the Code applies to people working in the organisation who are outside the senior executive team but whose pensionable salary is more than £100,000 a year (though the disclosure requirements are less onerous than for senior executives). Pensionable salary will be considered on an annualised basis, to take into account part-time working. Once the salary criterion is met, the Code provisions apply to the individual’s total remuneration package. Remuneration committee: a committee established by the governing body of an organisation to make determinations on top-level remuneration. It typically comprises two or three independent representatives. Senior executive team: those in a senior management position in the organisation, whether using this description or not – normally including at least the chief executive and his or her senior direct reports. Senior executive: a member of the senior executive team. This term normally includes senior executives employed on an interim basis, unless the period of employment is less than six months. Sponsor: the person or body that exercises oversight over an organisation and acts as guardian of the public interest in respect of its activities. Those carrying out this function include government departments, representative councils, regulators and independent trusts. Not all organisations have a sponsor: where the Code requires provision for escalation to a sponsor, such bodies will need to make appropriate arrangements to recognise the exceptional character of decisions falling outside the applicable pay framework. Top-level reward: reward for those covered by this Code, namely the senior executive team and those earning more than £100,000 a year.
61
62
Principles of top-level reward in the public sector Senior public sector remuneration must provide value for money for the taxpayer and not pay more than is necessary to recruit, retain and motivate suitably qualified staff. All aspects of pay determination should in principle be subject to: independent governance arrangements; objective justification of starting pay and subsequent changes; and appropriate disclosure of reward structures and all elements of reward received.
Governance Delegated authority: top-level reward in public sector organisations must be positioned within a defined pay framework agreed by their sponsor or equivalent. Within that pay framework, governing bodies of organisations have primary responsibility and accountability for top-level reward in the organisation. Independence: individual top-level reward should, where possible, be determined by skilled people of seniority and standing who are independent of management and constitute a free-standing remuneration committee. Escalation: escalation procedures must apply where an organisation exceptionally needs to offer remuneration outside the bounds of its defined pay framework. Contracts of employment: there must be comprehensive contracts of employment that protect the interests of the individual and the organisation.
Remuneration Value for money: remuneration must demonstrably provide value for money in the use of public resources and be no more than is necessary to attract, retain and motivate able staff, on a sustainable basis, to deliver public functions. Total reward: in determining top-level reward, organisations must consider separately the elements of a total reward package – base pay, incentives, pension contributions and any other material benefits. The composition of the reward package must be appropriate to the role and circumstances of the organisation. Payment for performance: performance should normally be the basis of any progression or uplift in base pay. Other elements of performance-related or contingent pay may be used if appropriate to the organisation’s public service mission and helpful in motivating and retaining senior staff.
Disclosure Disclosure of procedures: organisations must demonstrate that their remuneration processes apply the spirit of this Code and its specific provisions as far as possible on a ‘comply or explain’ basis. Their policies, frameworks and governance arrangements for top-level reward should therefore be clearly described and publicly available. Disclosure of remuneration: organisations must disclose annually the total remuneration of individual staff members covered by this Code, the basis of decisions on that remuneration, any exceptions made to established policies and frameworks and any significant changes to those policies and frameworks.
63
Audit: audit procedures must be established and documented that are independent of the remuneration process. A report on compliance with this Code must be included in the organisation’s annual audit report.
64
1. Governance 1.1 Delegated authority
Top-level reward in public sector organisations must be positioned within a defined pay framework agreed by their sponsor or equivalent. Within that pay framework, governing bodies of organisations have primary responsibility and accountability for top-level reward in the organisation.
Guidance • This Code or a comparable set of provisions is an integral part of any scheme
of delegated authority.
• Delegation frameworks must be clear on the degree of delegation, whether national payscales or some form of indicative pay banding are to be used, whether performance-related pay is appropriate to the organisation, and the issues on which the approval of the sponsor (or equivalent) is required.
• Organisations independent of central government or who do not otherwise have an external sponsor must ensure a proper remuneration framework is in place. Because of the constitutional arrangements for the body, this may be specific to it. Equally, there may be scope for collaboration with similar organisations.
• Organisations must ensure that recruitment and renewal remuneration packages are considered and approved – within a clear scheme of authority levels – before they are advertised, offered or awarded.
• The independence and escalation principles below do not obviate the primary responsibility and accountability of the governing body for the organisation’s approach to top-level reward and for the existence and effective operation of suitable procedures.
65
1.2 Independence Individual top-level reward should, where possible, be determined by skilled people of seniority and standing who are independent of management and constitute a free-standing remuneration committee.
Guidance • No-one should be involved in deciding his or her own remuneration.
• Subject to the escalation principle below, the remuneration committee will determine pay policies and processes, starting salary, the performance pay regime and, where relevant, conditions for payment of bonuses and agreement to bonuses paid in practice.
• The remuneration committee should operate independently of the organisation’s management and should have access to administrative support and resources for independent research (including the ability to tender for and appoint consultants). The committee’s terms of reference must be publicly available.
• Where an organisation does not have independent representatives on its governing body, an alternative method of securing independent involvement should be identified in the organisation’s published remuneration policies
• The remuneration committee should be chaired by a designated senior independent representative, whose appointment should be approved by the sponsor or equivalent. Ideally, at least one member of the committee should have expertise in the field of remuneration. The Chair of the governing body may not sit on the committee if he or she has an executive function in the organisation.
• Appointments to the remuneration committee should normally be for three years in the first instance, with provision for one further three-year term subject to satisfactory performance. Suitable refresher training should be provided for committee members at regular intervals to ensure that their understanding is up to date.
• For smaller organisations, it may be more effective for a remuneration committee to operate across a number of organisations at an appropriate level of aggregation.
66
1.3 Escalation Escalation procedures must apply where an organisation exceptionally needs to offer remuneration outside the bounds of its defined pay framework.
Guidance • The organisation’s published remuneration policy should be clear on the
criteria justifying an exception, the levels or types of remuneration for which escalation is required, and the hierarchy of escalation (particularly the point at which reference to the sponsor or equivalent is required).
• Escalation will also be required for changes of substance in governance arrangements or in remuneration policies and procedures.
• The process for activating individual requests for an exceptional remuneration offer must be thoroughly documented by the remuneration committee. There must be a full reasoned statement of the rationale for any such offer.
• The associated processes should be transacted as quickly as possible when the need for escalation is identified, either before the start of a recruitment campaign, on finding a preferred candidate, or where the need for an exceptional in-service award is identified. The escalation processes should conclude as soon as possible, ideally within 10 days.
• Organisations independent of government or that do not otherwise have an external sponsor must put in place appropriate arrangements to recognise the exceptional character of decisions falling outside the applicable pay framework.
67
1.4 Contracts of employment There must be comprehensive contracts of employment that protect the interests of the individual and the organisation.
Guidance • Contracts of employment must unambiguously set out full details of the total
remuneration package and other terms. These must include the arrangements for making any uplift in the base salary or any material changes to other benefits during the lifetime of the contract.
• Contracts must take account of sound practice in specifying matters such as contract length, notice periods (not normally longer than six months), and arrangements for termination and any associated compensation.
• The remuneration committee should consider carefully any terms of settlement providing for compensation in the event of early termination (including cash compensation, pension contributions and other elements). Under certain circumstances, it may be more appropriate to pay any compensation in stages (either to a defined point or until the departing employee secures another source of income, whichever is shorter) rather than as a single lump sum.
• Rigorous performance management and appraisal systems must be in place to provide evidence for contract changes or extensions.
• The approval of the governing body is required for the principle and terms of any external role, paid or unpaid, carried out by a senior executive in working time. Considerations include the time required for the role and any potential for conflict of interest or detriment to the home organisation. For paid roles, the remuneration committee should determine the treatment of all fees or other income, with the presumption that these be remitted to the main employer unless there are exceptional reasons otherwise.
• The remuneration committee will monitor the organisation’s application of this principle, particularly making sure that contracts do not offer excessive or inappropriate reward structures or leave the organisation open to allegations that it is willing to reward failure.
• Where contracts of employment are not appropriate (for office holders, for example) the items covered in this section should be reflected to the extent possible in letters of appointment, statements of terms and conditions or similar instruments.
68
2 Appropriate remuneration 2.1 Value for money
Remuneration must demonstrably provide value for money in the use of public resources and be no more than is necessary to attract, retain and motivate able staff, on a sustainable basis, to deliver public functions.
Guidance • Public sector organisations should seek to recruit and retain the best person
for the job, but they should also refuse to meet excessive demands, particularly at appointment or reappointment.
• Pay on appointment or reappointment must be decided following a rigorous assessment of the relevant market and the amount it is necessary and appropriate to pay for suitable staff. Pay benchmarks should normally be drawn from the wider public sector rather than the private sector (and based on a suitably broad range of public sector bodies). The level of pay offered should also take account of the other benefits offered. The remuneration package must additionally reflect affordability.
• The appropriate level of remuneration for a post must be considered afresh at each appointment: the salary of a previous incumbent is not an automatic benchmark as individual circumstances will be different and recruitment markets evolve. Similarly, there must be no assumption that remuneration for a candidate needs to be at the same level as in his or her previous role – some posts are inherently attractive and people may be willing to accept a lower salary.
• The remuneration committee must have regard to pay and employment conditions elsewhere in the department, organisation or the wider public sector, particularly when determining annual salary increases.
• Remuneration can decrease under the right contractual circumstances, such as where an exceptional temporary contract is made permanent or an exceptional role returns to normal.
• Public sector organisations should normally regard internal or sectoral talent as the primary source of their future leadership cadre. External recruitment will be an appropriate solution in the right circumstances, but this does not obviate the need to ensure appropriate succession planning and talent management policies are in place for key roles.
69
2.2 Total reward In determining top-level reward, organisations must consider separately the elements of a total reward package – base pay, incentives, pension contributions and any other material benefits. The composition of the reward package must be appropriate to the role and circumstances of the organisation.
Guidance • The elements of the total reward package must be identified separately in
contracts and in all reporting on individual remuneration. The costs to the employer of the separate elements of the reward package, particularly pension contributions, need to be evaluated in a meticulous and consistent manner.
70
2.3 Payment for performance Performance should normally be the basis of any progression or uplift in base pay. Other elements of performance-related or contingent pay may be used if appropriate to the organisation’s public service mission and helpful in motivating and retaining senior staff.
Guidance • A formal system of (at least) annual appraisal must be in place for all staff
covered by this Code. The outcome of this evaluation must be reported to the remuneration committee and form the basis of any recommendation on remuneration for the executives in question.
• Awards should be demonstrably merited and never made in cases of poor performance.
• All progression and any uplift in base pay must be dependent on a positive recommendation based on performance, even where incremental payscales apply.
• Variable components of remuneration should only be used where they can be linked to predetermined, objective and measurable performance criteria, which may include criteria of a non-financial nature. The less precise the terms in which success can be defined, generally the smaller an element this type of pay should be of the overall remuneration package.
• In its policies, the organisation must set defined limits on the variable components of remuneration. There may be circumstances in which it is appropriate to defer significant variable components of remuneration for a number of years to ensure that success is sustainably implemented.
• For some positions, particularly those related to the delivery of a large long-term project, it may be more appropriate for performance-related payments to be made on the basis of performance across the contract as a whole or in relation to specified milestones, not on an annual basis.
• Contractually guaranteed bonuses are rarely appropriate in the public sector. Exceptions will require the approval of the sponsor or equivalent.
• Payments actually made and the justification for them must be included in the annual remuneration report prescribed in section 3.1.
71
72
3 Disclosure 3.1 Disclosure of procedures
Organisations must demonstrate that their remuneration processes apply the spirit of this Code and its specific provisions as far as possible on a ‘comply or explain’ basis. Their policies, frameworks and governance arrangements for top-level reward should therefore be clearly described and publicly available.
Guidance • Some provisions of this Code may not be fully applicable to some
organisations. It may also be that the spirit of the Code could be more effectively observed through an alternative procedure to the one prescribed here. In such cases of non-compliance, the governing body must explain and justify the alternative procedure and agree it with its sponsor or equivalent.
• The remuneration committee must produce a clear and easily understandable annual remuneration report for publication by the governing body, covering the matters specified in the Code, and particularly in this section and section 3.2.
• Any changes made to relevant policies, frameworks or governance arrangements and any deviation from them in particular cases during the year must be specifically described and justified in the committee’s annual remuneration report.
• It is acceptable for the current version of any relevant policies, frameworks and governance arrangements to be made available through the organisation’s website, provided a clear reference and link is included in the remuneration committee’s annual report.
73
3.2 Disclosure of remuneration Organisations must disclose annually the total remuneration of individual staff members covered by this Code, the basis of decisions on that remuneration, any exceptions made to established policies and frameworks and any significant changes to those policies and frameworks.
Guidance • The annual remuneration report prescribed in section 3.1 should also cover the
matters required by this section.
• The report must disclose the cash value of each element of the remuneration of each senior executive, identifying them by name and job title.
• Outside the senior executive team, those earning more than £100,000 a year do not need to be identified by name, but the numbers of such staff and the cash value of their total reward should be disclosed in bands of five thousand pounds.
• The remuneration report must also comment on any appointments, re-appointments or changes to individual terms and conditions where there has been a departure from the defined remuneration framework for the organisation or from the provisions of this Code, together with a statement of the reasons for the departure.
• In cases of early termination of a contract, the process followed and any compensation awarded must be subject to full disclosure.
• The committee should also be prepared to provide ad hoc reports on the appointment of a new senior executive or any other significant event that involves changes to a senior remuneration package.
74
3.3 Audit Audit procedures must be established and documented that are independent of the remuneration process. A report on compliance with this Code must be included in the organisation’s annual audit report.
Guidance • The remuneration committee will apply the necessary internal controls to
allow it to comply with any audit enquiry.
• The governing body will monitor and review the effectiveness of the organisation’s internal audit function in relation to remuneration matters.
• The terms of reference of the audit procedures should be made publicly available in accordance with section 3.1 above.
75
76
Annex D List of Northern Ireland civil service departments
Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure
Department of Education
Department for Employment and Learning
Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment
Department of the Environment
Department of Finance and Personnel
Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety
Department for Regional Development
Department for Social Development
Department of Justice
77
78
Annex E Median salaries of members of the Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service and wider public sector comparators 2008-0936,37
The following charts compare the pay of each of the NI SCS pay bands with
that of broadly comparable senior posts in the wider public sector in Northern
Ireland.
Median basic salaries for pay band 3 and wider public sector comparators (full-time equivalents)
£0
£20,000
£40,000
£60,000
£80,000
£100,000
£120,000
£140,000
Strategic InvestmentBoard SeniorExecutives
Education & LibraryBoards ChiefExecutives
Health & SocialServices Chief
Executives
Wider public sector roles
Pay band 3
Source: Strategic Policy Division of the Department of Finance and Personnel Note: In terms of full-time equivalents, there are three comparable Strategic Investment Board Senior Executives, five Education and Library Board Chief Executives and ten Health and Social Services Chief Executives.
36 Pay data for Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service, Invest Northern Ireland and Health and Social Services senior officials relates to 2009-10. 37 Bonus payments are excluded.
79
Median basic salaries for pay band 2 and wider public sector comparators (full-time equivalents)
£0
£10,000
£20,000
£30,000
£40,000
£50,000
£60,000
£70,000
£80,000
£90,000
£100,000
Invest Northern IrelandManaging Directors
Northern IrelandHousing Executive
Directors
Health & SocialServices Directors
Wider public sector roles
Pay band 2
Source: Strategic Policy Division of the Department of Finance and Personnel Notes: 1. In terms of full-time equivalents, there are four Invest Northern Ireland Managing Directors, six Northern Ireland Housing Executive Directors and 59 Health and Social Services Directors. 2. The salary for Northern Ireland Housing Executive Directors is the mean as the median was not available.
80
Median basic salaries for pay band 1 and wider public sector comparators (full-time equivalents)
£0
£10,000
£20,000
£30,000
£40,000
£50,000
£60,000
£70,000
£80,000
£90,000
ComparableNon-
DepartmentalPublic Bodies
roles
Invest NorthernIreland
Directors
StrategicInvestment
Board Advisers
NorthernIreland Housing
ExecutiveAssistantDirectors
Education &Library Boards
2nd TierOfficers
Wider public sector roles
Pay band 1
Source: Strategic Policy Division of the Department of Finance and Personnel Notes: 1. In terms of full-time equivalents, there are 10 comparable Non-Departmental Public Bodies roles, 14 Invest Northern Ireland Directors, 11½ Strategic Investment Board Advisers, 29 Northern Ireland Housing Executive Assistant Directors and 27 Education and Library Boards 2nd Tier Officers. 2. The salary for comparable Non-Department Public Bodies roles is the mean as the median was not available.
81
82
Annex F Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service pay bands as at 31 March 2009 Northern Ireland Pay Band Minimum Maximum
1 £57,300 £116,0002 £81,600 £160,0003 £98,059 £205,000
Source: Northern Ireland Civil Service
83
84
Annex G Glossary of abbreviations DFPNI Department of Finance and Personnel – Northern
Ireland GB SCS Great Britain Senior Civil Service HPTR Higher Performance Target Rate ILO International Labour Organization NHS National Health Service NICS Northern Ireland Civil Service NI CSC Northern Ireland Civil Service Commissioners NIO Northern Ireland Office NI SCS Northern Ireland Senior Civil Service OME Office of Manpower Economics ONS Office for National Statistics PTR Progression Target Rate RPC Recruitment and Performance Ceiling SCS Senior Civil Service SSRB Senior Salaries Review Body
85