review & comparison

19
Review & Comparison Non-Renewable & Renewable Energy Resources

Upload: thuy

Post on 10-Feb-2016

21 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Review & Comparison. Non-Renewable & Renewable Energy Resources. Comparison of Transportation . Nuclear Power Plant. Charcoal. Solar Ovens. Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 33 U.S.C. 2702 to 2761 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Review & Comparison

Review & Comparison

Non-Renewable & RenewableEnergy

Resources

Page 2: Review & Comparison
Page 3: Review & Comparison
Page 4: Review & Comparison

Comparison of Transportation

Page 5: Review & Comparison
Page 6: Review & Comparison
Page 7: Review & Comparison
Page 8: Review & Comparison
Page 9: Review & Comparison

Nuclear Power Plant

Page 10: Review & Comparison
Page 11: Review & Comparison

Charcoal

Page 12: Review & Comparison

Solar Ovens

Page 13: Review & Comparison
Page 14: Review & Comparison

Oil Pollution Act of 1990

• Oil Pollution Act of 1990• 33 U.S.C. 2702 to 2761• The Oil Pollution Act (OPA) of 1990 streamlined and strengthened

EPA’s ability to prevent and respond to catastrophic oil spills. A trust fund financed by a tax on oil is available to clean up spills when the responsible party is incapable or unwilling to do so. The OPA requires oil storage facilities and vessels to submit to the Federal government plans detailing how they will respond to large discharges. EPA has published regulations for aboveground storage facilities; the Coast Guard has done so for oil tankers. The OPA also requires the development of Area Contingency Plans to prepare and plan for oil spill response on a regional scale.

Page 15: Review & Comparison

Energy & Efficiency

• 16- 20% commercial E performs useful work• 40% unavoidable waste (2nd Law of Thermo)• 40% Unnecessary waste

Page 16: Review & Comparison

Commercial Unnecessary waste

• Incandescent light bulb (5% light + 95% lost as heat)• Motor vehicles (heat, unnecessary idling)

• Nuclear power plant (83-92 % wasted)

• Coal fired E plants loose heat

• NOW what about PASSIVE Solar heating?– 90% through window + 10% reflected

Page 17: Review & Comparison

YoUsing Energy More Efficiently

Decrease Use (reduce) & conserve

Individual Homes• Increase insulation• Decrease leaks• Fans• LightingMotor vehicle use• Plan routes• Vehicle maintenance

Page 18: Review & Comparison

IndUStrial USe

• Cogeneration – using excess heat or gas for other industrial uses near-by

• Replacing inefficient motors• Recycling materials there decreasing use of

raw ores• Not using incandescent lights

Page 19: Review & Comparison

More IndUStrial USe

CAFÉ –Corporate Average Fuel Economy • 1973 – 1985 US Govt imposed standards• To increase fuel efficiency in new vehicles• Has since declined d/t no increased standards

until 2008• Govt can increase taxes on gasoline