review of the economic system planning criteria
DESCRIPTION
Review of the Economic System Planning Criteria. June 15 th , 2012 / RPG. Background. Project #39537 Rulemaking to Implement HB 971, Relating to Economic Criteria for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for an Electric Transmission Project. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Review of the Economic System Planning Criteria
June 15th, 2012 / RPG
2
Background
ERCOT Public
“The criteria must include a comparison of the estimated cost of the transmission project and the estimated cost savings that may result from the transmission project.”
Project #39537Rulemaking to Implement HB 971, Relating to Economic Criteria for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for an Electric Transmission Project
To determine the societal benefit of a proposed project, the revenue requirement of the capital cost of the project is compared to the expected savings in system production costs resulting from the project over the expected life of the project.
3.11.2, Planning Criteria
3
Net Societal Benefit
Societal Impact Test – the increase in the societal surplus (equal to the reduction in production costs) due to a project must exceed the annual carrying cost of a proposed project.
ERCOT Public
P
S
D
Q
CS
PS
Societal Surplus S’
4
1/6: The magic number
In 2006, ERCOT stakeholders analyzed the components typically included in regulated rate-based transmission assets for various ERCOT TDSP’s. We learned that:
– Different TDSP’s incur different expenses (taxes, financing costs, etc.) based on location, capital structure, or organization type.
– An average, or most likely range of expenses would be most practical for use in estimating the annual rate-based revenue requirements for a capital transmission project.
ERCOT Public
5
Pro-forma Transmission Revenue Requirement Calculation
ERCOT collected estimates and/or actual figures for select transmission providers:
ERCOT Public
Debt (% of total capital)
Debt Rate
Equity Rate
FIT Rate
IDC
Franchise Tax
Gross Receipts Tax
Inflation Rate
Property Tax Rate
To create a pro-forma spreadsheet to calculate a first year revenue requirement for a regulated transmission project.
6
Pro-forma 1st year revenue requirement
ERCOT Public
Project Financials (Revenue Requirements)
(Thousands)
-1 0 1 2 3
Return on Rate Base 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Equity 0 1,297 1,264 1,232
Debt 0 1,203 1,173 1,143
Total 0 2,500 2,437 2,375
Depreciation 0 791 791 791
Fixed O&M 0 0 0 0
Var O&M 0 624 637 649
Property Taxes 0 791 791 791
FIT plus 0 8 -105 -18
Gross Receipt Tax 0 8 8 8
Total Revenue Requirement 0 4,713 4,550 4,587
For a hypothetical $30,000 transmission investment, given average assumptions, approximately $4,700 would be added to the rate base in year 1.
7
Demonstrating Economy
ERCOT Public
Hypothetical Project Cost: $30,000
Pro-forma estimate of 1st year revenue requirement: $4,713
To demonstrate economic merit, the marginal cost of the upgrade, on an annual basis, should be roughly commensurate with its marginal benefit.
If a project returns at least its 1st year revenue requirement in production cost savings in year one of its inclusion in rates, ~ MC=MB
8
Input Assumptions – do they change?
• Tax rates – generally flat• Capital structure – possibly dynamic• Cost of capital - dynamic• Taxable Status – varies by organizational structure
ERCOT Public
ERCOT selected entities from public / investor owned transmission providers to determine if the 1/6 was still a relevant threshold for economy.
9
Data sources:
• Public / conveniently available data of the inputs below varied by organization
• Different organizations have different reporting requirements
ERCOT Public
Debt (% of total capital)
Debt Rate
Equity Rate
FIT Rate
IDC
Franchise Tax
Gross Receipts Tax
Inflation Rate
Property Tax Rate
10
Alternate Approach
Utilize transmission service revenue requirement data from Schedule A (most recent)
Rev Requirement – O&M
Rate Base
ERCOT Public
Revenue Requirement %=
11
Preliminary Results
• Comparing the results of both approaches to determine the economic threshold yielded similar or identical results.
• The review, thus far, has determined that the 1/6th criteria is still reasonable and relevant.
• ERCOT shall establish a procedure to periodically verify and/or update the economic threshold.
ERCOT Public