review - semantic scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf ·...

11
Author Proof 1 10.2217/FCA.13.59 © 2013 Future Medicine Ltd ISSN 1479-6678 Future Cardiol. (2013) 9(5), 1–xxx Future Cardiology part of Hypotension is a commonly encountered prob- lem in the field of neonatology. At least half of extremely low-birth weight babies will have at least one hypotensive episode throughout their early life [1] . The figure varies according to ges- tational age, degree of growth restriction and postnatal age. Lower and upper limits of ges- tational age-adjusted physiological blood pres- sure values for both term and preterm infants have not been determined [2,3] . In term neo- nates, hypotension is commonly considered to be a mean blood pressure that is lower than the tenth percentile for age [4,5] . Similar definitions have been extrapolated to the preterm popula- tion using data gathered from a cohort of healthy preterm babies. The critical condition of most extremely preterm babies in the first week of life makes identification of a healthy population on which to base normal values difficult. A com- monly used rule of thumb defines hypotension in preterm neonates as a mean blood pressure of a lower value than the gestational age of the baby. This definition has not been appropriately validated and may lead to overtreatment, which has been associated with an adverse outcome (FIGURE 1) [6] . Blood pressure monitoring is an established parameter in the field of neonatology, frequently being assumed to be a proxy measurement for the degree of organ perfusion and therefore as a marker for shock and circulatory compromise. Systemic hypotension in preterm neonates is known to be associated with organ damage resulting from organ hypoperfusion. A strong link with adverse neurological outcomes follow- ing hypotensive episodes has long been demon- strated [7,8] . The duration as well as severity of hypotension has also been shown to correlate with the degree of neurological impairment at 2 years of age in extremely low-birth weight infants [8,9] . Accurate measurement of systemic blood pres- sure (SBP) in sick neonates can prove challeng- ing. The accuracy of noninvasive oscillometric techniques in comparison with invasive tech- niques is still under debate. Studies carried out in the 1980s and 1990s claim that noninvasive oscillometric techniques tend to overestimate SBP, especially at the lower reaches, and there- fore tend to underestimate hypotension [10] . More recent studies claim that there is good cor- relation between the two techniques [11] . This may be a reflection of improvements in technol- ogy that have taken place in the interim years. Both techniques require rigorous methodology in order to yield accurate results. Appropriately sized cuffs are required for noninvasive blood pressure monitoring. Blood pressure transduc- ers used for invasive monitoring need to be cali- brated frequently and need to be kept at the level of the heart. Dampening of transduced wave- forms leads to inaccurate measurements and is a frequently encountered problem [12] . Systemic arterial blood pressure itself has been shown to be poorly correlated with systemic blood flow in preterm neonates [13] . Systemic hypotension is therefore not a reliable marker of systemic hypoperfusion in preterm neo- nates. Surprisingly, no internationally accepted consensus exists on the definition of shock in newborns [14] . Several treatment strategies have been used to provide cardiovascular support to hypoten- sive newborns; these include volume expansion, inotropes and corticosteroids. All have been extensively studied with mixed results. All have The diagnosis and management of hypotension in neonates Ryan Farrugia* 1 , Hector Rojas 2 & Heike Rabe 2 1 Neonatal & Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta 2 Academic Department of Paediatrics, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Royal Alexandra Children’s Hospital, Brighton, BN2 5BE, UK *Author for correspondence: [email protected] The diagnosis and management of hypotension in neonates is a frequently encountered issue in the intensive care setting. There is an ongoing debate as to the appropriateness of blood pressure monitoring as an indicator of organ perfusion and tissue hypoxia. These ultimately determine morbidity and mortality in the sick newborn. This article explores the methods available for the assessment of organ perfusion and speculates on other means that may become available in the future. Different modalities of treatment currently in use are discussed, with the aim of using information gained from perfusion monitoring techniques to determine the optimal choice of therapy. Keywords n fluid therapy n hypotension n newborn n perfusion n shock n steroids n vasopressor agents Review

Upload: vandan

Post on 19-Jun-2019

242 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

110.2217/FCA.13.59 © 2013 Future Medicine Ltd ISSN 1479-6678Future Cardiol. (2013) 9(5), 1–xxx

Futu

re C

ard

iolo

gy

part of

Hypotension is a commonly encountered prob-lem in the field of neonatology. At least half of extremely low-birth weight babies will have at least one hypotensive episode throughout their early life [1]. The figure varies according to ges-tational age, degree of growth restriction and postnatal age. Lower and upper limits of ges-tational age-adjusted physiological blood pres-sure values for both term and preterm infants have not been determined [2,3]. In term neo-nates, hypotension is commonly considered to be a mean blood pressure that is lower than the tenth percentile for age [4,5]. Similar definitions have been extrapolated to the preterm popula-tion using data gathered from a cohort of healthy preterm babies. The critical condition of most extremely preterm babies in the first week of life makes identification of a healthy population on which to base normal values difficult. A com-monly used rule of thumb defines hypotension in preterm neonates as a mean blood pressure of a lower value than the gestational age of the baby. This definition has not been appropriately validated and may lead to overtreatment, which has been associated with an adverse outcome (Figure 1) [6] .

Blood pressure monitoring is an established parameter in the field of neonatology, frequently being assumed to be a proxy measurement for the degree of organ perfusion and therefore as a marker for shock and circulatory compromise. Systemic hypotension in preterm neonates is known to be associated with organ damage resulting from organ hypoperfusion. A strong link with adverse neurological outcomes follow-ing hypotensive episodes has long been demon-strated [7,8]. The duration as well as severity of hypotension has also been shown to correlate

with the degree of neurological impairment at 2 years of age in extremely low-birth weight infants [8,9].

Accurate measurement of systemic blood pres-sure (SBP) in sick neonates can prove challeng-ing. The accuracy of noninvasive oscillometric techniques in comparison with invasive tech-niques is still under debate. Studies carried out in the 1980s and 1990s claim that noninvasive oscillometric techniques tend to overestimate SBP, especially at the lower reaches, and there-fore tend to underestimate hypotension [10]. More recent studies claim that there is good cor-relation between the two techniques [11]. This may be a reflection of improvements in technol-ogy that have taken place in the interim years. Both techniques require rigorous methodology in order to yield accurate results. Appropriately sized cuffs are required for noninvasive blood pressure monitoring. Blood pressure transduc-ers used for invasive monitoring need to be cali-brated frequently and need to be kept at the level of the heart. Dampening of transduced wave-forms leads to inaccurate measurements and is a frequently encountered problem [12].

Systemic arterial blood pressure itself has been shown to be poorly correlated with systemic blood flow in preterm neonates [13]. Systemic hypotension is therefore not a reliable marker of systemic hypoperfusion in preterm neo-nates. Surprisingly, no internationally accepted consensus exists on the definition of shock in newborns [14].

Several treatment strategies have been used to provide cardiovascular support to hypoten-sive newborns; these include volume expansion, inotropes and corticosteroids. All have been extensively studied with mixed results. All have

The diagnosis and management of hypotension in neonates

Ryan Farrugia*1, Hector Rojas2 & Heike Rabe2

1Neonatal & Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta 2Academic Department of Paediatrics, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Royal Alexandra Children’s Hospital, Brighton, BN2 5BE, UK *Author for correspondence: [email protected]

The diagnosis and management of hypotension in neonates is a frequently encountered issue in the intensive care setting. There is an ongoing debate as to the appropriateness of blood pressure monitoring as an indicator of organ perfusion and tissue hypoxia. These ultimately determine morbidity and mortality in the sick newborn. This article explores the methods available for the assessment of organ perfusion and speculates on other means that may become available in the future. Different modalities of treatment currently in use are discussed, with the aim of using information gained from perfusion monitoring techniques to determine the optimal choice of therapy.

Keywords

n fluid therapy n hypotension n newborn n perfusion n shock n steroids n vasopressor agents

Revie

w

Page 2: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

Future Cardiol. (2013) 9(5)2 future science group

been shown to raise blood pressures and all carry potential risks of adverse effects. It would there-fore be logical to advocate a rational use of anti-hypotensive interventions and to give preference to treatment strategies that best target the etiol-ogy of the hypotension. Such a decision would require two prerequisites: a consensus as to what constitutes an abnormally low blood pressure and/or circulatory failure requiring treatment and the availability of alternate markers that may point towards the etiology of circulatory failure, thereby facilitating the selection of an appropriate treatment strategy. Indeed, one could argue that a critical appraisal is warranted as to whether blood pressure monitoring is the most appropriate strategy for the early detection of shock in sick newborns.

Neonatal physiology & the etiology of circulatory failure

SBP is the product of cardiac output and sys-temic vascular resistance. Cardiac output, in turn, is dependent on heart rate, preload, after-load and myocardial contractility. Any of these factors can act independently or in combination to result in a reduction in SBP.

The neonatal circulatory system differs from the adult in that it is undergoing a state of adap-tation from extrauterine life. Duct-dependent congenital heart disease needs to be excluded in all newborns with persistent hypotension. Rapid

infusion of fluids in a neonate with a patent duc-tus arteriosus may cause left-to-right shunting and congestive heart failure, induced by volume overload.

A significant number of hypotensive newborns have been reported to have a normal or high cardiac output. It therefore follows that in a sig-nificant number of cases, hypotension may be the result of reduced vascular resistance, second-ary to abnormal vasomotor tone or to significant shunting [15,16].

A significant proportion of hypotensive new-borns will be receiving invasive ventilation due to respiratory distress. This, together with the degree of prematurity, increases the risks of ten-sion pneumothorax and pneumopericardium, which could impair venous return and cardiac contractility, and which should be actively excluded.

A practical approach to the assessment of organ perfusion

The ultimate aim for the neonatologist treating a sick neonate is survival without morbidity, with a special emphasis on neuroprotection. Published evidence enforces the belief of the need for an adequate perfusion of vital tissues. Perfusion of vital organs is dependent on SBP, but measured SBP may itself be a poor marker of organ perfu-sion, particularly in the first 48 h of life.

Traditional methods of assessing tissue and organ perfusion have depended on indirect and subjective assessments of tissue function.

Skin & superficial tissue perfusionIn low cardiac output states, blood supply to the skin is diverted to vital organs. Skin perfusion can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature gap. Both of these assessments are affected by the thermal environment [17]. Capillary refill time (CRT) needs to be measured centrally and cor-relates poorly with hypovolemia in children [18]. In preterm and very low-birth weight babies in the first days of life, vasomotor tone is not yet well established. In these patients, skin perfu-sion assessment is an unreliable marker of tissue perfusion [19].

White light spectroscopic techniques are in development for the noninvasive measurement of tissue hemoglobin in newborns [20]. These techniques work on the principle that oxyhe-moglobin and deoxyhemoglobin absorb light at specific wavelengths. Scatter of nonabsorbed light gives tissues a specific wavelength profile, which can be measured at the skin surface.

37–43 weeks

33–36 weeks

27–32 weeks

23–26 weeks

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

0 12 24 36 48 60 72

Age (h)

Mea

n b

loo

d p

ress

ure

(m

mH

g)

Figure 1. Currently suggested lower and upper limits for normal blood pressure in neonates [2].

Review Farrugia, Rojas & Rabe

Page 3: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

www.futuremedicine.com 3future science group

Orthogonal polarization spectral imaging utilizes linearly polarized light with a specific wavelength for hemoglobin and allows visualiza-tion of small blood vessels in the extremities [21].

Laser Doppler flowmetry is being researched as a noninvasive technique to quantify blood flow in human tissues such as skin and could like-wise hold promise in assessing tissue perfusion in neonates (Box 1) [22].

Cerebral perfusionThe measurement of cerebral perfusion is a much sought-after parameter in the ambit of neuro-protection, especially since it has been shown that cerebral perfusion is independent of mean arterial blood pressure in preterm newborns [23].

Near infrared spectroscopy has been a prom-ising development in this field. Near infrared spectroscopy takes advantage of the high degree of transparency of brain tissue to light in the near infrared spectrum and allows real-time noninvasive measurement of regional oxygen saturation and hemoglobin concentration, both through the skin and the intact skull. Its use in preterm and term neonates has been validated [24,25], but the technique is not yet in routine use. The SafeBoosC study group is currently evaluating this method further [101].

EchocardiographyThe use of echocardiography as a tool for bed-side hemodynamic measurements in the neo-natal intensive care unit is gaining impetus. Echocardiography is being increasingly consid-ered an integral component of the assessment of the critically ill newborn [26,27]. The increasing availability of ultrasound equipment in neonatal units has rendered these assessments logistically feasible.

Transthoracic echocardiography on critically ill neonates allows the exclusion of structural congenital heart disease, which is frequently the unexpected cause of hemodynamic instability.

Assessment of cardiac contractility by mea-surement of shortening fractions and left ven-tricular stroke distance may be helpful in the choice of inotropic support. Left ventricular output has the limitation of being an unreliable indicator of perfusion in the presence of a patent ductus arteriosus or intracardiac shunts, a com-mon scenario in newborns with a transitional circulation.

Measurement of inferior vena cava diameter allows the operator to gain an indication of pre-load and therefore the adequacy of vascular fill-ing. Inferior vena cava diameter may, however,

be increased in cardiac failure states and in children ventilated with high pressures.

Echographic measurement of the flow through the superior vena cava (SVC) reflects venous return from the brain and upper body, which is not biased by ductal or intracardiac shunts. It gives a better reflection of cerebral blood flow than cerebral artery Doppler measures [28]. A correlation has been demonstrated between poor upper body blood flow in the first day of life and an increase in mortality, risk of necrotis-ing enterocolitis (NEC), peri-/intra-ventricular hemorrhage (P/IVH) and adverse neurodevel-opmental outcomes in infants born at less than 30 weeks gestation [29,30].

Common carotid flow has been validated in a population of term and preterm infants, but has not been sufficiently studied in extremely low-birth weight infants [31]. The common carotids account for the majority of cerebral blood flow and therefore allow for an accurate assessment of cerebral perfusion.

The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) supplies the gut from the duodenum to the transverse colon. Poor SMA flow may play a key role in the etiology of NEC. Measurements and clini-cal correlations of SMA flow are still awaiting validation and may, in the near future, offer an insight into the relationship between intes-tinal perfusion and pathologies, such as feed intolerance and NEC [32,33].

LactateLactic acid accumulates as a result of anaerobic metabolism resulting from decreased tissue per-fusion, sepsis or inborn errors of metabolism. A strong linear correlation has been demonstrated between arterial and capillary lactate levels [34]. Capillary measurements are therefore frequently used in newborns in whom arterial samples may

Box 1. Currently used noninvasive methods for the assessment of circulation.

�n Clinical examination: capillary refill time, pulses, skin color, blood pressure and urine output

�n Echocardiography and Doppler: enables measurement of cardiac output and superior vena cava flow, but requires considerable expertise, and does not provide real-time data

�n Near infrared spectroscopy: real-time noninvasive measurement of regional perfusion and oxygenation

�n Laser Doppler: quantification of blood flow in capillaries�n White light spectroscopy: measurement of hemoglobin in superficial tissues using

absorption and scatter algorithms, providing real-time data on perfusion�n Orthogonal polarization spectral imaging: visualization of small peripheral blood

vessels using polarized light�n Pulse oximetry: real-time oxygenation and perfusion

The diagnosis & management of hypotension in neonates Review

Page 4: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

Future Cardiol. (2013) 9(5)4 future science group

be difficult to obtain. Serial measurements can provide useful indicators of tissue hypoxia with values of more than 3 mmol/l at birth being abnormal [35]. Combining serum lactate levels with CRT improves positive and negative pre-dictive values. A serum lactate level >4mmol/l and CRT >4 s correlates with a 97% probability of detecting a low SVC flow (Box 2) [36].

Renal perfusionUrine output is measured as a surrogate for renal perfusion. Changes in urine output, especially in the uncatheterized newborn, are a late and relatively insensitive marker of tissue perfusion, and only occur once a drop in blood pressure has occurred [37].

Treatment strategiesVolume expansionA meta-ana lysis published as part of a Cochrane review in 2009 by Osborn and Evans cited five trials that compared volume therapy versus no treatment in very preterm infants and found that mortality was similar for infants who received volume compared with those who received no treatment [38]. Two of these studies also exam-ined neurological outcomes in terms of P/IVH [39,40]. A meta-ana lysis of these two studies showed no significant difference in P/IVH. The Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative Trial Group (NNNI) published in 1996 also reported on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes and found no significant differences in severe disabil-ity and death between these two cohorts.

The meta-ana lysis concluded that there was no evidence to support routine early volume expansion in very preterm or extremely low-birth weight infants. The review found insufficient evidence to support the use of volume expansion in infants with cardiovascular compromise [41].

The choice of fluid used in volume resuscita-tion has been the subject of persisting debate in neonatology. Neonatal life support guidelines advocate considering 0.9% saline boluses to neonates that do not respond to resuscitation

at birth [102]. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation 2010 guidelines recommend the use of volume expansion with red blood cells or crystalloid solutions only in scenarios where there is proven loss of blood, but recog-nize that blood loss in neonates may frequently be occult [42].

So et al. in 1997 [43] and Lynch et al. in 2008 [44] have compared outcomes for using 10 ml/kg boluses of 0.9% saline as opposed to 5% albumin as fluid boluses in hypotensive infants. A meta-ana lysis of results showed no significant difference in mortality or P/IVH grades 3–4. However, Lynch reported a sig-nificant reduction in treatment failure for those infants receiving albumin, a finding that was not supported by So. Lynch also reported a more dramatic response in mean blood pressure to albumin boluses [43,44].

The Cochrane review by Osborn also carried out a meta-ana lysis of four studies comparing infants treated with fresh frozen plasma with those who received no volume expansion [38]. Three studies included mortality data and estab-lished no difference in mortality between the two groups. A meta-ana lysis of two studies that included data on P/IVH established a nonsig-nificant decrease in incidence [38,39]. The NNNI 1996 study reported no significant difference in rates of treatment failure, P/IVH, PVL, severe disability or mortality. This study, however, found a significant reduction in the incidence of NEC and an increase in the incidence of sepsis in the treated group [41].

NNNI 1996 compared 519 infants who received gelatine-based plasma substitutes with those who received no treatment and found no significant differences in treatment failure or incidence of P/IVH, PVL, long-term neu-rodisability or survival. The same study also compared infants treated with gelatine-based plasma substitutes with infants receiving fresh frozen plasma and established no clear ben-efit in survival rates and long-term neurologi-cal outcome. This study, however, showed a

Box 2. Biomarkers for assessment of circulatory status.

�n Serum lactate: strong correlation between rising lactate and falling superior vena cava flow especially when combined with other observations, such as capillary refill time

�n IL-8: early-phase marker for sepsis, with high sensitivity and specificity for likelihood of survival when used in septic shock

�n Fetal blood IL-6, urinary b2-microglobulin: described as indicators of fetal inflammatory response in preterms of less than 30 weeks gestation

�n Serum cortisol: positive correlation between rising cortisol levels and scores for predicting sepsis

Data taken from [64,69–72].

Review Farrugia, Rojas & Rabe

Page 5: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

www.futuremedicine.com 5future science group

significantly increased risk of NEC in infants receiving gelatine-based plasma substitutes and an increased risk of sepsis in those receiving fresh frozen plasma.

No studies comparing outcomes in neonates treated with packed red blood cell transfusions with those receiving no treatment have been found.

Volume therapy in the prevention of hypotension

Significant interest has been expressed in the uti-lization of blood contained within the placental circulation to augment neonatal blood volume. Up to two-thirds of a newborn’s circulating blood volume may reside within the placental circulation at birth.

Upon delivery of a baby, blood continues to flow through the placental circulation for a short period of time, resulting in a transfer of blood from the placental circulation to the neonate. Such transfer, also referred to as placental trans-fusion, may be affected by a number of practices in the active management of labor.

The traditional management of labor has been to clamp and then cut the umbilical cord upon delivery of the child and prior to delivery of the placenta. This practice has been aimed at reduc-ing the risks of blood loss from both mother and newborn and, at the same time, allowing for access to the neonate, should resuscitation be required.

The effect of delays in cord clamping and other practices to enhance placental transfu-sion on preterm infants outcomes has been the subject of two Cochrane reviews [45,46].

A delay in clamping of the umbilical cord has been the most commonly adopted strategy. There is, however, no consensus as to what con-stitutes a significant delay. Definitions in pub-lished literature range from 30–90 s following delivery of a preterm infant. The position of the neonate in relation to the uterus (and therefore the placenta) during the time period prior to cord clamping has also been studied.

Milking of the umbilical cord is another alter-native. The practice involves milking a section of umbilical cord approximately 20 cm long towards the umbilicus prior to clamping of the cord. This practice has been thought to hasten placental transfusion and may be more conve-nient in scenarios requiring immediate access to the newborn for resuscitation.

A meta-ana lysis of studies showed that neo-nates receiving improved placental transfusion through delayed cord clamping showed no

difference in mortality, but a lesser requirement for transfusions for anemia and hypotension. Data also suggest protection against P/IVH, NEC and sepsis. There was no difference in Apgar scores when compared with untreated groups, suggesting that resuscitation was not significantly hindered by these practices. A small randomized controlled trial showed decreased transfusion requirements, increased hemody-namic stability and a decreased incidence of chronic lung disease in very preterm babies having undergone milking of the umbilical cord [47,48].

Neonatal life support guidelines are now advocating a delay in cord clamping of at least 1 min [49].

Inotropes & vasopressorsInotropes are drugs that act on the myocardium to increase the force of cardiac contraction and, hence, the cardiac output. None of the inotro-pes presently in use have an exclusively inotropic effect. Most inotropes also affect heart rate and vascular tone. Their effect on the cardiovascu-lar system is therefore the net result of all of these influences. This usually translates to an increase in blood pressure, but not necessarily to an increase in end-organ perfusion.

Pulmonary vascular resistance is an important consideration in the neonatal population. This would be expected to fall dramatically at birth as the lungs inflate and oxygenate, but may fail to do so under certain conditions, resulting in per-sistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Systemic hypotension is commonly encountered in pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. The use of a vasoconstricting agent such as dopamine in such a circumstance may result in increased pulmonary vascular resistance, resulting in a reduction in cardiac output, an increase in right to left shunting or both [50].

Variations in the effects and metabolism of inotropes resulting from gestational age and organ dysfunction are not completely under-stood. It follows that there has been and still is significant debate as to which inotropes should be utilized and when in neonates. It is pertinent to note that evidence for the use of intropes is based almost exclusively on known pharma-cological action, rather than on assessment of meaningful clinical outcomes (TaBle 1) [51].

Resuscitation guidelines advocate considering the use of inotropes in cases of hypotension that persist, despite adequate volume resuscitation [37,42]. However, defining the adequacy of vol-ume resuscitation has proven to be challenging,

The diagnosis & management of hypotension in neonates Review

Page 6: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

Future Cardiol. (2013) 9(5)6 future science group

particularly in the neonatal population, in whom the presence of a transitional circulation may mimic hypovolemic states. In the majority of preterm infants, especially in the immedi-ate postnatal period, hypotension is caused by abnormal vasoregulation as opposed to hypo-volemia [14].

Dopamine is the time-honored first-line cat-echolamine inotrope. It acts on the myocar-dium to increase cardiac contractility and on the vascular smooth muscle, increasing periph-eral vascular resistance. It is thought to be more effective than dobutamine in restoring blood pressure as the latter drug acts mostly on the

Table 1. Inotropes and their effects on neonates.

Medicine Pharmacology Physiological effects† Dosage‡ Practical implications

Dopamine D1, D2, b1, b2 agonist

Increases contractility and vascular resistanceAt lower doses, dopamine is claimed to be a vasodilator (acting on dopaminergic and then b-receptors), but at higher doses, it has a greater effect on vasoconstriction

Neonates: 5–20µg/kg/minPICU starting dose: 3–5 µg/kg/minMay have an effect at 1 µg/kg/min in healthy children

Associated with vasoconstriction, so requires a long or central line

Dobutamine Predominant b1 agonist

Affects contractility without increasing vascular resistanceDobutamine has a greater action on b-receptors, producing vasodilation, tachycardia and chronotropy

Neonates: 5–20 µg/kg/minPICU starting dose: 3–5 µg/kg/minMaximum dose 20 µg/kg/min

Can be infused via peripheral line

Epinephrine a1, a2, b1, b2 agonist

Increases contractility (with increased vascular resistance at higher doses) Theoretically, epinephrine acts more on the b- than a-receptors and so should increase BP by increasing cadiac rate and contractility. Dopamine and dobutamine are less potent and have less peak effect than epinephrine or norepinephrine. All may produce tachycardia. Higher doses lead to receptor desensitization, but can be used sometimes

Neonates: 100–300 ng/kg/minOthers: 0.1 tirated up to 1.5 µg/kg

Associated with vasoconstriction, so requires a long or central line

Norepinephrine§ a1, a2, b1 agonist Norepinephrine has a proportionally greater action on the a-receptors and so increases BP by vasoconstriction

Neonates: 20–100 ng/kg/min initially, up to 1.0 µg/kg/min as base.Others: 20–100 ng/kg/min initially, up to 1.0 µg/kg/min as base.Higher doses lead to receptor desensitization

Associated with vasoconstriction, so requires a long or central line

Vasopressin ADH agonist in arterioles

May replace basal vasopressin levels in cases of severe hypotension

0.018–0.12 units/kg/hMay be used as rescue treatment

Hydrocortisone – – In neonates: 2.5 mg/kg 6-hourlyOthers: 1 mg/kg 6-hourly

Uncertainty about role as rescue or primary treatment

Milrinone PDE III inhibitor – 0.5–0.75 µg/kg/min –

Usual concentrations in use at Adler Hey PICU: epinephrine and norepinephrine: 0.1 µg/kg/min as a starting dose increased up to 1.5 µg/kg/min. 0.3 mg per kg body weight (i.e., 3 mg for a 10 kg child) made up to 50 ml and then run at 1 ml/h will give 0.1 µg/kg/min. Dopamine and dobutamine: 3–5 µg/kg/min increasing to 15–20 µg/kg/min. 15 mg/kg body weight made up to 50 ml and run at 1 ml/h will give 5 µg/kg/min. Vasopressin 1 unit/kg made up to 50 ml run at 1–3 ml/h will get 0.02–0.06 units/kg/h. †Not all these effects have been validated in neonates or some older age groups. ‡Short half-lives due to breakdown. §Norepinephrine doses are expressed here as a base. 1 mg norepinephrine acid tartrate = 500 µg base. ADH: Antidiuretic hormone; BP: Blood pressure; PDE III: Prostaglandin III; PICU: Pediatric intensive care unit. Reproduced with permission from [50].

Review Farrugia, Rojas & Rabe

Page 7: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

www.futuremedicine.com 7future science group

myocardium. Given its vasoconstrictive effects, dopamine requires central access for administra-tion, which may be time consuming, especially in critical scenarios. Dopamine is usually better tolerated than adrenaline and noradrenaline, as it causes less tachycardia. There is some evidence that dopamine affects renal arterial blood flow and low-dose dopamine of <5 µg/kg/min may actually cause vasodilatation of the renal arter-ies, improving urine output and serum creatinine levels. There are no data suggesting any effect on survival with the use of low-dose dopamine in neonates [3].

The optimal doses for dopamine and dobuta-mine in preterm neonates are not known. Phar-macokinetic studies have shown wide variations in plasma concentrations between preterms given the same dose. This probably reflects dif-ferences in metabolism and clearance, which is independent of weight and gestational age. There is a poor correlation between plasma concentra-tions of dopamine and dobutamine, and SBP response [52–55].

There are few studies on the effect of dopa-mine on neonates. A positive effect on left ven-tricular output has been demonstrated with doses of between 5 and 10 µg/kg/min in term and preterm infants [53,56,57]. Dopamine has been shown to have immunomodulatory effects in sick children and to reduce plasma levels of T4, TSH and prolactin [58]. Further study is needed on the significance of these findings.

A Cochrane review by Osborn published in 2009 compared the outcomes from two trials in neonates treated with dopamine, as opposed to volume expansion with albumin [59]. A meta-ana lysis of published evidence showed no dif-ference in mortality. Dopamine did produce a greater response in blood pressure and lower fail-ure rate (persistent hypotension) when compared with albumin [60,61].

Treatment with dopamine has been shown to have a significantly greater effect than dobuta-mine in increasing SBP, but there is no significant difference in SVC flow or right ventricular out-put between the two drugs. There is little change in blood pressure in the higher dose ranges of dobutamine (10–20 µg/kg/min); however, a significant rise in SVC flow has been noted as doses were increased to the upper reaches. No significant differences in long-term morbidity and overall mortality have been noted between the two drugs. Treatment failure has been shown to be substantial with either inotrope [30,62].

The use of adrenaline and noradrenaline is usually reserved for neonates with refractory

hypotension who have not responded to volume resuscitation. Both increase cardiac contractil-ity and heart rate. Both are potent vasoconstric-tors, but adrenaline may cause vasodilation at low doses.

Phosphodiesterase type 3 inhibitors such as milrinone disrupt the breakdown of cGMP and cAMP, which in turn modulate vasodila-tion. They possess positive inotropic effects, but their use in shock is limited by their vasodilatory effect, which in turn makes them suitable for use in infants with pulmonary hypertension or with a poor cardiac output following cardiac surgery.

The hormone vasopressin and its analog ter-lipressin are potent vasoconstrictors utilized in adult intensive care units for fluid and catechol-amine refractory hypotension and shock. Their use in neonatology is not well established. A recent Cochrane review concluded that there is a paucity of data with regard to the safety and efficacy of the use of vasopressin, and its analogs in refractory neonatal hypotension [63].

SteroidsCritical illness in newborn babies may result in the downregulation of adrenergic receptors, leading to a desensitization of the cardiovascu-lar system to the effects of circulating catechol-amines [64]. Glucocorticoids have been shown to induce the expression of adrenergic recep-tors [65] and to inhibit catecholamine metabo-lism. The mineralocorticoid effects of steroids enhance intracellular calcium levels, resulting in improved myocardial contractility and increased myocardial and vascular smooth muscle response to catecholamine.

The safety and efficacy of using hydrocorti-sone in the treatment of hypotension in preterm babies is as yet unproven. Steroids have tradi-tionally been used in the treatment of persistent hypotension that has not responded to fluid therapy and inotropic support.

A Cochrane review by Ibrahim et al. published in 2011 analyzed four studies totaling 123 babies [66]. Corticosteroid therapy for preterm infants with hypotension refractory to volume expansion and dopamine treatment was shown to be associ-ated with a statistically significant reduction in persisting hypotension [67]. No statistically sig-nificant effects on long- or short-term mortality outcomes were found. No significant short-term adverse consequences have been reported with the use of short, low-dose regimes. However, studies using higher, cumulative doses of steroids in the treatment of chronic lung disease have reported an increased incidence of intestinal perforation,

The diagnosis & management of hypotension in neonates Review

Page 8: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

Future Cardiol. (2013) 9(5)8 future science group

fungal infections and potential long-term adverse effects on neurodevelopment [68].

ConclusionHypotension is a commonly encountered prob-lem in neonatal critical care. It is being increas-ingly acknowledged that blood pressure is a poor marker of organ perfusion in newborns and that organ perfusion is a much more impor-tant determinant of morbidity and mortality than blood pressure, particularly with respect to neurological outcome.

Several techniques exist and several more are in development for the assessment of tissue per-fusion, vascular filling and cardiac function. These can help form a picture of the pathol-ogy causing decreased tissue perfusion. The decision as to whether or not to treat hypo-tension, and whether to use volume expansion, inotropes or other therapies rests on the judg-ment of the clinician based on the information available. There is scope for more research and development into noninvasive means of assess-ing hemodynamics. Echocardiography carries

Executive summary

Background�n Hypotension is a common problem in sick newborns, especially in preterm babies.�n Definition of hypotension has so far proved to be difficult, especially in the preterm population.�n Blood pressure is a marker for organ circulation.�n Systemic blood pressure (SBP) correlates poorly with systemic blood flow as measured by superior vena cava (SVC) flow.�n Poor SVC flow is strongly correlated with adverse outcomes.

Neonatal physiology & the etiology of circulatory failure: a practical approach to assessment of organ perfusion�n SVC flow is the gold standard in assessing organ perfusion, but is technically demanding and cannot provide continuous real-time

monitoring.�n Capillary refill time correlates poorly with skin perfusion and hypovolemia.�n Echocardiography is gaining increasing importance in the assessment of cardiac output and contractility, vascular filling and SVC flow.�n Serial lactic acid measurements can be useful in the detection of anaerobic metabolism in underperfused tissues.�n Urine output is an insensitive marker of tissue hypoperfusion.�n New techniques such as near infrared spectroscopy, white light spectroscopy and laser Doppler are showing promise as noninvasive

means of providing real-time monitoring of tissue and cerebral perfusion.

Treatment strategies– Volume expansion

– No evidence for routine administration of volume expansion in very preterm and extremely low-birth weight infants.

– There is significant debate as to which fluid to use in hypotensive babies: crystalloids, albumin, plasma or gelatine-based substitutes. No significant differences in benefits have been found.

– No studies comparing packed cell transfusions to other fluids exist.

– Feto–placental transfusion techniques have been studied and found to decrease the incidence of hypotension and the need for transfusion, but not to affect mortality.

– Vasopressors

– Vasopressor drugs may also have chronotropic and inotropic effects, which will have a complex effect on the newborn’s circulatory system and not necessarily result in preserved organ perfusion, despite responses in SBP.

– Dopamine is frequently utilized as a first-line vasopressor.

– Newborns treated with dopamine have been shown to have the same mortality as those treated with albumin, but have better SBP responses.

– Newborns treated with dopamine and dobutamine have been shown to have similar morbidity and mortality rates. However, the use of dopamine elicits a stronger SBP response.

– Steroids

– Steroids are usually reserved for refractory hypotension. No significant differences in morbidity and mortality have been shown in newborns treated with hydrocortisone compared with those treated with volume expansion or dopamine.

– There are concerns that steroids may affect long-term neurological outcome.

Conclusion�n Development of new techniques for noninvasive real-time assessment of tissue perfusion is important to allow targeted therapies that

would minimize the chances of adverse effects and optimize response.�n Echocardiography is playing an increasingly important role in the management of the sick newborn and is rapidly becoming a core skill

in neonatology.�n A consensus needs to be reached on the definition of neonatal circulatory failure.

Review Farrugia, Rojas & Rabe

Page 9: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

www.futuremedicine.com 9future science group

great promise in this respect, but requires train-ing of operators and a significant investment in equipment.

All therapies available have potential delete-rious effects on the newborn. More research is required into the pharmacokinetics and effects of drugs and fluids on the newborn population, and how these are affected by gestational age, birth weight and comorbidities.

Future perspectiveTwo large collaborative projects funded by the EU-FP7 framework are addressing the research question about a new definition of neonatal cir-culatory failure. In addition, the HIP trial will study an age-appropriate formulation of dopa-mine [103]. The Neocirculation consortium will do the same for dobutamine [104]. The consortia will pool their results together with the Safe-BoosC study group in order to develop a new

AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank P Nuntnarumit and M Turner for permission to reprint their figure and table, respectively.

Financial & competing interests disclosureH Rabe and H Rojas are members of the Neocirculation consortium. H Rabe conducted industry-sponsored studies on white light spectroscopy and acted as a paid advisor for MBR Optical systems (Wuppertal, Ger-many). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

ReferencesPapers of special note have been highlighted as:n of interestnn of considerable interest

1. Fanaroff AA, Fanaroff JM. Short- and long-term consequences of hypotension in ELBW infants. Semin. Perinatol. 30(3), 151–155 (2006).

2. Nuntnarumit P, Yang W, Bada-Ellzey HS. Blood pressure measurements in the newborn. Clin. Perinatol. 26(4), 981–996 (1999).

n� Establishes blood pressure norms for term and preterm newborns.

3. Seri I, Abbasi S, Wood DC, Gerdes JS. Regional hemodynamic effects of dopamine in the sick preterm neonate. J. Pediatr. 133(6), 728–734 (1998).

4. Bada HS, Korones SB, Perry EH et al. Mean arterial blood pressure changes in premature infants and those at risk for intraventricular hemorrhage. J. Pediatr. 117(4), 607–614 (1990).

5. Weindling AM. Blood pressure monitoring in the newborn. Arch. Dis. Child. 64(4 Spec No), 444–447 (1989).

6. Bauer K, Linderkamp O, Versmold HT. Systolic blood pressure and blood volume in preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. 69(5 Spec No), 521–522 (1993).

n� Establishes that hypotension is not a reliable marker of low blood volume in preterm infants.

7. Miall-Allen VM, de Vries LS, Whitelaw AG. Mean arterial blood pressure and neonatal cerebral lesions. Arch. Dis. Child. 62(10), 1068–1069 (1987).

8. Washburn LK, Dillard RG, Goldstein DJ, Klinepeter KL, deRegnier R-A, O’Shea TM. Survival and major neurodevelopmental impairment in extremely low gestational age newborns born 1990–2000: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 7, 20 (2007).

9. Low JA, Froese AB, Galbraith RS, Smith JT, Sauerbrei EE, Derrick EJ. The association between preterm newborn hypotension and hypoxemia and outcome during the first year. Acta Paediatr. Oslo Nor. 82(5), 433–437 (1993).

10. Diprose GK, Evans DH, Archer LN, Levene MI. Dinamap fails to detect hypotension in very low birthweight infants. Arch. Dis. Child. 61(8), 771–773 (1986).

11. Meyer S, Sander J, Gräber S, Gottschling S, Gortner L. Agreement of invasive versus noninvasive blood pressure in preterm neonates is not dependent on birth weight or gestational age. J. Paediatr. Child Health 46(5), 249–254 (2010).

12. Cunningham S, Symon AG, McIntosh N. Changes in mean blood pressure caused by damping of the arterial pressure waveform. Early Hum. Dev. 36(1), 27–30 (1994).

13. Groves AM, Kuschel CA, Knight DB, Skinner JR. Relationship between blood pressure and blood flow in newborn preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 93(1), F29–F32 (2008).

14. Seri I. Circulatory support of the sick preterm infant. Semin. Neonatol. 6(1), 85–95 (2001).

nn� Gives a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology of hypotension in preterm infants and identifies current treatment strategies and dilemmas.

15. Evans N, Kluckow M. Early determinants of right and left ventricular output in ventilated preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 74(2), F88–F94 (1996).

16. Pladys P, Wodey E, Beuchée A, Branger B, Bétrémieux P. Left ventricle output and mean arterial blood pressure in preterm infants during the 1st day of life. Eur. J. Pediatr. 158(10), 817–824 (1999).

17. Gorelick MH, Shaw KN, Baker MD. Effect of ambient temperature on capillary refill in healthy children. Pediatrics 92(5), 699–702 (1993).

18. Leonard PA, Beattie TF. Is measurement of capillary refill time useful as part of the initial assessment of children? Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 11(3), 158–163 (2004).

19. Osborn D, Evans N, Kluckow M. Clinical detection of low upper body blood flow in very premature infants using blood pressure, capillary refill time, and central-peripheral temperature difference. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89(2), F168–F173 (2004).

20. Rabe H, Alvarez RF, Whitfield T, Lawson F, Jungmann H. Spectroscopic noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin compared with capillary and venous values in neonates. Neonatology 98(1), 1–5 (2010).

21. Genzel-Boroviczény O, Strötgen J, Harris AG, Messmer K, Christ F. Orthogonal polarization spectral imaging (OPS): a novel method to measure the microcirculation in term and preterm infants transcutaneously. Pediatr. Res. 51(3), 386–391 (2002).

22. Raju TN, Stevenson DK, Higgins RD, Stark AR. Safe and effective devices and instruments for use in the neonatal intensive care units: NICHD Workshop summary.

definition of neonatal shock, as well as guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.

The diagnosis & management of hypotension in neonates Review

Page 10: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

Future Cardiol. (2013) 9(5)10 future science group

Biomed. Instrum. Technol. Assoc. Adv. Med. Instrum. 43(5), 408–418 (2009).

nn� Review of noninvasive techniques available or under study for cardiovascular assessments in newborn infants.

23. Tyszczuk L, Meek J, Elwell C, Wyatt JS. Cerebral blood flow is independent of mean arterial blood pressure in preterm infants undergoing intensive care. Pediatrics 102(2 Pt 1), 337–341 (1998).

24. Rolfe P, Wickramasinghe YA, Thorniley MS et al. Fetal and neonatal cerebral oxygen monitoring with NIRS: theory and practice. Early Hum. Dev. 29(1–3), 269–273 (1992).

25. Lehr HP, Wickramasinghe Y. New prototype NIRS instrument [corrected] to investigate multi-regional cerebral blood and tissue oxygenation and haemodynamics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38(3), 281–286 (2000).

26. Skinner JR. Echocardiography on the neonatal unit: a job for the neonatologist or the cardiologist? Arch. Dis. Child. 78(5), 401–402 (1998).

27. Cerini E. Evaluation of echocardiography in the neonatal unit. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 25(Suppl. 4), 52 (2012).

28. Evans N, Kluckow M, Simmons M, Osborn D. Which to measure, systemic or organ blood flow? Middle cerebral artery and superior vena cava flow in very preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 87(3), F181–F184 (2002).

29. Hunt RW, Evans N, Rieger I, Kluckow M. Low superior vena cava flow and neurodevelopment at 3 years in very preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 145(5), 588–592 (2004).

nn� Establishes a link between poor superior vena cava flow in the neonatal period and poor long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

30. Osborn DA, Evans N, Kluckow M, Bowen JR, Rieger I. Low superior vena cava flow and effect of inotropes on neurodevelopment to 3 years in preterm infants. Pediatrics 120(2), 372–380 (2007).

31. Sinha AK, Cane C, Kempley ST. Blood flow in the common carotid artery in term and preterm infants: reproducibility and relation to cardiac output. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 91(1), F31–F35 (2006).

32. Bennet L, Quaedackers JS, Gunn AJ, Rossenrode S, Heineman E. The effect of asphyxia on superior mesenteric artery blood flow in the premature sheep fetus. J. Pediatr. Surg. 35(1), 34–40 (2000).

33. Kempley ST, Gamsu HR. Superior mesenteric artery blood flow velocity in necrotising enterocolitis. Arch. Dis. Child. 67(7 Spec No), 793–796 (1992).

34. Fauchère JC, Bauschatz AS, Arlettaz R, Zimmermann-Bär U, Bucher HU. Agreement between capillary and arterial lactate in the newborn. Acta Paediatr. Oslo Nor. 91(1), 78–81 (2002).

35. Ward Platt M, Deshpande S. Metabolic adaptation at birth. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 10(4), 341–350 (2005).

36. Moran M, Miletin J, Pichova K, Dempsey EM. Cerebral tissue oxygenation index and superior vena cava blood flow in the very low-birth weight infant. Acta Paediatr. Oslo Nor. 98(1), 43–46 (2009).

37. Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K et al. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit. Care Med. 37(2), 666–688 (2009).

38. Osborn DA, Evans N. Early volume expansion for prevention of morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD002055 (2009).

39. Ekblad H, Kero P, Korvenranta H. Renal function in preterm infants during the first five days of life: influence of maturation and early colloid treatment. Biol. Neonate. 61(5), 308–317 (1992).

40. Beverley DW, Pitts-Tucker TJ, Congdon PJ, Arthur RJ, Tate G. Prevention of intraventricular haemorrhage by fresh frozen plasma. Arch. Dis. Child. 60(8), 710–713 (1985).

41. A randomized trial comparing the effect of prophylactic intravenous fresh frozen plasma, gelatin or glucose on early mortality and morbidity in preterm babies. The Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative [NNNI] Trial Group. Eur. J. Pediatr. 155(7), 580–588 (1996).

42. Kattwinkel J, Niermeyer S, Nadkarni V et al. ILCOR Advisory Statement: Resuscitation of the Newly Born Infant An Advisory Statement From the Pediatric Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation 99(14), 1927–1938 (1999).

43. So KW, Fok TF, Ng PC, Wong WW, Cheung KL. Randomised controlled trial of colloid or crystalloid in hypotensive preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 76(1), F43–F46 (1997).

44. Lynch SK, Mullett MD, Graeber JE, Polak MJ. A comparison of albumin-bolus therapy versus normal saline-bolus therapy for hypotension in neonates. J. Perinatol. 28(1), 29–33 (2008).

45. Rabe H, Diaz-Rossello JL, Duley L, Dowswell T. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental

transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 8, CD003248 (2012).

46. McDonald SJ, Middleton P. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD004074 (2008).

47. Hosono S, Mugishima H, Fujita H et al. Blood pressure and urine output during the first 120 h of life in infants born at less than 29 weeks’ gestation related to umbilical cord milking. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 94(5), F328–F331 (2009).

48. Hosono S, Mugishima H, Fujita H et al. Umbilical cord milking reduces the need for red cell transfusions and improves neonatal adaptation in infants born at less than 29 weeks’ gestation: a randomised controlled trial. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 93(1), F14–F19 (2008).

49. Raju TNK. Timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth for optimizing placental transfusion. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 25(2), 180–187 (2013).

50. Turner MA, Baines P. Which inotrope and when in neonatal and paediatric intensive care? Arch. Dis. Child. Educ. Pr. Ed. 96(6), 216–222 (2011).

nn� Comprehensive review of inotropic support in newborns and pediatric patients, complete with pharmacological properties and doses.

51. Dougherty M, Webb ST. Do inotropes really have a future? Anaesthesia 66(11), 972–976 (2011).

52. Bhatt-Mehta V, Nahata MC, McClead RE, Menke JA. Dopamine pharmacokinetics in critically ill newborn infants. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 40(6), 593–597 (1991).

53. Martinez AM, Padbury JF, Thio S. Dobutamine pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular responses in critically ill neonates. Pediatrics 89(1), 47–51 (1992).

54. Zaritsky A, Lotze A, Stull R, Goldstein DS. Steady-state dopamine clearance in critically ill infants and children. Crit. Care Med. 16(3), 217–220 (1988).

55. Padbury JF, Agata Y, Baylen BG et al. Dopamine pharmacokinetics in critically ill newborn infants. J. Pediatr. 110(2), 293–298 (1987).

56. Schranz D, Stopfkuchen H, Jüngst BK, Clemens R, Emmrich P. Hemodynamic effects of dobutamine in children with cardiovascular failure. Eur. J. Pediatr. 139(1), 4–7 (1982).

57. Stopfkuchen H, Schranz D, Huth R, Jüngst BK. Effects of dobutamine on left ventricular performance in newborns as determined by systolic time intervals. Eur. J. Pediatr. 146(2), 135–139 (1987).

Review Farrugia, Rojas & Rabe

Page 11: Review - Semantic Scholarpdfs.semanticscholar.org/c2a8/0aacf0c5f1be4a7df65ffae3e8c0b62f164b.pdf · can be assessed by timing capillary refill and measuring central–peripheral temperature

Author Pro

of

www.futuremedicine.com 11future science group

58. Filippi L, Pezzati M, Poggi C, Rossi S, Cecchi A, Santoro C. Dopamine versus dobutamine in very low birthweight infants: endocrine effects. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 92(5), F367–F371 (2007).

59. Osborn DA, Evans N. Early volume expansion versus inotrope for prevention of morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD002056 (2001).

60. Gill AB, Weindling AM. Randomised controlled trial of plasma protein fraction versus dopamine in hypotensive very low birthweight infants. Arch. Dis. Child. 69(3 Spec No), 284–287 (1993).

61. Lundstrøm K, Pryds O, Greisen G. The haemodynamic effects of dopamine and volume expansion in sick preterm infants. Early Hum. Dev. 57(2), 157–163 (2000).

62. Osborn DA, Evans N, Kluckow M. Left ventricular contractility in extremely premature infants in the first day and response to inotropes. Pediatr. Res. 61(3), 335–340 (2007).

63. Shivanna B. Vasopressin and its analogs for the treatment of refractory hypotension in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (3), CD009171 (2013).

64. Hausdorff WP, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ. Turning off the signal: desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptor function. Faseb J. 4(11), 2881–2889 (1990).

65. Korte C, Styne D, Merritt TA, Mayes D, Wertz A, Helbock HJ. Adrenocortical function in the very low-birth weight infant: improved testing sensitivity and association with neonatal outcome. J. Pediatr. 128(2), 257–263 (1996).

66. Ibrahim H, Sinha IP, Subhedar NV. Corticosteroids for treating hypotension in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (12), CD003662 (2011).

67. Gaissmaier RE, Pohlandt F. Single-dose dexamethasone treatment of hypotension in preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 134(6), 701–705 (1999).

68. O’Shea TM, Kothadia JM, Klinepeter KL et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of a 42-day tapering course of dexamethasone to reduce the duration of ventilator dependency in very low-birth weight infants: outcome of study participants at 1-year adjusted age. Pediatrics 104(1 Pt 1), 15–21 (1999).

69. Wong HR, Cvijanovich N, Wheeler DS et al. Interleukin-8 as a stratification tool for interventional trials involving pediatric septic shock. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 178(3), 276–282 (2008).

70. Mestan K, Yu Y, Thorsen P et al. Cord blood biomarkers of the fetal inflammatory response. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 22(5), 379–387 (2009).

71. Nishimaki S, Sato M, An H et al. Comparison of markers for fetal inflammatory response syndrome: fetal blood interleukin-6 and neonatal urinary beta(2)-microglobulin. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 35(3), 472–476 (2009).

72. Miletin J, Pichova K, Doyle S, Dempsey EM. Serum cortisol values, superior vena cava flow and illness severity scores in very low-birth weight infants. J. Perinatol. 30(8), 522–526 (2010).

Websites101. SafeBoosC.

www.safeboosc.eu

102. Newborn life support guidelines. www.resus.org.uk/pages/nls.pdf

103. Management of hypotension in the preterm extremely low gestational age newborn. HIP trial. www.hip-trial.com

104. Neocirculation. www.neocirculation.eu

The diagnosis & management of hypotension in neonates Review