SEP-07-2010 21:03 P.002AMENDMENT OF SOUCITATIONIMODIFICATION OF CONTRACT BPA NO. I. CONTRACT 1 COoL PAOQ Of

II1 1 22. MIEND0M•NTMMODIFICATION NO. 3. IFKRICTVE DATE 4, REQU TIONPUR-IcASE REQ. NO, 0. PROJECT NO.pap;Akbla)

M005 Soo Block 15c. NRC-42-08-064 T4M50806404182-08041

6. ,sueooY CODE 3100 7.AD. .4STER MBY N m.om 0006 3100

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commzision U.S. Nuclear Regulatore CommissionDiv. of Contracts DiV. Of ContraCtsAttn: Jeffrey R. Mitchell, 301-492-3639 Mail Stop: TWa-01-B1OMmail Stop: TWB-O1-BIOMwashington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20555

e. NA•I ANDADDRES OF CONTRATR4 (No. abOat in. SandZPCod) Z N O

INFORMATION SYSTEMS LABORATORIES, INCISL OIDATED (SECrT•miijATTN: DR. JAMES F. MEYER

11140 ROCKVILLE PIKE, SUITZ 500 10O. MODWFiCATION O• CONTRACT17RaR NO.NfýC-42-08-064 NRC-T004

ROCKVILLE MD 20852,_ :.. .. 10• DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE 107928806 IFACLrrY oDE X. !02ý13-200911. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOUCITATIONS

SThe above numbered solldntatin Is amended as set forth In Item 14. The hour and date 4psecfied for rece•pt of Offers I is extended, 7 Is not extended.Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the folowng methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15. and returning _ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknomedging receipt of ýis amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which Includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbýM.. FAILURE OF" YOUR AC-KNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAYRESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amnendment you desire to change an offer already submItted, such change may be madeby telegram or letter, prvvided each telegram or letter makes reference to the soIlictation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hourand date -. it--d I

12, ACCOUNTINO AND APMPNORLDTION DATA VI MOMur) 025-15-171-103 04182 252A 31x0200.025Obligate 4100,000.00

I13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTSIORiDERS,

IT MODlIFI•: THI4 C(I•NTRA•rTIARn3FR ,Nf t• ni rm:Rlllrl 3M I'rlM ,IA

(X) A, THIS CHANCE ORDER I8 i8euo PURJSVAT TOt (6pe.yawcloft THE CHANOES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACTORDER NO. IN rrEm ioA

0. THE ABOVE NUMBERE-D CONTRACTORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THIC AMINSTRATIVI CHANGES (ouch as dungoa In pafynt offia, appmpftdon data, at--)SET FORTH- IN ITEM~ 14, PURSUANTr TO THE AUTHORITY OF rAA 43103(54

C. THIS SUPPLENENTALAGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF. Bilatera1;;

x Mutual Agreement of the Parlties

D. OTHER (Sfdfy lype ol modkloofion and aulhoriy)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ is not, [ Is required to sign this document and return 1 copies tothe issuing office.

14, DeCMFrTIQN OFAM.ENOMENTIMQDIICAT1ON (Organ4ze oy UCF soalOn hanolviga b~bInoldn azqVc ~~Wieaccuole mmanr whiom faaslbl.)

....................... REFER TO ATTACH=E PAGE TWO FOR A DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATION 0 FIVE ......

Exopca. pI* %e. pr erd h , W1 iw*ano~ wouý ofn ft 0, Ovp~w .vfpvncd In Mw, SAh ow tA, as hweldoft dtaMWe, r,4¶alfa U teNgad and In full tworw. *no I ot

16KýJ1IZ AND TITLE OF SIGNEJ rrYP6 or Pfh 1& KSAM. N AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OPITCER (rypa or PwIM)

Jeffrey Rt. MitCh eE~or.-r ~COflr 91-rg 0 Cer

1 1 =01FFISC. DATE 8IGNEDi!3 T/GE

... .. I i - , ; o(SIOUim'0 emnauft~ze b on)0A~idfqnfMU ofki

NSN 754t.O1-152-807PREVIOUS EDITON4 NOT USABLE

I PIrATI 001N SUINSI REVIEWCiMI SEP 2 4 2010

STAJ4DAID FOR 3 (REV. 10.63)PnoeCflbd DY GMA- FAR 146 CFII) 53243

41090

ý:;E?-UY-ZU1U zi:UJ

NRC-42-08-064 NRC-T004 M005

The purpose of this modification is to (1) to incorporate the revised task order Statem,contract ceiling by $136,722.00 from $611,252.00 to $747,974.00 and (3) provide inclof $100,000.00 thereby increasing the total obligations from $611,252.00 to $711,252order is modified as follows:

ýnt of Work, (2) increase the'emental funding in the amount.00. Accordingly, the subject task

Refer to the Task Order No. 04 "Statement of Work" is here by deleted in its entirety and replaced with the followingStatement of Work attached to this Modification No. 4 entitled "Statement of Work Re•, 2".

Task Order No. 04 shall be in effect from January 28, 2009 through March 31, 2011,,$747,974.00. The amount of $697,413.00 represents the estimated reimbursable cosrepresents the fixed fee.

The ýamount obligated by the Government with respect to this task order is $711,252.represents the estimated reimbursable costs, and the amount of $48,079.00 represer

fvith a cost ceiling of's, and the amount of $50,561.00

)0, of which $663,173.00ts the fixed fee.

****ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SUBJECT TASK ORDER REVlAIN UNCHANGED'"

Page 2

SEP-07-2010 21:03 P.004

REVISION NO. 2

TASK ORDER STATEMENT OF WORK

JCN Contractor Task OrderI No.

Q-4182 Information Systems NRC-42-08-064 - TO 4 (MOD 5)Laboratories, Inc.

Applicant Design/Site Docket No.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries US-APWR 5200021

Review of M-RELAP5 to Support US-APWRTAC No. B&R Number SRP or ESI P Section(s)

RX061 1 J025-15-171-103 Chapter 15NRC Task Order Project Officer (PO) .

Rachel Glaros 301-415-3672 Raohel.dlaros@nrc.govNRC Tochnical Monitor (TM) I

Jeff Schmidt 301-415-4016 Jeffrey.Schmldt2@nrc.gov

1.0 BACKGROUND

Combined Operating License (COL) Applications are submitted pursuant Ithe Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 52), "Early Site Permits; Stand,Certifications; and Combined Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants." The U.Commission (NRC) reviews COL Applications based on information fumiscompanies pursuant to 10 CFR 52.79, "Contents of Applications Technica

A Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800) is prepared for the guidance of sOffice of New Reactors in performing safety reviews of applications to cornuclear power plants and the review of applications to approve standard cnuclear power plants. The principal purpose of the SRP is to assure the q1staff safety reviews.

An Environmental Safety Review Plan (NUREG-1 555) is prepared for thereviewers in performing environmental reviews of applications related to nThe ESRPs are companions to regulatory guides that address siting andAs with NUREG-0800 the purpose of the ESRP is to assure the quality arenvironmental reviews.

o Part 52 of Title 10 ofrd DesignS. Nuclear Regulatoryhed by electric utilityI Information."

taff reviewers in the: truct or operatesigns and sites for

ýality and uniformity of

guidance of staffjclear power plants..nvironmental issues.d uniformity of

The staff publishes the results of these reviews in a Safety Evaluation ReI•ort (SER).

2.0 OBJECTIVE

The objective of this task order is to obtain technical expertise in evaluatirrevised (Option 6) MRELAP code to model US-APWR SBLOCA accidentevaluate if the appropriate equations, numerical solutions, nodalization usadequacy of validation test matrix.

g the adequacy of thes. Review shouldtd as well as the

Updated March 15, 2010

SEP-07-2010 21:03 P.005

-2-

3.0 WORK REQUIREMEN.TS SCHEDULE AND DELIVERABLES

*ý ITL .

V,ý 0M, MIA'Nowtv"."M -*ý;1 ýZIMITI'-1. REQUIREMENT: Review SBLOCA Topical

Report (MUAP-07013) to become familiar withmodels, methods, PIRT, validation test matrixand general results

STANDARD: Written confirmation thatfamiliarization is complete.

2 weeks afterauthorization ofwork

Notification thatreading has beencompleted

2. REQUIREMENT: Participate in an 3 weeks after N/Aorientation/kick-off meeting with the NRC staff authorizationto discuss the scope of the work, expectationsand contract management

STANDARD: Attendance: by individualsdesignated by NRC.

Updated March 15, 2010

SEP-07-2010 21:03 P.006

-3-

3. REQUIREMENT: Review fundamental Twelve (12) Technicalequations, numerical methods, correlation(s) months following Evaluation Reportvalidity relative-to SBLOCA physical Task 2 and RAls.

phenomena. Determine If theory, numericalmethods and correlations are used within theirapplicable ranges or limitations exist whichhave not been indentified or documented,

Review latest (Option 5) MRELAP code used Three (3) months Revised Technicalfor SBLOCA. Prepare any additional RAls after authorization Evaluation Reportand revise the Technical Evaluation Report. of modification and RAis

STANDARD: Completed Technical EvaluationReport that follows the NRC provided templatewithout deviation. No deviation from theguidance defined in Section III, RA] Guidanceof Attachmentl. One round of commentincorporation is acceptable.

a. Review code validation testcase matrix for completeness,identify any deficiencies.Review and -evaluate validationtest cases presented in MUAP-07013 and determine ifpresented results are similar toother industry acceptedSBLOCA model resultsl

b. Independently created modelmaybe used as an aid toevaluate validation test cases.Determine any code inputlimitations or ranges ofapplicability when modelingSBLOCA accidents.

o. Review revised MRELAP5 codevalidation test cases matrix forcompleteness, identify anydeficiencies.

d. Setup and exerciseindependent model(s) toevaluate the revised MRELAP5code.

Updated March 15, 2010

SEP-07-2010 21:04 F. 007

-4-

! 77 =1; 7- -; 1ý117ý,7-0.-I" I~i F- -7,

---.----.- I-.---,-~.-~.-.-.,-.--.-- a

4. REQUIREMENT: Review response to theRAIs to determine if they adequately resolvethe outstanding issues. Identify any other openitems. Incorporate the review results in theevaluation report completed under Task 3.

Review any RAI responses related to thelatest (Option 5) revised MRELAP code andincorporate the review results into thetechnical evaluation report.

STANDARD: Completed Technical EvaluationReport that follows the NRC provided templatewithout deviation. No deviation from theguidance defined in Section III, RAI Guidanceof Attachment1. One round of commentincorporation is acceptable.

Four (4) weeksafter receipt of theresponses.

Three (3) weeksafter receipt ofrevised RELAP5model RAIresponses.

Revised TechnicalEvaluation Reportand any follow-upRAIs

5. REQUIREMENT: (if applicable) Prepare forand travel to the applicant's office andparticipate in an NRC review team to:

a. Audit the applicant as determined by NRCTechnical Lead

b, Evaluate and discuss the applicant'sresponses to the unresolved issuesidentified in Task 4 to determine if theoutstanding issues are adequatelyresolved-

c, Prepare a trip report (as an input to NRCAudit Report) to summarize the informationreviewed, results of the audit, and meetingdiscussions.

Prepare for and participate in follow-onaudits at the applicant's office, if required.Prepare trip reports.

STANDARD: Complete evaluation as definedin Task. Submit Trip Report withinweeks of site review.

Two (2) weeksfollowing audit

Trip Report

__________________________________________________ & ____________________

Updated March 15, 2010

SEP-07-2010 21:04 P.O008

-5-

6. REQUIREMENT: Review the applicant's Three (3) weeks Safety Evaluationresponse to the open items identified as a following Report Inputresult of the design audit(s) (Tasks 4 & 5)., completion of w/open itemsIdentify any unresolved issues and prepare a Task 5safety evaluation report w/open items if any,as a Technical Evaluation Report.

STANDARD: Complete Technical EvaluationReport that follows the NRC provided templatewithout deviation.

7. REQUIREMENT: As needed and requested TBD Prepareby the staff, provide technical support to the Presentationstaff during related ACRS meetings and Materials, Attendhearing proceedings. Meetings, if

requiredSTANDARD: Ensure presentation materialsare reviewed and approved by NRC staff.

I

*These Work Schedules are subject to change by the NRC Contracting Cfficethe needs of the NRC Licensing Program Plan.

The Technical Monitor may issue technical instruction from time to time througof this task order. Technical instructions must be within the general staterFentdelineated in the task order and shall not constitute new assignments of I rksuch a nature as to justify an adjustment in cost or period of performance. Threfer to Section G. 1 of the base contract for further information and guidar ceodirections issued under this task order.

Any modifications to the scope of work, cost or period of performance of this tzissued by the CO and will be coordinated with the NRO Project Officer.

4.0 TECHNICAL AND OTHER SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED

r (CO) to support

hout the durationof work

or changes ofe contractor shallin any technical

isk order must be

As specified in the base contract, the contractor shall provide individuals Vho have the requirededucational background and work experience to meet the objectives of the work specified in thistask order. Specific qualifications for this effort include: a) expertise and Pperience in analysisof nuclear reactor thermal-hydraulics, b) expertise in use of the RELAP-5 computer code, c)expertise and familiarity with NRC regulations pertaining to analysis of nu~lear reactor thermal-hydraulics, LOCA and Non-LOCA analyses under the standard review pl'n (SRP) Sections 4,0and Chapter 15, d) familiarity with requests for additional information (RAI) development, and e)experience and familiarity with development of technical evaluation report (TER) supportingpositions developed during the review of APWR reactor designs.

NOTE: Work on this task order will involve the handling of proprietary information.

Updated March 15, 2010

SEP-07-2010 21:04 P.OO08

-6-

The contractor shall provide a contractor project manager (PM) to oversee the effort and ensurethe timely submittal of quality deliverables so that all information is accurate and complete asdefined in the base contract,

The NRC will rely on representations made by the contractor concerning tle qualifications of thepersonnel assigned to this task order, including assurance that all information contained in thetechnical and cost proposals, including resumes, is accurate and truthful, I'he resume for eachprofessional proposed to work under this task order (contractor, subcontrator, or consultant)shall describe the individual's experience in applying his or her area of engineeringspecialization to work in the proposed area. The use of particular person el on this contract issubject to the NRC technical monitor's (TM's) approval. This includes any proposed changes tokey personnel during the life of the task order.

5.0 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Task Order Progress Report

The contractor shall provide a bi-weekly progress report summarizing acoe'expenditures, contractor staff hours expended, percent completed for eaclorder, and any problems encountered by the contractor. The report shallthe NRC TM, Task Order Project Officer (PO) and CO.

Please refer to Sebtion F of the basic contract award document for contra(requirements.

Technical reportina requirements

Unless otherwise specified above, the contractor shall provide all deliveralThe NRC TM will review all draft deliverables (and coordinate any internalneeded) and provide comments back to the contractor. The contractor sh,deliverable based on the comments provided by the TM, and then deliverdeliverable. When mutually agreed upon between the contractor and the'may submit preliminary or partial drafts to help gauge the contractor's undparticular work requirement.

The contractor shall provide the following deliverables in hard copy and elielectronic format shall be provided in MS Word or other word processing sthe TM. For each deliverable, the contractor shall provide one hard copyboth the PM and the TM. The schedule for deliverables shall be containe(project plan for the task order effort.

In all correspondence, include identifying information: JCN No.: Q-4182; TControl No. (TAC), RX061 1; Task Order._4; and the licensee: Mitsubishi H(the site: N/A.,

1. At the completion of Task 3, submit a Technical Evaluation Reportfor each Sub-section of the SER (see Attachment I for the outlineof the report): a description of the information proposed by the appassumptions for the analysis, design, and references to consensus

implishments,itask under this taskbe sent via e-mail to

t reporting

4les as draft products.NRC staff review, ifall revise the drafthe final version of theM, the contractor

ýrstanding of the

Lctronic formats. Theoftware approved bynd electronic copy toI in the approved

nchnical Assignment:avy Industries; and,

(TER) that contains,format and content

icant including thestandards: review

Updated March 15, 2010

SEP-07-2010 21:04 P. 010

-7-

findings (including the basis for the findings), as a result of compaguidelines: and a list of "Requests for Additional Information (RAIs)in Appendix J of the base contract SOW for the guidelines for dej

2. At the completion of Task 4, submit a TER (see Attachment 1) thaof the review results and the updated report completed under Taslýfindings from the resolution of the RAls. Include a separate list of titems and the basis for such determination.

3. At the completion of Task 5 (if applicable), submit a trip report, as areport, that contains a summary of documents audited, a summarydiscussion conducted with the applicant, list of outstanding issues,issues, and the basis for the conclusion. Incorporate the findings irunder Task 3.

4. At the completion of Task 6, submit a TER (see Attachment 1) thaevaluation report with open items resulting from the work performeupdate of the Technical Evaluation Report developed under Task 5

6.0 MEETINGS AND TRAVEL

One 2-person, 1-day working meeting to kickoff project and contractor orie

(if required) Three, 2-person, 2-day trip to the applicant's local facility (Tas

One 2-person, 1-day working meetings at NRC headquarters to review del

One, 2-person, 2-day meetings, if needed, for hearing or ACRS meeting.

(any additional trips that may be required)

'At the discretion of the NRC TM, meeting may be conducted via telephone or video confe

7.0 NRC FURNISHED MATERIAL

The following NRC furnished materials will be provided to the contractor t¢

a. Topical Reports: SBLOCA (MUAP-07013).

b. CD-ROM containing the Final Safety Evaluation Report of the DCC

c. Latest (Option 5) revised MRELAP code used for SBLOCA

8.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

The period of performance is from January 28, 2009 through March 31, 20

9.0 OTHER APPLICABLE INFORMATION

a. License Fee Recovery

son with the review. See Attachment Ieloping RAls,

t contains a summary3 incorporating theie remaining open

n 'input to NRC auditof meetingsignificance of thesethe report developed

t contains a safetyJ in Task 4 & 5, and

ntation.*

s5).

iverables*

ence.

ether with SOW:

1.

Updated March 15. 2010

SEP-07-2010 21:04 P.011

• ~-8- 1

All work under this task order is/is not fee recoverable and must be chargTAC number(s).

b. Assumptions and Understandings:

The level of effort for'Task 3 is based on the assumption that the contractcreview procedures of (ESRPISRP) Sections 15.0

The level of effort for Task 4 is based on the assumption that there will beand it will take, on the average, 4.0 hours to review and address each res

The level of effort for Task 5 is based on two, two-person, two-day trip (incplus three days to prepare for the trips and one day to write the trip report,

The level of effort for Task 6 is based on the need to resolve 40 open itemthe average, 5 hours to review and resolve each open item, and prepare z

The level of effort in task 7 is based on requiring one trip to the site and oheadquarters.

It is assumed that the contractor has access to the NRC furnished materieInternet.

It is understood that the scope of the review consists of conference calls vwith the NRC staff and the applicant, to discuss open items in an attempt Iinformation or reach resolution.

.d to the appropriate

)r is familiar with the

30 additional RAIs)onse.

Iluding travel time)

s and it will take, onin SER.

ne trip to NRC

available on the

Mith the NRC staff, andlo obtain additional

The primary deliverable, or output of this regulatory review, shall be the T~chnical EvaluationReport (TER). The TER will serve as input to the NRC staff's Safety Eval ation Report (SER)which will document the NRC's technical, safety, and legal basis for approving the DCapplication. The TER must provide sufficient information to adequately explain the NRC staffsrationale for why there is reasonable assurance that public health and safety is protected. TheTER, and ultimately the SER, should be written in a manner whereby a person with a technical(non-nuclear) background and unfamiliar with the applicant's request could understand thebasis for the staff's conclusions. The TER format is described in Attachm:nt 1 to this TaskOrder Statement of Work.

Attachments:

1. Outline, Format, and Content for the TER input

Updated March 15, 2010

SEP-07-2010 21:04 P.0

Attachment IOutline, format and sampDle for the TER (draft SERI input)

X.Y.Z Title of Section

X.Y.Z, 1 Regulatorv Criteria

Develop an outline that follows the format and topics presented in the AREAS OF REVIEWsection of the appropriate SRP section. This information will correspond tb the SRP sectionsthat are the subject of this Task Order. For each unique SRP review area contained in the TER,the contractor should specify the acceptance criteria that were used for its review. Summarizethe applicable regulations and other regulatory references, including regulatory guides, genericletters, or NRC staff positions, that are relevant to this topic.

Technical reviewers are encouraged to use the descriptions of acceptance criteria frompreviously issued Safety Evaluation Reports for completed design certific tions (e.g., NUREG-1793 for the API 000 Final Safety Evaluation Report) when applicable.

X.Y.Z.2 Summary of Technical Information

Describe the key technical points that were made in the application. It is not necessary torestate the application verbatim or to address all the details in the application.

X.Y.Z.3 Technical Evaluation

Document the contractor's evauation of the application against the relevapt regulatory criteria.The evaluation should support the contractor's conclusions as to whether the regulations aremet. State what the contractor did to evaluate the applicant's submittal. lhe contractor'sevaluation may include verification that the applicant followed applicable regulatory guidance,performance of independent calculations, and validation that the approprilte assumptions weremade. The contractor may state that certain information provided by the applicant was notconsidered essential to the contractor's review and was not reviewed by tl'e contractor. Whilethe contractor may summarize the information offered by the applicant in support of itsapplication, the contractor should clearly articulate the bases for its conclulsions.

Contractor should provide a clear and concise description of any request fIor additionalinformation (RAls). The description should include a justification of the reqciested informationthat the requested information is not provided in the application and is abs lutely needed todetermine or confirm whether the relevant regulatory requirements (articulate specificrequirements) have been met. The contractor should discuss its technical 6valuation of thelicensee's response to the RAls and determine whether it is acceptable. Tie contractor shouldclearly articulate the bases for its acceptance or rejection. If the RAI response is not acceptable,it will be classified as an 'open item'. All open items will be resolved in Phase 3.

12

Updatod March 15, 2010

SEF'-UY-2U1U 21 :U4P.3 P. 013

X.Y.Z.4 Conclusions

Summarize the contractor's conclusions regarding the application, includinfollowing. As set forth above in Sections X.Y.Z.2 and X.Y.Z.3 of this reporbases for conclusions that follow]. Accordingly, the staff concludes that the[or, if applicable, does not meet] the relevant requirements of 10 CFR Partapplicable, is not] acceptable.

X.Y.Z.5 References

g words such as the[provide specific

application meetsXX and Is [or, if

Updated March 15, 2010

TOTAL P.013