rey ty political science roskin ch4 states

31
Rey Ty States Rey Ty

Upload: rey-t

Post on 15-Jul-2015

145 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Rey Ty

StatesRey Ty

Rey Ty

Source:•Michael G. Roskin, Robert L. Cord, James A. Medeiros, & Walter S. Jones. (2012). Political Science: An Introduction. New York: Pearson Longman.

Rey Ty

Nation and State

Nation

Population with common history, culture, language

State

Government structure, independent & sovereign

Rey Ty

Nation and State

French king & state created the French

nation

Framers of the U.S. Constitution created

the U.S. nation

Rey Ty

Institutionalized Power

Political institutions are the working structures of

government

Good institutions are flexible & change; they give stability

to the political system

Personalities create powers of institutions

Institutions are greater than individual leaders

Rey Ty

StatesEffective

States

Control & tax the whole country; laws are obeyed; no corruption; better off

Weak States

Crime; lawlessness, corruption, breakaway

movements; buy justice; rigged elections

Failed States

No real government; little control over country; warlords & criminal cartels; threats of

territorial break up

Rey Ty

AristotleWho Governs

Legitimate Forms:Rules in the Interest of All

Corrupt Forms:Rule in the Interest of Selves

One Monarchy Tyranny

Few Aristocracy Oligarchy

Many Polity Democracy

Rey Ty

Figurehead Monarchies

Denmark MonacoNether-

landsSpain U.K.

Rey Ty

True Monarchies (Muslim Countries)

KuwaitSaudi Arabia

Rey Ty

Most Countries Are…

Called Republics

but not all are

democratic

Rey Ty

Republics1. Some republics are

highly centralized.

2. Most policies come from the capital.

Rey Ty

Systems of Government

Unitary

Federal

Rey Ty

Unitary Systems1. The central government controls

everything (not federal system)

2. U.K. officially is unitary.

3. Many countries have devolved & decentralized over the years: U.K., France, Spain, etc.

Rey Ty

Pros & Cons of Unitary SystemsPros

1. Government is close to the people

2. People can influence local governments

3. Can experiment at local level

Cons

1. Local governments lack resources

2. Incompetent & corrupt local officials

3. Duplication & lack of coordination between local & national government

Not clear who is in charge: national or local government

Rey Ty

Federal System

Central government can’t easily override autonomy

& powers

One way to keep a country together, e.g. India at independence

Entities that would otherwise be weak have

stronger defense

Larger economy with no trade barriers; more

prosperous

Rey Ty

Pros & Cons of Fedeal SystemsPros

1. Centralized power solve many problems

2. Clear lines of authority

3. Easier policy coordination

Cons

1. Local governments can’t do simple tasks

2. Local governments may be ignored

Rey Ty

Modern Federal Systems

Russian Federation

Canadian Federalism:

Bilingual

Rey Ty

Electoral System

Single-Member Districts

Proportional Representation

Rey Ty

Electoral SystemsSingle-Member Districts

1. One person elected in each district

2. Third parties have little chance of winning many districts

Rey Ty

Single-Member DistrictsPros

1. Politics tend to be moderate (not extremes)

2. Usually one party gets majority in legislature

Cons

1. Artificial majority

2. Gerrymandering makes one party safe for most district seats

3. Stable and dull politics (unlike multiparty systems)

Rey Ty

Electoral SystemsProportional Representation

1. Multi-member districts where political party gets seats proportional to the votes it got

2. A minimum % of votes required to win a seat

Rey Ty

Proportional RepresentationPros

1. Legislature more accurately reflects party strength & public opinion

2. Parties have clear principles & don’t need to appeal to a broad center

Cons

1. Party splintering lead to multi-party systems

2. Coalitions needed, causing instability & inability to make important decisions

Rey Ty

Political Economy1. To what extent should the

state control the economy?

2. To what extent should the country’s wealth be redistributed to the poor?

Rey Ty

Political Economy

Laisse-Faire

Welfare State

Statism

Socialism

Rey Ty

Political Economy

Laissez-Faire

Government owns little industry & redistributes

little welfare

Welfare State

Government owns little industry but redistributes

wealth to poor (Scandinavia)

Rey Ty

Political Economy

Statism

Government owns major inefficient industry &

redistributes little welfare (French monarchy)

Socialism

Government owns industry but redistributes extensive wealth (Soviet Union; Mao Zedong’s

China)

Rey Ty

Political Economy1. In reality, governments

combine different models.

2. e.g. U.S. is capitalist, laissez-faire, but has welfare (social security)

Rey Ty© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved

Rey Ty

Reference:•Michael G. Roskin, Robert L. Cord, James A. Medeiros, & Walter S. Jones. (2012). Political Science: An Introduction. New York: Pearson Longman.

Fair Use• In good faith, this work contains fair use of copyrighted

and non-copyrighted images from the public domain & the web for non-commercial & nonprofit educational purposes.

• This work is distributed free of charge.

• The author has neither monetized this work nor sought any profit from its distribution.

• Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976: Allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

• This work contains original work of commentary and critical analysis.

• Quotations are attributed to the original authors and sources.

StatesRey Ty