rhetorical moves in the results/discussion/conclusions of a sample research article

Upload: kim-sydow-campbell

Post on 12-Oct-2015

1.000 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

This table maps rhetorical moves onto the text of a sample research article discussed at ProsWrite.com.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1ThistableappearsinadiscussionofResultsandDiscussionplusConclusionsectionsinresearcharticlesonProsWrite.com.

    RhetoricalMove1 Step TextfromSampleRA(Campbelletal.,2007)

    Move1 Preparingthescene Providebackgroundabouttheory/researchaims/methods

    Toillustratehowrapportmanagementcanhelpusdeveloppropositionsabouttheorganizationaljusticenormsthatmaybeviolatedbymanagerswheninteractingwithsubordinates,wetakeacloselookatrepresentativenarrativesintheremainderofthissectionofthearticle.

    Move2 Reportingtheresults PresentfindingsIn9(8%)ofthe108narratives,likethefollowingone,wefoundviolationsofsocialidentityfacewants:

    Narrative148:AtimewhenIfeelangryatworkismoreorlesseveryday.Theheadofmydepartmentthatironicallyknows

    Move3 Commentingonresults

    Step1A InterpretfindingsOnceagain,weseethatalthoughcriticizingsubordinateperformancemaybeanecessaryevil,thewayinwhichmanagerscommunicatethatcriticismiskeytounderstandinginterpersonalinjustice.

    Step1B RefertopreviousresearchThemanagersinappropriateremarksaboutwomenpromotetheperceptionofinterpersonalinjusticerelatedtopropriety(Bies&Moag,1986).

    Step2 CommentonexpectedorunexpectedfindingInterestingly,wefoundthatfiveoftheidentifiedsocialidentityfacewantsviolations(morethanhalf)cooccurredwithviolationsofqualityfacewants

    Step3A EvaluatefindingsDespiteourinabilitytodrawdefinitiveconclusionsabouttherelationshipbetweenrapportmanagementissuesandcategoriesofjustice,codersdididentifybothinjusticeandrapportmanagementviolationsin108(99%)ofthe109narrativesinvolvingasubordinatesangertowardamanager.

    Step3B AccountforfindingsfollowingProposition1alinkingthreatstoqualityfacewantstointerpersonalinjustice,wewouldliketoconcludethatinterpersonalinjusticeisalwayslinkedtofacethreats.However,afewnarrativeswerecodedpositivelyforinterpersonalinjusticeandnegativelyforthreats

    Move4 Summarizingresults Providesummaryweattemptedtodemonstratethevalueofrapportmanagementtheoryforexplicatingtherelationshipmaintenancebehaviorsthatarecrucialintheeffectiveperformanceofnecessaryevils(Molinsky&Margolis,2005).Bylinkingrapportmanagementandorganizationaljusticetheory,weadvancedeightpropositions

    Move5 Evaluatingthestudy

    Step1A DescribelimitationsThereareseverallimitationstotheresearchwehavereportedinthisarticle.First,thenarrativesareretrospectiveaccountsofinteractionsbetweenthenarratorandhisorhermanager.

    Step1B ClaimcontributionofstudyWehopereaderswillagreethatrapportmanagementbehaviorappropriatelydescribestheinterpersonalnormsmanagersmuststrivetoupholdtoperformtheirorganizationalroleeffectivelywiththeirsubordinates.

    Move6Makingdeductionsfromthestudy

    RecommendfutureresearchdirectionsProposition1a:Managerswhothreatenasubordinatesqualityfacewantswillincreasesubordinateperceptionsofinterpersonalinjustice.