#rheumjc: impact of invited authors on a twi;er based ...rheumjc.com/acr16-poster.pdf · twi%er is...

1
Twi%er is a social networking and microblogging service and has become an increasingly popular pla9orm for discussion and engagement amongst healthcare professionals 1,2 . #RheumJC is a Twi%er-based internaDonal rheumatology journal club which occurs approximately once a month 3 . One novel aspect of #RheumJC has been to include principal authors of the discussed manuscripts. Here we describe parDcipant analysis and survey results from the past 18 months of this iniDaDve with a focus on how the presence of authors has impacted the journal club and parDcipants. Background/Purpose #RheumJC: Impact of Invited Authors on a Twi;er Based Rheumatology Journal Club Isabelle Amigues 1 , Paul SuOa 2 , Suleman Bhana 3 , Jose Campos 4 and Christopher Collins 5 1 Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 2 HealthPartners, Saint Paul, MN, 3 Crystal Run Healthcare, Middletown, NY, 4 Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, 5 MedStar Washington Hospital Center/ Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC A #RheumJC development team was created to help define the structure and moderate the online discussions. A twi%er account (@RheumJC), a companion website (h%p://rheumjc.com ) and a #RheumJC mailing list were created. All manuscripts discussed were made available online for free by respecDve journals for anywhere from 48 hours to one week prior to each session. Prior to each journal club, principal authors of the selected manuscripts were invited to parDcipate. A total of 13 different online journal clubs were conducted between January 29 th , 2015 and October 27 th , 2016, each consisDng of two “live” one hour chats, as well as a full 24 hrs to allow for asynchronous parDcipaDon. In 6 of the 13 journal clubs, principal authors of the chosen manuscripts parDcipated in at least one of the two live sessions which were held for each journal club. An analysis of all the sessions was performed to assess parDcipant demographics and parDcipaDon rates (individual live sessions as well as the enDre 20 month observaDon period). Numbers of parDcipants and tweet volume were analyzed between those sessions with and without an author present: differences were calculated using unpaired t-test. A follow up survey was conducted aier the 10 th journal club to both #RheumJC parDcipants as well as the invited authors to assess metrics of saDsfacDon and idenDfy addiDonal strengths or barriers. Methods Results Effect of Author Par:cipa:on Mean # of Tweets per Journal Club ParDcipants per one hour live Journal Club session Mean # of ParDcipants per one hour live Journal Club session 37 individuals from 12 different countries responded to a follow up survey and indicated they had parDcipated or followed along in at least one journal club session. 53 % of respondents had parDcipated in at least 3 or more sessions (Figure 3). 35% of parDcipants stated that they had incorporated knowledge from one of the sessions into their clinical pracDce (Figure 4). Examples were given. When asked which sessions resulted in pracDce changes, 71% of the responses highlighted sessions where authors were available as discussants. Survey Results p = 0.007 p = 0.001 #RheumJC is a novel and popular approach to the tradiDonal medical journal club. The involvement of manuscript authors has proven to be a parDcularly well received aspect of this iniDaDve. The inclusion of authors in the discussion increases user engagement and possibly can influence pracDce decision making by journal club parDcipants. We encourage authors to parDcipate in this novel educaDonal acDvity to potenDally broaden the impact of their research. Conclusions Sample Comments “I have considered using varicella tests in some of my GCA paDents. Also, more willing to use Cellcept for scleroderma lung.” “Aier the paper on Varicella Zoster virus (VZV) & GCA I have changed my view on corDcoids + anDviral therapy” “Cited an arDcle covered when discussing benlysta treat with a pt.” “I have considered using anDviral against VZV for GCA aier a discussion with the first author of a paper discussed on #RheumJC. I didn't have to as my paDent got be%er. But I am keeping it as a potenDal tool in the near future.” A survey of the invited authors revealed that they found their experience very rewarding and all of them indicated that they would be highly likely to parDcipate again. References 1. JalaliA, SherbinoJ, Frank J, Sutherland S. Social media and medical educaDon: Exploring the potenDal of Twi%er as a learning tool. IntRev Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;27(2):140-6. 2. ReamesBN, SheetzKH, EnglesbeMJ, Waits SA. EvaluaDng the Use of Twi%er to Enhance the EducaDonal Experience of a Medical School Surgery Clerkship. J SurgEduc. 2015 Sep 20. pii: S1931-7204(15)00214-7 3. Collins CE, SuOa P, Hausmann JS, JayaDlleke A, Campos J, Bhana S. #RheumJC: Development, ImplementaDon and Analysis of an InternaDonal Twi%er-Based Rheumatology Journal Club. ArthriDs and Rheum. 2015; 67 (suppl 10) Acknowledgements We would like to thank BMJ, Wiley, FronDers, Lippinco% Williams & Wilkins, and NEJM publishing groups for allowing temporary open access to chosen journal arDcles. Also, thanks to all the parDcipants in #RheumJC Figure 1: Expansion of RheumJC mailing list followers Since the inaugural session of #RheumJC in January, 2015: 440 unique individuals/ accounts have tweeted with the hashtag #RhemJC (a measure of individual parDcipaDon). ParDcipant accounts idenDfied to 36 different countries (Figure 2). 5,365 tweets with the hashtag #RheumJC 6,675,915 impressions (a measure of exposure - the total number of Dmes tweets about #RheumJC were delivered to Twi%er streams) @RheumJC twi%er account followed by 1627 individuals/ accounts RheumJC mailing list followed by 195 accounts with consistent growth since its incepDon (Figure 1). Background/Purpose: Twi%er is an increasingly popular pla9orm for discussion and engagement among healthcare professionals. #RheumJC is a Twi%er-based internaDonal rheumatology journal club which occurs approximately once a month. One novel aspect of #RheumJC has been to include principal authors of the discussed manuscripts, whenever possible. Here we describe parDcipant analysis and survey results from the past 18 months of this iniDaDve with a focus on how the presence of authors has impacted the journal club and parDcipants. Methods: A #RheumJC development team was created to help define the structure and moderate the online discussions. Prior to each journal club, principal authors of the selected manuscripts were invited to parDcipate. A total of 10 different online journal clubs were conducted between January 29 th , 2015 and June 2 nd , 2016, each consisDng of two “live” one hour chats, as well as a full 24 hrs to allow for asynchronous parDcipaDon. In 4 of the 10 journal clubs, principal authors of the chosen manuscripts parDcipated in the online discussion. An analysis of all the sessions was performed to assess parDcipant demographics and parDcipaDon rates. A follow up survey was conducted aier the 10 th journal club to both #RheumJC parDcipants as well as the invited authors to assess metrics of saDsfacDon and idenDfy addiDonal strengths or barriers. Results: In total, 433 individuals from 36 different countries parDcipated in at least one #RheumJC session. For the 4 journal clubs during which principal authors were present, compared to sessions without an author present, there were a significantly greater number of parDcipants (46 ± 11.5 vs 26 ± 13.3 respecDvely, p=0.039) and tweets (462 ± 103.5 vs 306 ± 111.0, p=0.048) suggesDng the presence of principal authors was a popular feature. 35 individuals from 11 different countries responded to a survey and indicated they had parDcipated or followed along in at least one journal club session. The majority (88%) indicated they were either saDsfied or very saDsfied with the #RheumJC iniDaDve. AddiDonally, 37.5% of respondents indicated that their parDcipaDon in #RheumJC had influenced pracDce decision making. When asked which sessions resulted in pracDce changes, 71% of the responses highlighted sessions where authors were available as discussants. Of interest, 7% of respondents indicated they had joined Twi%er solely because of #RheumJC, and another 37% stated that #RheumJC had increased their use of Twi%er as a tool for medical educaDon. A survey of the invited authors revealed that they found their experience very rewarding and all of them indicated that they would be highly likely to parDcipate again. Conclusion: #RheumJC is a novel and popular approach to the tradiDonal medical journal club. The involvement of manuscript authors has proven to be a parDcularly well received aspect of this iniDaDve. The inclusion of authors in the discussion increases user engagement and possibly can influence pracDce decision making by journal club parDcipants. We encourage authors to parDcipate in this novel educaDonal acDvity to potenDally broaden the impact of their research. Abstract #1145 26 live Journal Clubs sessions (13 total unique Journal Clubs) 10 live Journal Club sessions with author parDcipaDon Individual manuscripts and parDcipaDon rates are listed in table 1 Mean number of parDcipants in sessions with an author present was 17 (SD±3.6), and without an author was 10.75 (SD±6.1), p=0.007 Mean number of tweets in sessions with an author present was 184 (SD±32.6), and without an author was 122 (SD±46.4), p=0.001 0 5 10 15 20 25 Author Present No Author 0 50 100 150 200 250 Author Present No Author Date ArGcle Session ParGcipants tweets 1/25/2015 Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofeDl for inducDon therapy of lupus nephriDs: a randomised controlled trial and long-term follow-up – Mok CC, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan JC1a 21 188 JC1b 25 195 3/3/2015 Rituximab for the treatment of relapses in anDneutrophil cytoplasmic anDbody-associated vasculiDs – Miloslavsky EM, et al. ArthriDs Rheumatol. 2014 Nov JC2a 23 182 JC2b 17 240 4/2/2015 Proceedings from the American College of Rheumatology ReproducDve Health Summit: the management of ferDlity, pregnancy, and lactaDon in women with autoimmune and systemic inflammatory diseases – Kavanaugh A, Cush JJ,et al. ArthriDs Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Mar JC3a 22 208 JC3b 13 211 5/7/2015 Disease acDvity guided dose reducDon and withdrawal of adalimumab or etanercept compared with usual care in rheumatoid arthriDs – van Herwaarden N, et al. BMJ. 2015 Apr 9 JC4a 12 129 JC4b 15 224 7/23/2015 A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in paDents with acDve rheumatoid arthriDs despite methotrexate therapy – Emery P, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jul 6 JC5a 17 165 JC5b 13 158 1/28/2016 Response to belimumab among paDents with systemic lupus erythematosus in clinical pracDce seyngs: 24-month results from the OBSErve study in the USA – Collins CE, et al. Lupus Sci Med. 2016 Jan 11 JC6a 18 135 JC6b 14 139 2/25/2016 Prevalence and distribuDon of VZV in temporal arteries of paDents with giant cell arteriDs – Lavi E, Gilden D, Nagel M, White T, Grose C. Neurology. 2015 Nov 24 JC7a 17 201 JC7b 16 182 3/31/2016 Hand to Mouth: A SystemaDc Review and Meta-Analysis of the AssociaDon between Rheumatoid ArthriDs and PeriodonDDs – Fuggle, NR, et al. Front Immunol. 2016 Mar 2 JC8a 7 72 JC8b 8 118 5/5/2016 Secukinumab InhibiDon of Interleukin-17A in PaDents with PsoriaDc ArthriDs – Mease PJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct JC9a 10 97 JC9b 6 97 6/2/2016 Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in adults with systemic sclerosis (faSScinate): a phase 2, randomised, controlled trial – Khanna D, et al. Lancet. 2016 Jun 25 JC10a 8 76 JC10b 6 94 6/30/2016 Rheumatoid arthriDs: Missed opportuniDes in the 2015 ACR guideline for RA treatment - van Vollenhoven. Nat Rev Rheum. 2016 Jan 14 JC11a 8 106 JC11b 7 134 9/29/2016 Inflammatory arthriDs and sicca syndrome induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab - Cappelli LC, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016, Jun 15 JC12a 12 167 JC12b 5 67 10/27/2016 Non–TNF-Targeted Biologic vs a Second AnD-TNF Drug to Treat Rheumatoid ArthriDs in PaDents With Insufficient Response to a First AnD-TNF Drug; A Randomized Clinical Trial - Go%enberg JE, et al. JAMA, 2016 Sept 20 JC13a 18 175 JC13b 4 104 Figure 2: Map of locaDon of #RheumJC parDcipants Table 1: List of manuscripts. Shaded rows indicate author parDcipated in the live discussion Figure 3 Figure 4 During the live sessions, 41% of the survey respondents indicated that they have observed only and not parDcipated in the conversaDon (Figure 5), suggesDng that the recorded number of #RheumJC parDcipants may be an underesDmaDon of the actual number of individuals following the chats. Figure 5

Upload: doankhanh

Post on 06-Feb-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: #RheumJC: Impact of Invited Authors on a Twi;er Based ...rheumjc.com/acr16-poster.pdf · Twi%er is a social networking and microblogging ... Impact of Invited Authors on a Twi;er

Twi%erisasocialnetworkingandmicrobloggingserviceandhasbecomeanincreasinglypopular pla9orm for discussion and engagement amongst healthcare professionals1,2.#RheumJC is a Twi%er-based internaDonal rheumatology journal club which occursapproximately once a month3. One novel aspect of #RheumJC has been to includeprincipalauthorsofthediscussedmanuscripts.HerewedescribeparDcipantanalysisandsurveyresultsfromthepast18monthsofthisiniDaDvewithafocusonhowthepresenceofauthorshasimpactedthejournalclubandparDcipants.

Background/Purpose

#RheumJC:ImpactofInvitedAuthorsonaTwi;erBasedRheumatologyJournalClub

IsabelleAmigues1,PaulSuOa2,SulemanBhana3,JoseCampos4andChristopherCollins5

1ColumbiaUniversity,CollegeofPhysicians&Surgeons,NewYork,NY,2HealthPartners,SaintPaul,MN,3CrystalRunHealthcare,Middletown,NY,4HospitalUniversitarioPuertadeHierroMajadahonda,Madrid,Spain,5MedStarWashingtonHospitalCenter/GeorgetownUniversityMedicalCenter,Washington,DC

•  A #RheumJC development team was created to help define the structure andmoderatetheonlinediscussions.

•  A twi%er account (@RheumJC), a companion website (h%p://rheumjc.com) and a#RheumJCmailinglistwerecreated.

•  Allmanuscriptsdiscussedweremadeavailableonline for freeby respecDve journalsforanywherefrom48hourstooneweekpriortoeachsession.

•  Priortoeachjournalclub,principalauthorsoftheselectedmanuscriptswere invitedtoparDcipate.

•  Atotalof13differentonlinejournalclubswereconductedbetweenJanuary29th,2015andOctober27th,2016,eachconsisDngoftwo“live”onehourchats,aswellasafull24hrstoallowforasynchronousparDcipaDon.

•  In6ofthe13journalclubs,principalauthorsofthechosenmanuscriptsparDcipatedinatleastoneofthetwolivesessionswhichwereheldforeachjournalclub.

•  AnanalysisofallthesessionswasperformedtoassessparDcipantdemographicsandparDcipaDonrates(individuallivesessionsaswellastheenDre20monthobservaDonperiod).

•  Numbers of parDcipants and tweet volume were analyzed between those sessionswithandwithoutanauthorpresent:differenceswerecalculatedusingunpairedt-test.

•  A follow up survey was conducted aier the 10th journal club to both #RheumJCparDcipantsaswellastheinvitedauthorstoassessmetricsofsaDsfacDonandidenDfyaddiDonalstrengthsorbarriers.

Methods

Results

EffectofAuthorPar:cipa:onMean#ofTweetsperJournalClubParDcipantsperonehour

liveJournalClubsessionMean#ofParDcipantsperonehourliveJournalClubsession

•  37individualsfrom12differentcountriesrespondedtoafollowupsurveyandindicatedtheyhadparDcipatedorfollowedalonginatleastonejournalclubsession.

•  53%ofrespondentshadparDcipatedinatleast3ormoresessions(Figure3).

•  35%ofparDcipantsstatedthattheyhadincorporatedknowledgefromoneofthesessionsintotheirclinicalpracDce(Figure4).Examplesweregiven.

•  WhenaskedwhichsessionsresultedinpracDcechanges,71%oftheresponseshighlightedsessionswhereauthorswereavailableasdiscussants.

SurveyResults

p=0.007 p=0.001

#RheumJC isanovelandpopularapproach to the tradiDonalmedical journal club.TheinvolvementofmanuscriptauthorshasproventobeaparDcularlywellreceivedaspectofthis iniDaDve.Theinclusionofauthors inthediscussionincreasesuserengagementandpossibly can influence pracDce decision making by journal club parDcipants. WeencourageauthorstoparDcipateinthisnoveleducaDonalacDvitytopotenDallybroadentheimpactoftheirresearch.

Conclusions

SampleComments•  “IhaveconsideredusingvaricellatestsinsomeofmyGCApaDents.Also,morewillingtouseCellceptforsclerodermalung.”•  “AierthepaperonVaricellaZostervirus(VZV)&GCAIhavechangedmyviewoncorDcoids+anDviraltherapy”•  “CitedanarDclecoveredwhendiscussingbenlystatreatwithapt.”•  “IhaveconsideredusinganDviralagainstVZVforGCAaieradiscussionwiththefirstauthorofapaperdiscussedon#RheumJC.Ididn'thavetoasmypaDentgotbe%er.ButIamkeepingitasapotenDaltoolinthenearfuture.”

•  AsurveyoftheinvitedauthorsrevealedthattheyfoundtheirexperienceveryrewardingandallofthemindicatedthattheywouldbehighlylikelytoparDcipateagain.

References

1.  JalaliA,SherbinoJ,FrankJ,SutherlandS.SocialmediaandmedicaleducaDon:ExploringthepotenDalofTwi%erasalearningtool.IntRevPsychiatry.2015Apr;27(2):140-6.

2.  ReamesBN,SheetzKH,EnglesbeMJ,WaitsSA.EvaluaDngtheUseofTwi%ertoEnhancetheEducaDonalExperienceofaMedicalSchoolSurgeryClerkship.JSurgEduc.2015Sep20.pii:S1931-7204(15)00214-7

3.  CollinsCE,SuOaP,HausmannJS,JayaDllekeA,CamposJ,BhanaS.#RheumJC:Development,ImplementaDonandAnalysisofanInternaDonalTwi%er-BasedRheumatologyJournalClub.ArthriDsandRheum.2015;67(suppl10)

Acknowledgements

WewouldliketothankBMJ,Wiley,FronDers,Lippinco%Williams&Wilkins,andNEJMpublishinggroupsforallowingtemporaryopenaccesstochosenjournalarDcles.Also,thankstoalltheparDcipantsin#RheumJC

Figure1:ExpansionofRheumJCmailinglistfollowers

•  Sincetheinauguralsessionof#RheumJCinJanuary,2015:•  440uniqueindividuals/accountshavetweetedwiththehashtag

#RhemJC(ameasureofindividualparDcipaDon).•  ParDcipantaccountsidenDfiedto36differentcountries(Figure2).•  5,365tweetswiththehashtag#RheumJC•  6,675,915impressions(ameasureofexposure-thetotalnumber

ofDmestweetsabout#RheumJCweredeliveredtoTwi%erstreams)

•  @RheumJCtwi%eraccountfollowedby1627individuals/accounts•  RheumJCmailinglistfollowedby195accountswithconsistent

growthsinceitsincepDon(Figure1).

Background/Purpose: Twi%er is an increasingly popular pla9orm for discussion and engagement amonghealthcare professionals. #RheumJC is a Twi%er-based internaDonal rheumatology journal clubwhich occursapproximately once a month. One novel aspect of #RheumJC has been to include principal authors of thediscussedmanuscripts,wheneverpossible.HerewedescribeparDcipantanalysisand survey results fromthepast18monthsofthisiniDaDvewithafocusonhowthepresenceofauthorshasimpactedthejournalclubandparDcipants.

Methods: A#RheumJCdevelopmentteamwascreatedtohelpdefinethestructureandmoderatetheonlinediscussions.Priortoeachjournalclub,principalauthorsoftheselectedmanuscriptswereinvitedtoparDcipate.Atotalof10differentonlinejournalclubswereconductedbetweenJanuary29th,2015andJune2nd,2016,eachconsisDngoftwo“live”onehourchats,aswellasafull24hrstoallowforasynchronousparDcipaDon.In4ofthe 10 journal clubs, principal authors of the chosen manuscripts parDcipated in the online discussion. AnanalysisofallthesessionswasperformedtoassessparDcipantdemographicsandparDcipaDonrates.Afollowupsurveywasconductedaierthe10thjournalclubtoboth#RheumJCparDcipantsaswellastheinvitedauthorstoassessmetricsofsaDsfacDonandidenDfyaddiDonalstrengthsorbarriers.

Results: Intotal,433individualsfrom36differentcountriesparDcipatedinatleastone#RheumJCsession.Forthe 4 journal clubs during which principal authors were present, compared to sessions without an authorpresent,therewereasignificantlygreaternumberofparDcipants(46±11.5vs26±13.3respecDvely,p=0.039)andtweets(462±103.5vs306±111.0,p=0.048)suggesDngthepresenceofprincipalauthorswasapopularfeature.35individualsfrom11differentcountriesrespondedtoasurveyandindicatedtheyhadparDcipatedorfollowedalong inat leastone journalclubsession.Themajority (88%) indicatedtheywereeithersaDsfiedorverysaDsfiedwiththe#RheumJCiniDaDve.AddiDonally,37.5%ofrespondentsindicatedthattheirparDcipaDonin#RheumJChadinfluencedpracDcedecisionmaking.WhenaskedwhichsessionsresultedinpracDcechanges,71% of the responses highlighted sessions where authors were available as discussants. Of interest, 7% ofrespondents indicated they had joined Twi%er solely because of #RheumJC, and another 37% stated that#RheumJChad increasedtheiruseofTwi%erasa tool formedicaleducaDon.Asurveyof the invitedauthorsrevealedthattheyfoundtheirexperienceveryrewardingandallofthemindicatedthattheywouldbehighlylikelytoparDcipateagain.

Conclusion:#RheumJCisanovelandpopularapproachtothetradiDonalmedicaljournalclub.Theinvolvementofmanuscript authors has proven tobe a parDcularlywell received aspect of this iniDaDve. The inclusionofauthors in the discussion increases user engagement and possibly can influence pracDce decisionmaking byjournalclubparDcipants.WeencourageauthorstoparDcipate inthisnoveleducaDonalacDvitytopotenDallybroadentheimpactoftheirresearch.

Abstract#1145

•  26liveJournalClubssessions(13totaluniqueJournalClubs)•  10liveJournalClubsessionswithauthorparDcipaDon•  IndividualmanuscriptsandparDcipaDonratesarelistedintable1

•  MeannumberofparDcipantsinsessionswithanauthorpresentwas17(SD±3.6),andwithoutanauthorwas10.75(SD±6.1),p=0.007

•  Meannumberoftweetsinsessionswithanauthorpresentwas184(SD±32.6),andwithoutanauthorwas122(SD±46.4),p=0.001

0

5

10

15

20

25

AuthorPresent NoAuthor0

50

100

150

200

250

AuthorPresent NoAuthor

Date ArGcle Session ParGcipants tweets

1/25/2015 TacrolimusversusmycophenolatemofeDlforinducDontherapyoflupusnephriDs:arandomisedcontrolledtrialandlong-termfollow-up–MokCC,etal.AnnRheumDis.2016Jan

JC1a 21 188JC1b 25 195

3/3/2015 RituximabforthetreatmentofrelapsesinanDneutrophilcytoplasmicanDbody-associatedvasculiDs–MiloslavskyEM,etal.ArthriDsRheumatol.2014Nov

JC2a 23 182JC2b 17 240

4/2/2015 ProceedingsfromtheAmericanCollegeofRheumatologyReproducDveHealthSummit:themanagementofferDlity,pregnancy,andlactaDoninwomenwithautoimmuneandsystemicinflammatorydiseases–KavanaughA,CushJJ,etal.ArthriDsCareRes(Hoboken).2015Mar

JC3a 22 208

JC3b 13 211

5/7/2015 DiseaseacDvityguideddosereducDonandwithdrawalofadalimumaboretanerceptcomparedwithusualcareinrheumatoidarthriDs–vanHerwaardenN,etal.BMJ.2015Apr9

JC4a 12 129JC4b 15 224

7/23/2015 AphaseIIIrandomised,double-blind,parallel-groupstudycomparingSB4withetanerceptreferenceproductinpaDentswithacDverheumatoidarthriDsdespitemethotrexatetherapy–EmeryP,etal.AnnRheumDis.2015Jul6

JC5a 17 165JC5b 13 158

1/28/2016 ResponsetobelimumabamongpaDentswithsystemiclupuserythematosusinclinicalpracDceseyngs:24-monthresultsfromtheOBSErvestudyintheUSA–CollinsCE,etal.LupusSciMed.2016Jan11

JC6a 18 135JC6b 14 139

2/25/2016 PrevalenceanddistribuDonofVZVintemporalarteriesofpaDentswithgiantcellarteriDs–LaviE,GildenD,NagelM,WhiteT,GroseC.Neurology.2015Nov24

JC7a 17 201JC7b 16 182

3/31/2016 HandtoMouth:ASystemaDcReviewandMeta-AnalysisoftheAssociaDonbetweenRheumatoidArthriDsandPeriodonDDs–Fuggle,NR,etal.FrontImmunol.2016Mar2

JC8a 7 72JC8b 8 118

5/5/2016 SecukinumabInhibiDonofInterleukin-17AinPaDentswithPsoriaDcArthriDs–MeasePJ,etal.NEnglJMed.2015Oct JC9a 10 97JC9b 6 97

6/2/2016 Safetyandefficacyofsubcutaneoustocilizumabinadultswithsystemicsclerosis(faSScinate):aphase2,randomised,controlledtrial–KhannaD,etal.Lancet.2016Jun25

JC10a 8 76JC10b 6 94

6/30/2016 RheumatoidarthriDs:MissedopportuniDesinthe2015ACRguidelineforRAtreatment-vanVollenhoven.NatRevRheum.2016Jan14 JC11a 8 106JC11b 7 134

9/29/2016 InflammatoryarthriDsandsiccasyndromeinducedbynivolumabandipilimumab-CappelliLC,etal.AnnRheumDis.2016,Jun15 JC12a 12 167JC12b 5 67

10/27/2016 Non–TNF-TargetedBiologicvsaSecondAnD-TNFDrugtoTreatRheumatoidArthriDsinPaDentsWithInsufficientResponsetoaFirstAnD-TNFDrug;ARandomizedClinicalTrial-Go%enbergJE,etal.JAMA,2016Sept20

JC13a 18 175JC13b 4 104

Figure2:MapoflocaDonof#RheumJCparDcipants

Table1:Listofmanuscripts.ShadedrowsindicateauthorparDcipatedinthelivediscussion

Figure3

Figure4

•  Duringthelivesessions,41%ofthesurveyrespondentsindicatedthattheyhaveobservedonlyandnotparDcipatedintheconversaDon(Figure5),suggesDngthattherecordednumberof#RheumJCparDcipantsmaybeanunderesDmaDonoftheactualnumberofindividualsfollowingthechats.

Figure5