ricardo silva

11

Click here to load reader

Upload: eccsymposium

Post on 13-Jan-2015

586 views

Category:

Business


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ricardo silva

Limited Liability Partnership

7404 N. Spalding Avenue Fresno, California 93720-3370 Tel 559-431-5600 Fax 559-261-9366

2701 Old Eureka Way, Suite 2F, Redding, California 96001 Tel 530-243-8150 Fax 530-243-1745

4 Lower Ragsdale Drive, Suite 200 Monterey, California 93940-5758 Tel 831-646-1501 Fax 831-646-1801

140 2nd Street, Suite 250, Petaluma, California 94952 Tel 707-762-1005 Fax 707-762-1091

515 South Figueroa Street, Suite 750 Los Angeles, California 90071 Tel 213-929-1066 Fax 213-929-1077

2001 North Main Street, Suite 650 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Tel 925-953-1620 Fax 925-953-1625

One Capitol Mall, Suite 640 Sacramento, California 95814 Tel 916-329-7433 Fax 916-329-9050

9444 Waples Street, Suite 285, San Diego, California 92121 Tel 858-909-9002 Fax 858-909-9022

ACSA Every Child Counts Symposium

Understanding the Art and Science of Mediating Special Education Disputes

January 16, 2014

Presented by

Ricardo Silva, Esq.

and Beth Nishida

Page 2: Ricardo silva

1

Understanding the Art and Science of Mediating Special Education Disputes

ACSA Conference ~ Monterey California

Presented by:Ricardo Silva, Esq. and Beth Nishida

January 16, 2014

2

Mediating Special Education Disputes

Beth Nishida

Special Education Director

Hacienda La Puente Unified School District

Ricardo Silva

Partner Lozano Smith

San Diego Office

3

Overview

• IDEA and Resolution

• Defensibility

• FAPE (overview)

• Relationships

• Settlement

Page 3: Ricardo silva

2

4

IDEA and Resolution

“Parents and Schools should be given expanded opportunities to resolve their disagreements in positive and constructive ways.”

20 U.S.C. § 1400(c)(8)

5

IDEA and Resolution

2004 Amendments Added

• Early Resolution – Requires Parent Participation

“Congress has repeatedly amended the Act in order to reduce its administrative and litigation costs.”Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U.S. 49, 57(2005).

6

Number of Filings -Fiscal Year 2012-2013

• Student 2,727

• District 467

• Total 3,194

Page 4: Ricardo silva

3

7

Outcomes – First Quarter

Total Cases Filed 911

Reasons for Closure• Decisions Issued 19• Settled at Resolution

Session 20• Settled at Mediation 360• Settled Outside Mediation

or Resolution Session 303• Withdrawn 110

8

Prevailing Party Status –First Quarter

• Student Prevailed: 5

• District Prevailed: 7

• Split: 7

9

FAPE and Defensibility

• FAPE should lead to a defensible program

• FAPE is always the GOAL!

Page 5: Ricardo silva

4

10

Reasons for settlement:

• Not Defensible

• Witnesses

• Costs

• Heat

11

Reasons for settlement:

• Finality

• Certainty

• Minimize risk

• Reduce fees

• Avoid hearing

• Strategy

12

Reasons for settlement:

• Defensible program

• Witnesses

• Costs

• Heat

Page 6: Ricardo silva

5

13

Taking stock of your case

What do you look for?

• Defensible

• Staff

– How will the staff handle a due process hearing?

– Will they make good witnesses?

– Are they all appropriately qualified or credentialed?

14

When in Due Process

When you are in a due process hearing, how do you use the process to your advantage ?

15

The Process

• Early Resolution Session

• Mediation (OAH)

• Private Mediation

• Hearing

Page 7: Ricardo silva

6

16

Strategies for Negotiating Special Education Disputes

• Prepare, prepare, prepare

• Cooperation: once in negotiations, the goal is joint-problem solving

• Identify barriers to cooperation

*Adapted from Getting Past No, by William Ury

17

Strategies for Negotiating Special Education Disputes

• Identify Barriers

–Reactions

–Emotions

–Positions

–Dissatisfaction

–Perception of Power

*Adapted from Getting Past No, by William Ury

18

Strategies for Negotiating Special Education Disputes

• Breakthrough barriers

–Mile-high view

–Step to their side

–Reframe

–Build a golden bridge

–User power to educate

*Adapted from Getting Past No, by William Ury

Page 8: Ricardo silva

7

19

Personal Relationships

• Parents want to feel that someone is listening to them

• Probability that they will give you an opportunity to resolve dispute before filing for due process, rather than being blind-sided

20

Relationship Builders

• Listen

• Don’t react

• Don’t judge

• Partner

• Problem Solve

21

Relationship Wreckers

• Failing to Listen

• Reacting

• Judgmental

• Predetermine or dictate outcome

Page 9: Ricardo silva

8

22

ADR and Relationships

• Relationships are critical

• Should be built before a dispute

• Also during the ADR process

23

Important distinction

FAPE vs. Settlement offer:

At an IEP team meeting you DO NOT compromise your FAPE offer!

24

Settlement, What is the benefit of your bargain?

• What do you get in exchange; are you buying peace?

• Don’t let it be stay-put: Ensure that services have an end-date and identify the replacement services

Page 10: Ricardo silva

9

25

Settlement is an opportunity

• Opportunity for data collection

• The data collected during the settlement period may support your argument why it is not FAPE

26

Understanding the Settlement Agreement

• Implement: Make sure staff understand the relevant portions of a settlement agreement

• Inform: Make sure staff understand what you are trying to accomplish with the settlement

27

Final Thoughts for Today

Ensure IEP offers FAPE

• Relationships are important

• Understand the process

• Understand the opportunity

Page 11: Ricardo silva

10

28

Please Note:

THE LEGAL STUFF

These materials and all discussions of these materials are for instructional purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice, you should contact your local counsel or an attorney at Lozano Smith. If you are interested in having other in-service programs presented, please contact [email protected] or call (559) 431-5600.

29

• All rights reserved. No portion of this work may be copied, or sold or used for any commercial advantage or private gain, nor any derivative work prepared there from, without the express prior written permission of Lozano Smith through its Managing Partner. The Managing Partner of Lozano Smith hereby grants permission to any client of Lozano Smith to whom Lozano Smith provides a copy to use such copy intact and solely for the internal purposes of such client.

• © 2013 Lozano Smith