richland county planning commissionrichlandcountysc.gov/portals/0/departments... · 6/4/2018  ·...

42
RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION June 4, 2018 Council Chambers 2020 Hampton Street Columbia, SC 29202

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

RICHLAND COUNTY

PLANNING COMMISSION

June 4, 2018

Council Chambers

2020 Hampton Street

Columbia, SC 29202

Page 2: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020
Page 3: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

Monday, June 4, 2018 Agenda 3:00 PM

2020 Hampton Street 2nd Floor, Council Chambers

Chairman – Stephen Gilchrist

Vice Chairman – Heather Cairns

Beverly Frierson • Mettauer Carlisle • Prentiss McLaurin David Tuttle • Wallace Brown • Ed Greenleaf • Karen Yip

I. PUBLIC MEETING CALL TO ORDER ................................................... Stephen Gilchrist, Chairman

II. PUBLIC NOTICE ANNOUNCEMENT .................................................... Stephen Gilchrist, Chairman

III. CONSENT AGENDA [ACTION]

a. PRESENTATION OF MINUTES FOR APPROVAL – April 2018 & May 2018

b. ROAD NAMES

c. MAP AMENDMENTS [ACTION]

1. Case # 18-019 MA Mohammad Tabassum RU to NC (1.7 acres) 7125 Monticello Road TMS# R07600-02-25 PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1

District 4 Paul Livingston

2. Case # 18-020 MA Robert L. Legette NC to GC (.51 acres) 441 Percival Road TMS# R16712-06-03 PDSD Recommendation - Disapproval Page 9

District 6 Greg Pearce

3. Case # 18-021 MA Christopher Alford CC-4 to CC-2 (2 acre) 7430 Fairfield Road TMS# R11904-02-05 PDSD Recommendation - Disapproval Page 17

District 7 Gwendolyn Kennery

Page 4: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

4. Case # 18-022 MA Scott Morrison RU to RS-E (10.81 acres) 204 Langford Road TMS# R15200-05-02 (Portion of) PDSD Recommendation - Approval Page 25

District 2 Joyce Dickerson

IV. OTHER ITEMS [ACTION] 1. Presentation of the Draft Richland County Land Development Design Manual

V. LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REWRITE [ACTION]

VI. CHAIRMAN’S REPORT

VII. PLANNING DIRECTOR’S REPORT

A. Report of Council B. DRT Report

VIII. ADJOURNMENT

NOTES:

MEETING FORMAT

The Planning Commission uses the consent agenda to approve non-controversial or routine matters by a single motion and vote. If a member of the Planning Commission, the Planning Staff or the general public wants to discuss an item on the consent agenda (at the beginning of the meeting), that item is removed from the consent agenda and considered during the meeting. The Planning Commission then approves the remaining consent agenda items. Persons wishing to speak on an agenda item are requested to sign the item’s sign-in sheet located at the back of County Council Chambers. Meeting attendees are usually given two (2) minutes to speak; the time limit is at the discretion of the Chair of the meeting and may be limited when appropriate. Speakers’ comments should be addressed to the full body. Requests to engage a Commission Member, County staff or applicants in conversation will not be honored. Abusive language is inappropriate.

After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and brought back to Commission level for discussion and action. There is no further comment permitted from the audience unless requested by the Commission.

ZONING PUBLIC HEARING The Planning Commission is a recommending body to Richland County Council. Recommendations for “Approval” or “Disapproval” are forwarded to County Council for their consideration at the next Zoning Public Hearing. The Zoning Public Hearing is another opportunity to voice your opinion for or against a rezoning or amendment to the Land Development Code and is open to the public. The County Council Zoning Public Hearing is usually scheduled for the 4th Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. Check the County’s website for dates and times.

Page 5: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2020 Hampton Street ● Columbia, S.C. 29204

(803) 576-2190

“Making the Safety of the Richland County Citizens Our #1 Priority, One Address at a Time”

To: Planning Commission Members, Interested Parties

From: Alfreda W. Tindal, 9-1-1 Addressing Coordinator

Date: May 24, 2018

Subject: Street Name (s) Approval Request

Pursuant Section 6-29-1200(A) SC Code of Laws requires the Planning Commission to approve street names. Specially, states “…A local planning commission created under the provisions of this chapter shall, by proper certificate, approve and authorize the name of a street or road laid out within the territory over which the commission has jurisdiction…”

The proposed street names have been reviewed and incompliance with Richland County & State Statue Road Naming Standards. Action Requested: The Planning Commission Board approval of the following street name(s):

Proposed Street

Name (s)

Applicant/ Contact

Development

Name/Location

Property TMS

#

Council District

(Honorable)

1. Cassiopeia 2. Casting Spoon 3. Cotton Chestnut 4. Falling Leaves 5. Isham 6. Lolliberry 7. Mistletoe 8. Quiet Oak 9. Silver Bluff 10. Smooth water 11. Spincast 12. Stony Mews 13. Tawny Forest 14. Topwater 15. Triggerspin 16. Vervain 17. Wassaw 18. Whisk Fern

Mark Schimmoeller, II LandTech Inc of SC

Proposed Autumn Pond Subdivision

R20500-04-06 Calvin “Chip” Jackson (9)

Page 6: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020
Page 7: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Richland County Planning & Development Services Department

Map Amendment Staff Report

PC MEETING DATE: June 4, 2018 RC PROJECT: 18-019 MA APPLICANT: Mohammad Tabassum LOCATION: 7125 Monticello Road TAX MAP NUMBER: R07600-02-25 ACREAGE: 1.7 acres EXISTING ZONING: RU PROPOSED ZONING: NC PC SIGN POSTING: May 21, 2018 Staff Recommendation

Disapproval Eligibility for Map Amendment Request

Section 26-52. Amendments Minimum area for zoning map amendment application. No request for a change in zoning classification shall be considered that involves an area of less than two (2) acres, except changes that involve one of the following: In accordance with Section 26-52. Amendments (b) (2) b. 4. An addition of NC zoning contiguous to an existing commercial or residential zoning district. Background

Zoning History The original zoning as adopted September 7, 1977 was RU District. The subject parcel previously requested General Commercial (GC) District under case number 18-09 MA. The request was withdrawn by the applicant. Zoning History for the General Area The CC-1, Residential District parcels east of the site were rezoned under case number 10-006MA. Zoning District Summary The NC District is intended to accommodate commercial and service uses oriented primarily to serving the needs of persons who live or work in nearby areas. This district is designed to be located within or adjacent to residential neighborhoods where large commercial uses are inappropriate, but where small neighborhood oriented businesses are useful and desired.

1

Page 8: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

No minimum lot area, except as required by DHEC. The maximum allowed density for residential uses is eight (8) dwelling units per acre. Based upon a gross density calculation, the maximum number of units for this site is approximately: 13 dwelling units*. *In calculating the maximum number of dwelling units, site characteristics, restrictions, land used for installation of infrastructure (which often amounts to 20-30% of the site) are not taken into consideration. Direction Existing Zoning Use

North: RU Undeveloped

South: M-1 Automobile Repair

East: CC-1/CC-1 Residence/Residence

West: D-1 College (City of Columbia)

Discussion

Parcel/Area Characteristics

The subject property has frontage along Monticello Road. Monticello Road is a five-lane undivided principal arterial road with sidewalks along one side. The immediate area is characterized by a mix of residential, commercial uses and an institutional use. South of the site is an automobile repair shop. North of the site is an undeveloped parcel. West of the site is Columbia International University. East of the site are two parcels containing single-family residences. Public Services The subject parcel is within the boundaries of School District One. Eau Claire High School is located 2.3 miles southeast of the subject parcel on Monticello Road. The Crane Creek fire station (number 18) is located 2.3 miles northeast of the subject parcel on Fairfield Road. Records indicate that the parcel is in the City’s water and sewer service area. Being within a service area is not a guarantee that services are available to the parcel. Plans & Policies

The 2015 Richland County Comprehensive Plan, “PUTTING THE PIECES IN PLACE”, designates this area as Neighborhood Medium Density. Land Use and Character Areas include medium-density residential neighborhoods and supporting neighborhood commercial scale development designed in a traditional neighborhood format. These neighborhoods provide a transition from Neighborhood (Low-Density) to more intense Mixed Residential (High-Density) urban environments. Multi-family development should occur near activity centers and within Priority Investment Areas with access to roadways with adequate capacity and multimodal transportation options. Nonresidential development may be considered for location along main road corridors and within a contextually-appropriate distance from the intersection of a primary arterial.

2

Page 9: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Desired Development Pattern The primary use within this area is medium density residential neighborhoods designed to provide a mix of residential uses and densities within neighborhoods. Neighborhoods should be connected and be designed using traditional grid or modified grid designs. Non-residential uses should be designed to be easily accessible to surrounding neighborhoods via multiple transportation modes. Traffic Characteristics The 2016 SCDOT traffic count (Station # 249) located south of the subject parcel on Monticello Road identifies 9,200 Average Daily Trips (ADT’s). This segment of Monticello Road is classified as a five lane undivided principal arterial, maintained by SCDOT with a design capacity of 33,600 ADT’s. Monticello Road is currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) “A”. The ADT’s are the total volume of traffic passing a point on a roadway during a 24-hour period. ADT’s data is collected by SCDOT. There are no planned or programmed improvements for this section of Monticello Road through the County Penny Sales Tax program or through SCDOT. Conclusion

The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the objectives outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. The subject parcel is located within the Neighborhood (Medium Density) future land use classification. According to the Plan’s desired development pattern, “Nonresidential development may be considered for location along main road corridors and within a contextually-appropriate distance from the intersection of a primary arterial.”. The subject parcel is not located near the intersection of a primary arterial. For these reasons, staff recommends Disapproval of this map amendment. Zoning Public Hearing Date June 26, 2018.

3

Page 10: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

277

Two Notch

Rd

Farrow Rd

Beltline Blvd

Fores

t Dr

Perciva

l Rd

Bluff Rd

Main S

t

Gerva

is St

Monticello

Rd

Broad River Rd

Harden St

Lees

burg

Rd

Fairfield Rd

Devin

e St

Rosewood Dr

Bull St

Alpine Rd

Taylo

r St

Huger St

Garne

rs Fe

rry Rd

Assembly St

Blosso

m St

River D

r

Decker Blvd

Polo R

d

Millw

ood A

ve

Wilson Blvd

Elmwo

od Av

e

Fort J

acks

on B

lvd

Colonia

l Dr

Greystone Blvd

Rose

wood

Blvd

Elmwo

od Av

e

Greg

Pear

ce

Paul

Livin

gston

Seth

Rose

Dalhi

Myer

s

Yvon

ne M

cBrid

e

Dalhi

Myer

sNo

rman

Jack

son

Gwen

dolyn

Ken

nedy

Jim M

annin

gJo

yce D

ickers

on

§̈¦20

§̈¦26

§̈¦77§̈¦126

£ ¤321

£ ¤378

Monticello

Heyward Brockington

Colum

bia

Monticello Rd

Sara

Matthe

ws Rd

International BlvdUnnam

ed StMonti

cello

Rd

Unna

med St

t

Site

ÊIn

set

1. Ca

se 18-

019 MA

Moham

mad T

abass

umR07

600-02

-25712

5 Mont

icello

Road

DISTRIC

T 4 - P

aul Liv

ingsto

n0.1

00.1

0.20.0

5Mi

les

4

Page 11: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Columbia

Monticello Rd

Sara Matthews Rd

Unnamed St

Heyward Brockington Rd

Monticello Rd

Unnamed St

Google

0 310 620 930 1,240155Feet

Ê

WETLANDSSPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA

t

Case 18-019 MARU to NCTMS R07600-02-25

5

Page 12: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

Monticello Rd

Sara Matthews Rd

Unnamed St

Intern

ation

al Blv

d

Heyw

ard B

rock

ingto

n Rd

Unnamed St

Monticello Rd

Unnamed St

Unnamed St

Case 18-019 MARU to NC

t

City ofColumbia

±ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

CC-1CC-2CC-3CC-4

C-1C-3RG-2RR

RS-ERS-LDRS-MDRS-HD

MHRM-MDRM-HDOI

NCGCRCM-1

LIHIPDDRU

TROSSubjectProperty

6

Page 13: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

¬«76

¬«321

¬«176

¬«21

¬«378

277

MONTICELLORD

BROAD RIVERRD

MAINST

KENNERLYRDFA

I RF IE

LDRD

WILS

ONBL

VD

FULMER RD

MULLERRD

FARROWRD

GERVAISST

C EDA R CREEK RD

LORICK RD

BLYTHEWOODRDTW

ONO

TCHRD

HARDENST

BULLST

CAMP GROU NDRD

TAYLORST

BELTLINEBLVD

DEVINEST

WIL DFLOW ERRD

SHAD Y GROVERD

W INNSBORORD

FORESTDR

RIVERDR

OLD TAMAHRD

MONTGOMER YRD

KOON STORERDHOLLINGSHEDRD

CR ANE CHURCHRD

MILLWOODAVE

LAKE MURRAYBLVD

PINEY WOOD S RD

LOST CREEKDR

DREHER SHOALSRD

ELMWOODAVE

COLONIALD

RGREYSTONEBLVD

HARBISONBLVD

BLOSSOMST

WINNSBORORD

WINNSBORORD

ELMWOODAVE

FUTURE LAND USE & PRIORITY INVESTMENT AREASN O R T H C E N T R A L P L A N N I N G A R E AN O R T H C E N T R A L P L A N N I N G A R E A

Legend100 Year FloodplainPriority Investment AreaPlanning Area Boundary

Activity Centers

!D! Community

!D! Neighborhood

!D! RuralMunicipalityConservationRural (Large Lot)RuralNeighborhood (Low Density)Neighborhood (Medium Density)Mixed Residential (High Density)Mixed Use CorridorEconomic Development Center/CorridorMilitary Installation 2 0 21

Miles[ Columbia

Blythewood

For more information onPriority Investment Areas, refer to the Priority Investment Element in Section 12 of the Comprehensive Plan.Adopted March 17, 2015

Columbia

7

PRICEG
Typewritten Text
PRICEG
Typewritten Text
PRICEG
Callout
Monticello Rd 18-019MA
Page 14: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

8

Page 15: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Richland County Planning & Development Services Department

Map Amendment Staff Report

PC MEETING DATE: June 4, 2018 RC PROJECT: 18-020 MA APPLICANT: Robert L. Legette LOCATION: Percival Road TAX MAP NUMBER: R16712-06-03 ACREAGE: .51 acres EXISTING ZONING: NC PROPOSED ZONING: GC PC SIGN POSTING: May 21, 2018 Staff Recommendation

Disapproval Eligibility for Map Amendment Request

Minimum area for zoning map amendment application. No request for a change in zoning classification shall be considered that involves an area of less than two (2) acres, except changes that involve one of the following: (Ord. 038-09HR; 7-21-09). In accordance with Section 26-52. Amendments (b) (2) b. 1. An extension of the same existing zoning district boundary. Background

Zoning History The original zoning as adopted September 7, 1977 was Neighborhood Commercial District (C-2). With the adoption of the 2005 Land Development Code, the C-2 District was designated Neighborhood Commercial District (NC). Zoning District Summary The General Commercial (GC) District is intended to accommodate a variety of commercial and non-residential uses characterized primarily by retail, office, and service establishments oriented primarily to major traffic arteries or extensive areas of predominantly commercial usage. No minimum lot area, except as required by DHEC. The maximum allowed density for residential uses is sixteen (16) dwelling units per acre. Based upon a gross density calculation, the maximum number of units for this site is approximately: 8 dwelling units*.

9

Page 16: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

*In calculating the maximum number of dwelling units, site characteristics, restrictions, land used for installation of infrastructure (which often amounts to 20-30% of the site) are not taken into consideration. Direction Existing Zoning Use

North: RM-HD Multi-family (Quail Run Apartments)

South: C-1 Office (City of Columbia)

East: GC/RG-2 Convenience Store with pumps & Restaurant /Telecommunications Tower(City of Columbia)

West: NC/RM-HD Undeveloped/Multi-family(Hunters Run Apartments) Discussion

Parcel/Area Characteristics

The subject property has frontage on Lake Avenue and Percival Road. Lake avenue is a two lane undivided local Road without sidewalks and streetlights along this section. Percival Road is a two-lane undivided minor arterial without sidewalks and streetlights along this section. The immediate area is characterized by a mix of residential and commercial uses. North of the site is a Residential Multi-family High Density (RM-HD) District parcel with a multi-family development (Quail Run Apartments). South of the site is an office structure zoned C-1 District and located in the City of Columbia’s jurisdiction. East of the site is a telecommunications tower zoned RG-2 District and located in the City of Columbia’s jurisdiction. There is also a GC District parcel east of the site with a convenience store with pumps and a restaurant. West of the site is an undeveloped Neighborhood Commercial District and a RM-HD District parcel with a multi-family development. Public Services The subject parcel is within the boundaries of Richland School District Two. Brockman Elementary School is located 1.71 miles west of the subject parcel at 2245 Montclair Dr. Records indicate that the parcel is within the City of Columbia’s water service area and is in within East Richland County Public Service District sewer service area. There is a fire hydrant located northwest of the site on Percival Road. The Gills Creek fire station (station number 33) is located on Old Forest Drive, approximately .42 miles south of the subject parcel. Being within a service area is not a guarantee that services are available to the parcel. Plans & Policies

The 2015 Richland County Comprehensive Plan, “PUTTING THE PIECES IN PLACE”, designates this area as Mixed Residential (High Density). Land Use and Design Areas include much of the urban and suburban developed areas in the County as well as edge areas adjacent to other jurisdictions in the County. These are densely developed urban and suburban areas, or opportunities for dense suburban development. Mixed residential areas include the full range of uses supportive of neighborhood, community, and regional commercial and employment needs. Residential single-family, multi-family, office and institutional, general and neighborhood commercial, and recreational uses are appropriate for this area. Some light industrial uses are also found today in these areas, but additional industrial development with significant community impacts (i.e., noise, exhaust, odor, heavy truck traffic) is discouraged,

10

Page 17: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

unless the area is identified specifically for these uses. Schools, churches, parks, and other institutional uses help support the full service nature of Mixed Residential areas. Desired Development Pattern Developments should reinforce the guiding principle of making neighborhoods and communities in Richland County more livable. Mixed Residential areas should provide a mix of housing opportunities within individual developments, preferably organized around a neighborhood center or public space. To the extent possible, commercial and office development should be located in Activity Centers and in Mixed Use Corridors. High density residential uses should be located proximate to or incorporated within Activity Centers, increasing existing and future opportunities for transit service to these locations. Grid and modified grid development patterns are preferred over curvilinear and cul-de-sac designs to support connectivity. Traffic Characteristics The 2017 SCDOT traffic count (Station #214) located south of the subject parcel on Percival Road identifies 11,000 Average Daily Trips (ADT’s). Percival Road is classified as a two lane undivided minor arterial, maintained by SCDOT with a design capacity of 10,800 ADT’s. Percival Road is currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) “D”. The ADT’s are the total volume of traffic passing a point on a roadway during a 24-hour period. ADT’s data is collected by SCDOT. There are planned improvements for this section of Percival Road through the County Penny Sales Tax program. There are sidewalks proposed from Forest Drive to Northshore Road. Construction has not been started this time. There are no planned or programmed improvements for this section of Percival Road through the COATS 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Conclusion

The subject parcel is located within the Mixed Residential (High Density) land use designation of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zoning district is not consistent with the recommendations outlined in the Comprehensive Plan for nonresidential development to be considered for location in or in proximity to Activity Centers or in Mixed Use Corridors. In addition, the proposed zoning designation would permit uses which are not in character with the existing development pattern of the surrounding area. For this reason, staff recommends Disapproval of this map amendment. Zoning Public Hearing Date June 26, 2018.

11

Page 18: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Lees

burg

Rd

Bluff Rd

Beltline BlvdFo

rest D

r

Garne

rs Ferr

y Rd

Devin

e St

Two Notch Rd

Percival

Rd

Air Ba

se R

d

Rose

wood

Dr

Harmon Rd

Millwo

od Av

eGerva

is St

Harden St

Lower Richland Blvd

Fort J

acks

on B

lvd

Old Hopkins Rd

Congaree Rd

Rose

wood

Blvd

Lower Richland Blvd

Dalhi

Myer

s

Norm

an Ja

ckson

Greg

Pear

ce

Dalhi

Myer

s

Seth

RoseYv

onne

McB

ride

Jim M

annin

g

Paul

Livin

gston

§̈¦77

£ ¤378

£ ¤1

£ ¤378Percival

Colum

bia

Fores

t Acre

s

Fores

t Acre

s Fores

t Acre

s

I77 S

I77 N

Percival R

d

Arbor Dr

Lake

Ave

Gill C

reek R

d

Woodvine Rd

Unna

med S

t

I77

Eagle

Park

Dr

Cres

cent

StLake Ct

Unnamed St

§̈¦77

t

Site

ÊIn

set

2. Ca

se 18-

020 MA

Robert

L. Leg

etteR16

712-06

-03441

Perciv

al Roa

dDIS

TRICT 6

- Greg

Pearc

e0.1

00.1

0.20.0

5Mi

les

12

Page 19: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Columbia

Forest Acres

Percival R

d

I77 S

I77 N

Lake Ave

Arbo

r Dr

Gill Creek Rd

Eagle Park Dr

Lake

Ct

Hawk

eye C

t

Quail Run Ln

Northridge Rd

I77

Eagle Feath

er Loop

Gill Creek Ct

Quail

Run L

n

§̈¦77

Google

0 310 620 930 1,240155Feet

Ê

WETLANDSSPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA

t

Case 18-020 MANC to GCTMS R16712-06-03

13

Page 20: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!!

!!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!! !

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!! !!

!!!!

!!!! !!

!!!! !

!!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !

!

!!

!!

!!

!! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !

!

!!

!!

!!

!! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!

Perci

val R

d

I77 S

Lake Ave

I77 N

Arbo

r Dr

Lake

Ct

Quail

Run L

n

Eagle Park Dr

Case 18-020 MANC to GC

tCity of

Columbia

±ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

CC-1CC-2CC-3CC-4

C-1C-3RG-2RR

RS-ERS-LDRS-MDRS-HD

MHRM-MDRM-HDOI

NCGCRCM-1

LIHIPDDRU

TROSSubjectProperty

14

Page 21: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

7¬«321

¬«1

¬«21

¬«76

¬«378

§̈¦26

§̈¦20

§̈¦77

§̈¦126

277

BLUFFRD

MAINST

MONT ICELLORD

BROAD RIVERRD

FAI R

FI EL D

R D

PERCIVALRD

BELTLINEBLVD

FORESTDR

TWO NOTC

HRD

GERVAISST

WILSON BLVD

POL ORD

HARDENST

DEVINEST

ALPINERD

GA

ROSEWOODDR

BULLST

BRICKYARDRD

HARD SCRABBLERD

HUGERSTTAYLORST

ASSEMBLYST

BLOSS OMST

RIVERDR

DECKERBLVD

FARROW

RD

KOON STORERD

CRANE CHURCHRDMILLWOODAVE

PINEY WOOD S RD

LOST CREEKDR

ELMWOODAVE

FORT JACKSONBLVD

COLONIALDR

HAR

BISONBL VD

ROSEWOODBLVD

FARROWRD

ELMWOODAVE

Legend100 Year FloodplainPlanning Area BoundaryPriority Investment Area

Activity Center

!D! Community

!D! Neighborhood

!D! RuralMunicipalityConservationRural (Large Lot)RuralNeighborhood (Low Density)Neighborhood (Medium Density)Mixed Residential (High Density)Mixed Use CorridorEconomic Development Center/CorridorMilitary Installation

FUTURE LAND USE & PRIORITY INVESTMENT AREASB E L T W A Y P L A N N I N G A R E AB E L T W A Y P L A N N I N G A R E A 2 01

For more informatPriority Investment A

refer to the Priority InvesElement in Section 12

ComprehensiveAdopted March 17

LEESBURGRD

RNERS FERRYRD

MONT

GOME

RYLN

OLD HOPKINSRD

AIR BASERD

2Miles[

ion onreas,

tment of the Plan., 2015

15

xx900082
Callout
Percival Road Case 18-020MA
Page 22: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

16

Page 23: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Richland County Planning & Development Services Department

Map Amendment Staff Report

PC MEETING DATE: June, 2018 RC PROJECT: 18-021 MA APPLICANT: Christopher Alford LOCATION: 7430 Fairfield Road TAX MAP NUMBER: R11904-02-05 ACREAGE: 2 acres EXISTING ZONING: CC-4 PROPOSED ZONING: CC-2 PC SIGN POSTING: May 21, 2018 Staff Recommendation Disapproval Background Zoning History The original zoning as adopted September 7, 1977 was Light Industrial (M-1) District. Zoning History for the General Area The CC-1, Residential District parcels east of the site were rezoned under case number 10-006MA. The CC-4 Industrial District parcels east and south of the site were rezoned under case number 10-006MA. The CC-3 Activity Center Mixed Use District parcels southeast of the site were rezoned under case number 10-006MA. Zoning District Summary CC-2, Neighborhood Mixed Use: The CC-2 sub-district permits a mixture of uses that create a land use transition between existing residential neighborhoods and potential commercial areas that abut this area. The zone allows a variety of building types, including civic/institutional, townhouses, detached single-family housing, loft dwelling units, and commercial/office with encouragement of mixed-use buildings that meet a variety of daily needs of residents in surrounding neighborhoods. No minimum lot area, except as required by DHEC. The maximum allowed density for residential uses are:

17

Page 24: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Neighborhood Mixed Use CC-2 District Density Summary

Use Base Density Bonus Density Single-family, detached 3 du/acre 4.5 du/acre

Townhouse 6 du/ acre 9 du/ acre

Live-Work Units 6 du/ acre 9 du/ acre

Loft Dwelling Units 8 du/acre 12 du/acre

Direction Existing Zoning Use North: CC-4 Office

South: CC-4 Building Supply Sales (Marble and Granite)

East: M-1 Undeveloped

West: CC-4 Office

Discussion Parcel/Area Characteristics

The site has frontage along Fairfield Road. The site contains a nonresidential structure. There are no sidewalks or streetlights along this Fairfield Road. The surrounding area is characterized by industrial uses and undeveloped parcels. The parcel east of the site is undeveloped. South of the site is a building supply store. West and north of the subject parcel are office structures. Public Services The Crane Creek fire station (station number 18) is located on Fairfield Road, approximately .54 miles southeast of the subject parcel. The Carolina School for Inquiry is located .39 miles southeast of the subject parcel on Fairfield Road. Records indicate that the parcel is in the City of Columbia’s water and sewer service area. Being within a service area is not a guarantee that services are available to the parcel.

Plans & Policies The Comprehensive Plan, “PUTTING THE PIECES IN PLACE”, designates this area as Neighborhood (Low-Density). Land Use and Design Areas where low-density residential is the primary use. These areas serve as a transition between Rural and Neighborhood (Medium-Density) areas, and are opportunities for low-density traditional neighborhood development and open space developments that preserve open spaces and natural features. Commercial development should be located within nearby Neighborhood Activity Centers, and may be considered for location along main road corridors and within a contextually-appropriate distance from the intersection of a primary arterial. Places of worship and parks are appropriate institutional uses, but should be designed to mitigate impacts on surrounding neighborhoods. Industrial development with significant community impacts (i.e., noise, exhaust, odor, heavy truck traffic) is discouraged in these areas. Desired Development Pattern Lower-density, single-family neighborhood developments are preferred. Open space developments that provide increased densities in trade for the protection of open spaces and recreational areas are also encouraged. Residential developments that incorporate more open

18

Page 25: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

spaces and protection of natural areas through the use of natural stormwater management techniques, such as swales, are encouraged. Homes in neighborhoods can be supported by small-scale neighborhood commercial establishments located at primary arterial intersections, preferably within Neighborhood Commercial Activity Centers. Crane Creek Neighborhood Master Plan The “Crane Creek” Neighborhood Master Plan recommends that Redevelopment and New Development limit industrial growth and promote rezoning industrial to commercial. Traffic Characteristics The 2017 SCDOT traffic count (Station #189) located north of the subject parcel on Fairfield Road identifies 7,700 Average Daily Trips (ADT’s). This section of Fairfield Road is classified as a four lane undivided principal arterial road, maintained by SCDOT with a design capacity of 29,200 ADT’s. This segment of Fairfield Road is currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) “A”. The ADT’s are the total volume of traffic passing a point on a roadway during a 24-hour period. ADT’s data is collected by SCDOT. There are no planned or programmed improvements for this section of Fairfield Road, either through SCDOT or the County Penny Sales Tax program.

Conclusion The proposed rezoning request will allow commercial uses which are consistent with the objectives of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan. However, the subject site is not located within a contextually-appropriate distance from the intersection of a primary arterial or within a Neighborhood Activity Center, as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan for commercial development. The request will also allow residential type uses which aren’t consistent with the Plan. In addition, the immediate area’s development pattern and existing industrial uses and zoning, are in conflict with the recommendations of the Crane Creek Master Plan, which deemphasizes industrial and promotes commercial. For these reasons, staff recommends Disapproval of this map amendment.

Zoning Public Hearing Date June 26, 2018.

19

Page 26: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

277

Perciv

al Rd

Two Notch Rd

Wilson Blvd

Farrow Rd

Fairfield Rd

Clemson

Rd

Fores

t Dr

Hard

Scrab

ble R

d

Main S

t

Polo R

d

Fulmer Rd

Loric

k Rd

Beltlin

e Blvd

Montice

llo Rd

Killia

n Rd

Gerva

is St

Bull St

Alpine Rd

Bookman Rd

Winnsboro Rd

Taylo

r St

Brick

yard

Rd

Harden St

River D

r

Decker Blvd

Summit Pkwy

Koon

Stor

e Rd

Crane C

hurch

Rd

Lees

burg

RdMi

llwoo

d Ave

Kelly Mill R

dCa

mp G

round

Rd

Long

town R

d

Screa

ming

Eag

le Rd

Elmwo

od Av

eColonial Dr

E Killia

n Rd

Farrow Rd

Clems

on R

d

Dalhi

Myer

s

Gwen

dolyn

Ken

nedy

Jim M

annin

g

Calvi

n "Ch

ip" Ja

ckson

Yvon

ne M

cBrid

e

Greg

Pear

ce

Paul

Livin

gston

Joyc

e Dick

erson

Joyc

e Dick

erson

Seth

Rose

Seth

Rose

§̈¦20

§̈¦77

£ ¤1

£ ¤21

£ ¤76

Fairfield

Crane Church

Fairfield Rd

Crane Church Rd

Saddlefield Rd

Payto

n Pl

Bridle Trl

Lincol

nshir

e Sq

t

Site

ÊIn

set

3. Ca

se 18-

021 MA

Christo

pher A

lford

R11904

-02-05

7430 F

airfield

Road

DISTRIC

T 7 - G

wendo

lyn Ke

nnedy

0.15

00.1

50.3

0.075

Miles

20

Page 27: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Fairf

ield R

d

Wessinger Rd

Walter Hills Rd

Fairfield Park RdGoogle

0 525 1,050 1,575 2,100262.5Feet

Ê

WETLANDSSPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA

t

Case 18-021 MACC-4 to CC-2TMS R11904-02-05

21

Page 28: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Fairf

ield R

d

Crane Church RdSaddlefield Rd

Wessinger Rd

Walter Hills Rd

Payton Pl

Fairfield Park Rd

Case 18-021 MACC-4 to CC-2

s

±ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

CC-1CC-2CC-3CC-4

C-1C-3RG-2RR

RS-ERS-LDRS-MDRS-HD

MHRM-MDRM-HDOI

NCGCRCM-1

LIHIPDDRU

TROSSubjectProperty

22

Page 29: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

¬«76

¬«321

¬«176

¬«21

¬«378

277

MONTICELLORD

BROAD RIVERRD

MAINST

KENNERLYRDFA

I RF IE

LDRD

WILS

ONBL

VD

FULMER RD

MULLERRD

FARROWRD

GERVAISST

C EDA R CREEK RD

LORICK RD

BLYTHEWOODRDTW

ONO

TCHRD

HARDENST

BULLST

CAMP GROU NDRD

TAYLORST

BELTLINEBLVD

DEVINEST

WIL DFLOW ERRD

SHAD Y GROVERD

W INNSBORORD

FORESTDR

RIVERDR

OLD TAMAHRD

MONTGOMER YRD

KOON STORERDHOLLINGSHEDRD

CR ANE CHURCHRD

MILLWOODAVE

LAKE MURRAYBLVD

PINEY WOOD S RD

LOST CREEKDR

DREHER SHOALSRD

ELMWOODAVE

COLONIALD

RGREYSTONEBLVD

HARBISONBLVD

BLOSSOMST

WINNSBORORD

WINNSBORORD

ELMWOODAVE

FUTURE LAND USE & PRIORITY INVESTMENT AREASN O R T H C E N T R A L P L A N N I N G A R E AN O R T H C E N T R A L P L A N N I N G A R E A

Legend100 Year FloodplainPriority Investment AreaPlanning Area Boundary

Activity Centers

!D! Community

!D! Neighborhood

!D! RuralMunicipalityConservationRural (Large Lot)RuralNeighborhood (Low Density)Neighborhood (Medium Density)Mixed Residential (High Density)Mixed Use CorridorEconomic Development Center/CorridorMilitary Installation 2 0 21

Miles[ Columbia

Blythewood

For more information onPriority Investment Areas, refer to the Priority Investment Element in Section 12 of the Comprehensive Plan.Adopted March 17, 2015

Columbia

23

PRICEG
Typewritten Text
PRICEG
Typewritten Text
PRICEG
Callout
Fairfield Road 18-021MA
Page 30: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

24

Page 31: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Richland County Planning & Development Services Department

Map Amendment Staff Report

PC MEETING DATE: June 4, 2018 RC PROJECT: 18-022 MA APPLICANT: Scott Morrison LOCATION: 204 Langford Road TAX MAP NUMBER: R15200-05-02 (Portion of) ACREAGE: 10.81 acres EXISTING ZONING: RU PROPOSED ZONING: RS-E PC SIGN POSTING: May 21, 2018 Staff Recommendation Approval Background Zoning History The original zoning as adopted September 7, 1977 was Rural District (RU). Zoning History for the General Area The Planned Development District (PDD) parcels east, west and south of the subject parcel were approved under Ordinance No. 061-06HR (case number 06-012MA). Zoning District Summary The RS-E District is intended to be used for single-family detached dwelling units on large “estate” lots. The requirements for this district are designed to provide for a low to medium density rural setting for residential development in areas that separate more urban communities from the truly rural portions of Richland County. Minimum lot area: 20,000 square feet, or as determined by DHEC, but in no case shall it be less than 20,000 square feet. Maximum density standard: no more than one (1) principal dwelling unit may be placed on a lot, except for permitted accessory dwellings. However, see the special requirement provisions for single-family zero lot line dwellings at Section 26-151(c) of this chapter. Based upon a gross density calculation*, the maximum number of units for this site is approximately: 23 dwelling units. *In calculating the maximum number of dwelling units, site characteristics, restrictions, land used for installation of infrastructure (which often amounts to 20-30% of the site), or application of open space provisions are not taken into consideration.

25

Page 32: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Direction Existing Zoning Use North: D-1/ RS-1 (both in Town of Blythewood) Residence/ Undeveloped

South: PDD Undeveloped Residential PDD

East: PDD Undeveloped Residential PDD

West: PDD Undeveloped Residential PDD

Discussion Parcel/Area Characteristics

The site has frontage along Langford Road. The site is mostly undeveloped with the exception of a telecommunications tower. There are sidewalks or street lamps along this section of Langford Road. The surrounding area is primarily characterized by residential uses and undeveloped parcels. South, west and east of the site is an undeveloped single-family residential PDD. North of the site is a residence and undeveloped parcel. Public Services The Blythewood fire station (station number 26) is located on Main Street, approximately .4 miles northwest of the subject parcel. There is a fire hydrant located west of the site along Langford Road. Records indicate that the parcel is in the City of Columbia’s water service area and located in Richland County’s sewer service area. The property is also adjacent to Palmetto Utilities sewer service area. Being within a service area is not a guarantee that services are available to the parcel.

Plans & Policies The 2015 Richland County Comprehensive Plan, “PUTTING THE PIECES IN PLACE”, designates this area as Neighborhood (Low-Density). Land Use and Design Areas where low-density residential is the primary use. These areas serve as a transition between Rural and Neighborhood (Medium-Density) areas, and are opportunities for low-density traditional neighborhood development and open space developments that preserve open spaces and natural features. Commercial development should be located within nearby Neighborhood Activity Centers, and may be considered for location along main road corridors and within a contextually-appropriate distance from the intersection of a primary arterial. Places of worship and parks are appropriate institutional uses, but should be designed to mitigate impacts on surrounding neighborhoods. Industrial development with significant community impacts (i.e., noise, exhaust, odor, heavy truck traffic) is discouraged in these areas. Desired Development Pattern Lower-density, single-family neighborhood developments are preferred. Open space developments that provide increased densities in trade for the protection of open spaces and recreational areas are also encouraged (see Desired Pattern for Rural areas for more information on open space developments). Residential developments that incorporate more open spaces and protection of natural areas through the use of natural stormwater management techniques, such as swales, are encouraged. Homes in neighborhoods can be supported by small-scale neighborhood commercial establishments located at primary arterial intersections, preferably within Neighborhood Commercial Activity Centers.

26

Page 33: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Traffic Characteristics The 2017 SCDOT traffic count (Station # 494) located west of the subject parcel on Blythewood Road identifies 19,500 Average Daily Trips (ADT’s). Blythewood Road is classified as a two lane undivided collector road, maintained by SCDOT with a design capacity of 8,600 ADT’s. This segment of Blythewood Road is currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) “F”. The 2017 SCDOT traffic count (Station # 305) located west of the subject parcel on Langford Road identifies 6,700 Average Daily Trips (ADT’s). Langford Road is classified as a two lane undivided collector road, maintained by SCDOT with a design capacity of 8,600 ADT’s. This segment of Langford Road is currently operating at Level of Service (LOS) “C”. There are planned improvements for this section Blythewood Road through the County Penny Sales Tax program. The proposed scope recommends a 5-lane (4 travel lanes with a center turn lane) improvement from I-77 west to Syrup Mill Road. Provisions for bicycle and pedestrian accommodation are proposed through the construction of offset, shared-use paths. This project also includes the Phase 2 roundabout at the intersection of Community Rd and Cobblestone. There are no planned or programmed improvements for this section Langford Road, either through SCDOT or the County Penny Sales Tax program.

Conclusion The subject site is located in the Neighborhood (Low Density) Land Use classification and would be in character with the land use and desired development pattern recommended in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan for the this classification. In addition, the proposed density of the request (2.2/acre) is consistent with the density of the surrounding PDD (2.8/acre). For these reasons, staff recommends Approval of this map amendment.

Zoning Public Hearing Date June 26, 2018.

27

Page 34: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

277

Farrow Rd

Perciv

al Rd

Monti

cello

Rd

Two N

otch R

d

Broad

River R

d

Lang

ford R

d

Fairfield Rd

Hard Scrabble Rd

Kelly Mill Rd

Clemson

Rd

Kennerly Rd

Fores

t Dr

Fulmer Rd

Lees

burg

RdGe

rvais

St

Polo R

d

Heins

RdBly

thewo

od R

d

Beltline Blvd

Ceda

r Cree

k Rd

Loric

k Rd

Muller

Rd

Killia

n Rd

Bull St

Rimer

Pond

Rd

Alpine Rd

Bookman Rd

Smyrn

a Chu

rch Rd

Harde

n St

Taylo

r St

Brick

yard

Rd

Grover Wilson Rd

Wildflow

er Rd

Camp

Grou

nd R

d

Wilson Blvd

Winnsboro Rd

Devin

e St

Heyward Brockington Rd

River

Dr

Screa

ming

Eag

le Rd

Decker Blvd

Hollingshed Rd

Koon

Stor

e Rd

Longtown Rd

Lost Creek Dr Piney Woods Rd

Main S

t

Hinnants Store Rd

Greystone Blvd

Mulle

r Rd

Wilson Blvd

Wilson Blvd

Winnsboro Rd

Joyc

e Dick

erson

Dalhi

Myer

s

Gwen

dolyn

Ken

nedy

Calvi

n "Ch

ip" Ja

ckson

Jim M

annin

g

Paul

Livin

gston

Yvon

ne M

cBrid

e

Greg

Pear

ce

Bill M

alino

wski

Seth

Rose

Seth

Rose

Norm

an Ja

ckson

§̈¦26

§̈¦20

§̈¦77

§̈¦126

£ ¤1

£ ¤76

£ ¤21

£ ¤21

Langford

Main Wilson

Blythe

wood

Blyth

ewoo

d

Langfo

rd Rd

Main St

Sand

field

Rd

Wilson Blvd

McNu

lty S

t

Salleys Ln

Unna

med S

t

Unna

med S

t

t

Site

ÊIn

set

4. Ca

se 18-

022 MA

Scott M

orrison

R15200

-05-02

(Portio

n of)

204 La

ngford

Road

DISTRIC

T 2 - J

oyce D

ickers

on0.1

50

0.15

0.30.0

75Mi

les

28

Page 35: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Blythewood

Blythewood

Main

St

Langford Rd

Sandfield Rd

Wilson Blvd

McNulty StAlvina Hagood Cir

Patriots Way

Google

0 525 1,050 1,575 2,100262.5Feet

Ê

WETLANDSSPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA

t

Case 18-022 MARU to RS-ETMS R15200-05-02

29

Page 36: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!! !

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !!

!! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!!!

!!

!

!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !!!! !! !! !!

!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! ! !!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!! !! !! !! !! !!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!! !

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!

!

!!!

!!!!

!!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!

!!!!!!

!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!

!!!!!!

!!!!

!!!!!!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!! !! !

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!! !! !! !!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !! !

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!! !!

!!!!

!!!! !

!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!

!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!! !

!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !! !! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!

!!!!!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!! !!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!! !! !!

!!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!! !! !! !!

!!!!

!! !!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!!!

!!!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!! !!!! !!

!! !!!! !!

!! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! !! !

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!!!

!! !!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!!!!

!!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !!!! !

!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!

!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!! !! !! ! !!!

!!

!!!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

!!

Main

St

Langford Rd

Sandfield Rd

Wilson Blvd

McLean Rd

McNulty St

Blythewood Rd

Unnamed St

Salleys LnBo

ney R

d

Alvina

Hago

od Ci

r

Unna

med S

t

Unnamed St

Boney Rd

Case 18-022 MARU to RS-E

s

Town ofBlythewood

±ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

CC-1CC-2CC-3CC-4

C-1C-3RG-2RR

RS-ERS-LDRS-MDRS-HD

MHRM-MDRM-HDOI

NCGCRCM-1

LIHIPDDRU

TROSSubjectProperty

30

Page 37: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

¬«601

¬«1

¬«21

¬«21

277

FARROWRD

PERCIVALRDTW

O NOTCHRD

LEESBURGRD

CLEMSONRD

LANGFORDRD

HARD

SCRAB

BLERD

K ELLY MILLRD

FORESTDR

FULMER RD

SCREAMING EAGLERDFAI RF IELD RD

HEINSRD

POLORD

BELTLINEBLVD

KILLIANRD

RIMER PONDRD

BOOKM

ANRD

ALPINERD

MCCO

RDS F

ERRY

RD

SMYRNA CHURCHRD

DEVINEST

BRICKYARDRD

HARDENST

BLYT

HEWOODRD

GROVER WILSONRDWI

LSON

BLVD

GERVAISST

LOR I CKRD

SUM MITPKWY

DECKERBLVD

M ULLERRD

LONGTOWNRD

KOON STORERD

MILLWOODAVE

MAINS

T

SPEARS CREEK CHURCHRD

CONGRESSRDBLOSSOMST

W KILLIANRD

WILSONBLVD

CLEMSONRD

MCCO

RDS F

ERRY

RD

WILS

ONBL

VD

MAINST

FUTURE LAND USE & PRIORITY INVESTMENT AREASN O R T H E A S T P L A N N I N G A R E AN O R T H E A S T P L A N N I N G A R E A

Legend100 Year FloodplainPriority Investment AreaPlanning Area Boundary

Activity Center!D! Community

!D! Neighborhood

!D! RuralMunicipalityConservationRural (Large Lot)RuralNeighborhood (Low Density)Neighborhood (Medium Density)Mixed Residential (High Density)Mixed Use CorridorEconomic Development Center/CorridorMilitary Installation

2 0 21Miles[

Fort Jackson

For more information onPriority Investment Areas, refer to the Priority Investment Element in Section 12 of the Comprehensive Plan.Adopted March 17, 2015

31

heglert
Callout
Langford Rd 18-022MA
Page 38: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

32

Page 39: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

RICHLAND COUNTY COUNCIL ZONING PUBLIC HEARING

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Agenda

7:00 pm

2020 Hampton Street

2nd Floor, Council Chambers

STAFF:

Tracy Hegler, AICP .........................Community Planning and Development Director

Geonard Price ............................................... Division Manager/Zoning Administrator

CALL TO ORDER ............................................................................. Honorable Joyce Dickerson

Chair of Richland County Council

ADDITIONS / DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA

ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

OPEN PUBLIC HEARING

a. MAP AMENDMENTS

1. Case # 18-007 MA

Phil Savage RU to NC (3.95 acres) 2241 Dutch Fork Road TMS# R01507-02-01 PDSD Recommendation - Disapproval Planning Commission - Disapproval (6-2) Council unanimously approved the rezoning request.

District 1 Bill Malinowski

2. Case # 18-012 MA LM Drucker OI to RS-LD (.71 acres) 1344 Omarest Drive TMS# R07405-06-05 PDSD Recommendation - Disapproval Planning Commision - Approval (8-0) Council unanimously approved the rezoning request.

District 4 Paul Livingston

3. Case # 18-013 MA Derrick J. Harris, Sr. RU to LI (1.83 acres) 7708 Fairfield Road TMS# R12000-02-22 PDSD Recommendation - Disapproval Planning Commission - Approval (8-0) Council unanimously approved the rezoning request.

District 7 Gwendolyn Kennedy

Page 40: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

4. Case # 18-014 MA Jermaine Johnson RS-MD to MH (.26 acre) 7901 Richard Street TMS# R16212-12-01 PDSD Recommendation - Disapproval Planning Commission - Approval (8-0) Council unanimously approved the rezoning request.

District 10 Dalhi Myers

5. Case # 18-015 MA Charlotte & Randy Huggins RU to GC (.59 acres) Horrell Hill Road TMS# R24700-09-02 PDSD Recommendation - Disapproval Planning Commission - Approval (7-1) Council unanimously approved the rezoning request.

District 11 Norman Jackson

6. Case # 18-016 MA Kamal Shlon RU to RS-HD (16.2 acres) 825 Hallbrook Road TMS# R19100-07-01 PDSD Recommendation - Disapproval Planning Commission - Approval (8-1) Council unanimously approved applicant’s request to withdraw.

District 11 Norman Jackson

OTHER BUSINESS

ADJOURNMENT: 7:27 pm

Page 41: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020
Page 42: RICHLAND COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONrichlandcountysc.gov/Portals/0/Departments... · 6/4/2018  · PDSD Recommendation – Disapproval Page 1 District 4 Paul Livingston 2. Case # 18-020

Richland County Government Phone (803) 576-2180 2020 Hampton Street Fax (803) 576-2182 Columbia, SC 29204