rick leavitt, smith group steve rulis, munich american re session 103f: group disability forum...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Rick Leavitt, Smith GroupRick Leavitt, Smith GroupSteve Rulis, Munich American ReSteve Rulis, Munich American Re
Session 103F: Group Disability ForumSession 103F: Group Disability ForumAnaheim Spring MeetingAnaheim Spring Meeting
May 21, 2004May 21, 2004
Modeling Alternative Pricing Modeling Alternative Pricing StrategiesStrategies
Modeling Alternative Pricing Modeling Alternative Pricing StrategiesStrategies
![Page 2: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
Rationale for ModelRationale for Model
Model ConstructionModel Construction
•New Sale DynamicsNew Sale Dynamics
•Renewal DynamicsRenewal Dynamics
Model OutputModel Output
Questions and DiscussionQuestions and Discussion
![Page 3: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
LTD Pricing IssuesLTD Pricing IssuesLTD Pricing IssuesLTD Pricing Issues
Manual Rate VarianceManual Rate Variance
Carriers Buying Market ShareCarriers Buying Market Share
Underwriting CycleUnderwriting Cycle
Short Term versus Long Term StrategiesShort Term versus Long Term Strategies
Pricing Slow to Respond to Risk DynamicsPricing Slow to Respond to Risk Dynamics
![Page 4: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Manual Rate VarianceManual Rate VarianceManual Rate VarianceManual Rate Variance
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5Average Rate
Car
rier
Rat
e
![Page 5: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Pricing Model AssumptionsPricing Model AssumptionsPricing Model AssumptionsPricing Model Assumptions
7 to 10 Carriers on Every Quote7 to 10 Carriers on Every Quote
All Manual Rates are Equally ValidAll Manual Rates are Equally Valid
Level of discounts determined by other quotesLevel of discounts determined by other quotes
All Sales Reps are equally proficientAll Sales Reps are equally proficient
![Page 6: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
New Case AssumptionsNew Case AssumptionsNew Case AssumptionsNew Case Assumptions Carriers more than 25% above the lowest rate have Carriers more than 25% above the lowest rate have no chance for saleno chance for sale
All Carriers within 5% of the lowest rate have equal All Carriers within 5% of the lowest rate have equal chance for sale chance for sale
Carriers between 5% and 25% above the lowest rate Carriers between 5% and 25% above the lowest rate have a diminishing chance of sale have a diminishing chance of sale
Carrier Rates are distinguished by three parametersCarrier Rates are distinguished by three parameters
Aggregate levelAggregate level
Variance of RateVariance of Rate
Maximum Discount AllowedMaximum Discount Allowed
![Page 7: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
New Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityMaximum Discount 20%Std Dev of Rates 10%
Manual Rate
MarginClose Ratio
Sold Discount
Sold Rate Margin
15% 2.7% 11.0% 0.3%
13% 3.2% 10.5% -1.4%
10% 3.8% 10.0% -3.3%
8% 4.4% 9.2% -4.7%
5% 4.9% 8.7% -6.3%
2% 5.6% 8.0% -8.1%
0% 6.2% 7.2% -10.0%
-3% 6.9% 6.8% -12.0%
-5% 7.8% 5.8% -14.5%
-8% 8.6% 5.2% -16.5%
-10% 9.6% 4.4% -19.0%
-13% 10.8% 3.8% -21.8%-15% 12.0% 3.2% -24.1% -25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%
Manual Rate Margin
Close Ratio
Sold Discount
Sold Rate Margin
![Page 8: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
New Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityManual Rate Margin 5%Std Dev of Rates 10%
Maximum Discount
Close Ratio
Sold Discount
Rate Margin
0% 2.8% 0.0% -1.2%
5% 3.2% 2.0% -2.0%
10% 3.8% 4.1% -3.8%
15% 4.3% 6.5% -4.8%
20% 4.9% 8.7% -6.5%
25% 5.5% 10.9% -8.0%
30% 6.1% 12.9% -9.4%
35% 6.6% 14.8% -11.0%40% 7.1% 16.4% -12.3%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Maximum Discount
Close Ratio
Sold Discount
Sold Rate Margin
![Page 9: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
New Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityManual Rate Margin 5%Maximum Discount 20%
StdDev of Rates
Close Ratio
Sold Discount
Rate Margin
0% 4.6% 10.6% -1.8%
5% 4.7% 10.2% -3.1%
10% 4.9% 8.7% -6.5%
15% 5.4% 6.7% -12.7%
20% 7.2% 4.6% -23.6%
25% 9.1% 3.0% -33.1%
30% 10.7% 2.4% -38.0%
35% 12.1% 1.9% -42.1%40% 12.7% 1.7% -44.4%
-50.0%
-40.0%
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Standard Deviation of Rates
Close Ratio
Sold Discount
Sold Rate Margin
![Page 10: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
New Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price ElasticityNew Sale: Price Elasticity
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
0% 2.5% 0.6% -4.2% -12.4% -19.4% -25.9%
5% 1.3% -0.2% -5.0% -11.8% -19.8% -26.0%
10% 0.1% -1.2% -5.5% -11.6% -18.2% -24.8%
15% -1.0% -2.5% -5.4% -11.6% -17.4% -23.1%
20% -2.7% -3.8% -6.6% -11.3% -18.8% -23.6%
25% -4.0% -4.9% -6.8% -11.8% -17.6% -24.3%
Sold Rate Margin with Manual Rate Margin set to Produce a 7% Close Ratio
Standard Deviation of Rates
Maxim
um
Discou
nt
![Page 11: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Renewal ModelRenewal ModelRenewal ModelRenewal Model
Some Cases will take almost any rate increaseSome Cases will take almost any rate increase
Some Cases will leave regardless of renewal actionSome Cases will leave regardless of renewal action
Incumbent has a rate advantage at time of sale Incumbent has a rate advantage at time of sale
Assumptions:Assumptions:
•95% Attrition95% Attrition
•Cases not shopped if increase is less than 5%Cases not shopped if increase is less than 5%
•25% cases are not shopped at any increase25% cases are not shopped at any increase
•Incumbent has 20% rate advantageIncumbent has 20% rate advantage
![Page 12: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Renewal ModelRenewal ModelRenewal ModelRenewal Model
IncreasePct Not Shopped
Shopped Persist
Total Persist
0% 100% 53% 93%
5% 100% 25% 93%
10% 86% 24% 83%
15% 76% 25% 78%
20% 67% 27% 73%
25% 58% 28% 68%
30% 40% 27% 58%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Increase
Percent not Out to Bid
Persistency on Cases Out to Bid
Total Persistency
![Page 13: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
10-Year Simulation10-Year Simulation10-Year Simulation10-Year Simulation
Fixed General Assumptions:Fixed General Assumptions:
•Consider Start-up BlockConsider Start-up Block
•No Change in Risk Dynamics over TimeNo Change in Risk Dynamics over Time
•2% Annual Growth in Available Employers2% Annual Growth in Available Employers
•Other Carriers follow a Stable Pricing PhilosophyOther Carriers follow a Stable Pricing Philosophy
Test Assumptions:Test Assumptions:
•Manual Rate MarginManual Rate Margin
•Manual Rate VarianceManual Rate Variance
•Maximum DiscountMaximum Discount
•Target Increase on RenewalTarget Increase on Renewal
•Rate GuaranteesRate Guarantees
•Maximum Number of Rate IncreasesMaximum Number of Rate Increases
![Page 14: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Scenario 1: On Target Pricing Scenario 1: On Target Pricing No Rate Increase on RenewalNo Rate Increase on Renewal
Scenario 1: On Target Pricing Scenario 1: On Target Pricing No Rate Increase on RenewalNo Rate Increase on Renewal
YearClose Ratio Persist Gain Premium Growth 1-Persistency
1 4.1% 9.7% 2,495K2 3.7% 97.6% 9.7% 4,583K 83.7% 2.4%3 3.6% 95.9% 9.9% 6,800K 48.4% 4.1%4 3.7% 93.2% 10.0% 8,943K 31.5% 6.8%5 3.7% 96.0% 9.9% 11,191K 25.1% 4.0%6 3.5% 94.7% 10.0% 13,020K 16.4% 5.3%7 3.7% 94.2% 10.0% 15,022K 15.4% 5.8%8 3.8% 95.3% 10.0% 16,914K 12.6% 4.7%9 3.8% 95.2% 10.0% 19,101K 12.9% 4.8%
10 3.7% 94.2% 9.9% 20,700K 8.4% 5.8%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Year
0M
5M
10M
15M
20M
25M
Close Ratio1-PersistencyGainPremium
![Page 15: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Scenario 2: Modest Acquisition – Breakeven Scenario 2: Modest Acquisition – Breakeven Pricing, 10% increase on renewals (Max of 3)Pricing, 10% increase on renewals (Max of 3)Scenario 2: Modest Acquisition – Breakeven Scenario 2: Modest Acquisition – Breakeven
Pricing, 10% increase on renewals (Max of 3)Pricing, 10% increase on renewals (Max of 3)
YearClose Ratio Persist Gain Premium Growth 1-Persistency
1 7.9% -0.9% 3,619K2 7.3% 91.7% 1.9% 6,778K 87.3% 8.3%3 7.3% 83.7% 4.3% 9,546K 40.8% 16.3%4 7.5% 86.4% 6.6% 12,865K 34.8% 13.6%5 7.5% 81.4% 7.9% 14,222K 10.5% 18.6%6 7.6% 79.1% 8.0% 15,738K 10.7% 20.9%7 7.4% 77.9% 8.3% 16,192K 2.9% 22.1%8 7.4% 75.4% 7.7% 16,696K 3.1% 24.6%9 7.4% 80.7% 7.9% 18,101K 8.4% 19.3%
10 7.6% 81.5% 8.1% 18,910K 4.5% 18.5%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Year
0M
5M
10M
15M
20M
25M
Close Ratio1-PersistencyGainPremium
![Page 16: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Model Variance: 1000 simulationsModel Variance: 1000 simulationsModel Variance: 1000 simulationsModel Variance: 1000 simulations
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
6.0%
6.5%
7.0%
7.5%
60M 80M 100M 120M 140M
Premium
Gai
n
Gain: Standard Deviation = 15.8%
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
-40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Premium: Standard Deviation = 4.9%
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
-40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
![Page 17: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Scenario 3: Aggressive Acquisition – Priced at Scenario 3: Aggressive Acquisition – Priced at a Loss, 20% increase on renewals (Max of 2)a Loss, 20% increase on renewals (Max of 2)
Scenario 3: Aggressive Acquisition – Priced at Scenario 3: Aggressive Acquisition – Priced at a Loss, 20% increase on renewals (Max of 2)a Loss, 20% increase on renewals (Max of 2)
YearClose Ratio Persist Gain Premium Growth 1-Persistency
1 10.4% -5.7% 4,558K2 10.1% 85.6% -2.2% 8,191K 79.7% 14.4%3 10.2% 74.2% 0.4% 10,853K 32.5% 25.8%4 10.2% 73.3% 2.1% 13,223K 21.8% 26.7%5 9.8% 69.3% 2.6% 13,741K 3.9% 30.7%6 10.2% 72.8% 2.9% 14,666K 6.7% 27.2%7 10.0% 71.5% 3.1% 15,787K 7.6% 28.5%8 10.2% 70.1% 2.3% 16,309K 3.3% 29.9%9 10.2% 70.9% 1.9% 16,830K 3.2% 29.1%
10 10.0% 72.0% 1.5% 17,663K 5.0% 28.0%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Year
0M
5M
10M
15M
20M
25M
Close Ratio1-PersistencyGainPremium
![Page 18: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Scenario 4: Moderate Acquisition Pricing – Scenario 4: Moderate Acquisition Pricing – Two rate increases limited to 5%Two rate increases limited to 5%
Scenario 4: Moderate Acquisition Pricing – Scenario 4: Moderate Acquisition Pricing – Two rate increases limited to 5%Two rate increases limited to 5%
YearClose Ratio Persist Gain Premium Growth 1-Persistency
1 7.0% 2.3% 3,533K2 6.5% 94.9% 3.7% 6,608K 87.0% 5.1%3 6.6% 93.5% 5.0% 10,095K 52.8% 6.5%4 6.3% 88.8% 6.3% 13,194K 30.7% 11.2%5 6.5% 90.9% 7.3% 15,552K 17.9% 9.1%6 5.6% 88.9% 8.5% 17,450K 12.2% 11.1%7 5.0% 86.5% 9.3% 18,485K 5.9% 13.5%8 5.2% 88.4% 9.9% 19,914K 7.7% 11.6%9 5.2% 86.6% 10.4% 21,002K 5.5% 13.4%
10 5.0% 89.0% 10.8% 22,226K 5.8% 11.0%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Year
0M
5M
10M
15M
20M
25M
Close Ratio1-PersistencyGainPremium
![Page 19: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Scenario 5: Classic Underwriting CycleScenario 5: Classic Underwriting CycleScenario 5: Classic Underwriting CycleScenario 5: Classic Underwriting Cycle
YearClose Ratio Persist Gain Premium Growth 1-Persistency
1 10.4% -5.1% 4,437K2 10.0% 94.1% -5.9% 8,171K 84.1% 5.9%3 9.9% 95.5% -3.5% 12,587K 54.0% 4.5%4 3.3% 87.3% 5.8% 12,792K 1.6% 12.7%5 3.2% 76.1% 12.2% 11,461K -10.4% 23.9%6 3.3% 72.7% 14.9% 10,059K -12.2% 27.3%7 8.7% 75.2% 7.0% 11,975K 19.0% 24.8%8 8.6% 85.3% 4.4% 15,157K 26.6% 14.7%9 8.5% 88.5% 3.8% 17,957K 18.5% 11.5%
10 5.1% 84.6% 7.1% 18,966K 5.6% 15.4%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Year
0M
5M
10M
15M
20M
25M
Close Ratio1-PersistencyGainPremium
![Page 20: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Scenario ComparisonScenario ComparisonScenario ComparisonScenario Comparison
Annual Premium
0M
1M
1M
2M
2M
3M
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Years
TargetBreakevenAggressiveModerate AcquisitionUnderwriting Cycle
Sold Margin
-6%
-1%
4%
9%
14%
19%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Years
TargetBreakevenAggressiveModerate AcquisitionUnderwriting Cycle
![Page 21: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Scenario Comparison: Results from Years 6-10Scenario Comparison: Results from Years 6-10Scenario Comparison: Results from Years 6-10Scenario Comparison: Results from Years 6-10
1 Priced at Target: No increase on renewal 5 Underwriting Cycle2 Priced at break even: 10% increase on renewal 6 Increasing Rates3 Priced at a loss: 20% increase on renewal 7 Decreasing Rates4 Initially priced below target: 5% increase on renewal 8 Low rates
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
70M 75M 80M 85M 90M 95M 100M 105M 110M 115M 120M
5 Yr Premium
5 Y
r G
ain
4
6
3
2
5
17
8
![Page 22: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Impact of Rate GuaranteeImpact of Rate GuaranteeImpact of Rate GuaranteeImpact of Rate Guarantee
Annual Premium
0M
5M
10M
15M
20M
25M
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Years
1 Yr Guarantees
2 Yr Guarantees
Sold Margin
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Years
1 Yr Guarantees
2 Yr Guarantees
![Page 23: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ObservationsObservationsObservationsObservations
Caveat: Model is simple and may not reflect actual Caveat: Model is simple and may not reflect actual marketplace dynamicsmarketplace dynamics
Adequate stable pricing produces better long-term resultsAdequate stable pricing produces better long-term results
Acquisition Pricing: Lower persistency keeps long-term Acquisition Pricing: Lower persistency keeps long-term premium growth low, especially after more than one premium growth low, especially after more than one increaseincrease
Best results from slightly low prices followed by modest Best results from slightly low prices followed by modest increases (if early below-target profit can be afforded!)increases (if early below-target profit can be afforded!)
![Page 24: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Discussion PointsDiscussion Points
Model Assumptions vs. Today’s LTD Model Assumptions vs. Today’s LTD MarketplaceMarketplace
How Best To Operate In This Environment?How Best To Operate In This Environment?
![Page 25: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Discussion Points -- MarketplaceDiscussion Points -- Marketplace
Start-Up Blocks vs. Ongoing BlocksStart-Up Blocks vs. Ongoing Blocks
Expense RatiosExpense RatiosGrowth TargetsGrowth TargetsCurrent Year Results vs. Rolling AveragesCurrent Year Results vs. Rolling AveragesTrends in ResultsTrends in Results
![Page 26: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Discussion Points -- MarketplaceDiscussion Points -- Marketplace
Constant Risk Dynamics vs. Constant Risk Dynamics vs. Trends in Claim CostsTrends in Claim Costs
Aging Population Aging Population Leveraging of Social Security OffsetsLeveraging of Social Security OffsetsObesityObesityEconomic FactorsEconomic Factors
![Page 27: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Discussion Points -- MarketplaceDiscussion Points -- Marketplace
Other Carriers’ PhilosophiesOther Carriers’ Philosophies
Stable and Rational?Stable and Rational?Throw in a New Entrant?Throw in a New Entrant?Aggressive Growth Goals?Aggressive Growth Goals?
![Page 28: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Discussion Points -- ExecutionDiscussion Points -- Execution
New Business Pricing ProcessNew Business Pricing Process
Underwriter DiscretionUnderwriter DiscretionSales Office Pricing PoolsSales Office Pricing PoolsUpdating Manual Rate BasisUpdating Manual Rate BasisGrey Areas in Manual RatesGrey Areas in Manual RatesCredibility and Experience RatingCredibility and Experience Rating
![Page 29: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Discussion Points -- ExecutionDiscussion Points -- Execution
Implementing Rate IncreasesImplementing Rate Increases
Developing the Renewal StrategyDeveloping the Renewal StrategyRate Increases Targeted at Block Level or Case Rate Increases Targeted at Block Level or Case
Level?Level?Segmenting the BusinessSegmenting the Business
• Differences By Case Size?Differences By Case Size?• SIC Categories?SIC Categories?• Voluntary vs. Non-Contributory? Voluntary vs. Non-Contributory?
What to do with Rate Decreases? What to do with Rate Decreases?
![Page 30: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Discussion Points -- Execution Discussion Points -- Execution
Aligning The OrganizationAligning The Organization
UnderwritingUnderwriting• Objectives at Department or Employee Level?Objectives at Department or Employee Level?• Which Metrics to Use?Which Metrics to Use?
SalesSales• Compensated Based on Persistency?Compensated Based on Persistency?• Compensated Based on Profitability?Compensated Based on Profitability?
ActuarialActuarial
![Page 31: Rick Leavitt, Smith Group Steve Rulis, Munich American Re Session 103F: Group Disability Forum Anaheim Spring Meeting May 21, 2004 Modeling Alternative](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022070305/5513f3d655034674748b5d6e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Discussion Points -- Execution Discussion Points -- Execution
Measuring The ResultsMeasuring The Results
What Types of Experience Reports?What Types of Experience Reports?Beware of the Vanishing Rate Increase!Beware of the Vanishing Rate Increase!What if Rate Increases Achieved But What if Rate Increases Achieved But
Earnings Objectives Not Met?Earnings Objectives Not Met?