right-sizing hospital units and nurse staffing -...
TRANSCRIPT
Eugene Litvak, Ph.D.
Institute for Healthcare Optimization
www.ihoptimize.org
Pat Rutherford, RN, MS
Institute for the Healthcare Improvement
April 6, 2016
Right-sizing Hospital Units
and Nurse Staffing
This presenter has nothing
to disclose.
Session Description
Characteristics such as patient-per-nurse staffing ratio and nurse hours per patient day has been demonstrated to be a major, determinant of quality of care and patient safety. They dramatically affect hospital-acquired infections, patient experience, mortality, readmissions, etc.
Operations Management tools such as Queuing Models make it possible for organizations to predict and manage the variability of random patient demand, generally associated with clinically-driven patient needs. These tools allow managers to make informed judgments on the resource capacity needed to serve variable demand flows, such as in different medicine services. This session will explore how to properly allocate the number of beds across units and how to optimize staffing to achieve the desired level of service to improve operational, financial, and clinical performance.
Session Objectives
After this session, participants will be able to:
Describe how the understanding of queuing theory
enables operation management teams to plan for
staffing and bed/unit needs
Identify the importance of “right-sizing” hospital units
and nurse staffing levels to ensure patient safety
3
4
Nurse Staffing….
Why should we care about it
and what should we do about it?
Staffing Ratios and Adverse Events
Recent studies show that lower nurse-to patient
staffing ratios are associated with higher rates
of adverse events, including:
• Nosocomial infections (e.g. UTI, post-op infection, and pneumonia)
• Pressure ulcers
• Cardiac and respiratory failure and “failure to rescue”
• Increased length of stay
Aiken et al, 2002; Needleman et al, 2002; Seago, 2001 and Kovner, 2002
Nurse Staffing and
Patient Outcomes in Hospitals
This study found statistically significant relationships between nursestaffing variables and the following patient outcomes in acute care :
• Medical Patients: urinary tract infection, pneumonia, shock,upper gastrointestinal bleeding, length of stay
• Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: urinary tract infection, pneumonia, failure to rescue (defined as the death rate among patients with sepsis, pneumonia, shock, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or deep vein thrombosis)
High RN staffing associated with 3-12% decrease in likelihood of events, high total nursing staffing associated with 2-25% decrease
No effects of staffing on mortality in either medical or surgical patients
Main Analyses involved 1997 discharges from 799 hospitals across 11 states (AZ, CA, MA, MD, MI, NV, NY, SC, VA, WI, WV
Needleman, Buerhaus, et al. (2001). Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes in Hospitals. Report available at www.hrsa.gov/dn
Hospital Nurse Staffing, and Patient Mortality,
Nurse Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction
University of Pennsylvania study: 10,000 nurses and 230,000
patients from 168 hospitals in Pennsylvania from 1998-1999.
For each additional patient assigned to a nurse findings showed:
• 30-day patient mortality increases by 7%
• failure-to rescue rates increase by 7%
• the odds of nursing job dissatisfaction increase by 15%
• the odds of nurse burnout increase by 23%
If nurses had eight patients instead of four, their patients had a
31% higher chance of dying within 30 days of admission.
43% of the nurses surveyed were burned out and emotionally
exhausted.
Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM Sochalaski J, Silber JH (2002) Hospital nurse
staffing, and patient mortality, nurse burnout and job dissatisfaction JAMA, 288(16)
1987-1993).
Summary of Issues
The issues of acuity and the need for more flexibility in determining staffing levels need to be considered
The idea of mandating more nurses at the bedside won’t necessarily make that a reality
Complexity of variables which effect the nurse-to-patient ratios make it difficult for researchers to the determine optimal nursing levels
Increasing staffing ratios without other improvements in the work environment and in processes of care is unlikely to dramatically improve the quality and safety of patient care
Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research Sean Clarke, RN, PhD,
CRNP, CS, Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, Associate Director
Nurse Staffing and Hospital Mortality
In this retrospective observational study, staffing of RNs below target levels was associated with increased mortality, which reinforces the need to match staffing with patients' needs for nursing care
For hospitals that generally succeed in maintaining RN staffing levels that are consistent with each patient's requirements for nursing care, this study underscores the importance of flexible staffing practices that consistently match staffing to need throughout each patient's stay
Our findings suggest that nurse staffing models that facilitate shift-to-shift decisions on the basis of an alignment of staffing with patients' needs and the census are an important component of the delivery of care.
We also found that the risk of death among patients increased with increasing exposure to shifts with high turnover of patients. Staffing projection models rarely account for the effect on workload of admissions, discharges, and transfers
Nurse Staffing and Inpatient Hospital Mortality, Needleman J.,
Buerhaus P., et al. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:1037-1045, March 17, 2011
9
Why redesign work on nursing units?
Nurses spend 31-44% of their time in direct patient care activities
Nurses experienced an average 8.4 work system failures per 8-hour shift
Medications
Orders
Supplies
Staffing
Equipment
Nurses spend 42 minutes of each 8-hour shift resolving operational failures
….and we are experiencing a nursing shortage!!!
Anita L. Tucker and Steven J. Spear, Operational Failures and Interruptions in
Hospital Nursing, Health Research and Educational Trust, 2006, pp. 1-20.
Improve the Work Environment through
Physical Space Design
Streamline and standardize supplies and
equipment throughout the unit.
Relocate essential supplies and equipment near
or in patients’ rooms.
Decentralize nursing workstations and pods.
Organize just-in-time supplies for special
treatments and procedures so that staff do not
have to hunt and gather.
Rutherford P, Bartley A, Miller D, et al. Transforming Care at the Bedside How-to
Guide: Increasing Nurses’ Time in Direct Patient Care. Cambridge, MA: Institute
for Healthcare Improvement; 2008. Available at www.IHI.org.
Eliminate Waste and Redesign Key Processes
on Medical and Surgical Units
Admission Processes– Admission Team Trio at ThedaCare
Discharge Processes– “Ticket Home” at Virginia Mason
Medication Administration
– Locate Meds in or Near Patient Rooms
Handoffs and inter-professional team communications
Routine Care– Intentional Rounding
Rutherford P, Bartley A, Miller D, et al. Transforming Care at the Bedside How-to
Guide: Increasing Nurses’ Time in Direct Patient Care. Cambridge, MA: Institute for
Healthcare Improvement; 2008. Available at www.IHI.org.
Demand/Capacity Management
Time
# o
f P
ati
en
ts
Time
# o
f P
ati
en
ts
Eugene Litvak, PhD, Institute for Healthcare Optimization
What nurse staffing is needed to consistently
provide safe and quality care?
14
Example
Assumptions: 200 surgical beds
average census for surgical beds 160
staffing level 40 nurses (1 nurse per 4 patients)
average residual from 160 patients census is 20% or 32
patients
patients are distributed evenly between the nurses
How the mortality rate will change with 20%
increase in surgical demand?
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
15
Results
• 32 additional patients will be distributed evenly between
32 nurses: 1 additional patient per nurse or 4 + 1 = 5
patient per nurse
• these 32 nurses now will take care of 160 patients,
whose mortality rate increases by 7%
• if these additional 32 patients will be distributed evenly
between 16 nurses, then each such nurse will take care
of 4 + 2 = 6 patients
• these 16 nurses now will take care of 96 patients,
whose mortality rate increases by 14%
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
16Adoption of National Quality Forum Safe
Practices by Magnet Hospitals
Maintaining higher affordable nurse
staffing levels is only possible by
managing variability in patient flow
Jayawardhana, Jayani PhD; Welton, John M. PhD, RN; Lindrooth, Richard PhD,
Journal of Nursing Administration: September 2011 - Volume 41 - Issue 9, pp 350-356
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
17
Variability and health care-associated infection
Jeannie P. Cimiotti DNS,RN, Linda H. Aiken PhD, Douglas M. Sloane PhD, Evan S. Wu, BS
American Journal of Infection Control: August 2012- Volume 40, pp 486-490
“There was a significant association between patient-to-nurse ratio
and urinary tract infection (0.86; P ¼ .02) and surgical site infection
(0.93; P ¼ .04). In a multivariate model controlling for patient severity
and nurse and hospital characteristics, only nurse burnout remained
significantly associated with urinary tract infection (0.82; P ¼.03) and
surgical site infection (1.56; P <.01) infection. Hospitals in which
burnout was reduced by 30% had a total of 6,239 fewer infections, for
an annual cost saving of up to $68 million.”
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
18
Variability and Quality of Care*
Inadequate numbers of nursing staff contribute
to 24% of all sentinel events in hospitals.
Inadequate orientation and in-service education
of nursing staff are additional contributing
factors in over 70% of sentinel events
* Dennis S. O’Leary, - former President JCAHO (personal communication)
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
19
Variability and Readmissions I
Does variability affect readmission rate?
“The odds of one or more discharges becoming an unplanned
readmission within 72 hrs were nearly two and a half times higher on
days when ≥9 patients were admitted to the neurosciences critical care
unit …” *
“The odds of readmission were nearly five times higher on days when
≥10 patients were admitted …” *
* Baker, David R. DrPH, MBA; Pronovost, Peter J. MD, PhD; Morlock, Laura L. PhD, et al. Patient flow
variability and unplanned readmissions to an intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine: November
2009 - Volume 37 - Issue 11 - pp 2882-2887
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
20
Variability and Readmissions II
Hospital Nursing and 30-Day Readmissions Among Medicare Patients With Heart Failure, Acute
Myocardial Infarction, and Pneumonia. McHugh, Matthew D. PhD, JD, MPH, RN; Ma, Chenjuan PhD,
RN. Medical Care: January 2013 - Volume 51 - Issue 1 - p 52–59
“Each additional patient per nurse in the average
nurse’s workload was associated with a 7%
higher odds of readmission for heart failure, 6%
for pneumonia patients, and 9% for myocardial
infarction patients ”.
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
21
• Quality and Safety Corner at www.ihoptimize.org
• The Institute for Healthcare Optimization’s approach to
managing variability in healthcare delivery addresses
some of the most intractable quality and safety issues
such as readmissions, mortality, infections, ED boarding
and others. Learn more »
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
22
What is easier:
to talk to your colleagues or to your lawyers?
http://www.nhmedmallawyer.com/blog/post/show/hospital-staffing-
and-its-effect-on-quality-care
http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/LED-269595/PDH-
Understaffing-a-Possible-Factor-in-Deaths-at-CRMC##
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
Nurse Staffing, Hospital Operations, Care
Quality, and Common Sense
1. Staff hospitals 24/7 according to the peaks in both bed
occupancy and admissions.
2. Be "creative" by introducing dynamic PNRs that will
fluctuate in a synchronous manner with census and
admissions
3. Legislate PNRs
4. Preserve the status quo and do nothing.
5. Change hospital patient flow management.
Litvak E, Laskowski-Jones,L; Nurse staffing, hospital operations, care
quality, and common sense; Nursing, August 2011.
24
Rapid Response Team
Does the Rapid Response Team helps at your hospital?
Why?
Litvak E, Pronovost PJ. Rethinking rapid response teams. JAMA. 2010;304(12):1375–6.
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=186602
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
25
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
IHO Variability Methodology®
http://www.ihoptimize.org/what-we-do-approach.htm
Managing Unnecessary Variability in
Patient Demand
Surgical Demand:Perform Phase 1 and Phase 2
Establish a compliance committee
Medical demand: Develop a consensus on Admission-Discharge-Transfer
(ADT) criteria.
Establish a compliance committee
Litvak E, Buerhaus PI, Davidoff F, Long MC, McManus ML, Berwick DM. “Managing
Unnecessary Variability in Patient Demand to Reduce Nursing Stress and Improve Patient
Safety,” Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient safety, 2005; 31(6): 330-338.
27
How to determine the number of beds
needed
28
Phase III
Determination of Bed
And Staffing needs
Expected Benefits
• Further decreases in patient wait times where they exist
• Further enhancement of patient placement
• Decrease in staffing expense
• Enhanced utilization of existing resources
• Accurate determination of capacity growth need (Additional Med/Surg bed
requires ≈ $1- 3 million in capital cost + over $.25 - .$8 million annual
operational cost)
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
Right-Sizing Hospital Units
Unscheduled (medical and emergent/urgent
surgical) and scheduled (mostly surgical)
patients should be provided with separate bed
capacities
Capacity for the unscheduled demand should be
determined by Queuing Theory modeling
Capacity for scheduled demand could be
determined by computer simulation modeling
29
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
Right-Sizing Hospital Units
Average utilization of beds for scheduled
admissions could potentially be ≥ 90%
The rule of thumb for the average utilization of
beds for scheduled admission is ≈ 80%. Why?
30
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
How High Could Your Hospital bed occupancy
(census) Be (unscheduled patients only)?
Demand
Waiting time
80% utilization
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
Flex Capacity to Meet Seasonal, Day of the Week and
Hourly Variations in Demand
Can you predict a surge in admissions for patients with
medical conditions in the winter months?
Use seasonal flex units to manage increases in medical
patients during the winter months
Can you anticipate which units need more bed capacity?
(clue – which services consistently have a large number of
“off-service patients)
Use data analytics to quantify needs of each service
Do you have a regular surge of activity mid-week with the
hospital census regularly reaching >95% occupancy?
Smooth elective surgical schedules (particularly for patients who
will require ICU care post-op)
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
What should we do?
1. Streamline medical and surgical flow as discussed this
morning.
2. Perform Phase III of the IHO Variability Methodology® :
3. Apply Queuing Theory to determine capacity for
medical and other unscheduled demands (surgical,
Cath. Lab, transfers).
4. Use computer simulation to determine capacity for
elective patient demand. The results of such simulation
should be validated
33
© Institute for Healthcare Optimization 2016
James M. Anderson Center
For
Health Systems Excellence
Getting the Nursing Part Right
Nurse Staffing and Hospital Mortality
•Tertiary Medical Center – 197,691 patients, 176,696 RN shifts, 43 hospital units
•Relationship between nurse staffing and patient turnover
• Risk of Death 2-3 % for each below target shift
• Risk of Death 4-7 % for every high turnover shift • Admissions, discharges, and transfers
• Risk of Death 12 % for each below target shift
• Risk of Death 15 % for every high turnover shift
•Independent Variables when considering risks
Needleman J. et al. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1037-45.
ICU
Patient
Non-ICU
Patient
1st 5 days
LOS
James M. Anderson Center
For
Health Systems Excellence
Staffing and Environment
Nurse Staffing and Hospital Mortality / Failure to Rescue
•Effect of Nurse / Staffing Ratio on Mortality and Failure to Rescue is
directly related to team work environment
•Education Effect–10% BSN educated RN’s 4% mortality
•Lowering the patient-to-nurse ratio – effect of environment
• Marked improvement – good environment
• Modest improvement – fair environment
• No effect – poor environment
•Better environments lower mortality at all hospitals…but
• Poorly staffed hospitals - 2-3% improvement
• Best staffed hospitals - 12% – 14%
Aiken L. et al. Med Care 2011;49:1047-1053.
James M. Anderson Center
For
Health Systems Excellence
Staffing Prediction – Proactive Planning
• Data to Front Line Leaders – Updated daily
• Right Staff for the Right Patients
• Correct Number and Competency
• Flexible with Changing Environment
• Prediction of Needs – Be Prepared – Be Resilient
James M. Anderson Center
For
Health Systems Excellence
James M. Anderson Center
For
Health Systems Excellence
Predicting Unit Census vs Actual Census
James M. Anderson Center
For
Health Systems Excellence
Stressed Microsystems : Objectives
Quantitative metrics and qualitative measures indicative of
microsystem stress
Describe mitigation strategies at the unit, microsystem and
organizational levels to prevent serious harm and other
types of poor outcomes in stressed systems.
Discuss a systematic approach to predict stressed
microsystems.
Mitigate
Predict
James M. Anderson Center
For
Health Systems Excellence
Microsystem Stress Report
Microsystem Stress Report
Week of: 2/28/16 to 3/5/16
Loca
tio
n
Un
it P
op
ula
tio
n
Cap
acit
y
% B
ud
gete
d O
ccu
pan
cy
Demand - Occupancy Capacity - Staffing CN Assessment
Bu
dge
ted
AW
C
AW
C
% O
ccu
pan
cy T
o
Bu
dge
ted
AD
C
% O
ccu
pan
cy t
o C
apac
ity
FY1
6 B
ud
gete
d B
edsi
de
Car
e N
HP
PD
Act
ual
Ave
rage
Dir
ect
Car
e N
HP
PD
Var
ian
ce t
o D
irec
t C
are
NH
PP
D
% V
aria
nce
of
Dir
ect
Car
e N
HP
PD
% O
per
atio
nal
Vac
an
cy
Ho
urs
of
Flo
at
Staf
f
% F
loa
t St
aff
Ho
urs
Ori
enta
tio
n
% O
rien
tati
n H
ou
rs
# o
f >1
3 h
ou
r Sh
ift
% 1
3 h
ou
r Sh
ifts
% O
ran
ge S
hif
ts
% R
ed S
hif
ts
% O
ran
ge a
nd
Red
Sh
ifts
A3N Surgery 22 76.4% 16.8 13.1 78.2% 59.7% 12.5 15.9 3.4 27.5% 22.82% 94.1 10.7% 160 18.2% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
A3S TCC 24 91.7% 22.0 23.1 105.2% 96.4% 17.8 14.1 -3.7 -20.5% 20.56% 188.0 11.2% 221 13.2% 2 1.1% 35.7% 2.4% 38.1%
A4C1 Rehab 12 68.3% 8.2 11.1 135.3% 92.5% 18.2 9.0 -9.2 -50.5% 7.66% 155.4 29.4% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 4.8% 0.0% 4.8%
A4N Transplant/Surgery 24 79.2% 19.0 18.5 97.1% 76.9% 15.2 14.1 -1.1 -7.4% 1.37% 5.0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
A4S GI/Colorectal 24 79.2% 19.0 19.3 101.4% 80.3% 13.6 11.9 -1.7 -12.3% 8.18% 38.2 3.4% 213 19.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
A5C Hem/Onc 32 88.4% 28.3 29.2 103.3% 91.4% 17.6 15.8 -1.8 -10.0% 0.00% 380.6 15.7% 115 4.7% 1 0.4% 2.4% 7.1% 9.5%
A5S BMT 36 83.1% 29.9 32.5 108.7% 90.3% 19.9 16.5 -3.3 -16.7% 23.64% 328.2 11.5% 288 10.1% 4 1.4% 19.0% 4.8% 23.8%
A6C Cardiology 17 88.2% 15.0 13.9 92.4% 81.5% 17.9 15.9 -2.0 -11.0% 5.03% 84.9 7.0% 72 5.9% 7 5.9% 2.4% 0.0% 2.4%
A6N Adol. Medicine 24 75.0% 18.0 20.9 116.0% 87.0% 13.6 9.1 -4.5 -33.2% 0.00% 39.3 3.5% 12 1.1% 1 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
A6S Child Medicine 24 75.0% 18.0 20.1 111.5% 83.6% 13.3 11.1 -2.2 -16.3% -9.83% 84.1 6.9% 32 2.6% 5 3.5% 11.9% 0.0% 11.9%
A7C1 Complex Pulmonary 11 78.2% 8.6 10.2 118.5% 92.6% 12.5 10.5 -2.0 -15.8% 20.19% 157.0 25.1% 0 0.0% 2 2.8% 7.1% 7.1% 14.3%
A7C2 CRC/Diabetes 11 79.1% 8.7 9.7 111.5% 88.2% 10.7 8.5 -2.2 -20.3% 11.14% 0.0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
A7NS Neurosciences 41 70.7% 29.0 31.9 110.1% 77.9% 16.1 12.9 -3.3 -20.2% 6.02% 215.9 11.5% 144 7.7% 9 4.5% 4.8% 0.0% 4.8%
B4 NICU 59 89.5% 52.8 56.9 107.7% 96.4% 18.2 14.6 -3.6 -19.9% 8.56% 761.7 14.3% 456 8.6% 18 3.4% 21.4% 4.8% 26.2%
B5CA Complex Airway 11 66.4% 7.3 7.8 107.0% 71.0% 16.9 14.3 -2.6 -15.4% 16.52% 24.9 5.0% 32 6.4% 0 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 2.4%
B5CC PICU 35 77.1% 27.0 29.8 110.2% 85.0% 26.3 23.9 -2.4 -9.2% 20.26% 489.4 11.6% 648 15.3% 6 1.4% 45.2% 26.2% 71.4%
B6HI CICU 25 74.8% 18.7 18.1 96.6% 72.3% 25.3 25.2 -0.1 -0.4% 11.86% 36.4 1.5% 595 25.0% 2 0.9% 2.4% 0.0% 2.4%
Total 432 80.2% 346.3 366.0 105.7% 84.7% 3083.1 10.4% 2988 10.1% 58 1.9% 9.4% 3.1% 12.5%
Status Criteria
Red< 90%;
> 105%< -5% > 12% > 15% > 10 %
Yellow90% - 95%;
100% - 105%
Green 95% - 100%
James M. Anderson Center
For
Health Systems Excellence
Inpatient Indicators of Stressed System
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Inpatient Indicators
% Occupancy to Capacity (< 85 %)
% Occupancy To Budgeted AWC (< 105%)
% Variance of Direct Care NHPPD (> - 5%)
% Operational Vacancy (< 12%)
% Float Staff Used (< 15%)
% Orange and Red Shifts (< 10%)