right sizing transportation investments · belt from this tod •dart will use this commitment as...

36
RIGHT SIZING TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS AMPO September 29, 2018

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

RIGHT SIZING TRANSPORTATION

INVESTMENTS

AMPOSeptember 29, 2018

Right Sizing

• Definition – the right size, which you know it when you see it!

• LOCAL: The Community weighs in to provide feedback for calibrating the local opportunity to the regional investment.

• REGIONAL: Making something the right size to respond efficiently and effectively.

US 75 @ Walnut Hill Lane – 1959

Source:

texasfreeway.com

US 75 @ Walnut Hill Lane – 1989

Source: texasfreeway.com

US 75 @ Walnut Hill Lane – 2029?

Source: steer.ru

Cotton BeltFort Worth, Texas

• Fort Worth to DFW Airport

• Approved for Construction

• FTA $500 Million Full Funding Grant Agreement with local match

• DFW Airport to Plano/Richardson

• Constructed via a DART Design Build Contract

• Some Value Capture Funding

Sample Station Area

9

Criteria Value

County Collin

Station Area (Acres) 370

Development/Redevelopment Share 50.10%

Total New Population 4,430

Total New Employment 4,958

2009 Property Value $179,963,197

Land Use Pattern Acres Begin Year Duration

Transit Oriented Development 40 5 20

Traditional Neighborhood Development 20 10 15

Transition 0 0 0

Retail 30 10 15

Office 20 10 20

Suburban Multi-Family 0 0 0

C&I 75 10 15

Other 0 0 0

TOTAL 185

What Is Value Capture?

• Several Means• Incremental Land Value Increase

• Incremental Tax-base Growth

• Advertising Revenues

• Other economic value drivers

• Key Components• Local Jurisdiction Approval

• Developer Support

Sample Station Area

Bush/CityLine-State Farm Today

• More than 3 Million SF developed with almost 8,000 jobs

• 10% of Tax Increment committed to Cotton Belt from this TOD

• DART will use this commitment as part of Design-Build funding

High-Speed Rail Station Area PlanningFort Worth, Arlington, and Dallas, Texas

Right Sizing High-Speed Rail

17

Image courtesy of Alamy

Shinkansen N700 HSR

18

Study Area and Draft Alignment Options

Station Area Studies• Coordination With Texas Central Partners (TCP)

• Dallas Station Location Identified By TCP

• Monitoring Westward Alignment Opportunities

• Coordination Efforts• City and County Elected Officials

• Property Owners/Developers

• Business Leaders

• TxDOT

• FWTA and DART

• NCTCOG Alignment Analysis

• Identify Preferred Station Location

• Results Serve As Input Into Environmental Process

Fort Worth Station Areas

Study Conducted for the City of Fort Worth

Study Efforts

Analyzing Possible Station Locations

Completed Stakeholder Input Meetings

City of Fort Worth and Tarrant County Elected Officials

Fort Worth Housing Solutions (Butler)

Sundance Square and Downtown Business Leaders

Trinity Metro

Coordinating with NCTCOG Alignment Analysis

20

Fort Worth Station Location Criteria

Alignment Options

Land Availability and Ownership

Existing Infrastructure Compatibility

Environmental Justice

Station Area Context

Public Plan Consistency

Partnership Potential

Economic Development Opportunities

Mobility Plan Policies and Recommendations

Fort Worth Station Location Criteria

E. ITC – 127

G. Central Rail – 121

F. East Sundance – 115

C. Southside – 96

A. Butler – 89

D. T&P – 86

B. East Lancaster – 81

Rightsizing for High-Speed Rail

• Instead of requiring thousands of parking spaces at the ITC for the future station, NCTCOG allowed Trinity Metro, the City and the consultant team Gateway Planning to assume a 500-space need due to future transit connectivity and autonomous vehicle impacts

Dallas CityMAPDallas, Texas

NCTCOG Role with CityMAP

• Provided tools

• Provided data

• Attended coordination meetings

• Need recommendations from others

Dallas CityMAP – Regional to Local

• How a TxDOT funded local initiative has regional implications

• Economic development, community development and value capture from the highway corridors through downtown

• Right size roadway design to capture the most potential for both regional commute and local development context

I-345/I-45 Remove Scenario

Remove & Replace

Scenario

I-345/I-45 Remove Scenario

I-345/I-45 Remove Scenario

I-30 Canyon

Compressed

I-30 Canyon Compressed Scenario

I-30 Connectivity & Complete Streets Opportunities

Conclusion

• Listen To Partners and Stakeholders

• Right-sizing Transportation Tied to Land Use

• Important To Get It Right-sized

• Don’t Forget Public Transportation!!

Questions?

Kevin Feldt

Program Manager

[email protected]

(817) 704-2529

Mo

bilit

y 2

04

5

Kelsey Berry

Principal

[email protected]

(214) 529-7430