rigid plastic packaging container (rppc) informational update
DESCRIPTION
Rigid Plastic Packaging Container (RPPC) Informational Update. Permitting and Compliance Committee Meeting February 17, 2009. Current RPPC Law Addresses:. Resource conservation Plastic packaging diversion Supporting postconsumer material (PCM) markets - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Rigid Plastic Packaging Container (RPPC)
Informational Update
Permitting and Compliance Committee Meeting
February 17, 2009
Current RPPC Law Addresses:Resource conservationPlastic packaging diversionSupporting postconsumer material (PCM)
marketsSupporting plastic collection and processing
infrastructureCompliance and enforcement
Definition of a RPPCA RPPC
Plastic packagingRelatively inflexible, finite shape or formMinimum capacity 8 fluid ounces (or
equivalent volume)Maximum capacity 5 fluid gallons (or
equivalent volume)Capable of holding its shape while
holding other products
Definition of a RPPC (cont’d.)Regulated RPPCs do NOT include rigid plastic containers that:Are shipped outside California and remain
with the products shippedContain drugs, medical devices, or
cosmeticsContain food (including medical food and
infant formula)
Definition of a RPPC (cont’d.)Regulated RPPCs do NOT include rigid plastic containers that:Contain insecticides, fungicides and rodenticidesFederal law prohibits from containing used material and are used for shipping hazardous or toxic materials
6
Definition of RPPC
NotRegulated Regulated
Maintains its shape while holding other products
“
Maintains its shape while holding other
productsDoes not maintain its shape while holding other products
Regulated
Compliance OptionsProduct manufacturers are responsible for
demonstrating compliance upon notification by the Board
RPPCs shall, on average, meet one of several compliance options:Be made from 25% post consumer
material; orHave a 45% recycling rate (using
methods specified in regulations); or
Compliance Options (cont’d.)Be a reusable package or refillable
package; orBe a source reduced container; orContain floral preservative and
subsequently be reused by the floral industry for at least two years; or
Meets the alternative compliance option for manufacturers under the same corporate ownership.
Typical Certification Cycle100 companies notified of certification cycle
and due date for certification forms.Staff analyzes submitted information.Companies notified of results of staff analysis.Board considers potential penalties for
companies that do not comply with RPPC requirements.
RPPC Enforcement
Certification Cycles Penalties
1997 - 2000 (Combined)
2001
2005
$67,859.00
$121,109.01
$126,375.84 (to date)
Background for Regulations Revisions
• Inequities in process/regulated products• Informal rulemaking stakeholder workshops held
in 2006 and 2007• Identified issues with existing regulations• Identified issues with statute
• Major stakeholder groups include:• Product manufacturers• Plastic recyclers• Container manufacturers• Environmental groups
Background for Regulations Revisions (cont’d.)
• In November 2007, Board directed staff to:• Start the formal rulemaking process; and• Delay new certification cycle until the Board
adopts revised regulations that address issues.
Issues/Concerns Being Addressed by Rulemaking
Modify key definitionsAdd 2006 statutory compliance option –
alternative container complianceAdd pre-certification notification processAdd process to obtain advisory opinions
on whether containers are regulated
Changes in Key Definitions
• Postindustrial plastic: Can no longer be credited as postconsumer plastic
• Product Manufacturer: Factors for identifying who is responsible
15
Inequities in the Regulations:
The “Manufactured for...by....” statement can create an unlevel playing field for similar packaging:•Product manufacturers using this type of label transfer RPPC compliance responsibility to others;•Product manufacturers not using this type of label on identical/similar container are responsible for RPPC compliance;•Board cannot require overseas container manufacturers to meet requirements;•Increase in number of imported products/containers over time.
Changes in Key Definitions (cont’d.)• Definition of a RPPC
At least one closure vs. multiple closures
Caps, lids, handles may be non-plastic vs. all plastic containers
17
Inequities in the Existing Regulations:
18
Inequities in the Existing Regulations:
Changes in Key Definitions (cont’d.)
• Source Reduction: Resin switching not allowed as compliance
option
Alternative Container ComplianceMethods (Added)
2006 statute change -- California PCM used in other products or packaging may be credited toward the RPPC PCM content when it contains a minimum of 25% PCM
PCM generated in California is exported/used to make an equivalent product or packaging; or
Other plastic products or plastic packaging not subject to the RPPC law.
Pre-Certification Process (Added)
Product Manufacturers will be notified almost 2 years in advance of possible certification:• Allows companies time to review
requirements and achieve compliance without threat of immediate penalties
Advisory Opinions Process (Added)
Establishes a process for a manufacturer to request an advisory opinion from the Executive Director whether a container is a regulated RPPC
Stakeholder Issues/Concerns Regarding Statute
Stakeholders raised concerns regarding statute that are outside the scope of regulations revisions:Postconsumer material does not include postindustrial
material (materials generated from, and reused within, the original manufacturing process)
25% postconsumer material requirement is too stringent
Concentration of product(s) is included in the definition of source reduction
Current Status of Formal Rulemaking
High staff turnover has delayed development of materials to start the formal rulemaking process
Timeline
Conduct Economic and Fiscal Analysis• Survey/data
collection• Final analysis
February 2009February 2009
Timeline (cont’d.)Obtain Control Agency
Approvals of Economic and Fiscal Analysis• Air Resources Board• Cal EPA• Department of Finance
March 2009April 2009May 2009
Timeline (cont’d.)Submit formal
rulemaking package to Office of Administrative Law (OAL)
Begin 45-Day Comment Period
Hearing at end of 45-day comment period
June 2009
June-July 2009
August-September 2009
Summary•Proposed changes to regulations will:• Help “level the playing field”• Divert RPPCs from disposal• Support collection infrastructure and
markets for postconsumer material• Establish procedures to improve the
compliance process