risk and worry as predictors of cancer screening behavior: results using hints data richard p....

14
Predictors of Cancer Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Results Using HINTS Data Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1 , Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. , Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2 , , Ellen Peters, Ph.D. Ellen Peters, Ph.D. 3 , Wendy Nelson, Ph.D. , Wendy Nelson, Ph.D. 1 , , Stephen Marcus, Ph.D. Stephen Marcus, Ph.D. 1 1 NCI NCI 2 North Dakota State University North Dakota State University 3 Decision Research/University of Oregon Decision Research/University of Oregon HINTS Data Users Conference January 21, 2005

Upload: shanon-franklin

Post on 29-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Risk and Worry as Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS DataResults Using HINTS Data

Richard P. Moser, Ph.D.Richard P. Moser, Ph.D.11, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D., Kevin McCaul, Ph.D.22,,

Ellen Peters, Ph.D.Ellen Peters, Ph.D.33, Wendy Nelson, Ph.D., Wendy Nelson, Ph.D.11,,

Stephen Marcus, Ph.D.Stephen Marcus, Ph.D.11

11NCI NCI 22North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota State University

33Decision Research/University of OregonDecision Research/University of Oregon

HINTS Data Users Conference

January 21, 2005

Page 2: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

The Role of SusceptibilityThe Role of Susceptibility• Key concept in Health Belief ModelKey concept in Health Belief Model• A A cognitioncognition; can be assessed in several ways (Weinstein ; can be assessed in several ways (Weinstein

et al.) e.g.:et al.) e.g.:– Risk:Risk: Comprehension of the Comprehension of the likelihood likelihood

(probability/chance) of developing a disease(probability/chance) of developing a disease• As As affectaffect

– Importance in decision making (Loewenstein et al., Importance in decision making (Loewenstein et al., 2001)2001)

– Worry:Worry:• Signifies importanceSignifies importance• Serves as salient reminder through ruminationServes as salient reminder through rumination• Motivates planningMotivates planning

• Both related to cancer screening (e.g., McCaul et al., Both related to cancer screening (e.g., McCaul et al., 1996)1996)

Page 3: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Health Behavior Outcomes: Health Behavior Outcomes: Cancer ScreeningCancer Screening• Reduces disease-related morbidity and mortalityReduces disease-related morbidity and mortality• Increases cancer survival rates for certain types of Increases cancer survival rates for certain types of

cancercancer• ACS/USPSTF Current screening guidelinesACS/USPSTF Current screening guidelines• Coded for analyses:Coded for analyses:

– Regular/Not RegularRegular/Not Regular•Mammography (Breast)Mammography (Breast)•FOBT (Colorectal)FOBT (Colorectal)

– Lifetime (Yes/No)Lifetime (Yes/No)•SigmoidoscopySigmoidoscopy•ColonoscopyColonoscopy•PSAPSA

Page 4: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Analysis PlanAnalysis Plan• Hierarchical Logistic RegressionHierarchical Logistic Regression

– Predictors of interest-three blocks:Predictors of interest-three blocks:• 1) Sociodemographic variables1) Sociodemographic variables

– Gender (where appropriate)Gender (where appropriate)– EducationEducation– Race/EthnicityRace/Ethnicity– AgeAge

• 2) Access to Care2) Access to Care– Health care coverageHealth care coverage– Regular providerRegular provider

• 3) Risk, Worry and interaction3) Risk, Worry and interaction

• OtherOther– Log likelihood analyses for nested modelsLog likelihood analyses for nested models– Correlate risk/worryCorrelate risk/worry

Page 5: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Results: Correlations Between Results: Correlations Between Cancer Risk and Worry*Cancer Risk and Worry*

• Breast Cancer: Breast Cancer: r r ==.42.42

• Colorectal Cancer: Colorectal Cancer: r r ==.37.37

• Prostate Cancer: Prostate Cancer: r r ==.34.34

*all significant at *all significant at pp < .05 < .05

Page 6: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Distribution of Risk/Worry Distribution of Risk/Worry ResponsesResponses

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Risk of Breast Cancer

VERY LOWSOMEWHAT LOWMODERATESOMEWHAT HIGHVERY HIGH

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Risk of Colon Cancer

VERY LOWSOMEWHAT LOWMODERATESOMEWHAT HIGHVERY HIGH

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Worry of Breast Cancer

RARELY OR NEVERSOMETIMESOFTENALL THE TIME

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Worry of Colon Cancer

RARELY OR NEVERSOMETIMESOFTENALL THE TIME

Page 7: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Distribution of Risk/Worry Distribution of Risk/Worry Responses (cont.)Responses (cont.)

0

10

20

30

40

50

Risk of Prostate Cancer

VERY LOW SOMEWHAT LOW MODERATESOMEWHAT HIGH VERY HIGH

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Worry of Prostate Cancer

RARELY OR NEVER SOMETIMES OFTEN ALL THE TIME

Page 8: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Variable OR 95% CI Log LikelihoodRisk 1.18 1.04 to 1.33Worry 1.30 1.03 to 1.63Risk x Worry 0.97 0.82 to 1.16

Regular Provider Yes 2.81 1.95 to 4.06 No 1.00 ---Health Care Coverage Yes 2.59 1.72 to 3.88 No 1.00 ---

Age 1.01 1.00 to 1.02Education College Grad 2.17 1.41 to 3.33 Some College 2.12 1.37 to 3.30 High School Grad 1.71 1.07 to 2.73 Less than High School 1.00 ---Race/Ethnicity Other 1.05 0.77 to 1.43 White 1.00 ---

Outcome: Regular/Not Regular Mammography Screening (n=2150)

(p < .01)

(p < .01)

Page 9: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Variable OR 95% CI Log LikelihoodRisk 1.16 0.99 to 1.35 (p<.06)Worry 1.32 1.03 to 1.69Risk x Worry 0.94 0.80 to 1.11

Regular Provider Yes 1.86 1.35 to 2.55 No 1.00 ---Health Care Coverage Yes 1.31 0.60 to 2.83 No 1.00 ---

Age 1.03 1.02 to 1.05Education College Grad 2.90 1.87 to 4.51 Some College 2.55 1.70 to 3.82 High School Grad 1.21 0.79 to 1.85 Less than High School 1.00 ---Race/Ethnicity Other 0.91 0.62 to 1.35 White 1.00 ---Gender Male 1.38 1.05 to 1.82 Female 1.00 ---

Outcome: Ever/Never Sigmoidoscopy Screening (n=2078)

(p < .01)

(p < .01)

Page 10: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Variable OR 95% CI Log LikelihoodRisk 1.23 1.09 to 1.38Worry 1.43 1.09 to 1.88Risk x Worry 0.94 0.80 to 1.11

Regular Provider Yes 1.89 1.28 to 2.78 No 1.00 ---Health Care Coverage Yes 2.15 1.34 to 4.08 No 1.00 ---

Age 1.03 1.02 to 1.05Education College Grad 1.05 0.65 to 1.70 Some College 1.06 0.69 to 1.64 High School Grad 0.93 0.64 to 1.35 Less than High School 1.00 ---Race/Ethnicity Other 0.90 0.62 to 1.29 White 1.00 ---Gender Male 1.25 0.97 to 1.61 Female 1.00 ---

Outcome: Ever/Never Colonoscopy Screening (n=2079)

(p < .01)

(p < .01)

Page 11: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Variable OR 95% CI Log LikelihoodRisk 0.88 0.73 to 1.05Worry 1.00 0.70 to 1.42Risk x Worry 1.12 0.90 to 1.41

Regular Provider Yes 1.72 1.05 to 2.82 No 1.00 ---Health Care Coverage Yes 1.83 0.71 to 4.74 No 1.00 ---

Age 1.01 1.00 to 1.03Education College Grad 1.26 0.77 to 2.05 Some College 1.27 0.73 to 2.18 High School Grad 1.14 0.75 to 1.73 Less than High School 1.00 ---Race/Ethnicity Other 1.28 0.87 to 1.87 White 1.00 ---Gender Male 1.13 0.84 to 1.51 Female 1.00 ---

Outcome: Regular/Not Regular FOBT Screening (n=1878)

(Not significant)

(p < .01)

Page 12: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

Variable OR 95% CI Log LikelihoodRisk 1.07 0.86 to 1.34Worry 1.33 0.81 to 2.17Risk x Worry 0.88 0.56 to 1.40

Regular Provider Yes 3.64 2.02 to 6.57 No 1.00 ---Health Care Coverage Yes 3.15 1.07 to 9.31 No 1.00 ---

Age 1.06 1.02 to 1.11Education College Grad 0.81 0.30 to 2.21 Some College 0.91 0.33 to 2.54 High School Grad 2.06 0.74 to 5.74 Less than High School 1.00 ---Race/Ethnicity Other 0.73 0.36 to 1.49 White 1.00 ---

Outcome: Ever/Never PSA Screening (n=617)

(Not significant)

(p < .01)

Page 13: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

SummarySummary• Both risk and worry are important Both risk and worry are important

predictors of some types of cancer predictors of some types of cancer screeningscreening

• Seem to operate independently; no Seem to operate independently; no interactioninteraction

• No curvilinear relationship with worryNo curvilinear relationship with worry• Do not predict FOBT/PSA screening; Do not predict FOBT/PSA screening;

why not?why not?

Page 14: Risk and Worry as Predictors of Cancer Screening Behavior: Results Using HINTS Data Richard P. Moser, Ph.D. 1, Kevin McCaul, Ph.D. 2, Ellen Peters, Ph.D

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

•Kevin Dodd, Ph.D.Kevin Dodd, Ph.D.

•Lila Finney Rutten, Ph.D., Lila Finney Rutten, Ph.D., M.P.H.M.P.H.

•Helen Meissner, Ph.D.Helen Meissner, Ph.D.