rob connell may 29, 2002 retail sub-committee update

19
Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

Upload: anne-west

Post on 18-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

Rob ConnellMay 29, 2002

Retail Sub-Committee Update

Page 2: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

2

Objectives

• Update on PTB Synchronization Plan– Status on synchronizing the CR of record

• Provide Update from Previous RMS issues– Portal Performance and Changes– IDR / Non IDR Meter Usage Reports– 867-03 Forwarding Updates

• Information on Enhanced MP EDI Reporting Effort

Page 3: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

3

PTB Synchronization Plan

• To address the current market issue with the rep of record getting out of synch between ERCOT, TDSP and CR systems.

• The transition to AREP process identified some of these, and the Move In and Move Out “safety net” processes, market gaps and various system issues have caused many more.

• The objectives of this project are to provide a plan to; – Identify the size of the problem – Provide root causes and options for correcting (if available)– Develop and implement a technical plan to synchronize databases

• The Non-PTB (Over 1 MW) ESI Ids are being addressed through another process

.

Page 4: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

4

Market Synchronization Update

• RMS synchronization plan was approved at TAC unanimously

• Kick off Conference Call meeting took place 5/21

a) Minutes distributed 5/22

• Most TDSPs and CRs have identified at least one business and one technical contact to work with ERCOT

• All parties agreed to action plan:

a) Each MP will ensure internal/provider systems are synchronized

b) A test run will occur to ensure queries and file layout are correct

c) This test run begins on May 29th and will complete by June 7th

Page 5: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

5

PTB Synchronization Plan - Next Steps

• Market continues to support plan with appropriate technical and business resources being assigned.

• Test files will be processed by ERCOT and finalize format and comparison programs verified.

• ERCOT will work with MPs to correct any file format issues.

• Pull together a detailed project plan to evaluate differences at a point in time and document steps required to correct

• Full data send/analysis will take place once test run is complete

• Report through RMS

Page 6: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

6

Questions

Page 7: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

7

Portal Performance History (Find ESI IDs) May 29, 2002

Total hits per week

Unsuccessful hitsWeek By Week ESIID Hits Versus Errors

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

W/E1/5

W/E1/12

W/E1/19

W/E1/26

W/E2/2

W/E2/9

W/E2/16

W/E2/23

W/E3/2

W/E3/9

W/E3/16

W/E3/23

W/E3/30

W/E4/6

W/E4/13

W/E4/20

W/E4/26

W/E5/4

W/E5/10

W/E5/18

W/E5/24

Week Ending

Hit

s

24% 14% 31% 22% 26% 28% 16% 5% 13%18% 11% 22% 9%13% 14% 25% 15% 14% 7% 9% 13%

Page 8: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

8

Portal Performance Items

• Mux E Way fix from Seebeyond on week of 3/30– Saw a temporary 7 % improvement

• Moved Portal E Ways to New Hardware week of 4/13– Saw a temporary 10 % improvement

• Added components (threads) on 4/25– Showed some very promising improvements

• Additional Architecture change was made 5/21– Removed TCH component competing with batch transactions– Seeing a 30% improvement in errors– Also added “heartbeat” functionality to verify EAI every minute

• Looking at 2 additional improvements currently being tested– Moving Siebel queries directly to Oracle– Improvements in redundancy for find transactions

• Future options also being evaluated– Additional redundant paths for Portal transactions– Continue to analyze errors and respond

Page 9: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

9

Questions

Page 10: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

10

IDR Meter Usage Report (data submitted 8 weeks following Trade date)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Market CPL Reliant TNMP Oncor WTU

% ID

R in

Lod

esta

r

12-Oct-01

7-Dec-01

1-Feb-02

29-Mar-02

26-Apr-02

24-May-02

Page 11: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

11

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

8/3 8/17 8/31 9/14 9/28 10/12 10/26 11/9 11/23 12/7 12/21 1/4 1/18 2/1 2/15 3/1 3/15 3/29 4/12 4/26 5/10 5/24

Date

Per

cen

t

Market

CPL

Reliant

TNMP

Oncor

WTU

IDR Meter Usage Report (as of 5/28/02)Percent of IDR accounts received by ERCOT since August

* NOTE: ERCOT (and REPs) may have received additional non-sequential data (i.e, February data before January data). ERCOT rejects all meter reads that introduce gaps in the database

95% or better expected

63%

Page 12: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

12

NIDR Meter Usage Report Percent of NIDR accounts received by ERCOT since August

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

8/3 8/17 8/31 9/14 9/28 10/12 10/26 11/9 11/23 12/7 12/21 1/4 1/18 2/1 2/15 3/1 3/15 3/29 4/12 4/26

Last Read Greater Than

Per

cen

tag

e

Market Apr-2002

Market Feb-2002

Market Jan-2002

Market Dec-2001

Market May-2002

95% or better expected

Page 13: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

13

Questions

Page 14: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

14

867-03 Forward Update

• Data Provided on Existing MP Reports will allow reconciliation

Page 15: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

15

867-03 Forward Update

• ERCOT Data for May 1 to May 26, 2002

– 5,557,189 Usage transactions received at ERCOT

– 99.91% forwarded, 5,551,739 transactions

– 5,776 Not forwarded due to invalid forwarding Duns numbers

Page 16: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

16

867-03 Forwards – Sample Timings

RUN_DATE TRANS_TYPE TPTNER_ID TRANS_NO Transaction Mapping Status SIID

CPL to ERCOT (AES is FWD Receiver) - Inbound Time of Processing 2:20 PM 5/1/2002ERCOT to AES - Outbound Time of Processing 3:22 PM 5/1/2002

5/1/2002 3:22:02 PM 867_03 8797234681000 946160330020020430221752521940 Accept 10032789481815780

5/1/2002 2:20:51 PM 867_03 007924772 946160330020020430221752521940 Accept 10032789481815780

TNMP to ERCOT (REL RETAIL is FWD Receiver) - Inbound Time of Processing 7:53 AM 5/2/2002ERCOT to REL RETAIL - Outbound Time of Processing 8:13 AM 5/2/2002

5/2/2002 8:13:16 AM 867_03 799530915 20020502867000033 Accept 10400514015920001

5/2/2002 7:53:06 AM 867_03 007929441 20020502867000033 Accept 10400514015920001

REHLP to ERCOT (CALPINE is FWD Receiver) - Inbound Time of Processing 9:48 PM 5/3/2002ERCOT to CALPINE - Outbound Time of Processing 10:16 PM 5/3/2002

5/3/2002 10:16:10 PM 867_03 1127108761000 REL86703A20020501202634 Accept 1008901000140140013100

5/3/2002 9:48:53 PM 867_03 957877905 REL86703A20020501202634 Accept 1008901000140140013100

CPL to ERCOT (CORAL POWER is FWD Receiver) - Inbound Time of Processing 11:30 PM 5/4/2002ERCOT to CORAL POWER - Outbound Time of Processing 11:44 AM 5/4/2002

5/4/2002 11:44:50 AM 867_03 9375172661000 944084541020020503223704326835 Accept 10032789412332150

5/4/2002 11:30:05 AM 867_03 007924772 944084541020020503223704326835 Accept 10032789412332150

CPL to ERCOT (DYNEGY is FWD Receiver) - Inbound Time of Processing 12:56 PM 5/10/2002ERCOT to DYNEGY - Outbound Time of Processing 2:20 PM 5/10/2002

5/10/2002 2:20:41 PM 867_03 009924445 943008693020020509230139716714 Accept 10032789483089721

5/10/2002 12:56:53 PM 867_03 007924772 943008693020020509230139716714 Accept 10032789483089721

Page 17: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

17

867-03 Forwarding

• ERCOT believes we are forwarding all 867s that have forwarding information provided

• ERCOT provides 867 forwarding information on the current MP reports to facilitate reconciliation

• ERCOT samples of turn around time are well within protocols

• Next Steps– Should point to point 867 continue?– If MPs believe ERCOT is not properly forwarding 867-03s, provide

Examples for ERCOT to check

Page 18: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

18

Questions

Page 19: Rob Connell May 29, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update

19

Questions