robert m. hirsch, research hydrologist, usgs september 6, 2012 nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Robert M. Hirsch,Research Hydrologist, USGSSeptember 6, 2012
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay in Tropical Storm Lee, 2011 – results and implications
![Page 2: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Photo credit: NASA MODIS, Sept. 13, 2011
![Page 3: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Susquehanna RiverAs a % of ChesapeakeBay inputs
47% of freshwater
41% of nitrogen
25% of phosphorus
27% of sediment
![Page 4: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Premise of this study•The reservoirs have been a major trap for nutrients and sediment
•Some time in the future, they will reach equilibrium and no longer serve as a trap
•Analysis of recent data, especially high flow events, can inform us about this transition
![Page 5: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Source: Langland, 2009 http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5110/
![Page 6: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Predictions by Langland and Hainly (1997)
Reservoirs would be “full” in 17 to 20 years
And all other things being equal
TN flux would increase 2%TP flux would increase 70%SS flux would increase 250%
![Page 7: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Black dots are pre-2000, Red are since 2000
![Page 9: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Use the WRTDS (Weighted Regressions on Time, Discharge and Season) method to describe the evolving behavior of Total Nitrogen
![Page 10: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Annual FluxIn 103 tons/yr
2011 = 1352010 = 502004 = 135
Flow NormalizedFlux ChangeSince 1996-3.2%
![Page 11: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Take home messages: TN•Total Nitrogen concentrations are continuing to decline at most discharges.
•But at very high flows they are showing some increase.
•Flow-normalized flux continues to fall. Down about 16% since its high in 1987.
•Year to year variability in actual TN flux is increasing (standard deviation about double for 2002-2011 vs. 1978-2001).
![Page 12: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Let’s look at the full history of Total Phosphorus data collected from the USGS RIM station at Conowingo Dam
![Page 13: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Black dots are pre-2000, Red are since 2000
![Page 14: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Use the WRTDS model to describe the evolving behavior of Total Phosphorus
![Page 15: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
AnnualFluxIn 103 tons/yr
2011=172010= 22004= 8
FlowNormalizedFluxUp 55%Since 1996
![Page 16: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Take home messages about TP•Concentrations are relatively stable at moderate and low flows
•But at very high flows they have increased greatly in the past 15 years
•Flux continues to rise – and is becoming more and more episodic
•These changes almost certainly are related to the decreasing capacity of Conowingo Reservior
![Page 17: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Suspended Sediment
Highest, Hurricane Ivan, 2004, 3685 mg/L 2nd highest,
T.S. Lee, 2011, 2980 mg/L
![Page 18: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Black dots are pre-2000, Red are since 2000
![Page 19: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Use the WRTDS model to describe the evolving behavior of suspended sediment(note log scale on vertical axis)
![Page 20: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Annual Fluxin106 tons/yr
2011 = 242010 = 12004 = 12
FlowNormalizedFlux ChangeUp 97%Since 1996
![Page 21: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Take away message for Suspended Sediment
•Flow-normalized flux is rising very steeply
•Variability increasing
![Page 22: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Hypothesis:
• As the reservoirs fill, for any given discharge, there is less cross-sectional area, resulting in greater velocity
• This leads to a decrease in the scour threshold (more frequent scour)
• This also leads to a decrease in the amount of deposition at lower discharges
![Page 23: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Prediction: Without dredging, reservoir output must equal input
Langland and Hainley’s 1997 prediction of change in flux
Observed change in flux since 1996
TN +2% -3.2%
TP +70% +55%
SS +250% +97%
![Page 24: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
What does this all mean for the Bay?
• Trapping of TP and SS is decreasing. Scour is becoming more frequent and larger
• Increasing role of high flow events for TN, TP, and SS inputs to the Bay.
• “Filling” is asymptotic and stochastic. We are well into the transition to “full.”
• Over the coming decades, the state of the reservoirs may be the main driver of TP & SS inputs from the Susquehanna.
![Page 25: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Next phase of work, already underway
Above Below
![Page 26: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Next phase of work, already underway
![Page 27: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Next phase of work, already underway
![Page 28: Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062222/5697c0231a28abf838cd3e5a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Photo credit: Wendy McPherson, USGS, September 12, 2011
Loss of trapping efficiency is not just a future issue it is a “now” issue