robert porjesz - coimce.com
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
© 2014 BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE: BY ACCEPTING THIS DOCUMENT, THE RECIPIENT AGREES THAT THE DOCUMENT TOGETHER WITH ALL INFORMATION INCLUDED THEREIN IS THE
CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED AND INCLUDES VALUABLE TRADE SECRETS AND/OR PROPRIETARY INF ORMATION OF BAKER HUGHES (COLLECTIVELY " INFORMATION"). BAKER HUGHES RETAINS ALL RIGHTS
UNDER COPYRIGHT LAWS AND TRADE SECRET LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND OTHER COUNTRIES. THE RECIPIENT FURTHER AGREES TH AT THE DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE DISTRIBUTED, TRANSMITTED, COPIED OR REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR
IN PART BY ANY MEANS, ELECTRONIC, MECHANICAL, OR OTHERWISE, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF BAKER HUGHES, AND MA Y NOT BE USED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN ANY WAY DETRIMENTAL TO BAKER HUGHES’ INTEREST.
Seismic reservoir characterisation
Unconventional reservoir (shale gas)
Robert Porjesz
![Page 2: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Overview
Introduction
Conventional seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Unconventional (azimuthal) seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Integration with – Quantitative mineralogy
– Microseismic
Financial impact/concluding thoughts
![Page 3: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Overview
Introduction
Conventional seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Unconventional (azimuthal) seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Integration with – Quantitative mineralogy
– Microseismic
Financial impact/concluding thoughts
![Page 4: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Introduction
Reservoir modelling/drilling plan, operational decision making
– Without seismic
Actual data
Model data
<25%
![Page 5: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Introduction / objectives
Actual data
Model data
<5%
Reservoir modelling/drilling plan, operational decision making
– With seismic
![Page 6: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Introduction
Seismic reservoir characterisation
No seismic
With seismic
But not only seismic
![Page 7: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Shale Gas in the US – Extensive drilling
Since 1997, more than 13,500 gas wells completed in the Barnett shale
![Page 8: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
Jan-81 Jan-83 Jan-85 Jan-87 Jan-89 Jan-91 Jan-93 Jan-95 Jan-97 Jan-99 Jan-01 Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09 Jan-11 Jan-13
Ma
xim
um
ga
s 6
mo
. p
rod
uctio
n (
MC
F)
Date
Horizontal Vertical Directional
The shale learning curve
Barnett Shale Development
Multistage
Completions
![Page 9: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
70% of unconventional wells in the U.S.
do not reach their production targets.*
60% of all fracture stages
are ineffective.**
73% of operators say they do not know
enough about the subsurface*
*Source: Welling & Company, 2012 **Source: Hart’s E&P, 2012
Uncertainty
9
![Page 10: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Shale resources are not homogenous
Shale development is capital-intensive
Lateral wells with multi-stage completions are expensive
Economic success rates are low with current approaches
Stimulation requires a significant amount of water
We can’t drill everywhere
The need for Shale Science
DRILL / COMPLETE SMART
![Page 11: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Shale Play Seismic Characterization in a nutshell
Shale Characterization
How will the fractures propagate ?
Is the rock brittle ? “Brittleness”
Stress
Reservoir Quality
Gas in Place Porosity Saturation TOC
y = -0.061x + 2.6671R² = 0.6511
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Bul
k D
ensi
ty (G
RI),
g/c
c
Total Organic Carbon (TOC), wt %
BASIC ROCK PROPERTIES(GRI Method)
All JIP Wells
Johnson Trust 1 #2 (Bossier)
Johnson Trust 1 #2 (Haynesville)
Johnson Trust 1 #2 (Haynesville Lime)
585 Samples
![Page 12: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Overview
Introduction
Conventional seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Unconventional (azimuthal) seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Integration with – Quantitative mineralogy
– Microseismic
Financial impact/concluding thoughts
![Page 13: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Unconventional reservoir rock physics
What the (seismic driven) rock physics is?
What are the benefits/objectives of applying rock physics analysis for reservoir
modelling?
![Page 14: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Unconventional reservoir rock physics
What the (seismic driven) rock physics is?
Kimmeridge Oil Shale Photo: Dr. Ramues Gallois (2011)
![Page 15: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Unconventional reservoir rock physics
What are the benefits/objectives of applying rock physics analysis for reservoir
modelling?
Kimmeridge Oil Shale Photo: Dr. Ramues Gallois (2011)
![Page 16: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Unconventional reservoir rock physics
What the (seismic driven) rock physics is?
http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Publications/Oil/primer03.html
Pores / Fluid
Rock Matrix
• Rock frame bulk modulus • Porosity • Fluid saturation • Temperature • Pressure • Share modulus • Density • ….
![Page 17: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Unconventional reservoir rock physics
What the (seismic driven) rock physics is?
vp, vs, r
• Rock frame bulk modulus • Porosity • Fluid saturation • Temperature • Pressure • Share modulus • Density • ….
Rock physics
![Page 18: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Unconventional reservoir rock physics
What the (seismic driven) rock physics is?
![Page 19: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Unconventional reservoir rock physics
![Page 20: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Shale Play Seismic Characterization in a nutshell
Shale Characterization
How will the fractures propagate ?
Is the rock brittle ? “Brittleness”
Stress
Reservoir Quality
Gas in Place Porosity Saturation TOC
y = -0.061x + 2.6671R² = 0.6511
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Bul
k D
ensi
ty (G
RI),
g/c
c
Total Organic Carbon (TOC), wt %
BASIC ROCK PROPERTIES(GRI Method)
All JIP Wells
Johnson Trust 1 #2 (Bossier)
Johnson Trust 1 #2 (Haynesville)
Johnson Trust 1 #2 (Haynesville Lime)
585 Samples
![Page 21: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Pre-stack Inversion
)21(3 KEDyn
Stat
Dyn
E
Ek
2
S
P
V
V
22
2
Workflow
• Seismic Data Conditioning • Seismic Interpretation • Well – Seismic Ties • Extract Wavelets • Model Building • Inversion
r
2VP
r
sV
![Page 22: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Pay Probability Map – Haynesville Shale Gas
![Page 23: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Multi Attribute - Production map
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
HIGH
LOW
WPTOC (mean) Lambda Rho (min)
BRITINDX (max) S-impedance (mean)
![Page 24: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Multi Attribute - Production map
WPTOC (mean)
Lambda Rho (min)
BRITINDX (max)
S-impedance (mean)
![Page 25: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
NO
N-E
CO
NO
MIC
Interpolation of Production Values
25
EC
ON
OM
IC
![Page 26: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Calibrated Production Map E
CO
NO
MIC
N
ON
-EC
ON
OM
IC
![Page 27: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Overview
Introduction
Conventional seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Unconventional (azimuthal) seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Integration with – Quantitative mineralogy
– Microseismic
Financial impact/concluding thoughts
![Page 28: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Shale Play Seismic Characterization in a nutshell
Shale Characterization
How will the fractures propagate ?
Is the rock brittle ? “Brittleness”
Stress
Reservoir Quality
Gas in Place Porosity Saturation TOC
y = -0.061x + 2.6671R² = 0.6511
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Bul
k D
ensi
ty (G
RI),
g/c
c
Total Organic Carbon (TOC), wt %
BASIC ROCK PROPERTIES(GRI Method)
All JIP Wells
Johnson Trust 1 #2 (Bossier)
Johnson Trust 1 #2 (Haynesville)
Johnson Trust 1 #2 (Haynesville Lime)
585 Samples
![Page 29: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
13600
13800
14000
14200
14400
14600
14800
15000
0 45 90 135 180
Imp
ed
an
ce
Azimuth
Azimuthal Impedance
P-wave Azimuthal Anisotropy
Azimuth F High
stress
![Page 30: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
AVAz methods:
– The near offset Rüger equation
– Azimuthal Fourier coefficients
– Simultaneous elastic inversion of Fourier Coefficients
Slide 30
Fractured media characterisation
![Page 31: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
AVAz methods:
– The near offset Rüger equation
– Azimuthal Fourier coefficients
– Simultaneous elastic inversion of Fourier Coefficients
Slide 31
Fractured media characterisation
![Page 32: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
A popular method to perform azimuthal AVO is the near offset approximation (Rüger and Tsvankin, 1997)
Where • R(,f): Data for a given angle of incidence and azimuth f • A: Intercept • Biso: Isotropic gradient • Bani: Anisotropic gradient • fiso : Azimuth of isotropy plane
Bani is often associated to the crack density (Hudson et al., 1981) and fiso is the fracture orientation.
Slide 32
fff 22 sin]sin[),( isoaniiso BBAR
The near offset Rüger equation
![Page 33: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
AVAz methods:
– The near offset Rüger equation
– Azimuthal Fourier coefficients
– Simultaneous elastic inversion of Fourier Coefficients
Slide 33
Fractured media characterisation
![Page 34: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
2nd order Fourier coefficients directly
related to the anisotropic gradient Bani
4th order Fourier coefficients provide
additional fracture information
Combination of Fourier coefficients
provide fracture properties
(e.g. weaknesses, compliances) and
unambiguous fracture strike
Azimuthally invariant part contains
both isotropic and fracture properties
(Downton, SEG 2011)
Slide 34
))(4cos())(2cos(),( 420 symsympp rrrR fffff
![Page 35: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
f1
1
2
fN
n
2
1
n 2 1 f2
n
…
1
u2 v2 u4 v4
2
u2 v2 u4 v4
n
u2 v2 u4 v4
…
Azimuthal angle stacks Azimuthal Fourier Coefficients
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5x 10
-3
Am
pli
tud
e
Azimuth (degrees)
Amplitude vs. Azimuth (40 degrees)
![Page 36: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
AVAz methods:
– The near offset Rüger equation
– Azimuthal Fourier coefficients
– Simultaneous elastic inversion of Fourier Coefficients
Fractured media characterisation
![Page 37: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
SEI of azimuthal angle stacks
δT: tangential weakness
δN: normal weakness
Φsym: symmetry axis
TWT, Ip, Is, ρ
δT, δN, Φsym
Inversion minimizes a three term cost function:
f1
1
fN n
2
1
n
f2
n
… 2 1
2 (Downton and Roure, 2010)
f1 f2 fN …
Data misfit Lateral continuity Prior model
![Page 38: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
δT: tangential weakness
δN: normal weakness
Φsym: symmetry axis
g: (Vs/Vp)^2
TWT, g
δT, δN, Φsym
Inversion minimizes a three term cost function:
1
u2 v2 u4 v4
2
u2 v2 u4 v4
n
u2 v2 u4 v4
…
θ1 θ2 θN …
Data misfit Lateral continuity Prior model
(Roure and Downton, 2012)
SEI of Fourier coefficients
![Page 39: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Interpretation Crossplot
Static Young’s Modulus
H- h
H
Zone 1: Ductile (RED) Zone 2: Aligned Fractures (YELLOW) Zone 3: Hydraulic Fractures (GREEN) Zone 4: Transition (GREY)
Dif
fere
nti
al H
ori
zon
tal S
tres
s R
atio
![Page 40: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Plate orientation: direction of H
Combining Stress & Brittleness Seismic Predictions
BRITTLE
Plate size: H
hHDHSR
Young’s Modulus
low
high Hmax
hmin
Hmax
Pressure
hmin = Closure Stress
low high
DHSR
![Page 41: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Predicted average production calibrated to horizontal well length
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
9 10
11
12 13 14
15 16
17
18
20
21
19
22
23 24
25 26
27 28
High
Low
![Page 42: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Overview
Introduction
Conventional seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Unconventional (azimuthal) seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Integration with – Quantitative mineralogy
– Microseismic
Financial impact/concluding thoughts
![Page 43: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Introduction
Seismic reservoir characterisation
No seismic
With seismic
But not only seismic
Quantitative mineralogy
![Page 44: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Cuttings Based Spectral Gamma Curve
75 µm 75 µm
![Page 45: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Well log and XRD lithology with up-scaled and normalized RoqSCAN® carbonate data (X’s)
![Page 46: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Vertical Data Summary Log
Imported logs Comments Siliciclastics &
carbonates
Provenance &
marine
indicators Porosity
data Bulk minerals Heavy
minerals
Roq
SC
AN
SG
R
Re
do
x &
org
anic
pro
xie
s
Ro
qF
RA
C
Cuttings Based Spectral Gamma Curve
![Page 47: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Input to seismic attribute mapping and completions characterization
1000 ft
![Page 48: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
RoqFRAC® (‘Brittleness’ Index) vs. Dynamic Young’s Modulus
![Page 49: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Introduction
Seismic reservoir characterisation
No seismic
With seismic
But not only seismic
Microseismic
![Page 50: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
![Page 51: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
![Page 52: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
![Page 53: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
![Page 54: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Correlation between SRV and Seismic-Derived Attributes
For each stage: 1) Compute SRV 2) Compute average of seismic
attribute inside SRV
Young’s Modulus
SRV
R = 0.68 (76 stages)
DHSR
SRV
R = - 0.60 (76 stages)
![Page 55: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Overview
Introduction
Conventional seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Unconventional (azimuthal) seismic modelling – Reservoir rock physics
– Seismic data for sweet spots
– Sample case history
Integration with – Quantitative mineralogy
– Microseismic
Financial impact/concluding thoughts
![Page 56: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Original 13 stages Frac design and calibrated production map
![Page 57: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Targeted, 9 stages Frac design and calibrated production map
Optimized locations for frac stages
![Page 58: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Well Economics
($10.0)
($8.0)
($6.0)
($4.0)
($2.0)
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
Cu
mu
lati
ve C
ash
Flo
w (
$M
M)
Month
Base Case Test Case 1 Test Case 2
Original design
13 stages
9 stage design vs
original 13 stages
Optimized
9 stage design vs
original 13
![Page 59: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Final comments
The shale reservoir characterization workflow demonstrated
utilizes a combination of detailed well analysis, pre-stack
seismic inversion, and seismic anisotropy.
There is no single silver bullet; multi-attribute analysis is
required.
Validation will help refine seismic processes, mineralogy and
microseismic analysis show promising correlations.
Sweet Spot maps and volumes are statistically derived.
Judicious validation should be applied.
![Page 60: Robert Porjesz - coimce.com](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022011905/61d6ec840b76c2008468c958/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
© 2
014
Bak
er H
ughe
s In
corp
orat
ed. A
ll R
ight
s
Res
erve
d.
Thank you