role of academic medical centers in the national quality ... · mindful variation and reduce...

58
Role of Academic Medical Centers in the National Quality Agenda UC Health and the National Quality Agenda: An Opportunity Dr. Peter Pronovost Director of the Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Senior Vice President of Patient Safety and Quality Johns Hopkins Medical

Upload: others

Post on 19-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Role of Academic Medical Centers in the National Quality Agenda

    UC Health and the National Quality Agenda: An Opportunity

    Dr. Peter Pronovost Director of the Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Senior Vice President of Patient Safety and Quality Johns Hopkins Medical

  • Toward eliminating all harm; the need for new narratives

    Peter Pronovost, MD, PhD, FCCM

    The Johns Hopkins University

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

  • I will …

  • 4

  • Three Narratives that hinder progress

    5

    • Harm is inevitable rather than preventable • Safety is a local project rather than an integrated

    operating management system

    • Safety is based on the heroism of clinicians rather than the design of safe systems

  • New Narrative: Harm is preventable

  • Change in US CLABSI Rates Why did CLABSI Work at Policy Level? ► Reliable and valid measurement

    system ► Evidence-based practices from

    clinical and basic research ► Investment in implementation

    (improvement) science* ► Local ownership (CUSP team)

    and peer learning communities ► Align and synergize efforts of

    many around a common goal and measure

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health

    System 8

    Pronovost; 15 years after to err is human: a success story to learn from; BMJQS 2015 *

  • What did this work at organizational level

    Pronovost J Health Outcomes and Management 2017

  • What did this work at a team and individual level

    Dixon-Woods; Explaining Michigan Milbank Quarterly

  • New Narrative: Safety is an integrated operating management system rather than a project

  • The Armstrong Institute

    12

    • Purpose: To partner with patients their loved ones and others to end preventable harm, continuously improve patient outcomes and experience and eliminate waste

    • Principles • I am humble curious and compassionate • I respect appreciate and help other • I am accountable to continuously improve myself, my organization

    and my community

    • Programs; advance science, build capacity, implement interventions, inform policy

  • High Reliability Organizations

    Photo credit: U.S. Navy

    Pursuit of excellent performance under complex and dynamic conditions

    Weick & Sutcliffe 2015

    13

  • HRO Industries Created Operating Management Systems Unifying framework for structured assurance of safety, quality, reliability

    14

    To assure customer satisfaction, organizations

    must produce, and continually improve, safe, reliable

    products that meet or exceed customer, statutory and

    regulatory requirements.

    Integrated approach for organizational learning and continuous improvement

  • JHM Operating Management System 5 Core Elements

    The Way We Work Together

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

    15

  • Element 1 – Governance, Leadership and Accountability • Can you name the accountable quality leaders for your

    entire delivery system from board to care delivery sites • Can you map the flow of quality measures from the

    care delivery sites up to board • Do you have explicitly defined shared leadership

    accountability processes • Do you have a fractal management structures in which

    each higher level of the organization creates a structure in which each lower level has a voice providing horizontal links for learning and vertical for accountability

    • Do you have a standard framework to organization quality work throughout your delivery system 16 © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins

    Health System

  • Change Progresses at the Speed of Trust

    17 ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY

  • Use the levers and adaptive leadership to strengthen the links

    ResponsibilityRole Clarity

    and Feedback

    Shared Leadership Accountability

    Capacity Time and Resources

    18

    Weaver; J Healthcare Management

  • HEALTH CARE EQUITY

    Framework for Organizing Quality and Safety Work

    19

    LEAN

    Analytics

    Marketing and Communications

    Learning and Development

    PATIENT SAFETY

    EXTERNAL REPORTING

    PATIENT EXPERIENCE VALUE

    Strategic Partnerships

    Research

    Infection Prevention

    MEASURES Risky providers, units & systems WORK CUSP

    Mindful organizing

    Culture measurement improvement

    Event reporting

    Safety case

    MEASURES Survival PSI/HAC HAI Rankings WORK PMO

    Work teams

    Robust Process Improvement

    A3 Project management

    MEASURES CAHPS Narratives Grievances WORK Common language

    PFACs

    Include patients

    Patient and families education

    Care coordination

    Family involved in decision-making

    MEASURES stratified by Race Ethnicity Primary language WORK Measure development

  • Element 2 – Systems Thinking, Risk Identification and Mitigation

    20

    • Do you have mechanisms to identify and mitigate risky providers, units, systems, and management systems

    • Do you have unit based improvement teams (CUSP)

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns

    Hopkins Health System

  • Element 3 – Capacity and Infrastructure

    21

    • Have you defined and ensured capabilities and capacity to eliminate harm, continuously improve outcomes and experience and eliminate waste among all staff, those who manage quality and those who lead quality

    • Have you defined and ensured competencies to prevent the common causes of harm among all staff

    • Have you created an enabling infrastructure to coordinate project managing, learning and development, analytics, improvement science, communications, and research

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

  • Element 4 – Transparency, Communication and Teamwork

    22

    • Do leaders declare and communicate purpose, principles and goals

    • Do leaders create a culture of respect, build trust and instill a hunger to learn and improve

    • Do leaders ensure all staff are respected, have resources and are recognized

    • Do leaders create a culture where all can speak out and up, addressing the “untouchables”

    • Do you create structures and build trust c between upstream and down stream teams

    • Do you implement huddles (daily management) at a unit, department, and organizational levels

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

  • Element 5 – Insight and Innovation • Have leaders created a culture to increase

    mindful variation and reduce mindless variation

    • Have leaders engaged clinicians in clinical communities

    • Have leaders triangulated data and analytics to learn and improve

    • Does the organization at all levels run experiments and learn, including from outside organizations

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

    23

    Knowledge &

    Understanding

    Synthesized Information

    Validated Data

    Noise

    Innovation

  • Clinical Communities Self-governing networks with representation from entire

    health system Led by local physicians (1 academic lead, 1 community lead)

    with interdisciplinary membership that includes patients and families

    Set and communicate clear goals and measures related to purpose

    Armstrong Institute provides vertical support for project management, peer learning, analytics, and robust process improvement

    Work collaboratively on quality improvement projects, empowered to make changes

    24

  • Clinical Communities

    25

    ▪ Joint Replacement ▪ Blood Management ▪ Spine ▪ Surgery ▪ Cardiac Surgery ▪ ICUs ▪ Congestive Heart Failure ▪ Diabetes ▪ Palliative Care ▪ Cardiac Rhythm

    Management

    ▪ Hospitalists (EQUIP) ▪ Stroke ▪ Craniotomy ▪ Psychiatry and

    Behavioral Sciences ▪ Patient and Family

    Centered Care ▪ Patient Centered

    Care/Maternal Health ▪ Cleaning, Disinfection,

    Sterilization ▪ Medication Safety

  • 26

    Red Blood Cell Use in JHHS

  • Red Blood Cell Utilization Rate by Individual Hospitals

    FY 2015

  • 28

    Transfusion in Hip and Knee replacement across JHHS

  • 29

    HIP Volumes JHBMC: 200 cases/year Suburban: 500 cases/year Sibley: 500 cases/year

    KNEE Volumes JHBMC: 300 cases/year Suburban: 900 cases/year Sibley: 500 cases/year

    HIP KNEE

    ~$2,000 per case reduction In variable direct cost at JHBMC

  • Supply Chain Initiatives

    • Spine Vendor capping

    initiative- $3.3 million

    • ICU CVL kits Foley Kits Pharmaceuticals

    • Blood

    Management • $1.3 million

    • Joint Cement- $150,000 Vendor capping

    initiative- $1.5 million

    • Surgery $780,000 savings by

    reducing the number of vendors for sutures and endomechanicals

    Hemostasis

    • Cardiac Surgery Opportunity by

    reducing Nitric oxide usage- $920,000

  • Spine Accomplishments to date: Development and implementation of ACDF

    pathway- LOS

    Current initiatives: Final review and implementation of Lumbar

    Fusion Pathway Development of pathway for deformity

    procedures Partnership with JHHC to develop a bundling

    strategy

    On Pathway Off Pathway

    Ortho 1.63 2.71

    Neuro 1.64 3.95

  • 32

    Colorectal CUSP/ERAS Surgical Site Infection Rate

    ACS-NSQIP data

    Baseline 27%

    Post-ERAS 6%

    Colorectal Operating Room CUSP ERAS

    Hospital Target 15%

    Chart1

    FY 2010

    FY 2011

    FY 2012

    FY 2013

    Q1/2 2014

    Q3/4 2014

    Series 1

    0.27

    0.17

    0.2

    0.16

    0.2

    0.06

    Sheet1

    Series 1

    FY 201027%

    FY 201117%

    FY 201220%

    FY 201316%

    Q1/2 201420%

    Q3/4 20146.00%

    To update the chart, enter data into this table. The data is automatically saved in the chart.

  • 33

    SSI Rates in JHH GYN ONC Colon Cases: 2013 - 2014

    33%

    0%

    25%

    11% 9%

    33%

    Interim Goal 2014 12%

    IMPLEMENTATION OF SSI BUNDLE

  • Narrative 3: Safety is based on design of safe systems

    34

  • Hand Calculations

    Constant False Alarms

    Unreliable Systems

    Devices don’t share data Low Productivity

    ICU Current State

  • Potential of Productivity

    Source: Kellerman, Health Affairs, 2013

  • Harms

    Delirium

    Acquired Physical Impairment

    Ventilator associated infections and harms

    DVT-PE

    CLABSI

    Loss of Respect and Dignity

    Failure to provide care consistent with patient

    goals

    DELIRIUM

    CAM ICU assessments

    Automated screening

    Modifiable factors

    Non-pharmacologic interventions

    Sedation management

    Pain Scores

    Family education

    Acquired Physical Impairment

    Early ambulation

    Adjunctive physical therapy

    Pharmacologic management

    Prospective testing

    Family engagement

    Transition of care planning

    Ventilator Harm

    Daily sedation vacation (SAT)

    Daily spontaneous breathing trials (SBT)

    Automated ventilator management

    Lung Protective Ventilation for ALI

    Low Volume Ventilation if not ALI

    DVT-PE

    Initial VTE risk stratification for all ICU patients

    Computerized clinical decision support (CDS) tool to aid ordering of best-practice VTE

    prophylaxis

    Ongoing risk re-stratification

    Reminders when contraindications change to prompt addition of pharmacologic prophylaxis

    Ultrasound screening of appropriate patients

    Prevent missed prophylaxis doses

    Optimal Mechanical Prophylaxis Use (Sequential Compression Device [SCD] and

    compression stockings [TEDS])

    VAP Head of Bed Elevation (HOB) ( ≥

    30 degrees).

    Spontaneous Awakening and Breathing Trials (SAT & SBT)

    Oral Care

    Oral Care with Chlorhexidine

    Subglottic Suctioning ETTs

    Loss of Respect and Dignity

    Interpersonal communication

    Scheduling

    Education

    Goals alignment

    Access to care team

    Inclusion

    Continuity

    Failure to provide care consistent with patient

    goals Family meetings

    Advanced directives

    All teams meetings

    Ethics engagement

    Palliative Care

    CLABSI

    Hand washing

    Chlorhexidine

    Full Barrier Precautions

    Avoid femoral site

    Remove Unnecessary line

    Use of checklist

    Availability of cart

    Harms to be eliminated – Associated Tasks

  • 2/27/2017 39

    Emerge

  • © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health

    System 40

  • Questions for Discussion

    41

    • What narratives are you telling that are holding you back • Have you declared a goal of eliminating harms • Is quality a project or an integrated management system

    • Does your quality governance structure function with the same rigor as finance

    • Do you have trust building structures that support peer learning and accountability

    • Do you have a common framework for organizing the work throughout your system

    • Have you instilled a culture of respect, trust and learning • Would all your employees answer yes when asked if they are treated with

    respect, have necessary resources, and are recognized • Do all employees feel free to speak up and out • Does all employees feel have a hunger to learn and improve.

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

  • I will …

  • New Narrative: Harm is preventable

  • Slides for Reference

    44

  • • The Board shall ensure that management creates a structure and reporting system such that the Board has oversight for quality and safety of care everywhere that care is delivered within the health system

    • To accomplish this comprehensive oversight, management shall map the delivery system from the Board to the bedside

    Element 1 – Governance, Leadership and Accountability

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

    45

  • • The Board shall ensure that a framework for reporting quality and safety of care mirrors the rigor and comprehensiveness of a consolidated financial statement

    Element 1 – Governance, Leadership and Accountability

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

    46

  • • The Board shall define an accountability system for quality and safety when any part of the organization misses quality goals or has an unacceptable level of risk

    Element 1 – Governance, Leadership and Accountability

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

    47

  • Element 2 – Systems Thinking, Risk Identification and Mitigation

    • Management shall seek to anticipate and prevent mishaps by standardizing work whenever possible

    • Safety culture surveys, event reporting and ”near miss” data shall be continually utilized to inform and develop corrective and preventive actions

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns

    Hopkins Health System 48

    Risky Systems

    Risky Provide

    rs

    Risky Units

    • Risk identification and mitigation shall be informed by triangulated evidence such as indicators of risky providers, units and systems

  • Element 2 – Systems Thinking, Risk Identification and Mitigation

    • Management shall ensure that staff understand the upstream and downstream implications of their work, and partner effectively with colleagues in both directions

    • Unit-based clinical teams shall be created to improve patient safety culture and provide frontline caregivers the tools and support to eliminate harm

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System 49

  • CUSP Growth

    50

    020406080

    100120140160

    Total CUSP Teams at JHM

  • Element 3 – Capacity and Infrastructure • Management shall create a fractal management

    structure for quality in which management defines the delivery system structure and ensures that every higher level of the organization creates a forum in which every lower level helps co-create the quality approach

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

    51

    • Management shall structure a learning model with quality and safety training targeted and tailored systematically for all staff including leadership

    • Clinical staff shall demonstrate skills and competencies to prevent the common causes of preventable harm in their area

  • Element 4 – Transparency, Communication and Teamwork

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

    52

    • Leadership shall establish a Patient and Family Advisory Council with representatives on key quality and safety committees

    • Management shall empower all staff to speak up and stop hazardous conditions to prevent harm and share wisdom to improve patient outcomes and experience

    • Management shall address disruptive staff with no one “untouchable”

    • Leadership shall enact a bundle of human resource practices to recruit, reward and retain staff that embrace the culture of safety and teamwork

  • JHBMC True North Room

    Element 4 – Transparency, Communication and Teamwork

    • Senior leaders shall declare and communicate goals

    • Managers empower staff to speak up and stop hazardous conditions to prevent harm and share wisdom to improve patient outcomes and experience

    • Lean Daily Management strategies shall be employed to support peer learning and accountability

    HCGH Observation Unit

    Sibley Hospital CT

  • Element 5 – Insight and Innovation • Strategies shall be developed to systematically

    promote the realization, preservation, availability and application of new knowledge

    • Management shall create clinical communities to integrate knowledge, standardize practices, promote innovation, efficiency and value

    • An integrated analytics capability shall be created to support improvement work and synthesize information from multiple sources to identify strengths and weaknesses

    © The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System

    54

    Knowledge &

    Understanding

    Synthesized Information

    Validated Data

    Noise

    Innovation

  • Examples of Habits for HRO

    55

    • Habits to anticipate and prevent mishaps through standard work • Observe work; get ground truth daily • Shadow another role • Ask daily, how will this and next patient be harmed • Leaders ask how will operational and financial decisions introduce risks • Leaders ask will all employees say they are are treated with respect by

    everyone, they have the resources and competencies they need and they are recognized

    • Habits to recover from mishaps • Conduct daily rounds • Managers create structures to link up and down stream teams • Leaders create a culture of speaking up and speaking out • Leaders actively seek our new information especially bad news • Leaders address untouchables and disruptive behavior • All build in pause points in confusing situations • All use standard protocols for communicating (STICC

  • References; Patient Harm is Preventable not Inevitable

    56

    1Pronovost et al. Fifteen years after To Err is Human: a success story to learn from. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:396-399. 2Pronovost et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. NEJM 2006;355;2725-2732. 3Bion et al. ‘Matching Michigan’: a 2-year stepped interventional programme to minimize central venous catheter-blood stream infections in intensive care units in England. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:110-123. 4Palomar et al. Impact of a national multimodel intervention to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection in the ICU: the Spanish experience. Crit Care Med 2013;41:2364-2372. 5Lipitz-Snyderman et al. Impact of a statewide intensive care unit quality improvement initiative on hospital mortality and length of stay: retrospective comparative analysis. BMJ 2011;342:d219. 6Dixon-Woods et al. Explaining Michigan: Developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Q 2011;89:167-205.

  • References; Safety is an operating management system

    57

    Pronovost et al. The Armstrong Institute: An academic institute for patient safety and quality improvement, research, training, and practice. Acad Med 2015;90:1331-1339.

    Pronovost et al. Sustaining reliability on accountability measures at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2016;42:51-60.

    Pronovost et al. Creating a high-reliability health care system: improving performance on core processes of care at Johns Hopkins Medicine. Acad Med 2015;90:165-172.

    Mathews et al. A model for the departmental quality management infrastructure within an academic health system. Acad Med 2016 Sep 6 epublication.

    Pronovost et al. Demonstrating high reliability on accountability measures at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2013;39:531-544.

  • Safety is based on design of safe systems

    58

    Pronovost & Bo-Linn. Preventing patient harms through systems of care. JAMA 2012;308:769-770.

    Pronovost et al. From heroism to safe design: leveraging technology. Anesthesiol 2014;120:526-529.

    Romig et al. Developing a comprehensive model of intensive care unit processes: concept of operations. J Patient Saf 2015 Apr 23 epublication.

    Mathews S & Pronovost. The need for systems integration in health care. JAMA 2011;305:934-935.

    Role of Academic Medical Centers in the National Quality AgendaToward eliminating all harm; �the need for new narrativesI will …Slide Number 4Three Narratives that hinder progressNew Narrative: Harm is preventableSlide Number 7Change in US CLABSI RatesSlide Number 9What did this work at a team and individual levelNew Narrative: Safety is an integrated operating management system rather than a projectThe Armstrong InstituteHigh Reliability OrganizationsHRO Industries Created Operating Management Systems�Unifying framework for structured assurance of safety, quality, reliabilityJHM Operating�Management System�5 Core ElementsElement 1 – �Governance, Leadership and AccountabilityChange Progresses at the Speed of TrustShared Leadership AccountabilityFramework for Organizing Quality and Safety WorkElement 2 – Systems Thinking, Risk Identification and MitigationElement 3 – �Capacity and InfrastructureElement 4 – �Transparency, Communication and TeamworkElement 5 – �Insight and InnovationClinical Communities Clinical CommunitiesRed Blood Cell Use in JHHSRed Blood Cell Utilization Rate by Individual HospitalsTransfusion in Hip and Knee�replacement across JHHSSlide Number 29 Supply Chain InitiativesSpineColorectal CUSP/ERAS�Surgical Site Infection RateSSI Rates in JHH GYN ONC Colon Cases: 2013 - 2014Narrative 3: Safety is based on design of safe systemsICU Current StatePotential of ProductivityHarms to be eliminated – Associated TasksSlide Number 38Emerge Slide Number 40Questions for DiscussionI will …New Narrative: Harm is preventableSlides for ReferenceElement 1 – �Governance, Leadership and AccountabilityElement 1 – �Governance, Leadership and AccountabilityElement 1 – �Governance, Leadership and AccountabilityElement 2 – Systems Thinking, Risk Identification and MitigationElement 2 – Systems Thinking, Risk Identification and MitigationCUSP GrowthElement 3 – �Capacity and InfrastructureElement 4 – �Transparency, Communication and TeamworkJHBMC True North RoomElement 5 – �Insight and InnovationExamples of Habits for HROReferences; Patient Harm is Preventable not InevitableReferences; Safety is an operating management systemSafety is based on design of safe systems