rome: republic and early empire, pp. 92-110 · 2010. 3. 8. · head of a roman patrician, from...
TRANSCRIPT
Rome: Republic and Early Empire,
pp. 92-110Roman Heritage:
The power of Technology
Sculpture:
Republican Verism
Augustus and the Greek Model
Iconography
Painting:
Fresco technique
Second Style:
Linear and Atmospheric Perspectives
Architecture:
The temple: Roman Eclecticism
The Pantheon: the dome
A New Building Material: Concrete
Rome is the archetype of the empire
based on rational efficiency and
practical genius
(visually exemplified by the grid
organization of Roman military camps)
Rome success in conquering most of
the known world depended on its
highly organized infrastructures
(streets and aqueducts),
and technological superiority (both in
military and civic terms)
Roman Heritage:
The celebration of Roman achievements both in the civic
and military fields is embodied by the Triumphal Arch
Originally realized to celebrate victorious military
campaigns and the completion of infrastructures such
as bridges or major streets,
it would significantly become a successful symbol of great
accomplishments in Western capitals:
-Rome, honored Titus’s capture of Jerusalem of 70 CE
-Paris, commissioned by Napoleon in 1806 after the victory
of Austerlitz
-New York, celebrated George Washington inauguration as
president of the US at its centennial (1888)
Roman Heritage:
Head of a Romanpatrician, from Orticoli,Italy, ca. 75-50 BC,marble.
Sculpture: Republican Verism
What does this figure tell you?
Why would someone pay a sculptor to have
such a pitiless record of his forefather’s
ugliness?
This kind of portraiture had a specific function
in Roman tradition:
it is related to Roman aristocracy’s cult of
ancestors (patricians kept portrait of their
ancestors in their homes)
and to funerary rituals (they would parade
them in funerary processions)
Head of a Romanpatrician, from Orticoli,Italy, ca. 75-50 BC,marble.
Sculpture: Republican Verism
To own many portraits meant being
descendant of a good lineage
Such meticulous realism is called verism
(from Latin verum = true),
and probably derives from Roman practice of
making death masks of deceased relatives
(these are the true likenesses of my
forefathers!)
But also expresses some fundamental values
of Roman Republican culture
I’m ugly
But I don’t care(actually I’m proud of it)
Because I am
virtuous:
serious, experienced,
determined, and loyal
to family and state
Not only are his wrinkles the physical
demonstration of this person’s virtuosity
and responsibility,
they are also a reflection of the value
placed on age and experience within
Roman culture (minimum age-limit for
holding certain offices)
Head of a Romanpatrician, from Orticoli,Italy, ca. 75-50 BC,marble.
Sculpture: Republican Verism
Scholars have also interpreted the extreme
realism of the late Roman Republic as
politically charged:
a reaction against the Roman craze for Greek
culture
In 221 BC the Romans had conquered the
wealthy Sicilian Greek city of Syracuse and its
artistic patrimony was brought to Rome
In 146 BC Greece had become a Roman
province
The impact on Roman society, culture, and art
was immense
As the biographer Plutarch wrote, the Romans
“who had hitherto been accustomed only to
fighting and farming”
now began “affecting urbane opinions about the
arts and about the artists”
This patrician is defending the good old values
that have made Rome great:
simplicity, practical sense, respect for the aged,
and tradition
Republican verism is in fact the contrary of
Classical Greek idealization,
which celebrates values such as beauty, eternal
youth, divine perfection
Augustus as
General, from
Primaporta,
Italy, perhaps
a copy of a
bronze original
of ca. 20 BC
Compare and contrast
Augustus (“exalted, sacred”), great-nephew
of Julius Caesar, is the first Roman
emperor
rarely has art been pressed into the service
of political power so directly as in the Age
of Augustus
In this period, poetry and art are filled with
the imagery of a blessed world, an empire
at peace under the guide of a great ruler
- the Augustus of Primaporta combines
traditional Roman with Greek formal
characteristics
It is composed of Classical Greek forms
subtly mixed with just a few authentic
physiognomic traits
Sculpture: Augustus and the Greek
Model
As opposed to Greek nameless athletes,
Augustus’s face is a recognizable portrait of a
specific person.
Yet, if compared to the republican verism,
Augustus is a “classical,” idealized beauty:
- regular shape, symmetrical features (even in
his hair: each lock has been carefully arranged),
- always young (as opposed to the rule by
elders that had characterized the Roman
Republic)
The body of Augustus combines the gesture
typical of Roman earlier representations of
orators
with the contrapposto pose and ideal
proportions of Polykleitos’s Spear Bearer
Through this stylistic combination, Augustus
presents himself
as the synthesis of Roman traditional values
and Greek most refined and elevated heritage
Aulus Metellus,
ca. 80 BC
The propaganda purpose of this statue is
even more evident in its complex
iconography
Iconography: (literally: “the writing of
images”) is both the content or subject of
an artwork and the study of content in art.
It includes the study of the symbolic, often
religious, meaning of objects, persons, or
events depicted in works of art
The presence of a Cupid, son of the
goddess Venus, is a reference to Augustus’s
claim to descent from Venus through her
human son Aeneas
In this way Augustus underscores both his
divine origins
and presents himself as the embodiment of
the continuity between Greek and Roman
cultures (Aeneas was a Homeric hero)
Sculpture: Augustus and the Greek Model
The relief on the emperor’s
cuirass advertises an
important diplomatic
victory,
showing Augustus as the
author of the new period of
stability, internal peace, and
economic prosperity known
as Pax Romana (“Roman
Peace”)
Sculpture: Augustus and the Greek Model
Wall Painting: Pompeii and the Four Styles
In 79 CE many Roman towns near Naples were
buried by the sudden eruption of the volcano
Vesuvius
among them, the most important was Pompeii
Because of this catastrophe, however, these cities
were preserved under the lava until their discovery
in the 18th century,
permitting an extremely precise historical
reconstruction of the art and daily life of Roman
towns of the Late Republic and Early Empire
The number and good conditions of mural paintings
from different periods, that were found in Pompeii,
permitted archaeologists and art historians identify
how taste and style in painting changed through
time
Four main stages were therefore called the Four
Pompeian Styles, which were then used as a point
of reference to analyze and date other Roman
paintings outside Pompeii
We will focus on the Second Style, which is
a pivotal passage in the history of Western
pictorial representation
Second Style wall painting (general view),
from Boscoreale, Italy, 50-40 BC,
Metropolitan Museum, New York
The interior walls of Roman houses
were often decorated with frescoes
Fresco: a painting done rapidly in
watercolor on wet plaster on a wall
or ceiling,
so that the colors penetrate the
plaster and become fixed as it dries
This was a bedroom of a villa at
Boscoreale (now at the Met), buried
by the Vesuvius
Its walls are completely covered
with fresco paintings that create the
illusion of a space extending
beyond the limits of the shallow
cubiculum
The Second Style painter
represented fake columns
Through the colonnade, the viewer
can admire fantastic urban
panorama
In order to create this fictional tri-
dimensional space on the the picture
plan, Roman painters developed a
sophisticated representational device,
LINEAR PERSPECTIVE,
This introduced the concept of the
painting AS A WINDOW,
that would be perceived, from the 1300s
to the early 20th century, as a major
characteristic of the Western approach
to image making (Panofsky, Perspective
as Symbolic Form)
Linear perspective: the impression of
real space is obtained through lines and
size of represented objects:
- The architectural details follow
diagonal lines that the eye interprets as
parallel lines receding into the distance
-objects meant to be perceived as far
away from the viewer are shown smaller
than those intended to appear nearby
- The volume of objects is obtained through the
depiction of light and shading: things are coherently
lit from one (or more) source of light and cast their
shadows accordingly
Compare and contrast
2 main differences:
3) Representation of
space: in stead of the
Egyptian subdivision of the
pictorial surface into
registers,
Roman artists create the
illusion of a coherent
vision,
where the viewer
understands things and
space in 2 ways:
a) the reciprocal position
of things in the fictional
tri-dimensional space,
b) their position in relation
to the viewer (above,
below, near, far away):
new relationship between
real and fictional spaces
Compare and contrast
Second difference:
2) Proportions of
represented
figures/objects:
in Egyptian hierarchical
proportions, the size
corresponds to the
importance of things in the
represented scene and to
people’s social rank,
in Roman Second Style
painting, the size of things
and persons, depends on
their position in space
3) Light contributes to a
more true-to-life effect but
also is a new device to
focus the viewer’s
attention on certain details
Gardenscape, Second
Style wall painting, from
the Villa Livia,
Primaporta, Italy, ca. 30-
20 BC
Second Style painters
invented another device to
suggest recession in the
represented space,
Atmospheric perspective:
This fresco comes from the
dining-room walls of an
aristocratic villa
The artist created the
illusion of being on or
pavilion looking out over
a low fence into a garden
of fruit trees
These are filled with a
variety of realistic birds
Depth is indicated not only
through linear perspective,
Gardenscape, Second
Style wall painting, from
the Villa Livia,
Primaporta, Italy, ca. 30-
20 BC
but also by the increasingly
blurred appearance of
objects in the distance
(atmospheric perspective)
the foreground and middle-
ground (fences, trees, and
birds) are precisely painted,
While the foliage on
background is represented
with an indistinct green
Here we find again the
dichotomy between a
painterly (atmospheric p.)
versus a linear (linear p.)
approach to image-making
Teple of Fortuna Virilis, Rome, ca.
75 BC
What is the style of this temple?
The columns and frieze are Ionic, and also the
structure columns-pediment-cella imitate the Greek
model
However, as in sculpture, also Roman architecture
combined Greek with traditional Roman forms
Architectural peculiarities of the Roman temple:
-the Roman temple stand on a raised platform, or
podium
-A single flight of steps leads to a front porch
entrance
-The Ionic columns are freestanding on the porch
and engaged (set into the wall) around the cella
The stress on the façade and the elevation of the
building on the podium were inherited by the
Etruscans
Reconstruction of an
Etruscan temple
On the other hand, they were a way to effectively
distinguish the sacred building in the chaotic
urban context
A feature of Roman architecture is what scholars
have defined as ECLECTICISM
Eclecticism: deriving ideas, style, or taste from a
broad and diverse range of sources
Roman architects tend to adopt styles from
different sources (Etruscan and Greek) and to
combine them freely (Colosseum’s columns and
capitals)
Roman architectural eclecticism corresponds to
their cultural-religious permeability:
They adopted not only the Greek gods and
myths, but also religious beliefs from the
people they had conquered
Doric
Ionic
Corinthian capitals: a more
decorated variation of Ionic
capitals, they were preferred by
Romans for their richest buildings
Colosseum (Flavian
Amphitheater),
Rome, ca. 70-80 CE
Pantheon, facade, Rome, 118-125 CE
Perhaps the most remarkable
ancient building surviving in
Rome is the Pantheon (“all
the gods”)
Originally it stood on a
podium and was approached
by stairs from the square
street construction hide them
Attachment holes in the
pediment indicate the
placement of sculpture
The façade resembles that of
a typical Roman temple:
Corinthian capitals
Tuscan column were an
Etruscan variation of the
Doric column (they added a
base and leaved the shaft
unfluted)
This standard façade,
however, brought to a
surprise in the interior
Behind the porch is a giant rotunda. The walls
support a bowl-shaped dome that is 143 feet in
diameter and 143 feet from the floor at its summit
The design is based on the intersection of two
circles (one horizontal, the other vertical)
so that the interior space can be imagined as the
orb of the earth and the dome as the vault of the
heavens
Standing at the center of this hemispherical
temple, the visitor feels isolated from the outside
world
The eye is drawn upward over the circular
patterns made by sunken panels, or coffers, in the
dome’s ceiling to the light entering the central
opening
The coffers both reduced the dome’s mass and
provided a handsome pattern of squares within
the vast circle
Light is used here not only to illuminate the
building but to create a symbolic link with the
gods
The Romans developed
concrete constructions, which
revolutionized architectural
design
Such as huge domed rooms
without internal support
Concrete enabled Roman
architects to think in terms of
space rather than of sheer
mass
While masonry domes could
not accommodate windows
without threatening their
stability,
Concrete domes could be
opened up at their apex with a
circular “eye” (oculos) allowing
light to reach the vast spaces
beneath