ros crowder, primary care continuing professional development tutor, nhs berkshire west &...
TRANSCRIPT
Ros Crowder, Primary Care Continuing Professional Development Tutor, NHS Berkshire West &
Programme Manager, South Central Revalidation Pilot, NHS South Central
Medical Revalidation
Revalidation: what is it?• A system to assure patients and the public that
doctors are fit to practise, up to date and providing clinically effective, personal and safe care.
• Appraisal is part of revalidation and affirms professional practise and defines future learning plans
• Revalidation occurs within governance frameworks (GMC, DH & Royal Colleges) that aim to build trust, assure standards and improve patient safety
RevalidationRevalidationRevalidationRevalidation
Re-Re-CertificationCertification
Re-Re-CertificationCertificationRe-LicensingRe-LicensingRe-LicensingRe-Licensing
Is this doctor fit to Is this doctor fit to practice as a medical practice as a medical practitioner in the UK?practitioner in the UK?
Is this doctor fit to Is this doctor fit to practice as a medical practice as a medical practitioner in the UK?practitioner in the UK?
Is this doctor fit to Is this doctor fit to practice as a specialist practice as a specialist
or generalist?or generalist?
Is this doctor fit to Is this doctor fit to practice as a specialist practice as a specialist
or generalist?or generalist?
General Medical Council Royal Colleges & Faculties
General Medical Council
Local Responsible Officer
The initial proposed model
Revalidation – current thinking
• Licence to Practice issued to every doctor who requested one, October 2009
• The GP and Specialist Registers are a record of historical achievement; once on it the doctor will stay on it
• The Licence will reflect what a doctor is revalidated for and relicensing will be the main output from revalidation
Qualification
Registration
Renewal of Licence
Licence to Practice
Revalidation
Train
ing
Strengthened Appraisal
Every
5 Years
Life-long
Registration(Specialist or GP)
Changes in role and interests
The current proposed model
General Medical General Medical CouncilCouncil
General Medical General Medical CouncilCouncil
Local Local Responsible Responsible
OfficerOfficer
Local Local Responsible Responsible
OfficerOfficer
Royal Colleges Royal Colleges & Faculties& Faculties
Royal Colleges Royal Colleges & Faculties& Faculties
GMC GMC AffiliateAffiliateGMC GMC
AffiliateAffiliate
ProfessionaProfessionall
ProfessionaProfessionall LayLayLayLay
Local ProcessesLocal ProcessesLocal ProcessesLocal Processes
StrengtheneStrengthened Appraisald Appraisal
StrengtheneStrengthened Appraisald Appraisal Job PlanningJob PlanningJob PlanningJob Planning
PerformancPerformance e
ManagemenManagementt
PerformancPerformance e
ManagemenManagementt
Clinical Clinical AuditAudit
Clinical Clinical AuditAudit
Clinical Clinical GovernanceGovernance
Clinical Clinical GovernanceGovernance
Specialty Specialty Specific Specific
AssessmentsAssessments
Specialty Specialty Specific Specific
AssessmentsAssessments
BoardBoardBoardBoard
RegulatorRegulator‘‘R’ - high level R’ - high level remedial supportremedial support
‘‘r’ - low level r’ - low level remedial remedial supportsupport
Informal SupportInformal Support
College/Faculty Quality College/Faculty Quality Assurance (audit of sample)Assurance (audit of sample)
Port
folio
of
Port
folio
of
Evid
en
ceEvid
en
ce
Appra
isal x 5
Appra
isal x 5
Loca
l R
esp
onsi
ble
Lo
cal R
esp
onsi
ble
O
ffice
rO
ffice
r
Self-HelpSelf-Help
Colle
ge/F
acu
lty
Colle
ge/F
acu
lty
(fu
ll evid
en
ce
(fu
ll evid
en
ce
revie
wre
vie
w))
Colle
ge/F
acu
lty P
lus
Colle
ge/F
acu
lty P
lus
Loca
l R
esp
on
sib
le
Loca
l R
esp
on
sib
le
Offi
cer
Offi
cer
Gen
era
l M
ed
ical
Gen
era
l M
ed
ical
Cou
nci
lC
ou
nci
l
QueryQuery
Positive Statement of AssurancePositive Statement of Assurance
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Appraisal is a tool which:• … helps individuals consider their performance
and their development needs in the context of:The requirements of their current role
The evolving needs of their organisation
Developments in their specialty/profession
Personal needs, wants, aspirations
Political imperatives
Appraisal is an opportunity to:• Review performance (and address issues)
• Consider the doctor’s contribution to the service
• Identify and address working environment issues
• Discuss opportunities and aspirations
• Discuss and plan personal development needs
• Balance skills and resources
Challenge
Personal Development
Support
The Appraisal Balance
Strengthened Medical Appraisal1. Common framework for appraisal, and
assessment of supporting information
2. Availability of supporting information to support the appraisal process
3. A common quality framework for appraisal
4. Effective local clinical governance systems
The appraiser’s role in strengthened medical appraisal (SMA)
• Ability to assess a portfolio of supporting information
• Ability to make judgements about the progress of an appraisee towards revalidation
• Ability to benchmark own personal standards against those of peers, and moderate individual judgements and assessments to achieve consistency with other appraisers
• What do appraisers do in SMA?• Manage the process of the appraisal interview
• Manage the content of the appraisal interview
• Review/Assess supporting information
• Make a judgement about whether there are any immediate concerns about patient safety
• Make a judgement about whether doctor is on track to revalidate (at this point in the cycle)
• Record the agreed outcomes of the appraisal interview
• Assist in the planning of development needs
Supporting information• Current GMC License and Registration• Complaints and Litigation• Adverse Incidents (incl. learning from)• Multi-source Feedback• Patient Satisfaction Questionnaires• Other pertinent documents
(e.g. audit; outcome measures)• Significant Event Audits• Specific items recommended by College• Anything else the appraisee thinks appropriate
RST Proposed Generic Essential Information
Type of InformationType of Information Min. Required Min. Required in 5 Yearsin 5 Years CommentsComments
1Significant Event Review/Case
Review10 Minimum 2 per year
2 Review of Complaints All
3Audit (of which some may be less
formal data review)5 Minimum 1 per year
4Patient Feedback Survey and
Review1 To be presented no later than yr 5
5Colleague Feedback Survey and
Review1 To be presented no later than yr 5
6New PDP and Review of Previous
Year’s PDP5 Annually
7 CPD Completion 5 Annually
8 Health Self Declaration and Review 5 Annually
9 Probity Self-Declaration and Review 5 Annually
RCGP Proposals for Continuing Education• Continuing education recorded in the form of
learning credits• At least 50 learning credits a year• More than 250 over 5-year revalidation cycle• Minimum of 1 credit for each hour of education• Each hour of education leading to improvements
in care or practice will qualify for 2 credits.
Good Medical Practice Domains, Attributes & StandardsGMC, 2005
4 Domains:Knowledge skills & performanceSafety & qualityCommunication, partnership & team workMaintaining trust
12 Attributes70+ ‘standards’
Assessing supporting information
• Does it suggest cause for immediate concern?
• Which attribute(s) of GMP does it inform?
(NB Many items will inform more than one attribute.)
• Does it show evidence of personal reflection?
• Does it contribute to revalidation:• Yes, on it’s own (e.g. colleague and patient feedback)
• Yes, if produced regularly (e.g. outcome data)
• Not as it stands, because … (e.g. incomplete)
• No, it doesn’t reflect what the doctor does
• Has the doctor met the CPD recommendations of their College/Association?
• What learning needs (if any) does it identify
Conclusion by Appraiser …A) Potential risk:• Are there genuine immediate concerns about this doctors practice?• If yes, are measures in place to protect patients, colleagues, the doctor and
the public? (with detail)
B) Areas for development:• Are there areas where the doctor’s performance has not been clearly
demonstrated to be of a satisfactory standard with regard to the guidance expressed in GMP?
• Does the PDP cover all areas that the doctor needs to address, with timeframes?
C) Revalidation:• Are there areas where the doctor’s progress towards satisfactory
Revalidation may be in doubt? • Have these been identified and understood, with an appropriate plan in
place?
The appraiser’s judgement and evidence from the organisation’s clinical governance systems will inform the Responsible Officer’s recommendation to the GMC.
Revalidation Support Team Pathfinder pilots• 3000 appraisals across England• Whole system testing• Testing Information flows• Nominated “Responsible officer” role• Preparation for “live” testing• Evaluation to inform Treasury impact
assessment• Single & Multi organisational• Advanced and early stage sites• Range of doctor specialties and roles
High level aims• To identify the impact on individuals and
organisations in terms of cost, time andresources
• To identify problems arising atorganisation and individual level inimplementing the proposed arrangements
• To identify any benefits related to theappraisal and revalidation process egpatient care and clinical outcomes
Whole system sites:Isle of WightMilton KeynesRoyal Berkshire Foundation TrustVoluntary sites:Other South Central organisations
Participation in the pilot:• Consent• Agree to complete evaluation forms• Strengthened Training of Appraisers for
Revalidation (STAR)• Register on electronic toolkit• Collect supporting information for appraisal on
toolkit & map to GMC attributes• Appraisal discussion• Evaluation• Responsible officer review
Further information:• GMC consultationhttp://www.gmc-uk.org/doctors/licensing/5786.asp• NHS South Centralhttp://www.southcentral.nhs.uk/page.php?id=433• Revalidation Support Teamwww.revalidationsupport.nhs.uk• RCGPhttp://www.rcgp.org.uk/_revalidation.aspx• South Central Revalidation Pilothttp://www.southcentral.nhs.uk/page.php?id=433• Ros Crowder / Maggie Woods, CPD [email protected]@southcentral.nhs.uk