rosemarie g. edillon, phd undersecretary for policy … g. edillon, phd undersecretary for policy...

21
Rosemarie G. Edillon, PhD UnderSecretary for Policy and Planning National Economic and DevelopmentAuthority The state of human capital in the Philippines 1

Upload: vonga

Post on 03-May-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Rosemarie G. Edillon, PhD

UnderSecretary for Policy and Planning

National Economic and DevelopmentAuthority

The state of human capital in the Philippines

1

2

Table 10 .2 B a s i c E d u c a t i o n Ind ica tor s i n t h e Resu l t s M a t r i x of t h e U p d a t e d P h i l i p p i n e

D e v e l o p m e n t P l a n 2 0 1 1 - 2 0 1 6

BASEL INE ANNUAL PDP TARGETS ACCOMPLISHMENTINDICATORS

YEAR VALUE 2014 2015 20 1420 16 2015

Kindergarten 2 0 1 0

Net enrolment rateincreased (in%)

57.2 89.7 100.0 100.0

95.9 97.0 98.0 99.0

64.7 68.0 70.0 71.0

Adjusted net enrolment rateincreased ( n %)

98.5 99.0 99.0 99.0

92.5 95.0 97.0 99.0

Completion rateincreased (n%)

72.1 78.0 81.0 83.0

75.1 76.0 78.0 80.0

Cohort surv ival rate increased ( i n %)

74.2 79.0 81.0 83.0

79.4 81.0 83.0 85.0

Achievement rateincreased ( n%)

79.30 74.65

Elementary 2010 92.57 91.05

Secondary 2 0 1 0 63.23 68.15

Elementary2 0 1 0 93.01 91.84

Secondary 2010 86.19 82.24

Elementary 2010 83.04 83.43

Secondary 2 0 1 0 78.70 73.97

Elementary2 0 1 0 85.08 87.07

Secondary 2010 81.24 80.75

Elementary 2 0 1 0 6 8 . 2 7 3 . 0 75.0 77.0 69.1

Secondary 2 0 1 0 4 7 . 9 5 7 . 0 62.0 65.0 49.48

S o u r c e s : E M I S , D e p E d

NAT IONA L ECONOMIC A N D

5f f i ( } DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Ta b l e 1 0 . 3 H i g h e r a n d Te c h n i c a l E d u c a t i o n I n d i c a t o r s i n t h e Res u l t s M a t r i x of t h e

U p d a t e d Ph i l i p p i n e D e v e l o p m e n t P l a n 2 0 11 - 2 0 1 6

BASEL INE ANNUAL PDP TARGETS ACCOMPLISHMENTINDICATORS

YEAR VALUE 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 6 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5

2010 8 2 . 9 8 6 . 5 8 7 8 7 . 5 9 1 . 3 9 1 . 1

2010 1 , 3 4 4 , 3 7 1 1 ,464 ,000 1 , 6 1 0 , 5 1 0 1 , 7 7 1 , 5 6 0 1 , 7 8 5 , 6 7 9 2,129,758

2010 4 9 8 , 4 1 8 5 6 7 , 5 3 1 5 8 4 , 4 7 4 6 0 1 , 5 0 5 6 3 2 , 0 7 6 6 9 2 , 6 0 2

2010 3 8 . 8 7 5 5 6 0 6 5 4 0 . 8 1 4 0 . 3 4

2010 1 1 . 0 9 2 0 2 5 3 0 1 2 . 5 4 1 2 . 6 2

2010 1 9 . 8 9 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 5 . 3 8 2 6 . 6 3

2010 3 3 . 9 1 4 9 . 7 2 5 0 . 9 4 5 2 . 5 3 6 1 . 4 5 5 8 . 5 9

Certif ication rate in TVET

increased ( in %)

TVET graduates increased

Higher education graduates

increased

Proportion of HEIfacultywith MA increased ( i n %)

Proportion of HEIfaculty with PhD increased (in %)

HEls w i th accredited programs

increased ( in %)

National passing percentage (across disciplines) i n licensure exams increased ( in%)

Source: WEF, Global Human Capital Report 2017

0-14 15-24 25-54 55-64 65+

% of popn 32.0 19.4 37.6 6.4 4.7

Capacity 78.8/19 V R V R V R V R V R

Literacy and numeracy 98.2 77 96.6 44 95.4 32 91.4 28

Primary ed attainment rate 99.5 56 98.3 52 97.1 51 94.9 43

Secondary ed attainment rate

85.0 41 75.9 54 56.8 53 41.5 45

Tertiary ed attainment rate 29.3 18 20.9 25 16.5 23

Deployment 60.6/87

LFPR 46.5 57 77.2 102 67.7 50 35.7 33

Employment gender gap 0.63 98 0.65 101 0.70 55 0.60 34

Unemployment rate 13.9 65 4.5 49 2.0 32 1.1 47

Underemployment rate 9.1 50 9.9 67 10.1 71 8.2 68

Source: WEF, Global Human Capital Report 2017

0-14 15-24 25-54 55-64 65+

% of popn 32.0 19.4 37.6 6.4 4.7

Deployment 65.7/60 V R V R V R V R V R

Primary enrolment rate 96.8 61

Quality of primary schools 3.9 70

Secondary ed enrolment rate 64.6 92

Secondary gender gap 1.0 1

Vocational ed gender gap

Tertiary ed enrolment rate 35.8 71

Skill diversity of graduates

Quality of educationsystem 4.3 41

Extent of staff training 4.6 29

Source: WEF, Global Human Capital Report 2017

0-14 15-24 25-54 55-64 65+

% of popn 32.0 19.4 37.6 6.4 4.7

Know-how 52.3/60 V R V R V R V R

High-skilled employment share

24.1 58

Medium-skilled employment share

68.4

Economic complexity 0.46

Availability of skilled

employees4.5

Source: WEF, Global Human Capital Report 2017

The Life We Want

9

Matatag

✓Family is together

✓Time with friends ü

Work-life balance ü

Strong sense of

community

Panatag

✓ Enough Resources for

day-to-day needs and

unexpected expenses✓ Peace and security

✓ Long and healthy life

✓ Comfortable retirement

Maginhawa✓ Free from hunger

and poverty

✓ Comfortable and

secure homes✓ Good transport

✓ Travel and vacation

10

From vision to action

Long-term Developmental Goals

By 2040, Philippines will be a• prosperous,

• predominantly middle-class society

• where no one is poor;Our peoples will

• live long and healthy lives,• be smart and innovative and

• live in a high-trust society

2017-2022

2023-2028

2029-2034

2035-2040

Housing and Urban Development

Construction,construction-related

manufacturing, house

development-related

manufacturing, and utilities

(electricity, gas, and water).

Manufacturing

Food processing,

housing-related,

construction-related,

transport

manufacturing,and

other manufacturing.

Connectivity

Roads and bridges, port,airports, vehicles,

transport-systems, and communication.

Agriculture

Food production,

commercial and

industrial crop,

agricultural

biotechnology, etc.

Tourism and

Allied Services

Resort, rest-recreation

hotels, accommodation,

travel and tour cultural

shows, heritage sites,

etc.

Financial Services

Consumer financing,

enterprise financing,and

insurance savings

mobilization.

Competitive Enterprises Needed

21st CENTURY SKILLS

Foundational Literaci

How students apply core skills to everyday tasks

abc 123

Literacy Numeracy Scienti?cliteracy

ICT Econ Cultural and literacy & fin lit civic literacy

esCompetencies

How students approach

complex challenges

Critical thinking/ Creativity problem-solving

Communication Collaboration

Character Qualities

How students approach their changing

environment

Curiosity Initiatvie Persistence/

grit

AdaptabilityLeadershipSocial andcultural

awareness

http://www.consultancy.uk/news/1734/wef-bcg-students-lack-skills-needed-

The Philippine

Development Plan

(PDP) 2017-2022 isthe first medium-

term plan that is

geared towards

AmBisyon Natin

2040

13

MATATAG, MAGINHAWA AT PANATAG NA BUHAY

"PAGBABAGO"

INEQUALITY-REDUCING TRANSFORMATION

TO LAY DOWN THE FOUNDATION FOR INCLUSIVE GROWTH, A HIGH-TRUST

SOCIETY,AND A GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY

t"MALASAKIT''

ENHANCING THE

SOCIAL FABRIC

Promote Philippine culture and values

Ensure people-centered, clean,and efficient

governance

Pursue swift and fair administration of justice

Ensure peace and security

Expand

economico ortunities

ncrease access to economic opportunities

"PATULOY NA PAG-UNLAD"

INCREASING GROWTH

POTENTIAL

Promote technology adoption

Stimulate innovation

IMPLEMENTSTRATEGIC TRADEAND FISCAL POLICY,MAINTAIN

MACROECONOMICSTABILITY,PROMOTECOMPETITION

Accelerate human capital development

Reduce vulnerability of

individuals

Accelerate strategic infrastructure development

Ensure safetyand build resilience

Maximize demographicdividend

Ensure ecological integrity, clean and

healthy environment

Improved employability

Accelerate human capital development

Income-earning ability increased

Improved productivity

Encourage skills development and

retooling through continuing

education and training

Strengthen employment facilitation

services

Strengthen and expand internship,

apprenticeship and dual training

programs

Implement programs that encourage

women to participate in the labor

market

Strengthen

implementation of the

two-tiered wage system

Ensure safety and

health in the workplace

Nurture workplace harmony

Enhanced labor mobility and income security

Provide income support

and emergency

employment

Enhance the efficacy of

the minimum wage

policy

“Pagbabago”

Inequality-reducing transformation

Quality, accessible, relevant and liberating basic education for all achieved

Quality of higher and technical education and research improved for equity and global competitiveness improved

Strengthen early childhood care and development programs

Pursue full implementation of K to

12

Strengthen inclusion programs

Develop and improve interventions to keep children in school

Continue curricular reforms

Enhance teacher competencies

Enhance community-based training for special groups

Provide access to quality and

relevant, TVET opportunities

Ensure globally competitive

TVET programs

Expand access to higher education

Integrate 21st Century competencies

Promote creative arts

Strengthen QualityAssurance

Mechanisms

Improve research and

innovation, and extension

services

Expand Government-

Academe-Industry

collaboration

Promote excellenceamong

HEIs

“Pagbabago”

Inequality-reducing transformation

Accelerate human capital development

Lifelong learning opportunities for all ensured

T a b l e 10.5 P l a n Targe t s t o E n s u r e Li fe lon g L e a r n i n g O p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r Al l (C o r e

I n d i c a t o r s )

OF PL

Proportion of students at low mastery reduced f rom 14% to 10%

Junior High School 1 4.88

INDICATORS 2A BASELINE(20 15) END ANTARGET

Mean Years of School ing8.9

(2014) 11.3

Functional Literacy Rate• 90.3

(2013)

Net Enrolment Rate

Kindergarten 74.65 95.00

Elementary 91.05 95.00

Junior High School 68.15 75 .44

Completion Rate

Elementary 83 .43 90.00

Junior High School 73.97 78.48

Proportion of students performing at Mov ingtowards mastery,closely approximating

mastery and mastered increased 25

Elementary 63.93 74.39

Junior High School 14.37 20.00

10 .00

T a b l e 1 0 . 5 P l a n T a r g e t s t o E n s u r e L i f e l o n g L e a r n i n g O p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r A l l (C o r e

I n d i c a t o r s )

INDICATORS 2A BASELINE (2 015) ENDOFPLANTARGET

Percentage of students awardedscholarships,grants,and other f inancial assistance(% )

Percentage of tert iary graduates in science, engineering, manufacturing and

construction

Certif ication rate of TVET graduatesa

5 10

26 4 0

GDP

000

Percentage of ETEEAP graduates

Increased government expenditure for higher education research,development,and

innovation 0.

50

17% of GDP

60

0.5% of

Increased number of patents, l icenses,and royalties issued to HEls 2 3 1 500

Increased number of researchers and scientists 8 4 1 2,600

Number of curricula and programs developed I revised based on mult i-discipl ina lplatforms that foster 21st century competencies

Increasednumberof HElsengaged in loca l andglobalpartnershipsandcollaborations

7 2

4 4

100

100

Increased number o f graduate education graduates (MNPhD) engaged in original

research of creative work6,500 10,

Increased number of innovation hubs established within HEls 81 150

9 1 .3

(2016)

Ta b l e 1 0 . 6 P l a n Ta rg e t s t o I n c re a s e I n c o , n e E a r n i n g A b i l i t y ( C o r e I n d i c a t o r s ) )

y

INDICATORS BASELINE(2015) E N OF

Decreased percentage of adult NEET tbd

Decreased percentage of youth NEETa• {%) 22.7(2015) 15-18

Decreased duration of school - to-workb transition of college graduate 2 years (2008 ADB Household Surveyc)

6-9 months

Decreased duration of school -to-workb transition of high schoolgraduate 4 years (2008 ADB Household Surveyc)

9- 12 months

Decreased percentage of discouraged workers{%) 12.5 (2014) 10

Increased number of HE graduates engaged i n job collaboration 440,000 700,000

Percentage of female wi th advanced degrees employed (%) 12.7 20

Increased labor force participation rate of women (%) 49.3 51.3

Labor productivity inindustry sector increased (%) -4 .2 3.0-4.0

Labor productivity i n service sectorincreased (%) 3 . 1 4.0-5.0

Frequency rate of fatal and non-fatal occupational injuries decreased• 2.03

{2013)

Percentage of unemployed covered by unemployment insurance tbd

"Baseline and target are only for not i n educat ion and emp l o ymen t (NEE). T h e indicatorfor n o t i n educat ion,

employ m e n t and train ing (NEET) isfor development i n t h e L a b o r Force Survey.hW o r k isdefin ed as perman en t wagejo b .

c Based o n a n A D B Study: Bird . K . 2 0 1 2 . A r e Filipino Youth off to a Good Star t? Yo u t h Labor M a r k e t Exper ience

i n the Phi l ippines .ADB: Mani laNote: ( * ) are indicators based o n the S DGs

20

“We cannot always build the future for our

youth,but we can build our youth for the

future.”

Franklin D. Roosevelt

Address at University of PennsylvaniaSeptember 20, 1940

21

http://pdp.neda.gov.ph