route 220 safety improvement project · 2015. 3. 12. · 2015 - final plans being developed as a...

Route 220 Safety Improvement Project State Project Number: 0220-011-786, 0220-011-788, 0220-011-789

UPCs: 105543, 105544, 105545

Federal Number: NH-5128(326)

March 12, 2015

Salem District

Route 220 Safety Improvement Project

1. Corridor

2. Previously Considered Improvements

3. Existing Conditions

4. Upgraded Two-lane Roadway

5. Project Schedule and Funding

Introduction

Corridor

A. Commercial Corridor

B. Intermodal Connectivity

C. National Highway System (NHS)

D. Statewide Significance

Corridor

A. Commercial Corridor

B. Intermodal Connectivity

C. National Highway System (NHS)

D. Statewide Significance Connections with

other States

1964 - Study examined potential to widen Route 220 between Clifton Forge

and Roanoke.

1990’s - Study examined a section of Route 220 from Roanoke to Clifton

Forge as part of the TransAmerica Corridor to provide 4 lanes.

Funding not acquired as part of this effort.

Early 2000’s - Preliminary plans developed for three projects to 4-lane

approximately 7.2 miles. Portion of right of way acquired.

Insufficient funds to finalize design and acquire all right of way.

2012 thru 2013 - Highway Safety Improvement Projects extended shoulders where

possible, upgraded and installed guardrail, upgraded signs, added

rumble strips, and enhanced markings in roadway.

2015 - Final plans being developed as a Safety Improvement Project

replacing two narrow bridges north of Route 43 Intersection.

2015 - Begin development of preliminary plans as a safety improvement

project to upgrade the two-lane roadway from Route 43 Intersection

to Route 727 Intersection. Proposed as three (3) projects in the Six

Year Plan. Phase 1 is fully funded.

Previously Considered Improvements

6

Existing Conditions

A. Roadway Characteristics

B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Alignment – Horizontal Curves

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History


Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Sight Distance around Curves

Alignment – Vertical Curves

Sight Distance

Over Hills

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History


Sight Distance

Over Hills

Stopping Sight

Distance

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History


Sight Distance

Over Hills

Stopping Sight

Distance

Stopping Sight

Distance

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Curve Banking

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Narrow Lanes and Narrow Shoulders

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Narrow Bridges and Structures

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Limited Passing Opportunities

Direction

Passing

Zones

Length

(miles)

Northbound 4 1.3

Southbound 5 0.9

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Intersections

Street Name Route RT Turn LT Turn

Narrow Passage Road Route 43 Yes No

Gala Loop Road Route 694 Yes No

Gala Loop Road Route 622 (S) Yes No

Prices Bluff Road Route 622 (N) No No

Chatham Road Route 722 (S) No No

Chatham Road Route 722 (N) No No

Locust Bottom Route 696 (S) No No

Buhrman Road Route 696 (N) No No

McKinney Hollow Route 633 No No

Glen Wilton Road Route 633 No No

Simmons Lane Route 700 No No

Fork Farm Road Route 727 No No

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Intersections

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Crash History

8/1/2010 - 7/31/2014

Total Crashes 72

Fixed Object – Off Road 23

Animal 21

Rear End 14

Angle 4

Non-collision 3

Head-on 3

Sideswipe – Opposite Direction 2

Sideswipe – Same Direction 1

Pedestrian 1

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Crash History

Existing S-Curve

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

32

Crash History

Existing Horizontal Curve

Existing Conditions


B. Intersections

C. Crash History

Traffic Volumes

Route County 2013 AADT % Trucks Truck Volume 24 Bedford 15000 2% 300

811 Bedford 14000 2% 280

114 Montgomery 10000 1% 100

685 Montgomery 9900 2% 198

122 Franklin 9300 4% 372

40 Franklin 9200 6% 552

311 Roanoke 9100 3% 273

8 Montgomery 8500 4% 340

122 Bedford 7700 5% 385

221 Floyd 7500 3% 225

221 Bedford 7100 5% 355

221 Carroll 6900 3% 207

8 Floyd 6800 3% 204

221 Roanoke 6800 3% 204

611 Pulaski 6700 7% 469

220 Botetourt 5500 7% 385

779 Botetourt 5300 11% 583

8 Patrick 5000 7% 350

100 Pulaski 4000 9% 360 33

Traffic Volumes

34

Route County 2013 AADT % Trucks Truck Volume

779 Botetourt 5300 11% 583

40 Franklin 9200 6% 552

611 Pulaski 6700 7% 469

220 Botetourt 5500 7% 385

122 Bedford 7700 5% 385

Route County 2013 AADT % Trucks Truck Volume

779 Botetourt 5300 11% 583

100 Pulaski 4000 9% 360

611 Pulaski 6700 7% 469

220 Botetourt 5500 7% 385

8 Patrick 5000 7% 350

Where are we?

35

Where are we?

36

Multiple Studies – spread over a half a century

Four-lane Dropped…

Highway Safety Improvements Funded and

Constructed

Highway Safety Improvements Funded

Past Environmental Studies Conducted

2015 Safety Improvements

No Four-lane?

Two-lane upgrade

Environmental

Status

Where are we?

37




Constructed




No Four-lane?

Two-lane upgrade

Environmental

Status

Where are we?

38




Constructed




No Four-lane?

Two-lane upgrade

Environmental

Status

(Focus on Safety Improvements)

Upgraded Two-Lane Roadway

A. Proposed Roadway

Characteristics

B. Intersections

C. Schedule and Funding


Upgraded Two-Lane Highway

1) Proposed Roadway Characteristics

2) Intersections

3) Scheduling and Funding

Improve Geometrics



A. Proposed Roadway Characteristics

B. Intersections

C. Scheduling and Funding

“Straighten” Curves

Curve Banking (Super-elevation)


1) Proposed Roadway Characteristics

2) Intersections

3) Scheduling and Funding

44

Wider Lanes and

Wider Shoulders

Additional Passing Opportunities



B. Intersections


Direction

Existing

Length

(miles)

Added

Length

(miles)

Proposed

Length

(miles)

Northbound 1.3 +1.3 2.6

Southbound 0.9 +1.4 2.3

Direction

Existing

Zones

Proposed

Zones

Northbound 5 8

Southbound 4 8



B. Intersections


Funding (Six Year Plan) Estimated Cost: $10 Million

Available Funding: $10 Million

Schedule* Design – Underway

Right of Way – Summer 2015

Advertisement – Fall 2016

Bridge (Structure) Replacement Project

Intersections



B. Intersections


Street Name Route RT Turn LT Turn

Narrow Passage Road Route 43 Yes Yes

Gala Loop Road Route 694 Yes Yes

Gala Loop Road Route 622 (S) Yes Yes

Prices Bluff Road Route 622 (N) Yes Yes

Chatham Road Route 722 (S) Yes Yes

Chatham Road Route 722 (N) Yes Yes

Locust Bottom/

Buhrman Road Route 696 Yes Yes

McKinney Hollow/

Glen Wilton Road Route 633 Yes Yes

Simmons Lane Route 700 Yes Yes

Fork Farm Road Route 727 Yes No

Add Left and Right Turn

Tapers/Lanes

Add Left and Right Turn Lanes



B. Intersections


Re-aligning

Intersections



B. Intersections


Project Summary

Length: 10 miles

Estimated Cost: $150 Million

SYP Funding: $78 Million

Project Schedule and Funding

A. Project Schedule

Phase 1 – Advertise Summer 2019

Phase 2 – Advertise Fall 2021

Phase 3 – Advertise Fall 2022

B. Funding

Phase 1 – Fully Funded

Phase 2 – Partially Funded

Phase 3 – Partially Funded



B. Intersections


56

Phase 1

Funding (Six Year Plan) Design (PE) - Funded

Right of Way (RW) - Funded

Construction (CN) - Funded



*Schedule dependent on funding

Schedule* Design – Spring 2015


Advertisement – Summer 2019


Right of Way (RW) - Funded

Construction (CN) - No Funds



57

Phase 2

Schedule* Design – Fall 2015




58

Phase 3


Right of Way (RW) - No Funds

Construction (CN) - No Funds




Schedule* Design – Fall 2016



59

Project Summary Approximately 10 miles


Funding: $78 Million

Build on previous work

Improved Alignment

Wider Lanes

Wider Shoulders

Improved Intersections

Realignment

Turn Lane

Summary

60

Summary

61

route 220 safety improvement project · 2015. 3. 12. · 2015 - final plans being developed as a...

Documents