routing metrics for wireless mesh networks
DESCRIPTION
Routing Metrics for Wireless Mesh Networks. CSE 6590 Fall 2010. Wireless Mesh Networks. Mostly static nodes Limited bandwidth Ample energy supply Possibly multi-radio/multi-channel/multi-rate. New Routing Metrics for WMNs. Motivation Limited bandwidth require efficient routing Goals - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CSE 6590Fall 2010
Routing Metrics for Wireless Mesh Networks
1 22 April 2023
2
Wireless Mesh NetworksMostly static nodesLimited bandwidthAmple energy supplyPossibly multi-radio/multi-channel/multi-
rate
3
New Routing Metrics for WMNs
MotivationLimited bandwidth require efficient routing
GoalsHigh throughputLow end-to-end delay
4
Intra Flow Interference Nodes on the path of the same flow compete with
each other for channel bandwidth Causes throughput to decrease sharply Increases delay at each hop Increases bandwidth consumption
5
Inter Flow InterferenceA node which transmits also contends for
bandwidth with the nodes in the neighbouring area of its path.Leads to bandwidth starvation Some nodes may never get to transmit
22/04/236
Routing Protocols for Mesh Networks
RoutingProtocols
On DemandRouting
ProactiveRouting
SourceRouting
Hop-by-HopRouting
Routing Protocols for Mesh Networks
22/04/237
On Demand RoutingOriginally designed for mobile ad hoc
networkse.g., DSR, AODV
Flood-based route discovery when source needs to communicate with destinationGood for maintaining network connectivity
under frequent changes in topologyHigh overhead is unnecessary in networks with
static nodes
22/04/238
Table-Driven (Proactive) RoutingProactively maintain and update routing tablesBroadcast route update messages
PeriodicallyTopology changes
Lower overhead than on-demand routing in static networks
Cannot cope with frequent metrics changesRoute flappingHigh message overhead
Two approaches:Source routingHop-by-hop routing
22/04/239
Source RoutingExample protocol: LQSRSource nodes put entire path in packet headerLarge packet headers waste network
bandwidthDoes not scale
22/04/2310
Hop-by Hop RoutingDistance-vector routing (slow convergence )Link-state routing (fast convergence)Packet only carries destination addressSmall overheadScalablePreferable, especially link-state routing
22/04/2311
Least Cost Path RoutingRouting protocols route packets along minimum weight
pathsPerformance of minimum weight paths impact the performance
of routing protocols
Characteristics of pathPath lengthLink packet loss ratioLink capacityIntra-flow interferenceInter-flow interference
Capture as many characteristics as possibleNote: In multi-channel multi-radio networks, channel
assignment and routing must work together for optimal performance.
22/04/2312
Routing Metrics for WMNsHop CountExpected Transmission Count (ETX)Expected Transmission Time (ETT)Weighted Cumulative ETT (WCETT)Metric of Interference and Channel
Switching (MIC)The metrics evolved, each incorporating
features of the previous ones
ETX
13
Expected number of transmissions required for successfully receiving a packet over that link.
ETX = 1 / (Pf . Pr)
Pf : packet delivery ratio in forward direction
Pr : packet delivery ratio in backward direction
To get Pf and Pr : sending one probe packet per second.
ETX is an additive metricPath cost = sum of link costs on that path
ETT
14
Expected transmission timeETT = ETX x (S / B)
S: average packet sizeB: data rate
WCETT
15
Weighted cumulative expected transmission time
Addresses the issue of channel reuse along a path
WCETT (2)
16
WCETT Example
17
22/04/2318
Loop Free Routing - IsotonicityDefinition
The order of the weights of two paths must be preserved when we append or prefix a common third path on the two paths
MIC
19
Metric of Interface and Channel switchingImproves upon WCETT
MIC (2)
20
MIC (3)IRU (Interference-aware Resource Usage)
The aggregated channel time of all the neighbouring nodes (include end points of link l) consumed by the transmission on link l
Captures path length, link capacity, loss ratio and inter-flow interference
CSC (Channel Switching Cost)Captures intra-flow interference
21
22/04/2322
Routing Metrics for WMNs
22/04/2323
Performance Evaluation Single ChannelCompare MIC, ETT and hop countSimulation parameters
One radio per nodeAll radios configured to the same channel1000m x 1000m, 100 nodes, 20 flows
22/04/2324
Single Channel ─ Results
22/04/2325
Performance EvaluationMultiple ChannelsCompare MIC, ETT, WCETT and hop countSimulation parameters
2 radios per nodeEach can be configured to 1 of 3 channels1000m x 1000m, 100 nodes, 20 flows
22/04/2326
Multiple Channels ─ Results
References
27
“Wireless Mesh Networking” book, section 1.8.