royal norwegian ministry of defence difi 2012 human resource management gap analysis

Click here to load reader

Upload: cornelius-skinner

Post on 12-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

adamianuri resursebis marTva Tavdcavis saministroSi

Royal Norwegian Ministry of DefenceDIFI2012Human Resource ManagementGap analysisGAP ANALYSISContentMerit based recruitment and promotionSeparation of Politics and AdministrationRights and ObligationIntegrityHR Management development

Gaps Discovered Merit Based Recruitment / PromotionWestern Standards- Non-partisan, fair and transparentBased on assessment of competence and ability to do the JobPublic competition and selection the best available personProbationary employment (after competition) GAPS: RecruitmentPolitically biased (based on researches) Possibility to appoint without competition (law on civil service Appointment made by minister. Employer Ministry not State; No independent external appeal bodies (just court)

Gaps Discovered Merit Based Recruitment / PromotionGaps: Promotion

No clear standards for promotionNo competitive based PromotionNo link between promotion, career progression and perfromance appraisal

Human Resource Management Department Recommendations

HR policy development (concept, guidelines, code of conduct ) and HR Policy unit

HR systems development and implementation recruitment, Selection, Appraisal, development, career progression

Human Resource Planning (needed legal base)

Job DescriptionsRecommendations

Corresponding to actual job content and clearly distinguishing levels of difficulty and responsibility of different positions

Quickly adaptive to changing priorities

Compatible job descriptions and grading within and across public service and thus to promote staff mobility

Performance Appraisal RecommendationsRegular/periodic

Appraisal criteria should be objective and perfromance oriented

Should include interview and written report

Sufficient checks and balance; assessment report should be countersigned

Legal and managerial consequences of appraisal aoutcomes should be transparent and established

Training and development Recommendations

Fully and systematically Planned

Adequate indicate the bodies on responsibility for the provision of training falls and role of training institutions

Mechanisms cost of training are budgeted

Link the tarinings to advancement and promotion

Questions