rpi: leveraging the social web

37
Leveraging the Social Web for Teaching & Learning Past, Present, & Future Richard Hartshorne, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Instructional Systems Technology University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Upload: richard-hartshorne

Post on 20-Jul-2015

264 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Leveraging the Social Web

for Teaching & LearningPast, Present, & Future

Richard Hartshorne, Ph.D.

Associate Professor, Instructional Systems Technology

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Everyday: Then Education: Now

Analog

Tethered

Isolated

Generic

Consumption

Closed

David Wiley (BYU)

Typical Teacher Network

A. Couros

Everyday: Now Education: Future?

Digital

Mobile

Connected

Personal

Creating

Open

David Wiley (BYU)

Dan Pink, A Whole New Mind

Shift from paper to digital

Why Social Software?

Typical Teacher Network

A. Couros

Potential Teacher Network

A. Couros

What the research says:

50%10%75%80%96%71%35

hours

In education, though, it’s a

different story

Attitudes & Use: Faculty

Blogs (+)

Social networks:

improving student-student interactions (+),

improving student-faculty interactions (-)

Social Bookmarks (-)

However….the overwhelming majority stated that

they do not use, and do not plant to use.

Attitudes & Use: Students

Various Tools (+)

Social Bookmarks (-)

Used tools more than faculty, but not as

much as expected, and not in educational

contexts.

Seemed to recognize pedagogical

affordances of specific tools more

effectively than faculty.

Path Analysis

23

Perceived

Usefulness

Attitude

Subjective

Norm

Perceived

Behavioral

Control

Behavioral

IntentionBehavior

Perceived

Ease of use

Compatibility

Student

Influence

Peer

Influence

Superior

Influence

Self efficacy

FC-

Resources

FC-

Technology

*** Significance Less than 0.001

** Significance Less than 0.01

* Significance Less than 0.05

Factors: Faculty

Most Important: AttitudesVery significant: Perceived Usefulness

Significant: Compatibility

Still Significant: Perceived Ease of Use

Important: Perceived Behavioral ControlVery significant: Self Efficacy

Significant: Availability of Resources

Not significant: Availability of Technology

Not Important: Subjective NormsVery significant: Superior Influence

Significant: Student Influence

Not significant: Peer Influence

Factors: Students

Most Important: Attitudes

Very Significant: Perceived Usefulness

Significant: Perceived Ease of Use

Still Significant: Compatibility

Important: Subjective Norms

Very Significant: Superior Influence

Very Significant: Peer Influence

Not Important: Perceived Behavioral Control

Very Significant: Self Efficacy

Significant: Availability of Resources

Not Significant: Availability of Technology

So What?

…we as educators need to reconsider

out roles in students’ lives, to think of

ourselves as connectors first and

content experts second.

Will Richardson

IN*SITEnetwork

Thingiverse

Flexibility/Mobility

Personalization

Sharing (Kevin Kelly)

More of the Cloud

Generating (Kevin Kelly)

Future?

Richard Hartshorne, Ph.DAssociate Professor, Instructional Systems Technology

UNC-CharlotteE-mail: [email protected]

Skype: rhartsho49erVoice: 704.687.8711