rplp update: faculty development faculty 9-14... · 2014-10-22 · rplp faculty development ....
TRANSCRIPT
{
RPLP Update: Faculty Development
Anthony D Weaver MD September 17, 2014
He who studies medicine without
books sails an uncharted sea, but
he who studies medicine without
patients does not go to sea at all.
Sir William Osler, MD (1849-1919
The most common criticism made at present by
older practitioners is that young graduates have
been taught a great deal about the mechanism of
disease, but very little about the practice of
medicine – or, to put it more bluntly, they are too
“scientific” and do not know how to take care of
patients.
One of the essential qualities of the clinician is
interest in humanity, for the secret of the care of
the patient is in caring for the patient.
Francis W. Peabody, MD (1926)
“The secret of [learning to] care for the
patient is caring for some patients”
Anthony Weaver, MD (2014)
“I’m too busy to take a student!”
Vinson and Paden et al
found that the presence
of a learner adds on
average 45 minutes per
day (1994)
JAMA Internal Medicine Published online September 8, 2014
The mean time loss for
attending physicians was
−48 minutes per clinic
day (P < .001)
80% of respondents felt concern
regarding the adequacy of
number of clinical training sites
70% felt that developing new
sites was more difficult in 2013
than two years before
Key factors influencing the
ability to develop new sites were
security and legal requirements
and training and orientation of
preceptors
Majority of respondents felt the
number of available sites and
competition for sites have an
impact on enrollment capacity in
their programs
RPLP Faculty Development
Quarterly live sessions—Poor attendance
Semi-annual Conferences
Morehead FDC November 14, 2014
Lexington faculty development March 13-14, 2015
Monthly lunches – "drug rep" approach, targeted agenda
Feedback on evaluating students
"Ask Student Services" section at Morehead FDC
Administrative support
Clinic computers and licenses
Student background checks and credentials
Online student eval's + transcribed interviews
Current RPLP approach
“As you all should know, regular collaboration and communication between clerkship directors at different sites (i.e. Morehead and Lexington) is supposed to occur on a regular basis, and be documented.
This is an LCME regulation, and one in which several schools have gone on probation the last few years for not having such communication /collaboration.
THEREFORE I NEED EACH OF YOU TO PLAN ON ATTENDING THIS MEETING. If for some reason you cannot make it, please let me know which faculty member in your department will be representing your clerkship.”
From UK Administration
Dan Hunt, April 2014: The LCME is "very
uncomfortable" with students from different schools
being taught by the same faculty
different learning objectives for the same clerkship
expect clarification soon
Liason Committee on Med Education
Questions?
{
Campus Life: RPLP Admissions Boot Camp
May 2014
Shadowing quality/quantity
Extracurricular activities
Paucity of research
Interview skills
MCAT
Problems with rural applicants
Med school data analysis
Matriculants/applicants: UK COM (2009-’14) 35/138 = 25.4%
UL SOM (2009-’14) 32/121 = 26.4%
UPike KyCOM (2009-’14) 41/113 = 36.3%
TOTAL 108/372 = 29.0%
Med school data analysis
The bad news: Two NE AHEC counties (Menifee and Nicholas) had 0
applications to in-state medical schools from 2009-’14
From 2009-’14, 12 NE AHEC service counties had four or fewer matriculants to in-state medical schools
This includes Mason (four) and Montgomery (two)
From 2011-’14, NE AHEC ranked 4th, 5th, 6th, and 5th among KY’s eight regional AHECs for applications to the UK COM
Med school data analysis
The good news: Three counties with solid matriculation numbers to in-state
medical schools from 2009-’14: Greenup (28), Boyd (18), and Rowan (17)
Uptick in matriculation rate from 2009-’13 (28.0%) to 2014 (34.4%)
Primarily due to higher matriculation rate to UK: (22.7% from 2009-’13, 39.1% in 2014)
Kaplan talk
“Prior to the Medical School Admissions Boot Camp, I
was completely in the dark about the medical school
admissions process. After attending the workshops,
mock interviews, and discussions with current rural
physicians. I feel better prepared for the admissions
process.
This program has solidified my decision to enter
medicine and, more specifically, enter medicine in a
rural area. I’m confident in my abilities and now know
what to expect during the admissions process! I
couldn’t be more grateful for being given the
opportunity to participate in a program as exceptional
as this”
Faculty development
Student recruiting
Rural Health Elective – speaker scheduling
Guest Lectures
Graduate recruiting
This conference
Areas for Statewide Collaboration
Questions?