rpt on combined helicopter borne amag aem & avlf …

l

l

iii

; l

l 1

010

REPORT ONCOMBINED HELICOPTER BORNE

MAGNETIC, ELECTROMAGNETIC AND VLFSURVEY

BENNY PROJECT - PN-232 CARTIER AREA

ONTARIO

RECEIVED

| APR "5 1999

B MINING LANDS SECTION

l

l 1 l

FOR FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED

BYAERODAT LIMITED

February 17, 1989

J8885MNR

li i i i i ii iii l ll ll

l l

41113SEM19 2.12328 MUNSTER 010C

TABLE OF wv

1. INTRODUCTION 1-1

2. SURVEY AREA LOCATION 2-1

3. AIRCRAFT AND EQUIPMENT

3.1 Aircraft 3-13.2 Equipment

3.2.1 Electromagnetic System 3-13.2.2 VLF-EM System 3-13.2.3 Magnetometer ' 3-23.2.4 Magnetic Base Station 3-23.2.5 Radar Altimeter 3-33.2.6 Tracking Camera 3-23.2.7 Analog Recorder 3-23.2.8 Digital Recorder 3-43.2.9 Radar Positioning System 3-5

4. DATA PRESENTATION

4.1 Base Map 4-14.2 Flight Path 4-14.3 Electromagnetic Profiles 4-14.4 VLF-EM Total Field Profiles 4-2

5. INTERPRETATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5-1

APPENDIX I - General Interpretive ConsiderationsAPPENDIX II - PersonnelAPPENDIX III - Certificate of Qualifications

ll

l

l

l

ii lif

i i

LIST Of HAPS

(Scale 1:10,000)

MAPS:

1. AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES;

showing flight lines, fiducials and inphase and quadrature profiles of 33 kHz coplanar response.

2. VLF-EM TOTAL FIELD PROFILES;

showing flight lines, fiducicals, and profiles of VLF- EM response from NSS (Annapolis, Maryland) operating at

l 21.4 kHz.

Jli

1. INTRODUCTION

This report describes an airborne geophysical survey carried out on

behalf of Falconbridge Limited by Aerodat Limited. Equipment

" operated included a four frequency electromagnetic system, a high

l sensitivity cesium vapour magnetometer, a two frequency VLF-EM

system, a power line monitor, a video tracking camera, an altimeter

m and an electronic positioning system. Electromagnetic, magnetic

and altimeter data were recorded both in digital and analog form,

l Positioning data were stored in digital form, encoded on the VHS

it format video tape and recorded at regular intervals in UTM co

ordinates on the analog trace, as well as being marked on the

l flight path map by the operator while in flight.

l

l

l

l

l

i i i

A total of 1,255 kilometres of the recorded data were compiled in

map form of which 291 kilometres is presented in this report

covering claim groups in the following townships:

Stralak Munster Craig Hess Ulster Moncrieff

l l l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

JM

l

l

l

2. SURVEY AREA LOCATION

The survey area is depicted on the index map shown below.

82 00

Sir till

Cr..y

eft lin* r

vtMur i

f w I ff

Unit'

^

•oner if

t K""

M.M

Ermliflgi

Toiiffl

Himn

81

Hum

"J

C.r

Cue

If

Or

30 81

•r

^

*^

t*f

••fi

1

y

C*iAfi*r

Harty

Lt'*M

DOMIAO

Furftcflit

D*niiM

Tyr*A*

'0*

tMTf*A

l4lf*Wf

O*10M*A

Arintm

KtKHtAt

•OMII

Lw(W4*

IttyllM

In i or

fei 1 *r (

HW

V)

H*A

• li

ve

1'*

00

M

•r

wr

Vi

*?iM

^•r 1 1 H

Mtrnin

CtffMI

NrtBA

DBUR1Mtl IK

Bin

Aylivf

1.01 """'"

ttttCitini

^•IMA-vug*

OrrMO

Ci •KAfl

- *6 45

— 4 6 3 0

Ml. 000. 000

l l t* 3. AIRCRAFT AND EQUIPMENT

l3.1 Aircraft

J An Aerospatiale A-Star 350B helicopter, (CG-JIX), owned and

m operated by Lakeland Helicopters Limited, was used for the

B survey. Installation of the geophysical and ancillary equipment

B was carried out by Aerodat. The survey aircraft was flown at a

mean terrain clearance of 60 metres.

l3.2 Equipment

l 3.2.1 Electromagnetic System

m The electromagnetic system was an Aerodat 4-frequency

system. Two vertical coaxial coil pairs were operated at

l 935 Hz and 4.6 kHz and two horizontal coplanar coil pairs

at 4.2 kHz and 33 kHz. The transmitter-receiver

l separation was 7 metres. Inphase and quadrature signals

mm were measured simultaneously for the four frequencies

with a time constant of 0.1 seconds. The electromagnetic

l

i

l

bird was towed 30 metres below the helicopter.

3.2.2 VLF-EM System

System was a Herz Totem 2A. This instrument measures

the total field and quadrature components of two selected

transmitters, preferably oriented at right angles to one

i

liiiiiii ii i ii i i iil

3 - 2

another. The sensor was towed in a bird 12 metres below

the helicopter. The normal configuration of transmitting

stations monitored was NSS, Annapolis, Maryland for the

Line station and NLK, Jim Creek, Washington for the

Ortho station broadcasting at 21.4 and 24.8 kHz re

spectively. Station NAA, Cutler, Maine at 24.5 kHz was

also used and occasionally, combinations of the above

three were required.

3.2.3 Magnetometer

The magnetometer employed a Scintrex Model VI W - 2321

H8 cesium, optically pumped magnetometer sensor. The

sensitivity of this instrument was 0.1 nanoTeslas at a

0.1 second sampling rate. The sensor was towed in a bird

17 metres below the helicopter.

3.2.4 Magnetic Base Station

A Geometrics G-803 magnetometer was operated at the

base of operations to record diurnal variations of the

earth's magnetic field. The clock of the base station was

synchronized with that of the airborne system to

facilitate later correlation.

i l

lm

U

l fl l

El

l

3 - 3

3.2.5 Radar Altimeter

A King KRAI O A radar altimeter was used to record ter

rain clearance. The output from the instrument is a

linear function of altitude for maximum accuracy.

3.2.6 Tracking Camera

A Panasonic video flight path recording system was used

to record the flight path on standard VHS format video

tapes. The system was operated in continuous mode and the

flight number, real time and manual fiducial numbers were

registered on the picture frame for cross-reference to

the analog and digital data.

3.2.7 Analog Recorder

An RMS dot-matrix recorder was used to display the data

during the survey. In addition to manual and time

fiducials, the following data were recorded:

Channel Input

RALT Altimeter (150 m at top

of chart)

CXll 935 Hz Coaxial Inphase

CXQ1 935 Hz Coaxial Quadrature

CXI2 4.6 kHz Coaxial Inphase

Scale

3 m/rara

2.5 ppm/mm

2.5 ppm/mm

2.5 ppm/mm

l l

l

II,, . ^

1li F 1l-..

1 li ' 1MB

li1

li

1fi

|

1|:" l

f '

14"

liISj;.

^i|

Channel

CXQ2

CPU

CPQ1

CPI2

CPQ2

VLT

VLQ

VOT

VOQ

MAGF

MAGC

PWRL

4.6

4.2

4.2

33 *

33 y

VLF-

VLF-

VLF-

VLF-

Magn

Magn

Powe

3.2.8 Digital Recorder

An RMS DGR

tape. Inforn

Equipment

EM system

33 i

natioi

Magnetometer

VLF-EM

Altimeter

l l l l

3 - 4

Input

4.6 kHz Coaxial Quadrature

4.2 kHz Coplanar Inphase

4.2 kHz Coplanar Quadrature

33 kHz Coplanar Inphase

33 kHz Coplanar Quadrature

VLF-EM Total Field, Line

VLF-EM Quadrature, Line

VLF-EM Total Field, Ortho

VLF-EM Quadrature, Ortho

Magnetometer, fine

Magnetometer, coarse

Power Line Monitor

Scale

2.5 ppm/ram

10 ppm/mm

10 ppm/mm

20 ppm/mm

20 ppm/mm

2.5 %/mm

2.5 %/mm

2.5 %/mm

2.5 %/mm

2.5 nT/mm

25 nT/mm

n/a

Recording Interval

0.1 seconds

0.1 seconds

0.2 seconds

0.5 seconds

NAV System 0.2 seconds.

l l

3.2.9 Radar Positioning System

A Syledis SR3 UHF radio positioning system was used for

navigation and track recovery. A network of antennae

provided the pilot/operator with constant navigation

information, with a positional accuracy of i 5 metres.

il li

iii

i i i

ll *

I

II

4. DATA PRESENTATION

4.1 Base Map

l A topographic base map at a scale of 1:10,000 was prepared from

enlargements of Ontario Basic Mapping topographic maps

(originals at 1:20,000).

l4.2 Flight Path

The flight path was derived from the Syledis electronic

positioning system. It is estimated that the flight path is

m generally accurate to about 10 metres with respect to the

B topographic detail of the base map. The flight path is

presented with time and navigator's manual fiducials

l for cross reference to both the analog and digital data.

4.3 Electromagnetic Profiles

The electromagnetic data were recorded digitally at a sample

rate of 10/second with a time constant of 0.1 seconds. A two

8 stage digital filtering process was carried out to reject

major sferic events and to reduce system noise.

lM Local sferic activity can produce sharp, large amplitude

events that cannot be removed by conventional filtering

l procedures. Smoothing or stacking will reduce their amplitude

l

1l

l

l lm

l

l

l

l

lm

l

l

l

l

l

but leave a broader residual response that can be confused

with geological phenomena. To avoid this possibility, a

computer algorithm searches out and rejects major sferic events.

The signal to noise ratio was further enhanced by the ap

plication of a low pass digital filter. It has zero phase

shift which prevents any lag or peak displacement from occur

ring, and it suppresses only variations with a wavelength less

than about 0.25 seconds. This low effective time constant

permits maximum profile shape resolution.

Following the filtering process, a base level correction was

made. The correction applied is a linear function of time that

ensures the corrected amplitude of the various inphase and

quadrature components is zero when no conductive or permeable

source is present. The filtered and levelled data were then

presented in profile map form.

4.4 VLF-EM Total Field Profiles

The VLF-EM data from NSS (Annapolis, Maryland) operating at

21.4 KHz were presented in profile map form.

i * 5. INTERPRETATION

iThe geophysical results presented in this report indicate the exi-

J| stence and position of conductivity anomalies. The response will be

a maximum over the conductor, with the amplitude being related to

m the target's conductance and depth. Most of the surveyed blocks

m exhibit conductivity contrasts which may be interpreted as

structural features. However, a more detailed evaluation of the

l significance of the data presented should be performed by those

most familiar with the local geology and with access to additional

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

geological and geophysical information.

Respectfully submitted,

AERODAT LIMITED

fl February 17, 1989 Anthony E.Valentini

J8885MNR Geophysicist

l

l

l

i l

l

i

APPENDIX I

GENERAL INTERPRETIVE CONSIDERATIONS

l Electromagnetic

The Aerodat four frequency system utilizes two different trans-

" mitter-receiver coil geometries. The traditional coaxial coil

configuration is operated at two widely separated frequencies and

the lower frequency horizontal coplanar coil pair is operated at a

frequency approximately aligned with one of the coaxial frequencies.

The electromagnetic response measured by the helicopter system is

a function of the "electrical" and "geometrical" properties of

the conductor. The "electrical" property of a conductor is deter-

l mined largely by its electrical conductivity, magnetic suscepti

bility and its size and shape; the "geometrical" property of the

l response is largely a function of the conductor's shape and

M orientation with respect to the measuring transmitter and

receiver.

Electrical Considerations

For a given conductive body the measure of its conductivity or

conductance is closely related to the measured phase shift

between the received and transmitted electromagnetic field. A

small phase shift indicates a relatively high conductance, a

large phase shift lower conductance. A small phase shift results

l l

l

i i

- 2

l in a large inphase to quadrature ratio and a large phase shift a

low ratio. This relationship is shown quantitatively for a non-

| magnetic vertical half-plane model on the accompanying phasor

M diagram. Other physical models will show the same trend but

* different quantitative relationships.

lThe phasor diagram for the vertical half-plane model, as pre-

P sented, is for the coaxial coil configuration with the amplitudes

in parts per million (ppm) of the primary field as measured at

the response peak over the conductor. To assist the interpre -

U tation of the survey results the computer is used to identify the

apparent conductance and depth at selected anomalies. The results

l of this calculation are presented in table form in Appendix II

and the conductance and inphase amplitude are presented in symbo-

I lized form on the map presentation.

The conductance and depth values as presented are correct only as

l far as the model approximates the real geological situation. The

actual geological source may be of limited length, have signifi

cant dip, may be strongly magnetic, its conductivity and thick-

M ness may vary with depth and/or strike and adjacent bodies and

overburden may have modified the response. In general the conduc-

tance estimate is less affected by these limitations than is the

l l l l

Conductance in mhos is the reciprocal of resistance in ohms and

l in the case of narrow slab-like bodies is the product of elec-

m trical conductivity and thickness.

l l l l

depth estimate, but both should be considered as relative rather

than absolute guides to the anomaly's properties.

Most overburden will have an indicated conductance of less than 2

mhos; however, more conductive clays may have an apparent conduc

tance of say 2 to 4 mhos. Also in the low conductance range will

be electrolytic conductors in faults and shears.

The higher ranges of conductance, greater than 4 mhos, indicate

that a significant fraction of the electrical conduction is

electronic rather than electrolytic in nature. Materials that

conduct electronically are limited to certain metallic sulphides.

* and to graphite. High conductance anomalies, roughly 10 mhos or

l greater, are generally limited to sulphide or graphite bearing

rocks.

l Sulphide minerals, with the exception of such ore minerals as

sphalerite, cinnabar and stibnite, are good conductors; sulphides

may occur in a disseminated manner that inhibits electricall

l ll conduction through the rock mass. In this case the apparent

conductance can seriously underrate the quality of the conductor

l in geological terms. In a similar sense the relatively non-

j conducting sulphide minerals noted above may be present in

significant consideration in association with minor conductive

l sulphides, and the electromagnetic response only relate to the

minor associated mineralization. Indicated conductance is also of

l little direct significance for the identification of gold minera-

g lization. Although gold is highly conductive, it would not be

expected to exist in sufficient quantity to create a recognizable

l anomaly, but minor accessory sulphide mineralization could pro

vide a useful indirect indication.

l In summary, the estimated conductance of a conductor can provide

a relatively positive identification of significant sulphide or

graphite mineralization; however, a moderate to low conductance

l

l

value does not rule out the possibility of significant economic

mineralization.

Geometrical Considerations

m Geometrical information about the geologic conductor can often be

interpreted from the profile shape of the anomaly. The change in

l shape is primarily related to the change in inductive coupling

among the transmitter, the target, and the receiver.

l

l

l

ili

- 5

l In the case of a thin, steeply dipping/ sheet-like conductor, the

coaxial coil pair will yield a near symmetric peak over the

l conductor. On the other hand, the coplanar coil pair will pass

through a null couple relationship and yield a minimum over the

conductor, flanked by positive side lobes. As the dip of the

conductor decreased from vertical, the coaxial anomaly shape

changes only slightly, but in the case of the cpplanar coil pair

g the side lobe on the down dip side strengthens relative to that

on the up dip side.

s ^W

l As the thickness of the conductor increases, induced current flow

across the thickness of the conductor becomes relatively signifi

cant and complete null coupling with the coplanar coils is no

longer possible. As a result, the apparent minimum of the co

planar response over the conductor diminishes with increasing

m thickness, and in the limiting case of a fully 3 dimensional body

or a horizontal layer or half-space, the minimum disappears

I completely.

A horizontal conducting layer such as overburden will produce a

m response in the coaxial and coplanar coils that is a function of

altitude (and conductivity if not uniform). The profile shape

l will be similar in both coil configurations with an amplitude

ratio (coplanar:coaxial) of about 4:1*.

l

i;-fl|

I

l

l

i*i i i i i i i i i i

In the case of a spherical conductor, the induced currents are

confined to the volume of the sphere, but not relatively res

tricted to any arbitrary plane as in the case of a sheet-like

form. The response of the coplanar coil pair directly over the

sphere may be up to 8* times greater than that of the coaxial

pair.

In summary, a steeply dipping, sheet-like conductor will display

a decrease in the coplanar response coincident with the peak of

the coaxial response. The relative strength of this coplanar null

is related inversely to the thickness of the conductor; a

pronounced null indicates a relatively thin conductor. The dip of

such a conductor can be inferred from the relative amplitudes of

the side-lobes.

Massive conductors that could be approximated by a conducting

sphere will display a simple single peak profile form on both

coaxial and coplanar coils, with a ratio between the coplanar to

coaxial response amplitudes as high as 8*.

Overburden anomalies often produce broad poorly defined anomaly

profiles. In most cases, the response of the coplanar coils

closely follows that of the coaxial coils with a relative ampli

tude ratio of 4*.

i i

l

l

l

l

1

l

l

l

l

l

7 -

Occasionally, if the edge of an overburden zone is sharply

defined with some significant depth extent, an edge effect will

occur in the coaxial coils. In the case of a horizontal conduc

tive ring or ribbon, the coaxial response will consist of two

peaks, one over each edge; whereas the coplanar coil will yield a

single peak.

* It should be noted at this point that Aerodat's definition of

the measured ppm unit is related to the primary field sensed in

the receiving coil without normalization to the maximum coupledL

m ( coaxial configuration). If such normalization were applied to

the Aerodat units, the amplitude of the coplanar coil pair would

be halved.

Magnetics

The Total Field Magnetic Map shows contours of the total magnetic

field, uncorrected for regional variation. Whether an EM anomaly

with a magnetic correlation is more likely to be caused by a

sulphide deposit than one without depends on the type of minera

lization. An apparent coincidence between an EM and a magnetic

anomaly may be caused by a conductor which is also magnetic, or

by a conductor which lies in close proximity to a magnetic body.

The majority of conductors which are also magnetic are sulphides

containing pyrrhotite and/or magnetite. Conductive and magnetic

l

li l

l

8

I bodies in close association can be, and often are, graphite and

magnetite. It is often very difficult to distinguish between

these cases. If the conductor is also magnetic, it will usually

produce an EN anomaly whose general pattern resembles that of them

* magnetics. Depending on the magnetic permeability of the conduc

Ij ting body, the amplitude of the inphase EM anomaly will be wea

kened, and if the conductivity is also weak, the inphase EM

j anomaly may even be reversed in sign.

VLF Electromagnetics

U The VLF -EM method employs the radiation from powerful military

radio transmitters as the primary signals. The magnetic field

l associated with the primary field is elliptically polarized in

the vicinity of electrical conductors. The Herz Totem uses three

coils in the X, Y, Z configuration to measure the total field and

vertical quadrature component of the polarization ellipse.

I The relatively high frequency of VLF (15-25) kHz provides high

response factors for bodies of low conductance. Relatively "dis-

| connected" sulphide ores have been found to produce measureable

m V LF signals. For the same reason, poor conductors such as sheared

contacts, breccia zones, narrow faults, alteration zones and

l porous flow tops normally produce VLF anomalies. The method can

therefore be used effectively for geological mapping. The only

l

l

l

l ll relative disadvantage of the method lies in its sensitivity to

conductive overburden. In conductive ground the depth of explor

l ation is severely limited.

Jm The effect of strike direction is important in the sense of the

fl relation of the conductor axis relative to the energizing elec

tromagnetic field. A conductor aligned along a radius drawn from

j a transmitting station will be in a maximum coupled orientation

and thereby produce a stronger response than a similar conductor

at a different strike angle. Theoretically, it would be possible

H for a conductor, oriented tangentially to the transmitter to

produce no signal. The most obvious effect of the strike angle

l consideration is that conductors favourably oriented with respect

to the transmitter location and also near perpendicular to the

l flight direction are most clearly rendered and usually dominate

the map presentation.ll The total field response is an indicator of the existence and

position of a conductivity anomaly. The response will be a

l maximum over the conductor, without any special filtering, and

strongly favour the upper edge of the conductor even in the case

of a relatively shallow dip.

l

l

l

The vertical quadrature component over steeply dipping sheet-like

l l

i li i

- 10 -

l conductor will be a cross-over type response with the cross-over

closely associated with the upper edge of the conductor.

lM The response is a cross-over type due to the fact that it is the

'* vertical rather than total field quadrature component that is

l measured. The response shape is due largely to geometrical rather

than conductivity considerations and the distance between the

J maximum and minimum on either side of the cross-over is related

m to target depth. For a given target geometry, the larger thisl* distance the greater the depth.

iThe amplitude of the quadrature response, as opposed to shape is

l function of target conductance and depth as well as the conductiv

ity of the overburden and host rock. As the primary field

l travels down to the conductor through conductive material it is

m both attenuated and phase shifted in a negative sense. The secon

dary field produced by this altered field at the target also has

'l an associated phase shift. This phase shift is positive and is

larger for relatively poor conductors. This secondary field is

l attenuated and phase shifted in a negative sense during return

M travel to the surface. The net effect of these 3 phase shifts

determine the phase of the secondary field sensed at the

receiver.

l11

l A relatively poor conductor in resistive ground will yield a net

positive phase shift. A relatively good conductor in more conduc-

m tive ground will yield a net negative phase shift. A combination*

m is possible whereby the net phase shift is zero and the response

is purely in-phase with no quadrature component.m

A net positive phase shift combined with the geometrical cross*

l over shape will lead to a positive quadrature response on the

m side of approach and a negative on the side of departure. A net

negative phase shift would produce the reverse. A further sign

l reversal occurs with a 180 degree change in instrument orien

tation as occurs on reciprocal line headings. During digital

l processing of the quadrature data for map presentation this is

B corrected for by normalizing the sign to one of the flight line

* headings.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l.

i iii FIELD

Flown

Pilot

Operator

APPENDIX II

PERSONNEL

January, 1989

- Roger Morrow

- Steve Robinson

i i i iilli

OFFICE

Processing

Report

- Anthony E. Valentini

- George McDonald

- Anthony E. Valentini

* APPENDIX III

l CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS

.-•m Anthony E. Valentini

1. l am a geophysicist and have been working in this field since 1985.

fm 2. l reside at 48 Village Drive, Stoney Creek, Ontario.

l 3.1 hold an honours B.Se. in Geophysics from the University ofWestern Ontario having graduated in 1985.

4. l hold the position of Geophysicist at Aerodat Limited. I have been employed by Aerodat since July 1986.

B 5. l am a member of the Canadian Exploration Geophysical r. Society.

ll 6 . The accompanying report was prepared from a review of the^ a irborne geophysical survey flown by Aerodat for FalconbridgeJ Limited. I have not visited the property.

i: .

1 7. I have no interest in the property described nor do I hold any securities in Falconbridge Limited.

l . Signed,

l

l

l

Mississauga, Ontario Anthony E. ValentiniGeophysicist

Ontario41M3SETO19 2.12326 MUNSTER 900

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du D6veloppement du Nord et des Mines November 24, 1989

Mining Lands Section 880 Bay Street, 3rd Floor Toronto, Ontario M5S 1Z8

Telephone: (416) 965-4888

Your File: W8907-045 Our File: 2.12328

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and MinesBag 3000200 Brady Street, 6th floorSudbury, OntarioP3A 5W2

Dear Sir:

Re: Notice of Intent dated October 23, 1989 for Geophysical (Magnetometer and Electromagnetic) Survey submitted on Mining Claims S 993569 et al in Ulster, Moncrieff, Hess, Munster and Craig Townships.

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

W.R. CowanProvincial Manager, Mining LandsMines A Minerals Division

Enclosure

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining and Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

Falconbridge Ltd. Falconbridge, Ontario

Anthony E. Valentini Stoney Creek, Ontario

Michael J. Gray Sudbury, Ontario

ONtARIO QiOLOQICAL SURVEY

ASSESSMENT FILESOFFICE

NUV2& 1989

RECEIVED

Resident Geologist Sudbury, Ontario


Technical Assessment Work Credits

Ontario o*w

October 23. 1989

2,12328

-045

Recorded Holder

Township or AreaFALCONBRIDGE LTD.

ULSTER. MONCRIEFF. HESS. MUNSTER. AND CRAIG TOWNSHIPS.Type of curvey and number of

Assessment day? credit per claim Mining Claims AacxMd

Geophysical

Electromagnetic. 40

Magnetometer.

Radiometric

40

Induced polarization.

Other. ^^

-days

.days

.days

.days

.da yi

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological __________________days

Geochemical __________________days

Man days Q

Special provision Q

Airborne

Ground

993569993653 to 656 incl.9940961013391-921042317 to 63 incl.10423671042369 to 372 incl.10423781042388 to 392 incl.1042397-9810424001042461 to 467 incl.1042469-701042479 to 487 incl.1042946, 10429521046856 to 881 incl.1046885 to 914 incl.1046916 to 944 incl.

("l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Special credits under section 77 (161 for the following mining claims

10 days Airborne VLF+10 days Airborne Electromagnetic S 993568, 993570, 994048 1042368, 1042377, 1042387, 1046883-84.

20 days Airborne VLF * 15 days Airborne Electromagnetic S 830744 to 747 1ncl.

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

BQ not sufficiently covered by the survey

S 1042468 1042488 1042504

Q insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if neceiury in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not *Kimw*t *Ho**cd*t tallomi G*opftf**c*f - BO; Gco'ogoor -*O; G*ocrwmlc*( * 40; Section 77(191-CO.

'^~ 'Ministry otNorthern Development and Mines

ntaA^

JRv

Report of Work

(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures

Mining ActType of Surveytsl *- Ej^.t.n-toMntot4 e,r ,

Geophysical (Ajrborne Mag/Em)Claim Holder(s)

Falconbridge Limited

Page l of 5- Please type or print.

number of mining claims traversed xcecds space on this form, attach a list.

Note: - Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in t hi! "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

Do not use shaded arcns below.

(ft,e.4t*f46 , or Aroa

Benny -Cartier Arearospector's Licence Ro

AddressA 21647

P.O. Box 40. Falconbridge. Ontario POM ISOSurvey Company

Aerodat Ltd.DOU of Survey gjom ^o, J gg

Day J Mo. j Yr. j Day | Mo. | Vr. Name and Address of Author (of Goo-Technical report)

Anthony E. Valentini 48 Village Dr. .Stoney Creek, Ontario /y/E -.

Total Miles of line Cut

N/A

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

j SUDl1 "1!MX.

Man Days

Completi and ente

R EC E:reverse side

A. M.7!8!9I10HI)12|

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

' E lectromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

- Electromag letic

199?- Magnetomt ter

r. M.

' - Other , ,(J

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Days per Claim

—— — ——

Days per Claim

. ————— .

Days per Claim

40

-40-

Expenditures (excludes powerjtrjppjj;Type of Work Performed J& C V* C 1 V C \J

Performed on Claim(s) ' : ~ ^i : f ' f \ 19198*

MINING LANDS SECTIONCalculation o' Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S -h 1

Total Days Credits

5 =Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date - ,-

YfftfReco

Certification Verifying Report of Work '

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

SNumlicr

1042483

104246310424641042465

1042466

1042468

1042469

.J 042470

1042479

J04JA8Q....

1046857

1046858

1046859

1046860

1046861 .

.1Q46872

10468731046874

10468751046876

1046916

Expend. Days Cr.

80

808080

80

80

80

80

80

-BO-

80

8080

80

80

80

80

80

8080

-80

Ito U. 6-re^ /K- dirou* - fi- O^.DT.

Mining ClaimPrefix

SNumber

1046917

1046918

10469191046920

1046921

1046923

1046924

1046925

1046931

1046932

1046933

1046934

1046935

1046936

1046937

1046938

1046939

10469401046941

10469421046943

JQ46944. _

Expend. Days Cr.

80

80

8080

80

80

80

80

80

8080

80

8080

80

80

80

8080

8080

80

lotal number of mining claims covered by this log report of work. io^

lotal Days Cr. Date Recorded Recorded

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hcinto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Perton Certifying

__ Michael J. Gray 16-351 Uellington Hts,f Date Certif

Sudbury, Ontario P3E 3V8 | ? farf tftffied Certified by (Signature)

Ontarii

Ministry olNorthern Development

nd Mines

Report of Work '

(Geophysical. Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Page 2 of 5

Type of S urveyU"SUDBURY Mining Act

Instructions: Please type or print.- H number of mining claims traversed

oxcftccli space on this form, attach a l ist.Note: Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin (he "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

Do tint use shaded areas below.

R E C E l V E DClaim Holder(s)

Township 01 Arnn

Prospector's Licence

APR o- tebAddress

Survey Company

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Tcchnical report)

Date of Survey (from Si t o)

Day l Mo. | Yr, Dny l Mo. l Yr.


Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSnocial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This -- i ncludes line cutting)



Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits


Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

RfctWMMte ^VLF

Days per Clnini

———————

Days per Claim

——————

Days per Claim

40

40Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrc*ix

SNiirnticr

1046856104686210468631046864104686510468891046890104689110468921046893104689410468951046896

,1Q468?7..- 104690410469051046906

10423271042320104232910423301042331

Expend. Dnyc O.

8080808080808080808080808080808080

8080808080

rY* C*. K trying S reCiCklul ~(*r

tvtopWj^^ i t.*-t -

W Prefix

S

ining Clnini Number

104233210423331042334 10*2336104235710424001042481104248210424841042485104248610424871042488104250410468711046877 ^ 1046878

..104687 .9 , 104688010468811046883 *1046884 *1046922

Expend. Days Gr.

808080808080808080808080808080

-SO- SO

.10 8080"to

*fee-80

Total number of mining cl.iims covered by this report of work.

Date Recorded Holder or Agen

Certification Verifying Report of Work

FoTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Office Use OnlyDate Recorded

D&t* Approved os Recorded

^

Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowlcdgn of Ihn fncts set foith in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the nnnexed icport is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Dale Certified .

Atn-/ I'lM -

Ministry ofNorthern Development

nd Mines

Report of Work

(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Page 3 of 5Instruction!-, Please type or print.

If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form,attache list.

Note: - Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered

ci* \*A iV'OType of Surveyd)

Claim Holderd)

Address

Survey Company

SUDBURY—————— Ml.'il.'n G!'/. ——— — —

RECEIVE D

APR o - 190.1A. M. r'-".

7|8!911.0W|121i|?J1K!5!0

. in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Mining Act - DO nol usc ti,adcd areas below.

Township or Aica

Prospector's Licence No.

i-——-" ' f 1 " —— — - Uaie of Survey (from (b to) Total Miles of line Cut 1 "' U

j3".'tS y p' ' Day 1 Mo. 1 Yr. Day | Mo. | Yr.Name and Address of Author {of Geo-Techmc*l report)


For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This - includes line cutting)



Man Days


Airborne Credits


Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

RxHeimrtiii AM" r f

Days per Claim

——————

Days per Claim

——————

Days per Claim

40

40Expenditures (excludes power stripping)


Type of Work Performed

Performed on Ciaim(s)


Total Expenditures

S -f- 15

Total Days Credits

s

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

SNumber

1046926

10469271046928

10469291046930

1013391

1013392

1042317

10423181042319

1042320

1042321 ^ 1042322

1042323

104,2324.....

10423251042326

1042335

10423371042338

1042339

1042340

Expend. Days Cr.

8080

90 8080

80

80

80

8080

80

jBpM 80

80

80

80

80

80

8080

-80^

80' iv\AicrrnM.'Ys rt ft r ho rf 'i'""

C 1C" t.ipKij-'.ic O~( - -

Mining ClaimPrefix

SNumber

1042341

1042342104234310423441042345

1042346

1042347

1042348

1042349

10423501042351

1042352

1042353

48tj?iulUHtOJ J1042356

-10*2360,.., 10423611042362

104236310423671042368 *

Expend. Days Cr.

80

8080

8080

8080

80

80

8080

80

-,8JL-8R""{JO 8080

80

80

80

80

80a9w. otr

1 ot.il mi inlier of mining claim* covorotf by this report of work.


For Office Use OnlyTotal Days O. Recorded

Date Recorded

Date Approved es Recorded

Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hnreto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address o f Person Certifying

Onto Certified

of 5

© Ministry ol Report of Work Instructions: - Please type or print. Northern Development - H number of mining claims traversed

^^nd Mines (Geophysical, Geological, exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Ontark^A Geochemical and Expend lures) Note:- Only days credits calculated in the

3P? ^ Expenditures section may be entered fj 1 ^̂ l o . 'n | |M! "Expend. Days Cr." columns. ^•••' v p. —— ...... Mining Act .. Do not IISR shndud areas below.Type of Survey(s)

Claim Holdcr(s)

Address

Survey Company

•-i LJ LJ L5 IJ i -i JMI(Jli\!G l)!V.

"VM. - r~7j p.t tl l1f;in|J?|H?n|.'; !'il'': '

/Yj——--~-y

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)^ i l\ ' \ .

Township or Area

Prospi-r.ior's Licence No.

Date ol Survey (from 6 to)

Day | Mo. | Yr. j Day | Mo. | Vr.



For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This

- includes line cutting)



Man Days


Airborne Credits


Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

* Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

-Radiocoeiuc. MM p -

Days perClaim

——————

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

—4JL-

40


Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed



Total ExpendituresTotal

Oavs Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

SNun iltcr

10423691042370

...1Q42371.... 10423721042377 *10423781042387 *10423881042389

...1042390.. 1042391^104239^"^

104239810424611012462 . 1042467

.1046886 .. 1046887.... .. .1046888

. 1.046898.™ ...10.4.6899..

1046900

Expend,Dayt Cr.

808080

—80,

80*oee

80

80

8080

—SO- SO

.JO.Oft Ov

80...80., -80.

808.0—

..BO.. 80S^iSeTP!LSucJa!L'' -

Mining ClaimPrefix

SNumber

104690110469021046903 .. 104690710469081046909104691010469111046912

...1046913....... 1046914994096

....-1041952... 1042J16

-.9.93.5.6.9.... —193553. ...

..9936.5.4-. 993655

Expend. Days Gr.

808080808080808080

808080 80

-SJL. —SO-

SO

Totnl number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Date3* Recorded Holder or


For Office Use OnlyTotal Days O. Rccordnd

Date Recorded

Date Approved as Recorded

Mintnq HocorOor

Stanch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge ol the (acts set forth in the FlRporl of Work annexed IHMCIO, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion nnd the annexed repnit is true.


Date Certified

3

Ministry ofNorthern Development

id Mines

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Mining Act

Page 5 of 5Instructions: Please type or print.

— { f number of mining claims traversedexceeds space on thit form, attach a fist.

Note: - Only days credits calculated in the"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Surveyls)

Claim HolderU)

Township or Area

Address

lPrbipcctdr*i Ufconce~No.

Survey Company

Name and Address of Author {of Geo-Tochnical report)

Date of Survey (from ft to)

Day j Mo. | Yr, J Day j Mo. | Yr.



For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)



Man D

Cora ne

yj - ' -— ' ^^ tj LJ 1

F3 p* pi t-- t \idieie reVertfr^iafr. l V enter total (s) here

APR o ~ 19A. M.

7|fil?UO!ll|12Jl|2f

t

Airborne Credits


Geophysical

- Electr

- Magnc

- Radio

- Other

Geological

GeochemicJV ——, Geophytic

'E Q.^Q - Magn

SLK v/h-' Geological

omagnetic

tometer

metric

al

1

)magnetic

(ometer

metric

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

RO-K^H•tfVUF'

Days perClaim

Days per Claim

Days perClaim

an

40Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed



Total Expenditures

SInstructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

Date Recorded Holder


Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

S

'' . l

- .'. 'V . * -i

,. ' .' f.

Number

104686610468671046868104686910468701046885830744 *830745 -f

R3n?4fi *

830747

993568 *

993570

993656 —

994048

Expend. Days Cr,

808080808080

i*-AfrM c* o fldP W"

35 Afl

AIM-

20 8*

ZO&fl

-

4 t C*

' Mining ClaimPrefix

'

NumberExpend. Days Cr.

F. IvtAiiifTiurVtS rc.f.M,fA U.r Total number of mining fAr i^pHn^f co-C. - claims covered by this

report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Date Recorded

Date Approved as Recorded

Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowl/dge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.


Date Certifiod Certified

OWNS :HlR

! - ---L.-!--^ — - — L - __--

-C3350S i i aaiC4 v'-1 -8** 60 ft*

MONCRIEFF TWP. HESS TOWNSHIP

41M3SE88I9 2.12328 MUNSTER

Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern DevelopmentResources and Mines

Ontario

INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION

PUN

G~ 4090TOWNSHIP

MUNSTER

M.N.R. ADMINlSTRAnVE DISTRICT

SUDBURYMINING DIVISION

SUDBURYLAND TITLES/REGtSTBY DIVIS10H

SUDBURY

Scale 1:20 000

1000Metres

1000 2000

1000 Feet ST-

10OO 2000 3000 500* 60OO TOM SOO4 90OO^-i~~

10OOO:——i FM!

Contour Interval 10 Metres

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

URO- M ining Rights Only .SflO- Surface Righte OnlyM -*- S - Mining and Surface Rights

SYMBOLS Oncriptkm

Sec. 3Kb)

Disposition

26/2/88 M + SBoundary

Township, Meridian, Baseline.

Road allowance; surveyed... shoreline...

Lot/Concession; surveyed, unsurveyed

Parcel; surveyedunsurveyed

Right-of-way; roadrailway utility.

Reservation

Cliff, Pit, Pile............................

ConlourInterpolatedApproximateDepression...,.......................

Control point (horizontal)

Flooded land . ; ..........................

Mine head frame

Pipeline {above ground)

Railway; single track, double track abandoned

Road; highway, county, township access trait, tjush

Shoreline (original).

Transmission line

Wooded af'ea. .........,.. . .^...,........

WTE OF ISSUE

JUN 2 6 U86^^^^^

mmr. ^MHMB gECMpgrg flFHCE

NOTES

Flooding on Lower Onaping Lohe ond Nut Bay to contour elevation (H. O feel. LO. 9839 R le 3857

DiSPCSlTICM OF CROWN LANDSPatent

Surface S Mining Rights .................................... .0Surface Rights Only ........ .............,.................. .O

Mining Rights Only. .........................................®

LeaseSurface S Mining Rights ............ -....................... .H

Surface Rights Only ........ ....... .......... ........ IV..... .HMining Rights Only . . ....... ................................ .Q

Licence of Occupation ................,... .................... .T

Order-in-Council............................................. .OC

Cancelled .....................,............................. ©

Reservation...............:............. -.................... (D

Sand S Gravel....... .... . .................................... ©

/

Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources.

The disposition of lanti location of to! fabric and parcel boundarie* this index was compiled for administrative purposes only. <

ULSTER .JT.WP.

*n* its734696 . } S. 7J4697

*oo .' l i

' in \ l ftl V'/••:v v ; #v

i l zte l

41I13SE8819 S.12388 MUNSTER 210

-

6ajfi

161 r ^

-'.-\ r /^- "'-- ' :'^-\ " ^"- '' \' ^

rv^^o^^LTvv)r 43i ) i ' ' '.— . /X

''rO "" ' -^J-^ ' 4?S . -

J

^ L

TOFFLEMIRE.'-i . -'40*

X -:'-)

-i-

TOWNSHIP,——— -™-. -,-r- - . ---^- - ^. -

" l' \ --

S*

y-""

S

X^ r'

i..-^.....1 ^rB D C

"s.

44OOOOmE j^^

r-T-

1081*48* 9*46*

2O

7OWF 1 7

30

"50

Jfl

50 60 81*42* 4470OO-iE

Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern DevelopmentResources and Mines

Ontario

INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION

PLAN

G-2952TOWNSHIP

CRAIG

MJK.K. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

ESPANOLAMIPWING DIVISION

SUDBURYUIND TITLES/REGISTRY DIVISION

SUDBURY

Scale 1:20 OOO

1DM1=1*

100* 2DMHZl h

1000 F**t H l-*

1000 2OO* 3*00 4000 500* TOM •00*l—

9000 1*000

Contour Interval 10 Mrttrea

SYMBOLSBoundary


Road allowance; surveyed shoreline

Lot/Concession; surveyed, unsurveyed


Right-of-way; roadrailway utility.

Reservation

Cliff, Pit, Pile

ContourInterpolated ..........................Approximate Depression.

Control point (horizontal)

Roodedland............... -...---

Mine head frame ....... -.:... - - - - -......

Pipeline (above ground)

Railway; single track, double track abandoned

Road; highway, county, township access trail/bush


Transmission line

Wooded area............................

A

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSPatent

Surface ft Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only

LeaseSurface S Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only

Licence of Occupation ....

Order-in-Counctl.

Cancelled

Reservation..

Sand fi Gravel............

B .Q

.oc

. ©

DATE OF ISSUE

JUN16888suownr

tfffliig RECORDER? OFBCE


MRO- M ining Rights OnlySRO- Surface Rights OnlyM 4- S - Mining and Surface Rights

Order No. D*t*

ESZ.-SB/BO W 4/33 14/6/82 S RO. 157S

NOTES

—**E SUBDIVISION OF T HIS TOWNSHIP INTO LOTS AND CONCESSI

S ANNULLED AUGUST 21. 1 953.

f

IL V

x j i s /l 9.9O70*——J l 9157

CART!ER

4H13SEW19 2.12328 MUNSTER

.. . .. .. i J til j" v r. .

Ministry of ^y\ Natural

Resources Ciitario


SERVICE AJ*..-

3KDLX TO LAND DEPOSITION

PUN

G-4062TOWNSHIP

HESS

M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT


SUDBURYUNO TITLES/REGISTRY C.VISIGN

SUDBURY

1000

Scale 1:20 000

9 1000 2000Mvtrn M*tr*t

Contour interval 10 Metres

SYMBOLS.Boundary


Road allowance; surveyed...shoreline...

Lot/Concession; surveyed.


Right-of-way; roadrailway utility..

Reservation

Cliff. Pit, Pile ...................................... ———————

Contour .....................................,.... —— zo ———interpolated ....,........,......,............... - ————— —Approximate ................ 771"........"........ — ^-^ —Depression.....,............................... -^. ———-*

Control point (horizontal) ...................... ................ A

Flooded land......,............,.,................ ^HHHHHHHK:-!

Mine head frame ..,........................................... Q

Pipeline (above ground) .........................,,. ——— ———

Railway; single track............................... ——*————•~double track. abandoned..

Road; highway, county, township access trail, bush


Transmission line..

WDoded area......,............................... X

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSPatent

Surface i Mining RightsSurface Rights OnlyMining Rights Only......,.........................,....

v LeaseSurface S Mining RightsSurface Rights OnlyMining Rights Only............,...;....................

Licence of Occupation

Order-in-Council.

Cancelled

Reservation

Sand S Gravel....".".......................................

.H

.Q

.oc

. ©

.o


MRO - N&ning Rights OnlySRO- So-iace Rights OnlyM 4- S --Mining and Surface Rigr-.f

Description Order Ho. Date

W.59/BB.

Disposition

S. R. O.

Fif*

SUbDIVISIOH OF THIS TOWNSHIP - HiTO LOTS AND CONCESSIONS WAS PARTIALLY

ANNULLED APRIL 2lil. 1353 (LOTS? TD 12, CONS. 3 A ND 4, AND LOTS 5 TO 1 2

CONS. 5 AND G EXCEPTED.)

fr 41 f 7U

LSTE

R

TOW

NSH

IPG

-4II7

j——

S

c

Z

ecc

is l !s

g o: s tr s o:i D

g Z) gS

OD

S

QQ 5

CD

*

Q

g O

P

Ql

Z)

SZ

CO

i

CO 3

CO

* -

J7* ̂ ̂ "- -^ ——— .-AM-M^MA. I?

M.N.R. ADMIHISTRATIW KSTHICT


SUDBURYLAND TITUS/REGISTRY BIVISION

SUDBURY. MONCRIEFF

F*st

Contour Interval 10 Metres

1^- -*- t*

It-

SYMBOLSBoundary " *,

* Township1 , Meridian, Baseline.

Head allowance; surveyed.. - * shoreline.. V

Lot/Concession; surveyed

Parcel; sun*

unsurveyed

Rigttt-of-way; road ..* -railway

utility..

Reservation

Cliff, Pit, Pile..........

Contour Interpolated ApproximateDepression.........

Control point (horizontal) ...................................... A

Flooded land ...................................... --i~i-~-~-~-----i---~

Mine head frame .............................................. a

Pipeline (above ground) ...........,,-............... —— ——

Railway; single track j w............................ -1——'——l~^ ,. doubje track................ ; ............. -*——H——*

abandoned............................... -i— —'— —'

'Road; highway, county, township .................... ^-^^—-^access .V.... ..V?. .*'.f..................... ====--===

^-— -' trail,bush......................... ...*..... ——————

Shoreline (original).... .tT..... ..,................. .-•• 1 •"""•-•••-

Transmission k-t ,. -........,..............,....... - - *- ~ - *

Wooded area.

fr-*- -*.

C'^ ^** **" 7

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS.•"tJW*

PatentSurface A Mining Rights Surface Rights Only... Mining Rights Orrfy

LeaseSurface 4 Mining Rights Surface Rights Only....

' Mining Rights Only

Licence of Occupation ....

brder-in-Council.

Cancelled ............ *..

Reservation

Sand 4 Gravel............

.B U

©

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION -

MRO- Mining Rights Only SRO- Surface Rights OnlyM f S - Mining and Surface Rights

Description Ortfer No. Data Disposition

SEC 36/80 W 4, j? 14/6/12 S. B. Oei-* - ''"

8EC.SC/eO HN^W.Sa/M S .ft O

RI*

137*85

SAND AND QflAVEL

DHD eWMCL NttEKVC . *XC tto. 1*14* A 74444,

MTC OWWEL PIT H*. 4O5

MTC GRAVEL PIT No. 4C4O

O

2 m

\

i

on r

NOTES

H

t) SUMMVIMQN OF TtM

MTH JUME (Ml.

Z) 4OO FOOT SUHFfcCC MOHTS MEtERM*tlQM AROUND 4U.

LAKES AtC MVCM.

3) OOWE5 LAKE PCVELOPHMT PLAN OATtU IITH AWE tVTO.

PLE 1810*5.

WAAfMULLD

700CT1V(S .

1989SUDBURY

RECORDER'S OFFICE

-14-

Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources.

The disposition of land, location of lot fabric and parcel boundaries on. this index was compiled for administrative purposes only.

Q i

f

AERO

DAT

HEM/

MAG/

VLF

SURVEY

Th

is

map

w

as

com

pile

d

from

data

ob

tain

ed

du

rin

g

a helicopte

r m

ag

ne

tic

and

ele

ctr

om

agnetic

su

rvey

ca

rrie

d

ou

t by

A

er o

dat

Lim

ite

d.

The

four

frequency

EM

bird

was

t o

wed

at

an

a

l t i

t u

de

of

30m

i

the

cesiu

m va

po

ur

mag

net

orne

t e

r at

43

m,

and

l he

VLF

sen

sors

C

TOTE

M-2

A)

at

47m

. Th

e a

vera

ge flig

ht

lin

e

sp

acin

g

was

1 O

Orn.

N

avig

ation

and

flig

ht

path

re

co

ve

ry

were

e

ffe

cte

d

usm

g

a S

yle

diS

UH

F n

avig

atio

n

syste

m a

nd

a VM

S v

i deo

sy

s t e

m.

VL

F-E

M

PR

OF

ILE

S

Sta

tion;

NSS

(A

nn

ap

olis

, M

ary

lan

d)

21.4

kH

z

f r—

^

VLF

-EM

T

ota

l F

ield

In

tensity

(2.

5 X

/rrr

n)

Lane

MUQK?

lv*t

a**VM

W** 1*1111'

llfl**"*,*^

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED

VLF

-EM

P

RO

FIL

ES

o Q

Q

24

KH

z2.1

BENNY PROJECT -

PN 232

CARTIER AR

EA,

ONTARIO

AERODAT LIMITED

AE

RO

DA

T

HE

M/M

AG

/VL

F

SU

RV

EY

Th

is

map

w

as

co

mpile

d

fro

rnd

ata

ob

tain

ed

du

rin

g

a h

eiic

opte

r m

agne

t L c

an

d ele

ctr

om

ag

ne

tic

Surv

ey

carr

ied

ou

t by

A

er o

dat

Li

mi te

d.

The

fo

ur

fre

qu

en

cy

EM

bird

w

as

to w

e d

at

an

altitude

Of

30m

,

the

ce

sium

va

pour

mag

net

omet

er

at

43m

, an

d th

e

VLF

se

nso

rs

CTO

TEM

-2A

) at

47m

, T

he

ave

rag

e flig

ht

tin

e

sp

acin

g

was

10

0m.

Navig

ation

and

flig

ht

path

re

co

very

w

ere

eff

ecte

d

usin

g

a S

yle

dis

UH

F navig

ation

syst

em

an

d a

VMS

vid

eo

Sys

tem

.

VL

F-E

M

PR

OF

ILE

S

St a

t i o

n :

MSS

(A

nna

polis

, M

ary

land)

21

.4

KH

z

VLF

-EM

T

ota

l F

ield

In

tensity

C2.

5

X/r

rm)

82

00

81

00

46

30


2. 12

-EM PROFILES

24 KHz

BENNY PROJECT -

PN 232

CARTIER AREA, ONTARIO

O

330

660

SC

ALE

1:1

0,0

00

1320

26

40

Fee

t

100

JOG

500

1000

we;r

es

AERODAT LIMITED

DAT

EJA

N

'98

9

NTS

N

o:

41

| /i

3

MAP

N

lo:

2-V

PR

QF

C

LA

iMffi8

85-2

T

AE

RO

DA

T

HE

M/M

AG

/VL

F

SU

RV

EY

Th

is

map

w

as

com

pile

d

from

data

obta

ined

du

rin

g

a helic

opte

r m

agnetic

and

ele

ctr

om

agnetic

su

rve

y

carr

ied

out

by

Ae

rod

at

Lim

ited.

The

four

fre

qu

en

cy

EM

bird

w

as

low

ed

at

an

altitu

de

of

30m

,

the

ce

siu

m

vapour

ma

gn

eto

me

ter

at

43m

, an

d th

e

VLF

se

nso

rs

CTO

TEM

-2A

) at

47m

. T

he

ave

rag

e flig

ht

tine

spacin

g

was

10

0m.

Navig

ation

and

flig

ht

path

re

covery

w

ere

eff

ecte

d

usin

g

a S

yle

dis

UH

F navig

ation

Sys

tem

an

d a

VMS

v i d

eo

SyS

t em

.

EM PROFILES

Copi

anar

40

______

32______

32

ppm/

mmKH

z in

phas

e KH

z quadr at

ur e

82

00 F

AL

CO

NB

RID

GE

L

IMIT

ED

EL

EC

TR

OM

AG

NE

TIC

P

RO

FIL

ES

o3

2

KH

z

BENNY PROJECT -

PN 232


AERODAT LIMITED

41

M3

SE

ae

i9

2.1

23

28

M

UN

ST

ER

AER

OD

AT

HE

M/M

AG

/VLF

SU

RVE

YT

his

m

ap

was

com

pile

d

fro

m data

obta

ined

du

rin

g

a helicopte

r m

ag

ne

ttc

and

ele

ctr

om

ag

ne

tic

surv

ey

ca

rrie

d

ou

t by

A

ero

da

t Lirm

ted.

The

fo

ur

fre

que

ncy

EM

bird

w

as

to w

e d

at

an

altitu

de

O

f 30

rn

t th

e

cesiu

m

vap

ou

r m

ag

neto

me

ter

at

43m

, and

the

V

LF

se

nsors

C

TOTE

M-2

A3

at

47rn

. T

he

avera

ge

f figh

t lin

e

spacin

g

was

10

0m.

Navig

ation

and

flig

ht

path

re

covery

w

ere

effecte

d

usin

g

a S

yle

dis

U

HF

na

vig

atio

n

syste

m

and

a VH

S v

i deo

s yS

t em

.

Cop

l anar

40

ppm

/rrm

/"——

—S

32

KH

z t n

ph

ase

-._

....

..

32

KH

z q

ua

dra

ture

A fv

ta I^

M i

^^^^

^n^•


ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES

g

J 2

Q 9 a 32

KHz

BENNY PROJECT -

PN 232


o r^-

AERODAT LIMITED

MAP No:

2-UH CLAIMS J8885-2

41113558819 2,13328 MUNSTER

230

I.IC

S

AER

OO

AT

HE

M/M

AG

/VLF

S

UR

VE

YT

his

m

ap

was

co

mp

iled

fr

om

data

obta

ined

du

rin

g

a helicopte

r m

ag

ne

tic

and

ele

ctr

om

agnetic

su

rve

y

ca

rrie

d

ou

t by

A

ero

da

t Lim

ited.

The

four

frequency

EM

bird

w

as

tow

ed

at

an

a

ltitu

de

o

f 30

m

t th

e

cesi

um

va

po

ur

magneto

mete

r at

43

m,

and

the

V

LF

sen

sors

C

TOTE

M-2

A)

at

47rn

. Th

e a

vera

ge

flig

ht

lin

e

spacin

g

was

10

0m.

Na

vig

atio

n

and

flig

ht

path

re

co

ve

ry

wer

e e

ffe

cte

d

usin

g

a S

yle

dis

UH

F n

avig

atio

n

syst

em

an

d a

VMS

vid

eo

syst

em

.

EM

PR

OF

ILE

S

Gio

an

ar

40

ppm

/mm

_______

32

KHz

inph

ase

— ,..

. —

—

32

KHz

quadra

ture

82

00S

i 00

DBU

R

46

45

46

30

FALC

ON

BR

IDG

E

LIM

ITE

D

ELE

CTR

OM

AG

NE

TIC

P

RO

FIL

ES

32

KH

z

BE

NN

Y

PR

OJE

CT

- PN

232


SCAL E

1 = 10,000

O 33

0 66

0 '32

0 26

40

Feet

^____^____^________l

O

100

200

500

000

Me

lre

s

AERGDAT LIMITED

DA

TE

: JA

N

1989

NTS

N

o:

41

1/1

3

MAP

3-U

H

CLA

IMS

J8

88

5-3

H

N

AERODAT HEM/MAG/VLF SURVEY

This

ma

p wa

s compiled from d

ata

obtained during a

heli

copter

magnetic an

d el

ectr

omagnet t

c

survey carried ou

t. by

Ae

roda

t Li

mi ted.

Th

e f o

ur frequency EM

bird was

t owed at

an

a l t

i t u

de

of 30m

i ih

e cesium vapour

magnetometer

at 43m

r an

d th

e VL

F sensors CTOTEM-2A) at

47

m.

The

average fl

ight

li

ne spac

ing

wes

1 00m

. Na

vi gat i on an

d flight pa

th recovery were

e

1 f ect ed

us ing a

SyiediS UH

F navigation system an

d a

VMS

v i deo

Sy

st em.

VLF-EM PROFILES

Station: MS

S (A

nnap

olis

, Maryland) 21.4 kH

z

VLF-EM Tota

l Fi

eld

Intens

ity

(2. 5

Z7mm

)

f

' ± ~

IS o

if-j

*m*m*.

V S


VLF-EM PROFILES

KHz

BENNY PROJECT -

PN 232


, ..

?-: l- -

: --:!

; '.V

.-.V

Jj^V

SC

ALE

l:10

,000

LIM

ITE

DN

TS

No

: 4

1 l/M

3

3-V

PR

OF

CL

Atk

ffi8

85

-3

rpt on combined helicopter borne amag aem & avlf …

Documents