41M1SEM2e 2.14382 CREIGHTON 010

REPORT ON EMMA LAKE CLAIM BLOCK Creighton Township

ftfc

Falconbridge Ltd.(Exploration) G.K.C. Errington 06 264

Gill Stewart

APPENDIX

APPENDIX lFinancial Statement

APPENDIX 2Geochemical and Whole Rock Analyses Summary, Certificates and Cheque Copies

APPENDIX 3Statement of Qualifications

16

SUMMARY

This report covers twenty-four claims in Creighton Township, eight kilometres southwest of the town of Chelmsford, Ontario, The claims-S 995748 to S 995749 inclusive, S 995754 to S 995757 inclusive, S 995764 to S 995767 inclusive, S 995912 to S 995921 inclusive, S 1117288, and S 1117453 to S 1117455 inclusive- are held by Falconbridge Limited (Exploration). Linecutting and a geophysical survey were performed during the winter, and a geological survey including rock sampling was conducted between May 23rd and June 28th.

Gold was discovered in quartz veins on the property in 1885, and within six years a mine had been dug and a mill constructed. Seven diamond drill holes failed to intersect substantial mineralization however, and the mine shut down. Geophysics, geology and trenching were performed in 1929, and trenching to determine the nature of the neck -tuff contact was undertaken in 1989.

Two hundred samples were collected and submitted for whole rock or geochemical analysis; the results are enclosed.

The property straddles the contact between the granophyric unit of the Sudbury Igneous Complex and the Onaping Formation, composed of Neck, Grey and Black Members. The Neck is intrusive in nature and is present as continuous sheets and plugs. It has a fine to medium grained crystalline matrix and contains up to 809o granitoid and quartzite blocks. The Grey and Black Members are fragmental volcanic rocks identified using Fischer's classification. The Grey member contains chlorite is a greenish colour; the black is more carbonaceous and is grey to black in colour. The black is also clast-poorer and sulphide-richer than the grey. There are a variety of fragment types including angular altered andesite, rounded often block-sized granitoid and quartzite and angular buff coloured ash-sized fragments.

Structurally, the repetition of units in the central portion of the claim block is suggestive of a fold structure, and small scale features also support this interpretation. A strong foliation and lineation are evident in all units except the granophyre. Six possible faults have been identified base on field evidence and air photo interpretation. Jointing is most prominent in the granophyre, and quartz veins and gashes in the neck.

The most common alteration mineral is calcite, present as fracture fillings, foliation plane coatings, blebs and associated with quartz-feldspar clasts. Anomalous quantities of copper and/or zinc and/or nickel(greater than 100 ppm) are most concentrated in the ITUFb unit in the northern part of the block. Pyrrhotite is the primary ore mineral, but the numerous zinc anomalies imply the presence of sphalerite as well. Mineralization occurs as disseminations, stringers and blebs, and associated with clasts.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author would like to thank Dean Rogers, Jim Bald, Stuart Gibbins, Lori Kormos and Harold Gibson for their assistance.

11

41 l 11SEM2* 2.14382 CREIGHTON 010C

TABLE OF cuiN i urs i a

SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Section

I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Purpose of Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Location, Access and Terrain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Property Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31991 Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6History of Exploration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Rock Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

II. GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Regional Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Property Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Structural Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13Alteration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13Mineralization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Location map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Figure 2. Claim map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Figure 3. Map of the Sudbury Basin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

LIST OF PLATES

Plate 1. Bedding in ILTFb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Plate 2. Fluidal fragment in ILTFb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Table of Rock Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

EMMA LAKE CLAIM BLOCK

INTRODUCTION

Purpose of the Report

This document summarizes work performed on twenty-four claims in Creighton Township. Linecutting and a geological survey have been conducted on the claims for mineral exploration purposes and to conform with assessment work requirements. The geology of the property has been described, analytical results from rock sampling have been included and interpreted and a map summarizing this information has been provided.

Location, Access and Terrain

The claim block is located in western Creighton Township, concessions III and IV and lots 9 through 12. It is ten kilometres southwest of Chelmsford and is reached via a ten kilometer dirt track which branches west off of the Creighton Road. (Fig. 1) A four wheel drive truck can traverse the road in summer and fall, but a helicopter may be required for speedy access in the spring. Water access via the Vermilion River or Levey Creek is possible but not recommended.

Much of the property is low-lying and marshy, although there is a 300 meter high hill in the northeast corner. Emma Lake and Levey Creek cut through the southern claims and there are a few other small lakes and creeks scattered throughout the block. The area is generally forested although a number of clearings are encountered. Most of the outcrop is present as rolling hills and ridges trending around 060 degrees.

Property Definition

Again, the claim block consists of 24 claims, all held by Falconbridge Limited (Exploration), P.O. 40, Lindsley II Annex, Falconbridge, Ontario POM ISO. They are as follows:

S 995748S 995749S 995754-S 995757 inchS 995764- S 995767 incl.S 995912- S 995921 incl.S 1117288S 1117453- SI 117455 incl.(Fig.2)

/- ^v-^ lRayside-Balfour Town Municipality- -"———— -——.^- -.-T- -^V—— -(^V - -^ - ~

Waliden\Town Mtinicip&Iity'' ^ ^ -1- ,., ,-

: Figure 1. Location Map 4

CHEI

GH

10M

1M

b'

TTFA

IRB

AN

K

TWR

r.en

cr

j T

-52

*L(P

t "

i (B

r. ^"

H

? "^

f-2

'^;

"5^

' ^

1991 Program

Geological mapping and rock sampling were performed by Jill Stewart with assistance from Dean Rogers between May 23rd and June 28th. The project was supervised by James Cecchetto, Project Supervisor for Falconbridge Limited Exploration.

History of Exploration and Development

1885 - Gold discovered by J.R. Gordon at northern edge of current property 1887 - Creighton Gold Mining Company organized1892 - Shafts sunk, levels established, drifts dug and mill erected1893 - Main vein 17 feet wide, striking north and dipping 45 degrees east and yielding S4

to S207ton. Other showings located along strike1895 - seven diamond drill holes intersected two veins along a strike length of 1500 feet 1929 - Geology, trenching and geophysics performed by E.S. Moore for Gordon Lake

Mining Syndicate which optioned the property when Creighton Gold Mines wentbankrupt

1981 - Feasibility Study on Creighton Gold Mine performed by G. J. Hinse for CanterburyFinancial Services

1989 - Power stripping performed on behalf of Falconbridge Exploration by Andrew Tims.Trenches located in the southern part of the claim block adjacent to Emma Lake

Rock Sampling

Two hundred samples were collected on the grid, nine in the vicinity of the Creighton Gold Mine shaft and the rest on 100 metre centers throughout the claim block. One hundred and ninety were whole rock specimens analyzed for 26 oxides and elements using the ICP Method by Technical Services Laboratory in Mississauga. Nine were tested for gold using the same method, and one sample was analyzed for six metals by Swastika Laboratories in Swastika, using the atomic absorption technique. Anomolous values are highlighted on the accompanying certificates and map.

TABLE OF ROCK UNITS (Modified from legend by Stuart Gibbins et al)

MIDDLE PROTEROZOICOlivine diabase

EARLY PROTEROZOICSudbury Igneous Complex

Xenolithic GranophyreGranophyre

Diorite

Whitewater GroupChelmsford Formation

Onwatin FormationOnaping Formation

IDYKNeck

Black Member ITUF ILTF ILST

ITBX/HTBXTransitional black to neck

Grey MemberITUFILTFILST

ITBX/HTBX Transitional grey to neck

H-heterolithic I-intermediate DYK-dyke LST-lapillistone LTF-lapilli tuff TBX-tuff breccia TUF-tuff

GEOLOGY

Regional Geology(Precis of description found in Falconbridge Field Guide edited by P. Snajdr)

The Sudbury Basin is situated close to the intersection of the Grenville, Southern and Superior Structural Provinces. It consists of:

1. Sudbury Breccia in the Archean basement and Proterozoic cover peripheral to the Sudbury Igneous Complex.

2. Sudbury Igneous Complex, a neritic and granophyric body lining the base of the Basin. The Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide ore deposits are hosted by offset dykes of quartz diorite and a distinctive phase of the SIC known as Sublayer

3. The Whitewater Group, consisting of the Chelmsford, Onwatin and Onaping Formations, which fills the Basin

The Structure is roughly oval in shape and is about 190 kilometers in diameter. It has been dated at 1850 Ma and was produced by a catastrophic event, either a meteor impact or volcanic cauldera collapse.

The Onaping Formation, the lowermost formation of the Whitewater Group,consists primarily of fragmental adesite volcanic rocks and is approximately 53 km long, 17km wide and 1.7 km thick. The upper, granophyric member of the SIC intrudes the base of this formation, and the Emma Lake Claim Block straddles this contact.

Property Geology Unit Descriptions

Granophyre- well exposed ridges;large, smooth, rounded outcrops- light brown-pink weathered surface- medium to coarse grained quartz, plagioclase, amphibole and/or biotite, -(-/-potassium

feldspar- texturally and compositionally variable

Xenolithic Granophyre- light to medium brown-pink weathered surface- up to 109S light coloured, well rounded and well sorted lapilli and blocks averaging

5 cm in diameter- medium grained quartz, plagioclase, biotite and/or amphibole- contact with granophyre gradational

8

^H

F

alco

nbri

dge

Lim

ited

H

i In

co L

imit

ed*

Zn-

Cu-

Pb-

Ag-

Au

Dep

osit

E3

SS3

Sudb

ury

Igne

ous

Com

plex

WH

ITE

WA

TE

R G

RO

UP

^3 O

nwat

in/C

helm

sfor

d F

orm

atio

ns

t;!;;v;

j Ona

ping

For

mat

ion

Ona

ping

Falc

onbr

idge

Sudb

ury

15

Km

^

F

AL

CO

NB

RID

GE

LIM

ITE

D

l

Fig

ure

3.

M

ap of

the

B

asin

Neck- smooth ridges- intruded by SIC but boundary gradational; contact with tuffs sharp but irregular;

distribution often related to faults and photo lineaments; present as continuous sheets and plugs at base of, and as discrete bodies within tuffs

- light to medium brown-grey weathered surface- fine to medium grained plagioclase, quartz, 4-/-potassium feldspar, amphibole, + I-

chlorite and mica- 109& to 809& subangular to subrounded quartzite or granitoid fragments averaging 5

cm in diameter- distinct to diffuse fragment boundaries- large (m) bleached granitoid bodies ribboned with quartz associated with neck;

abundant large (m) quartz veins often present causing host rock to be silicified- generally massive unit but foliated adjacent to Onaping

Grey Member- both grey and black members mapped on the basis of size and percentage of fragments

using Fischer's classification for pyroclastic rocks- slabby outcrops; moderately to well foliated- light green-grey weathered surface, medium green-grey fresh surface- fine grained plagioclase,amphibole, biotite, chlorite, calcite, quartz eyes- identified as grey based on presence of chlorite- up to 80 Vo lapilli sized fragments averaging 0.5 cm in diameter- variety of fragment types: 1. angular altered andesite which can be difficult to

distinguish because they blend into the matrix 2.angular pink granitoid fragments 3.1arger, rounded quartzite and granitoid fragments 4 . angular buff coloured ash-sized clasts 5. chlorite blebs 6. mafic clasts with felsic reaction rims

- some fragments autobrecciated and fluidal

Black Member- more carbonaceous, clast-poor and sulphide-rich than grey- medium grey weathered surface; dark grey fresh surface; graphitic lustre close to

contact with grey and when strained- fine grained plagioclase, amphibole, biotite, calcite- pyrrhotite blebs, stringers and associated with clasts- up to 8096 lapilli sized fragments averaging 0.5 cm in diameter- variety of fragment types 1. angular altered andesite 2. larger rounded quartzite and

granitoid fragments 3. angular buff-coloured ash-sized fragments- outcrops with up to 209fc fragment type 3. observed; outcrops with up to 609fc found

to the east of the property- two outcrops exhibiting bedding with the same orientation as foliation encountered- uncertainty as to whether black or grey designation is appropriate usually occurs in an

area of strain where black is schistose and not as dark as usual-possibly due to silicification- and clorite may be present

10

Transitional tuff to neck- a wishy-washy term incorporating impure examples of both units- similar to neck in that large (averaging 5cm) rounded quartzite and granitoid fragments

are present but generally less abundantly than in proper neck (up to 1096); few smaller and possibly much larger (m) fragments in evidence

- similar to tuff in that matrix is fine grained and foliated; chlorite may be present

11

Plate 1. Bedding in ILTFb

Plate 2. Fluidal fragment in ILTFb

12

Structural GeologyThe distribution of units in the central portion of the claim block suggests a fold

structure. An ILTFb unit, an ILTFb?g? unit and another ILTFb unit repeat symetrically about a more competent breccia unit filling the core. The orientation of the structure conforms with small scale folds observed having axial planes of 043-061/78 and a hinge line of 060/06. Bedding is congruent with foliation so provides no further information. An alternative explanation for the repetition of the rock types is that thrust faulting has occurred and that structural stacking of the rock types is being observed. The virtual absence of brittle deformation features detracts from this theory.

A strong, consistent foliation striking 061 and dipping moderately to the south and a more variable lineation ranging from 140-180 degrees with a moderate plunge pervade the rocks. These features are well developed in the Onaping and weak to non-existent in the granophyre. All rock units are conformable with, and their contacts parallel to, this foliation.

Past geological work, photo lineaments and field evidence imply the presence of a number of faults. The tendency of neck to localize along zones of weakness suggests that a deformation zone runs parallel to Levey Creek and through the northern part of Emma Lake. Field evidence for this and other deformation include: small scale shears, faults and folds, flowage features and fluidal fragments, rolled and pulverized clasts, heavy weathering, schistose texture, crenulation cleavage, and abundant quartz veining and calcite. The most prominent feature identified on a airborne vertical gradient map extends from the center of the property north, and constitutes the locus for much of the mineralization. A fault running parallel to the foliation through a series of lakes in the middle of the claim group coincides with a splaying tongue of neck. The distribution of units suggests that three smaller faults involve displacement, both vertical and horizontal. A sequence of repeating units in the southwest portion of the property could be due to a series of thrust faults. A fault in the southwestern corner of the area could explain the unusual juxtaposition of units on either side of Levey Creek near the beaver dam.

Jointing is most prominent in the massive granophyre and quartz veins and gashes are most numerous in the neck .

AlterationCalcite is found in most of the rocks and is particularly abundant in zones of

deformation. It fills fractures, coats foliation planes and occurs as blebs and within and surrounding fragments. Chlorite occurs as blebs (cm) and fracture linings in the grey member. Silicification is evident in the neck unit and is related to emplacement of the quartz stockworks.

MineralizationMineralization is scattered throughout the claim group, but nowhere in great abundance.

Anomalous values on the map are concentrations of 100 ppm or greater of copper and/or nickel and/or zinc; the richest assay is a copper value of 790 ppm copper in the basal ILTFb unit. Anomalies of all metals occur sporadically in the neck or transitional rocks, generally close to contacts;this mineralization could be hydrothermally controlled. No high metal counts are present in the grey member, but there are a number in the ILTFb units and a high concentration in the ITUFb rocks in the northern part of the block. This zone of enrichment lies to the

13

northwest of a prominent structure running northnortheast from the center of the property, and emplacement could have preferentially occurred in its northern wall.

The most prevalent mineral is pyrrhotite, with traces of pyrite, but the numerous zinc anomalies in the ITUFb suggest that sphalerite is also present. Mineralization occurs as disseminations, stringers parallel to the foliation and discrete blebs, and associated with quartz/calcite clasts .

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Compton,R.R., Geology in the Field. J. Wiley Si, Sons, New York, 1985.

Gibbins, S. et al.,1988 SummaryiSandcherry/Vermilion Property, Falconbridge Ltd. Ex.

Gibbins, S. and Lori Nunes, 1989 Summary:Sandcherry/Vermilion Property, Falconbridge Ltd. Ex.

Hinse, G., Consultant's Report-Emma Lake, 1981.

Tims, A., Assessment Report-Emma and Moore Lakes, Falconbridge Ltd. Ex., 1989.

Field Guide:Sudbury Area Geology, Falconbridge Ltd. Ex., ed. P Snajdr, 1991.

Ontario Bureau of Mines, Vols 11,111 A IV, 1892-94.

Ontario Department of Mines, Vol 38,1929.

Ontario Geological Survey, GDIF 62, Creighton Township.

Maps:Airborne Geophysics 1:20000, Aerodat Ltd., Falconbridge Compilation.Ground Geophysics 1:5000, Emma Lake and Moore Lake grids, Val D'Or Geophysics, 1991,preliminary maps.

15

O 1.'"'EMMA LAKE STATEMENT OF EXPENSES

Geology Expenses

Salaries Field Supplies Equipment Rental Supply transport Analyses Food (fc Lodging Mob St. demob

Ground geophysics Lincutting

111111^^

S14,418.00 S13,351.00

May

S4,085.00 S750.00 S200.00

Sl.OOO.OO S103.00

Sl,355.00 S569.00

JUDS

S5,160.00 S75.00

S14.00 S833.00

Sl,757.00

s^KSTi-Sjjj^ofnfi^' ?;: : ;;:f *#s.?"*yy::i

July

S4,513.00

: : : : : : : : :if': :jj: : : : ij(?: :'t''i :V\rt" ':

;;:::f:^|JM|W::i-

August

Sl,520.00

SlOO.OO

S200.00 S150.00

^i||:^7lil;:: ;:' ;I;]M^i^;PQ;^

Established 1928

Swastika LaboratoriesA Division of Assayers Corporation Ltd.

Assaying - Consulting - Representation

Geochemical Analysis Certificate 1W-2849-RG1 company: FALCONBRIDGE LTD. EXPLORTATION Date: MAY-08-91Project: #264 - CR.ei***To ^ (S-o^ b ^iwEi Copy 1. 1977 MCKENZIE RD, RR#2, CHELMSFORDAttn: JAMES CECCHETTO 2. POM ILO

3. FAX TO 855-0333We hereby certify the following Geochemical Analysis of 9 ROCK samples submitted MAY-06-91 by .

Sample Au Number ppb40951"""" ~~"~"~-c5~

40952 ^40953 *340954 ^40955 5540956 ---~-------

40957 ^40958 ^40959 ^

Certified by

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK1TO Telephone (705)642-3244 FAX (705)642-3300

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED

f -3 i tika u a bo r at or f P . U. Box 10 /"~ Swastika. On tar- i o f P0K 1T0

ggf Olj^gl s t ra t i on Num ber

Falconbridge Explo 1977 Mckenzie Road Chelmsford, OntariHOM1L0

VOUCHER -j .j Q fra NUMBER Z. T O D O.es

ACCOUNT

1^1^1/1^1^101

MM

(III

MM

: ^ Jlf j-V

1 ,, ,

1

l

t

-u^a^ i oi oi si

VENDOR 9/JTta 0 NUMBER ^^Oc^L

COST CENTRE

^itfi^i2i^rf

3 /A

APPROVED

'^^K^C-^- '

y (-^ s/sty s*

MilMMMM

l l l lQST

Si

Vft"**

AMOUNT

f^iJO

6 A?4

OitftRENCY

A/PAY

-/f/ITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT f DESCRIPTION G P

'-^^^^TF076 9 1 ^^r^:: Au Assays

9 1 V '- Sample hand 1 ir3

g 3

CR

'

- -

CHECKED

4VOICE

i 24858

05--08-91

1 of 1

UNIT PRICE AMOUNT " :

8.000 72.00 2.700 24.30

CertttlW-2849-RBl tt2643-BST 7 V., Excluded 6.74

COMMENTS

Net 30 DaysTOTAL f

103.04

THIS VOUCHER SHOULD BE DETACHED AND RETAINED BY PAYEE NQ.Q04436 NO.DICE DATE

MO. D. YR>

Q5/Q8/9. 05^10/91 O 24/91

INVOICE NUMBER

248582486624945

REFERENCE

TOTAL

AMOUNT

103.041 .662.78

512.69

2,278.51

TOFALCONBRIDGE CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCESUDBURY EXPUJMnoN 1 16 CEDAR STREETSUDBURY EXPLOMTION SUDBURY QhfTARIO P3E 1 B4

PAY TO THE ORDER OF

- SWASTIKA LABORATORIES P.O. BOX 10 SWASTIKA ONTARIO

POK 1TO

PER

PER f/ -

No 004863VOUCHER NO.

OO4436

VENDOR NO.

?Oft?

DATE

06/05/91

riCD r\c

AMOUNT

$2 l ?78.51

$? f ?78.fi1GENERALACCOUNT

Falconbridge Limited

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

Established 1928

Swastika LaboratoriesA Division of Assayers Corporation Ltd.

Assaying - Consulting - Representation

of

de

Geochemical Analysis CertificatePage l of 2

1W-3135-RG1

company: FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED (SUDBURY)Project: 06-264Attn: D. ROGERS/J. STEWART

Date: JUN-19-91 Copy 1. 1977 McKENZEE RD., GENERAL DELIVERY,

2. RR#2, CHELMSFORD, ONT. POM 1LO3. FAX TO 855-0333

We hereby certify the following Geochemical Analysis of 50 ROCK samples submitted JUN-17-91 by .

Sample NumberSA41951 SA41952 SA41953 SA41954 SA41955SA41956 SA41957 SA41958 SA41959 SA41960

SA4196I SA41962 SA41963 SA41964 SA41965SA41966 SA41967 SA41968 SA41969 SA41970SA41971 SA41972SA41973 SA41974 SA41975SA41976 SA41977 SA41978 SA41979 SA41980

Au Cu ppb ppm

7 9 ^ 15 ^ 17 ^ 9 ^ 7

^ 16 ^ 26 ^ 20 ^ 31 ^ 14^ 34 ^ 15

5 ^ 7

^ 9 7 8 ^ 16^ 12 7 11^ 34 ^ 43 C5 910 59 ^ 13^ 14 ^ 15 ^ 14 ^ 33 10 49

Zn ppm51 35 60 19 686 80 35 4632

^60)

26 3534 19 23 25 1551 26 22 54 1633 22 25 76 26

Pb ppm

5 2 1 12

143

1 7 1

61 45

1 11 3 1 1 84 3 4 2 32 2 1 7 2

Ag ppm0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10. l 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

Ni ppm38 53 46 21 10

39 28 17 49 4019 61 34 25 43

36 31 36 44 2947 432344 3047 39 41 50 33

whole rock analaysis results to follow

Certified by-

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK1TO Telephone (705)642-3244 FAX (705)642-3300

Established 1928

Swastika LaboratoriesA Division of Assayers Corporation Ltd.

Assaying - Consulting - Representation

Geochemical Analysis CertificatePage 2 of 2

1W-3135-RG1

Company: FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDProject: 06-264Attn: D. ROGERS/J. STEWART

(SUDBURY) DateCopy 1. 1977 MCKENZIE RD.,

2. RR#2, CHELMSFORD

: JUN-19-91GENERAL DELIVERY,, ONT. POM 1LO

3. FAX TO 855-0333We hereby certify the following Geochemical Analysis of 50submitted JUN- 17-91 by .

Sample AuNumber ppbSA41981 ^SA41982 ^SA41983 ^

j SA41984 ^*SA41985 ^

SA41986 ^SA41987 ^SA41988 ^SA41989 ^SA41990 ^

SA41991 ^SA41992 ^SA41993 ^SA41994 ^SA41995 ^

SA41996 ^SA41997 ^SA41998 10SA41999 ^SA42000 ^

Cuppm

6355876

d^2729133712

910677

4915751918

Znppm

1428563524

2732233227

3339277636

1869463271

ROCK samples

Pbppm

41534

2212,1

414

314

11126

Agppm0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1O.i0.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.10.1

Nippm

1730564548414244354349323656472837585051

whole rock analaysis results to follow

Certified fry

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK1TO Telephone (705)642-3244 FAX (705)642-3300

FALCON B RI DC E____THIS VOUCHER SHOULD BE DETACHED AND RETAINED BY PAYEE No 004575 No. OG50Q/

^ MO. D. VOG/18/.J06/19/91

/19/91U6/19/9106/19/9106/20/9106/24/9106/27/9106/28/91

v .

INVOICE NUMBER——————— 25104 —— ——2511325120251212512725146251592619425221

REFERENCE

TOTAL

AMOUNT——————— 1 , 048. 92

915.92902.65665.11

83.1413.86

698.39360.27641.36

5,929.62 J

TOFALCONBRIDGE CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE

116 CEDAR STREETSUDBURY EXPLORATION SUDBURY, ONTARIO P3E 1B4

PAY TO THE ORDER OF SWASTIKA LABORATORIES P.O. BOX 10 SWASTIKA ONTARIO

POK 1TO

PERri*

PER

No. 005002VOUCHER NO.

004575

VENDOR NO.

2082

DATE

07/08/91

r\co r\c

AMOUNT

$5,929.62

15,929.62

GENERALACCOUNT

Falconbridge Limited

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

1:0061 a- : 00^018050*

Laboratories f"-O. ox 10Swastika, Ontario P0K 1T0

Number: R 100294743

Falconbridge Exploration 1977 Mckenzie Road RR#2 Chelmsford, Ontario POM1L0

SHIP TO:

Same

INVOICE

NO.:

DATE:

PAGE:

25146

06-20-91

l of l

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA. ONTARIO

L4W 1A2(416) 625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROM Falconbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzie Rd., General Delivery R.R. #2Chelmsford, Ontario POM lLO

REPORT No.

M9207

SAMPLE(S) OF PulpINVOICE #: P.O.:

D. Rogers/J. Stewart PROJECT: 06-264

SA40960 SA40961 SA40962 SA40963 SA40964

SA40965 SA40966 SA40967 SA40968 SA40969

SA40970 SA40971 SA40972 SA40973 SA40974

SA40975 SA40976 SA40977 SA40978 SA40979

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 08/91

S ppm

500300300200300

600500300200500

200600500200200

200200

Agppm

Mo ppm

-ao

CTA

SIGNED

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department.

Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this reportPage l of

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A2(416) 625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROM Falconbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzie Rd., General Delivery R.R. #2Chelmsford, Ontario POM lLO

REPORT No.

M9207

SAMPLE(S) OF PulpINVOICE #: P.O.:

D. Rogers/J. Stewart PROJECT: 06-264

SA40980 SA40981 SA40982 SA40983 SA40984

SA40985 SA40986 SA40987 SA40988 SA40989

SA40990 SA40991 SA40992 SA40993 SA40994

SA40995 SA40996 SA40997 SA40998 SA40999

S ppm

400500300

Ag ppm

Mo ppm

(5500/

200500400200300

300200400300400

300200300200200

-ao

10

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 08/91SIGNED

CTA

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department. Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this report.

Paoeage 2 of 3

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA. ONTARIO

L4W 1A2(416) 625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROM Falconbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzle Rd., General Delivery R.R. #2Chelmsford, Ontario POM lLO

SAMPLE(S) OF

REPORT No.

M9207

PulpINVOICE #: P.O.:

D. Rogers/J. Stewart PROJECT: 06-264

SA41000

S ppm

200

ppmMo ppm

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 08/91SIGNED

CTA

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department. Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this report. Page 3 of 3

FALCONBRIDGE

PROJ:06-264

1W-3134-RG1

SWASTIKA

J ^ORATORIES

P.O.

BOX 10,

SWASTIKA. ONTARIO

PHONE #:

(705

) -

642

- 3244

FAX #:

(705)

- 64

2 - 3300

I.C.A.P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lithium MetaBorate Fusion

REPORT No

.

Page

No.

File No

.

Date

lM920/

l of

2

JN25RA

JUN-26-1991

Oxides in

*

- Minors ppm

SAMPLE #

SA40960

SA40961

SA40962

SA40963

SA40964

SA40965

SA40966

SA40967

SA40968

SA40969

SA40970

SA40971

SA40972

SA40973

SA40974

SA40975

SA40976

SA40977

SA40978

SA40979

3A40980

3A40981

SA40982

3A40983

SA40984

SA40985

SA40986

SA40987

SA40988

SA409S9

SA40990

SA40991

SA40992

SA40993

SA40994

9100.3

6|l0

0.4

0p

p

|l0

0.4

3p

P99

.2 "

""""

98

.59

;

I02100.6

4

98.7

9 10jl

00.2

7

14

8.;

i6is

aPP

Pib

TS

L/9

1SI

GNED

FALCONBRIDGE

PROJ:06-264

1W-3134-RG1

SAMPLE #

SA40995

SA40996

SA40997

SA4099S

SA40999

SA41000

SWASTIKA

I ^ORATORIES

P.O. BOX 10

, t-ftSTIKA, ONTARIO

PHONE *:

(705)

- 642

- 3244

FAX #: (705)

- 642

- 3300

I.C.A.P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lithium MetaBorate Fusion

REPORT No

. : M920/

Page

No.

: 2

of 2

File No

. :

JN25RA

Date

: JUN-26-1991

Oxide* in *

- Minors ppm

P2

05

||pif

*

Mnt

iiss

ppoi

TSL/91

SIGNED

J

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A2(416) 625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

SAMPLE(S) FROM

SAMPLE(S) OF

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Falconbridge Limited (Sudbury) 1977 McKenzie Rd., General Delivery R.R. #2Chelmsford, Ontario POM lLO

Pulp

REPORT No.

M9209

INVOICE #: P.O.:

D. Rogers/J. Stewart PROJECT: 06-264

SA41951 SA41952 SA41953 SA41954 SA41955

SA41956 SA41957 SA41958 SA41959 SA41960

SA41961 SA41962 SA41963 SA41964 SA41965

SA41966 SA41967 SA41968 SA41969 SA41970

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 08/91

S ppm

300200300200200

800200300600299

ppmMo ppm

500200200

300300200200400

SIGNEDCTA

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department.

Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this report.Page l of 3

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A2 (416)625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROM FaiCOnbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzie Rd., General Delivery R.R. #2Chelmsford, Ontario POM lLO

REPORT No.

M9209

SAMPLE(S) OFPulp

INVOICE #: P.O. :

D. Rogers/J. Stewart PROJECT: 06-264

SA41971 SA41972 SA41973 SA41974 SA41975

SA41976 SA41977 SA41978 SA41979 SA41980

SA41981 SA41982 SA41983 SA41984 SA41986

SA41987 SA41988 SA41989 SA41990 SA41991

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 08/91

S ppm

200700200400300

300 200 300 300

X

Agppm

Mo ppm

300300600200300

200200200200200

CTA

SIGNED

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department.

Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this reportPage 2

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A2(416) 625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROM FaiCOnbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzie Rd., General Delivery R.R. #2Chelmsford, Ontario POM lLO

REPORT No.

M9209

SAMPLE(S) OFPulp

INVOICE #: P.O.:

D. Rogers/J. Stewart PROJECT: 06-264

SA41992 SA41993 SA41994 SA41995 SA41996

SA41997 SA41998 SA41999 SA42000

S ppm

300200200200700

ppmMo ppm

(2500

400

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 08/91SIGNED

CTA

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department.

Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this report. Page 3 of 3

l FA

LCO

NB

RID

GE

PRO

J:06

-264

1W-3

135-

RG

1

SWASTIKA

J ^ORATORIES

P.O. BOX 10,

iwASTIKA, ONTARIO

PHONE #:

(705)

- 642

- 3244

FAX #:

(7

05)

- 64

2 -

3300

I.C.A.P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lithium MetaBorate Fusion

REPO

RT N

o.

Page

N

o.

Fil

e N

o.

Dat

e O

xide

s in

S

: M

92G

*

: l

of

2 :

JN26

RB

: JU

L-0

2-19

91

- M

inor

s pp

n

SAMPLE #

SA41951

SA41952

SA41953

SA41954

SA41955

SA41956

SA41957

SA41958

3A41959

SA41960

SA41961

3A41962

SA41963

SA41964

SA41965

SA41966

SA41967

SA41968

SA41969

SA41970

3A41971

SA41972

SA41973

SA41974

SA41975

SA41976

SA41977

SA41978

SA41979

SA41980

SA41981

3A41982

SA41983

SA41984

SA41986

Zr

ppm

j

19

6f,

(

1 5

fr

PO

97.9

8il

p

( 5*

:;Xpgl0

0.1

9lf

S

loll

!!!

98.4

2111

98.9

3:;;,

-;*

100.

27*1

98

.42}

99.5

5K

97.8

21

TS

L/9

1SI

GN

ED

l FA

LCO

NBR

IDG

EPROJ:06-264

1W-3135-R01

SWASTIKA

J ^ORATORIES

P.O. BOX 10

, i-

rtST

lKA,

ONTARIO

PHONE #:

(705)

- 642

-

324

4 FAX #

: (7

05)

- 642

- 3300

I.C.A.P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lithium MetaBorate Fusion

REPORT No.

Page

No.

File No

.

Date

Oxides in

: 2

of 2

: JN26RB

: JUL-02-1991

- Minors ppm

SAMPLE

3A41987

SA41988

SA41989

SA41990

3A41991

SA41992

SA41993

3A41994

9A41995

3A41996

SA41997

3A41998

3A41999

3A42000

TSL/91

SIGNED

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A2(416) 625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROMFalconbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzie Rd., General DeliveryR.R. #2Chelmsford, OntarioPOM lLO

REPORT No.

M9322

SAMPLE(S) OF INVOICE #: P.O.:

PROJECT: 06-264

SA41851 SA41852 SA41853 SA41854 SA41855

SA41856 SA41857 SA41858 SA41859 SA41860

SA41861 SA41862 SA41863 SA41864 SA41865

SA41866 SA41867 SA41868 SA41869 SA41870

Ag ppm

<10 <10

Mo

<10 <10

<10

<10 <10

<10 <10

<10 <10 <10 <10

20 <10 <10 <10 <10

<10

<10 <10

<10 <10

<10 <10

<10 <10

<10 <10 <10 <10

S ppm

500500500400400

500700400500800

400500500400500

400500500400700

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 18/91SIGNED

CTA

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department.

Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this report.Page l of 5

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A2(416) 625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROM

SAMPLE(S) OF

Falconbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzie Rd., General DeliveryR.R. #2Chelmsford, OntarioPOM lLO

Pulp

REPORT No.

M9322

INVOICE #: P.O. :

PROJECT: 06-264

Ag ppm

SA41871 SA41872 SA41873 SA41874 SA41875

SA41876 SA41877 SA41878 SA41879 SA41880

SA41881 SA41882 SA41883 SA41884 SA41885

SA41886 SA41887 SA41888 SA41889 SA41890

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 18/91

^0 <10 <10

-CIO <10

Mo ppm

-clO <10 <10 ^0 <10

<10 <10 <10

<10 <10

^0 <10 -clO <10 <10

^0 <10

<10

<10 <10 <10

<10

<10 <10 <10

<10 <10 <10

S ppm

60050070012001300

700600

2000700500

600500

1300500

4100

900500500

4400700

SIGNEDCTA

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department.

Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this report.Page 2 of 5

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION O F B URGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A2(416) 625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROM

SAMPLE(S) OF

Falconbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzie Rd., General DeliveryR.R. #2Chelmsford, OntarioPOM lLO

Pulp ^^ ^^

REPORT No.

M9322

INVOICE #: P.O. :

PROJECT: 06-264

Ag ppm

Mo ppm

SA41891 SA41892 SA41893 SA41894 SA41895

SA41896 SA41897 SA41898 SA41899 SA41900

SA41901 SA41902 SA41903 SA41904 SA41905

SA41906 SA41907 SA41908 SA41909 SA41910

<10*clO <10

*c!0 <10 <10 ^0 <10

^0 <10 <10*:10 <10

^0 <10 <10

<10 <10 <10

<10

<10 <10 <10

<10

<1010

<10

<10

<10

<10 10 10

S ppm

700500500500300

700400500

2300500

400600

200020001300

2000500

100010001700

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 18/91SIGNED

CTA

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department.

Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this report. age 3 of 5

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPR ISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A2 (416)625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROM

SAMPLE(S) OF

Falconbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzie Rd., General DeliveryR.R. #2Chelmsford, OntarioPOM lLO

Pulp ,^

REPORT No.

M9322

INVOICE #: P.O. :

PROJECT: 06-264

SA41911 SA41912 SA41913 SA41914 SA41915

SA41916 SA41917 SA41918 SA41919 SA41920

SA41921 SA41922 SA41923 SA41924 SA41925

SA41926 SA41927 SA41928 SA41929 SA41930

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 18/91

Ag ppm

<10 <10 <10*:10 <10

<10 <10 <10*:10 <10

Mo ppm

<10 -clO <10 <10 <10

<10

<10 <10 <10

<10<10 <10

<10

*clO <10 <10

10 <10 <10

<10

<10

<10 <10 <10

S ppm

5001000100020001700

65001100230038002700

24003300130030002700

160021001400400600

SIGNED

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department. Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this report.

CTA

.ge 4 of 5

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION OF BURGENER TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED

1301 FEWSTER DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A2(416) 625-1544 FAX: (416) 625-8368

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

SAMPLE(S) FROM

SAMPLE(S) OF

Falconbridge Limited (Sudbury)1977 McKenzie Rd., General DeliveryR.R. #2Chelmsford, OntarioPOM lLO

Pulp__^^___^__^_____^_________

REPORT No.

M9322

INVOICE P.O.:

PROJECT: 06-264

SA41931 SA41932 SA41933 SA41934 SA41935

SA41936 SA41937 SA41938 SA41939 SA41940

SA41941 SA41942 SA41943 SA41944 SA41945

SA41946 SA41947 SA41948 SA41949 SA41950

COPY: INVOICE:

Jul 18/91

Ag ppm

<10 <10

<10

<10*:10*:10 <10

<10 <10

<10 x:10

<10 <10

Mo ppm

<10 10 10 10

10 <10 10 10 10

<10 <10 <10 <10

<10 ^0

<10 <10 <10 <10

S ppm

80040014002700700

1000700500

45003600

4004001700200300

300300300300200

SIGNEDCTA

For enquiries on this report, please contact Customer Service Department. Samples, Pulps and Rejects discarded two months from the date of this report. ge 5 of 5

lFALCONBRIDGE

PROJ:06-264

1W-3355-RG1

SWASTIKA T~BORATORIES

P.O. BOX 10

, ^..ASTIKA, ONTARIO

PHONE #:

(705

) -

642

- 3244

FAX #:

(7

05)

- 64

2 -

3300

I.C.A.P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lithium MetaBorate Fusion

REPORT No

. :

M93*..~

Page

No.

: 3

of 3

File No

. :

JL17R

Date

: JUL-18-1991

Oxides in

t

- Minors ppai

SAMPLE

SA41921

SA41922

3A41923

9A41924

SA41925

3A41926

3A41927

SA41928

SA41929

SA41930

SA41931

SA41932

3A41933

SA41934

SA41935

SA41936

3A41937

3A4193B

SA41939

SA41940

3A41941

SA41942

3A41943

SA41944

3A41945

SA41946

SA41947

SA41948

SA41949

3A41950

m

100.

8310

0.9

98

.44

98

.498

.91

3.1

01

i!8

s8

* 0

.53

8B

*SQ

O

.US

OU

Ha

34O

:

TSL

/91

SIG

NED

FALC

ON

BR

IDG

EPROJ:06-264

1W-3355-R01

SWASTIKA L

PR

ATOR

IES

P.O. BOX 10

, SwtSTIKA, ONTARIO

PHONE #:

(705

) -

642

- 3244

FAX #:

(7

05)

- 642

- 3300

I.C.A.P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lithium MetaBorate Fusion

REPORT No

.

Page

No .

File No

.

Date

Oxide* in

:

: M932*

: 1 of 3

: JL17R

: JUL-18-1991

V - Minors ppm

SAMPLE #

SA41851

3A41852

SA41853

SA41854

SA41855

SA41856

SA41857

3A41858

SA41859

SA41860

SA41861

SA41862

SA41863

3A41864

SA41865

3A41866

3A41867

3A41868

SA41869

SA41870

SA41871

SA41872

3A41873

SA41874

SA41S75

SA41876

3A41877

SA41878

SA41879

SA41880

SA41881

SA41882

SA41883

SA41884

SA41885

320gl||

69.1

4 11

.51;

60

.22

12.7

81

5a.B

8 12

.31V

::62V

9| 1

3.25

Sviz

is''!

12.14

8

5.4

6

9.5

3

9-

56

ai 0

6::M

08

0.89

4.

16

4.34

v 3.

22-

4.82

'2:6

7

5.09

4.

44^4

.21

3.75

V

4.76

3.83

1 5.

6lil

3.

49a

2.46

0.8

0: 1

.54

0.43

0.54

0.52

J 0.

60

i 0.

51;;

o; 10

0.21

one

0.10

0.0

10

0.14

0.

020:

0.

1& 0

.02f

i 0.

IS:

0.02

0 0.

14

O.:0

15

27

4li

l50

45

0i:

.10

8

TS

L/9

1SI

GNED

FALCONBRIDGE

PROJ

:06-

264

1W-3

355-

RG1

SWASTIKA

T yORATORIES

P.O. BOX 10,

..-A

STIK

A, ONTARIO

PHONE #:

(705)

- 642 - 3244

FAX #: (705)

- 642 -

3300

I.C.A.P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lit

hium

Met

aBor

ate

Fus

ion

REPORT No

.

Page

No.

File No

.

Date

Oxides in

: 2

of 3

: JL

17R

: JUL-18-1991

- Mi

nors

pp

m

SAMP

LE #

3A41886

3A41

887

SA41888

SA41

889

SA41

890

3A41

891

SA41

892

SA41

893

SA41

894

SA41

895

SA41896

SA41

897

SA41898

SA41

899

SA41

900

SA41

901

SA41

902

SA41

903

3A41

904

SA41905

3A41906

SA41907

3A4190S

SA41909

SA41910

SA41

911

SA41

912

SA41913

SA41

914

SA41

915

SA41

916

SA41

917

SA4191S

SA41919

SA41

920

86

6:||jf|

|

6721

311!

l60m

jiM

. 1

96

Pll

|l8

194p;ii0

; 1

66

lilifi

162|

49

2?i

228i

;;:p5

i2;:|4

l i6

6jjS

m'iH

l 24

8WK

g:2

23

2li

'*^

210M

J|5i

f

60.6

3 12

.C

3:60

,131

12.

^62

.91

11.;

!A

6QV9

| 1

1.'

5*bv

6| 1

2.C

5.06

Vv;

:4.3

04.3

6l;

;4-;.

44

4.54

Vt4

?*34

5.2

liM

43

5.3

2tl

i4l7

l

S.O

Oi

3.8

8,

*) Q

ft-':':;

3.11

?!

3.2

ll:

1V90

1-38

0.51

:::;0

v26

o.5o

;iq.2

40.

46Ji

:0;.2

40.

4 sfip 29

:0

.49

|ij6

i2i

0.14

0.

015

0.14

-0.0

15

0.12

^0;O

Kt

0.12

jO:.b

l5j

Co

ifftf

PP

*S

25lf

p|l0

0.5

6.......

....

soia

iiiio

o. 99.4

581*1

20-S

lpplO

O. S

KS

SB

s

:!il|l|2

98.3

0l;|iP

TS

L/9

1SI

GN

ED

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, Jill K. Stewart, of Toronto, Ontario hereby certify that:

1. I graduated from Queen's University with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Geological Sciences in 1986.

2. I am a geologist employed on contract by Falconbridge Limited (Exploration), 1977 McKenzie Road (General Delivery, RR#2) Chelmsford, Ontario POM 1LO.

3.1 have been practising my profession for five years and have been actively involved in geological work for six years.

4. I have no financial interest in these claims or Falconbridge Ltd.

5. I conducted this geological survey.

Dated at CL/r^tad this 2 2 M day of /W^/ ,1991

17

VAL D'ORGEOPHYSIQUE

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYproperty of

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDMOORE LAKE l EMMA LAKE Project

Balfour TownshipProvince of Ontario

May 1991

G. Lambert R. Turcotte

SERVICES EN LEVES GEOPHYSIQUES - GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES50, boul. Lamaque, VAL D'OR (Quebec) J9P 2H6 T6I. : (819) 825-6529 Fax : (819) 825-1342

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Table of contents..........................................iIntroduction.................................... . . . . . . . . . . . lProperty, location and access..............................lGeophysical work...........................................lSurvey specification.......................................2Results and interpretation.................................3Conclusion and recommendations.............................5Certificates.............................................6-7

LIST OF MAPS;

DRAWING NO. MAGNETIC SURVEY

Moore, Emma Lake W-E l 1 .1

Moore, Emma Lake W-E / 1 .2

Total field contours

Total field profiles

DRAWING NO. H.E.M. SURVEY

Moore, Emma Lake W-E f 3 .2

Moore, Emma Lake W-E l 3 .3

Moore, Emma Lake W-E X 3.4

444 Hz

1777 Hz

3555 Hz

QvO

-1-

INTRODUCTION

In March 1991, a magnetic survey and electromagnetic H.E.M. survey were carried out on a property owned by FALCOMBRIDGE LIMITED, MOORE LAKE f EMMA LAKE Project, in Balfour Township, province of Ontario.

These surveys were designed to locate structures favorables favorable for gold or base metal deposition.

PROPERTY. LOCATION AND ACCESS

The property is located approximately 2 km South of the town of Chelmsford, in Balfour Township, province of Ontario.

The property is easily accessible by secondary road south of Chelmsford.

The property claims have been registered with the Ontario Department of Natural Resources and the numbers are presented on the figure #1 of this report.

GEOPHYSICAL WORK

A total magnetic field and electromagnetic H.E.M. surveys were carried out on part of the property between March 25th and 31th, 1991 for MOORE LAKE and March 1st to 27th, 1991 for EMMA LAKE.

A total of 15.7 km on EMMA LAKE and 44.0 km on MOORE LAKE were covered by the magnetic and electromagnetic H.E.M. surveys. Instruments used was the EDA OMNI-PLUS proton precession magnetometer and APEX PARAMETRICS MAXMIN I system.

GvO

-2-

SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS

The geophysical surveys were carried out along a network of Northwest - Southeast picket lines cut at 100 metres intervals. The lines were chained and stations marked at 25 metres intervals.

The magnetic readings were taken with a proton precession magnetometer recording simultaneously the value of the total magnetic field with a precision of 0.1 gamma. The readings were taken systematically every 12.5 metres.

A base station magnetometer measuring the variation of the total magnetic field at 20 seconds intervals was used as a reference for correction of the diurnal variation.

The electromagnetic survey was carried out using a MAXMIN I, which was used in the horizontal loop mode with a 100 metres separation between the transmitting and receiving coils. Reading were taken at 25 metres intervals along the lines.

The instrument is capable of operating on nine different frequencies of which 444, 1777 and 3555 Hz were selected. In this type of survey, both in phase and out of phase components of the secondary field are measured and are recorded as percentages of the primary field.

QvO

-3-

RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION

MOORE LAKE

The magnetic profiles indicate that in a background level of about 58250 30 gammas, a series of low-amplitude disturbances were traced. All are oriented NE-SW and appear to be caused by shallow (^Om), thin magnetic units of highly variable susceptibilities. They also appear to be somewhat discontinuous (pinch and swell?) along strike. This magnetic relief is probably diagnostic of a sedimentary or felsic host rock containing mafic volcanic flows and/or gabbro sills.

As for the MAXMIN H.E.M. survey, there does not appear to be any true bedrock conductor of metallic nature. The only conductive phenomena that we have identified are either electrolytic and probably reflect the relief of the bedrock surface or at best they are responses due to poorly-connected stringers of sulphides or graphite in possible stuctural planes. None of the H.E.M. signatures can be attributed to massive metallic mineralization in the first 50 to 60 metres.

We have tentatively traced a N-S fault cross-cutting the stratigraphy in the area of l1900E-12000E.

-4-

EMMA LAKE

The magnetic relief shows a generally quiet background of 58300 100 gammas. This background is perturbed by one main area of magnetic activity, centered on 6900E/7600N and extenting from 6200E to 7500E and from 7200N to 7900N along a NE-SW trend. This phenomenon reflects the presence of mafic rocks very near surface ( < 1 0m) over a fairly wide zone. It cuts off suddenly at its West end, around 6200E, possibly because of a fault.

A number of other less prominent units of increased magnetism were also outlined. They are thin and occur at shollow depths. Most strike NE-SW except in the NW, where ESE-WNW strikes dominate.

The MaxMin H.E.M. survey, although locally influenced by topographic effects, clearly indicates that no truly massive metallic conductors were detected. As in the case of the Moore Lake survey discussed above, the only conductive phenomena that we have identified are either eletrolytic and reflect the relief of the bedrock surface, or at best, they are responses due to poorly-connected stringers of sulphides or graphite in possible structural planes. None of the H.E.M. signatures can be attributed to massive metallic mineralization in the first 50 to 60 metres.

A few zones of higher resistivity indicate narrow corridors of outcropping bedrock flanked by low-resistivity valleys partly filled with overburden material.

Gs/O

-5-

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The geophysical investigations which were performed on the MOORE LAKE and EMMA LAKE projects have allowed the mapping of mafic units hosted by low-magnetism sediments of felcis rocks. These rocks do not appear to contain any significant conductors of metallic composition.

With only the present geophysical data at hand, we can only recommend that detail mapping and prospecting/sampling, be carried out on both grids. An air photo lineament study should also be done. The probable amount of outcrop should allow a good understanding of the geology.

An induced polarisation survey may help in mapping poorly conductive metallic concentrations which the MaxMin cannot adequately map.

A proper study of the present data in the light of a compilation of all known geoscientific information should provide a number of stuctural targets and possibly help in rating the significance of the conductors identified by the MaxMin survey.

Respectfully submitted VAL D'OR GEOPHYSIQUE LTEE

By:

And By:

Geraia Lambert, Consulting Geop

Ing.

Q/0

GERARD LAMBERTGEOSCIENCES Societe de consultation et de genie-conseil en geophysique.

-6-

CERTIFICATE

I, undersigned, Gerard Lambert, P. Eng., certify that:

I reside at 679 Muroch ave, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, since 1983.

I am a graduate f o Universite Laval, Quebec where I have obtaned a B.Se.A. in Geological engineering in 1978.

I have been engaged in Exploration Geophysics since 1972 and have been practicing as a professional engineer since 1978.

I am a member of the Order des Ingenieur du Quebec since 1978.

I am a member of the Quebec Prospector Association, the Prospector A. Developers Geophysicist, the European Association of Exploration Geophysicists and the Canadian Tnstitute of Mining ft Metallurgy.

This report is based on the information contained in the survey described. The interpretation of the data was made using methods known in the literature and based on my personnal experience.

I have not received, nor do I expect ot receive directly or indirectly any interest in the claims that belong to FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED.

Rouyn-Noranda, this May 21, 1991

/UGJ.OXU Lambert^ ^^ Consulting Geophysic~ist

679, avenue Murdoch, Rouyn-Noranda (Quebec) Canada J9X IH7 Telephone: (819) 762-3182 Tetecopieur: (819) 762-5364

-7-

CERTIFICATE

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT:

I am a resident of Val d'Or, province of Quebec, since 1977.

I am a technologist graduated from "College du Nord-Ouest", Rouyn, Quebec in 1977.

I have been actively engaged in geophysical exploration since 1977 and have acquired a wode range of experience in geophysical methods and techniques.

I am a member of "Corporation professionnelle des Technogolues des Sciences Appliquees du Quebec" and also a member of the Quebed prospectors association and f the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

I do not hold nor do I expect to receive an interest of any kind in these claims held by FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED.

Signed in Val d'Or, this May 21, 1991.

By:Robert Turcot

REPORT ON MOORE LAKE CLAIM BLOCK

Creighton Township

Falconbridge Ltd. (Exploration) J.K.C. Errington 06264

Jill Stewart

SUMMARY

This report covers eight claims in Creighton Township, six kilometers south of the town of Chelmsford, Ontario. The claims-S 995783 to S 995790 inclusive- are held by Falconbridge Limited (Exploration). Linecutting and a geophysical survey were performed during the winter, and a geological survey including rock sampling was conducted between July 24 and August l.

The property was trenched and diamond drilled in 1929 but no information on this work is available. In 1943 a prospector submitted a report to Falconbridge in which he identified sphalerite, galena, pyrite and pyrrhotite mineralization, and the government maps indicate a sp- gn-py showing on the northeast shore of the lake south of the river.

Seventy-one samples were collected and submitted for whole rock or geochemical analysis; the results are enclosed.

The property straddles the contact between the granophyric unit of the Sudbury Igneous Complex and the Onaping Formation, composed of Neck, Grey and Black Members. The Neck is intrusive in nature and is present as continuous sheets and plugs. It has a fine to medium grained crystalline matrix and contains up to 8096 granitoid and quartzite blocks. The Grey and Black Members are fragmental volcanic rocks identified using Fischer's classification. The Grey member contains chlorite is a greenish colour; the black is more carbonaceous and is grey to black in colour. The black is also clast-poorer and sulphide-richer than the grey. There are a variety of fragment types including angular altered andesite, rounded often block-sized granitoid and quartzite and angular buff coloured ash-sized fragments.

There seem to be no major faults are folds on the property although the rocks often appear disrupted close to contacts. A strong foliation and lineation are present, and the topography and rock units are conformable with the former. Jointing and quartz veining are abundant in both the neck and the granophyre.

The most common alteration mineral is calcite, present as blebs and associated with quartz-feldspar clasts. Pyrrhotite is found in almost every ITUFb locality as disseminations, stringers and associated with the same quartz-feldspar fragments. Traces of galena and pyrite are also in evidence.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author would like to thank Dean Rogers, Jim Bald, Stuart Gibbins, Lori Kormos and Harold Gibson for their assistance.

11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

LISTS OF FIGURES, PLATES AND TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Section

I. Purpose of Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Location, Access and Terrain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Property Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31991 Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3History of Exploration and Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Rock Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

II. GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Regional Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Property Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Structural Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13Alteration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13Mineralization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Location map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Figure 2. Claim map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Figure 3. Map of the Sudbury Basin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

LIST OF PLATES

Plate 1. Rimmed block in ILTFb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

Plate 2. Interfingering of neck and ITUFb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Table of Rock Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

MOORE LAKE CLAIM BLOCK

INTRODUCTION

Purpose of Report

This submission summarizes work performed on eight claims in Creighton Township. Linecutting and a geological survey have been conducted on the claims for mineral exploration purposes and to conform with assessment work requirements. The geology of the property has been described, analytical results from rock sampling have been included and interpreted and a map summarizing this information has been provided.

Location. Access and Terrain

The claim block is situated in northeastern Creighton Township, concession V, lot 4. It is six kilometers due south of Chelmsford and is reached via a five kilometer dirt track which extends south from the Creighton Road.(Fig. 1) A four wheel drive truck can reach the lake in the spring, summer and fall, and boat access is possible via Levey Creek from Whitewater Lake.

The land north of the lake and river is high and gently rolling hills slope down to the water. To the south much of the property is grassy and/or marshy in the vicinity of the water; the rounded ridges and hills rising from this lowland have good exposures of outcrop and are well treed. The hills and ridges- even the massive granophyre to the south- trend 060 in accordance with the foliation.

Property Definition

Again, all of the claims are held by Falconbridge Limited (Exploration), P.O. 40, Lindsley II Annex, Falconbrige, Ontario POM ISO. They are as follows: S 995783- S 995790 incl.(Fig. 2)

1991 Program

Geological mapping and rock sampling were performed by Jill Stewart with assistance from Dean Rogers for eight days between July 24 and August 1. The project was supervised by James Cecchetto, Project Supervisor for Falconbridge Limited (Exploration).

History of Exploration and Development

1929 - Trenching/stripping done. No further information available1943 - Prospecting unearths a shear zone with quartz stringers and silicified tuff

mineralized with galena and sphalerite. Examination of core from old diamond drillholes reveals weak pyrite and pyrrhotite mineralization.

.j s

- i K

''

S^l

c-^

i ^^

A ^^ ^

^R A

l^^i J

^?

l g

- -f

fi- ^

^P

J®^

t

O) ,

' 00

.0)

00

0)

O l'

Ministry of Natural Resources map indicates sp-gn-py occurrence on northeast shoreof lake

1885 - Gold discovered by J.R. Gordon at northern edge of current property 1989 - Digging of seven trenches in northwest corner of claim block supervised by Andrew

Tims. As with Emma Lake operation nature of boundary between neck and tuffsought. Nine samples taken

Rock Sampling

Seventy-one samples were collected at 100 meter intervals on the grid. Sixty-nine were whole rock specimens analyzed for 26 oxides and elements using the ICP Method by Technical Services Laboratory in Mississauga. Two were tested for six metals by Swastika Laboratories in Swastika using the atomic absorption technique. Anomalous values are highlighted on the accompanying map and certificates.

TABLE OF ROCK UNITS (TABLE 1)(Modified from legend by Stuart Gibbins et al)

MIDDLE PROTEROZOICOlivine diabase

EARLY PROTEROZOICSudbury Igneous Complex

Xenolithic GranophyreGranophyre

Diorite

Whitewater GroupChelmsford Formation

Onwatin FormationOnaping Formation

IDYKNeck

Black Member ITUF ILTF ILST

ITBX/HTBXTransitional black to neck

Grey MemberITUFILTFILST

ITBX/HTBX Transitional grey to neck

H-heterolithic I-intermediate DYK-dyke LST-lapillistone LTF-lapilli tuff TBX-tuff breccia TUF-tuff

GEOLOGY

Regional Geology(Precis of description found in Falconbridge Field Guide edited by P. Snajdr)

The Sudbury Basin is situated close to the intersection of the Grenville, Southern and Superior Structural Provinces. It consists of:

1. Sudbury Breccia in the Archean basement and Proterozoic cover peripheral to the Sudbury Igneous Complex.

2. Sudbury Igneous Complex, a noritic and granophyric body lining the base of the Basin. The Ni-Cu-PGE sulphide ore deposits are hosted by offset dykes of quartz diorite and a distinctive phase of the SIC known as Sublayer

3. The Whitewater Group, consisting of the Chelmsford, Onwatin and Onaping Formations, which fills the Basin

The Structure is roughly oval in shape and is about 190 kilometers in diameter. It has been dated at 1850 Ma and was produced by a catastrophic event, either a meteor impact or volcanic cauldera collapse.

The Onaping Formation, the lowermost formation of the Whitewater Group,consists primarily of fragmental adesite volcanic rocks and is approximately 53 km long, 17km wide and 1.7 km thick. The upper, granophyric member of the SIC intrudes the base of this formation, and the Moore Lake Claim Block straddles this contact. (Fig. 3)

Property Geology Unit Descriptions

Granophyre- well exposed ridges;large, smooth, rounded outcrops- light brown-pink weathered surface- medium to coarse grained quartz, plagioclase, amphibole and/or biotite, 4-/-potassium

feldspar- texturally and compositionally variable- suggestion of foliation in rocks close to contact with neck; quartz veins and gashes

parallel and perpendicular to foliation common Xenolithic Granophyre

- light to medium brown-pink weathered surface- up to 1096 light coloured, well rounded and well sorted lapilli and blocks averaging 5 cm

in diameter- medium grained quartz, plagioclase, biotite and/or amphibole- contact with granophyre gradational

8

Fal

conb

ridg

e L

imit

ed

Inco

Lim

ited

Z

n-C

u-P

b-A

g-A

u D

epos

it

Sudb

ury

Igne

ous

Com

plex

WH

ITE

WA

TE

R G

RO

UP

^ O

nwat

in/C

helm

sfor

d F

orm

atio

ns

v!;;!!i

Ona

ping

For

mat

ion

Ona

ping

Falc

onbr

idge

Sudb

ury

15

Km l

FALC

ONBR

IDGE

LIM

ITED

Fig

ure

3.

M

ap o

f th

e

Bas

in

Neck- smooth ridges- intruded by SIC but boundary gradational; contact with tuffs sharp but irregular;

distribution often related to faults and photo lineaments; present as continuous sheets and plugs at base of, and as discrete bodies within tuffs

- light to medium brown-grey weathered surface- fine to medium grained plagioclase, quartz, +/-potassium feldspar, amphibole, + I-

chlorite and mica- 10 96 to 80 96 subangular to subrounded quartzite or granitoid fragments averaging 5 cm

in diameter- distinct to diffuse fragment boundaries- large (m) bleached granitoid bodies ribboned with quartz associated with neck; abundant

large (m) quartz veins often present causing host rock to be silicified- generally massive unit but foliated adjacent to Onaping

Grey Member- both grey and black members mapped on the basis of size and percentage of fragments

using Fischer's classification for pyroclastic rocks- slabby outcrops; moderately to well foliated- light green-grey weathered surface, medium green-grey fresh surface- fine grained plagioclase,amphibole, biotite, chlorite, calcite, quartz eyes- identified as grey based on presence of chlorite- up to 809fc lapilli sized fragments averaging 0.5 cm in diameter- variety of fragment types: 1. angular altered andesite which can be difficult to distinguish

because they blend into the matrix 2.angular pink granitoid fragments 3.larger, rounded quartzite and granitoid fragments 4. angular buff coloured ash-sized clasts 5. chlorite blebs 6. mafic clasts with felsic reaction rims

- some fragments autobrecciated and fluidal

Black Member- more carbonaceous, clast-poor and sulphide-rich than grey- medium grey weathered surface;dark grey fresh surface; graphitic lustre close to contact

with grey and when strained- fine grained plagioclase, amphibole, biotite, calcite- pyrrhotite blebs, stringers and associated with clasts- up to 80 9fc lapilli sized fragments averaging 0.5 cm in diameter- variety of fragment types 1. angular altered andesite 2. larger rounded quartzite and

granitoid fragments 3. angular buff-coloured ash-sized fragments- outcrops with up to 60 Jo fragment type 3. observed- one outcrop with a suggestion of bedding was observed- uncertainty as to whether black or grey designation is appropriate usually occurs in an

area of strain where black is schistose and not as dark as usual-possibly due to silicification- and clorite may be present

10

Transitional tuff to neck- a wishy-washy term incorporating impure examples of both units- similar to neck in that large (averaging 5cm) rounded quartzite and granitoid fragments

are present but generally less abundantly than in proper neck (up to 1096); few smaller and possibly much larger (m) fragments in evidencesimilar to tuff in that matrix is fine grained and foliated; chlorite may be a constituent mineral.

li

Plate 1. Rimmed block in ILTFb(abundant ash-fragment unit)

Plate 2. Interfingering of neck and ITUFb(abundant ash unit)

12

Structural Geology

There is little on the outcrop or map scale to suggest that appreciable folding has occurred. A fault surface with slickensides (possibly displaced?) and a small scale shear (062/82) are suggestive of ductile and brittle deformation respectively. Other suggestions of disruption include: flowage features and fluidal fragments, rolled and pulverized clasts, heavy weathering, schistose texture, crenulation cleavage and abundant quartz veining and calcite. A photo lineament cutting across the western-central portion of the block could be a fault causing displacement of the grey member northwards; alternatively, the ITUFb?g? could be silicified black member caused by a fracture, and the ILTFb unit may extend continuously across the property.

A strong, consistent foliation (061/55) and more variable but still pronounced lineation (140- 180/55) pervade the rocks; these features are well developed in the Onaping and weak to non existent in the granophyre. All rock units are conformable with, and their contacts parallel to, this foliation. Jointing is common in the granophyre and quartz veins and gashes are found in both the granophyre and neck.

Alteration

Calcite is found in some of the rocks, as blebs and associated with quartz-feldspar clasts. Silicification and sericitization are evident in the neck plugs. The grey member has a frosty, translucent texture which may be due to weathering of the feldspars in the vicinity of contacts with adjacent units.

Mineralization

Mineralization is scattered throughout the northwestern portion of the claim block, mainly in the ITUFb and ITUFb/g units, as is the case at Emma Lake. Anomalies are metal values of 100 ppm or greater; the richest assay is 480 ppm zinc found on the boundary between the black and the grey members in the vicinity of a possible fault. The primary ore mineral is pyrrhotite, with traces of pyrite and galena in places; the abundant zinc anomalies imply the presence of sphalerite. Mineralization occurs as disseminations, stringers parallel to the foliation, discrete blebs and associated with quartz-feldspar-calcite clasts.

13 ^J uLLuaAT

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Compton,R.R., Geology in the Field. J. Wiley A Sons, New York, 1985.

Gibbins, S. et al.,1988 Summary:Sandcherry7Vermilion Property, Falconbridge Ltd. Ex.

Gibbins, S. and Lori Nunes, 1989 Summary:Sandcherry/Vermilion Property, Falconbridge Ltd. Ex.

Hinse, G., Consultant's Report-Emma Lake, 1981.

Ranger, A., Summary of Data on Prospects-Falconbridge Nickel Mines Ltd., 1943.

Tims, A., Assessment Report-Emma and Moore Lakes, Falconbridge Ltd. Ex., 1989.

Field Guide:Sudbury Area Geology, Falconbridge Ltd. Ex., ed. P Snajdr, 1991.

Ontario Bureau of Mines, Vols H.ffl A IV, 1892-94.

Ontario Department of Mines, Vol 38,1929.

Ontario Geological Survey, GDIF 62, Creighton Township.

Maps:Airborne Geophysics 1:20000, Aerodat Ltd., Falconbridge Compilation.Ground Geophysics 1:5000, Emma Lake and Moore Lake grids, Val D'Or Geophysics, 1991,preliminary maps.

14

APPENDIX

APPENDIX lFinancial Statement

APPENDIX 2Geochemical and Whole Rock Analyses Summary, Certificates and Cheque Copies

APPENDIX 3Statement of Qualifications

MOORE LAKE STATEMENT OF EXPENSES

Geology Expenses

Salaries Field Supplies Equipment Rental Supply transport Analyses Food Si Lodging Mob Si demob

Ground geophysics Lincutting

:i.'jiftijiiiii|:^

S4,502.00 S4,707.00

July

Sl,720.00 SSO.OO

S50.00 S26.00

S385.00 S200.00

August

Si, 145.00

Sl,667.00 S119.00 S75.00

i|||i^^Q|:| l;!::^:^!^:^;^

Swastika Laboratories zA Division of Assayers Corporation Ltd.

Established 1928 Assaying - Consulting - Representation

Geochemical Analysis Certificate 1W-3625-RG1Company: FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED (SUDBURY) Date: AUG-09-91 Project: 264 Copy 1. 1977 McKENZIERD.,GENERAL DEUVERY,RR#2 Attn: D. ROGERS/J. STEWART 2. CHELMSFORD, ONT. POM 1LO

3. FAX TO 855-0333We hereby certify the following Geochemical Analysis of 8 ROCK samples submitted AUG-07-91 by .

Sample Number

M SA33989 |vy\SA33908

SA33923 SA33927 SA33959SA33960 SA33961 SA33970

Au ppb14 *3 10 10 C5

10 ^ ^

Cu ppm97 64 101 62 71115 93 76

Znppm6574 121 147 3729 13 45

Pb ppm25 5

76 1 111 1

Ag ppm0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1

Ni ppm63 6475 72 6776 6372

Certified by

P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK1TO Telephone (705)642-3244 FAX (705)642-3300

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION Of BUHGENER TECHNICAL ENTtHPHPSES I.IMITFO

1301 FEWSItH DRIVE

mamr

SAMPLE

SAMPLE

S,R S,MS-MS.' S.

- S-t s

St; e

i S

: s- Q

K- sjs! S

- sssss

CO

Au

Wuw^

) FROM

) OF

V339!339

*339^339,t339

k339JL339:U339!

13391V339.U339.13391339

L339L339L339i339.339

PY:V01C

36*8*9*o&1

32)3141516

li9839

j;42f3144546

Vi:Cf 20/91

For enquiries on this *v\ Samples, Pulps and Reje

^ r

Fa19R.;"YiPOI

Pu

J. PR(

)rt, ts f

@(4lBXi

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

oonbridge Limited (Sudbury)7 MCKenzie Rd., General Delivery. #2

ivnaoiacwAuvjrt, I.JIN i /\n \ \.t L4W 1A2

^5-1514 FAX: (416)e2H(J3na

REPORT NO.

M95021ms ford, Ontario L J

1LOINVOI

p P.O.

Stewart /D. Rogers JECT: 264

S Ag Moppm ppm ppm

^AQD < 10 *clO^10^ <lo <^o

300 x:10 <10300 <10 <10300 ^0 <10

200 <10 UO300 <10 <10200 UO <10200 <10 <10200 ^0 <10

900 <10 *:10400 <10 <10300 UO <10200 <10 <10300 -clO <10

400 <10 <10200 <10 <10200 UO <10400 <10 <10200 *clO <10

r"^s.

V )SIGNED v/

please contact Customer Service Department. s S" i (carded two months from the date of this report.

:CE #:

31 Moor:

o)/, q *,:, . 2.70)

•2.7. ~2. 3

'- ^^ '~i

,j?^, ft) Page 1 of 2

1

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION

^^H

SAMPLEI

SAMPLE!

;SJ:Si- Si:sj s;

' SJ

: s;' SJ

s; s;

- s;•Si'. SIM

COINl

Au(

For entiui Samples, F

S) FROM

3) OF

33947 33948 33949 33960 133851

i338!i2 0338 !i3 i338! i4

J338H7 ,338!i8 L338!i9

*Y:'OICE:

I 20/91

'ies on this re 'nips and Rej

1

Fa:19 1

R.I Clw POI

Pu:

J.PR(

ort. :tsd

r i (416) f.

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

conbridge Limited (Sudbury) 7 McKenzie Rd., General Delivery . #2 Imsford, Ontario

1LO INVO:

p P.O.

Stewart /D. Rogers JBCT: 264

S Ag Mo ppm ppm ppm

200 *:1Q <10 200 <10 <10 200 x;10 <10 200 <10 <10 200 UO <10

200 <10 *:10 200 <10 <10 300 <10 <10 300 <10 <10 200 ^0 <10

200 <10 -c 10 900 ^10 <10 300 *:1Q <10

^.! SlttMFD y 1 ^

ilease contact Customer Service Dopartmtmt. ' (S^" scarded two months from the data of this report. ""

1301 FFWSTFR DRIVF MISSISSAUGA, ON 1 AH IO

L4W lA'-' 25-1S44 FAXM416) 625 8368

REPORT No.

M9502

CE #:

^ -^ fiT' Page 2 of 2

FALCONBRIDGt,

J.

STH

MR

S B

. B0

3EH

S

PRQ

J:26

4

SWASTIKA LABORATORIES

P.O. BOX LO- SW

PHOHE *:

1705

) -

642

- 32**

KA, OBTMUO

AX #

: (7

O5)

- 642

- 3300

3BH

PUC

f

1385

713

858

3859

I. C. A. P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lith

iua M*taBor*t* Fusion

KZPO

RT N

o.

: M

95

02

Pa

g*

No.

; l

of

l F

ile

Mo.

:

JW15

RA

Dct

* :

JH3Q

-15-

1991

Gui

des

In 3

-

Min

or*

ppa

CflO

: i":

Wff

QIr

^2^

49 1

0.S

&.-

iuS

i 3.

41::

4.1

9 2.

16S"

2vO

6 0.

4ft:

;X*.

3*

0.14

,0-0

1561

vT;

11.4

6|

9.46

3

.63g

; 4.

41

2.4

K

2V32

O

.3t4

tt.3

1

0.12

0,O

2O?*

4;.6

7 13

.67?

: *.o

l 2.

83^:

2.4

9T

atT

T'

" '

3.60

W2.

21

3.S*

:;;.2

:;89

O.SS

rjtr

.l4.

07^3

:^36

l

.Vfg

tiK

ii

4.iog

va;se

o.*

^itiz

* i2

.iops

i;9^

o-**;

iv?0

.14

^^0

05

:69i

7B

12.0

9?:

6.O

*l.

lftS

*-1

6

1.48

?; 0

.51

3.6f

r;:;t:

3v5O

4.445

^-2^6

60

.80

0.0

8o.

oe0,0

7

o.ift

;.o.o

o5:

13.2

5tv

7^

13.

1.86

S 1.9

1

3.B

3J

2.9B

0.

94J;

O

-4

.IS

3

.9i

7.32

:";

0.4

6

0.6

7^

0;

4.O

S/

3.9

2

7.0

3^

:0;7

i 0.

60y

0.2

6 O

.OO

S 0.1

2

0.14

] 0

.02

0

.0.1

6 0.

14:0

^02

0;

10.4

6^:2

166

0.2J

I O

V90

1.99

-V 1

.29

69.5

4 1

2.39

5 69

. WJ

12-7

91;

6.4

66

.70

^7^

7?

12.4

0^:5

.84

70iv

44

12-7

1j;-

Si2

8:|^

52 i

2.50

^:::6

xss

: 64

:11

IS.a

feB

iio"

77.7

2 10

.5?:

2.6

270

.97

11.7

4 5.6

082.3

0

8.78

- 2

.17

i.oi:-

:-1.

56.

0.80

1.32

1.75

1.

2*:

-2-7T

CT

0.19

0.49

tt.

62

0.16

1.2

2o.

ea

-1.16

5

o:69

0.7

3-1

.18

--ZT: 1.12

1.29

1.75

0.8

9

3.3

0

3-86

:.4-

03;;-

3.61

V

3.69

-

O. 7

5/O

; 14

0.20

;:0;O

05

2.5

*

3.7

2

3.0

4

3.6

*:

3.9

43.7

5r

3:6

84.0

8:

ZiM

o.77

5:;o

.oa

O.8

6 ::-

O. 0

9 0.

83t:

b-0

?

0.8

4s

Of .0

6

0.20

&Q

.OO

5 0.

2ff:

0.:O

O5o.

ia o

.oos

o. is

: 0/0

650.

16tO

i005

3.7

8:

2.63

4.01

2 - 2

7

2T81

cr~0

.87:

0.

1L

i:.B

6 0.

26V

0.

03o.o

fr oi'

oio3:

32

0.32

0.

04

0.0

80.0

10

3.2O

0.

73

OH

O

0.12

;:0.

005

2.9

6

0.20

O

.03

0.0

40,0

10

90

198i

.;;\

2Q

-f.,.-

^..,.

log

iso^

jaa

i;|j!

^^

co*S

?5?

ff^^

* ^-

-.-:-L

- -L-

---:

S:-:

^-:-"

:r-.-:

---

-.-.

,-,-

^-

---

----

--

—--

-r.'

284^

744^

;

O.O

eiO

vOlO

75

2;

220

102

:] *6

:/ 54

; 86

828p

9*b:

156

;;i92

2043

;

264

-

"a*

; 22

: 12 24 30 28 ;i4

722

87 8

:: 58

8"

134

llfi

: 9

4

102V

216 80

8 14 6

35-::

-: 5O

25

r/"

20B

O/

-. 5

65

< 10

20-.

. 15

20

:V:'--

20

15:

0.7

4 9

9.9f

r 10

: 0.6

3 9

9.48

:lo:

":. 0.

901 o

o.69

/:

SIG

NE

S

:^ \

/^

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION Qf pCMNItAL ENTERPRISES LIMIlCD

1301 PEWSTER DRIVE MISSISSAUOA, ONTARIO

L4W 1A7

r^-r j1 i

! ii :

SAMPLE^) FROM j

iSAMPLE! 5) OF |

P

1 vzf S T i \j t \

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

falconbridge Limited (Sudbury) 19' 7 McKenzle Rd., General Delivery *.!t. #2 IlhMmsford, Ontario POM 1LO

INVO: Pulp P.O. s

l '. ' ~

J. j Stewart /D. Rogers iPRQJECT : 264

i

s Ag ppm ppm

SA33951 SA33952 s; .339 53 8^3395.4 S7.33955

S/,33956 S/ 33957 S/ 33958 St 33962 St 33963

St 33 9 64 SP 33965 St 33966 S* 33967 S/ 339 68

S* 33969 SJ 33971 St 33972 St 33973 SA33974

COPY: INVOICE:

Aug 20/91

For enquiries on this rep Samples, Pulps and Rejoi

300 UO 200 <10

1900 4 10 12000 <10

200 <10

200 UO 12200 <10 12300 UO 2600 ^0

i 600 <10'1300 <10

: 200 *:10 1 200 <^o

500 UQ J1000 <10

1000 ^0 , 700 <10

800 UO i 600 <10 ! 600 ^0

i

REPORT No.

M9501

CE #:

6 Mocve' , ', 7- " ~~ i ~ "- '~~ : ' •j. x— ~

i 9:: Oo

Mo ppm

^0 <10 <10 10

<10

<10 <10

10 10

<10

ao<10 <10 <10 <10

*:10 <10 <10 <10 <10

^SIGNED V/J

ii

l

V* C T *i*\ -, rrry ,JT^ W

urt, Rloasa contact Customer Service Department. ' e-"^!^? ^^ :ts discarded two months from the date of this report. "{"Page 1 of 2.^-—— ________________________________________ i ————————————————————————

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESO l VISION Or UUHtiSMtR TECHNICAL FNTEHPRISCS L l lvl 11 CD

1301 FEWSTCF1 DRIVE MISSISSAUGA, ONTAR |()

L4W 1A2 (416) ( 25-1544 FAX; (41(1) G2G-83B8r M "i

i i

SAMPLE^) FROM :

1 1

SAMPLES) OF j

3 :

i

Sf 33975 SA 33976 SA 33977 SA33978

M SA 33979

- SA33980 SA 33981 SA33982 SA33983 SA33984

SA33985 ..SA33986M i

COPSf: INVOICE:

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

a] conbridge Limited ( Sudbury ) 9' 7 McKenzie Rd., General Delivery ..I!. #2 ht lots ford, Ontario ^ 1LO

INVQ] 'ul|P P.O. \

f. Stewart /D. Rogers 'RQJECT: 264

S Ag ppm ppm

300 UO : 200 <10

200 <10 200 <10

2900 UO

1 700 UO 1900 UQ 400 UQ 700 UO 300 UO

i 200 UQ 1 200 UO

Aug 20/91

1

MOppm

UO UO UO UO

UO UO UO UO UO

UO UO

( -x

SIGNED S/

For enquires on this repbrt, please contact Customer Service Dopartrrmrtt. j Samples, Pijilps and Rojctjts dijscarded two months from thy date of this report,

j

REPORT No.

M9501

CE #:

i

i

1 R s r^r[vfPage 2 of 2

FALC

ON

BR

IDG

Ej.

am

gan

t D.

ROGE

RSPR

OJ:

264

m-3624-Ml

SAMPLE f

5*33951

SA33952

3*33953

SA3393*

8A3395S

3A33

956

a*33

9S7

5*33

958

3JU

3962

3*

3396

3 R

3X33

964

SH33

965

SA33

966

SJL

3396

7 SA

3396

8

3*33

969

SA33

971

3A33

972

S&33

973

R

3H33

974

SA33

97S

SSJ3

976

SA33

977

SA33

978

R

SX33

979

M

SA33

9S5

SA33

9B6

M

TSL/91

SWA

STIK

A

T^B

OR

AT

OR

IES

P.O.

BOX

10.

.U

TIK&

, ca

mai

DPHONE #:

[705

) -

642 -

3244

FAX #1

[705}

- 64

2 -

3300

I.C.A,P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lithium HetaBeratc Fusion

REPO

RT M

o.

: M

95.

^Pa

ge

Ho.

:

L of

l

FI l*

Ho.

:

JUJ1

5KB

taee

:

KU

O-1

9-19

9I

-Oil

d**

in X

-

Min

or*

ppa

3IGNED

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION Of BUHUENCH LN rt rifH IHtJi LIMIILU

'^"'"^•^••Sl^^^^—— . ' 1301 FCWSTER DRIVE^^•^^^H^^^^^^r MISSISSAUGA, ONPAHIORlflE^Hr ir*^^~

SAMPLER

SAMPLE!!

H StSIStBlS)

SIeiS)SISJ

SJSJSJSJSJ

SJSJSJSJSJ

CO]IMAu

For enquir Samples, Pi

FROM .

,

OF

339 S339CJ39S339?339*

339*339*339!339f339!

339*339)340C339(i339(

k339(L339Ii339*1339113391

78:oil'2

'3'41516\7

1819101

J2

34

156

\7

*Y:rDICEt

j 20/91

3S on this rep ilps and;RejO'

^r\

?aiL97l. E;he?OW

Pul

J.PRC

3 rt, tsd

©(416)6;

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

csonbrldge Limited (Sudbury)7 McKenzie Rd., General Delivery

#2line ford, Ontario

1LOINVOI

p P.O.:

Stewart /D. RogersJECT: 264

S Ag Moppm ppm ppm

200 <10 <10400 4:10 <10

1600 <10 103800 UO 10

400 <10 <10

200 <10 <103000 -ao <lo1500 ^10 *ao1100 <10 <10300 -ao <10500 <10 <10

2800 UO <102400 <10 UO

400 <10 <10700 -clO <10

4300J <10 <103TOO <10 <10300 <10 4:10500 <10 <10500 UQ <10

^filGNPD V ^

lease contact Customer Service Department, jy ^-*-~^ icardsd two months from tha date of thi3 raport. f — ~" ——

L4W 1A^51544 FAX: (416)6258368

REPORT No.

M9503

CE #:

3O Moares — /\ ^ ( t \_JVAT x

0 '' "5 ^"- ' ,. ' ' ' ' - " " ' ~ '-'-' /- - i- ' ' -'

7iZ/.;-

ii

p —— --N r^

.^5- V.,Page 1 of 2

j

TECHNICAL SERVICE LABORATORIESDIVISION Of BUHGtMCfl TLCHNICAL LNTtPI

130! rtIWSItK UKIVfc

F

SAMPLEf

SAMPLER

s;S/s/st st

- Sis>

! s/- Sf

M s;

s/ siSIst s;

s;

COINI

AU4

For enquir Sample-;, P

mFJ

i) FROM

1 OF

33909 33910 33911 33912 33913

339 .339i339: .339 .339

.3391

.3392

.339:

.339J

iJoV j

14 5 67 8

9.031 ,2

fcs

Y: 'OIC*:

1 20/91

(es on this re ilps and' Heje

m

ai 97 l. F

?ON

f*ul

J. PRC

ort, its d

r igjj (416)62

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

conbridge Limited (sudbury) i 7 McKenzie Rd., General Delivery . #2 Imsford, Ontario

1LO INV01

p P.O.:

Stewart/D. Rogers JECT: 264

S Ag Mo ppm ppm ppm

400 <10 -;10 7400 <10 <10 1000 <10 <10

800 <10 K 10 500 -*:10 <10

300 <10 <10 900 <10 <10

1400 *clO <10 1800 <10 <10

300 <10 <10

300 *:10 ^0 300 <10 <10 200 <10 <10 600 <10 <10 400 *c!0 <10

400 <10 <10

* ) V^

SIGNED V X S* V s

Hease contact Customer Service Department, s t^L^scarded two months from the data of this report.

L4W 1A7 51544 FAX: (416)6258368

REPORT No.

M9503

CE #:

CTA

"'Page 2 of 2

FALCONBRIDGE

J.

3TE

UU

T i

D.

ROG

ERS

PB

OJ:

264

IB-3

622-

acl

PHOB

E

SWA

STIK

A

LAB

OR

ATO

RIE

SP.O. BOX 10.

SV

IXA. ONTARIO

(70S)

- 642 -

3244

FWt S

: [70S) -

642 -

3300

SWtP

LE #

M '?

W02

A12

03iW

203

63v9

5 13

.52:

5.

6263.4

7

13.3

7j'y

7.71

'SST

Xj'

iz.ij

;'10

".3

alif

tlxW

lt.

94

lp.2

1

"3-4

8 9

.40

^-

79

:*V8

5

3.7

4:

4.3

0

3.J9

4.4

9nr

r44i-

.4.

52-v

-!aC

;74

8,97

; ::

*2;1

6 12

.57-

:; 6

1.22

12

.55:

-60.8

7

12.1

2:13

,27?

; 6.

59

0.11

4.86

4.00

; 5.

Ci"

3.66

62.4

3

12.5

2;

9.4

6

3.16

V 4

.14

:^B

2,73

: Il

-S5f

;;v-

Bv7

6 4.

ZZ

^ J

.9i

61.9

4 12

.36S

;i9-

05

3.52

^ 4.

B4

"61

.17

12

.44^9.8

4

4.89

1 4.

38

61.O

S 12

.16;

;: 9.

7061.2

* 1

1.99

K 9

.1*

64.1

6 13

.15^

7,

09: 6

3.57

13.

Oi;:

:-. 6

; 18

"63

.23

13.1

0?;7

;5B

72

.76

11.

9*;

--4.

BO

;*2.

i? 1

1. at;

'; 9, a

a;ci

i.l^

13.3

7:;:

9;23

?:6t

.50

13

.05

^-7

.98

56

3:3*

13.

29;;

7:2

3

yU

i2* 1

3.2

t--7

.65

-*3;

3S 1

2.8

4

B. 2

261.9

1

13.4

ft:

S-'

*;:63-2

i li.s

*--

"K".

5TS~

~

4.8

7

4.0

7

4.58

:;

4.3

7

3.8

7^

:3.7

1

4.33

:: S

v86

3.1

3;

3.65

i.Oft;

-': i;6

8

3.66

:":

i.05

3.

94i;

J:3.

89i

4.4

2

3.9O

4.0

63

.50

3.9

3

3.8

33.8

63.9

8i.

73

71.6

01

12.3

Z

5.05

0.

84

2.12

.63.

02 1

1.05

-' 10

.61

1-33

4.

1361

.92

11.5

7; 1

0.01

6.

62

3.99

63.2

4 10

.37

9.69

4.

28

5.29

59.7

4 11

. 80;

: 10.

47

4.46

. 3.

9761.2

710.5

^.9

.44

3.67

3.

92

X20

t :"

*;

::

~6T

67

: 1-

O4~

5

.69

0

.74

I. C. A. P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lit

hium

Met

&B

orat

e F

usio

n

P20S

:'Cr2

03

ns7i

8toT

S25—

tt&^-

iSS~

~2To

T0.1&0.025

36O:

v;:136

214;

~0.1

4c- u.

625.

r tt-

REPO

RT No

. : H950L

Page

Ho.

: l of

2

Fil* H

o.

: AU15RA

Date

:

AUC-15-1991

Oild

ai in

k

- Mi

nors

ppx

"o76

i7~bT

i'2r

0.6

0i:

0

,17

v.i^

.-;

u.^

94.

40

2.S

I; ;-

z, 1

2 O

.SL

r;0

.1*

^0.2

.0

1^33

3.8

6

3-72

4.5

8

4-32

3-3

11.

S8

: 2.3

0

4.3

4;

2-

3.2

8"

l.f

rZ

3. Si

:-": 1

.74

4.6

7X

1.7

6

4.3

3^

2.1

0

3.S

2S 1

.56

3.5

9^2

.42

5.44

*;;!.

10

4.7

7:

1.6

4

4.3

6

1.9

23.

78:^

:2.2

4~T

:XW: :;

2:o*

4.4

4

2.02

0.2

80.5

20

.53

.0,5

2

O. 5

7:.;

0.53

::

0.49

ii 0

.53

;O

.SS

f;

o. si

: o,

so::

0.57

; 0,

58

0.56

0.4

3,

o.si;

0.5

90

.56

0.5

8

0.2

7

.P-2

40

.36

:0:'

1*

0.21

: 0.

27:

0.26

0.26

0.27

0.09 b.itf

0.2

0

0.06

0^

26

o:;i*

0.0

9

0.5

8 .

0,1

2

0.60

. TJ

757

(KIT

0.1

7O

. 4*

Oi0

6

1.94

2.

09

1.84

2.

49

2.O

B:

2.30

1.28

1.3

81.

401.

90

0.53

0.4

90.

450.

52.

0,4

8

0.3

40.

37

0.38

0.

43

Q.3

4

0.14

:- Q

i 02Q

O

.l4:;

fl^

q20

0.12

"O.O

25

0.1

4-0

.020

0.14

: XI;

020

0.1

4 O

.025

0.

12=

0.02

00.

12;

O.0

15

0.12

O.Q

20

0.14

. 6.0

20

0.1

2

0.01

5 0.

14

0.01

5 0.

16;

0.02

O

0.1

6 0

,020

0.1

0 0

.020

0.1

2

0.02

0 0.

14:

0.0

20

O.1

6 0

.020

0.

14:

0.0

20

0.14

^0.

020

0.16

;"or

62O

0.16

:;: O

, 025

-07T

4^rO

f.^20

0.10

Q.0

2O

0.14

0.

020

752

0.14

0.

020

496

0.12

/0.0

20

636

0.16

V0.

020

1048

0.16

0.0

15

702

99.1

120

": 1.

9310

0.40

70

20

': 2.

4^ 9

9.52

; 20

Ip

.' 2^

22 9

7.66

:^2o

;:.::5:

.:45

99.2

5:

5IC.

NEO

:

FALC

ON

BR

Ii. -

fiJ.

ST

BU

MT

4 O

. RO

GER

S

PKO

J:26

4

IW-3

622-

RC

1

SWA

STIK

A

LA

BO

RA

TO

RIE

SP

.O.

SO*

10.

BT

IKA

, O

BT

MIO

PHO

KE

#;

(70S

) -

642

- 32

44

PAX

*:

(709

) -

642

- 33

00

I. C. A. P.

WHOLE ROCK ANALYSIS

Lith

ium Mtt

aBor

aee

Fusion

S1

MP

U f

S;

SP ~

-:

-61'

i.K ll

.7ff

S-9

.73

2.;

, .

-: —

:~-'

V

..

*i^;

::::

i:

* .v"

v*

2.36

;;:

27

^-:-:

-c---;

::-"-

?rK

K^

REPO

RT

No.

:

H95

' P*

g*

do,

: 2

of

2 F

ile

No.

:

AULS

Rfc

Dat

a :

AU

O-l

S-m

i O

vid*

* In

X -

Min

or*

ppo

-70

"

•c^:

":.--

-':':'

.

SIG

HED

:

:fe^:i-v

;:

99.

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, Jill K. Stewart, of Toronto, Ontario hereby certify that:

1. I graduated from Queen's University with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Geological Sciences in 1986.

2. I am a geologist employed on contract by Falconbridge Limited (Exploration), 1977 McKenzie Road (General Delivery, RR#2) Chelmsford, Ontario POM 1LO.

3.1 have been practising my profession for five years and have been actively involved in geological work for six years.

4. I have no financial interest in these claims or Falconbridge Ltd.

5. I conducted this geological survey.

Dated at C. L bs AT J this 22 hcf day of A^.J . 1991^ ~

wwfa^

6351 i 6348 - --j---f-- ,

S. (g)| S. (P6350|6347

S. (2 634516346

93/11 '59343

55038155037

50Afcfe50^1

'28269^8268126262BIT [593728270(28264

59409 59AO

W02 59304159^60 44651446^15058|55057

5509115506

41H1SEM2e 2.14362 CREIGHTON

Ontario300

Ministere du DeVeloppement du Nord et des Mines

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

February 24, 1992

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines159 Cedar Street2nd FloorSUDBURY, OntarioP3E 6A5

Dear Sir:

SUBJECT:

Mining Lands Branch Geoscience Approvals Section 159 Cedar Street, 4th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5

Toll Free: Telephone: Fax:

Our File: Your File:

1-800-465-3880 (705) 670-7264 (705) 670-7262

2. 14382W. 9170. 50014W. 9170. 50015

APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK SUBMITTED ON MINING CLAIMS S. 995748 ET AL, IN CREIGHTON TOWNSHIP.

The assessment work credits for the Geophysical and Geological Surveys, under sections 14 and 12 respectively, of the Mining Act Regulations, submitted on the above work report have been approved as of February 11, 1992.

Please indicate this approval on your records.

Yours sincerely,

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands BranchMines and Minerals Division

DT/jl Enclosures:

CC: As g tag g mont* Pi T og Off-i

Toronto, OntarioResident Geologist Sudbury, Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand' *s

'ntano

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Number

jrsonal Information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This Information will be used for correspondence. Questions about is collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street, jdbury, Ontario. P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264. ^ 1 /l O O Tt

A * l 4 o b dtstructlons: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.

- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining Recorder.

- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form In duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.

Recorded Holders)

r dlcor-iriMacjeAddress J

PG Re* 4O L,nd*Mining Division

SudburyDates ' Worts From: l i Performed x iJly

_ irrii '

fry 1

74

1 AnntX FalrorJTownshlp/Area

1 r^mi

,LJr POM /.SO

t l

Client No.

Tetep'twheNo/'" '

6132761M or Q Plan No.

M 73fii^ — - —— ' ——— J TO: AW i w \

Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)Work Group

Geotechnical Survey

Physical Work, Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

dfeolodical sur-vey rj*oprySloa( Auwtyr ( mad HLEM 1

J J J J

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs

Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name

Jill \5-rtwarr C r-alconLr-idde. J

M^ltS-T^^Te

AddressAp4 1 ^8 AlnoroD'*

5O bc*jl. Larw*C|0*

Val d 'Or Quebec

M

-^(b R 7S&

^ 2.H6

4Kb 534 47^Q

ftl^f R75 ftSZCj

(attach a schedule If necessary)

Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side

1 certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial Interest by the current recorded holder.

Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

J III i/MJLuuaJ^T

Certification of Work Report1 certify that 1 have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed Its completion and annexed report is true.

Name and Address of Person Certifying

i l STC^C"!" 1 -Telepon^No!

416-334- 4790

too /^Inamkra A\ve,Date

/U 7 1.&U

oroj-,/0 On-/ M6R ?5Certified By (Signature)

same during and/or after

*6

For Office Use Only_______.,Total Value Cr. Recorded Date Recorded L

Deemed Approval Date

Date Nodce for Anandmenls Sent

Date Approved

Received Stamp

1C

05

CnJO J201

Q

l/)

-Q.a

X)-Q.

(y)-Q Ji

g

J)

-Q J}01

OD-J

0)-D JJ

OD

0)JQ -QCn

DD0^

/)

5

b)

j)-Q Ji01

S

HIiile

CO f2 Sai53 1

I

ri

ir

i

C*)SJ

30W0

si

8

CD

p -j

8

JO

O

01

-KCo

a

O

01

0 0

OD

8

O0

CD

B01

o0

CD

pn

K

g

CD

0

pi

-^

b

Sil*"8 W

Ills

I

JX3s*

-B^j01

Wo^JJl

0i

01

OJo-4

~-

GJ O,-JOi

K\J

**^jj

01

-dj

Oi

Co O^01

l 3 I s

tt

tillBB?

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:

1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.

2. ^3 Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.

3. D Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.

Note 1: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed An patented or tenad land, please complete the following:

that the recorded holder 'h** * ttenenool! \Mmtt fa tt* p*M*d or S*?.secS iantf a' the time the worft **as i^iwlftiwMit.

tan st Date

P-* fi A ?i,^ f- A*

oi

Northern Development and Mines

Ontario.

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Number

Personal ir :ation collected on this form is obtained under (he authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Fourth Floor. 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario. P3E 6A5, telephone (705) 670-7264.

1 A.* JL -t

O/.r-

.. .-- . .- —— - -,,-- - r - ~ -.- . -.-..... . * - O V--'

- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for requirements of filing assessment work or consult the Mining Recorder.

- A separate copy of this form must be completed for each Work Group.- Technical reports and maps must accompany this form In duplicate.- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned to, must accompany this form.

/LRecorded Holders)

Address

P*"1 r^Ox 4'^ L- r-,Mining Division

Dates Work From: . , Performed f";

;; i i (3\\

.-jt]~\ li /\r.r--* ha/f-r-.kr'JqiTownship/Area ]

,. y :i : q^;

- POM /SO1

^ rkj

Client No.

Telephone No.

6*13 Z7tM or Q Plan No.

M 7^

To: 1 ? a /ac*/- f unc* ^.o i l " '

Vi

J

c

Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)Work Group

. i Geotechnical Survey

Physical Work. Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

d- -\ji- ' ^.•vj "i'-.Nr.r '.(- si -...rv*-/ ( n-irtcf HLCN'I t

i ' ' 7 i

-

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs .OQ

Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name an c Address of Author of Report)Name

Q^j^irrf 1 ou^vry

.--|JI O^.^idrf ! h i! --r- cVtl] D Or Oc^^/^ "*^ r

v^y k * . j ; I j (^ rx^ Q b* F i l \jT ~ ^~ T i ^,

^r - N ^P" J

•J

Address

A , S d A l L L A p y 1 ' \O^5 /^A J rioT^kro A*^C.

T^rw^Vft Or^^r.O M6P 2S(^

Val D'Or Quet^r |9P 7Hfev.y

4/6 534 4 70! H

fi 19 ^25^52^

(attach a schedule H necessary)

Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side

1 certify that at the time th* work WAS performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial Interest by the current recorded holder.

Date

Aui 2 LI W

Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

CLuM**!Certification of Work Report

1 certify that 1 have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report is true.

Name and Address of Perscr Getr",-- *g

i l 1 t^-J , . ''-Z h II Oir'sir ' "-SJ

Teltfpone No.

4/6 ^4 4-7* -1For Office Use Only

A j ! t A "J j /l f o r) r^f^fd t\^^ y c/'O/^ j o

Date

^ Q 7 /Q"? '

^V ^1 ,^vTotal Value Cr. ReconMC Data Recorded

Oec**v\Dfr i.lHnl-. 3*ened Approval Date

Cti Oi \0^-) f (Circls. \ 3. 1^1*15-

Mining Re^oy

On/ M6R 2S&Certmed By (Signature)

II II /\-f~ -l l jJJ tA^jlLuJCtAT

l*rj

Date Approved - '

Daee Notic* (or Amendments Sent

Received Stamp

~ , \0241

\i

j)

vi

JlCn

Ji

(JlJj

s) 05 K

Co -O.a en-Q N

-Q

Ul -O

O

-Q 01 -Q

LoJ2Jl (Jl-fl CD

-Q-a

-O

Co-Q

en-Q

c?-

CO -D -Q.LP-Q

Ln

-O -Q(ji -a

5 2

s bU}

K\

J)

-Q -0

Jl

5s

,o

-Q

S

J

Ul

ji

fi-Q -Q Jl

A

J)

-O X! Jl

Lfl

X)JJ ^

Jl

J)

X! -0

vi

i

p -fl-0Jlvi

AM

JJJD-QLnvi-^.OJ

LP

.U

.a Lnvi

3D

zS3)^ c 0

liif9 3

cQ o | ll a |

lir

irIr

s80O

Jl

oo

2-G.V/

8'

N 0CD 43'-J

l*

ho o03ji -j

B

oOD Ji

1

MD3D ^i

8

s0)

J-

O30

Jv

8

si

S-Q.

8

D CD J3

8

D

-Qvj~-w.

3

k)s-C

vj

8

jivj

^^^o o

KJ oDD J2-v|

-k

8

*O-Q

8

N O 33 -Q

-J

*8

ODO-Q-J

O0

N)0 D-avj

SJOCD -Qvj

^

8

MO03

-J

.K

8

Ni o"T

vj

-t.

8

hoO

4^'

M

*T

-J

8

M

J..ivi

0 0

\)sJlvj

Ao oDo

Value of Assessment Work Done on this Claim

- S^a?3'i-f g

li.O

Jl01Jjo

Jlvj

Q)-Q J2

*sj

CP -Q-vi * .

J2OD-Q

C^ DD Do

JlOD-Q

DoJl

CDj)-4

Do-Q-4

3D-Q

CD-a CD

-aDO -Q

L

1S

^Jivj

3DJlvj

t

la :

* siJ)j} j

6* 3) -Q

vi~

3 ^5'jS <

l 3! 1

B

I||

S"

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:

1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.

2. D Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.

3. 0 Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.

Note 1: Examples of beneficial interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claim*.

Note 2: H work has been performed on patented or leased Jand, please complete the following:

l certrfy Ui* rte recorded hoWer hatJ m lor lej?',M la'-rt a* the lime th* rerk was pi -y ri

k - BALFOUR TWP.

, 4

^

6352 l 6549

6351 6348

633OI63478 "

6345(6346

5*34415641155322 56317

5504055039 28249)28248

S

28269 28268128262

28270(2826-4 28263'28267

S

505695052

6j?i S (K^^^^^ t rt f* r* *r f*

S9A3SI5H

fi Y* f" r 7s2*80)28600 2878928/982879212879 28291)28289

28276, ^^- ^r /R\

28284)28262 88277)2827908(28*157 28459)28460

355613555

59460 '59461 28430(28458 28297)20898 282952829 28286(2826

54060 '54059

54062 1&061

64063154064

54068 540&7 5A066

THE TOWNSHIP OF.

CREIGHTONi DISTRICT * SUDBURY

i

SUDBURY MINING DIVISION

SCALE:- i INCH TO 40 CHAINS

CEQtND.r

PATENTED '-t AN OSCROWN LANG 9 ALEC LICENSE OF OCCUPATION LOCATED LANDS IMPROVED WOADS RAILWAYSPuWFR TRANSMISblON LINE:

NOTESAH k A fr A H l* t d r*vSt ve j -.i/-,

400* Surface Rights Reservation around all Lakec and Rivers. * -

*V', t *

.._ . .Areas withdrawn from staki

*r* nf -*n^HM^^^H^^^^^ jjl P 1

^^^^^^^^^l^r

W 99/71

* -* ft-- t ?f*WiiI J. if.

L.O 9122 issued for flooding rights for Stobie Dam (Lot l O Con.vDand londs flooded to contour elevation 81

DATE OF ISSUE

SUDBURY MINING RECORDER'S OFFICE 1

GRAHAM TWR

tnnsEaaae 2.14382 CREIGHTON 200

Z.fl&ZTHE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES, AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED. THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MIN ING CLAIMS SHOULD CON SULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER. MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOP MENT AND MINES, FOR AD

DITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON

M.738..•r

±--————ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES

5I53OOON 481870 E:

T ars l ILOT* l LOT3

i

r

viCoMCESSION V

r

' CONCESSION V

!—^CONCESSION (V

i

5l4*fOOoN 48I870E

5I53OOOKI ^95 8 TO

11SEM2* 2.14382 CREIGHTON 210

1-

SUDBURY BASINFALCONBRIDGE LIMITED

L-.

N

—i

EARLY PROTEROZOIClorieooa Complex

Gmpnyre.

Group

Onopina PomnoTion

B NeckCjii/ucf

i LsrJT6X/HT3X

nGrty. (q)

-^

i k or.- ft'}'i

ITUF

r— I LTF

— ILST

IronetTi

Dew*" neck

DVX - dyte TTjr ' Ju/T L.TF - loftill, tuff TBX

LST-1

ozo

rionroliorii

A loin r , frocrura /" '

Cis..ne.

Vtin

ozsJ' i dn*afion

i 7 liinde /i ne/

f axial p/ant

c/aim /in*-

cloirr. /'"e

CMlrr-i Do*/

P*/

O Anonnoloos Cu.Zn.N, f* !OO ppm

-l

-l

2-14382

-FALCONBRIDGE EXPLORATIONFALCO\BRIDGE, ONTARIO

LAKE. n/ocit

DRAWN DY

DATE

SCALE. 1:

IOO JOO Z.QO

LOTIO

-2L5l52OOONi 48ZIZOE

LOT q LOT6

~\

A

t ^" V VW*,

. - *T

l-.-'-*

W"\**-*"

- L^es?*^*Wfcju-i&X.1 :"; " ""

^•nr-

' - f ~.i *1 * * f

SUDBURY BASINN ,- J r ' , E . V " E C

N

**k^V\-v-^ V" .NKI'-l-ki'

^ \ f-** 1

if* AN"

^'..**

*x± .u

. 5' ^^A-fC* \.,-v '"J^ -^t^^ \^p^2—I^Vtgi^^^W

l- i'*^

7SS ivTf'j- :^,^

,^ ^,,^' rJ^-4*^

^vt

qqs-r^V K*\

'*~**\*** \^^f \ 'se Vi*, T -JiSr -W1^Vv^/^

-^ \^^u ' \"^Tv^A^t/.^

^^/igjr\^xV-^1

fV-"^*" x c,--1 ^^-^ i^\ jpt^'*"^

w- f* Ws^^\^ ^-^

-r'',cPT

v^S^-^*

*\^5^^

^*^^\ \i*?i. t -

1& W ^ \ i .s 1*1** V^'SS; xti?^^4^

06*

qq5qi5\^^

,^^

V^^\^

f^ ^ V, *-^ *" v*** ^x ^

.~*s **|H O*"

//I7Z88

A,.^^ J

•5^M-^O .^'

^'^'•2^ o

i^i*^

.^s\5 qi4

*^*\* J&"^ ~tm^^

^ , \^ ^^^ \5^x^\ v^v , \^ 3 y **^r*\ l ' V \. ^*^ V v,^A^ K ,--

^^S^^ '.-** \^-

O^v^ j \W i-J" V . v*

I//7453 ^

U^

foP'-

'\ ^V;. v*1 -^^---Vv^v o

\

4t,

l

m *. ' *

LOTIO

l'lL.C7T q UOT (Q

. i5/480 OON 4QZI20E

PROTEROZOICJtxiry /oneous Cey^

l—— Xeno/'tnic O

l ^ UTewaTeT (jfoup

Onopinq pormofion

ranop*i v r

Grano )

ina

L, Neck

——l i

B

er^Ur (b)

i-ruFILTF l L ST

t/act "* neck

Psi cither inequivoca l ly b ora

r Co)

a

rruF ILTF 'LST

ke TUF"A^T LT F ' bf* CK*

LST ' lapi'1'S/on

i To/igfion

/- ,o,n4

flu, l

'Ti i*1

J,

r-ooapaVMTl'r

f. /oin-i /i l

nor /ootr/rj

f

O An^alou, Au Co Pt Zo or M

ax nl p la

f-ulfskD po*f

FM ( OXBRIDGE E XPLORATION

14382LAKE: CLAIM BLOCK

CREIGHTON TOWNSH/P

ZSCAufc

100

X

41l11SEM2a 2.14382 CREIGHTON 220

SI52000N i 478120 E

_CONCESSION V

CONCESSION IV

i

CONCESSION IV

- CONCESSION! Ml

\

LOT l Z CREIGHTON) TWPFAIRBAMK

SUDBURY BASINFALCONBRIDGE ilMITED

i* *

5/480OONJ 47BIZOE

CRE/GHTON/ TWP

LOT 12,

411 Itf

.14383 CREIGHTON 230

LOT121 L.OTM uorio

FALCONBRIDGE EXPLORATION

.EMMA LAKE CLAIM

* *

DRAWN BY

DATE

SCALE6QOO

1:2*00ZOO

481970 Ein wg-o o

o o-O)CNITLO

41M1SEM20 2.14382 CREIGHTON 240

O O

O)

o481970 E 485770 E

N

SBS25 5B5QO 58475 58450 58425 584QQ 58375 58350 58325 5B3QO 58275 58250 58225 58200 58175 58150 5B125 S81QO 58075 58000

Total Field

LEGEND CONTOUR INTERVAL (gamma)————— 50 ( lower than 58500 gamma )

————— 200_____ 1000

Reading - total field - 58200 gamma

Instrument: EDA OMNI PLUS

Index for1-5000 Folio Base Sheet

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

MOORE LAKE

t A Q O O MAGNETIC SURVEYJ. * O O /C TOOL HELD CnflDUB

Date 1991

ExMuttd by : M d'Or Ltd

IntvpnM by: C lambert. Ping.

Owing no. : 91-879-1.1

Apprwedby

no*

Seal* : 1 : 5000 (metm) SO Q SO 106 150

Ul.~*W

l

41II1SEM20 2.14382 CREIGHTON S50

O—o

IrLO

2- l

Oo00

4-82020 E

fN

58550 58500 58475 58450 58425 58400 58375 58350 58325 58300 S8275 58250 5B225 50200 58175 58150 58125 58100 58050

Total FieldCOB***}

LEGENDCONTOUR INTERVAL (gamma)

50 ( lower than 58500 gamma )

200

1000

Reading - total field - 58200 gamma

Instalment: EDA OMNI PLUS

Index forV5000 Folio Base Sheet

M.KI

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

EMM UKE - MIDZONE

4382 MAGNETIC SURVEYTOW. HEU) CONTOURS

Date : Jra 1M1

EkMuted by : W tfOr Ltd

ntopnM by: ft lflmb*t Piho.Drawing m. : Qt-67t-1.1-E

AppraMdly

Pun no*

Sod*50

1 : 5000 O SO 106 150

474470 Ein-A

ino10—Oo

l

l

41M1SEM28 2.H382 CREIGHTON 260

\

N

5B550 5BEOO 5B475 5B450 5S425 5B400 5B375 5B350 5B325 5B3QO 5BZ75 58250 SB225 SB200 58175 58150 58125 58100 58050

Total FieldC6a.ii*)

LEGENDCONTOUR INTERVAL (gamma)

50 ( lower than 58500 gamma )

200

1000

Reading = total field - 58200 gamma

Instrument: EDA OMNI PLUS

Index for1:5000 Folio Base Sheet

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

EMM LAKE-MlOZONE SOUTH

MAGNETIC SURVEYTOTAL (TED CONTOURS

Date : Jm 1991

EJncuUd by : Vd fOr CMphywqut Ltd

l478270 E

Intvpntod by: 6 Lambtrt

Drawing no. ; 8V479-1.1-W

Appremdby

Pfcni no*

Soato50

: 500050 1

481970 E Ui ltn

o o

485770 El

oo enwID

2.

o o•1—O)

10

41l11SEM2a 2.143B2 CREIGHTON 270 485770 E

\

N

LEGENDINTERPRETATION.LJthological unit of increased magnetic susceptibility. Mafic to ultramafic plutonic rocks, iron formations, mafic dykes.

LJthological unit having a negative magnetic relief (magnetic low). Possibly associated with a hydrothermally altered zone or a major fracture zone Felsic unit.

Depth and dip estimates for magnetic units.

Interpreted shear zone

Interpreted fault.

LEGENDMAGNETIC PROFILES.————— Total Reid 1 cm - 1000 gamma.

Relative zero for Total Held ~ 58200 gamma.

Reading.Total Field

- 58200 (gamma)

Instrument: EDA OMNI PLUS Magnetometer

165

Index for

1.5000 Folio Base Sheet

FALCONBRIDGE UMITEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

14382 MAGNETIC SURVEYTOTA. FIELD PROFILE

Date : Jm 1W1

EucutMl by : M tfOr Ltd

IntopnM by: C ktmbirt

Drawing ra. : OM79-1.2

Plan no.

Seato50

: 500050 1

(imtmj 06 ISO

41 111SEM20 Z . H382 CREIGHTON 280

482020 E

o o—O)

LO

tO

LEGENDNTERPRETATION.Lithologfcal unit of increased magnetic susceptibility. Mafic to ultramafic plutonic rocks, iron formations, mafic dykes.

LJthological unit having a negative magnetic relief (magnetic low). Possibly associated with a hydrothermally altered zone or a major fracture zone. Felsic unit.

Depth and dip estimates for magnetic units.

Interpreted shear zone

Interpreted fault.

LEGENDMAGNETIC PROFILES._____ Total Reid

Relative zero for Total Field

Reading"Total Field

- 58200 (gamma)

1 cm ^ 1000 gamma

58200 gamma.

165-r

Instrument: EDA OMNI PLUS Magnetometer

Index for1:5000 Folio Base Sheet

KM!

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

EUMAL/KE- Ml OZONE

o o00

482020 E

MAGNETIC SURVEYTOTAL FIELD PRQFHB

Date : JUne 1 901

EJtMuUd by

IntvpraM by:Drawing no. : 01-679-U-E

Approved fay :

(imbw) 100 150

474470 Euiin oJO—o o

l

l478270 E

o o

o

41HISEM28 2.14382 CREIGHTON 230

N

LEGEND

LJthologlcal unit of increased magnetic susceptibility. Mafic to ultramafic plutonic rocks, iron formations, mafic dykes.

LJthological unit having a negative magnetic relief (magnetic low). Possibly associated with a hydrothermally altered zone or a major fracture zone. Felsic unit.

Depth and dip estimates for magnetic units

Interpreted shear zone

Interpreted fault.

LEGENDMAGNETIC PROFILES————— Total Reid 1 cm = 1000 gamma.

Relative zero for Total Reid = 58200 gamma.

Reading'Total Reid

- 58200 (gamma)

Instrument: EDA OMNI PLUS Magnetometer

Index for1.5000 Folio Base Sheet

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

QW IMS. - M IDZONE SOUTH

MAGNETIC SURVEYTOTAL F1E1JD PROFILES

Date : Jure 1991

Executed by : Val rfOr Gwphyriqu* Ltd

IntvpnM by: a Lamtavt P.EOQ.

Drmringm. : 91-679-U-W

Approved by :

Pun no*

Seato : 1 : 5000 (iratrw) SO O SO 100 150

481970 E w l^k

Ul8-8Z

485770 Cl

o o—O)CSin in \

N

LEGENDINTERPRETATION.

u \

H \

Relatively low resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock valley, thicker overburden, with or without an associated tectonic structure.

Relatively high resistivity unit with respect to immediatesurroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, more resistive lithological unit.

Well—defined Maxmm H.L E M bedrock conductor Conductanc higher than 40 mhos Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to semi-massive mineralisation.

—CO——OD—Low conductivity Maxmin H LE M conductor, lower than 20 mhos Causes possibly metallic: Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated mineralisation. Or electrolytic- conductive tectonic structure.

Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors

Interpreted shear zone.

Interpreted fault.

ELECTROMAGNEnC PROFILES.In— phase

———— Out-of-phase

Headings:In-Phase 2-T-2

1 cm. = 20

1 cm. ~ 20

Out-of-phase

Instrument APEX MAXMIN II

Index forV5000 Foho Base Sheet

/v *5 ^FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED^ JVC ERRINGTON 264

MOORE LAKE

4IM1SEM2* 2.14382 CREIGHTON 300

O O*OSrf

l S

485770 E

ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY - 1777 Hz CABLE - 100 m.

Date 1991

Eucutedby : \M Ltd

IntvpreM by: C Unnbwt. P-Eng.

Orming no. : 01-679-13

AppraMd*

HMD no.

Soato 1 : 5000 O 50 106 160

478220 E

41I11SEM2* 3.14383 CREIGHTON 310

482020 El

o o—O)

in

\

O OGO

n482020 E

N

LEGENDINTERPRETATION.

L— s

——CO——GO—

Relatively low resistivity unit with respect to immediatesurroundings. Bedrock valley, thicker overburden, withor without an associated tectonic structure

Relatively high resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, more resistive hthological unit.

Well-defined Maxmin H.L E.M bedrock conductor Conductanc j higher than 40 mhos Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to semi-massive mineralisation.

Low conductivity Maxmin H.LE M. conductor, lower than 20 mhos Causes possibly metallic: Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated mineralisation. Or electrolytic: conductive tectonic structure.

.Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors

Interpreted shear zone.

Interpreted fault.

ELECTROMAGNOC PROFILES.—————— In—phase

————— Out—of—phase

.Readings:In-Phase 2-f--2

1 cm = 20 %

1 cm. - 20 7.

Out-of-phase

Instrument APEX MAXMIN II

Irxtex for

115000 Folio Base Sheet

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED^ JVC ERRINGTON 264O EMMA LAKE - Ml D ZONE

ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY - 1777 Hz CABLE - 100 m.

Date : June 1991

Val d-Or GMphynqw Ltd

IntvpnM by: C Lairttrt. PJEnq.

Drawing ne. : 91-679-U-E

Appnwdby :

Plan no.

Seal*50

1 : 5000 (iMbw) 50 100 150

474470 E in lin o ID—

an

41I11SEM2* 2.14382 CREIGHTON 320

478270 E

LEGENDINTERPRETATION.

Relatively low resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock valley, thicker overburden, with or without an associated tectonic structure.

Relatively high resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, more resistive lithaloqical unit.

Well-defined Maxmm H.L E .M bedrock conductor Conductancfe higher than 40 mhos Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to semi—massive mineralisation.

.Low conductivity Maxmin H.L.E.M. conductor, lower than 20 mhos Causes possibly metallic: Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated mineralisation. Or electrolytic conductive tectonic structure.

--00——OD—

.Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors

Interpreted shear zone.

Interpreted fault.

ELECTROMAGNEIIC PROFILES.1 cm ~ 20 7.

1 cm. - 2Q Z

In—phase

———— Out-of-phase

In-Phase r,

Instrument APEX MAXMIN

Out-of-phase 55

Index for

1-5000 Folio Base Sheet

FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED. JVC ERRINGTON 264

O Q, V, EMMA LAKE-MIDZONE SOUTH

ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY - 1777 Hz CAKE - 100 m.

Val tfOr GtonhfliaM Ltd

Intnreted by: 6 Lambert. P-Eng.

478270 E

481970 Ein uig-o o

4-85770 El Z

O O—enCMin

N

LEGENDINTERPRETATION.

"^ Relatively low resistivity unit with respect to immediate J^^ surroundings. Bedrock valley, thicker overburden, with

or without an associated tectonic structure.

""v Relatively high resistivity unit with respect to immediate JJ )* surroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, more

resistive lithological unit.

Well—defined Maxmm H.LE M. bedrock conductor. Conductance higher than 40 mhos. Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to semi-massive mineralisation.

Low conductivity Maxmin H.L.E.M. conductor, lower than 20 mhos. Causes possibly metallic: Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated mineralisation. Or electrolytic, conductive tectonic structure.

Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors

Interpreted shear zone.

Interpreted fault.

ELB^IROMAGNETIC PROFILES.In—phase

———— Out-of—phase

Headings:In-Phase

Z

Instrument APEX MAXMIN II

1 cm = 20

1 cm. = 20

l 2 Out-of-of-phase

Index for1:5000 Folio Base Sheet

vKMI

.CONBRIDGE LIMITEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

MOORE LAKE

41ll1SEM2e 2.14382 CREIGHTON 330

O _O

O)"tl s

4-85770 E

ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY - 444 HE CABLE - 100 m.

Dote : Jtae 1M1

EMouMby : VU df* Ud

IntvpnM by: C IflirtMrt P-Eng.

Drawing no. : 91-679-12

Ptai no.

Seal* : 1 : 5000 (imtm) SO O 50 100 150

41I11SEM2* 2.14383 CREIGHTON 340

OO—O)

LOT-

m

Oo00

l482020 E

M

LEGENDINTERPRETATION.

("LRelatively low resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock valley, thicker overburden, with or without an associated tectonic structure.

l Relatively high resistivity unit with respect to immediatesurroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, more resistive lithological unit.

Well-defined Maxmin H.LE.M. bedrock conductor. Conductanc higher than 40 mhos. Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to semi-massive mineralisation.

.Low conductivity Maxmin H.LE.M conductor, lower than 20 mhos. Causes possibly metallic: Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated mineralisation. Or electrolytic: conductive tectonic structure.

Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors

Interpreted shear zone.

Interpreted fault.

ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES.In—phase

————— Out-of—phase

.Readings:In-Phase

%

Instrument APEX MAXMIN

2 4--2

1 cm. = 20 %

1 cm. ~ 20 7.

Out-of-phase K

Index forV5000 Folio Base Sheet

KM*

AO 9}O

FALCONBRIDGE UMITEDH*JVC ERRINGTON 264

OIKIAKE-MIDZONE

ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY . 444 Hr OWE - 100 m.

Dale : June 1 991

Encutadby : Val rfOr GMphyriqw

Intvprated by: C Lambert PJEnq.

Drawing no. : 91-fl79-i2-E

Apprawdby :

Pun no*

Scot. : 1 : 5000 (imbw) 50 O 50 100 150

-r i TT r w t.inv\ o 10-o o

\\.

24H1ISEM20 2.14382 CREIGHTON 3S0

N

LEGENDNTERPREJATION.

Relatively low resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. oearocK vaney, tnicxer overouraen, wnn or without an associated tectonic structure.

Relatively high resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, more resistive lithological unit.

Well-defined Maxmin H.L.E.M bedrock conductor. Conductanc higher than 40 mhos. Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to semi-massive mineralisation.

.Low conductivity Maxmin H.LE.M. conductor, lower than 20 mhos. Causes possibly metallic: Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated mineralisation. Or electrolytic: conductive tectonic structure.

.Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors

Interpreted shear zone.

Interpreted fault.

ELBCTROMA3NETTC PROFILES.————— In—phase

———— Out-of-phase.Readings:

In-Phase 2+-Z

1 cm ~ 20 7,

1 cm. - 20 X

Out-of-phase

Instrument APEX MAXMIN II

Index for1:5000 Folio Base Sheet

FALCONBRIDGE UMITEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

EMM LAKE - MIDZONE SOUTH

ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY - 444 Hi CABUT - 100 m.

Date 4m 1M1

Executed by : \M tfOr Ltd

Inlvpnted fey! ft LmnMftt

478270 E Dravint no. : 81-679-U-W

Appramdby :

Pun no.

Seato50

1 : 5000 (imtrw) 50 100 150

481970 Eining-o o

lo oO)CM

lO

T O OOJ

HIII1SEM2* 2.I43B2 CREIGHTON 360l

485770 E

fN

LEGENDII^TTERPREJATION.

H \

Relatively low resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock valley, thicker overburden, with or without an associated tectonic structure.

Relatively high resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, more resistive lithological unit.

Well—defined Maxmin H.LE.M bedrock conductor Conductance higher than 40 mhos Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to semi-massive mineralisation.

Low conductivity Maxmin H LE.M. conductor, -— ^ rrv -.- lower than 20 mhos. Causes possibly metallic:

Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated mineralisation. Or electrolytic: conductive tectonic structure.

Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors

Interpreted shear zone.

Interpreted fault.

ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES.————— In—phase

———— Out-of-phaae

Readings:In-Phase

Instrument APEX MAXMIN II

1 cm. = 40 %

1 cm. - 40 7.

Out-of-phase

Index for1.5000 Folio Base Sheet

FALCONBRIDGE UMfTEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

MOORE LAKE

ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY - 3555 Hi CABLE - 100 m.

Date JUne 1991

Snouted by : \tt d-Or Lid

IntvpraM tay: 6 Lqrrtnrt PJhg.

Orawig ne. : 01-679-3.4

Ptan no.

Seale : 1 : 9000 (imbw) 50 O 50 100 160

eo-*J

u •ooyoin

lT)

•oa

uo

Sc

o

o

3i l

oOT DOLj"^-*

O

o -a

O

3

a l

-

?Q

. \

± s(Bl"

Q. lC

y•s

s e-

w

exc

l lf)E

is\

i iJ

LJ Os-CM

N 006191. SN OCHSfrLS

UJ

o—

CM

O

(M

iti^to^ss*-1'' ..^

G

K

P)

in v\g-o o

41II1SEM2* 2.H3S2 CREIGHTON 380

N

LEGENDINTERPRETATION.Relatively low resistivity unit with respect to Immediate surroundings. Bedrock valley, thicker overburden, with or without an associated tectonic structure.

Relatively high resistivity unit with respect to immediate surroundings. Bedrock ridge, thinner overburden, more resistive lithological unit.

Well—defined Maxmin H.L.E.M. bedrock conductor Conductanc higher than 40 mhos. Definitely metallic causes, continuous, massive to semi-massive mineralisation.

Low conductivity Maxmin H.L.E.M. conductor, lower than 20 mhos. Causes possibly metallic: Discontinuous, stringer or disseminated mineralisation. Or electrolytic: conductive tectonic structure.

.Depth, conductance and dip estimates of bedrock conductors

Interpreted shear zone.

Interpreted fault.

ELECTROMAGNOC PROFILES.————— In—phase

——,——, Out-of-phase

Headings:In-Phase ?J--7

Instrument APEX MAXMIN II

1 cm. - 40 X

1 cm. - 40 Z

Out-of-phase 7,

Index for1.5000 Folio Base Sheet

pNBRIDGE LIMITEDJVC ERRINGTON 264

EMM LAKE - MIDZONE SOUTH

ELECTROMAGNETIC H.E.M. SURVEYFREQUENCY - 3655 Hz CAKE - 100 m.

Dote : June 1991

Executed by : Val tfOr GMohyiiqu* Lid

l478270 E

IntvpnM by: a Lamtart P.Eng.

Drwhvne. : 91-879-3.4-W

Ptan no.

Scat* : 1 : 5000 fimtm) 50 O 50 106 150