42AMSee399 2 .7526 MANN 010

SELCO DIVISION

BP RESOURCES CANADA LIMITED

GRID 180-5 - PROPERTY 5

TIMMINS PROJECT

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

PROCUPINE MINING DIVISION

GEOPHYSICAL REPORT

M. Berezowskyj, P.Eng. November, 1984

KECEfVED

- 7 1984

LANDS SECTION

GRID 180-5 - P-5 - TIMMINS PROJECT

INTRODUCTION

During the winter of 1984, an exploration programme consisting of linecutting, and electromagnetic and magnetic surveys was conducted over the following claims in Little (M-535) and Mann (M-541) Twps:

P780957

P780958

P780960

P780961

P780909

P780910

P780911

P780912

P780913

NE1/4, Nl/2,

NW1/4, Nl/2,

SE1/4, Nl/2,

SW1/4, Nl/2,

NW1/4, Sl/2,

NE1/4, Sl/2,

SW1/4, Sl/2,

SE1/4, Sl/2,

SW1/4, Sl/2,

lot 12, cone. VI Little Twp. lot 11, cone. VI Little Twp. lot 11, cone. VI Little Twp. lot 11, cone. VI Little Twp. lot 12, cone. I Mann Twp. lot 12, cone. I Mann Twpi lot 12, cone. I Mann Twp. lot 12, cone. I Mann Twp. lot 11, cone. I Mann Twp.

One EM anomaly was identified, but additional surveys are necessary to determine whether the conductive material is in the overburden or in the bedrock.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The property centres around the junction of 4 townships, however, the survey was conducted in claims in only two of these townships, namely Little and Mann.

A Forest Management Road linking up with the ice Chisel Lake Road and eventually Hwy. 610, passes through the property. On the claims, this road follows a low lying area and is generally not passable by truck during the summer.

-, ——— — .- — —J ———— - -l— — ..

ir -i;-

_ — _;_4____l____J/_ — — lp i p r p r p p&40I09 [ 510110 [61QIII. (540II3

l ___ l ___ -L- -4 ——— U-P

e fi f\ t l X l E A f\ l J fi

L-__I^--Jp : IP^-..

c *W9B^WS5y3Sr*'''W,-j^Hl(Bftji

----i----

- 2 -

PROPERTY OWNERSHIIP

The claims are held by BP Resources Canada Ltd. Licence No. T190.

PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

The results of the electromagnetic and magnetic surveys are plotted on separate plans at a scale of 1:2500. TI.3752, 3752BU&2).

PREVIOUS WORK

Although the area has been staked several times in the past, there is no record of any work having been filed for assessment credit. (Timmins Data Series Maps P-728, P-728 rev., P-755, P755 rev., P-2308).

GENERAL GEOLOGY

The property lies within the Timmins portion of the Abitibi Volcanic - Plutonic Belt. Although outcrops are generally very rare in the area, one cluster of outcrops is shown at the junction of the 4 townships - Tully, Little, Duff and Mann. These outcrops indicated on map P-728 have been identified as andesite-basalt flows. On the grid, these outcrops would occur somewhere near LlOOmE, 200mS, about 400m south of the EM anomaly.

O.G.S. maps 2484 and 2205 are the best available compilations of the regional geology.

- 3 -

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY RESULTS

Horizontal Loop Electromagnetic Survey

An Apex Max-Min II horizontal loop unit with a 250 metre coil separation and frequencies of 1777 Hz and 444 Hz was used to survey the grid. Data was recorded as the in-phase and out of phase percentage of the primary field, and plotted as a graph at a scale of 1mm = l*.

Magnetic Survey

The instruments used were a Geometrics G-816 total field proton precession magnetometer and a Geometrics G-826A recording base station magnetometer. The data was reduced for diurnal variations using the analogue output of the base station recorder coupled with "check-in" stations established on the grid. The data was plotted at 1:2500 and contoured by Dataplotting Services Ltd. of Toronto.

General

Both EM and magnetometer readings were taken at 25 metre intervals on lines spaced 100 metres apart. When anomalous conditions occurred, station spacing was reduced to 12.5 metres.

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The EM survey results indicate a single anomaly extending from LlOOmE to LSOOmE, at approximately 200mN. For most of its length, this anomaly follows the north margin of a low, swampy area flanking a creek.

- 4 -

The high negative out of phase readings and the poor in-phase to out of phase ratios in the area of the conductor axis suggest that the conductive source is in the overburden rather than in the bedrock.

The magnetic survey results show almost no variation in the magnetic susceptibility of the underlying rocks. Except for a slight increase of almost lOOnT on the most eastern 4 lines, most of the readings fall within a range of 60nT.

REOWMENDftTIONS

(1) The area of the Max-Min II anomaly should be surveyed with Pulse EM unit to determine whether the Max-Min II ancmal has a conductive source in the overburden or in the

M. Berezowsky Senior Geolog November, 1984

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

9) TIMMINS - P5 The Minir 42A14SE*3e9 2.7526 MANN 900Type of Survey(s)

Geophysical AJ j()Township or Area

M541Claim Holder(s)

BP Resources Canada LimitedProspector's Licence No.

T190

55 University Ave., Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7Sul Date of Survey (from fi to)

Mo/Pi.

rvey CompanyBP Resources Canada Limited

Day l Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut8.5

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)Miron Berezowskyj - 55 University Ave., Suite 1700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days, (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer ^^•*-*^ ^^^^r&f^

-^s^?*t V

Days per Claim

20

40

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

^\

•mExpenditures (exclud^powaf^nisjin^ ^ v . V^7 \Type of Work PerformedX f-Tv Y? \S) . \lf

\W* o/^V*;Performed on Claim(s) \ \}\* . " \ .\ ^\^\W'^

\ u , ^^.^^^itfi>^\^^

Calculation of Expenditure Days*Credits Total

Total Expenditures Days Credits

S -i- 15 *Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

P,'.-- : \fs,

s-.x.vi&j. . " '-.,S -^

-iS|fl*i'S(,y.t*

, ' ',\ j- y?

I'^SIMfV^

t* "

fc. -

3

c ? -

f:

'at

* '

i

.V

'•j.

Number

780909

780910

780911

780912

780913

780957

780958

780960

780961

ri c f\ f^ pT* t v V/ ri

NOV 8Receipt No. Q|

/

Expend. Days Cr.

'D fn^cH

1984

-i

Mining ClaimPrefix

•fei-

(|M

••^M'

Number

EIVED

06 19fl4

|NDS SECTION

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Date Recorded

lU*}. r l ptDate Approved as Recorde

I hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

M. Berezowsky-j - 55 University Ave., Snit.R 1700, TnrnntnDate Certified

Nov. 2, 1984M5.I 2H7

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

Timmins - PS

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT,

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION. CONCLUSIONS ETC.

iEd

lU* f*O

Type of Survey(s) GeophysicalTownship or Area M553 and M541—————.^—. Claim Holder(s) BP Resources Canada Limited

55 University Ave., Suite 1700

Survey Company BP Resources Canada Limited Author of Report Miron Berezowskyj ____' -Address of Author 55 University Ave., Suite 170Q Covering Dates of Survey____March '84 - Oct. '84

Total Miles of Line Cut —.——(linecutting to office)

8.5____

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical —Electromagnetic.

DAYS per claim

20

—Radiometric.-Other.Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne turveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATE:. SIGNATURES-i or Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications. 9,3 S6 SPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSEDLift numerically

P

P

. 780909{..,.i..t....i...t.....r..i....ioi.i...... prefix) (number)P 780910

780911

780912

780913

780957

780958

780960

780961

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (6/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations BM11 MAG*466___________Number of Readings Bfr4H MAG-406 Station interval _____25jn___________________..Line sparing lOQm ———-—Profile scale______lmm;ll_____________________: ________ :. ._____Contour interval Every 10 Gammas to 150 _________________________

Every 50 Gammas thereafter , - -.

Instrument____Geometrics G-816_________________ r ".",".". - ' ______

S ZC

o

o

lJ

o

,— 1Accuracy — Scale constant,Diurnal correction method Base StationBase Station check-in interval (hours)___________ '' ' ' ' . ' '' ' ____—, Base Station location and value Intersection of Base Lines' and Pass'Lines'.

Instrument Apex Max-Min II

Coil configuration Hnri7.nrit.fl1 Coil separation AccuracyMethod: D Fixed transmitter D Shoot back GuHfTline D Parallel line

1777 Hz(ipedfy V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured In-phase and quadrature components of secondary fieldas a percentage of primary field.

Instrument _______________________________________________Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

^,25N*H

Od3h— i /*\2QM U*jQZ

^frHC/3HH

Mti

Method D Time Domain D Frequency DomainParameters - On time , Frequency ..,.,,.,,,, n ,, , , , ,, ,...

-Off time Range..,, ,,, .,, , ,. ........ ..., ,,,, ,,.,....T^f*1a\7 t i in P

— Integration time

Pnwer —————————————————————————————————————————————————

Electrode array —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————Electrode spacing —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —Type of electrode —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

SELF POTENTIALInstrument————————————————-,——————————————————————— Range.Survey Method ____________________________-,_________..——..—.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument———Values measured.Energy windows (levels)___________________________" - \ ' " -•- ' - Height of instrument________________________——.Background Count. Size of detector_______________________________ - ———.Overburden -———--———————.—————.—...—^—-.—._________;___—

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey——————————————————————Instrument ————-—.———-——.———.^^—^————- Accuracy———————————————————————————-Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ———— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy—^————————————

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used————————————————————————————————Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude———————^——^—^^.^————-i—————Line Spacing—— Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————

Drainage Development.Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p. p. m. p. p. b.

D D O

Cu, Pb,

Others.,

; 'Ni',v )Go,i.-:Agi- Mo, As,-( circle)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. :

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, icreening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis____

Extraction Method., Analytical Method.

Reagents Used__

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method—— Reagents Used^————

-tests)

.tests)

.tests)

General. General.

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No 2.

TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

J-

Signature of Assessor

Date

1985 01 07 Your Files 461/84 Our Filet 2.7626

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueT1im1ns, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Notice of Intent dated December 17, 1964. Geophysical (Electromagnetic li Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims P 760909 et ei In the Township of Mann*

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inforn the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1M3 Phone:(416)965-6918

S. Hursttse

cc: BP Resources Canada Limited 65 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario HW 2H7 Attention: Mlron BerezowskyJ

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining A Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario

J^~N. Ministry ot technical Assess)\^J Raaources Work CreditsOntario H^^

ment ™*2.7526

Date Mining Recorder's Report of1984 12 17 work No. 481/84

Recorded Holder

BP RESOURCES CANADA LIMITEDTownship or Area

MANN TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical 1 6

33Magnetometer days

Rariiflmatrie days

|nHi.ic"rt polarization . Hays

Othor days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Attested" column

Geological . . . days

Rpnrhemiral days

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision H Ground GO

Ixl Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

P 780909 to 913 inclusive 780957-58-60-61

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

[j not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological—40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77 (19)—60:

828 183/6)

Ministry ofNaturalResources

'ano

1984 12 17 Your File: 481/84 Our File: 2/7526

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

s sincerely,

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

S. Hurst:mc

Ends.

cc: BP Resources Canada Limited 55 University Avenue Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Attention: Miron Berezowskyj

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining b Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

845

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1984 12 17

2.7526/481/84

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/6)

x,

l

t

u

\ \\

vi V o

600n

E70

0 HE

800n

E9

00

nE

lOO

OriE

500n

N -

400r

.N -

300H

N -

200

N N -

BflS

E LI

NE

200n

S -

300H

S -

400h

S -

O10

0HE

200M

E16

00hE

1700

nEIS

OO

nE

- 5

00 H

.N

- 4

00hN

- 3

00N N

- 20

0

BflS

E

LIN

E

Az

I33

0

- 200

- 300nS

- 400ns

MAG

NETO

MET

ER

INST

RUM

ENT

TYPE

: GE

OMET

RICS

G-SI

GR

eadi

ngs

in C

omm

as:

l 20

Bas

e:

59,0

00

. I t

o P

rofil

e:

Con

tour

In

terv

al:

Eve

ry

10 g

amm

as

to

150

gam

mas

Ever

y SO

gam

mas

the

reaf

ter

OT

HE

R

INF

OR

MA

TIO

NS

EE

D

RW

6.

Nfi

Ti 3

7528

(182

)T

YP

EH

.L.E

.M. (1

777 H

z),

CL

AIM

S,

H.L

E.M

.( 4

44 H

z),

LOG

. P

LA

N

Scal

e h2

500

50

100

150m

42A

14S

E0399

2.7

526

MA

NN

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

N

TIM

MIN

S

PRO

JEC

T

GR

ID

ISO

- 5,

R 5

M

AG

. S

UR

VE

Y

DR

AW

N B

Y

S.J

.RB

.T

RA

CE

D B

YD

AT

AP

LO

TT

ING

C

.P.

DA

TE A

PR

IL

1984

DA

TE

JUN

E

1984

M .

T.S

.

42 A

-14-

SE

PL

AN TI.

3752

o12

00hE

1300

..E14

00nE

IBO

On

E16

00nE

1700

NE18

0CU

E

300n

N -

300

MS -

200n

N -

-l

--6

-Z

•-6

1

-2

BflS

E

LIN

E

--6,

-2 -3

i-B

| -I

—5

4

-3

•-7

-4

200^

5 -

300d

S -

-6

-3

-6-2

.-6

-Z

—6;

-4

-7'.!

-6

-7:t

-6

-7

-7

-3

O

—6

--7

-7

4

•-4

2

•-6

1

3

-l

3

.\3 -I

-7

' -7

-7 -7

; -7

'••...

1 -i . -l s

—t

~- •~ wm

. .1 \ •: -l \

-3

--e

-s

-7•-

61

-6 -3

-3

l

•-6-

•-6

-6

• -6

-6l

..-6

'

•-6

I -5

-7.

l -5

--fi

•-6

-3

--61

2

—6

2

--6

-l

-3

l -6

•-6

--6 6

O

-.4

3

1 f '

\

a,\ —

el -4

--6

\ -

8

^. "ir9 f

•-7

l' -7

. --7

.4

-l -3

-;'-3

-2

-4

3

--3

5

• 4

s

-L

,\

•1-7

-2

•:-6

-2

r -6

-i

--6

0

* 1

- \ 1" .\ ^( *- — f L 1 •1 \

*fc. 1 \ "l •i- \

-l

9

3 3

3 l -3

-\ f: 67 el

s

-3

.i

•43

O

4 O e

/ e e

1-2

8

f 6

•-G

. O

•-.7

-4

-.-7

-2

-7

t -l

-6'

-l

* *

f -l —s -C 1 4 '1 .j 1 •1 1

^*- •l \ .1 1 1 \" •\ 1

-3

4

•T

3 3

-2

J -,

•-4

2

t '

l

f '

h 4

3 5

4 5

l 3 5

\ 3 3

M i Li, J

3 7

4 "1 J- H

-

3 l

.1

-1. rf Li

-t 4 4

-k •f 9

U,

,

-l -2

-3

O -z

•f -1'

•M -3 -2

U /-. l,

r1 n

A3 4

OlO

OnE

200n

E30

0hE

400.

.E50

0i80

0 r.E

900

nE

-i -3 -3 -2

•-S

O

: f Vf

-2-•-

:4 -z

4 -3

Ir "

(-3

O•l

I3 i

3 l

U

e

73

-l,

K-3

-2

•-B;

-5

J

^,

.-61

-4 -4 -3 -l

•-6

1 l

-2 -2

-3

l

i-2

2

•-4

l

-k

-l

n-2

' ' -i

-4

O

H l/

-2

-:J 3

-2

3 -l

-4

I

|3

l

\

'1

0

U -,

i H -*

•-e i—6

--6 .,y

-4 -3 -4 -5 -3

-5

D

l "f 0

t '

4 '

\

-43

O

^4

-l

-k

-1

li, -2

-p -1

—X

-2 -3 -3 -l

..t

"\ •\ •i A i •t i \ 1 .J \ -r •;-

* ^.

-3

O -2

-c3

3

-43

6

2 5

--2

4

f '

3 2

--4

2 -2

h -J

-3 ~5 -s -5

5 -5 -4

6*

-3

—. -1 .j •t 1 -- t .1 1 "l i

•-S

-l -2

•-s

5

•j-3

1

Z 8

•-2

8

••L

3 5

3 3

—Z

6 -3

—P;

-4

h -

61

-5 -4

-S

-2

\

1

J

4 5

-k .13

6

4

-3 -3 "4 -3 -3

1200

HE13

00H

E14

00hE

ISO

OnE

1600

wE

1700

NE

42A

14S

E0309 2

.75

26

M

AN

N210

- 3

0Q*N

- 2

00*N

1777

H

z-

lOO

nN

BRSE

LI

NE

Az

I3

30

- l

OO

nS

- 2

00..S

- 3

00

444 H

z- 3

00NN

- 2

00hN

-

100

NN

BflS

E

LIN

E

Az I

330

-

100H

S

-

200n

S

LOC

ATI

ON

P

LAN

CL

AIM

M

AP

S

M.4

66

.M.5

4I

AN

D

ELE

CTR

OM

AG

NE

TtC

IN

STR

UM

ENT

TY

PE

; A

PEX

MA

X-M

INU

HO

RIZ

ON

TAL

LOO

P (P

erce

nt

of

Prim

ary

Re

W)

Freq

uenc

y:

1777

Hz

Cobl

e Le

ngth

: 25

0m"

32

"8_

9_

^O

ut

of P

hase

(n

Phas

e: * e

—*-

Con

duct

or

Wid

th;

Prof

ile

Scal

e:

l mm

- l

0X0

Qua

drat

ure

ELE

CTR

OM

AG

NE

TtC

IN

STR

UM

ENT

TY

PE

; A

PEX

MA

X-M

INU

HORI

ZONT

AL

LOOP

(Pe

rcen

t of

Prim

ary

FieW

) Fr

eque

ncy:

44

4 Hz

Ca

bte

Leng

th:

250m

In P

hase

:.— . —

— f

^ .—

J?

* 4

l e

, Q

uadr

atur

e"6

1 -|

Con

duct

or

Wid

t h ;

Prof

ile

Scal

e:

l mm

M 0

Xo

OT

HE

R

INF

OR

MA

TIO

NS

EE

D

RW

6. N

4

TI3

752

TY

PE

MAG

.

Scal

e h2

500

O 50

10

0 15

0m

EX

PLO

RA

TIO

N

TIM

MIN

S PR

OJE

CT

GRI

D 180-5

, R

5——

H.L

.E.M

. SU

RVE

YS

DR

AW

N B

Y S.R

.B.

TR

AC

ED

BY

DA

TAP

LOTT

ING

C

.R

DA

TE A

PR

IL

1984

DA

TE

JUN

E

19

84

N.T

.S.

42A

-I4S

EP

LA

N

TI37

52B

(ia2)