rs and gis integration course (grs-60312) introduction · assessment ii assessment strategy...
TRANSCRIPT
RS and GIS Integration Course (GRS-60312)
Introduction
Arnold Bregt, Ron van Lammeren, Arend Ligtenberg, John Stuiver,
Sytze de Bruin, Harm Bartholomeus, Aldo Bergsma, Philip Wenting, Jan
Clevers, Martin Herold and Lammert Kooistra (Course Coordinator)
Why integration: knowledge and skills
After MGI, students have:
• Advanced Knowledge
• Professional and academic competences
• Problem and solution oriented attitude
• Critical attitude
• Interdisciplinary attitude
Why integration: key GI drivers
after presentation Herold and Bregt 11-12-13: 10 years MGI alumni
From niche to mainstream: tom tom & google earth
Integrated sensing: big data
Dynamic World: living map
You-Network: crowd sourcing
... more (big) data, more detail, more integration, more impact ... more need for experts and networking
Why integration: sensor vs. user centric
Sensing techniques / methods
Data
Information
Decision
making
Decision
making
Decision makers
Sensor-
centr
ic v
iew
U
ser-c
entric
vie
w
Why integration: Innovation in geo-business!
to
Scientist Consultant
source: www.magicmud.com
From
Things to do this morning
First half:
● Background course: modules, assessment, …
● Planning
● Academic Consultancy Training (ACT): objective, planning, …
● Project groups
● Fieldwork and excursion issues
Second half:
● Communications skills I
Learning outcomes RGIC (GRS60312)
Design an integrated monitoring system for a specified environmental process according to the concepts of integration in the geo-information cycle.
Contribute interactively to the determination of the goals of a project with a client (third party) and formulate a project plan (define results, suitable phasing of activities and distribution of tasks among team members).
Implement formulated goals through design and test of a processing protocol for calibration or validation of a geo-spatial model.
Select and integrate information gathered in their disciplinary field into a project deliverable as appropriate to the interdisciplinary design and in conformity to disciplinary quality standards.
Demonstrate the understanding of the proper use of GIS- and remote sensing concepts, methods and data when carrying out a project from A to Z.
Communicate and co-operate effectively with group members, client, process coach, content expert and other parties involved during the various stages of the project.
Accomplishing tasks within given constraints on time and other resources.
Assess the contribution of themselves, team members and other stakeholders on team functioning and execution of project tasks and appropriately reflect on these and give feedback in writing and verbally.
RGIC general set-up
Academic Consultancy Training (ACT) project (20 d) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Project proposal Analysis Report & Presentation
+ excursions: 2 days
Management skills
Project management
Communication (2 d)
Geo-skills GSNS LBS
Field Spectroscopy
(4 d)
Design of Integrated Monitoring System (DIMS: 9 d)
DIMS vs. ACT
Science and Society
Societal benefit
Discussion and decision support
Scientific proposal
Commissioner
Problem oriented
Business (case) oriented
Project plan and consultancy report
Modules and objectives
Module Group composition
End-product Contact
Design of Integrated Monitoring System
ACT teams Report DIMS and presentation incl. demonstrator
Lammert Kooistra
Fieldwork ACT teams Validation and fieldwork plan
Lammert Kooistra
Excursion ACT teams Presentation and discussion (incl. reflection paper)
John Stuiver Lammert Kooistra
ACT project ACT teams Proposal + end-product + process
Lammert Kooistra
Assessment I
No final exam
Course will be evaluated as follows:
● DIMS (40%)
● ACT project (60%) (details in assessment III)
All parts of the course have to be sufficient (5.5 at least) to pass the course.
Assessment II
Assessment strategy (Toetsplan) GRS-60312 RS & GIS Integration Course
rep
ort
des
ign
mo
nit
ori
ng
syst
em
valid
atio
n a
nd
fie
ldw
ork
pla
n
pre
sen
tati
on
dem
on
stra
tor
mo
nit
ori
ng
syst
em
pro
ject
pla
n c
on
sult
ancy
pro
ject
fin
al p
rod
uct
co
nsu
ltan
cy p
roje
ct
coac
h a
sses
smen
t p
roce
ss
mu
tual
ass
essm
ent
pro
cess
1 Design an integrated monitoring system for a specified environmental process according to the concepts of integration in the geo-information cycle X X X
2 Formulate a project plan (define results, suitable phasing of activities and distribution of tasks among team members)
and contribute interactively to the determination of the goals of the project with a client (third party). X
3 Design and test a processing protocol for calibration or validation of a geo-spatial model according to the formulated project goals. X X
4 Select and integrate information gathered in their disciplinary field and produce a project deliverable as appropriate
to the interdisciplinary design and in conformity to disciplinary quality standards. X X
5 Demonstrate the understanding of the proper use of GIS- and remote sensing concepts, methods and data when carrying out a project from A to Z. X X
6 Analyze and reflect on communication and co-operation with group members, client, process coach, content expert and
other parties involved during the various stages of the project. X
7 Organize and accomplish tasks within given constraints on time and other resources. X X
8 Assess the contribution of themselves, team members and other stakeholders on team functioning and execution of
project tasks and appropriately reflect on these and give feedback in writing and verbally.X
contribution to final mark (%) 25 5 10 10 25 12,5 12,5
Planning I
week 1
Monday May 12 (C30) Tuesday May 13 (C30) Wednesday May 14 (C30) Thursday May 15 Friday May 16
Morning (8:30-12:15) intro course/project (LK) 8:30 kick-off meeting DIMS 8:30 projectman (AB) DIMS: design DIMS: design
Communications Skills I
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) first meeting coach preparation meeting
(RL, SB, HB, JS, AL, LK) feedback session commissioner deadline expectation paper
week 2
Monday May 19 Tuesday May 20( C30 ) Wednesday May 21 Thursday May 22 ( C30 ) Friday May 23
Morning (8:30-12:15) meeting commissioner Intro DIMS (RL): DIMS: design Intro DIMS (LK):fieldwork project proposal
communication & and validation plan
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) project proposal visualization
week 3
Monday May 26 Tuesday May 27 Wednesday May 28 Thursday May 29 Friday May 30
Morning (8:30-12:15) project proposal DIMS:fieldwork or design feedback fieldwork plan holiday project proposal
deadline concept proposal deadline fieldwork plan Ascenion Day
Afternoon (13:15-17:15)
deadline final proposal
week 4
Monday June 2 Tuesday June 3 Wednesday June 4 Thursday June 5 Friday June 6
Morning (8:30-12:15) fieldwork Skills for geo-business in Achterhoek near Groenlo (5 overnight stays) Communication Skills II
GNSS (PW, LK) field spectroscopy DIMS: validation fieldwork DIMS: validation fieldwork
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) (HB, JC, LK)
13:00 return to Wageningen
Planning II
week 5
Monday June 9 Tuesday June 10 ( C30 ) Wednesday June 11 Thursday June 12 Friday June 13
Morning (8:30-12:15) holiday Analysis phase Analysis phase Analysis phase
Whit Monday deadline DIMS report
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) DIMS: final presentations
(LK, RL, MH)
week 6
Monday June 16 Tuesday June 17 Wednesday June 18 Thursday June 19 Friday June 20
Morning (8:30-12:15) analysis phase excursion CGI and analysis phase analysis phase analysis phase
van den Borne Aardappelen
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) (JS, LK)
week 7
Monday June 23 Tuesday June 24 Wednesday June 25 Thursday June 26 Friday June 27
Morning (8:30-12:15) analysis phase excursion SHELL, ESRI analysis phase analysis phase analysis phase
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) (JS, LK)
week 8
Monday June 30 Tuesday July 1 Wednesday July 2 Thursday July 3 Friday July 4
Morning (8:30-12:15) reporting reporting prepare presentation presentations projects evaluation meeting
FORUM C221 with coach
Afternoon (13:15-17:15) (RL, SB, HB, JS, AL, LK)
deadline project report deadline reflection paper
Open innovation: connecting in geo-business
Steven Johnson:
Where good ideas come from
TED talk: start at 12:20
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0af00UcTO-c
Story on the invention of GPS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Johnson_(author)
Course philosophy
Real life: different activities
Independence
Own responsibility
Keep an eye on the process
● group
● yourself
Grab the opportunity to learn how to do geo-business
… and have fun!
Academic Consultancy Training (ACT)
Academic Consultancy Training (ACT)
Content
Project topic
Project proposal
Report
Final presentation
Process
Team: roles, meeting skills, negotiation, etc.
Individual: learning outcomes, reflection
Communication with commissioner, expert, coach
you
team
commissioner
coach
expert
Course guide ACT in RGIC
Course guide available on website
Project Management Skills (Wed May 14: 8:30)
Communication Skills I + II
Available rooms and computer facilities
Team site
Tracking the process:
self assessment dossier
Goal: to structure the monitoring of your progress on aims of course and self-defined learning outcomes
Basis for coach to assess process of student
Application letter: motivation project choice + CV
Expectation paper: self-assessment + learning outcomes
Reflection paper: reflection on outcomes and progress
Interviews (2x): individual between coach and student
Assessment III
ACT module is 60% of complete mark of RGIC course
ACT assessment composed of following parts:
Written self assessment (passed (Go) or failed (No Go))
Project proposal (15%) (coach 50% + SPM teacher 50%)
Product (42.5%) (50% - expert, 25% coach, 25% commissioner) Note: The oral presentation part of the final product is included in the mark of the coach.
Process (42.5%) (50% coach, 50% mutual assessment team) Note: The mark of the coach is leading for the average mark of the students’ mutual assessment and when students are treated unfairly (too high or too low grades) during the mutual assessment, the coach may overrule such mutual assessments
ACT planning 2014 Schedule ACT RS&GIS Integration Course Date Time Room
week activity
1 Start of course + Communication Skills (part I) Mon 12-May 8.30 - 12.15 C30
Meeting with team coach Mon 12-May from 13:30 planned 2 h tbd
Training project management Wed 14-May 8.30 - 12.15 C30
Prepare first meeting with commissioner Wed 14-May 13.15 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Hand in expectation paper Fri 16-May by email to team coach
2 First visit to commissioner Mon 19-May appointment
Work on project proposal Mon 19-May 13.15 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Personal starting interview Mon-Wed 20-23-May appointment with team coach
Work on project proposal Fri 23-May 8.15 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
3 Work on project proposal Mon 26-May 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Hand in concept project proposal before 17:00 Mon 26-May by email to coach
Discussion of proposal (1 hour per team) plus
written feedback on main points
Wed 28-May appointment between 10.00 - 12.00
Work on project proposal Fri 30-May 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Hand in final proposal before 17:00 Fri 30-May by email to coach
4 Teacher gives written feedback plus mark
for proposal before Wednesday 12.00
Wed 4-June
Communication skills (part II) Fri 6-June 8.30 - 12.15 Groenlo
5 Work on project: analysis phase Wed-Fri 11-13-June 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
6 Work on project: analysis phase Mon-Fri 16-20-June 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
Midterm meeting + introduction mutual assessment Mon 16-June appointment with team coach
7 Work on project: analysis phase Mon-Fri 23-27 June 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
8 Work on project: analysis phase Mon 30-June 8.30 - 17.15 PC37/PC38
hand in final product/preparation of final
presentation before 17.00 Tue 1-July by email to coach and client
hand in final reflection paper Wed 2-July by email to coach
presentation of the project Thur 3-July appointment tbd
final team assessment Fri 4-July appointment coach
final performance interview Fri 4-July appointment coach
Team planning
code topic Organization commissioner WUR
coach
WUR
expert
first meeting
commissioner
first meeting
coach RGIC14-01 Climate resilience: flood
patterns in the Zambezi
Delta
World Wildlife Fund Zambia
Elke Praagman
Lammert
Kooistra
Jan
Clevers
May 19 2014: 10:00
via skype in room C332
Gaia
May 12, 13:30
room C320
RGIC14-02 Mapping the pulse of the
city Amsterdam Municipality
Maurits de Hoog
Sytze de
Bruin
Arnold
Bregt
May 19 2014: 9:30
DRO, Weesperplein 8
Amsterdam
May 12, 13:30
room A318
RGIC14-03 Feasibility Study for a
Sustainable Energy
Production and
Savings Opportunity Map
Addwhere
Randy Benjamins
Lammert
Kooistra
John
Stuiver
May 19 2014: 13:00
Vreelandseweg 12-ws
Loenen a/d Vecht
May 12, 15:30
C320
RGIC14-04 Mapping historic and future
landscape patterns in the
cross-border landscape park
of the Rheinland
Vereniging Nederlands Cultuurlandschap
Jordi van Oort and Egbert Jaap Mooiweer
John
Stuiver
Arend
Ligtenberg
May 19 2014: 14:00
Rijksstraatweg 174
6573 DG Beek-Ubbergen
May 12, 15:30
room A318
RGIC14-05 Development of a demo app
for fauna damage
assessment with remote
sensing input
Faunafonds
Frans van Bommel
Gerbert Roerink (Alterra)
Arend
Ligtenberg
Aldo
Bergsma
May 15 (!), 2014: 14:00
BIJ12
Leidseveer 2 Utrecht
May 12, 13:30
room C332
RGIC14-06 Participatory monitoring app
for the maintenance of
floodplain trails
Radboud University Nijmegen
Jan Fliervoet, [email protected]
Roelf de Boer (Nature cooperation
Lingestreek)
Harm
Bartholom
eus
Ron van
Lammeren
May 19, 2014: 10:00
Randwijk May 13 (!),
12:00-13:30
room A318
RGIC14-07 Asbestos detection and
analysis for risk
management use
Achmea Agro
Stefan van Harn [email protected]
Tom Vollebergh [email protected]
Ron van
Lammeren
Harm
Bartholom
eus
May 19, 2014: 11:00
Interpolis gebouw,
Spoorlaan 298 Tilburg
May 12, 15:30
room C332
Team composition
RGIC-01 RGIC-02 RGIC-03 RGIC-04 RGIC-05 RGIC-06 RGIC-07
commissioner WWF Amsterdam Addwhere Ver. Cultuurl. Faunafonds RU/Lingestreek Achmea Agro
coach Lammert Sytze Lammert John Arend Harm Ron
Manager Tom Niene Olga Simon Sander Eric Cornelis
Secretary Marthalina Melkamu Dires Tei Marnix Kristin Linda Nikolaos
Controller Arie Boris Karin Siti Hamim Sabina Merlijn Barbara
Member Peter Lisa Mihai-Andrei Jorn Bastiaen Fahima Joel
Member Sukmo Jeroen Urazov Jan Bauke Pieter Eline Ratih
Member Louise
Team planning
code topic Organization commissioner WUR
coach
WUR
expert
first meeting
commissioner
first meeting
coach RGIC14-01 Climate resilience: flood
patterns in the Zambezi
Delta
World Wildlife Fund Zambia
Elke Praagman
Lammert
Kooistra
Jan
Clevers
May 19 2014: 10:00
via skype in room C332
Gaia
May 12, 13:30
room C320
RGIC14-02 Mapping the pulse of the
city Amsterdam Municipality
Maurits de Hoog
Sytze de
Bruin
Arnold
Bregt
May 19 2014: 9:30
DRO, Weesperplein 8
Amsterdam
May 12, 13:30
room A318
RGIC14-03 Feasibility Study for a
Sustainable Energy
Production and
Savings Opportunity Map
Addwhere
Randy Benjamins
Lammert
Kooistra
John
Stuiver
May 19 2014: 13:00
Vreelandseweg 12-ws
Loenen a/d Vecht
May 12, 15:30
C320
RGIC14-04 Mapping historic and future
landscape patterns in the
cross-border landscape park
of the Rheinland
Vereniging Nederlands Cultuurlandschap
Jordi van Oort and Egbert Jaap Mooiweer
John
Stuiver
Arend
Ligtenberg
May 19 2014: 14:00
Rijksstraatweg 174
6573 DG Beek-Ubbergen
May 12, 15:30
room A318
RGIC14-05 Development of a demo app
for fauna damage
assessment with remote
sensing input
Faunafonds
Frans van Bommel
Gerbert Roerink (Alterra)
Arend
Ligtenberg
Aldo
Bergsma
May 15 (!), 2014: 14:00
BIJ12
Leidseveer 2 Utrecht
May 12, 13:30
room C332
RGIC14-06 Participatory monitoring app
for the maintenance of
floodplain trails
Radboud University Nijmegen
Jan Fliervoet, [email protected]
Roelf de Boer (Nature cooperation
Lingestreek)
Harm
Bartholom
eus
Ron van
Lammeren
May 19, 2014: 10:00
Randwijk May 13 (!),
12:00-13:30
room A318
RGIC14-07 Asbestos detection and
analysis for risk
management use
Achmea Agro
Stefan van Harn [email protected]
Tom Vollebergh [email protected]
Ron van
Lammeren
Harm
Bartholom
eus
May 19, 2014: 11:00
Interpolis gebouw,
Spoorlaan 298 Tilburg
May 12, 15:30
room C332
Fieldwork and excursion issues
Validation in the GI cycle
“real”
land use
validation error matrix
source: www.lgn.nl
Solution: fieldwork
Planning Fieldwork: Skills for Geobusiness
Sunday June 1: Arrival at Reirinck from 19:00
Monday June 2: GNSS
Tuesday June 3: field spectroscopy
Wednesday June 4: fieldwork DIMS
Thursday June 5: fieldwork DIMS
Friday June 6: communication skills II + return to Wageningen (13:00)
Change to practical points fieldwork PPT
Excursion issues
Excursion 1
● Tuesday June 17: CGI (Arnhem) and van den Borne Potatoes (Reusel)
● Departure: 7:15 AM in front of GAIA (by bus)
● Return: 19:00 PM
Excursion 2
● Tuesday June 24: ESRI (Rotterdam) and SHELL (Rijswijk)
● Departure: 6:45 AM in front of GAIA (by bus)
● Return: 20:30 PM
Final presentations at customer day in Wageningen
● Thursday July 3: End presentations and posters for commissioners and other interested colleagues (ideas welcome)
General Program
Company introduction student team (15m)
● Which initial and final view do you have on the company/organisation?
● How do they position the organisation in the GI-field?
● What role do you see for yourself in such type of organisation?
Presentations companies (…)
Final discussion (15m)
● Initial view on company
● Changing views
● Your role/ambitions
Final product for excursion
In the final reflection paper write a specific paragraph on the excursions focussing:
● Science/research vs. consultant/engineer
● Dilemma’s
● Differences in working approach, culture
● How do you see your role in a future career
Tomorrow kick-off Design Integrated Monitoring System
After break communication skills I
RS and GIS Integration Course (GRS-60312)
Communication Skills part 1
Communication skills I
For all teamwork: DIMS and ACT
In RS & GIS Integration Course
Objective: develop and train your professional skills
Ranging between team skills (self) reflection skills
Communication skills I
What could you expect of your future working situation?
Working in a project team: what does that mean?
● Formal: meeting skills, team functions, commissioner, …
● Group process: (give and receive) feedback, Rose of Leary,
negotiation
What and how can I learn from working in a project team?
● Reflection on group process and your role in this
● Formulate learning goals + looking back if and you achieved
them: expectation and reflection paper + individual meetings
What could you expect in your future working
situation?
Phd Junior consultant
source: www.magicmud.com
Three layers of communication
process
In a team:
Objectives
Results
Facts & figures
Project
Structuring
Planning
Work plan
Action points
Power
Interests
Beliefs
Secrets
Conflicts
content
procedure
Communication: content and relation
That’s indeed a very good point that you put forward!
On content level comment about quality of argument.
On relational level the sentence could have different meanings:
This could break the discussion open!
Good point, bad timing!
Good point, why didn’t I think of it.
Again one of those points, let’s move on.
…
How people communicate
Emotional message Business messages
Words 7 20
Voice language 38 35
Body language 55 45
Working in a project team: what does that mean?
Formal (content & procedure):
● meeting skills: purpose, planning, agenda, procedures, making decisions, brain storming
● team functions: chairing, writing minutes
● Commissioner: contact, getting information, keeping informed, negotiation
Process:
● (give and receive) feedback
● Roles: Rose of Leary and Belbin
● Negotiation
Leary’s Rose: a theory about human interaction
leading
aggressive
compe-
titive
helping
co-operative
dependent withdrawn
defiant
opposed
below
together
above
Feedback rules
Self-assess first (“How do you think that it went?”)
Distinguish your observation (what you see and hear) and your interpretation (what it means for you)
Be specific (do not generalize) in your feedback
Be positive (what was good and what can be improved?)
Feedback is a means to help you to improve your communication skills!
Feedback
NOT: You were very nervous
Instead:
(facts): I found your speed of speaking very high
(interpretation): That made me think that you were nervous and also that what you were saying must not be so important.
(effect): The effect on me was that I had difficulty understanding what you were saying and staying interested.
REFLECTION
What and how can I learn from working in a project team? What can I learn from working in a project team?
What can I learn from working in a project team?
Reflection on group process and your role in this
Formulate learning goals + looking back if and you achieved them
Expectation and reflection paper + individual meetings with your coach
Reflection
Like looking in the mirror: how do I function in …
Helps to become more aware of how you act and maybe how to discover what your ideal way of learning is
You are your own mirror!
Personal reflection
1st person: world from own perspective: others are object without own point of view
2nd person: others have their own perspective, more interpretations of certain situation
3rd person: you can look from a distance to your own interactions with other people
Schematic view of different aspects of a person
Reflective learning cycle
Formulate learning
goals
Reflective learning in RGIC
Coach: group meetings + personal interviews
Self assessment dossier:
Application letter: motivation project choice + CV
Expectation paper: self-assessment + learning goals
Reflection paper: reflection on outcomes and progress
Once in a lifetime experience!
Try to find a balance
Formulate personal learning goals
Think about experiences so far: both strong and weak points
Formulate what you want to learn
Formulate your goals positively
Goals can be formulated at different levels: knowledge, skills, attitude
Indicate the way you want to achieve your goals: formulate specific activities
Indicate at which level you are now and what level you want to achieve
Formulate personal learning goals: example
Who has already thought about it?
Formulate personal learning goals: examples
“I want to know more about accepted negotiating strategies in a professional context”.
“I want to learn and practice to be a chairperson in a decision making meeting”.
“I want to feel more confident during a meeting”:
● having sufficient knowledge about the topic of the meeting
● putting my potential input on paper on beforehand
● active interventions during a meeting
● trying to realize why I feel so nervous and by doing this, try to overcome the nerves
● communicating to the meeting that I have this problem of nervousness and asking them to assist me in one way or the other
Formulate personal learning goals: inspiration
“I” domain mainly: Keeping of appointments; Listening;
Pro-active approach to process coaching and reflective
learning; Self reflection; Accepting and using feedback; Pro-
active execution of assigned team function (controller,
member, manager, secretary); Pro-active execution of team
tasks;
“I-We” domain mainly: Quality of oral feedback on group
process; Collaboration; Persuasion; Application of Belbin
team role model to a project team; Commitment to the
group; Stimulation; Communication within the group;
“I-It” domain mainly: Pro-active approach to content
coaching; Output orientation; Flexibility in approach to the
project; Contribution during discussions on the basis of own
disciplinary background;
Formulate personal learning goals: inspiration
“I-We-IT” domain mainly: Approach to procedural side of team work; Quality of oral feedback on products; Quality of written feedback on products
“It” domain mainly: Academic attitude in contribution to report; Written contribution on the basis of own disciplinary background; Commitment to the product; Commitment to the commissioner; Ability to separate means and goals while executing a project proposal; Ability to compile and select relevant information; Ability to integrate contribution with total project perspective; Contribution to written presentation of product(s) (lay-out)
“We” domain mainly: Team roles, Team thinking
“We-It” domain mainly: Academic attitude/contribution in discussions; Quality of written feedback on group process; Communication with external people; Cross disciplinary contribution to report; Cross disciplinary contribution in discussions
Formulate personal learning goals: level
Concept: rubrics
Prepare expectation paper
Deadline: Friday May 16 end of the day
Send your paper to coach of project team
Appointment in week 2
Instructions: see course website
Assignment Learning goals (20 minutes)
Groups of 2
Everybody is preparing 2 learning goals for him/herself for 2 different levels
Discuss the learning goals together: why, do they agree with stated rules, are they realistic
Summary
ACT: next to content also process is a learning outcome
Try to build in ‘reflection moments’:
● Make short notes after meetings
● During team meetings
Read background material CS
Communication skills II
Team roles
Core qualities
Mutual assessment
